Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th 2010

26
Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th 2010

description

Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th 2010. Remove the Complexity. Transition Probability Chaos Theory attractors Signal to Noise ratio MultiColinearity. Transition Probability Golden Shiner. Hatchling. 5%. 20%. Juvenile. Egg. 80%. Pond Scum. Transition Probability. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th 2010

Page 1: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Texas Smart Grid ConsortiumNovember 8th 2010

Page 2: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

• Transition Probability• Chaos Theory attractors• Signal to Noise ratio• MultiColinearity

Remove the Complexity

Page 3: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Egg

Hatchling

Pond Scum

Juvenile

20%20%

80%80%

5%5%

Transition ProbabilityGolden Shiner

Page 4: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Child Star “Adult” Star

Super Star

Pond Scum

Rehab

Politician

10%10%

70%70%

20%20%

40%40%

40%40%

100%100%

Late Night Infomercial

SecurityGuard

20%20%

Transition Probability

Page 5: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Interval Read Poor Signal Quality

Pond Scum

92%92%

2%2%

6%6%

MeterSenseMeterSenseRepositoryVersioningAuditing

Aggregation

EstimateOverride

EditGuide Edits

MetersenseCertified10 rulesBased

Validation routines Service

Orders

98%98%

2%2%1%1%

99%99%

QualityReads

100%100%

Transition ProbabilityAMI Data Cleansing

Page 6: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010
Page 7: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

NoiseNoise

Signal

Signal

Can’t Hear

Hear

Hear Clearly

RatiosRatiosSignal to Noise

Page 8: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Disgust

Desperat

ion

Won’t Use

Can’t Refuse

Locked InsideTaking a Snooze

RatiosRatiosPort-a-Potty

Behavior

Alcohol

Page 9: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Complexity of Integration

Data Qualit

y

Won’t Use

Use

DrivesInnovation

RatiosRatiosMultiCollinearity

Amount of Data

Page 10: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010
Page 11: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Chaos TheoryChaos TheoryAttractorsAttractors

Page 12: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

AttractorAttractor

Chaos TheoryChaos TheoryAttractorsAttractors

Page 13: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Chaos TheoryChaos TheoryAttractorsAttractors

Page 14: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Chaos TheoryChaos TheoryAttractorsAttractors

Page 15: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010
Page 16: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Savings$645.00Total Cost

$3.58Daily Cost

1145Total Kwh

610On Peak

Flat Rate$534.00Total Cost

$2.96Daily Cost

1037Total Kwh

558On Peak

Time of Use Rate Savings $111.00

Time based rates comparison

Avg. Temp 25 F

Page 17: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Identify high line losses Loss revenue loss protection Blink momentary interruption analysis Secondary line theft Identification Balance Primary loads Phase Balancing and circuit utilization Equipment trouble shooting Transformer optimization incorporated with weather conditions Scheduled Preventative Maintenance Improve Voltage regulation and capacitor placement Customer load profiles Customer class load profiles Network location load profiles Top contributors to system peaks Water non-compliance usage Water leak detection Water main leak detection Water pressure analysis

MDM Iphone / Android structure

Reporting Structure

Application sharingEngineering Firms

ConsultantsUser Community

Web Based sharing engine

BPO Decision Automation

Page 18: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Wholesale Energy Purchases – Retail Member energy sales = Lost revenue

Electric Distribution Line Loss

Page 19: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Peak Load Contribution by Rate Class

Load Analytics

Page 20: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Loss 4-8%

Diagnostic System Losses

Causes; Theft, Meter issues, Voltage variance, equipment sizing placement, disturbances

Page 21: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Select System

Top Circuit line loss by percentage of revenue

System Line Loss Report

Total Losses for this period

Same Period last year

Page 22: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Loss 4-8%

Diagnostic System Losses

Secondary Power Theft

Page 23: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010
Page 24: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Municipal Utility Energy Demand 30 to 40 percent of the electricity is used by water utilities

Reduce Peak demand charges by 20%

Identify Lift Station

Malfunctions

Run Pumps Off Peak

Page 25: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Conservation Monitoring Conservation and threshold monitoring of specific energy classes allowing performance comparison and Device monitoring and Energy Resource Management

Page 26: Texas Smart Grid Consortium November 8 th  2010

Charleston SC. expects to save $18.5 million over 15yrs through performance contracts that include saving water and energy.

Galveston TX. Through more accurate water meters expects to save $1.3 million per year

Glendale WI. Water Efficiency contributes to LEED certification