TEST REPORT INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC. · 2014-02-21 · Intertek Testing Services NA,...

This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek’s Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek’s responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.

TEST REPORT INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC.

1717 Arlingate Lane Columbus, OH, 43228 PROJECT NO.: G101483861 ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014

INTERIM REPORT NO. 101483861COL-001B

RENDERED TO

Client: TSI Supercool 3574 Corona Street Lake Worth, FL 33461 Contact: Mr. Paul Erdek Phone: (561) 582-2245

GENERAL: This report gives the results of the evaluation of TSI Supercool’s Leak Dye #22816 with R-134a and as well as R1234yf, per SAE J2297 (Feb2011) Ultraviolet Leak Detection: Stability and Compatibility Criteria of Fluorescent Refrigerant Leak Detection Dyes for Mobile R-134a and R-1234yf (HFO-1234yf) Air-Conditioning Systems. This investigation was authorized by Mr. Paul Erdek using signed quote Q500499876. The testing began on 1/3/2014 and will be completed on 2/10/2014. A sample in good condition was provided by TSI Supercool and was received on January 2nd, 2014. The recommended dye concentration was stated to be ¼ Oz per 8 Oz of lubricant. The lubricants used for the test mixture were as follows: 1/3 4GS Mineral Oil, 1/3 CAR Quest PAG 46 and 1/3 NL POE 68. The sample was assigned the unique identification number COL1401021202-001 and tested at Intertek’s facility at 1717 Arlingate Lane, Columbus, OH 43228, USA. CONCLUSION: This report concludes the evaluation of Leak Dye #22816. Based on this evaluation of Leak Dye #22816 submitted by TSI Supercool PASS the acceptance Criteria of SAE J2297 (Feb2011) Ultraviolet Leak Detection: Stability and Compatibility Criteria of Fluorescent Refrigerant Leak Detection Dyes for Mobile R-134a and R-1234yf (HFO-1234yf) Air-Conditioning Systems. See Table 1 for Calibrated Equipment See following pages for all interim test results. Test Performed by: Report Approved by:

Karen Gramke John Senediak Chemical Laboratory Technician II Senior Chemist Analytical Laboratory Columbus Office

1717 Arlingate Lane Columbus, Ohio, 43228 Telephone: 614-279-8090 Facsimile: 614-279-4642 www.intertek.com

Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc. COL-HVAC-004 (12/07/2011) Informative of 13

REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Table 1

Item Equipment Type Equipment # Cal. Due Date

1 Analytical Balance CE1017 8/20/14

2 10mL Graduated Cylinder CE2221 VBU 3 100mL Graduated Cylinder CE2184 VBU 4 Digital Calipers CE2028 9/9/14 5 Shore “A” Durometer CE2201 Reference Only 6 Shore “D” Durometer CE2202 Initial Cal Only 7 Digital Thermometer CE2312 9/11/14 8 Barometer CE1109 6/3/14 9 Temp/Humidity Meter E227 3/13/14 10 Falex CE2222 Reference Only 11 Stop Watch CE1183 9/10/14 12 Temp Recorder CE2312 9/11/14 13 Viscometer CE2136 VBU 14 Oven CE2349 VBU 15 Digital Manometer CE2332 2/18/14 16 Manifold CE2223 Initial Cal 17 2L Pressure Vessel CE2224 Reference Only 18 25X Microscope CE2216 Reference Only 19 Burette CE2032 Initial Cal Only 20 Viscometer CE2137 VBU 21 Balance CE1092 8/20/14 22 UV Lamp CE2367 Reference Only



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Section 7- Stability Testing: Clause 7.4.1

“Neat” R-134a and Lubricant Mixture 2X Recommended Dye (0.50 OZ / 8 OZ)

in R134a and Lubricant Mixture TAN

(mgKOH/g) TAN

(mgKOH/g) Range: 3.44 – 5.49 Range: 4.14 – 4.96

“Neat” HFO-1234yf and Lubricant Mixture 2X Recommended Dye (0.50 OZ / 8 OZ) in HFO-1234yf and Lubricant Mixture

TAN (mgKOH/g)

TAN (mgKOH/g)

Range: 0.58 – 0.94 Range: 0.38 – 1.19 Following the aging process for 14 days and 175°C, Using “Rank Order Analysis”, TAN in the sealed tubes containing double the recommended concentration of dye showed no increase in TAN compared to control samples using rank order analysis and therefore “PASS” the requirement. Clause 7.4.2 Following the aging process for 14 days and 175°C, for R134A, metals in the sealed tubes containing double the recommended concentration of dye did show evidence of darkening and slight copper plating but no increase was seen compared to control samples and therefore “PASS” the requirement. For 1234yf, metals in the sealed tubes containing double the recommended concentration of dye were untarnished, with no evidence of copper plating or corrosion. Metals in the control tubes containing neat lubricant also were untarnished with no evidence of copper plating or corrosion. Using “Rank Order Analysis”, test samples showed no increase in corrosion or copper plating compare to control samples and therefore “PASS” the requirement. Clause 7.4.3 Following the aging process for 14 days and 175°C for R134a, the liquid in the sealed tubes containing double the recommended concentration of dye was cloudy and had evidence of precipitate or insoluble material but not increase was seen compared to control samples and therefore “PASS” the requirement. For 1234yf, the liquid in the sealed tubes containing double the recommended concentration of dye were clear with no evidence of precipitate or insoluble material. Liquid in the control tubes containing neat lubricant were also clear with no evidence of precipitate or insoluble material. Using “Rank Order Analysis”, test samples showed no increase in precipitate or insoluble material compare to control samples and therefore “PASS” the requirement.



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014

R-134A cnt v Test 1234yf cnt v Test



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Section 8- Fluorescence Testing: Clause 8.7 Following the aging process for 14 days at 175°C, the liquid in the sealed tubes containing double the recommended concentration of dye exhibited a visual intensity equal to the un-aged tubes prepared with the recommended dosage of dye when exposed to identical incident UV irradiation and ambient lighting and temperature condition and therefore “PASS” the requirement.

Order of 2x Concentration Tubes: R-134a Post Exposu re Test, R-134a Post

Exposure Test, 1234yf Post Exposure Test,1234yf Pos t Exposure Test All tubes Aged at 175˚C




Order of Recommended Concentration Tubes: R-134a Po st Exposure Control,

R-134 Post Exposure Control, 1234yf Post Exposure C ontrol, 1234yf Post Exposure Control

All Tubes un-aged at an ambient Temp of approx. 22˚ C.



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Section 9- Non-Metallic Materials Compatibility Tes ting:

Post Exposure “Neat” R-134a and

Lubricant Mixture Control Samples

Post Exposure 2X Recommended Dye (0.50 OZ / 8 OZ) in R-134a and Lubricant Mixture

Material Change in %

Volume (%)

Change in Hardness

Change in % Volume

(%)

Change in Hardness

PTFE Range: -31 to 30 -4 to -3 Range: -5 to 2 -4 to -1 Nylon Range: -4 to 1 0 to 8 Range: -20 to 22 -1 to 3

Polyester Range: -15 to 19 -16 to -9 Range: 0 to 5 -9 to -8 HNBR Range: 16 to 40 8 to 17 Range: 29 to 42 9 to 13

Neoprene Range: 30 to 49 -20 to -8 Range: 27 to 46 -20 to -11 NBR Range: 39 to 44 4 to 12 Range: 28 to 35 4 to 6

EPDM Range: 32 to 41 -20 to -11 Range: 18 to 40 -15 to -11

Butyl Range: 15 to 73 -26 to -24 Range: -11 to 36 -25 to -20

Post Exposure “Neat” R-1234yf and

Lubricant Mixture Control Samples

Post Exposure 2X Recommended Dye (0.50 OZ / 8 OZ) in R-1234yf and Lubricant Mixture

Material Change in %

Volume (%)

Change in Hardness

Change in % Volume

(%)

Change in Hardness

PTFE Range: 20 – 51 -3 to -3 Range: -28 – 38 -3 to 0

Nylon Range: 9 – 17 0 to 2 Range: -8 – 22 1 to 2

Polyester Range: -14 – 13 -14 to -13 Range: -14 – 13 -17 to -12

HNBR Range: 8 – 22 9 to 13 Range: 1 – 43 9 to 16

*Neoprene Range: 31 – 36 -23 to -16 Range: 37 – 53 -27 to -15

NBR Range: 26 – 42 4 to 19 Range: 27 – 47 6 to 12

EPDM Range: 22 – 54 -17 to -15 Range: 13 – 47 -25 to -13

Butyl Range: 35 – 64 -28 to -32 Range: 41 – 45 -33 to -29

• Neoprene failed to fall within the “Rank Order Analysis” Evaluation for Volume Change, but was well within the “Rank Order Analysis” for Swell. Therefore Passes the requirement.



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Clause 9.8.1 Following the aging process for 30 days at 150°C, the non-metallic elastomers in the 2X recommended dye concentration tubes did not increase in hardness when compared those contained in the “Neat” control samples using “Rank Order Analysis”, and therefore “PASS” the requirement. Clause 9.8.2 Following the aging process for 30 days at 150°C, the liquid aged along with the non-metallic elastomers in the 2X recommended dye concentration tubes did not increase in particles, precipitates or insolubles when compared those contained in the “Neat” control samples using “Rank Order Analysis”, and therefore “PASS” the requirement. Clause 9.8.3** Following the aging process for 30 days at 150°C, the non-metallic elastomers in the 2X recommended dye concentration tubes did not increase in volume or swell when compared those contained in the “Neat” control samples using “Rank Order Analysis”, and therefore “PASS” the requirement



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Section 10- Wear Testing:

“Neat” R-134a and Lubricant Mixture 2X Recommended Dye (0.50 OZ / 8 OZ)

in R-134a and Lubricant Mixture Mass (g) Mass (g)

Range: 0.0021 – 0.0411 Range: 0.0015 – 0.0020

“Neat” HFO-1234yf and Lubricant Mixture 2X Recommended Dye (0.50 OZ / 8 OZ) in HFO-1234yf and Lubricant Mixture

Mass (g) Mass (g) Range: 0.0033 – 0.0053 Range: 0.0011 – 0.0020

Clause 10.3.1 Following the 5 hour Falex performance test, pins protected by the lubricant containing 2X recommended additive concentration did not increase in mass loss when compared those protected by “Neat” 1234yf Compatible lubricant mixture or R-134a lubricant mixture control samples using “Rank Order Analysis”, and therefore “PASS” the requirement.



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Clause 10.3.2 Following the 5 hour Falex performance test, blocks protected by the lubricant containing 2X recommended additive concentration did not increase in wear scaring by visual comparison under a 25X magnification when compared to blocks protected by “Neat” HFO-1234yf Compatible lubricant mixture or R-134a lubricant mixture control samples using “Rank Order Analysis”, and therefore “PASS” the requirement.



REPORT NO.: 101483861COL-001B ISSUE DATE: February 21, 2014 Section 11- Viscosity Effect Testing:

“Neat” Lubricant

Recommended Dye (0.25 OZ / 8 OZ)

Lubricant

Comparison of Viscosity of Neat Lubricant Mixture to

Mixture containing Recommended Dye

Concentration

Temperature (°C) Viscosity

(cSt) Viscosity

(cSt) % Change 40 51.38 51.42 +0.1 100 8.04 8.10 +0.7

Clause 11.3 The mixture of lubricant containing the recommended dye concentration did not change the viscosity of the lubricant by more than 2% when compared to the viscosity of “Neat” lubricant control samples using “Rank Order Analysis”, and therefore “PASS” the requirement.

TEST REPORT INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC. · 2014-02-21 · Intertek Testing Services NA,...

Documents

Transcript of TEST REPORT INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES NA, INC. · 2014-02-21 · Intertek Testing Services NA,...