Electroweak Symmetry Breaking at the Tevatron, the LHC and the Linear Collider
Tevatron Collider Status and Prospects
description
Transcript of Tevatron Collider Status and Prospects
Tevatron ColliderStatus and Prospects
Shameless outreach advertisement:
Follow the Tevatron on Facebook and Twitter!
Ron Moore
Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
Contents
• Overview
• Luminosity Evolution
• Operational Considerations
• Prospects and Projections
• References to other FNAL talks in the Accelerator sessions…– Vladimir Nagaslaev – Antiproton Production at Fermilab (Accelerator 3)
– Sasha Shemyakin – Antiproton Accumulation and Cooling at the Fermilab Recycler Ring (Accelerator 1)
– Phil Adamson – Fermilab Main Injector (Accelerator 3)
– Mary Convery – Optimization of Integrated Luminosity of the Fermilab Tevatron Collider (Accelerator 1)
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
2R. Moore - FNAL
Looking Down on the Fermilab Accelerator Complex
1 km
Main Injector
& Recycler
Tevatron
Pbar Debuncher & Accumulator
D0
CDF
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 4
Tevatron Overview
• Synchrotron providing proton-pbar collisions @ 980 GeV beam energy
– Injection energy is 150 GeV
• Tevatron radius = 1 km revolution time ~ 21 s
• Virtually all of the Tevatron magnets are superconducting
– Cooled by liquid helium, operate at 4 K fun fact: ≈350 MJ stored energy!
• 36 bunches of proton and pbars circulate in single beampipe
– 3 trains of 12 bunches with 396 ns separation
– Electrostatic separators keep beams apart on helical orbits
• 8 Cu RF cavities to keep beam in bucket, provide acceleration
– 1113 RF buckets (53.1 MHz 18.8 ns bucket length)
• 2 low (small beam size) intersection points (CDF and D0)
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 5
Tevatron
Tev dipole
The Big Picture
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
Record month Dec 2008 ≈ 250 pb-1
Record weekly delivered luminosity = 73.1 pb-1
6R. Moore - FNAL
Record month Dec 2008 ≈ 250 pb-1
Record weekly delivered luminosity = 73.1 pb-1
The Logarithmic Big Picture
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
7R. Moore - FNAL
Tevatron Peak Luminosity
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
each point is one store > 300 µb-1/s now routine
8R. Moore - FNAL
Beam Intensities
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
9R. Moore - FNAL
10000 109 278 109 / bunch 3000 109 83 109 / bunch
Destroyed Collimators in Tevatron (2003)
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 10
Protons
prompted a faster quench protection system
tungsten
Stored beam energy
1013 protons @ 1 TeV ≈ 1.6 MJ
Damage done in ~10 ms
1.5 m long stainless steel
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 11
Increasing Tevatron Luminosity
• Many gradual improvements
• Higher antiproton stacking rate → more antiprotons faster
• Recycler + Electron Cooling → more pbars with smaller emittances
• Smaller β* at CDF and D0 → smaller beam size (now down to ≈30μm)
• Improved beam lifetimes in Tevatron
– More separation between protons and antiprotons
• Better instrumentation, monitoring
• Better reliability, reproducibility
)()(2
**
z
ap
ap HNfN
L
• N = bunch intensities, f = collision frequency
• ε = transverse emittance (size), σz = bunch length
• H = “hour glass” factor (~0.6 for finite bunch length)
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 12
Magnet Motion / Orbit Stabilization
V. Ranjbar
Orbit stabilization ON
E11 vert BPM [mm]
F17 horz BPM [mm]
D0 proton halo [Hz]
Proton vert tune
C4Q4 roll [μrad]
C4Q4 pitch [μrad]
Proton intensity [E9]
Store 4402
New BPM electronics help us see this motion!
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 13
Strategy: Be Efficient, Be Consistent
• Big upgrades are done ⇒ Make the most of what we’ve got!
• Make HEP shot-setup more efficient– “One-shots” for Tevatron injection when needed – allows more pbar stacking cycles– Automation of tune, coupling, chromaticity measurements/settings– Working on faster proton injection → 2 bunches per shot instead of 1
• Increased/improved automation– Tune, coupling, chromaticity measurements/settings during shot-setup
– Orbit smooths during/between HEP stores• Reduce orbit drifts store-to-store, keeps optics consistent; sneak beam losses through IPs
– Faster scraping/halo removal– Beam-beam tune shift control
• Automated proton tune settings to account for varying pbar intensities shot-to-shot
• Monitor decrease in beam-beam tune shift during store, alert operators to nudge up
• Shorter HEP stores– Higher average pbar stacking rate → shorter stores for ≈ same initial lumi– More stores with higher average luminosity over store duration
Stack, Stash, Store - Repeat
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
our record week
Accumulator [1010]
Recycler [1010]
Tevatron Luminosity
[μb-1 / s]
Stack pbars in Accumulator shoot to Recycler stash
HEP stores
Shoot pbars from Recycler to Tev for HEP
14R. Moore - FNAL
More Integrated Luminosity per Store
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
- More integrated luminosity per store hour
- Running shorter stores ⇒ more stores / week
15R. Moore - FNAL
Beam-Beam Effects
• Recall both beams circulate within a single beam pipe!– EM fields from one beam disrupts the other when passing
near/through it
• Head-on and long-range collisions (parasitic or “near-miss”) – Would like > 5σ separation between beams prior to collisions
• Not always possible
– Affects all aspects of operation – injection, acceleration, squeeze,…
• Highest antiproton intensities are problematic– Antiprotons 3-4x smaller transversely than protons
– High proton losses occasionally quench the Tevatron in squeeze
– Early in HEP proton lifetime can dominate lumi lifetime
– Occasionally back off beam intensities to sort out issues
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 16
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 17
Head-On Beam-Beam Effects
• Head-on collisions: each beam acts as (non-linear) focusing lens
– Tune gets shifted up proportional to (N / beam size)
– Tune footprint also spreads out – unavoidably crossing resonances
– NP ≈ 250 (10)9 εP≈ 18π mm-mrad → ξA ≈ 0.020 (pbar shift from protons)
– NA ≈ 70 (10)9 εA≈ 5π mm-mrad → ξP ≈ 0.020 (proton shift from pbars)
– Beam-beam tune shift on protons ≈ pbars!
Nr
2
3 0• N = bunch intensity
• ε = transverse emittance
• r0 = classical radius of proton
Head-on beam-beam
tune shift parameter
2 collision
points
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State UniversityR. Moore - FNAL 18
0 1 2 3
Beam-beam force Proton density Antiproton density
r/
Schematic of Beam-Beam Force on Proton Bunch
Round, gaussian bunchesproton pbar
x
y
A significant fraction of the proton bunches feel the strongest, non-linear beam-beam force from the smaller pbars
Arb
itrar
y un
its
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 19
Beam-Beam Tune Shift Distributions
M. Syphers
Equal bunch sizes
Protonsbroad tune shift
Pbarspeaked
tune shiftσP = 2 σA
Δν / ξ
dN /
dR
for
a b
unch
4/7 = 7th order
7/12 = 12th order
3/5 = 5th order
Beam-Beam Tune Spread
Tune spread caused by pbars causes
proton tunes to span strong resonances
→ higher beam loss and/or poorer lifetime
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
20R. Moore - FNAL
This is just an “artist’s rendering” of the
beam-beam induced tune spread…
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 21
Mitigating Beam-Beam Effects
• Since ~Feb 08 deliberately “blowing up” antiprotons by ≈25% at flattop
– Noise source on directional stripline
– Reduce the emittance mismatch → proton tune spread
– Helps beam losses in squeeze and in collisions
– Would like to optimize the scheme, account for bunch-by-bunch differences
• Also testing scraping higher intensity protons @ 8 GeV in Main Injector
– Bump beam into collimators, remove tails that would be lost in Tevatron
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 22
Proton Loss in Squeeze vs Pbar Intensity
Long-range beam-beam effects: higher pbar intensity → higher proton loss
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 23
Store 6908 – Comparison to Model without Beam-Beam Effects
Initial Lumi = 320 μb-1/s
only ~5% luminosity loss from beam-beam effects!
Protons suffer from beam-beam effects
Luminosity Integral Proton IntensityModelData
A. Valishev
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 24
Beam Lifetimes during HEP• Pbar lifetime dominated by luminosity – good• Most protons lost in non-luminous processes – but better with larger pbar emittances
Luminosity[μb-1/s]
Pbar Lifetime
/ ExpectedLifetime from
Luminosity
Store 6203
Proton Lifetime
/ ExpectedLifetime from
Luminosity
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
300
225
150
75
0
Reliability
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
Year StoresNormal
Terminations%Normal
Terminations
Avg Store Hrs/Week (outside
of planned shutdowns)
2003 186 55 30% -
2004 166 110 66% 100
2005 243 170 69% 110
2006 171 107 63% 100
2007 220 177 80% 110
FY2008 304 262 86% 106
FY2009 275 244 88% 110
Improving
Reliability
25R. Moore - FNAL
Prospects
• More pbars (faster) still most straightforward way to higher luminosity
• Believe Tevatron can deliver peak luminosity > 400 µb-1/s– As a stunt, since integrated lumi would fall off @ current stacking rates
• Squeeze losses still a concern, so still blow up pbars @ flat-top
– Identified aperture restriction on B-side of CDF (displaced beam pipe)
– During Oct 08 shutdown, found pipe misaligned as expected– Moved pipe successfully to open up aperture (though not quite
centered)
• All machines continue working on operational robustness, efficiency
• Quote from my boss (Roger Dixon) in Fermilab Today: – “…the Accelerator Division has no shortage of innovative people who get an
adrenalin rush from making unexpected improvements that could make our projections look silly.”
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
26R. Moore - FNAL
Luminosity Projections
• > 2.5 fb-1 / year is reasonable goal– No shutdowns, still need to be lucky
• 12 week shutdown began June 15– Install rest of new Booster correctors, poke holes in MI for NOνA– Find and fix known leaks in 8 of 24 Tevatron cryogenic houses
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
27R. Moore - FNAL
• 200 pb-1 / month has become routine
Luminosity Projection
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
R. Moore - FNAL 28
currently 6.8 fb-1 delivered
real data for FY02-FY08
9.3 fb-1
7.8 fb-1
Inte
gra
ted
lu
min
osi
ty (
fb-1)
---------
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
~12 fb-1
have achieved design parameter goals of Run II
on track for ~12 fb-1 through FY11 even with no further
improvements
Summary
• Tevatron and whole accelerator complex running great– delivered ≈ 3.5 fb-1 over last running period (Oct 07-Jun 09)
– now approaching 7 fb-1 total in Run 2
• Peak lumi > 300 µb-1/s and integrated > 200 pb-1/month routine
• Ongoing efforts to improve operational efficiencies and get more pbars/week and HEP stores with greater lumi/hr
• Could deliver > 9 fb-1 by end FY10 and nearly 12 fb-1 by end FY11– Let’s go all the way through FY11!
• Looking forward to physics results from both CDF and D0
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
29R. Moore - FNAL
Tevatron HEP Store Lengths
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
30R. Moore - FNAL
Collider Operational Model
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
C. Gattuso
curr
ent r
egim
edepends on pbar stacking
rate and lumi lifetime
75 pb-1 ≈ consistent with our best week
Integrated luminosity optimized with 15-20 hr stores to build up stashes of 350-400 1010 pbars
at current stacking rates
31R. Moore - FNAL
Making HEP Shot-Setup Faster
APS DPF 2009 – Wayne State University
- faster manipulations in Recycler- ongoing tweaking and automation in
Tevatron-recently started 2-bunch proton
injections- faster halo removal
32R. Moore - FNAL