Test Challenges in MMICs, RFICs and High Speed Analog...

16
Test Challenges in MMICs, RFICs and High Speed Analog Circuits Dror Regev

Transcript of Test Challenges in MMICs, RFICs and High Speed Analog...

Test Challenges in MMICs, RFICs and High Speed Analog Circuits

Dror Regev

Dror Regev

Agenda

• Presto-Engineering

• Challenges in Wide-Band and mm-Wave Test

• MMIC/RFIC Probing at high mm-Wave Frequencies

• Standard Automatic Tester limitations

• mm-Wave DUT docking & interfacing challenges

• Solution Approaches & RFIC Test Economics

• Frequency conversion technical consideration example

Dror Regev

Challenges in Wide-Band and mm-Wave Test

Ever growing demand for Data Rate, drive extended BW and Freq.

Wide Band multi-carrier modulation schemes requiring high EVM.

Reduced Dynamic Range, impairments worsen.

5 GHz 60 GHz E-Band

802.11ac Wi-Fi

802.11ad Wi-Gig

PTP 4G/LTE 1.8 GHz 1

60

M

Hz 500

MHz

𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝑭𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒓 ↑, 𝑵𝑭 ↑, 𝑻𝑿 𝑷𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 ↓, Linearity ↓, Phase Noise ↑, Ripple & Reflections ↑

Dror Regev

MMIC/RFIC Probing @ mm-Wave Frequencies

• GSG probe is dispersive and radiates energy

• For good S-par calibration, 30dB isolation

between probes is required. At 150um pitch, calibration

substrate BW is not guaranteed beyond 65-70GHz but perform

reasonably up to E-band frequencies.

• λ/20 GSG Probe pitch, should be maximum pitch for accurate testing. Hence 150um pitch for εr=1 can perform to ~ 100GHz. However, DUT εr will affect test accuracy as :

• 43um GSG probe is needed for best performance at ~ 110GHz.

Dror Regev

MMIC PA Probing @ E-band (71-86GHz)

• CW Gain and Saturation test @ Wafer Level

• 50um Thick GaAs wafer on insulator carrier pose Thermal Stress -> Pulse?

• Recent market drive towards full S-par test.

Dror Regev

RFIC Transceiver Probing @ E-band (71-86GHz)

• 500MHz BW wafer level RX & TX EVM tests • Employing WB Frequency Converters to/from E-band

Dror Regev

Standard Automatic Tester limitations

• Max I/O frequency limited to 6

or 12GHz!. Needs “Frequency

Extension” to drive/test higher

frequencies.

• Instantaneous BW limited

~ 200MHz.

Dror Regev

mm-Wave DUT docking & interfacing challenges

Sockets are limited in frequency (<30GHz) and pose high parasitic and no perfectly consistent mm-Wave contact resulting test errors.

Many 60 GHz DUTs are integrated with antennas.

Path Loss over the air (68dB @ 1meter/60GHz)

Crosstalk and Multipath especially for multisite

VSWR of socket and TL degrade Test Flatness. De-embedding?. 𝟏𝒏𝑯 𝑺𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒄

@𝟑𝟎𝑮𝑯𝒛 = j𝛚𝑳 ≈ j200 ohm

𝟓𝟎𝒑𝑯 𝑺𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝑴𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉 @𝟑𝟎𝑮𝑯𝒛

≈ j10 ohm

SiBEAM

WHD module

(Ali M. Niknejad)

Antennas

Dror Regev

More Challenges in WB and mm-Wave Test

Link Budget Example 1GHz BW @ 60GHz:

1 dB out comp. 60GHz converter (no PA): -20dBm

TX Back Off: 8dB

Maximum TX power: -28dBm

TX + DUT Antenna Gains: 20dB

1 Meter path loss: 68dB

Total over the air (OTA) loss: 48dB

Conclusion: Such stand alone converter can not support WB EVM testing OTA.

𝑅𝑋 𝐷𝑈𝑇 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟: 𝑷𝑵𝒐𝒊𝒔𝒆 @ 𝟏𝑮𝑯𝒛 𝑩𝑾 = -174+10 𝒍𝒐𝒈𝟏𝟎𝟗+NF(𝟔𝒅𝑩 )= -78dBm

𝑅𝑋 𝐷𝑈𝑇 𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙: 𝑷𝑹𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝑺𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒍 = -28 dBm - 48= -76dBm

Dror Regev

Solution Approaches & RFIC Test Economics

“Frequency extension” NB or WB:

• Convert (or multiply) I/O Frequency of automatic tester, signal generator and test instruments to/from mm-Wave frequency.

Testing Modules integrated with Antennas :

• Employ wafer probing when relevant

Economic OTA testing or “Contact less”

probing.

UWB on load board E-Band converter 60GHz IQ converter 60GHz Transceiver

Dror Regev

Frequency conversion technical consideration IQ Conversion 101:

IF @ fLO

fLO

fLO

BBI

00/900

BBQ

IF1

IF2

BBI

00/900

BBQ

𝑰 + 𝑸

𝟐

𝑸 − 𝑰

𝟐

IF @ fLO

fLO

fLO

Ideal Up-Conversion

Ideal Down-Conversion

𝑩𝑩𝑰 = 𝑺𝒊𝒏(𝝎𝑳𝑶𝒕) ∙

𝑰+𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

−𝑰−𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

=

= 𝑰

𝟐𝑺𝒊𝒏 (𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 +……

𝑩𝑩𝑸 = 𝑪𝒐𝒔(𝝎𝑳𝑶𝒕) ∙

𝑰+𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 −

𝑰−𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

=

= 𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 +…….

Dror Regev

Frequency conversion technical consideration Transceiver Frequency Plan using a Single Synthesizer:

Popular case : M=2, N=1.

32

21

RFLOLO

FFF

LO1, LO2

Generation:

= LO1

= LO2

GHzFF

F RFLOLO 20

32

21

GHzFF

F RFLOLO 20

32

21

Dror Regev

Frequency conversion technical consideration Ideal performance of 1/3, 2/3 frequency plan:

fRF @ 3fLO1

WB Signal IF @ fRF/3 RF=1LO2+1IF

fLO2 =

2*fLO1

fLO1 =

fRF/3

BBI

00/900

BBQ

IF1

IF2

fIF=fRF/3

𝑻𝑿𝟏𝟏 =desired output = 𝑪𝒐𝒔(𝟐𝝎𝑳𝑶𝒕) ∙𝑰+𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 −

𝑰−𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

= 𝑰+𝑸

𝟒𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟐𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 + 𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟐𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

- 𝑰−𝑸

𝟒𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟐𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 + 𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟐𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

= 𝑰+𝑸

𝟒𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟑𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 + ⋯ . -

𝑰−𝑸

𝟒𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟑𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 + ⋯

Outputs @ ω = 3 𝝎𝑳𝑶𝟏

Dror Regev

Frequency conversion technical consideration Inter-Modulations in Mixers:

𝑻𝑿𝟐𝟏 = Iinter-modulation IMD21 = In Band Impairment=

𝒂 ∙ 𝑪𝒐𝒔(𝟒𝝎𝑳𝑶𝒕) ∙𝑰+𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 −

𝑰−𝑸

𝟐𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 =

a𝑰+𝑸

𝟒𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟑𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 + 𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟓𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 -

𝑰−𝑸

𝟒𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟑𝝎𝑳𝑶 − 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕 + 𝑪𝒐𝒔 (𝟓𝝎𝑳𝑶 + 𝝎𝑩𝑩)𝒕

Outputs @ ω = 3 𝝎𝑳𝑶

𝑰𝑴𝑫𝒏𝒎 = ±𝒏𝒇𝑳𝑶 ± 𝒎𝒇𝑹𝑭 Where n, m integers 0, 1,2,3

Special interest should be paid for IMD products with m=1 which

inherently have higher power levels

Dror Regev

Frequency conversion technical consideration M21 Impairment in Heterodyne 1/3, 2/3f0:

Up converter (as well as Down converter) mixer present:

significant 2LO-1RF inter-modulation product around the same center frequency.

IF @ fRF/3 RF=1LO2+1IF

IM21=2LO2-1IF fRF

WB Signal

Intermod. a

fLO2 =

2*fLO1

fLO1 =

fRF/3

BBI

00/900

BBQ

IF1

IF2

fRF/3

a- Mixer IM21 suppression can be improved to a certain level by

improving Balun Balance

Dror Regev

Summary

• High mm-Wave wafer probing relevant when:

– Chip ASP and performance is critical as with PAs.

– Packaging or final module expensive as with MCMs.

• Socket testing is limited today to ~ 30GHz

• OTA testing is good for characterization and pose challenges in HVM environment.

• “Contact less” probing has potential advantages.