TESLA: a new Tool for Science- at present 51 Institutes in 12 countries Original Goals: Obtain...
Transcript of TESLA: a new Tool for Science- at present 51 Institutes in 12 countries Original Goals: Obtain...
1Albrecht Wagner
TESLA: a new Tool for Science
Exploring the femtosecond (10-15 s) domain:
- the world after the big bang
- the change of matter on shortest time scales
2Albrecht Wagner
TESLA
On curved paths electrons emit synchrotron radiation.Ä Energy lossÄ Linear accelerators needed to reach highest energies!Ä Highest possible accelerating gradients necessary.
3Albrecht Wagner
The Scientific Case of theLinear Collider
Understanding the Higgs-Mechanism and the masses of elementary particles
Understanding Understanding matter, matter, energyenergy, , spacespace and time.and time.
Are “stings” the fundamental entities?
Connecting quarks and the cosmos
4Albrecht Wagner
The World-wide Consensus on the next LC
A world-wide consensus has formed for a baseline LC project in which positrons collide with electrons at energies up to 500 GeV, with luminosity above 1034 cm-2s-1. The energy should be upgradable to about 1 TeV. Above this firm baseline, several options are envisioned whose priority will depend upon the nature of the discoveries made at the LHC and in the initial LC operation.The LHC and LC will offer mutually supporting views of the new physics world at the TeV scale.
OECD GSF Consultative Group on High-Energy Physics:There should be a significant period of concurrent running of the LHC and the LC, requiring the LC to start operating before 2015.
5Albrecht Wagner
The Standard Model
3 families of particles
3 forces and their particles
The mechanism of mass generation© Scientific American
6Albrecht Wagner
Key Questions of Particle Physics
• What is mass/matter ?
• Can the forces be unified?• Fundamental symmetry of forces and building blocks?• Can quantum physics and general relativity be united?• Do we live in 4 dimensions?• What happened in the very early universe ?• Origin of dark matter
why are carriers of weak force so heavy while the photon is massless?
7Albrecht Wagner
Where do the experimental answers lie?
• At highest energiesHadron Colliders- LHC under construction at CERN
• In precision measurementsElectron-Positron Collider- e.g. TESLA
Physics and experience teach us that we need these different tools to answer the open questions and that they complementeach other
The Path to the Experimental Answers
© Physics Today
8Albrecht Wagner
The Power of e+ e-
Colliderse+
e-
• well defined production process, simple kinematics
• precise knowledge of quantum numbers in initial state
• precise (<%) knowledge of the cross sections
• polarisation of e- and e+ beams possible
• energy and momentum of all partons known
• energy of system can be varied• low background
q q µ µ
9Albrecht Wagner
Test of the SM at the Level of Quantum Fluctuations
Indirect determination ofthe top mass
possible due to
• precision measurements
• known higher orderelectroweak corrections
)ln(,)( 2
W
h
W
t
MM
MM
∝
LEP
10Albrecht Wagner
The Higgs Mechanism andthe Higgs Boson
In the Standard Model the Higgs mechanism is responsible for the generation of mass
• All elementary particles are originally massless• The entire universe is filled by a field• Elementary particles gain their mass through the interaction
with this field• The field gets distorted by the particle -> Mass generation• The field quantum: The Higgs Boson
The Higgs is the last missing element of the Standard Model
11Albrecht Wagner
The Higgs: Key to Understanding Mass
Where is the Higgs?
Mass limits for the Higgs
from precision tests of the SM
114 < m(H) < 206 GeV (95 % CL)
A Linear Collider measures:• mass• quantum numbers• lifetime• couplings= test the mechanism of mass
generation
12Albrecht Wagner
Higgs Branching Ratios
Branching ratios measure the Higgs coupling to fermions,
a test of the Higgs mechanism
accuracy a few %
500 fb-1
at 350 GeV
Marco Battaglia
13Albrecht Wagner
Unification of particles and forces• Eliminates mathematical problems in
SM• Part of quantum theory of
gravitation
• consequence: many new particlesevery known particle has a supersymmetric partner
• the lightest SUSY particle is stable, possible link to dark matter
Supersymmetry
Fermions(Bosons)
Bosons(Fermions)
14Albrecht Wagner
• Unification of quantum-physics and general relativity
• Elementary particles = excitations of an elementary string: 10-33 m
• In how many dimensions do we live?
• String theories predict new particles: Supersymmetry
• SUSY scale expected to be close by --> Threshold of a new era
From Particles to Strings
A Linear Collider can measure supersymmetric particles:• masses• quantum numbers• lifetimes• decaysif they exist
15Albrecht Wagner
Extra Dimensions
Emission of gravitons into extra dimensions
+ emission of γ or a jet
measurement of cross sections at different energies allows to determine number of extra dimensions
(500 fb-1 at 500 GeV,
1000 fb-1 at 800 GeV)
cross section for anomalous single photon production
Energy
δ = # of extra dimensions
e+e- -> γG
16Albrecht Wagner
e+e- Colliders:The Challenges
The challenges:
Luminosity: high charge density (1010), > 10,000 bunches/s
very small vertical emittance (damping rings, linac)
tiny beam size (5*500 nm) (final focus)
Energy: high accelerating gradient (> 25 MV/m, 500 - 1000 GeV)
To meet these challenges: A lot of R&D on LC’s world-wide
For E > 200GeV need tobuild linear colliders
Proof ofprinciple:
SLC
17Albrecht Wagner
From SLC to TESLA
SLC TESLA
Energy Ecm 100 500 (→ ~1000) GeV Beam Power 0.04 ~10 MWSpot size IP 500 (~50§) ~5 nm Luminosity 3⋅10-4 3 1034 cm-2 s-1
SLC
FFTB
TESLA
500 nm
50 nm
5 nm
1000 nm
Main challenges:
• Luminosity
• Energy
18Albrecht Wagner
TESLA X-FEL:a revolutionary photon source
The excellent beam properties in the superconducting TESLA-LINAC allow to use the SASE (Self Amplifying SpontaneousEmission) principle
Brillance:gain ~ 109 compared to existing facilitiesPhoton beam:• X-rays at 0.1 nm• Full coherence
(Laser)• Pulse length < 100 fs
(time scale of chemical reactions)
• Energy tuneable
19Albrecht Wagner
How to build an X-FEL?
Self Amplified Spontaneous Emission (Kondratenko, Saldin 1980)
requires small emittance electron beam
• Spont. Emission
• for certain wave lenghts, fulfilling a resonance condition
lasing
20Albrecht Wagner
Properties of the X-ray Laser
• Wavelength of atomic dimensions> 0.1 nm
• Highest brilliance~ 109 times that of sources of the 3. generation
• Very short pulselength100 fs
• Tunable in wavelength • Coherence
Synchrotron radiation power P of an incoherent electron distribution: P ~ Ne
Radiation from a point charge (bunch length < λ radiation): P ~ Ne
2
Gain: ~ Ne = 10 9 ...10 10
21Albrecht Wagner
Science with the X-FEL
Movies of chemical reactions
Main fields of research with the XMain fields of research with the X--FEL:FEL:• atomic, molecular and cluster phenomena, plasma physics• non-linear processes and quantum optics• condensed matter physics and materials science• ultra-fast chemistry and life-sciences Plasma physics
22Albrecht Wagner
Structural Biology (1)
Today: imaging of bio-molecular assemblies with atomic resolution require crystallisation
Classical diffraction from crystal Ribosome Crystals
23Albrecht Wagner
Structural Biology (2)
Tomorrow:
imaging of non-crystaline bio-molecular assemblies with atomic resolution
and on time scales of chemical reactions (femto seconds)
Diffraction from single molecule
Solution:
X-FEL
Lysosyme
24Albrecht Wagner
The Story of SC Cavities
Development of Gradients in superconducting RF cavities
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Year
Gra
die
nt
(MV
/m)
World Average
CEBAF
TESLA
TESLA
TESLA el.polish
SC RF structures for accelerators were developed in many countries
To meet the challenge of high gradients needed for high energy Linear Colliders the TESLA collaboration has attracted ~ all the world expertise in SC, thus leading to major progress
25Albrecht Wagner
The TESLA Collaboration
• The TESLA Collaboration was set up in 1992
- at present 51 Institutes in 12 countries
Original Goals:
Obtain accelerating gradients of at least 25 MV/m (theoretical limit approx. 50 MV/m)Realise a 30 km long Linear Collider with a centre of mass energy of 500 GeV.
26Albrecht Wagner
Challenges for TESLA
• Material propertiesmoderate Nb purity, low Residual Resistance Ratio (RRR), low thermal conductivity, quenches at moderate fields
• Cavity treatments and cleannesshigh pressure rinsing and clean room assembly
• Microphonicsmechanical vibrations in low beta structures
• Multipactoring (MP)MP has been the major limit for HEPL and electron linacs to
1984 • Quenches/Thermal breakdown
because of low RRR and poor purity • Field Emission
General limit before TESLA because of poor cleaningprocedures and material
27Albrecht Wagner
Preparation of TESLA Cavities
9-cell, 1.3 GHz, TESLA cavity
The steps:
Scan of Nb sheets -> inclusionsIndustrial production:
Deep-drawing of half-cells Chemical preparation of weldingElectron beam welding
Heat treatment (8000)-> stress anneal
Heat treatment (14000)-> increase thermal conductivity
Chemical etchingHigh pressure rinsing
28Albrecht Wagner
The Cryo-Module
The layout of one cryo-module – the basic building block of the linear accelerator
One input coupler per cavity
29Albrecht Wagner
Assembly of TESLA Modules: Impressions
Machine cost distribution
Main LINAC Modules
Main LINAC RF System
Civil Engineering
Infrastructure
X FELIncrementals
Damping Rings
HEP Beam Delivery
AuxiliarySystems
Injection Systems
1131
587 546
336241 215
124 101 97
Million Euroe- Beam lines
e- Damping Ring
High energy physics detector &Xray Free Electron Laser laboratory
e+ Main LINAC
Electron sources e+ Source
X FEL Switchyard
Beam dumps
DESY site Westerhorn
TESLA schematic view
Auxiliary halls
~ 33 km
e+ Damping Ring
e+ Deliverye- Main LINAC I PDelivery e-
e+ Beam linePreLinac
Systems Overview
There are more systems to the accelerator than just the cryo-modules ..
31Albrecht Wagner
The TESLA Test Facility
Tasks:
Test of all components
Operation for > 15 000 h
Base for costing
Conclusion:
The technical readiness has been demonstrated
Construction of a prototype accelerator:
32Albrecht Wagner
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1410-12
10-11
1x10-10
1x10-9
1x10-8
1x10-7
1x10-6
1x10-5
1x10-4
E = Esh
exp(z/Lg)
Wsh
~ 1-2 W
TTF FEL saturation September 10, 2001λ = 98.1 nmL
g = 0.68 m
Esat
= 90 µJ
E [
J]
z [m]
Properties of the Laser
Level ofspontaneousemission
All measured properties of the laser agree with the theoretical predictions, e.g. saturation (gain: 10*10^6)by far the most brilliant VUV light source world-wide
@ 100 nm
104 105 106 1070
10
20
30
40
∆E/E = 0.7 %
Single FEL pulse
Inte
nsity
[arb
. uni
ts]
Wavelength [nm]
Simulation
simulation
single FEL pulse
∆E/E = 0.7%
Power: 226 +- 50 MW observed @ 100 nm200 expected @ 70 nm
33Albrecht Wagner
Tunability and Coherence
2/1 E∝λ àTransverse coherence
Also seen in opening angle ofradiation at saturation
Slit distance: 3 mm
34Albrecht Wagner
Interaction of Intense Radiation (100 nm) with Matter
Measurement of
• multi-photon processes
• cross sections
• life time of intermediate states
• Coulomb explosion
as function of intensity
First Experiments at TTF
Increasing intensity
VUV-Laser
35Albrecht Wagner
First Results
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
0,0
0,2
0,4
single shot
average size of clustersN=300
7+6+
8+
5+
4+
Xe++
Xe3+
Xe+
inte
nsity
[arb
. uni
ts]
time of flight [ns]
(Th.Möller et al.)
IpXe = 12.1 eVEphot= 12.8 eV
36Albrecht Wagner
VUV-FEL User Facility at TTF II
RF commissioning in 2003,
start of FEL operation in 2004
TTF 1
TTF 2
experimental hall
37Albrecht Wagner
The Decision of the BMBF
The decisions of the German Ministry for Education and Research concerning TESLA was published on 5 February 2003:
DESY in Hamburg will receive the X-FEL as European project
Germany is prepared to carry half of the 673 MEuro investment cost.
Today no German site for the TESLA linear collider will be put forward. This decision is connected to plans to operate this project within a world-wide collaborationDESY will continue its research work on TESLA in the existing international framework, to facilitate German participation in afuture global project
38Albrecht Wagner
Next Steps for the X-FEL
• Site and some of the technical parameters for XFEL Laboratory are currently reconsidered.
• Formation of European Working Groups under way.
Aim for decision on construction in 2005!
39Albrecht Wagner
Consequences of the Decision for the Linear Collider
Given the decision of the German government the community will now take a path used for other international projects (e.g. ITER): • unite first behind one project with all its aspects, including the technology choice, in 2004 and then • approach all possible governments in parallel in order to trigger the decision process and site selection (2006/2007)Next R&D activities:• Test as many 9-cell cavities as possible, with full power for as long as possible at their highest gradient (35 MV/m). • In order to prepare the construction of the X-FEL, DESY and its partners will focus on issues related to the mass production of all components. This will lead within one to two years to further improvements of the technical design and a better cost evaluation.
40Albrecht Wagner
The Path beyond 25 MV/m
Improvement of cavity surfaces by electropolishing (EP)
First electro-polished single cell cavities
BCP Surface (1µm roughness)
BCP Surface (1µm roughness)
0.5 mm
EP Surface (0.1µm roughness)
0.5 mm
Gradients of 40 MV/m at Q values above 1010 are now reliably achieved in single cells at KEK, DESY/CERN and TJNAF. At DESY EP infrastructure for 9-cell cavities has been commissioned with single cell cavities. 9-cell cavities will follow soon.
41Albrecht Wagner
Cavity Performance
Cavity with all its ancillaries (1/8th of a TESLA cryomodule) under full power
TESLA LC: ready to reach 800 GeV (although beam tests still missing)
42Albrecht Wagner
TESLA Energy Strategy
TESLA luminosity vs. cm-energy, baseline & upgrade
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
E_cm / GeV
L /
10^
34 c
m^
-2 s
^-1
no add. cost
RF & cryo upgrade
Assuming that cavities will reach 35 MV/m:
TDR (March 2001)
Base line design for 500 GeV, upgrade possibility outlined
• initially operate at an energy of about 500 GeV, to explore the Higgs and related phenomena, and then • increasing the energy to 800-1,000 GeV, to more fully explore the TeV energy scale.
43Albrecht Wagner
Other Projects referencing to the TESLA technology
• High Energy Physics– TESLA– Neutrino Factories and Muon Colliders– Kaon Beam Separation at FNAL– New TEVATRON Injector
• Nuclear Physics– RIA – EURISOL– CEBAF Upgrade
• High Power Proton Linacs for Spallation– SNS, Joint-Project, Korea, ESS– ADS for Waste Transmutation
• New Generation Light Sources– Recirculating Linacs (Energy Recovery)– SASE FELs
200 MHz for Neutrinos
SNS
44Albrecht Wagner
Summary
• Very successful development of the superconducting accelerating technology in international partnership
• The activities of the TESLA collaboration have influenced significantly many other accelerator projects
• The European X-FEL laboratory will provide a revolutionary photon source based on the TESLA technology
• Strong world enthusiasm for a LC, aiming at technology decision in 2004
• New ways of international collaboration (Global Accelerator Network) as the basis for future projects