Tesis alumna FUNIBER. Maria Fernanda Osorio - Teaching English as Foreign Language
-
Upload
fundacion-universitaria-iberoamericana-funiber -
Category
Education
-
view
265 -
download
5
Transcript of Tesis alumna FUNIBER. Maria Fernanda Osorio - Teaching English as Foreign Language
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
1
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT – FINAL PROJECT
“Teaching English as a Foreign Language”
UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA
In collaboration with Fundación Universitaria Iberoamericana (Funiber)
Designing Two Units for an Online Course in English for Academic
Purposes
Author: María Fernanda Jaime Osorio
Tutor: Elena Caixal Manzano Code: COFPMTFL927670
Group: 30 Date: August 4, 2013
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction………….……….……………………….………………………....... 4
2. Theoretical background….………………………………...………………...… 6
2.1 Course design for EFL/ESL…………...…..………………….……….…….. 6
2.1.1 Online courses…………………………………….………………….…. 8
2.1.2 Didactic units………………………………………………………..…… 10
2.1.3 Content and activities……………………………………………..……. 12
2.1.4 Learning to learn………………………………………………………… 13
2.1.5 Final task…………………………………………………………………. 14
2.1.6 Evaluation and assessment……………………………………………. 15
2.1.7 The teacher’s book……………………………………………………… 17
2.2 Teaching EFL/ ESL for Academic Purposes………….……..….…………. 17
2.3 Teaching EFL/ ESL with Educational Software………….……...………… 18
2.4 The writing process for descriptive, explanatory,
and argumentative texts…………………………………………………...… 20
2.5 Academic grammar and Academic vocabulary……………………………. 21
2.6 Knowledge about education…………………………………………………. 22
2.6.1 Learning Strategies……………………………………………………… 22
2.6.2 CALL……………………………………………………………………… 22
3. Aims…………………..……………………………………………….…………... 23
3.1 Project aims…………………………………………………………………... 23
3.2 EAP course aims………………………………………..……………………. 24
3.3 Units aims……………………………………………………………………… 24
4. Methodology……………………………………………………………………… 25
4.1 Investigation……………………………….……………….……..…………… 25
4.2 Process for data gathering, analysis and interpretation………………….. 26
4.3 Approach for unit design…….……………………………..…….………..… 26
4.4 Population and students’ needs..………………………..….……....……… 28
4.5 Course structure………………………………………………..……………... 31
4.5.1 Content…………………………………………………………………….. 32
4.5.2 Unit aims…………………………………………………………………... 32
4.5.3 Unit features………………………………………………………………. 34
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
3
4.6 Unit creation process……..…….…………………..………………………… 35
4.6.1 Unit organization and features……………………………………........ 36
4.6.2 Final task…………………... ……….………………………….............. 38
4.6.3 Evaluation……….……………………………….………………………. 39
4.6.4 Learn to learn...……….…………………………..………….…………. 39
4.6.5 Teacher’s book……………………………………...…………..…….… 40
4.6.6 Work plan...…………………………………………………..…………. 41
5. Conclusion……………………………………………...………………....…………… 42
References…………………………………………………………………...……………. 43
Appendices…………………………………………………………………..……………. 47
Appendix I: EAP Course syllabus………………………………………..……… 47
Appendix II: Course syllabus for units 9 and 10…………………..…………… 71
Appendix III: Problem analysis on CM and SLA assignments…..…………… 74
Appendix IV: Problem analysis from Spanish and Portuguese-
Speaking students………..……………………………....…….… 87
Appendix V: Contents unit 9 ………………………………………..…………… 99
Appendix VI: Contents unit 10…………………………………………………… 113
Appendix VII: Student’s book unit 9……………………………………..………. 127
Appendix VIII: Student’s book unit 10….………………………..……………… 144
Appendix IX: Teacher’s book unit 9..………………………….……………….... 164
Appendix X: Teacher’s book unit 10…………………………………………...... 182
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
4
1. Introduction
“The one who studies, but never practices, is like
the one who ploughs but never sows” Plato
Over the last few years, there has been great increase among educational
institutions offering online courses to satisfy their clients’ needs. However few of those
courses take into account those who do not reach the minimum requirements to pass
an entrance test, and end up destroying not only the future opportunities but the
dreams of people who need further help. This Research Project is just one link in the
chain of a series of previous and future works that have been and will be carried out by
a team of people pursuing the constant improvement of an academic offer for students
around the world. It has been created under the philosophy that education should be
available for all and that time or place should be no limit for those who are in search of
knowledge and improvement.
The aim of this project is to design two units for an online English for Academic
Purposes (EAP) course that will help the Funiber’s Teaching English as a Foreign
Language students-to-be reach that minimum academic language and educational
content level required by Funiber institution. Three important aspects will be covered in
this paper. First, the main contributions and up-to-date theories on course design,
teaching EFL/ESL for academic purposes, Moodle, the academic writing process, and
knowledge about education on learning strategies and CALL will be reviewed to
support the theoretical framework on which this research project is based. Second, the
aims of the project, the course in which the units are based, and the units will be
established. Finally, the unit design and the methodology used will be outlined, all the
same as the students’ profile, and the detailed work plan to carry on the project.
Moreover, my personal interest to develop this project relies on the conviction that
developing an English for Academic Purposes course means to center in what students
learn and how we meet their needs. I have been a teacher for about 5 years and along
my career, I have also taught English for Specific Purposes to different professional
people including physicians, psychologists, engineers, teachers, secretaries and police
officers. Few years ago the available material to teach those students was minimal and
sometimes almost inexistent. I had to design material to fulfill their needs and more
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
5
than once I found myself studying the vocabulary, reading news and articles on the
matter in order to bring meaningful material to the class.
All the same, I am currently teaching English as a Foreign Language at the Institute
of Languages at Surcolombiana University in Huila - Colombia. There, I teach English
to students who are doing their major in different fields and that see Academic English
use as a key aspect to succeed in their near future career, so I considered this
Research Project a great opportunity to benefit my students, to enrich my experience
as a teacher and material designer, and to share my abilities to work in group, personal
motivation, problem solving skills, and a high sense of responsibility with the group
participating in the development of such important two fields of major interest
nowadays: English for Academic Purposes through Distance Education and
Technology.
Lastly, I would like to express my deepest thanks to God and my beloved husband
and daughter who have been the driving force in my life and all the projects I have
successfully culminated. Likewise, I would like to thank my tutor, Elena Caixal, for her
valuable and constant feedback and guidance, and the designer team group of the
Funiber EAP Course Funiber who like me, devoted their time and effort to complete the
design of the course. I would also like to thank the TELF Master programme Funiber
tutors for giving me the theory and the opportunity put it into practice into a real world
project like the one I have participated on. Finally, I could not but acknowledge my
family (Parents in law, mother, brother and sister) unconditional support during these
two years from the beginning until the end of my master.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
6
2. Theoretical Background
This project is based in several important aspects: course design, teaching EFL/ESL
for academic purposes, teaching EFL/ESL under the e- learning software platform
Moodle, the academic writing process for descriptive, explanatory and argumentative
texts, academic grammar and academic vocabulary, and knowledge about education
on learning strategies and CALL. In the following paragraphs the main topics and
contributions on these fields will be reviewed in order to carry out the plan, and
implementation of this project.
2.1 Course Design
Designing a course implies making choices and taking different steps to
subsequently develop a language curriculum. Richards (1997, p.1) states that the
language curriculum development is “concerned with principles and procedures for the
planning, delivery, management, and assessment of teaching and learning”. This is
certainly a not simplistic view of the process required to successfully accomplish an
effective language teaching and / or learning. To make our teaching task easier, it is
thus necessary to divide the process of curriculum development into five steps: “needs
analysis, goal setting, syllabus design, methodology, and testing and evaluation” (ibid,
p.1).
When planning a unit, there is not much difference in relation to the steps we take.
We start designing a course or a course unit by considering our students’ needs and
context, and end up by assessing and evaluating it. According to Lowe (2001), there
are seven steps to plan a course unit: Identify needs, create a students’ profile,
determine unit topic, establish the goals, select the skills to be developed, brainstorm
the learning activities, and plan and carry out the evaluation of the unit and the
students.
Moreover, teachers have reasons to plan a course and its lessons. Among others,
Woodward (2001) suggests the following:
• Thinking things through before you teach helps to reduce feelings of uncertainty or
panic, and inspires you instead with a sense of confidence and clarity.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
7
• It can inspire confidence in students who pick up a feeling of purpose, progression
and coherence.
• It helps you to understand what research you need to do.
• It reminds you to marshal materials beforehand, and makes it easier for you to
organize the time and activity flow in classes.
• Working on planning after lessons, as well as before, ensures that the class you are
teaching gets a balanced mixture of different kinds of materials, content, and
interaction types throughout the course.
• Course and lesson planning help you to develop a personal style since they involve
sifting through all your information, resources, and beliefs, and boiling them all down to
a distillation for one particular group, time and place. This distillation, together with
what happens in the classroom, represents a cross-section of the present state of your
art.”
(Ibid, p.181)
Although sometimes we have the chance to design a course and its units, there are
other times in which we can only adopt or adapt them taking into account the particular
needs of the institution to which we serve. The units’ (to be designed in this project)
main objective is to have students develop different tasks in order to achieve language
learning and the development of the Communicative Competence. The most important
skill to be developed is writing, specifically, academic writing (descriptive, explanatory,
and argumentative texts), through the use of correct grammar and accurate academic
vocabulary.
In recent decades, there have been several approaches which made their
contribution in learning how to interact with people from other cultures, based on the
principles of communication. This concept not only implies the statement of our own
ideas, taking into account others’ opinions and being respectful to them, but also
means taking turns to communicate feelings, thoughts and body language. According
to Rico (2004) in Evaluación por Competencias – Lenguaje – Idiomas – Lenguas
Extranjeras (María Jaime, Trans.), one of the most relevant approaches that
emphasises language as a means of communication is the Communicative Approach.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
8
“From this perspective the learning process become meaningful in an appropriate and
effective way”, he states.
One of the most effective strategies to develop the communicative competence is
according to Nunan (1989), the use of tasks. A pedagogical perspective defines tasks
as ‘the activity or action that is carried out as the result of processing or understanding
language’. Richards et al. (1986) claim that the use of tasks in language teaching
provides the activities a purpose that goes beyond the mere practice of the language
and achieves a more real communication. Furthermore, Nunan (1989) considers a
communicative task as “a piece of classroom work which involves learners in
comprehending, manipulating, producing or interacting in the target language while
their attention is principally focused on meaning rather than form”.
The use of communicative tasks is an excellent tool to develop the communicative
competence since it makes our students reflect on, appreciate, and implement
communicative behaviors not only within the context of a foreign language classroom,
but also in the real world where sometimes they find it useless.
To sum up, the units proposed in this project work are based on the five steps
suggested by Richards (1997), and on the use of communicative tasks to develop the
communicative competence, specifically related to academic writing of descriptions,
explanations, and argumentations with proper grammar and academic vocabulary.
2.1.1 Online courses
Few decades ago, the governments of the world decided to invest profuse amounts
of money and resources to improve technology and its use among educational
institutions, especially, in higher education institutions. Thirty years ago, it would have
been impossible to write about online education not only because there were no
personal computers available, but because technological abilities were not considered
as fundamental skills at that time.
With the emergence and subsequent shift towards Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT) as the predominant paradigm in English Language Teaching (ESL),
Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) was recently introduced as the use of
computers in teaching and learning English aspects. Hines (2012, para. 4), states that
“these aspects include how instructional materials are presented to students, how
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
9
students engage the instructional content, and how their understanding of the lesson
concepts are assessed”. Since power point presentations, video clips, interactive
language tests, interactive games, e-mails are used to teach students, CALL has
become increasingly popular within the ELT classroom.
These technologies have become of such importance over the last decades, that
during the World Conference about Higher Education in 1998, the Organización de las
Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO) claimed that
the use of the ICTs (Information and Comunication Technologies) is crucial to support
the educational and investigation processes in higher education.
One of the main outcomes of such claims and investments could be no other than
the initiation of online education. MacAnally-Salas (2004) affirms that “online education
is a modality in process of evolution and definition, so we can consider it immature”.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to recognize that it has brought paradigm changes such
centering education in learning instead of teaching, and subsequently, the arrival of
terms such online learning, cooperative and collaborative learning, and academic
community.
To define online education, it is necessary to define e-learning, a term first
coined by Rosenberg (2001) in which he refers to the use of internet technologies as a
provider of an ample range of solutions that improve knowledge and that works under
three fundamental criteria:
1. Networking: To make it instantaneously recent, saved, recovered, and
distributed, and to permit share instructions or information.
2. Internet standard technology use: To be given to the final user through the use
of computers.
3. Ample vision of learning: It goes beyond traditional paradigms of capacitation.
MacAnally-Salas (2004) also insists that “an online course, in the best of the cases,
combines the pedagogical and technological abilities of an educator in an integral
design that obtains the best pedagogical result from those available tools in the
learning environment used”. Nowadays scholars mention the knowledge society and
expect that teachers and students succeed in it through the use of technology to teach
and learn. Online education becomes then, of vital importance as a paradigm to follow
in the design of this research Project.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
10
2.1.2 Didactic units
Unit planning is crucial when developing an online or any course. It focuses on
learning and the language standards are integrated, preventing tutors from focusing on
class activities that do not accomplish the proposed aims. By planning the units, tutors
as well as learners can be aware of the objectives to be achieved and assess their
progress. It also gives them both the opportunity to manage the time and articulate
their previous knowledge to what they are going to learn during the specific amount of
time given.
A didactic unit is the “intervention of all the elements that intervene in the teaching-
learning process with an internal methodological coherence and over a determined
period” (Altúnez et al. 1992, p. 104). It can also give the “answer to all the curriculum
issues: What to teach (objectives and contents), when to teach (organized sequence of
activities and contents), how to teach (activities, organization of the space and time,
materials, and didactic resources), and the evaluation (evaluation criteria and
instruments); all of that in a clearly delimited time” (MEC, 1992, 87 o 91, in Cajas Rojas
de Infantil o Primaria).
In other words, it can be said that a didactic unit is a basic unit of programming that
follows a sequence of organized elements. As explained before, Lowe (2001) claims
that there are seven steps to plan a course unit: Identify needs, create a students’
profile, determine unit topic, establish the goals, select the skills to be developed,
brainstorm the learning activities, and plan and carry out the evaluation of the unit and
the students.
In identifying the needs of the students, it is necessary to conduct a survey which
will determine why the learner needs to learn English, and its language needs. By
creating the student’s profile, a comparison between the assessment and the needs
can be made, and as a result, the unit topic can be determined. Once the topic is
determined, the goal of the unit is selected and written as a rational in which what the
unit is about, and what the learners will know and be able to do, is explained.
Lowe (2001) states that when planning the goal these points must be considered:
• Decide what the students should learn and be able to do both in class as practice
and how they will use the skills when leaving the classroom.
• Summarize what you intend the learners to know about the topic and be able to do
in a few sentences or a short paragraph.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
11
• Check that your goals are consistent with those of the course and are level
appropriate.
(Ibid, p.57)
To write the appropriate objectives, behavioral terms to describe what learner will do
need to be used. Objectives must be consistent with the unit goal. Then the activities to
be developed can be chosen. Activities should be appropriate to learner’s level and
must reflect goals and objectives, all the same must be the materials.
Once all the above have been planned and selected, it is necessary to think about
how to evaluate student’s learning and progress during the process in order to meet
the designated goals and objectives. The evaluation can be on going (or formative) or
final (or summative), and they may include activities such the realization of
communicative tasks, tests, or a final product. In the next paragraph Lowe (2001)
describes the purpose of the unit planning and points to advantages when doing the
process of planning:
“The purpose of unit planning is to connect the competencies, language
standards, and skills together so that it creates a unified picture for the students.
Instructors are able to group language standards across skills to integrate with
the competencies at the students’ level. The competencies are the subject
matter/topic or theme for the unit and are the same competencies used in the
CASAS assessments. In the end, unit planning saves the instructor time and
energy when planning lessons.”
(Ibid, p.58)
All in all, to develop the aims of this project work, planning units 9 and 10 for the
English for Academic Purposes online course is one of the key points. Therefore,
literature on this issue was reviewed and taken into account. For successful planning
and performance, the unit content and activities must be carefully selected. In the
following section we will see the criteria underlying their correct selection.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
12
2.1.3 Content and activities
General contents and activities are based on the English for Academic Purposes
(EAP) Research Project by Caixal (2011), in which she proposes contents that have a
connection with education and that are organized in a way that resembles the Teaching
English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) Master Program. EAP course students-to-be
will develop real-life small tasks through their participation on the forum and other tools
selected to make a participative course and a collaborative learning environment.
Additional readings and exercises will be provided to those low-track students or those
who want to go further in their knowledge acquisition and practice.
The contents will be written by the tutor and they will have clear instructions so
students find it easy to complete the tasks for each unit. Time schedule will be also
provided to students for them to plan the time they will spend on each activity.
Caixal (2011) proposes that the contents of the EAP course will have the following
characteristics:
Abundant collaborative learning.
All the tasks will have a connection with Education.
Assessment and tasks: different types of texts and activities, as well as exams
and questionnaires, self-assessment and collaborative assessment.
Assessments will be adequate and easy to understand, thanks to the comments,
explanations, pieces of advice and colour-codes used.
Awareness:
- It will enhance language awareness in the student.
- It will enhance proper-writing awareness in the student.
- Students will become aware of their mistakes.
It will promote autonomy, through strategic contents activites.
Revision weeks will be deleted, and substituted by a “final task” week, where
students will review everything done throughout the subject (strategic contents
and topics about Education will also be included here).
The course will be able to be tailored to the students’ needs.
The course will be clearly organised and structured.
There will be many practical activities.
Units:
- Academic and Education related vocabulary will be studied.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
13
- Academic speaking will be studied.
- Advanced grammar will be studied by every student, not only by those who
English is not their L1.
- All the previous subjects of EFA will be also studied, although the contents of
some will be reduced.
- They will be comprehensive to the student’s needs, not comprehensive to the
field.
- Different academic genres will be studied: introduction, description,
argumentation, explanation, etc.
- Formal academic requirements (bibliography, footnotes, font, cover page,
etc.) will be studied.
- How to learn to learn will be studied.
- The aim of the text will be studied.
(Ibid, p.41-42)
2.1.4 Learning to learn
Learning to learn is to acquire meaningful knowledge to use it when necessary. The
Campaign for Learning website authors define 'learning to learn' as “a process of
discovery about learning. It involves a set of principles and skills which, if understood
and used, help learners learn more effectively and so become learners for life. At its
heart is the belief that learning is learnable”.
The Campaign for Learning website authors also explain that by learning to learn
students get awareness of:
o “How they prefer to learn and their learning strengths
o How they can motivate themselves and have the self-confidence to succeed
o Things they should consider such as the importance of water, nutrition, sleep
and a positive environment for learning
o Some of the specific strategies they can use, for example to improve their
memory or make sense of complex information
o Some of the habits they should develop, such as reflecting on their learning so
as to improve next time.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
14
The Europe Education Council (In Hoskins & Ulf, 2008) asserts the following
definition of the concept learning to learn:
‘Learning to learn’ is the ability to pursue and persist in learning, to organise one’s
own learning, including through effective management of time and information, both
individually and in groups. This competence includes awareness of one’s learning
process and needs, identifying available opportunities, and the ability to overcome
obstacles in order to learn successfully. This competence means gaining,
processing and assimilating new knowledge and skill as well as seeking and making
use of guidance. Learning to learn engages learners to build on prior learning and
life experiences in order to use and apply knowledge and skills in a variety of
contexts: at home, at work, in education and training. Motivation and confidence are
crucial to an individual’s competence.’ (Education Council, 2006 annex, paragraph
5).
The European Council recently defined ‘learning to learn’ as a key competence that
all individuals should develop in a globalized society. Hoskins & Ulf (2008) explain that
learning to learn can be measured by learning outcomes which have been called
competences and that are usually a combination of knowledge, skills, attitudes and
values. They also refer to key competences as “those competences which are
quintessential necessary throughout the life for continuing to gain employment and be
included within the everyday life activities including those of civil society and decision
making.” (Ibid, p.12)
Learning to learn also means to develop autonomous learning on students; in other
words, learners must combine values, attitudes and knowledge to build the capacity to
solve problems and to learn new things. The units 9 and 10 will be framed under the
paradigm of making students aware of their own strategies to learn and create activities
to expand and improve them in order to foster learning.
2.1.5 Final task
Since units 9 and 10 are enlighten by the task-based learning approach, activities
and tasks will parallel as closely as possible the real world because the language is
conceived as a vehicle to develop the task; furthermore, we concentrate on language
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
15
form and on its meaning. The main activities lead students to use language in normal
communication circumstances.
As established by Caixal (2011) ‘we learn through exploration and active
engagement.’ These units have the purpose to develop communicative competence
through communicative tasks. Furthermore, Skehan (1988, in Leaver and Willis, 2004)
explains that communicative tasks show simple but fundamental characteristics:
Meaning is primary.
There is an established, communicative goal.
The activity is outcome-based.
The task has a real-world relationship
The final task in both units will be communicative tasks they are given as the result
of previous tasks that will enable the student to become competent at communicating
in a written way. In fact, is Wilkins (1976) who proposes tasks to be presented on an
approximation approach, meaning that smaller preparatory tasks should be the
preparation for a more comprising task or product.
Furthermore, the final task is framed under the idea that students will use the same
process in future communicative situations. Task Based Learning (TBL) relies on the
learners experimenting with their knowledge and using skills of deduction and language
analysis to exploit the situation. Thus, students will be prepared to achieve the final
tasks not only by presenting previous tasks, but by making them aware of the language
they need in order to successfully carry it out as well. That is the reason why language
focus on academic grammar and academic vocabulary will be introduced in each one
of the two units. The materials to be used will be selected and adapted from authentic
resources so the learners will be exposed to authentic language use.
2.1.6 Evaluation and assessment
Martín Peris (2001) emphasises that to promote autonomy and learning, students
need to be provided with tools. Thus, for the purpose of evaluating students, they will
be given different types of micro tasks that will prepare them to complete the final tasks
on each unit. Different types of assessment will be also practiced during the course so
students not only will learn from their tutor, but from other students’ experiences and
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
16
will have the opportunity to help others as well by contributing to their learning
processes.
Among the tasks students will need to complete in units 9 and 10, there are those of
writing descriptive and explanatory paragraphs, writing about specific education topics
(CALL and Learning Strategies), participating in forums and discussions about their
own learning strategies, analyse articles, and do reflective thinking activities such
creating a chart in which they measure the time they take to learn or forget a lesson’s
contents. Tasks will be mainly communicative (Ball, 2010a), which means they will
focus on meaning rather than on form. Academic grammar and vocabulary tasks will be
embedded into the communicative ones in order so students can communicate better;
these kinds of learning tasks will be proposed because they get very close to the
communicative aims of the units.
Consciousness - raising tasks, focused-communication tasks, and interpretation
tasks will be also part of the units. These three approaches permit learners focus on
both, communication and form (Ellis, 1993), and thus, communicate their ideas in a
precise and concise manner. Consciousness-raising tasks will help learners to figure
out how the language works and the reasons why they have made mistakes. Students
will then participate in forums in which they will have to analyse other students’ writings
and find their mistakes, understanding why they made them and suggesting ways to
prevent them to happen again. Through focused-communication tasks, students will
perform tasks with ‘more accurate output’ (Nuboyoshi & Ellis, 1993). Tutors who ask
students for clarifications, provide opportunities for them to build inner knowledge about
the language and how to become a better user of it. All the same, interpretation tasks
will provide students with manipulated input containing examples of the structures we
want to teach (Ellis, 1993), thus, readings and activities will try to make students aware
of academic grammar and vocabulary issues while learning about educational topics as
CALL and Learning strategies.
On the other hand, in the case of assessment, students will be assessed through
different kind of activities to reach their learning styles and needs, permitting them to
develop an autonomous learning. For example, summative assessment checks if the
student has learnt the contents of a unit, subject or course (Martín Perís, 1997-2008.),
in this way, the units will be organized in a way students will need to use the knowledge
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
17
they have acquired through the unit contents and over previous units, so they can
perform a more difficult final task.
Another form of assessment to be used on the units is co-assessment. This kind of
assessment permits students to help each other and learn in a collaborative way.
Through forums, google docs, and other tools, students will provide and be provided
with opinions to enhance the knowledge on the studied topics and the way they learn
them. Besides summative and co-assessment, formative and self-assessment will be
also promoted during the development of units 9 and 10. The former allows the tutor to
check students’ learning processes, monitor their interlingua, and detect possible
problems and their causes (Martín Perís, 1997-2008); and the later allows learners to
reflect on their own learning processes, and identify their weaknesses and strengths.
2.1.7 The teacher’s book
Caixal (2011) explained that “The tutor designing the unit will write a teacher’s book
for those units with guidelines on: the aim of the unit, how to introduce it to the student
(what will need to be written in the Forum about the unit), how to correct the final tasks,
and when and who to give the extra tasks and readings to…”
According to the Guía didáctica de Cardón, the teacher’s book is the total book that
is addressed to the teacher among the several possible components of a manual
(student’s book, workbook, teacher’s book, among others) in a foreign or second
language course. Moreover, the same author defines the didactic guide as the
explanations given to the teacher in order to orientate and give suggestions about how
to carry out the activities and contents of the student’s book and other components of a
manual for a foreign or second language course.
2.2 Teaching EFL/ ESL for Academic Purposes
English for Academic Purposes EAP is a term coined back in 1974, but it was not
until 1975 when it became of more general use. This term “is concerned to the
development of those communication skills in English which are required for study
purposes in formal education systems” (ETIC, 1975), in other words, students taking an
EAP course prepare themselves to respond to those challenges posed by the
academic community in its formal setting. These courses “may include formal teaching
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
18
programmes, self-access situations, distance-learning materials or CALL (Computer
Assisted Language Learning” (Jordan, 1997, p. 2). Jordan also suggests that these
courses can be taught by native speakers of English or by non-native English speakers
in short on long programmed units which can vary from 6 to 12 hours to 6 to 12
months.
Based on the development of skills, an English for Academic Purposes course has
many components, among others there are, listening and note taking, academic
writing, reading comprehension and note taking, reference and research skills, and
academic speech. These courses can take place under different circumstances: in
English speaking countries, in countries where English is taught as a foreign language
(EFL), or in countries where English is taught as a second language (ESL). In the last
two settings classes are monolingual and English is usually taught by non-native
English teachers. This might be advantageous for students if we look at the knowledge
that teachers may have about the context and the particular students’ sociocultural
background, but it can also bring some disadvantages in relation to the knowledge that
these teachers have about the academic environments abroad. Whether being or not a
native speaker, an EAP teacher must be an EAP expert in order to succeed in his/her
task.
The units to be designed under the parameters given in the EAP course are
targeted to students in both, ESL and EFL contexts. We use ESL to describe the
setting in which “students are living in the target language community and who need
English to function in that community on a day-to-day basis”, while EFL refers to the
context in which “students are studying general English at schools and institutes in their
own country or as transitory visitors in a target-language country” (Harmer, 2007, p.
39).
2.3 Teaching EFL/ ESL under the e- learning software platform
Moodle
Moodle is understood as Modular Object Oriented Distance Learning Environment.
It can also be described as “a free, open source software package designed using
sound pedagogical principles, to help both educators and researchers create effective
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
19
online learning communities. It is quite useful and convenient to set up with some basic
databases on a server, and it is possible to teach any class or provide interactive Web
pages using it on any Web server platform that supports PHP” Nozawa (2011).
Moodle is currently used by many universities and institutions to teach several and
different courses around the world. According to its own statistics, up to 2010 there
were over 48,000 active sites, 3.5 million courses, and 35 million people from 211
countries that use this system. This e-learning software platform was created by
Dougiamas in 1998 under the philosophy called SCP (Social Constructionist
Pedagogy). According to him, “social constructivism happens when the learner is
engaged in constructing something for others to see”, (in Nozawa, 2011).
Although Moodle was not designed to teach languages, it has been reported to be a
great teaching-learning tool to develop language skills, and there are profuse amounts
of educative institutions currently offering their online languages courses based on this
platform. It is exactly because it is so popular that Moodle technical features were
made easy to understand and its surface is user-friendly.
Suvorov (2010) states that this software “consists of a set of tools that allow for the
integration of a wide range of assignments, activities, multimedia resources, electric
delivery of teaching materials, synchronous and asynchronous teacher-student and
student-student communication, and testing and assessment of student’s work”,
characteristics that make it an advisable tool for writing classes. Among others, Moodle
has the next tools:
• Forums • Chat rooms • Assignment
• Glossary • Data base • Wiki
• Workshop
Most of the listed activities promote collaboration among teachers and students at
different levels. Being collaborative in nature, the Moodle platform permits active
participation and interaction allowing students to co-construct writing in a social way.
According to Brown (1994), “the heart of communication” consists of learner-
centeredness, collaboration, and interaction, so by accomplishing these characteristics,
Moodle is a great tool to develop the principles of Communicative Language Teaching
(CLT).
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
20
As well as is communication features, Moodle also permits pre- writing, drafting,
revising, and editing during the writing process, allowing the learner to notice how
he/she has developed his/her own process, and being aware of their learning
strategies and those ones which best help them to obtain better results.
2.4 The academic writing process for descriptive, explanatory, and argumentative texts Human beings usually communicate their ideas by means of written texts. Writing is
assumed to be a skill which should be taught to every literate person during their formal
education at school. It is just then, when students start to write for different purposes
and for a specific audience. Their academic texts include descriptions, explanations,
and argumentations, among others.
Montolío (2009, p. 22) affirms that “academic texts pretend to inform and convince”,
but not all of them are written with the same purpose. According to the author,
academic texts’ style and structure depend on the effect the writer wants to reach on
the reader. For example, while some texts pretend the reader to understand and/or
learn a concept; some others seek to convince the reader about a theory or a
hypothesis, or simply to make him/her interested in an unknown topic. Thus, according
to their purpose and concerning to units 9 and 10 main topics, the academic texts to
treat in this Research Project are: Description, Explanation, and Argumentation.
When describing, an author creates images on the readers’ mind, permitting them
imagine or visualize in vivid detail and with a sense of order, whatever object, person,
place, or idea is being described. According to Axelrod and Cooper (2004, p. 647),
there are three basic techniques for writing a successful description: naming, detailing,
and comparing. While naming refers to “call the readers’ attention to observable
features of the subject”, detailing is about making those features “more specific or
particularized”. Additionally, there is comparing, which can be done through simile and
metaphor and is used to make a description “more vivid to readers”.
Besides description, there is also explanation as an academic text. An explanatory
text, also called expository text by some authors, is a text in which the writer conveys
and clarifies information that is difficult to understand. According to The Purdue Writing
Lab (2012), an expository essay “is a genre of essay that requires the student to
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
21
investigate an idea, evaluate evidence, expound on the idea, and set forth an argument
concerning that idea in a clear and concise manner”. This type of text requires the
writer to have an impersonal voice. He/she does not give any criticism or argument, the
writer just elucidates the subject and with an objective tone, explains the reader what is
difficult for him/her to grasp.
Even though explanatory texts serve primarily to illustrate readers about a subject,
Axelrod and Cooper (2004) affirm that “college students are required to write
explanations not primarily to teach others but to demonstrate what they have learnt” (p.
201). For them, there are several strategies to write this type of text including definition,
classification, comparison and contrast, cause and effect, and process narration. These
are the main strategies to be developed during the course of academic writing.
Another academic written discourse is Argumentation. Arguing a position is
considered an academic text which objective is to convince the reader to accept or
reject a particular position on a controversial issue by giving plausible reasons
supported by reasoned arguments. According to Axelrod and Cooper (2004), in order
to be a convincing text, it also has to anticipate reader’s likely objections and opposing
arguments. Moreover, The Purdue Writing Lab (2012) affirms that these types of
papers “generally call for extensive research”. Thus, it “allows the student to learn
about a topic…., choose a position and support it with the evidence collected during
research”.
2.5 Academic Grammar and Academic Vocabulary
Although the three types of academic texts in units 9 and 10 are description,
explanation and argumentation, there are two significant funds to be taken into account
and taught during these two weeks as well: Academic grammar and Academic
vocabulary. None of the writings will be taken seriously if not written with appropriate
grammar and concise vocabulary. Students taking the EAP course will learn some
basic grammar and vocabulary during the first weeks; consequently, units 9 and 10 will
concentrate on developing the correct use of sentence structure, nominalization,
referencing, impersonal expressions, modal verbs, verb tenses, precise verbs, and
coherence and cohesion by using linking words and phrases.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
22
2.6 Knowledge about Education
Caixal (2011) proposes that students taking the course will get basic knowledge
about education issues. Units 9 and 10 will include contents about two specific topics:
Learning Strategies and CALL, respectively. If these topics are previously introduced
within the units, it would be easier for students to study them in depth during the TEFL
masters. The pedagogic texts on these two topics will introduce the main topics of the
units.
2.6.1 Learning Strategies
Learning strategies are used to help students learn both academic language and
content. They can be defined as “the special thoughts or behaviors that individual use
to learn” (O’Malley & Chamot,). The main objective is to help students to become
independent and to auto regulate their own learning process. There are different types
of strategies and educators must be aware of how to select them in order to produce
the correct effect on the learner:
• Metacognitive Strategies: Used in planning for learning, self-monitoring, and
evaluating achievements.
• Metacognitive Knowledge: Understanding one’s own learning processes, the
nature of the learning task, and the strategies that should be effective.
• Cognitive Strategies: Manipulating the material to be learned through rehearsal,
organization, or elaboration.
• Social/Affective Strategies: Interacting with others for learning or using affective
control for learning.
The essential topic to be treated in unit 9 is the use of the Learning Strategies when
given frequent cues and feedback to students. While reading a Learning Strategies
article, learners will be given examples of academic explanations and descriptions, and
academic grammar.
2.6.2 CALL
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
23
As well as the Learning Strategies topic, learners will be enlighten about CALL by
reading texts on the importance of this matter and how to deal with it in the language
classroom. In recent years, the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
use has become a main topic in education since it has brought great changes to
society. The use of the internet as a tool for communication permits the intercultural
relationships among the countries in relation to politics, socio-economics and
education; as a consequence, tutors for online courses usually find intercultural
classrooms, as well.
Teachers from all over the world face situations in which computers are the tools and
the internet is the media to learn. The EAP course, to which units 9 and 10 are part of,
is actually an example of it. This is one of the key arguments to introduce this topic
related to real-life expectations of the target population to whom the units will be
designed for. Unit 10 will include texts related to CALL in the language classroom as
the pedagogic topic to introduce academic argumentations and academic vocabulary.
3. Aims
In this section, the aims of this project will be presented in three groups: Project
aims, which describe the general goals of this project work; the EAP Course aims,
which describe the broad aims of the course the two units to be designed are part of;
and finally, the Unit aims, which describe the competences students who successfully
complete the units will acquire.
3.1 Project Aims
• Design two units for the syllabus of an online course in English for Academic
Purposes (EAP.)
• Put into practice the knowledge acquired in the Master on Teaching English as a
Foreign Language (TEFL).
• Create and provide solutions to the individual academic writing problems and
needs to the participants of the EAP course.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
24
3.2 EAP Course Aims
According to Caixal (2011), the general aims of the EAP course lead the students to
be able to:
• Reach the necessary proficiency in English (or Spanish) for Academic Purposes as to
cope with the language contents (use of language, writing skills and the ability to
discuss pedagogical issues) required in the TEFL (and FOPELE) programme.
• Develop linguistic awareness; that is, explicit knowledge about the language, and
perception and sensitivity towards learning, teaching and using it.
• Reflect upon their mistakes as a means of detecting and solving problems.
• Become an autonomous learner, and keep on learning well after the course.
(Research Project (RP), 5.3.1, General aims)
3.3 Unit Aims
• To develop specific academic writing skills related to descriptive, explanatory and
argumentative texts on students who lack of linguistic and content knowledge
requirements of the Funiber TEFL program.
• To identify, analyze, and characterize the student profile and design two units that
can tackle their needs to successfully help them acquaint the linguistic and content
knowledge requirements of the Funiber TEFL program.
• To provide all the participants with tools and tasks to successfully learn the contents
of the two designed units and develop their academic writing skill.
• To promote reflective and autonomous learning on students through the use of
learning strategies, communicative tasks, and cooperative work.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
25
4. Methodology
In this section, the methodology of this project will be introduced by the investigation
paradigm, the process for data gathering, analysis and interpretation, the approach for
unit design, the analysis of the population and their needs, and finally, the course
structure and unit creation process will be presented.
4.1 Investigation
This research project will be framed under the paradigm of Curriculum Investigation-
Action. According to MacKernan (1999), the curriculum investigation action takes place
when a professional analyze documents in order to investigate any aspect of the
curriculum. He also explains that the analysis helps to improve the learners’ evaluation
and it can be made through the examination of the next documents:
Former tests,
Official update documents about evaluation,
Documents by the government that establish parallels to follow,
Alumni assignments,
Standardized tests,
Alumni evaluation tests records,
Official curriculum guides,
Others.
(ibid, p. 13)
By examining the information in the former documents, the teacher or researcher
creates a list or schema of the backgrounds and the context in which the investigation
will take place. This process can lead to the research questions of the research project
and its development. All the same, the final document will be read by other
professionals at the end of the investigation. Thus, it must be carefully written and
supported.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
26
4.2 Process for data gathering, analysis and interpretation
The information for this research project will be gathered from different sources. The
main source to be taken into account is the research project by Caixal (2011) to which
units 9 and 10 belong. The author mentions that in order to gather the information to
design the EAP course, she asked tutors and students their opinion about the course
and the aspects to be improved. The main purpose of her research was to create the
EAP course. Now, in order to create units 9 and 10 for the EAP course, there is a four-
step process to consult and recollect the information.
First of all, there is need to consult texts related to the creation and design of units,
tasks, online courses, final tasks, and learn to learn. Secondly, texts about the main
topics of the two units will be consulted: academic writing, explanations, descriptions,
argumentations, and academic grammar and vocabulary.
A second step to follow is to analyze TEFL assignments and theses to look for the
main problems students show in relation to academic writing including grammar and
vocabulary. The analysis purpose is to tackle the students’ problems through the
design of extra exercises and readings to different learning styles and mother tongues.
The teacher’s guide will also be created and along with the others, they will be adapted
to the virtual e-learning platform Moodle. The work plan will be further illustrated in
5.6.8.
4.3 Approach for unit design The approach to design units 9 and 10 is based on three main focuses: Task-
based, student centered learning and collaborative learning. Each one of these
paradigms is crucial to the successful understanding and meaningful learning of the
students taking the EAP course.
Tasks-based course
The task-based approach is based on the idea that people learn through exploration
and active engagement. According to Ellis (2003), a task has the following criteria
features:
A task is a workplan.
A task involves primary focus on meaning.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
27
A task involves real-world processes of language use.
A task can involve any of the four language skills.
A task engages cognitive processes.
A task has a clearly defined communicative outcome.
Ibid (p. 9-11)
Since Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) aim is to develop the ability of
students to use the language for real communicative purposes, task-based learning
serves to CLT strong version, where tasks are seen as a vehicle to enable students to
learn the language by experiencing it for real communication. In units 9 and 10 learners
will have the opportunity to learn through communicative tasks which lead them to
create a final product. The process to create the final product is more important than
the product itself; thus, students will elaborate outcomes for real-life purposes, getting
immersed in the use of the language for communicative purposes.
Student-centred learning
Collins & O'Brien (2003) explain that in student-centered instruction, students are
who influence the content, activities, materials, and pace of learning. They also explain
that while the center of the learning process is the student, the instructor supports and
provides students with opportunities to interact and develop their skills. When correctly
implemented, this approach is believed to improve learning through motivation,
understanding and positive attitudes. According to Di Napoli (2004), there are certain
characteristics that make Student-centred learning a useful method to follow:
• Students are not considered to be empty vessels. They come with their own
perceptual frameworks.
• Focus is not just on what is taught but on how effective learning should be promoted.
• Student learning becomes the main preoccupation of the teacher (not his/her
performance as a teacher or a raw number of facts to be transmitted to the students).
• It is recognized that students learn in different ways and have different learning styles.
Personalized / individualized responses are encouraged. This helps to foster creativity
in students.
• Learning is recognized as an active dynamic process in which connections (between
different facts, ideas and processes) are constantly changing and their structure is
continually reformatted.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
28
• Assessment is ‘formative’ in character.
• Syllabi and curricula are organized around the processes through which learning is to
be developed.
(Ibid, p. 3-4)
Therefore, both units (9 and 10) will make echo of the annotations of Collins &
O'Brien (2003), and Di Napoli (2004). Students’ needs will be taken into account in the
construction of the activities. Making a flexible unit structure will be favorable for
students who have different problems, levels and languages. In consequence,
selection of readings, tasks, and extra activities and exercises will also recognize
students’ profiles, as well as their learning styles.
Collaborative learning
As the student-centred learning model considers the student the most important
actor of the learning process, creating a collaborative learning environment facilitates
students’ interaction and consequently, non-traditional experiences to improve their
skills and create group knowledge construction. Smith & McGregor (1992) defined
collaborative learning as an “umbrella term” for a variety of educational approaches. It
involves work and efforts by teachers and students to develop understanding, and
students are the key actors who discuss and construct knowledge through interaction.
When designing the tasks, a more social framework will be taken into account and
many of the tools provided by the online software Moodle will help the tutor to organize
a collaborative environment for learning to take place.
4.4 Population and students’ needs
Although the participants may have similar needs and interests, their cultural and
learning backgrounds, and learning styles are likely to be different. So it is important to
bear in mind that students may come with their own experiences and attitudes, and will
follow their own method to succeed. Thus, two strong elements to be developed in the
course and consequently in the two units are, as explained before, a learning to learn
component which will help them to identify their own learning styles, and a collaborative
learning approach through which they will help each other to enhance their own
learning strategies.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
29
Students’ profile
According Caixal (2011), student’s profiles are stereotypical because most of them
could belong to “more than one profile at the same time and at different levels”. She
classifies students’ profile in the following way:
a) Students with language problems: These candidates are divided into two groups:
Those whose language level is lower than a B2, and those whose level is very close to
C1. Among their main errors we find: grammar, vocabulary, register, and spelling
problems.
b) Students with poor knowledge about education: These applicants do not have
previous experience as teachers, have not studied educational-related courses and/or
have been out of the field for many years and their knowledge is very out-of-date.
c) Students lacking writing and academic skills: These students are also divided into
two groups:
• Firstly, we find those candidates with writing problems: reading and understanding,
ideas for text writing, coherence, typography, punctuation, paragraphs and sentences
building, etc.
• Secondly, candidates with a lack of academic writing knowledge. For example, they
are not familiar with formal requirements (bibliography, length, font, etc.), writing
resources (rhetoric, syntactic games, etc.), and different academic texts (introduction,
conclusion, explanation, etc.)
(Caixal, 2011, p. 31-32)
Students’ needs
This material was specifically designed in order to fulfil student’s needs and the
academic writing skill for descriptive, explanatory, and argumentative text with proper
grammar and academic vocabulary in a total time of 10 hours per unit from Monday to
Saturday during two weeks.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
30
As stated before, this research project will be framed under the paradigm of
Curriculum Investigation-Action. This paradigm permits the evaluation of documents to
find the needs of students in order to improve their academic performance. According
to Thornbury (n.d.), it in EAP courses where the needs analysis can be particularly
acute. The same author proposes (based on Munby, 1978) to gather information under
the following categories:
1. Learner: The units are designed for professional students who are interested in
improving their academic writing skills. Caixal (2011, p. 33) states that “Most of the
participants come from non-English Speaking countries and from different
educational traditions. That means that their writing culture (the way they express
ideas, how they write, which topics are taboo, etc.) differs greatly from that of the
English Speaking World”.
2. Purpose and domain: Students taking units 9 and 10 of the EAP course aim to
improve their academic writing skills in order to be part of the Master in Teaching
English as a Foreign Language offered by FUNIBER.
3. Setting: According to its official website, the Ibero-American University
Foundation´s (FUNIBER) purpose is “to spread and share the European and Ibero-
American knowledge”. This institution was founded in 1997 in Barcelona, Spain,
and since then, it has become an academic and professional network providing
experience and knowledge to give equal opportunities for international first-level
education. One of the Masters offered by FUNIBER is Teaching English as a
Foreign Language, specially targeted to those teachers who devote their lives to
teach the language. This program relates theory to practice and stimulates
autonomous and collaborative learning with constant support by its tutors.
Based on the Research Project Designing an Online Course in English for
Academic Purposes by Elena Caixal (2011), these two units belong to a fifteen-unit-
course designed by the author to fulfil the requirements to obtain her title for the
TEFL program. The target population are the applicants that had not passed the
Entrance Exam to reach the required language level to enter the Funiber TEFL
programme. The two units will be developed by means of the virtual platform
Moodle under a task based approach.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
31
4. Interactans: Teachers and students will interact among them by completing tasks.
The tasks of these units promote whole group work, small group work
(discussions), pair work (peer revision and suggestions), and individual work
(developing the macro skills of reading and writing, and their micro skills) through
communicative tasks. It also promotes the use of technology and tools from the
web 2.0 (forums, e-mail accounts use).
5. Mode: Students will basically interact through receptive and productive writing.
6. Skills and Functions: Studying reference material and reading current literature
about the educational topics Learning Strategies and CALL in order to introduce
academic descriptions, explanations, argumentations, grammar, and vocabulary.
7. Proficiency: The units aim to achieve a B2+ level according to the Common
European Framework for Languages.
In order to attain students´ academic writing needs, about 50 students’
assignments will be evaluated as well.
4.5 Course structure
According to Caixal (2011) the EAP course to which units 9 and 10 belong, follows
the following structure:
Before the course: Students get a fail in the Entrance exam for the TEFL
Funiber Program. Students will be informed about the course and will decide
whether taking it or not in order to proceed with the register.
Introductory Tasks: Once the student has registered, he will be given the
student’s guide with all the information about the course as well as introductory
tasks to perform during the first week. These tasks are related to the correct
use and familiarization to the Moodle platform and its components to
successfully communicate and complete the tasks.
Course: Once completed the first week students will begin the first subject and
subsequently they will continue the course during 13 more weeks. During the
process they will be in constant communication with tutors and will collaborate
with other students to carry out the proposed tasks. After they have completed
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
32
the total number of subjects, they will do a final task that summarizes what they
have learnt during the unit.
Final Project: During the last week of the course, students will do the Final
Project where they need to show their learning process.
After the course: Once students have proved they reached the desired
language level and have received their certificated, they will begin the TEFL
program.
A graphically explanation of the above the EAP course to which units 9 and 10 are
part of, is referred in Appendix I.
4.5.1 Content
The general content of the EAP course is divided into fifteen units which will last 10
hours each. As explained before, this is a collaborative project. A group of work will
receive the general course structure and will design the content, the student’s book
with extra activities and exercises, and the teacher’s book. To complete this purpose,
the designers will complete two analysis based on actual TEFL student’s assignments
provided by the coordinator of the project. Once more, to graphically explain the above
the EAP course, refer to Appendix I.
4.5.2 Units aims In relation to the specific units 9 and 10 aims, Caixal (2011) also proposes the
development of linguistics skills, general writing skills, and academic writing skills.
According to her, in relation to linguistic skills and academic skills, at the end of the
units 9 and 10 the student will be able to:
• From a grammar standpoint, the student will be able to use correctly:
- Become proficient at English or Spanish grammar rules.
- Be familiar with complicated grammar problems.
• From a vocabulary standpoint, the student will be able to master:
- Acknowledge the importance of vocabulary.
- Learn technique to increase the quality of the vocabulary used.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
33
• From a strategic contents standpoint, the student will be able to master:
- Talk about past English or Spanish learning and writing experiences (it must be
taken into account that English or Spanish may be their mother tongue, and, so the
student can talk about the L1 classes he/she has at school or how he/she learnt
his/her L1 through his/her family).
- Learn to learn.
- See his/her most used strategies.
- Develop autonomy.
• Write academic projects about:
- Current education issues debates and discussions.
- Case studies activities.
- Tasks-solving activities.
- Analyze and do reflective thinking activities.
- Materials design.
• From a “description” standpoint, the student will be able to:
- Describe a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
• From an “explanation” standpoint, the student will be able to:
- Explain a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
• From an “”argumentation” standpoint, the student will be able to:
- Argue consistently.
- Convince the reader.
(RP, 5.3.2, Specific aims)
In order to achieve these general and specific aims, it is essential for the tutor to use
academic articles in which students can identify proper grammar rules and vocabulary
use, as well as to analyze writing strategies to develop a description, an explanation,
and finally an argument in an organized and structured way. The tutor will also explain
the basic features for each one of the academic texts by means of a writing guide.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
34
Students will be then guided through the process of writing individually and/or
collaboratively. A specific topic on Learning Strategies (for unit 9), and CALL (for unit
10), along with a logical plan to present the text will be assigned.
At the same time, by means of a forum, and before submitting the assignments,
students will discuss and reflect on plausible reasons for an argument, concepts found
on different sources, and how to use senses to describe. Not only critical thinking but
supporting reasons and research will be needed to give and get feedback to and from
classmates generating thus, collaborative and meaningful learning.
4.5.3 Unit structure
Each one of the fifteen units is organized to follow the same structure. Based on
Tano (2008), Caixal (2011) proposed that each unit needed to follow the next pattern,
for visual information on units 9 and 10 structures, please check Appendix II:
Cover: The student will be introduced to the main topics of the units and will
activate his/her previous knowledge on the matter. Basic information about the
final task and the contents, time and resources to complete the unit is also
given.
Language in context: Students will be provided with authentic texts to introduce
the main topics of the units. These texts will permit the student work on his/her
knowledge about Learning Strategies (unit 9) and CALL (unit 10), while at the
same time they are being introduced to the genres, description, explanation,
and argumentation.
Knowledge Bank: Here, students will find a systematization of functions of the
language the units deal with.
Check your knowledge: In this section, students will be provided with a series of
self-evaluated tasks in which they will practice what they have learnt.
Communication: The final task is expected to be completed in this section. The
final task will assess not only the educational topic of the unit and its main
contents, but it will also include knowledge they have acquired in previous units
of the course, for example, planning a task or advanced grammar.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
35
Additional readings: This section contains easier-than-the contents additional
readings to be used by the tutor according to students’ needs. These readings
aim to provide opportunities to broad understanding on the unit’s topic,
especially to those students who have been identified to have different mother
tongues. The additional readings are self-assessment tasks.
Additional exercises: These exercises provide three different levels of exercises
starting with an easy to a more difficult one. These exercises are also aimed at
students with different mother tongues. The additional exercises are self-
assessment tasks.
4.6 Unit creation process
The process for creating the two units has been well - planned and structured by our
project coordinator Elexa Caixal and it was established in her research project (2011).
There was a selection process and each one of the participants had to follow some
steps to successfully complete the unit creation process:
1. Designers were elected according to their performance on the entrance exam.
Thus, designers had to write a short essay in which they described their interest in
participating on the project, and their ability to write academically.
2. Designers were given the course program from which they had to choose two
subsequent units. They were also provided with a schedule with tasks and timing
to be developed during the creation process. The schedule and tasks correspond
to the work plan on 5.6.8.
3. Designers were given the EAP Research Project by Elena Caixal (2011) as the
main source to be followed.
4. The selected group worked on their designs through the collaborative platform
Google groups.
5. Designers read extensively on basic topics and also on the ones linked to the units
to be designed as well as those related to education knowledge to be developed
during on students taking the EAP course.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
36
6. Designers analyzed 50 of the TEFL first assignments looking for the problems
related to academic writing skills and the influence of their mother languages when
writing.
7. Designing of the units started. Designers had to design the unit structure, the
student’s book, the teacher’s book, extra readings and extra exercises structure
and material following the parameters given by the coordinator of the project.
8. Designers uploaded the created materials on the Moodle platform and tested their
efficacy and efficiency to the purpose they were created.
9. Designers finished their Research Project and submitted it.
4.6.1 Unit organization and features
Every activity and task planned for the two selected units follow a structured plan
and rules provided by the project coordinator to make the course coherent with the
sequences used in the TEFL Master. Ball (2011) suggests that when programming
tasks, the programmers should follow some basic rules. Thus, the units are organized
in a way that the students-to-be find it easy to understand and complete. One of the
rules is that the main tool for communication between students and tutors is the forum
and it is through that tool that clear instructions with all the information necessary to
complete the tasks will be posted every Friday by the tutor designing the unit.
Another rule designers will need to follow is the formal requirements to write their
materials which are: Font: Verdana, size: 10 (16 for main titles and 12 for secondary
titles), length: between 5 and 10 pages (not including extra readings and exercises into
account, this can account for 6 extra pages, but not more), line height: 1.5, and
alignment, Word Format and PFD format. Moreover, they will contain between 3 and 6
self-evaluated tasks that will be given feedback by Moodle when completed. This
feedback will be written in another Word document with the same formal requirements.
Besides the two first mentioned rules, the two units are divided into six
components which are: Cover, Language in context, Knowledge bank, Check your
knowledge, Communication, Additional readings and additional exercises. All the
same, the teacher’s book has also four components which are: Previous observations,
Before starting, Assessment, Additional tasks.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
37
For a more visual perspective, units 9 and 10 and its components will be presented
in the appendixes. Each one of them compresses the following information:
Appendix I: Course syllabus. This table shows the course structure and the parts to
be designed. The course contains 15 units and it is the base document of this
research project.
Appendix II: Course syllabus for units 9 and 10. Even though they are contained in
Appendix I, it is necessary to separate the units to be designed. Units 9 and 10 deal
with academic writing skills development as well as the use of academic grammar
and vocabulary.
Appendix III: Problem analysis on CM and SLA assignments. The table contains the
problems related to academic writing and the use of academic vocabulary and
grammar in the CM and SLA assignments of current students of the TEFL master
program.
Appendix IV: Problem analysis from Spanish and Portuguese-speaking students.
This document presents the current mistakes that students make when writing due
to the influence of their mother tongues. This analysis helps the designer to
implement extra readings and extra exercises for those students whose mother
tongues interfere with their ability to write academically descriptions, explanations
and argumentations.
Appendix V: Contents Unit 9. The table contains the components and the specific
design of the unit. Each one of the components contains objectives, contents,
abilities and activities to be developed by students and tutors.
Appendix VI: Contents Unit 10. The table contains the components and the specific
design of the unit. Each one of the components contains objectives, contents,
abilities and activities to be developed by students and tutors.
Appendix VII: Student`s book Unit 9. This is the material which students of the EAP
course will be provided by in order for them to accomplish the goals proposed on the
appendices V and VI.
Appendix VIII: Student`s book Unit 10. This is the material which students of the
EAP course will be provided by in order for them to accomplish the goals proposed
on the appendices V and VI.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
38
Appendix IX: Teacher`s book Unit 9. This document is the tutor’s tool to help
students to develop the course. Its components are included and its different
sections generate an organized way for the tutor to help his/her students develop
the units’ contents. Extra reaing and exercises are suggested for those students
who might have problems during the progress of the units. Answers to the exercises
and activities will also be found in this paper.
Appendix X: Teacher`s book Unit 10. This document is the tutor’s tool to help
students to develop the course. Its components are included and its different
sections generate an organized way for the tutor to help his/her students develop
the units’ contents. Extra reading and exercises are suggested for those students
who might have problems during the progress of the units. Answers to the exercises
and activities will also be found in this paper.
4.6.2 Final tasks
The final task for units 9 and 10 is writing a 250-word essay. Students will choose a
topic from a list given by the tutor. For unit 9 the text must include descriptive and
explanatory paragraphs in which students will make use of the academic grammar and
precise vocabulary learnt during the unit. For unit 10, the text must include arguments
with plausible reasons to convince the reader about a point of view. Both documents
must be sent to the tutor in order to assess the product and provide feedback.
It is necessary to make clear that for the final task the tutor will follow the task-based
approach, so this task will parallel an activity that they normally use in communicative
circumstances. To complete these tasks, students would previously have developed
smaller tasks such writing paragraphs or completing self-assessment readings and
exercises. Focus on language and meaning will be also key premises to be taken into
account when writing each essay. The formal requirements to be fulfilled when writing
the final task are: Length: 250 words, Type of font: Arial or Times New Roman, Size:
11, Line height: 1.5, Alignment: Justified. The final tasks for units 9 and 10 are
referred in Appendices VII and VIII.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
39
4.6.3 Evaluation
The units’ evaluation will take place all over the time the units last (10 hours per
each) and will have different presentations. Active participation by students is expected
in every single activity since they are beneficial for academic language learning.
Previous micro tasks will prepare students to complete the final task, allowing them to
have a better chance to succeed in the course.
In unit 9 students are asked for participation in two forum activities, two self-
assessment activities and three individual activities to be sent to the tutor’s mail for
feedback. All the same, unit 10 proposes five self-assessment activities, one
collaborative writing wiki and an individual activity to be sent by mail. The self-
assessment activities are consciousness – raising tasks and the collaborative and
individual activities are focused – communication tasks. Consciousness – raising tasks
will also take place in those activities in which students will be asked to clarify what
they have interpreted about any of those activities, thus, students will build inner
knowledge about the language and how to become a better user of it.
The forum activities and the creation of a wiki will permit co-assessment, since
through these tools for nature students have to create collaborative content and post
their opinion to build knowledge. Formative assessment will be also carried out by
means of the feedback the tutor will provide students once they have submitted their
assignments. All the same, for the final task in both units, the tutor will carry out a
summative assessment where not only he/she will take into account the units’ acquired
practical knowledge, but the practical applicability of the contents from former units.
Finally, when self-assessing themselves, students will deal with the identification of
their strengths and weaknesses, especially with the topic of Learning Strategies.
4.6.4 Learn to learn
Each one of the units contains five sections related to the development of students’
ability to pursue and persist in learning, also called ‘learn to learn’. Their aim is to make
students aware of their own learning process so it becomes significative and leads
them to be independent learners. The activities will develop autonomous learning on
students; in other words, they will build the capacity to solve problems and to learn new
things.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
40
At the very beginning of unit 9, students will have to plan their learning by identifying
what they already know about the unit and what they want to find out. Then at the end
of the unit, they will have to check if they accomplished their objectives by comparing
the first to columns of the chart with the last ones, which ask them to write what they
actually learnt and how they learnt it. In this unit they will also identify their reading and
writing strategies and will propose ways to improve their own and others’ learning
strategies.
In unit 10, students will have to activate their previous knowledge by anticipating the
content of the unit. They will also identify and evaluate the efficacy of their memory
when remembering what they have learnt, as well as the strategies they use to
remember their lessons. By completing these tasks, students will have the chance to
receive suggestions and suggest others ways to overcome the problem of forgetting
what one has learnt. At the end of the unit, students will complete a ‘now I know’
checklist to self – evaluate their progress on the unit.
For both, units 9 and 10, additional readings and exercises are also activities in
which a component of ‘learn to learn’ is included. Here, students will complete the tasks
to consolidate and enhance their knowledge on the strategic contents of the unit. For a
more graphically explanation, please consult Appendices V and VI.
4.6.5 Teacher’s book
The teacher’s book for units 9 and 10 will be designed as a general basic guideline
which can be enriched and adapted to the specific needs of future teaching-learning
contexts in which the units will be delivered. According to Caixal (2011) the guidelines
for the teacher’s book will follow the following pattern:
Prievious observations: the aim of the unit, all the contents and tasks.
Before starting: the instructions the tutor will post in the Forum. Please check the
first paragraph.
Assessment: the way the assessment will be carried out.
Additional tasks: when and who to give the extra tasks and readings to.
Ibid, (p. 57)
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
41
5.6.6. Work Plan
The work plan is the list of activities and schedule in which the design, elaboration
and implementation of the two units will be carried out. There is a list of actions,
activities and their distribution in time taking into account that the project will last for
one year.
ACTIONS
ACTIVITIES
A/2012 B/2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dic
Bibliography
Reading
Reading the TEFL Project
by Caixal (2001).
Reading about unit design,
tasks and final tasks, online
courses, and learning to
learn topics.
Reading about planning and
pre-writing, general writing
skills, academic writing,
description, explanation,
argumentation, CALL and
Learning Strategies.
Unit Design
TEFL assignments and
thesis analysis looking for
the main problems the
students show for
description, explanation,
argumentation, grammar
and academic vocabulary.
Unit design according to
chart given by Caixal (2001)
Extra exercises and extra
readings design according to
different student’s profiles.
Additional reading search or
design per unit.
Teacher’s book design.
Material
adaptation
to the
Moodle
Platform
Upload the design materials
to the Platform.
Research
Project Writing
Research project will be
written throughout the year
taking into account the
deadlines given by the
TEFL Master Program to
hand out the advances of
the project.
The final project will be
submitted on Sep/13.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
42
5. Conclusion
As I mentioned in the introduction of this RP, the design of units 9 and 10 for the
EAP course is just a small but important link. They both make part of a fifteen unit
course which has a bigger objective. Through this time I have put into practice the
theoretical knowledge acquired during the Master on TEFL, so I have had the chance
to learn more and to improve my skills as a designer and a team worker.
Units 9 and 10 for the EAP course are well structured because they follow unit
design principles that not only take into account the specific population’s needs, but
the e-learning software in which they are going to be developed by those students. I
can state that this Research Project has met its aims (see 3.1 Project Aims):
• Design two units for the syllabus of an online course in English for Academic
Purposes (EAP.)
• Put into practice the knowledge acquired in the Master on Teaching English as a
Foreign Language (TEFL).
• Create and provide solutions to the individual academic writing problems and
needs to the participants of the EAP course.
One of the major difficulties I found when designing the unit was the amount of time
it takes to complete the package of student and teacher’s book, and extra readings and
exercises, especially in the creation of extra readings and exercises, since most of
them were completely designed by me. Likewise, despite my personal belief of this
being a fructiferous and complete project work, I think that every group of people has
different needs and in consequence, the tutor in charge of the development of these
two units must take into account that there might be activities which need further work
or that can be not appropriate for students taking the course. Also, I think that changes
and improvements can be made to the lay out to make it more attractive to those
students whose learning style is more visual.
Moreover, I would like to point out that this is only a design which needs to be
implemented and developed, so further action-research will be needed to evaluate the
efficacy of the design. I would personally like to be part of the team that will implement
and evaluate these two units so I can improve whatever needs to be improved in this
project work.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
43
Bibliography
Axelrod R. B. & Cooper C. R. (2004). The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing. Short 7th
edition. Bedford/St. Martin’s
Baker J. , Brizee A. & Angeli E. (2012). Expository Essays. The Purdue Writing Lab.
Retrieved on March 28, 2012, from
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/02/
Baker J. , Brizee A. & Angeli E. (2012). Argumentative Essays. The Purdue Writing
Lab. Retrieved on March 28, 2012, from
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05/
Ball, P (2011a): “Tasks and Projects”, in MA Teaching English as a Foreign language
(TEFL.) Funiber. [online]
Ball, P (2011b): “CALL”, in MA Teaching English as a Foreign language (TEFL.)
Funiber. [online]
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy. Prentice Hall Regents.
Caixal, E. (2011). Designing an Online Course in English for Academic Purposes.
Retrieved Marzo 25, 2012, from RedELE.
Collins, J. W., 3rd, & O'Brien, N. P. (Eds.). (2003). Greenwood Dictionary of Education.
Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your Coursebook. Heinemann. Oxford
Di Napoli (2004), What is Student Centred Learning? Educational Initiative Centre,
University of Westminster. Retrieved from
http://www.westminster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/41782/StudentCentre
dLearning.pdf
Ellis, R. (1993): Second Language Acquisition Research: How Does It Help Teachers?
ELT Journal 47/1, pp. 3 -11.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford. Oxford
University Press. Retrieved from
http://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=coO0bxnBeRgC&oi=fnd&pg=P
R7&dq=task+based+learning&ots=sUz114uCzW&sig=pONuo91HhY4ZlXBAm3
GxZawjCdI#v=onepage&q=task%20based%20learning&f=false
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
44
ETIC (1975): English for Academic Study: Problems and Perspectives. ETIC
Occasional Paper. London: The British Council.
Fundación Universitaria Iberoamericana. What is FUNIBER? Retrieved from
http://www.funiber.us/about-funiber/what-is-funiber/
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition.
Longman. Retrieved from http://atiyepestel.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/jeremy-
harmer-the-practice-of-english-language-teaching.pdf
Hedge, T. (2002). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Hines, M. G. (2012). Optimizing Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL).
Retrieved on February 22, 2013 from http://www.articlesbase.com/languages-
articles/optimizing-computer-assisted-language-learning-call-5717448.html
ICFES – MAGISTERIO (2004). Evaluación por Competencias – Lenguaje – Idiomas
Extranjeros – Inglés. (María Jaime, Trans.) Bogotá
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for Academic Purposes. A guide and resource book for
teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lowe, A. (2001). Six Step Unit Planning. Chicago: Loyola University. Retrieved on
October 20, 2012 from http://www.dllr.maryland.gov/gedmd/cs/eslcsunit.pdf
MacAnally, L. (2004). Diseño Educativo de un Curso en Línea con las Dimensiones
del Aprendizaje con una Plataforma de Código Abierto. Revista Latinoamericana
de Estudios Educativos, 3er. Trimestre, año/vol. XXXIV número 003. Centro de
Estudios Educativos. Distrito Federal, México. (Trans. María Jaime)
McKernan, J. (199). Investigación-Acción y Currículom. Ediciones Morat., S.L.
Retrieved on August 21, 2012 from
http://eduneg.net/generaciondeteoria/files/Mckernan%20Investigacion-
accion%20y%20curriculum.pdf
Martín Peris, E. (Coord.) (1997-2008): Diccionario de Términos Claves de ELE.
Madrid: Instituto Cervantes [En línea].
Montolío, E. (2009). Manual Práctico de Escritura Académica. Vol II. Ed. Ariel
Practicum S.A. Retrieved on March 25, 2012 from
http://books.google.com.ar/books?id=AE7b76ejy8cC&pg=PA12&lpg=PA12&dq=
manual+practico+de+escritura+academica+ii&source=bl&ots=eMbXsTKkfW&sig
=nO1tc4-
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
45
UMzAQyP4rvFcxdT9nj44&hl=es&sa=X&ei=ecRCT7exNI3qgQfkpM2gCA&sqi=2
&ved=0CF4Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=manual%20practico%20de%20escritura
%20academica%20ii&f=false (Trans. María Jaime)
Munby. J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Nobuyoshi, J. & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused Communication Tasks and Second
Language Acquisition. ELT Journal 47/3 (pp. 203-210).
Nozawa, K. (2011). To Moodle or not to Moodle: Can It Be an Ideal e-Learning
Environment? Journal of policy science, 18(3), Ritsumeikan University, 289-
312. Retrieved from
http://www.ps.ritsumei.ac.jp/assoc/policy_science/183/183_19_nozawa.pdf
Nunan D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language
Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., J. Platt, and H. Weber (1986). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics.
London: Longman
Rosenberg, M. (2001). E-Leaning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital
Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach in Language Learning in Leaver, B. L. &
Willis, J.R. Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practices and
programs) Retrieved from
http://books.google.com.co/books?id=Qbp09ssUz5gC&pg=PA329&dq=online+c
ourses+definition&hl=es&sa=X&ei=0zDuUOS0IYm88ATlu4GYAQ&ved=0CEoQ
6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=online%20courses%20definition&f=false
Smith, B. L. & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is Collaborative Learning? In Goodsell et
al. (1992) Collaborative Learning: A sourcebook for Higher Education. The
National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment at
Pennsylvania State University Retrieved on December 12, 2012 from
http://primarythinking.net/EDGE904/content/Activity%201%20-
%20Reading%201b.pdf
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
46
Suvorov, R. (2010). Using Moodle in ESOL Writing Classes, TESL-EJ, 13(2). Retrieved
on January 24, 2013, from http://www.tesl-
ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume14/ej54/ej54m1/
Thurnbury, S. (n.d). Curriculum and Course Design Module. In Collaboration with
FUNIBER
Wilkins, D. (1976): Notional Syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, T. (2001). Planning Lessons and Courses: Designing Sequences of Work
for the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hoskins, B. & Ulf, F. (2008). Learning to Learn: What Is It and How Can It Be
Measured? Italy: European Communities. Retrieved
fromhttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/979/1/le
arning%20to%20learn%20what%20is%20it%20and%20can%20it%20be%20me
asured%20final.pdf
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
47
Appendices
Appendix I: EAP Course contents
Week 1: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject & Unit: Introductory Tasks
Objectives Main contents Proposed Tasks Proposed assessment
Know how to use the Moodle Campus and make the most of it.
Become a part of a learning community and interact with the tutor and the classmates.
Become familiar with the Moodle Campus and the course schedule.
Focused communication task: Student Guide with tasks that help the student master the use of Moodle, understand the course schedule, aims and tasks, and create a good and collaborative atmosphere among students.
Summative assessment: tasks will be partly assessed automatically by Moodle and partly assessed by a tutor. For instance, those that just check if the student can sail in Moodle can be automatically assessed. But those which help the students interact with each other and the tutor, will have to be assessed by the tutor
Acknowledge the need for an EAP course.
Realise his/her writing problems.
Interpretation task: A commented version of his/her Entrance exam with notes and suggestions from the teacher.
Diagnostic assessment: A short chat or Skype with the tutor about why these are mistakes.
Posible strategic contents Portfolio
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
48
Week 2: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Planning and Pre-writing
Unit: Planning the task, and Generating and organising
Objectives Main contents
Pla
nn
ing t
he t
ask
Know his/her profile as a writer and a learner. Define his/her profile as a writer.
Increase writing awareness. Understand texts better.
Analyse the communicative situation. The addressee. Outline the aim of the text.
Develop cognitive processes and planning writing techniques. See himself/herself as an effective addresser. Follow the instructions. The formal requirements of the text.
Ge
ne
ratin
g
and
org
an
isin
g
How to generate and organise useful ideas for text writing. Methods to generate ideas. Methods to organise ideas.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the the website above:
o Planificación y control del propio proceso de aprendizaje o Planificación
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
49
Ed
uca
tio
n
kn
ow
led
ge
Basic knowledge about: Methodological Approaches.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Reflective learning task: Test about his/her profile as a writer that helps the student talk about his/her relation with English. Consciousness-raising tasks: Analyse texts specially written in order to distinguish between efficient and inefficient texts. Focused communication task: Guided writing exercises where the student has to plan texts where collide different disciplines,
addresses, addressers, time and cultures. Focused communication task: Choose a preferred method to generate and organise ideas about a topic linked with education.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Self-assessment: But the tutor may point out some interesting issues about the test. Summative assessment: Automatic assessment made by Moodle. Co-assessment: With another student, where they both share their analysis. And a final summative assessment by Moodle and
the tutor. Summative assessment: Where the tutor corrects.
Week 3: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Planning and Pre-writing
Unit: Final task
Objectives Main contents
Fin
al ta
sk
Improve the student knowledge about the aforementioned education knowledge content.
¿
Review everything done in the subject
Writing awareness. Strategic contents. Planning the task Generating and organising.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
50
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the the website above:
o Planificación y control del propio proceso de aprendizaje o Planificación o Evaluación y control
Ed
uca
tio
n
kn
ow
led
ge
Basic knowledge about: Classroom Management.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks Focused communication: Reading where the student finds a short summary of the subjects linked with education.
Focused communication and Reflective learning task: Plan, generate and organise the ideas to write a text on what the student wants to improve about his academic skills in this course. The student will be given a sketch where he/she will have to talk about writing awareness, strategic contents, and intertwine this ideas with the information learn through the topics about education.
P
ropose
d
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: The reading will contain self-evaluated tasks. Moodle will give feedback for these tasks but the tutor will be able to add feedback too.
Formative assessment: The tutor will correct the assignment pointing out if the student has followed what has been learned. Language problems will not be yet taken into account.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
51
Week 4: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: General writing skills
Unit: Spelling, Vocabulary and Grammar
Objectives Main contents
Sp
elli
ng
Become proficient at English spelling rules. Be familiar with complicated spelling problems.
Adding -er/-est Adding -ing/-ed Adding -ly Adding -s -ible or -able -ie- or -ei- Varieties of English
Vo
ca
bu
lary
Raise awareness about the importance of vocabulary. Learn technique to increase the quality of the vocabulary
used.
Inappropriate words. Empty words. Crutches. Inkhorn terms. Synonyms and antonyms.
Gra
mm
ar
Become proficient at English grammar rules. Be familiar with complicated grammar problems.
Adverbs and adjectives. Articles. Count and noncount nouns. Prepositions. To + inf. vs. –ing forms. Active and passive voice. Concordation. Word order.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
52
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Procesamiento y asimilación del sistema de la lengua o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
ti
on
kn
ow
led
ge
Basic knowledge about: Second Language Acquisition.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Interpretation task: Text analysis where the student needs to explain the spelling mistakes found and why they are mistakes. Consciousness-raising and Focused communication task: collaborative writing in Google docs. Text analysis where the students
are confronted with some sentences showing typical problems. Focused communication task: Test with the grammar mistakes made by different students during the course. These mistakes
can be picked by the tutor, so that he/she can tailor the exam to the student profile.)
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: Automatic correction made by Moodle. Co-assessment: Together with the rest of the students (on Google docs) improve or not these sentences. Moodle gives an
automatic corrected version. Summative assessment: Automatic correction made by Moodle.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
53
Week 5: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: General writing skills
Unit: Style Guides, and Punctuation
Objectives Main contents
Sty
le
Gu
ides
Learn to use frequent typographic signs. Know when to use capital letters. Use other typographic signs.
Italics. Bolds. Capital letters. Space between characters.
Pu
nctu
a
tio
n
Raise awareness in the student about punctuation. Learn how to punctuate his/her sentences.
Frequent punctuation signs: coma, semicolon, and full stop. Other punctuation signs: colon, quotation marks, parenthesis,
etc.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de la capacidad de cooperación o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
ti
on
kn
ow
led
ge
Basic knowledge about: Materials and Resources in EFL.
Pro
po
se
d T
asks
Consciousness-raising and Focused communication task: Debate on the Forum containing a text where the student is confronted with some sentences showing typical style guides and punctuation problems.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
54
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
e
nt
Summative assessment and Co-assessment: The teacher gives an automatic, commented corrected version.
Week 6: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: General writing skills
Unit: Building sentences, and Building paragraphs
Objectives Main contents
Bu
ildin
g
se
nte
nce
s
. Link ideas. Structure thematic progression. Create complex and proper text structures.
Linking Words. Active style. Irrelevant information. Clarity. Interpolated clauses.
Bu
ildin
g
para
gra
ph
s
Write properly structured paragraphs. Structure all the text paragraphs as a whole.
Typology. How to write them. Common mistakes.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Procesamiento y asimilación del sistema de la lengua o Realización de la tarea
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
55
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Developping Language Skills.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Consciousness-raising and Focused communication task: First the student confronts a text showing typical sentences and paragraph problems. This can be a modified text that another student has written for week 5, for instance.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Self-assessment and Summative assessment: The student first corrects the text, according to his/her previous knowledge. Then he/she reads the materials and corrects his/her correction, and gets feedback from Moodle and/or the tutor.
Week 7: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Characteristics of academic texts, and Formal requirements
Objectives Main contents
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
56
Ch
ara
c. o
f
acad
. te
xts
Recognise the main characteristics of academic texts. Be familiar with its peculiarities and use.
Characteristics of academic texts. Elements of academic texts (introduction,
explanation/exposition/argumentation, and conclusion)
Form
al
requ
ire
m
ents
Quote references and quotations correctly. Use literature effectively through quotations and references.
Use literature effectively through quotations and references, and quote them correctly.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Procesamiento y asimilación del sistema de la lengua o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Individual Factors.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
57
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Focused communication task: Test on the different parts of an academic text and what is contained in each. Focused communication task: Short exercises during the readings with automatic feedback.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: Automatic, commented feedback by Moodle.
Week 8: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Introduction, Conclusion, and Understandability
Objectives Main contents
Un
de
rsta
nd
ab
il
ity
Raise awareness in the student about the importance of readability.
Master the formal requirements asked for when writing and academic text.
Plain language. Visual perception of the text. Funiber formal requirements: font, size, length, line height,
and alignment. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
58
Intr
odu
ctio
n
Introduce an academic task. Characteristics of Academic Introductions. Steps to write and Academic introduction.
Co
nclu
sio
n
Summarise his/her academic task. Characteristics of Academic conclusions. Steps to write and Academic conclusion.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de la capacidad de cooperación o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Tasks and Projects.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
59
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Interpretation task: the student will be given access the aforementioned education knowledge content. Then, he/she will be given the “body” of a text with understandability problems and the student will have to improve it and write an introduction and conclusion.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: all the subjects dealt with until now will be assessed by the tutor, as well and the student’s acquired knowledge about access the aforementioned education knowledge content.
Week 9: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar
Objectives Main contents
Aca
d.
Gra
mm
ar
Master Academic Grammar. Get familiar with some special features of academic grammar.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
60
De
scriptio
n
Describe a case/situation in an understandable and organised way.
Characteristics of Academic descriptions. Steps to write and Academic descriptions. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
Exp
lana
tio
n
Explain a case/situation in an understandable and organised way.
Characteristics of Academic explanations. Steps to write and Academic explanations. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Procesamiento y asimilación del sistema de la lengua o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Learning strategies.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
61
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Interpretation task: the student will be given access to access the aforementioned education knowledge content. Then, he/she will be given a “case” that he/she will have to describe and explain. The case can be about typical grammar problems in learners of English.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: all the subjects dealt with until now will be assessed by the tutor. as well as the aforementioned education knowledge content.
Week 10: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Argumentation, and Academic Vocabulary
Objectives Main contents
Arg
um
enta
tion
Argue consistently. Convince the reader.
Characteristics of Academic argumentations. Steps to write and Academic argumentation. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
62
Aca
d.
Vo
cab
.
Master Academic Vocabulary. Academic vocabulary, related to didactics and/or language
teaching.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de la capacidad de cooperación o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: CALL.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Interpretation task: the student will be given information about a topic linked with education. Then, he/she will be given a controversial topic about it and he/she will have to argue. Using academic vocabulary will be obligatory.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
63
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: all the subjects dealt with until now will be assessed by the tutor, as well and the student’s acquired knowledge about access the aforementioned education knowledge content.
Week 11: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing
Unit: Final Task
Objectives Main contents
Fin
al ta
sk
Improve the student knowledge about the aforementioned education knowledge content.
Basic knowledge about: Observation & Research.
Review everything done in the subject.
Planning and Pre-writing. General writing skills. Academic Writing The aforementioned education knowledge content
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
64
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Procesamiento y asimilación del sistema de la lengua o Evaluación y control
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Observation & Research.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Focused communication: The student will be asked to reread the short summary of the aforementioned education knowledge content.
Focused communication and Reflective learning task: Write an assignment on whether the student is fulfilling the objective that he/she had in week 5, and how he/she could improve his/her performance. Plan, generate and organise the ideas to write the text. The, he/she will have to write an introduction, explanatory, descriptive and argumentative body, and a conclusion. Finally, he/she will have to use academic grammar and vocabulary, formal requirements and intertwine his/her ideas with the studied the aforementioned education knowledge content
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: The readings will contain self-evaluated tasks that the student didn’t need to complete before. Moodle will give feedback for these tasks but the tutor will be able to add feedback too.
Formative assessment: The tutor will correct the assignment pointing out if the student has followed what has been learned.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
65
Week 12: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Revising
Unit: Self-editing
Objectives Main contents
Se
lf-e
ditin
g
Editing. Coherence. Cohesion.
Keep coherence and cohesion in all the parts of the text. Write understandable assignments. Create complex and proper text structure. Develop your ideas in a progressive way, where the link
between them is clearly understood.
Learn to proof-reading his/her text. Be familiar with his/her most common mistakes.
Assess his/her texts. Diagnose his/her mistakes. Act upon those mistakes. Realise the importance of detecting his/her mistakes.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de los factores afectivos o Reparación y ajustes
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
66
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Content Language Integrated Learning.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Consciousness-raising and Reflective learning task: The student will have to self-edit his/her Entrance Exam, but only from a language point of view. The version handed to the student will be the original, without corrections.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Formative and diagnostic assessment: The tutor will correct the assignment pointing out if the student has followed what has been learned, and will suggest help in the areas presenting more problems.
Week 13: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Revising
Unit: Final Task
Objectives Main contents
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
67
Fin
al ta
sk
Improve the student knowledge about the aforementioned education knowledge content
Basic knowledge about: English in the Community.
Review everything done in the subject.
Planning and Pre-writing Academic Writing. Self-editing. The aforementioned education knowledge content.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de los factores afectivos o Reparación y ajustes o Evaluación y control
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: English in the Community.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
68
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Focused communication: Reading where the student finds a short summary of the aforementioned education knowledge content. Consciousness-raising and Reflective learning task: From his/her corrected version of the Entrance Exam, the student will have
to improve its academic contents: planning, academic writing, self-edition and the aforementioned education knowledge content
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: The readings will contain self-evaluated tasks. Moodle will give feedback for these tasks but the tutor will be able to add feedback too.
Formative assessment: The tutor will correct the assignment pointing out if the student has followed what has been learned
Week 14: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject & Unit: Academic speaking
Objectives Main contents
Aca
de
mic
sp
ea
kin
g
Defend his/her Research Task.
Characteristics of Academic speaking. Steps to Academic Speaking. Characteristics of a Research Project or Thesis. Steps to defend a RP or thesis in front of a jury.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de los factores afectivos Reparación y ajustes
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
69
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledge
Basic knowledge about: Curriculum and Course Design.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks Focused communication tasks: The student will have to do a research task on whether he/she has fulfilled the aims of this EAP
course. He/she will have to explain her position and, then, argue the questions posed by the teacher. He/she can talk about what his/her opinion about the course: what he/she has learnt, what he/she would have liked to learn, what has been superficial, and what he/she thinks should be erased.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: The student will defend his/her research tasks through Skype, and the teacher will ask questions. Then, the teacher will give feedback on the student’s academic speaking skills and what can be improved.
Week 15: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject & Unit: Final Project
Objectives Main contents
Fin
al p
roje
ct
Review everything done in the course. Prove his/her improvement. Realise what can be still improved. Become an autonomous learner.
Review everything done in the course. Prove his/her improvement. Realise what can be still improved. Become an autonomous learner.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
70
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Planificación y control del propio proceso de aprendizaje o Evaluación y control
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Assessment and Testing.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks Consciousness-raising tasks: Creation of a portfolio where the student shows what he/she has learnt and reflects upon his/her
own learning strategies and how he/she can keep on improving in the future. Reflective learning tasks: Diagram on his/her most important mistakes in an easy-to-read format that can be printed. This
diagram is to be used as a test to evaluate the student’s future TEFL assignments.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Diagnostic assessment: The tutor will check the two tasks and will give the student tips on how to keep improving.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
71
Appendix II: Course Syllabus for Units 9 and 10
Week 9: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar
Objectives Main contents
Aca
d.
Gra
mm
ar
Master Academic Grammar. Get familiar with some special features of academic grammar.
De
scriptio
n Describe a case/situation in an understandable and organised
way.
Characteristics of Academic descriptions. Steps to write and Academic descriptions. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
Exp
lana
tio
n
Explain a case/situation in an understandable and organised way.
Characteristics of Academic explanations. Steps to write and Academic explanations. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Procesamiento y asimilación del sistema de la lengua o Realización de la tarea
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
72
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: Learning strategies.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Interpretation task: the student will be given access to access the aforementioned education knowledge content. Then, he/she will be given a “case” that he/she will have to describe and explain. The case can be about typical grammar problems in learners of English.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: all the subjects dealt with until now will be assessed by the tutor. as well as the aforementioned education knowledge content.
Week 10: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Argumentation, and Academic Vocabulary
Objectives Main contents
Arg
um
enta
tion
Argue consistently. Convince the reader.
Characteristics of Academic argumentations. Steps to write and Academic argumentation. Develop your ideas further and deeper of show critical
thinking.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
73
Aca
d.
Vo
cab
.
Master Academic Vocabulary. Academic vocabulary, related to didactics and/or language
teaching.
Str
ate
gic
co
nte
nts
.
To choose depending on the objectives of the unit: http://cvc.cervantes.es/ensenanza/biblioteca_ele/plan_curricular/niveles/13_procedimientos_aprendizaje_introduccion.htm
Each unit needs to focus on a different strategic content. Proposed strategic contents for this unit, according the website above:
o Regulación y control de la capacidad de cooperación o Realización de la tarea
Ed
uca
tion
kn
ow
ledg
e
Basic knowledge about: CALL.
Pro
po
sed
Tasks
Interpretation task: the student will be given information about a topic linked with education. Then, he/she will be given a controversial topic about it and he/she will have to argue. Using academic vocabulary will be obligatory.
Pro
po
sed
assig
nm
ent
Summative assessment: all the subjects dealt with until now will be assessed by the tutor, as well and the student’s acquired knowledge about access the aforementioned education knowledge content.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
74
Appendix III: Problem analysis on CM and SLA assignments
Week 9: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar
MASTER ACADEMIC GRAMMAR
Sentence
Structure
“Another problem with this view is that many of the errors made by L2 learners are not based on the L1. Instead, the
problems most often encountered by learners resemble errors made by children during the period of L1 acquisition.”
“She went to the library to buy a book. Grammar. Word order. The place should go in the end of the sentence.”
“When they do not consider English as another subject more.”
“Merrill swain worked in the most controversial area that is Applied Linguistics.”
…the context of learning is one of the most important reasons to help and make faster the process.”
Hedges and
Boosters
“Students listening are certainly a valid technique for presenting new material and it does get students used to hear how
the language sounds and to the correspondence orthography and pronunciation,”
“Obviously the teacher espoused theories should coincide with the class behaviourisms.”
“As a teacher we may have many reasons why we cannot have discipline in our classroom, but it might be our teaching
style.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
75
“Obviously, people know that a natural characteristic in researchers is to test their theories although those ones could be
criticized.”
Faulty
parallelism
“Most institutions spend a lot of money to reinforce formal education on virtual campus in order to guarantee the
improvement and avoiding fossilization of language by means of the feedback of results, pre and post tests, and
progress in learning.”
Impersonal
expressions (It’s
necessary, it’s
good, it’s bad )
in passive.
“It has been viewed that some errors learners make are based on rules of the L1; they are influenced by these rules as
opposed to coming to conclusions based on their cognitive abilities.”
“When the students understand the meaning it is emphasized and language becomes the vehicle for communicating
meaning and messages.”
Modal verbs “Many, if not all, schools will look to structure curricula according to the intelligences, and to design classrooms and even
whole schools to reflect the understandings that Howard Gardner develops.”
“It is a good activity, if the teacher leads and controls the debate but in our case we don´t use it in high school; do you
imagine forty five teenagers debating about something they are not interested in?”
“When we have this kind of students we can have many points to be considered.”
“I am not really sure of what would happen in the future with this approach but what I can say now is that teachers have to
learn how to recognize their students learning styles in order to help them to learn and achieve a good Class
Management.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
76
Wrong tense “It may be that the only use for learnt language is to help us monitor our spontaneous communication”
“In conclusion I believed that learning a second language is a complex process, especially if you are an adult.”
“Last year, I met Pablo, a 14 years old student who I considered was a tremendous disaster since the very beginning. He
is untidy, and his place in class is always surrounded by rubbish, books and files. You cannot avoid looking at him when
you enter in class. I made a big effort not to get mad at him in class…”
EXPLAIN A CASE/SITUATION IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE AND ORGANIZED WAY
Using definitions to explain concepts.
When explaining a concept, the writer seeks to
inform readers about a specific subject. Authors
need to present information efficiently and rely
almost exclusively on established information.
When defining concepts, writers also need to
support their definitions through making use of
expert sources of information. Moreover, the
information used to support explanations needs to
be properly cited and acknowledged.
“The monitor Hypothesis. Krashen refers to the ways used by learners to edit
linguistic forms produced by means of acquired knowledge. In this case the self
monitor could be nearly the same Swain’s metalinguistic function.”
“Second language acquisition is the process by which people learn languages in
addition to their native language(s). The term second language is used to describe
any language whose acquisition starts after early childhood.”
“The Natural Order Hypothesis, supports that language acquisition occurs in a
predictable, universal order, and it is the same for the learning both a L1 and a L2.
Studies have shown that different learners of English as a L2 make similar errors
regardless from which linguistic background they come. Some of these errors
resemble the errors most often made be children when learning their native
languages.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
77
When explaining the Natural Order Hypothesis this
writer mentions studies that have been made on the
matter, but supporting sources or authors to those
assumptions are not established. Not establishing
reliable sources lowers credibility to the writing.
“However, this belief has its criticisms. Very few of these studies have been done,
and only a few grammatical errors have actually been analyzed. Another problem is
that linguists in general have knowledge of very limited languages. With all the
different languages that exist in the world, only a small percentage has been, or
could be, thoroughly studied.”
Using comparison/contrast to explain concepts.
Even though the student who wrote the essay used
comparison and contrast to explain the theories,
there is lack of organization and understanding. The
conclusion is based in his/her own believes and it is
not coherent with the body of the essay, which
makes the paper difficult to understand and
consequently, difficult to believe.
“Just finishing my essay I am saying that both of them have played an important role
for the next researches including teachers. It is really fundamental to know how is a
second language learned or acquired. In my opinion children Acquire L1, L2, L3 in a
natural way as Krashen says because they start acquiring some words, phrases,
sentences even making a lot of form mistakes, they have high motivation, at the
same time they are correcting their mistakes just using the language and receiving a
lot of input, but in adults it is completely different. Our affective filter goes down and
we require doing mental processes becoming conscious our learning because we
analyze, contrast, L1 and L2. Swain’s theory is much more used with adults because
we need to be aware of the gap or lack of understanding and at the same time it
need to be tested by the interlocutor and after doing the reprocess and the self
reflextion the new linguistic knowledge is internalized as a linguistic data.”
Using examples to explain a concept
Examples make a concept easy to understand for
the reader. Examples can be also used to support
definitions or illustrate the subjects in which the
concept can be applied. Even though the writer
states “he is summarizing with clear examples”, we
“Krashen’s theory was one of the most comprehensive of second language
acquisition for the following reasons. He sustained 5 different hypothesis. I am
summarizing them with clear examples:
Second language acquisition is the process by which people learn languages in
addition to their native language(s). The term second language is used to describe
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
78
can observe there is no use of examples or
scenarios in to make the concept clear.
Here, the writer does not explain the Monitor
Hypothesis in an understandable way. The concept
is not concrete. It is not easy for the reader to grasp.
any language whose acquisition starts after early childhood.”
“The monitor Hypothesis. Krashen refers to the ways used by learners to edit
linguistic forms produced by means of acquired knowledge. In this case the self
monitor could be nearly the same Swain’s metalinguistic function.”
DESCRIBE A CASE/SITUATION IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE AND ORGANIZED WAY
Naming, detailing and using sensory description to
give readers an impression of a person or a place
are strategies to illustrate abstract ideas, to make
information memorable, or to support an argument.
In the example, the writer has the opportunity to
leave a dominant impression, a mood or an
atmosphere to reinforce his/her purpose by using
sensory description or setting a scenario in which
the reader can identify. The writer could also evoke
vivid memories of the process by which people in
his/her country acquire or learn the mother tongue.
On the contrary, his/her statements seem not to
have a purpose and are not organized, obtaining as
a result, confusion to the reader.
“From my point of view, when somebody picks language in the environment where
he/she is living, is a way of surviving, because they try to make themselves
understood and it becomes the first way of exposure of language without
considering grammar details. This is the way how infants learn too; That is the
reason why many people consider that the best age to learn English is when you
are a child, I think that it can be, but only if an infant is sorrunded by the English
environment, it means that the child has to listen to his/her parents speaking English
all the time too and his/her parents have to build this environment with English,
using TV series, reading, music, toys, etc. And this is the way how we learn our first
or native language though.”
Week 10: 7 days, 10 hours
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
79
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Argumentation, and Academic Vocabulary
ARGUE CONSISTENTLY
Coherence and Cohesion
When drafting, the writer needs to smoothly move
back and forth between arguments and
counterarguments. There are sentence strategies to
help him/her do so. In that way, writers show
cohesion among the paragraphs and arguments.
One of those sentence strategies in which you use
conjunctions to signal logical relationships is the
concession-refutation move (also called “yes-but”
strategy), but there is no evident use of it.
In addition, the beginning needs to be engaging and
the end must be decisive, memorable or at least,
suggest an alternative. Design features and visuals
(heading, tables, illustrations, etc.) also might help
the writer make a cohesive essay.
Note of the author: I believe most, if not all, of the essays given by Elena and Eugene
are evidence of lack of coherence and cohesion. In order to make an essay coherent,
writers have to draft and evaluate the reasons and supports given, as well as, review
whether the opposing positions and likely objections have been well handled.
Unfortunately, writers seem to ignore the steps to write an essay, obtaining therefore,
incoherent paragraphs and poor cohesion among them.
CONVINCE THE READER
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
80
Presentation of the issue
The titles proposed by these writers are not explicit
in relation to the content of the essay.
“Ability to Learn a Second Language”
“The miracle of language”
“The Two Main Models in Second Language Acquisition”
Stating a position
When writing an argumentative essay, the writer
needs to state a clear position and to do it so; he
must elaborate a main thesis. The main thesis is
usually presented in the first two paragraphs of the
essay.
The first main thesis was in a conclusion paragraph,
after two paragraphs telling an anecdote. In the
second example, the main thesis is given at the end
of the article by the same author. It is not clear and
as it was presented at the end, it has no proper
development. The third thesis is vague.
In the last example, the author assumes that the
reader knows what the main topic is and the main
thesis does not establish the issue.
“…teachers have to learn how to recognize their students learning styles in order to
help them to learn and achieve a good Class Management.”
“For several years foreign language teachers have been engaged in the
investigation of acquisition of language. Becoming bilingual is a way of life no one
can tell you how to learn a foreign language without really trying. The learning of a
second language is a complex process, involving an infinite numbers of variables
such as age, context, motivation, abilities etc.”
“Having done research on these two definitely different theoretical and applied
constructs of Second Language Acquisition, all I, a teacher with certain classroom
experience, can say is that there is some truth in both sides, Swain’s and Krashen’s
takes on SLA.”
“Considering the two versions, we can see that both of them focus on producing
language, and since the concept of Language acquisition has to do with the process
by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive, produce and use words to
understand and communicate, both of them have the same approach.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
81
Using plausible reasons
When arguing a position writers need to use
plausible reasons to support their ideas. The
reasons cannot be merely asserted and
consequently, writers must support them with
examples, statistics, research, authorities on the
issue, or anecdotes.
This essay is based on the writer’s believes and it is
not supported by any authority on the issue.
In this essay the author presents and supports the
topic (Multiple Intelligences) by writing an anecdote
in which he/she discovered the existence of them.
The anecdote is too extensive and does not lead to
a main support of the thesis idea. Some parts of the
anecdote are irrelevant.
Even though the writer mentions the author, he does
“As teacher there are lots of elements you need to take into account when we
become a teacher. To be a teacher you need to have discipline, this is essential in
classroom management. We cannot teach our students if we are not in control.
People all over the world needs to learn that it does not matters what can a job you
may have, it’s important to know you need to have discipline.”
“As a teacher we may have many reasons why we cannot have discipline in our
classroom, but it might be our teaching style. If we aren’t reaching out to our
students, it’s because they are bored, disinterested and with no kind of energy to
learn the language. Another thing that is very important is instruction, in the class
every students have a different ways of learning and understanding instruction,
some may need more than one time explanation, when others just with one is
sufficient. If we are reaching these students by using a variety of methods, they are
motivated and less likely to cause trouble.
Therefore we must set rules with students from the first day of class, so that as
teacher and students together look for the same aim, that is the teacher teach the
L2 and the students acquire the language taught.”
“Last year, I met Pablo, a 14 years old student who I considered was a tremendous
disaster since the very beginning. He is untidy, and his place in class is always
surrounded by rubbish, books and files. You cannot avoid looking at him when you
enter in class. I made a big effort not to get mad at him in class, as he never brought
the notebook, nor the book or a piece of paper where to take notes. However he
was always in class. The first exam came, and Pablo got the best score in the class.
I was astonished. After that I decided to investigate a little more about him and
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
82
not establish the source from which the statements
were taken. (Books, magazines, articles,
websites…)
Not concluding anecdote
Not concluding example
Not a credible source cited. Moreover, the author
actually mentions not to know or not being sure of
what he/she believes, which lowers the writer’s
credibility.
found out that Pablo is member of the National Gymnastics Team. There I
understood that Multiple Intelligences existed and that Pablo would not change
much.
Maybe I could help him in organizing his place in the class, but my strategies were
the ones that should fulfill the expectations of Pablo as he had a different learning
style. In that way a got aware of other students and the effort we all together should
make (students and teacher) to achieve the learning objectives set.”
“Krashen claimed that language which we acquire subconsciously especially when it
is anxiety free is language we can easily use in spontaneous conversation because
it is instantly available when we need it. On the other hand, language that is
“learned” is not available for spontaneous use. It may be that the only use for learnt
language is to help us monitor our spontaneous communication, but then the more
we monitor what we are saying, the less spontaneous we become.”
Moreover, Krashen believes that successful acquisition will take place if the
comprehensible input the learner is exposed to is a little beyond the current level of
his competence (i+1 level). It means that the most useful thing we could do with
students would be to expose them to large amounts of comprehensible input in a
relaxed setting.”
“According to my experience I can say that since the first day when I taught English
for the first time (14 years ago) when I was 18 at a grammar school. The most
important thing is to create the need in your students in order them to feel attracted
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
83
to the language.”
“When they do not consider English as another subject more. You can do what the
author says. Believe it or not, I have been able to use all of the author’s suggestions
in a minimum percentage, and this is because the students don’t feel comfortable to
show their language so sometimes, it is better not to mix them, even though they
belong to the same course because they need a same level to explore and develop
what they are learning.
“Nowadays no matter what the teacher plans to do if there’s not the cooperation of
the students, as students of this masters course we read a lot of theory but let tell
you that English styles of learning change constantly and
we should be up dated instead of applying “theory”, I don’t know but that’s what I
thing as a high school teacher I am , but at college everything changes, because
their need has to do mainly with the obligation of passing 8 levels or getting a
sufficiency diploma and also taking into consideration that they will need this
important language as a part of their life.”
Counterargument
To enhance credibility on the arguments and
supporting ideas, the writer must anticipate
objections. Then, the writer can counterargue by
acknowledging the opposing position and
“In fact, not all linguists believe in the innate capacities to learn a second language
as the most important characteristics. Some researchers place greater emphasis on
the influence of usage and experience in language acquisition. They argue that
context play an important role in language acquisition by speaking to children—often
in a slow, grammatical and repetitious way. In turn, children discern patterns in the
language and experiment with speech gradually—uttering single words at first and
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
84
accommodate or refute it.
The two examples take into account opposing
positions to their thesis, but do not refer to serious
sources to support their counterargument.
eventually stringing them together to construct abstract expressions. At first glance,
this may seem reminiscent of how language is traditionally taught in classrooms. But
most scientists think children and adults learn language differently.”
It has been argued that interaction does not contribute to language acquisition. In
addition, there is evidence that from reading and listening you can promote
language development; the results of Ellis confirm that acquisition is possible
without actually participating in the interaction.”
MASTER ACADEMIC VOCABULARY
In general, there is a lack of knowledge of academic
vocabulary including precise words (verbs,
adjectives, and adverbs) and phrases to be used
when writing an essay or any academic document.
The vocabulary used is not appropriate to the
requirements of an academic document.
Writers usually make use of words they normally
pronoun when speaking. The use of cultural
everyday expressions is also evident.
This topic is relatively new and it is pity that teachers do not take it into account, The
theory of multiple intelligences was proposed by Howard Gardner in 1983 to analyse
and better describe the concept of intelligence.
Many, if not all, schools will look to structure curricula according to the intelligences,
and to design classrooms and even whole schools to reflect the understandings that
Howard Gardner develops. The theory will also be found in use within pre-school,
higher, vocational and adult education initiatives.
When we have this kind of students we can have many points to be considered.
Let me tell you that we have a lot of colloquial phrases which are freely shown in
movies, and this can be very difficult for learners.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
85
Then, how about output?
The motivation is another main point due to students that never receive feedback,
prefer not to talk anymore and this could delay or in many other cases stop the
process of fluency development.
Kristen regards output as a result of acquisition and not its cause.
The Behaviorist Theory, believe that learning a foreign language consists of learners
imitating what they hear and develop habits in the foreign language by repeated
practice.
Student’s independence to use the language freely according to what he or she
thinks is ok.
Well, I really agree in most of what she says about Mixed-ability groups just
because it is a real thing.
I am not really sure of what would happen in the future with this approach but what I
can say now is that teachers have to learn how to recognize their students learning
styles in order to help them to learn and achieve a good Class Management.
It can result a good activity oriented by the teacher. 7. It could be a good exercise
to summarise the class.
I have my doubts about the input students receive (that is language they are
exposed to) will be the same as their intake (that is the language they actually
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
86
absorb). I believe students would take only some of what they are exposed to. That
is why they always need formal teaching to assimilate things at last more deeply.
“Motivation is the basis of everything”, and teachers must feed themselves from the
students mistakes and become stronger to encourage them everyday.
Let’s see this: a sentence is very complex.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
87
Appendix IV: Problem analysis from Spanish and Portuguese-speaking students
Week 9: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar
MASTER ACADEMIC GRAMMAR
Sentence Structure:
This is one of the most common problems when
learning English in a foreign country. Spanish
speakers usually write the same way they do it in
their native language. In Spanish for example, the
order of the adverbs, is not so calculated or do not
depend on grammatical formulations.
“ the problems most often encountered “
“ another subject more”.
“ the most controversial area that is Applied Linguistics”.
“ make faster the process”.
“Another thing that is very important is instruction”
The use of the article the, auxiliary verbs and
prepositions is also a problem when learning any
L2.
“Teacher acts as monitor”.
“The motivation is another main point”
“Students can choose with which part they want to start working with”
“In your students in order them to feel attracted”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
88
Verb-subject agreement “According to Swain, the learner notice what he knows, then tests a hypothesis and
receives feedback, this allow him to know what he learn and the output let him to control
linguistic knowledge. This theory is focus in what the learner needs, because it forces the
learner to find what he need in order to communicate with others and be understood”.
False friends use: In this specific case, the writer
does not recognize the mistake in the sentence.
This is an example of false friends use.
“She went to the library to buy a book. Grammar. Word order. The place should go in the
end of the sentence”.
Sentence Length: Latin Americans usually write a
lot of words to express one idea. Notice in the
example how one sentence is written in 47 words,
with no punctuation
“I am not really sure of what would happen in the future with this approach but what I can
say now is that teachers have to learn how to recognize their students learning styles in
order to help them to learn and achieve a good Class Management.”
EXPLAIN A CASE/SITUATION IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE AND ORGANIZED WAY
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
89
Using definitions to explain concepts.
In general, Spanish and Portuguese speakers use
more than the necessary words and expressions to
explain a concept. Most of the times, the
explanations are not supportive with convincing
reasons or reliable sources.
Authors need to present information efficiently and
rely almost exclusively on established information.
Moreover, the information used to support
explanations needs to be properly cited and
acknowledged.
“The monitor Hypothesis. Krashen refers to the ways used by learners to edit
linguistic forms produced by means of acquired knowledge. In this case the self
monitor could be nearly the same Swain’s metalinguistic function”.
“The Natural Order Hypothesis, supports that language acquisition occurs in a
predictable, universal order, and it is the same for the learning both a L1 and a L2.
Studies have shown that different learners of English as a L2 make similar errors
regardless from which linguistic background they come. Some of these errors
resemble the errors most often made be children when learning their native
languages.”
Not establishing reliable sources gives low
credibility to what it is mentioned.
“However, this belief has its criticisms. Very few of these studies have been done, and
only a few grammatical errors have actually been analyzed. Another problem is that
linguists in general have knowledge of very limited languages. With all the different
languages that exist in the world, only a small percentage has been, or could be,
thoroughly studied”.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
90
Using comparison/contrast to explain concepts.
Even though the student who wrote the essay used
comparison and contrast to explain the theories,
there is lack of organization and understanding.
The conclusion is based in his/her own believes
and it is not coherent with the body of the essay,
which makes the paper difficult to understand and
consequently, difficult to believe.
“Just finishing my essay I am saying that both of them have played an important role
for the next researches including teachers. It is really fundamental to know how is a
second language learned or acquired. In my opinion children Acquire L1, L2, L3 in a
natural way as Krashen says because they start acquiring some words, phrases,
sentences even making a lot of form mistakes, they have high motivation, at the same
time they are correcting their mistakes just using the language and receiving a lot of
input, but in adults it is completely different. Our affective filter goes down and we
require doing mental processes becoming conscious our learning because we
analyze, contrast, L1 and L2. Swain’s theory is much more used with adults because
we need to be aware of the gap or lack of understanding and at the same time it need
to be tested by the interlocutor and after doing the reprocess and the self reflextion
the new linguistic knowledge is internalized as a linguistic data”.
Using examples to explain a concept
Examples should be concrete. They support
definitions or illustrate a concept. If not clear or
concrete, examples may not be easy for the reader
to grasp.
“Krashen’s theory was one of the most comprehensive of second language acquisition for
the following reasons. He sustained 5 different hypothesis. I am summarizing them with
clear examples…
Second language acquisition is the process by which people learn languages in
addition to their native language(s). The term second language is used to describe
any language whose acquisition starts after early childhood.
The monitor Hypothesis. Krashen refers to the ways used by learners to edit linguistic
forms produced by means of acquired knowledge. In this case the self monitor could
be nearly the same Swain’s metalinguistic function.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
91
DESCRIBE A CASE/SITUATION IN AN UNDERSTANDABLE AND ORGANIZED WAY
Once more, the statements on this writing does not
seem to have a purpose, obtaining as a result,
confusion to the reader.
“From my point of view, when somebody picks language in the environment where
he/she is living, is a way of surviving, because they try to make themselves
understood and it becomes the first way of exposure of language without considering
grammar details. This is the way how infants learn too; That is the reason why many
people consider that the best age to learn English is when you are a child, I think that
it can be, but only if an infant is sorrunded by the English environment, it means that
the child has to listen to his/her parents speaking English all the time too and his/her
parents have to build this environment with English, using TV series, reading, music,
toys, etc. And this is the way how we learn our first or native language though.”
Week 10: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Argumentation, and Academic Vocabulary
ARGUE CONSISTENTLY
Coherence and Cohesion
In general, most writings provided by Elena Caixal
and Eugenia Falabella present lack of connectives
and linking phrases.
“For Krashen the acquisition of the language is a subconscious process, the acquisition
occurs as a result of participating in natural and meaningful communication and following
the grammatical structure of the second language. Learners edit their language
performance by means of an internal monitor which uses learned knowledge to do so
(Krashen 1981, 1982, 1985) When a learner receives comprehensible input, which is a
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
92
little beyond of his competence level, acquisition will take place. Krashen, stated that:
Research done over the last three decades has shown that we acquire language by
understanding what we hear and read. The ability to produce language is the result of
language acquisition, not the cause.
Krashen does not agree with the output theory, for him it is not easy that a learner could
notice what he does not know and make hypothesis to modify his output. He says that
providing comprehensible spoken or writing input is necessary for learning a new
language.
The language acquisition is a subconscious process and requires meaningful interaction
in the new language; this process is similar to the process to acquire the first language.
When we acquire the first language means that we learn the structure of the language
and learning the structure of a second language depends of the differences between the
first and the new language. Some features of the mother tongue are more difficult to learn
(Lado provide a comprehensible theoretical treatment and to suggest a systematic set of
technical procedures for the contrastive study of language)”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
93
CONVINCE THE READER
Ability to convince a reader is given when the
writer states a position in the thesis. There is low
credibility on the thesis when vague ideas are
used.
“…teachers have to learn how to recognize their students learning styles in order to
help them to learn and achieve a good Class Management.”
“The point is that the number of students with specific needs is increasing making
them part of the normality so there would not be segregation of low-track students
and there will appear other kind of segregation.”
“The learning of a second language is a complex process, involving an infinite
numbers of variables such as age, context, motivation, abilities etc.”
“Having done research on these two definitely different theoretical and applied
constructs of Second Language Acquisition, all I, a teacher with certain classroom
experience, can say is that there is some truth in both sides, Swain’s and Krashen’s
takes on SLA.”
“Considering the two versions, we can see that both of them focus on producing
language, and since the concept of Language acquisition has to do with the process
by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive, produce and use words to
understand and communicate, both of them have the same approach.”
Using plausible reasons
This essay is based on the writer’s believes and it
is not supported by any authority on the issue.
In this essay the author presents and supports the
topic (Multiple Intelligences) by writing an anecdote
in which he/she discovered the existence of them.
The anecdote is too extensive and does not lead to
As teacher there are lots of elements you need to take into account when we become
a teacher. To be a teacher you need to have discipline, this is essential in classroom
management. We cannot teach our students if we are not in control. People all over
the world needs to learn that it does not matters what can a job you may have, it’s
important to know you need to have discipline.
As a teacher we may have many reasons why we cannot have discipline in our
classroom, but it might be our teaching style. If we aren’t reaching out to our students,
it’s because they are bored, disinterested and with no kind of energy to learn the
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
94
a main support of the thesis idea. Some parts of
the anecdote are irrelevant.
Even though the writer mentions the author, he
does not establish the source from which the
statements were taken. (Books, magazines,
articles, websites…)
Not concluding anecdote
Not concluding example
language. Another thing that is very important is instruction, in the class every
students have a different ways of learning and understanding instruction, some may
need more than one time explanation, when others just with one is sufficient. If we are
reaching these students by using a variety of methods, they are motivated and less
likely to cause trouble.
Therefore we must set rules with students from the first day of class, so that as
teacher and students together look for the same aim, that is the teacher teach the L2
and the students acquire the language taught.
Last year, I met Pablo, a 14 years old student who I considered was a tremendous
disaster since the very beginning. He is untidy, and his place in class is always
surrounded by rubbish, books and files. You cannot avoid looking at him when you enter
in class. I made a big effort not to get mad at him in class, as he never brought the
notebook, nor the book or a piece of paper where to take notes. However he was always
in class. The first exam came, and Pablo got the best score in the class. I was
astonished. After that I decided to investigate a little more about him and found out that
Pablo is member of the National Gymnastics Team. There I understood that Multiple
Intelligences existed and that Pablo would not change much.
Maybe I could help him in organizing his place in the class, but my strategies were the
ones that should fulfill the expectations of Pablo as he had a different learning style. In
that way a got aware of other students and the effort we all together should make
(students and teacher) to achieve the learning objectives set.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
95
Not a credible source cited. Moreover, the author
actually mentions not to know or not being sure of
what he/she believes, which lowers the writer’s
credibility.
Krashen claimed that language which we acquire subconsciously especially when it is
anxiety free is language we can easily use in spontaneous conversation because it is
instantly available when we need it. On the other hand, language that is “learned” is
not available for spontaneous use. It may be that the only use for learnt language is to
help us monitor our spontaneous communication, but then the more we monitor what
we are saying, the less spontaneous we become.
Moreover, Krashen believes that successful acquisition will take place if the
comprehensible input the learner is exposed to is a little beyond the current level of
his competence (i+1 level).
It means that the most useful thing we could do with students would be to expose
them to large amounts of comprehensible input in a relaxed setting.
According to my experience I can say that since the first day when I taught English for
the first time (14 years ago) when I was 18 at a grammar school. The most important
thing is to create the need in your students in order them to feel attracted to the
language.
When they do not consider English as another subject more. You can do what the
author says. Believe it or not, I have been able to use all of the author’s suggestions
in a minimum percentage, and this is because the students don’t feel comfortable to
show their language so sometimes, it is better not to mix them, even though they
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
96
belong to the same course because they need a same level to explore and develop
what they are learning.
Nowadays no matter what the teacher plans to do if there’s not the cooperation of the
students, as students of this masters course we read a lot of theory but let tell you
that English styles of learning change constantly and
we should be up dated instead of applying “theory”, I don’t know but that’s what I
thing as a high school teacher I am , but at college everything changes, because their
need has to do mainly with the obligation of passing 8 levels or getting a sufficiency
diploma and also taking into consideration that they will need this important language
as a part of their life.
Counterargument
The two examples take into account opposing
positions to their thesis, but do not refer to serious
sources to support their counterargument.
In fact, not all linguists believe in the innate capacities to learn a second language as
the most important characteristics. Some researchers place greater emphasis on the
influence of usage and experience in language acquisition. They argue that context
play an important role in language acquisition by speaking to children—often in a
slow, grammatical and repetitious way. In turn, children discern patterns in the
language and experiment with speech gradually—uttering single words at first and
eventually stringing them together to construct abstract expressions. At first glance,
this may seem reminiscent of how language is traditionally taught in classrooms. But
most scientists think children and adults learn language differently.
It has been argued that interaction does not contribute to language acquisition. In
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
97
addition, there is evidence that from reading and listening you can promote language
development; the results of Ellis confirm that acquisition is possible without actually
participating in the interaction.
MASTER ACADEMIC VOCABULARY
In general, there is a lack of knowledge of
academic vocabulary including precise words
(verbs, adjectives, and adverbs) and phrases to be
used when writing an essay or any academic
document.
The vocabulary used is not appropriate to the
requirements of an academic document.
Writers usually make use of words they normally
pronoun when speaking. The use of cultural
everyday expressions is also evident.
This topic is relatively new and it is pity that teachers do not take it into account, The
theory of multiple intelligences was proposed by Howard Gardner in 1983 to analyse
and better describe the concept of intelligence.
Many, if not all, schools will look to structure curricula according to the intelligences,
and to design classrooms and even whole schools to reflect the understandings that
Howard Gardner develops. The theory will also be found in use within pre-school,
higher, vocational and adult education initiatives.
When we have this kind of students we can have many points to be considered.
Let me tell you that we have a lot of colloquial phrases which are freely shown in
movies, and this can be very difficult for learners.
Then, how about output?
The motivation is another main point due to students that never receive feedback,
prefer not to talk anymore and this could delay or in many other cases stop the
process of fluency development.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
98
Kristen regards output as a result of acquisition and not its cause.
The Behaviorist Theory, believe that learning a foreign language consists of learners
imitating what they hear and develop habits in the foreign language by repeated
practice.
Student’s independence to use the language freely according to what he or she thinks
is ok.
Well, I really agree in most of what she says about Mixed-ability groups just because
it is a real thing.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
99
Appendix V: Contents Unit 9
Week 9: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar
Ob
jecti
ve
s
Master Academic Grammar
Describe a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
Explain a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
100
Co
nte
nts
Cover
Learn to learn (Strategic contents
Objectives:
• To understand descriptions and explanations as staples texts of the academic discourse,
• To activate student’s prior knowledge and experience on the matter and assist them to set their goals for this unit.
Content
• Text: Appreciating descriptive and explanatory academic texts. By María Fernanda Jaime. This text will introduce the main topics of the unit which are description and explanation. It will highlight the importance of these two types of texts in academic writing, its concepts and characteristics, which are going to be further developed in the section Communication, genres.
Skills
• Identify the purpose and scope of the unit. Activities
• Students will activate their previous knowledge on the topic, and will set goals by using the first two columns of a K-W-L-H Chart. (Student’s Prior Knowledge, What Students Want to Find Out, What Students Learned, and How Students Learned.)
K W L H
Students´ prior
knowledge
What students want to
find out
What
students
learned
How students
learned
• Students will be introduced to the main topics of the unit: describing and explaining. The cover text will make reference to the importance of these two types of writings. Objectives and strategic contents to be treated along the unit will be also introduced.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
101
Language in context Learn to learn (Strategic contents)
Objective:
• To acquaint students with their own learning strategies when reading, and assist them to broaden and diversify their possible study methods.
Content
• Questionnaire: This is a group interview guide in which they identify their own and other’s reading and writing strategies by answering questions like: What do you do to get ready for reading/writing?, What do you do to make sure you are reading/writing correctly?, etc.
Skills
• Cooperate: Work with others to complete tasks, build confidence, and give and receive feedback.
Activities
• Students will identify and evaluate the efficacy of their reading and writing strategies by answering to the questionnaire at the forum.
• Students will read their partners answers, and suggest ways to improve and enhance their study methods possibilities.
• The teacher will give feedback to students at the forum.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
102
Education Knowledge
Objective:
• To develop reading strategies (reviewing and skimming) to critical understanding a text.
Content:
• Descriptive Text: ‘Coach Students to use strategies when given frequent cues and feedback’.
Source: The Learning Strategies Handbook by Chamot et al. (1999, p.102) This is a four-paragraph descriptive text in which the author suggests teachers a variety of techniques to make students aware of their own learning strategies. They will review concepts like feedback, and learning strategy. Skills
• Reviewing and Skimming
• Reading comprehension Activities
• Students will read ‘Coach Students to use strategies when given frequent cues and feedback’.
• Students will use reviewing and skimming to answer some comprehension questions on the text.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
103
Grammar
Objective:
• Examine texts globally and on sentence level using what students have learned throughout the course.
• Introduce the concepts of register, nominalization, referencing, and modality. Content • Descriptive and Explanatory Texts: Students will be introduced to the topics Register, nominalization, referencing, and modality to write academic texts appropriately. Skills • Academic language accuracy
Text analysis
Cooperative work Activities
• Students will read the content texts and develop series of exercises for each one of the concepts introduced. Exercises will include gap-filling, identifying the use of grammar in context, and correcting texts.
• Students will be given texts from their classmates and they will correct grammar mistakes, taking into account the content learned in units 4, and the concepts of register, nominalization, referencing, and modality.
• Students will write a feedback to their partners. They will describe and explain how these problems affect motivation and academic language learning, and what learning strategies can help students to overcome those issues.
• Texts must be sent to the tutor via e-mail for correction and feedback. Optionally, students can work through Google Docs tool.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
104
Genres
Objective:
• Introduce the concepts of describing and explaining.
• Recognize and use descriptive and explanatory basic strategies to write short paragraphs.
Content Students will read about the basic strategies to write short paragraphs in academic texts like descriptions and explanations. The students will be introduced and explained the next basic strategies for descriptions and explanations:
Naming, Detailing, and Comparing.
Defining, Classifying, Contrasting, Reporting causes and effects, and Process narrating.
Skills
Reading comprehension
Text analysis
Academic Writing
Cooperative work
Activities
• Students will read the content texts. They will be introduced the main topics of the unit: Describing and Explaining.
• By reading different descriptive and explanatory texts on learning strategies, students will be lead through the analysis of the mentioned basic strategies to explanatory and descriptive writing in context.
• Students will use the basic strategies to write a description and explanation on given topics on learning strategies.
• Texts must be sent to the tutor via e-mail for correction and feedback.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
105
Knowledge Bank Grammar
Objective
• Enhance knowledge on academic grammar Content
• Precise verbs to introduce sources and authors.
• Adjective clauses
• Discourse markers. Skills
• Academic language accuracy
• Web search Activities
• If required, students will search on the web for content related to precise verbs to introduce sources and authors, Adjective clauses, and Discourse markers. Bibliography and websites will be given by the tutor.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
106
Genres
Objective • Enhance knowledge on descriptive and explanatory essays. Content • Academic essay writing Essay concept Types of academic essays Descriptive and argumentative essays Skills • Academic language accuracy • Web search Activities • If required, students will search on the web for content related academic essay writing on http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/01
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
107
Check your knowledge
Learn to learn (Strategic contents) / Aprender a aprender
Objetive
• Assess education knowledge, grammar, and genre conceptual knowledge. Content
• Given K-W-L-H Chart.
Skills
• Think critically about what they have learned. Activities
• Students will complete the 2 columns of the given K-W-L-H Chart given at the beginning of the unit. In the L chart students will write a short explanation of the main concepts they learned on learning strategies, register, nominalization, referencing, and modality, and descriptions and explanations as academic texts.
• In the H chart students will write a short description of how they learned the main contents of the unit, including the learning strategies they came across during the learning process.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
108
Communication Genres
Objective Write an essay on a given topic related to ‘learning strategies’. Content:
For describing: Naming, Detailing, and Comparing.
For explaining: Defining, Classifying, Contrasting, Reporting causes and effects, and Process narrating.
Skills:
Describing and explaining
Organize, Structure ideas, and transfer knowledge
Language accuracy, appropriacy and cohesion
Cooperate with partners Activities
• Essay writing. Students will choose a topic from a list given by the tutor and write a two-page essay. The text must include descriptive and explanatory paragraphs in which students will make use of the academic grammar and precise vocabulary learnt during the unit. The document must be sent to the tutor in order to assess the product and provide feedback.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
109
Additional readings Learn to learn (Strategic contents)
Objective
Enhance and consolidate knowledge on strategic contents. Content:
Readings: Brain-Based Learning Strategies: Get Students’ Attention With a Radish Second language acquisition - essential information Skills:
Autonomous learning.
Follow instructions.
Anticipating.
Mapping ideas. Activities
Students will be presented three additional readings. The first one will be simple instructions to be followed in which students will show understanding low-level complexity texts. The second one will be an extract of a reading in which students will anticipate the content based on the introductory paragraphs of the article. In this activity students will show average –level complexity text understanding. In the last reading, students will have to summarize the text by using mapping as a reading strategy for high – level complexity texts understanding.
Autonomous work will be expected once they have completed the unit activities. Additional readings will help students consolidate and enhance their knowledge on the strategic contents of the unit.
education knowledge: http://www.teachhub.com/brain-based-learning-strategies-get-students-attention-radish
academic grammar: http://esl.fis.edu/teachers/support/cummin.htm
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
110
Functions
Reading for activating TEFL knowledge and practicing key reading strategies on reading comprehension.
Additional excercices
Learn to learn
Objective
Enhance and consolidate knowledge on Academic Grammar Content: Exercises on: Quotations, Precise vocabulary, and Consistency
Skills:
Autonomous learning. Activities:
Students will develop four different self-assessment tasks with different complexity levels (low, average, high).
In the first two exercises students will punctuate quotations and choose the correct sentence from a three-choice pattern.
In the second exercise, students will organize the contrastive essay outline according to the linking devices found at the beginning of each sentence.
In the third exercise, students will decide whether the highlighted words in an argumentative essay are correct or not. They will also propose a correct answer if they find mistakes.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
111
Se
qu
en
ce &
tim
ing
Day 1: (Friday) Cover Reading and activities. 1 hour. Day 2: Language in context activities (learning to learn). 1 hour. Day 3: Language in context activities (education knowledge). 1 hour. Day 4: Language in context activities (grammar). 1 hour. Day 5: Language in context activities (genre). 1 hour. Day 6: Knowledge Bank. (Grammar and Genre). 1 hour. Day 7: Communication: Genre. 2 hours.
Tea
ch
er’
s b
oo
k
Previous observations
Tutors ought to take into account that the aims of this unit are related to expose students to contents and tasks related to master academic grammar, describe a case/situation in an understandable and organized way, and explain a case/situation in an understandable and organized way. Therefore, the activities proposed for an online environment and the platform Moodle have a tendency to promote collaborative and autonomous learning. Among the proposed activities there are different pedagogical readings to introduce the learners in the topics of learning strategies, descriptions and explanations. Advanced academic grammar is also introduced through different individual and cooperative tasks which might help the students overcome those problems detected during the analysis of actual TEFL students’ written assignments. Tutors may also find some students who find it difficult to catch up with others due to the variety of learning styles and learning paces. This is the main reason for the creation and design of some extra activities and exercises. The tutor can use them wisely to help students to succeed in their academic assignments and stimulate autonomous learning.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
112
Before starting
Unit 9 deals with providing students opportunities to develop their writing skills when writing descriptions and explanation using academic grammar. The time provided is 10 hours to be distributed in a week. Several tools are also provided for the students to complete the activities. The principal mean of communication will be the forum on which tutors will publish clear instructions to guide students in the process of achieving the goals of the unit. In this section of the teacher’s book, the tutor will find the instructions to be published on the forum from Friday to Thursday, as well as the instructions to complete the tasks and the self-evaluated tasks, and the guidelines for students to search information on the net. Students’ participation is expected. Tutor’s feedback is also crucial to maintain students’ motivation high.
Assessment
Assessment will be carried out in different ways. One of the objectives of this unit is to assess education, grammar and genre conceptual knowledge. Many of the activities in unit 9 encourage collaborative learning, thus individual and pair work is expected. Summative assessment will be also practiced since this unit embraces knowledge they have acquired through the unit contents and over previous units. Co-assessment will also permit students to help each other through tools such Google docs and the forum. Formative assessment and self-assessment will be also implemented to check students’ learning and detect possible problems and their causes.
Additional tasks
Additional readings and exercises will be used wisely by the teacher to help those students who might have problems when understanding or performing any of the unit contents. Low-track students may find it necessary to go further and read more material or do more exercises on the topic they are learning. All the same, these activities will be helpful for those students who are used to go further and like to find more information on what they are learning. Tutors should encourage students to use this material (if necessary).
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
113
Appendix VI: Contents Unit 10
Week 10: 7 days, 10 hours
Subject: Writing: Academic Writing
Unit: Argumentation, and Academic Vocabulary
Ob
jeti
ves
Argue consistently. Convince the reader.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
114
Co
nte
nts
Cover / Portadilla
Learn to learn (Strategic contents)
Objective: • To understand argumentations as an essential text of the academic discourse. • To activate student’s prior knowledge and experience on the matter and assist them to set their goals for this unit. Content • Text: The argumentative text. Concepts and characteristics. By María Fernanda Jaime. This text will introduce the main topic of the unit which is the argumentation and how to argue a reasoned argument and its importance in the academic life. This topic will be further explained and practiced in the section Communication and Genres. Skills • Identify the purpose and scope of the unit. Activities • Students will activate their previous knowledge on the topic, and will anticipate the unit content by answering a list of 5 questions given by the tutor. • Students will be introduced to the main topic of the unit: Argumentation. The cover text will make reference to the importance of this type of academic text. Objectives and strategic contents to be treated along the unit will be also introduced.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
115
Language in context Learn to learn (Strategic contents)
Objective: • To acquaint students with their own learning strategies when they remember what they have learnt. Content • Reflective Graph. Students will calculate the amount of information they remember from a lesson by drawing a curved line in the graph “How much of a lesson do you remember?” Adapted from Tony Buzan (1995) Use your Head, 4th ed, BBCC Books, London, P. 65. The graph is made of 1 vertical and 1 horizontal line where they draw how much they remember of a lesson (From 0% to 100% in the vertical line) according to the time that has passed after the lesson (from 10 minutes to 1 month in the horizontal line). Skills • Cooperate: Work with others to complete tasks, build confidence, and give and receive feedback. Activities • Students will identify and evaluate the efficacy of their memory when remembering what they have learnt by drawing a curved line on a graph. Under the graph they will explain enumerate the top 5 strategies they use to remember their lessons. The graph and strategies will be uploaded to the forum. • Students will compare their graphs with the ones drawn by their partners, and suggest ways to improve and/ or overcome the problem of forgetting what was learnt. • The teacher will give feedback to students at the forum.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
116
Education Knowledge
Objective: • To evaluate reading comprehension skills and to make a diagram as a study strategy. Content: • Argumentative text ‘Does the Internet Encourage Youth to Steal? Are they Cheaters?’ by Taspcopt, J. (2009). This is a six-paragraph argumentative text in which the author suggests teaching youth about plagiarism and its consequences as a new method to prevent cheating. Skills • Reading comprehension • Making a diagram to organize information Activities • Students will read ‘Does the Internet Encourage Youth to Steal? Are they Cheaters?’ • Students will answer some comprehension questions on the text.
Students will draw a diagram with the thesis and supporting arguments of the text. They will upload their diagrams to a google.doc document to be reviewed by the tutor.
The tutor will provide feedback.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
117
Vocabulary
Objective: • To recognize and use academic vocabulary to write academic texts. Content: • Academic vocabulary Precise verbs Linking words and phrases Skills • Reading comprehension • Vocabulary expansion exercises Activities • Students will read the Academic Word List (AWL) compiled by Averil Coxhead in 1998, which will be provided by the tutor. • Students will do cloze exercises to put into practice the academic vocabulary given.
The teacher will correct the exercises on his/her mail.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
118
Genres
Objective: • To analyze and recognize the structure of an argumentative text. Content: • Academic argumentations: • State a thesis • Cohesive devices • Connectives • Headings and subheadings Skills • Reading comprehension • Vocabulary expansion exercises Activities • Students will read selected sections from the Chapter 6 “Arguing a position” on the book St. Martin’s guide to writing. (p. 265-293). • Students will do exercises to recognize theses, cohesive devises and connectives in the argumentative text given in chapter 6. • Students will answer to reflective questions which will lead them to reflect upon the main characteristics of an argumentative text. The answers will be sent to the teacher by e-mail.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
119
Knowledge Bank Vocabulary
Objective • Enhance knowledge on academic vocabulary Content • Precise verbs • Discourse markers. Skills • Academic language accuracy • Web search Activities • If required, students will search on the web for content related to academic precise verbsand discourse markers. Bibliography and websites will be given by the tutor.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
120
Genres
Objective • Enhance knowledge on argumentative essays. Content • Academic essay writing Essay concept Types of academic essays Argumentative essays Developing argumentative essays Developing strong thesis statements Skills • Academic language accuracy • Web search Activities • If required, students will search on the web for content related academic essay writing on http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/01, http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05/ http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/1/
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
121
Check your knowledge
Learn to learn (Strategic contents)
Objective • Assess education knowledge, academic vocabulary, and genre conceptual knowledge. Content • Now I know checklist. Skills • Think critically about what they have learned. Activities • Students will complete a ‘Now I know’ checklist. They will mark a check if they know, X if they do not know, and will give a further explanation on how they learned the main contents of the unit, including the learning strategies they came across during the learning process. The checklist will be sent to the tutor by e-mail.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
122
Communication Genres
Objective Write an essay on a given topic related to ‘CALL’. Content: • For arguing a position: Stating a thesis, developing an argument, counterargument, concluding. Skills: • Arguing a position giving valid supporting reasons
Convincing the reader • Organize, Structure ideas, and transfer knowledge • Language accuracy, appropriacy and cohesion • Cooperate with partners Activities • Essay writing. Students will choose a topic from a list given by the tutor and write a two-page essay. The text must include argumentative paragraphs with valid supporting reasons to convince the reader. Students will make use of the academic grammar and precise vocabulary learnt in units 9 and 10. The document must be sent to the tutor in order to assess the product and provide feedback.
Students can choose to share their essay with a partner in order to make peer correction before sending the paper to the tutor (Optional).
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
123
Additional readings
Learn to learn (Strategic contents)
Objective
Enhance and consolidate knowledge on strategic contents. Content:
Readings: Online Courses CALL use in EFL/ESL Classroom The Effect of Using Computer-Assisted Language Learning Skills:
Autonomous learning. Activities Students will be presented three additional readings. The level of complexity increases per reading. Students will have to answer comprehension, anticipation, and inference questions for the first two texts. The third text is an argumentative essay from which they will have to identify the main thesis and its three supportive arguments. Autonomous work will be expected once they have completed the unit activities. Additional readings will help students consolidate and enhance their knowledge on the strategic contents of the unit.
Functions
Reading for activating TEFL knowledge
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
124
Additional excercices
Learn to learn
Objective
Enhance and consolidate knowledge on Academic Vocabulary Content: Exercises on: Precise vocabulary
Skills:
Autonomous learning. Activities:
Students will develop four self-assessment exercises. The first one is a low-
level complexity academic vocabulary exercise in which they will have to match
a word with its definition.
The second is also a low-level complexity vocabulary exercise in which
students will have to check if some pairs of words have or not similar meaning.
The third exercise is an average-level complexity exercise in which students will
complete a sentence with one option from the multiple choice answer.
The fourth and last exercise is a high –level complexity one in which students
will have to complete an essay with academic words from a chart. The last text
was retrieved from: http://www.dcielts.com/AWL/essays/school-curriculum.htm
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
125
Se
qu
en
ce
& t
imin
g
Day 1: (Friday) Cover Reading and activities. 1 hour. Day 2: Language in context activities (learning to learn). 1 hour. Day 3: Language in context activities (education knowledge). 1 hour. Day 4: Language in context activities (vocabulary). 1 hour. Day 5: Language in context activities (genre). 1 hour. Day 6: Knowledge Bank. (Vocabulary and Genre). 1 hour. Day 7: Communication: Genre. 2 hours.
Tea
ch
er’
s b
oo
k
Previous observations
Tutors ought to take into account that the aims of this unit are related to expose students to contents and tasks related to master academic vocabulary and argue a case/situation in an understandable and organized way. Therefore, the activities proposed for an online environment and the platform Moodle have a tendency to promote collaborative and autonomous learning. Among the proposed activities there are different pedagogical readings to introduce the learners in the topics of CALL, and arguments. Advanced academic vocabulary is also introduced through different individual and cooperative tasks which might help the students overcome those problems detected during the analysis of actual TEFL students’ written assignments. Tutors may also find some students who find it difficult to catch up with others due to the variety of learning styles and learning paces. This is the main reason for the creation and design of some extra activities and exercises. The tutor can use them wisely to help students to succeed in their academic assignments and stimulate autonomous learning.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
126
Before starting
Unit 10 deals with providing students opportunities to develop their writing skills when writing arguments using academic vocabulary. The time provided is 10 hours to be distributed in a week. Several tools are also provided for the students to complete the activities. The principal mean of communication will be the forum on which tutors will publish clear instructions to guide students in the process of achieving the goals of the unit. In this section of the teacher’s book, the tutor will find the instructions to be published on the forum from Friday to Thursday, as well as the instructions to complete the tasks and the self-evaluated tasks, and the guidelines for students to search information on the net. Students’ participation is expected. Tutor’s feedback is also crucial to maintain students’ motivation high.
Assessment
Assessment will be carried out in different ways. One of the objectives of this unit is to assess education, grammar and genre conceptual knowledge. Many of the activities in unit 9 encourage collaborative learning, thus individual and pair work is expected. Summative assessment will be also practiced since this unit embraces knowledge they have acquired through the unit contents and over previous units. Co-assessment will also permit students to help each other through tools such the forum. Formative assessment and self-assessment will be also implemented to check students’ learning and detect possible problems and their causes.
Additional tasks
Additional readings and exercises will be used wisely by the teacher to help those students who might have problems when understanding or performing any of the unit contents. Low-track students may find it necessary to go further and read more material or do more exercises on the topic they are learning. All the same, these activities will be helpful for those students who are used to go further and like to find more information on what they are learning. Tutors should encourage students to use this material (if necessary).
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
127
Appendix VII: Student’s book unit 9
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
128
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
129
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
130
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
131
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
132
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
133
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
134
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
135
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
136
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
137
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
138
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
139
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
140
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
141
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
142
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
143
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
144
Appendix VIII: Student’s book unit 10
Unit 10 Argumentation and Academic Vocabulary
“What is written without effort is read without pleasure.” Samuel Johnson
In this Unit you will learn how to:
• Master Academic Vocabulary
• Argument a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
The main contents to be covered are:
• Characteristics of Academic Argumentations
• Steps to write Academic Argumentations
• Develop your ideas further and deeper to show critical thinking
• Basic knowledge about CALL
The main objectives for each section are:
• To understand argumentations as an essential text of the academic
discourse.
• To activate student’s prior knowledge and experience on the matter and
assist them to set their goals for this unit.
• To acquaint students with their own learning strategies when they
remember what they have learnt.
• To evaluate reading comprehension skills and to make a diagram as a study
strategy.
• To recognize and use academic vocabulary to write academic texts.
• To analyze and recognize the structure of an argumentative text.
• To enhance knowledge on academic vocabulary
• To enhance knowledge on argumentative essays.
• To assess education knowledge, academic vocabulary, and genre
conceptual knowledge.
• To write an essay on a given topic related to ‘CALL’.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
145
1. Cover
1.1 Activate your knowledge! (Self-Assessment Activity)
1. Read the title of the text. What do you think the text is about?
2. What kind of academic texts do you know?
3. Why do you think academic texts are important?
4. What is an argument?
5. Have you ever written an argument? If so, what were the main characteristics
of your argument?
1.2 The Argumentative Text
Arguing a position is considered an academic text which objective is to convince the
reader to accept or reject a particular position on a controversial issue by giving
plausible reasons supported by reasoned arguments. According to Axelrod and Cooper
(2004), in order to be a convincing text, it also has to anticipate reader’s likely
objections and opposing arguments. Moreover, The Purdue Writing Lab (2012) affirms
that these types of papers “generally call for extensive research”. Thus, it “allows the
student to learn about a topic…., choose a position and support it with the evidence
collected during research”. An argumentative essay can also include descriptions and
explanations, so you will need to take into account unit 9 contents in order to support
an argument.
An argumentative text is considered crucial to the academic life not only because it is
usually required, but because according to the Student Learning Centre from the
Flinders University of Australia (2006), an argument can be used to:
• Support something we think has merit – a position, a point of view, a program, an
object.
• Persuade someone that something would be beneficial to do (or not to do) – a
particular course of action.
• Convince someone that something is true, likely to be true or probable – a fact, an
outcome.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
146
• Show someone the problems or difficulties with something – a theory, an approach, a
course of action.
• Reason with someone to get them to change their mind or their practice.
On the other hand, as it has been exposed in previous units of this course, academic
grammar and academic vocabulary are key aspects to be covered in academic writing.
Academic vocabulary, for instance, is related to the appropriate connectives, indicator
words or discourse markers used in academic writing. By using the correct vocabulary
in your arguments, you will be able to achieve your purpose: convince the reader to
accept or reject a particular position.
2. Language in context
2.1 Learn to learn (Forum activity)
Reflective Graph: Adapted from Tony Buzan (1995) Use your Head, 4th ed, BBCC
Books, London, P. 65. The graph is made of 1 vertical and 1 horizontal line where you
draw how much you remember of a lesson (From 0% to 100% in the vertical line)
according to the time that has passed after the lesson (from 10 minutes to 1 month in
the horizontal line).
2.1.1 Identify and evaluate the efficacy of your memory when remembering what you
have learnt by drawing a curved line on the graph “How much of a lesson do you
remember?”
2.1.2 Under the graph explain enumerate the top 5 strategies you use to remember
your lessons.
2.1.3 Compare your graph with the ones drawn by your partners, and suggest ways to
improve and/or overcome the problem of forgetting what was learnt.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
147
2.2 Computer Language Learning: Internet influence on
learners.
2.2.1 The use of the internet for academic purposes has given students broad
opportunities to obtain information. The next article suggests teaching youth about
plagiarism and its consequences as a new method to prevent cheating. Read the
article.
Does the Internet encourage Youth to Steal?
Are they Cheaters?
Our research shows that the Net Generation are big believers in integrity –
honesty, consideration, accountability, and transparency. Yet, according to nGenera
research, 77 percent of Net Geners have downloaded music, software, games, or
movies without paying for it. It sounds like a contradiction until you start talking to
them. They don’t see it as stealing and their assessment of the situation is pretty
sophisticated. They think this is a case of a business model that needs to be changed.
Net Geners, they say, pay more for music than ever – but not the old-fashioned way.
They buy some music online and they spend a big chunk of their disposable income on
concerts, ringtones, and artists’ products.
This old model of owning and selling music makes no sense for this entire
generation, or for anyone else for that matter. I don´t think it is stealing. It is a classic
example of a disruptive technology. For a decade I have described a model that would
work. Music should be a service, not a product. Instead of purchasing tunes, you
should pay a small monthly fee for access to all the songs in the world. They could be
streamed to you when you want and where you want via the Internet. I call my vision
of music bliss Everywhere Internet Audio. I’d listen to my own Don Channel. I could
slice and dice the massive musical database anyway I liked –by artist, by genre, by
year, by songwriter, by popularity, and so on. The Don Channel would know what I
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
148
like, based on what I’ve chosen in the past. I could even ask my Everywhere Audio
service to suggest new artists that resemble my known favorites.
If Everywhere Internet Audio existed, no one would ever “steal”. Why would they
take possession of a song? Once again young people are showing how we need to
change our business models – if we would only listen to them. Rather than build bold
new approaches for digital entertainment, the industry that brought us the Beatles is
now hated by its customers and collapsing. Sadly, obsession with control, piracy, and
proprietary standards on the part of large industry players has only served to further
alienate and anger music listeners.
What about intellectual property in the corporate world? Should employers be
worried that the Net Geners will blog it to the world? This is not a complicated
problem. Simply tell Net Geners what’s confidential, and set rules about cated
problem. As for revealing corporate secrets, experience shows that they have good
judgment. When Jonathan Schwartz became CEO of Sun Microsystems, he gave every
employee the right to blog publically. They have never had a problem releasing
inappropriate information.
It’s a big issue in the university too. The Internet makes it easy to plagiarize, and,
according to one 2003 survey, 38 percent of college and university students cut and
paste information they find on the Internet. Plagiarism appears to have gone up by
eight percentage points since the early 1960s. But Don McCabe, a Rutgers Business
School professor and expert on plagiarism, sees no widespread increase in plagiarism
on campus. Rather, the students who are plagiarizing are using the Internet to do it
more. It’s not clear whether cheating overall has increased, either. Sixty percent of
high school students admitted to cheating on an exam “at least once” on a 2006
survey conducted by the Josephson Institute –virtually the same number who admitted
to cheating in 1992.
Whether or not it is gone up, cheating is clearly a problem. The Internet cuts the
cost of stealing or buying someone else’s work and young people are under enormous
pressure to score good grades so that they’ll get into universities of their choice. So
what’s the answer? UCLA and other U.S. universities, as well as several others in
Canada and elsewhere, are using an online program called Turnitin.com to detect
plagiarism. The company claims it can cut “measurable rates” of plagiarism to “almost
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
149
zero.” My own kids say that online programs like this are an effective deterrent –
because then most students wouldn’t even think about trying to plagiarize when the
penalty could be a failure or even a suspension. Yet the Center for Academic Integrity,
a coalition of hundreds of educational institutions, does not think that technology can
solve the problem completely. “Instead, we should be encouraging respect and fairness
among the students,” says the center’s director, Dr. Stephen Satris.
Source: Tapscott, J. (2009, p. 69).
2.2.2 Answer the following questions about the text.
1. What controversial issue is being argued in the text?
_______________________________________________________________
2. The title of the article posts two questions. The answer to these questions is the
main thesis of the text. Can you identify the answer?
_______________________________________________________________
3. Along the text there are three supportive reasons to the main thesis. Identify
them and list them.
a. _____________________________________________________________
b. _____________________________________________________________
c. _____________________________________________________________
4. After reading the text. Do you think the Internet encourage Youth to Steal? Do
you think they are Cheaters? Write your answer using your own words.
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
2.2.3 Draw a diagram with the thesis and supporting arguments of the text. Upload
your diagrams to a google.doc document and share it with your tutor. (Send it to your
tutor’s mail).
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
150
2.3 Vocabulary
2.3.1 Think about it! (Self-Assessment Activity)
In what ways do you think academic vocabulary will contribute to your
successful studies at university?
What techniques do you already use to learn academic vocabulary?
Academic vocabulary refers to the words associated with the content knowledge.
Antonacci & O’Callaghan (2011, p.11) state that “Within every discipline there is a
specific set of words to represent its concepts and processes. These words are
conceptually more complex than everyday language; therefore, they are more difficult
to learn.” Students who intent academic success, require the ability to write and
expose their ideas precisely, avoiding repetition.
2.3.2 Study the next examples and the words given in the box. Which one best
express what the author means?
The author thinks that Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is…
The article says that computer use in the English classroom is a positive…
Skinner (2008) shows that there are three steps to follow…
Argues
believes
claims
clarifies
declares
defends
emphasizes
insists
illustrates
implies
indicates
observes
Rejects
proposes
suggest
supports
2.3.3 Precise verbs
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
151
Study the next table by Khoo (2005), and practice the use of precise verbs to
introduce authors and sources.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
152
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
153
2.3.3.1 Practice time! (Self-Assessment Activity)
Complete the next text by Zohrabi (2010), using precise verbs from the table above.
Nunan (1999, p. 98) ___________ that coursebook is the main element of any
curriculum and “it is difficult to imagine a class without books …” In this regard,
Robinson (1991, p. 57) ________ that coursebooks provide “a framework for a course,
forming in essence a syllabus.” Meanwhile, she __________ that using a coursebook
has positive psychological effects on the students because coursebooks provide the
whole semester’s course to them. At this juncture, Hedge (2002, p. 358) __________
that when we choose a coursebook, we, in fact, choose a “planned sequence of items
to be taught.” In this regards, Dudley-Evans and St John (2000, p. 170) _________
four main reasons for using materials in the classroom: “as a source of language, as a
learning support, for motivation and stimulation, and for reference.” Cunningsworth
(1995, p. 7) ___________ that coursebooks have multiple roles in English language
classes and can help to present the written and spoken material, provide activities,
promote interaction, serve as a reference on vocabulary and grammar, act as a source
for classroom activities, serve as a syllabus, and offer self-access work or self-directed
learning. Richards and Rodgers (2002, p. 30) ___________that the main aim of
materials is to present and practice content, ease interaction between students, and
promote learner autonomy. However, as Hutchinson and Waters (1989) _______, the
primary role of materials is to facilitate the learning process because useful materials
do not teach rather they encourage learning. Hedge (2002, p. 36) ___________ that
good materials allow the learners to prepare in advance by offering a grammatical and
functional framework that provide for their common needs and wants… Finally, Harmer
(2002, p. 304) __________ that coursebooks foster students’ perception of progress,
provide materials for revision, and engage them in multiple ways.
2.3.4 Discourse markers The use of connectives, indicator words or discourse markers is crucial to show
cohesive device in your writing. By using them, you will show the logical connection
between your ideas, paragraphs and in a general sense, your text. When using them,
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
154
it will indicate the reason why you include a particular piece of information and its
relevance to your thesis.
Some useful discourse markers are the ones listed by the Student Learning Centre of
the Flinders University (2010, p. 4):
Citing evidence:
According to Smith, . . . Smith claims that . . . Smith states . . .
This is supported by . . . Research findings indicate/show that . . .
This indicates that . . . There is evidence to show that . . .
As Smith claims/shows/illustrates, . . .
Showing agreement Showing disagreement
Consequently, . . . In contrast, . . .
At the same time, . . . On the contrary, . . .
As indicated, . . . On the other hand, . . .
Further to . . . However, . . .
In support, . . . Contrary to . . .
As a consequence, . .., but . . .
Furthermore, . . .
Disjunction (qualifying)
Despite this, . . . Although . . .
In spite of this, . . . While . . .
Nevertheless, . . . Whereas . . .
Regardless of . . . Yet . . .
Even if, even though . . . By comparison, . . .
Other language for addressing the literature
It is clear that . . .
As shown, current research . . .
In relation to X, this is very important/ significant because . . .
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
155
As can be seen, many theorists hold that . . .
There are serious implications that can be drawn from . . .
These findings indicate that . . .
This finding is supported by . . .
This seems to imply that . . .
It is still not completely clear that . . .
Interesting research has been conducted by. . .
They extend the idea of . . .
Evidence of this can be seen in the work by . . .
2.4 Genres
Academic argumentations
Although people may think that an argument is quarreling or debating with others
about something, as it its usually presented in TV shows or radio programs, in the
academic world an argument do not necessarily lead to discrepancy. Academically,
arguing a position means to critically look at other’s and my own point of view on a
controversial issue. Axelrod and Cooper (2004) state that “Although it is not possible
to prove that a position on a controversial issue is right or wrong, it is possible through
reasoned argument to convince others to accept or reject a particular position”.
Source: The student Learning Centre, Flinders University
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
156
2.4.1 Understanding the argumentative writing sequence in a
collaborative way (Wiki Activity)
Step 1. Work with two or three other partners. Choose one of the issues in the list, you
do not need to be an expert on the topic, but you have to be familiar with the
arguments people usually make about it:
Should all teachers be required to use computers in the language classroom?
Should all students know about how to avoid plagiarism when they copy
information from the internet?
Should all institutions have an English laboratory for language practice?
Should computers replace teachers?
Step 2. Take two or three minutes to exchange your opinions and agree together to
argue for the same position. Who do you think is going to be the audience of your
paper? Record your results in this way:
Issue: Should computers replace teachers?
Position: Computers should not replace teachers.
Readers: Academic community (teachers, students, parents, institutions, etc.)
Step 3. In about 15 minutes, construct an argument for your position giving reasons
with supporting arguments. Anticipate likely objections from reader who might
disagree with your position. Then, write down your findings under the following
headings:
Reasons:
1. Teachers have different roles in the classroom, not only they are language
instructors, but they are also facilitators, planners, co-communicators,
counselors, and guides as well.
2. Computers could only show contents and permit practice, but do not
complement the language learning process the way teachers do.
Support needed:
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
157
1. Teachers’ roles.
2. Students’ opinion and experience with the issue.
3. Teachers’ and experts experience and knowledge about the topic.
Likely objections:
1. Buying computer programmes would be cheaper than paying teachers.
2. Computers follow a course plan systematically, making students cope with the
course objectives.
Step 4. For about 5 minutes discuss what you did to construct an argument:
Reasons: What did you learn about giving reasons? How did you choose the most
relevant ones? Was it difficult for you think about reasons, how did you solve the
problem?
Support: What did you learn about supporting an argument? What kind of support did
you take into account (quotations, examples, anecdotes, experience)? Which reasons
were easier or harder to support?
Objections: What did you learn about anticipation objections to your argument? How
did you come up with them? Was it difficult to consider your readers’ objections?
2.4.2 Basic features for arguing a position
Read the next selected paragraphs by Axelrod and Cooper (2004, p.294-295), which
best summarize the basic features for arguing a position:
A Focused Presentation of the Issue
Writers use a variety of strategies to present the issue and prepare readers for their
argument. For current, hotly debated issues, the title may be enough to identify the
issue (allusions to stories, chants, poems; brief histories; examples; detailing, among
others). Many writers provide concrete examples early on to make sure that readers
can understand the issue.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
158
How writers present the issue depends on what they assume readers already know and
what they want readers to think about the issue. Therefore, they try to define the issue
in a way that promotes their position.
A Clear Position
Very often writers declare their position in a thesis statement early in the essay (first
or second paragraph). This strategy has the advantage of letting readers know right
away where the writer stands. In composing a thesis statement, writers try to make
their position unambiguous, appropriately qualified, and clearly arguable (avoiding
common words like ‘wrong’).
Plausible Reasons and Convincing Report
To argue for a position, writers must give reasons. Even in relatively brief essays,
writers sometimes give more than one reason and state their reasons explicitly.
Writers know they cannot simply assert their reasons. They must support them with
examples, statistics, authorities, or anecdotes.
Anticipating Opposing Positions and Objections
Writers also try to anticipate other widely held positions on the issue as well as
objections and questions readers might raise to an argument. Writers counterargue by
both accommodating or refuting opposing positions and objections. Anticipating
readers’ positions and objections can enhance the writer’s credibility and strengthen
the argument. When readers holding an opposing position recognize that the writer
takes their position seriously, they are more likely to listen to what the writer has to
say. It can also reassure readers that they share certain important values and
attitudes with the writer, building a bridge of common concerns among people who
have been separated by difference and antagonism.
2.4.2.1 Let’s remember!
Taking into account what you have read about academic argumentations, use your
own words to list the main steps to create an argument. Explain them.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
159
3. Knowledge Bank
3.1 Vocabulary
Don’t forget!
Academic vocabulary refers to the words associated with the content knowledge. To
write appropriate academic argumentations it is necessary to use precise verbs to
introduce authors and authors, and discourse markers.
Precise verbs include:
Accounts for
Argues
Asserts
Analyze
Assumes
Assesses
Claims
Clarifies
Compares
Concludes
Contrasts
Criticizes
Conveys
Defends
Defines
Demonstrates
Describes
Depicts
Determines
Distinguishes
Evaluates
Emphasizes
Examines
Exemplifies
Exhibits
Explains
Frames
Identifies
Illustrates
Implies
Indicates
Investigates
Judges
Justifies
Maintain
Narrates
Proposes
Questions
Recognizes
Reflects
Refers to
Reports
Relies on
Reviews
Suggests
Stresses
Supports
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
160
Discourse markers include:
Type of discourse marker Example
Addition Additionally, furthermore, in addition,
moreover
Cause / reason As a result of, because of
Comparison Compared with, in the same way, in
comparison with, likewise
Condition If, unless, whether… or not
Contrast Although, despite, however, by contrast,
nevertheless, yet, conversely, on the
contrary, on the other hand
Effect /result As a result, hence, therefore, thus
Exemplification For example, for instance, particularly,
such as, thus
Reformulation In other words, rather, to paraphrase
Summary Finally, hence, in all, in conclusion, in
short, in summary
Time sequence After, at first, at last, before, first,
second, subsequently, eventually
Transition As far as… is concerned, to turn to, as
for
To search for more information on cohesive devices for your academic texts search
on
http://yourieltstutor.com/cohesive-devices-transitional-wordsphrases-for-essay-
writing/
http://yourieltstutor.com/cohesive-devices-transitional-wordsphrases-for-essay-
writing/
3.2 Genres
The next chart summarizes the main characteristics of a good argument.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
161
Source: The student Learning Centre, Flinders University
For more information on academic essay writing search on
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/01,
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05/
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/1/
4. Check your knowledge 4.1 Learn to learn (Self-Assessment Activity) 4.1.1 Complete the next checklist to remember the contents in this unit and what
learning strategies you used to do it. How much do you remember?
Now I know Yes No How I
learned it
Need further
study
What an academic argumentation is
The characteristics of academic
argumentations
The steps to construct academic
argumentation
Why academic writing is important to
academic success
Precise verbs to introduce authors and
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
162
sources
Discourse markers
To write an academic argument using
precise verbs to introduce authors and
sources, and discourse markers as
cohesive devices
5. Communication
5.1 Genres Final Task
5.1.1 Essay writing. Choose a topic from the list and write a 250-word essay. The
text must include the steps for arguing a position (Stating a thesis, developing an
argument, counterargument, concluding). The use of academic grammar and
academic vocabulary should be reflected as well. The document must be sent
through the icon “Final Assignment (Task)” in order to assess the product and
provide feedback. This assignment has to fulfil the following conditions:
Length: 250 words
Type of font: Arial or Times New Roman.
Size: 11.
Line height: 1.5.
Alignment: Justified.
6. References
Aexlrod R. B. & Cooper C. R. (2004). The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing. Short
Seventh Edition. Bedford/St Martin’s
Antonacci P. A. & O’Callaghan C.M. (2011). Developing Content Area Literacy. Sage
Publications. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-
data/34121_Section1.pdf
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
163
Khoo, E. (2005). Verbs in Academic Writing. The Writing Centre, University of
Toronto at Scarborough. Retrieved from
http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~tlsweb/TWC/webresources/terms.htm
Taspcot, J. (2009). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation, McGraw-Hill
Writing an Argument. (2006). The Study Skills Brochure. The Flinders University of
South Australia. CRICOS Provider Number 00114A. Retrieved from
http://www.flinders.edu.au/slc_files/Documents/Brochures/writg_argument.
Zohrabi, M. (2010). Coursebook Development and Evaluation for English for
General Purposes Course. Published by Canadian Center of Science and
Education www.ccsenet.org/elt English Language Teaching Vol. 4, No. 2;
June 2011. The University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
164
Appendix IX: Teacher’s book unit 9
TEACHER’S BOOK UNIT 9
Description, Explanation and Academic
Grammar
1. Previous observations
In this Unit Students will learn how to:
• Master Academic Grammar
• Describe a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
• Explain a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
The main contents to be covered are:
• Characteristics of Academic descriptions and explanations
• Steps to write Academic descriptions and explanations
• Develop students’ ideas further and deeper to show critical thinking
• Basic knowledge about Learning strategies
The main objectives for each section are:
• To understand descriptions and explanations as staples texts of the
academic discourse.
• To acquaint students with their own learning strategies when reading, and
assist them to broaden and diversify their possible study methods.
• To examine texts globally and on sentence level, using what students have
learned throughout the course.
• To introduce the concepts of register, nominalization, referencing, and
modality.
• To introduce the concepts of describing and explaining, and to recognize and
use descriptive and explanatory basic strategies.
• To enhance knowledge on descriptive and explanatory essays, and academic
grammar.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
165
• To assess education knowledge, grammar, and genre conceptual knowledge.
• To write a short essay on a given topic related to ‘learning strategies’.
2. Before starting
Every activity proposed will be guided and supported by the tutor through
constant interaction with students. The main meaning of communication will be the
Forum. It is there where the tutor will post the instructions every Friday. Instructions
must be clear and concise, since they are the base for a good understanding and
development of the unit.
This is the welcome message for unit 9 (to be posted on Friday on the Forum):
Forum Instructions
Dear students,
Welcome to unit 9. In this paper you will find some important information to
guide you through the contents and academic activities to be covered and
completed during this week. As you all may know, this week will last from 00/00/00
to 00/00/00, and the activities have been scheduled in order for you to do the best
and following the due dates. I am sure you will all participate actively in each one
of them to share your knowledge and experiences in the field. The tutorial dates
indicated above are the days I will be available to answer all your questions via the
VC mail or my personal mail.
Chat sessions are highly recommendable. It is important to organize dates and
time slots and to use this tool as frequently as possible to discuss a variety of
issues such as the self-evaluated tasks, the debate, the assignments, differences of
opinion about academic issues, problems with the platform, the material and so on.
Here is some information you need for this week:
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
166
1. Contents
This week you will get and share knowledge about Academic Writing: Description,
Explanation, and Academic Grammar. The main contents to be covered are:
Characteristics of Academic descriptions and explanations
Steps to write Academic descriptions and explanations
Develop your ideas further and deeper to show critical thinking
Basic knowledge about Learning strategies
2. Additional Readings
Additional readings were carefully chosen to enhance ideas and concepts about
the strategic and educational topics discussed during the week. They are available
through the platform icon “additional readings”.
3. Activities
Activities have been scheduled in order to fulfill the 10 hours of the study week.
However, you can always modify the time to your own schedule without interfering
with the due dates. There are two extra hours to work on extra readings and
exercises:
Day 1: (Friday) Cover Reading and activities. 1 hour.
Day 2: Language in context activities (learning to learn). 1 hour.
Day 3: Language in context activities (education knowledge). 1 hour.
Day 4: Language in context activities (grammar). 1 hour.
Day 5: Language in context activities (genre). 1 hour.
Day 6: Knowledge Bank. (Grammar and Genre). 1 hour.
Day 7: Communication: Genre. 2 hours.
4. Assessment
4.1 Forum
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
167
• Students will identify and evaluate the efficacy of their reading and writing
strategies by answering to the questionnaire at the forum.
• Students will read their partners answers, and suggest ways to improve and
enhance their study methods possibilities.
• The teacher will give feedback to students at the forum.
4.2 Self-evaluated tasks
The self-evaluated tasks are very important as self-assessment tools; please
make sure you do them. However, there is no grade allotted to the self-evaluated
tasks. These include:
• Students will activate their previous knowledge on the topic, and will set
goals by using the first two columns of a K-W-L-H Chart. (Student’s Prior
Knowledge, What Students Want to Find Out)
• Students will read ‘Coach Students to use strategies when given frequent
cues and feedback’. They will use reviewing and skimming to answer some
comprehension questions on the text.
• Students will read the content texts and develop series of exercises for each
one of the concepts introduced. Exercises will include gap-filling, identifying the use
of grammar in context, and correcting texts.
• Students will be given texts from their classmates and they will correct
grammar mistakes, taking into account the content learned in units 4, and the
concepts of register, nominalization, referencing, and modality.
• Students will write a feedback to their partners. They will describe and
explain how these problems affect motivation and academic language learning, and
what learning strategies can help students to overcome those issues. Texts must be
sent to the tutor via e-mail for correction and feedback. Optionally, students can
work through Google Docs tool.
• Students will use the basic strategies to write a description and explanation
on given topics on learning strategies. Texts must be sent to the tutor via e-mail for
correction and feedback.
• Students will complete the 2 columns of the given K-W-L-H Chart given at
the beginning of the unit. In the L chart students will write a short explanation of
the main concepts they learned on learning strategies, register, nominalization,
referencing, and modality, and descriptions and explanations as academic texts. In
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
168
the H chart students will write a short description of how they learned the main
contents of the unit, including the learning strategies they came across during the
learning process.
4.3 Assignment
The assignment due dates are clearly stated. Submitting your assignment on
time will assure that this will not be marked late (due to time differences). The final
date for submission mentioned on the VC assignment file will go beyond the due
date by a few days, please do not get confused because the extra days are for late
submissions and if you choose to submit your assignments after the due date you
would lose a point.
If you do not submit an assignment or if you get a failing grade, you will need to
resubmit the assignment. Finally, it is very important that you submit your
assignments on the Moodle Platform only, paying very close attention to the given
instructions. And please pay attention to the quality, format and quantity factors of
your assignment. The assignment for this week is:
• Essay writing. Students will choose a topic from a list given by the tutor and
write a 250-word essay. The text must include descriptive and explanatory
paragraphs in which students will make use of the academic grammar and precise
vocabulary learnt during the unit. The document must be sent to the tutor in order
to assess the product and provide feedback.
I wish you all the best during this week.
Warm regards,
María Fernanda Jaime Osorio
Weeks 9 and 10 tutor
3. Assessment
The unit assessment will take place all over the time the unit last (10 hours)
and will have different presentations. Active participation by students is expected in
every single activity since they are beneficial for academic language learning.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
169
Previous micro tasks will prepare students to complete the final task, allowing them
to have a better chance to succeed in the course.
Activities
In unit 9 students are asked for participation in two forum activities, two self-
assessment activities and three individual activities to be sent to the tutor’s mail for
feedback. The self-assessment activities are consciousness – raising tasks and the
collaborative and individual activities are focused – communication tasks.
Consciousness – raising tasks will also take place in those activities in which
students will be asked to clarify what they have interpreted about any of those
activities, thus, students will build inner knowledge about the language and how to
become a better user of it.
The forum activities and the creation of a wiki will permit co-assessment, since
through these tools for nature students have to create collaborative content and
post their opinion to build knowledge. Formative assessment will be also carried out
by means of the feedback the tutor will provide students once they have submitted
their assignments. All the same, for the final task, the tutor will carry out a
summative assessment where not only he/she will take into account the units’
acquired practical knowledge, but the practical applicability of the contents from
former units. Finally, when self-assessing themselves, students will deal with the
identification of their strengths and weaknesses, especially with the topic of
Learning Strategies.
The Unit 9 student’s book proposes the next tasks and contents:
1. Cover
1.1 Appreciating descriptive and explanatory academic texts
Have students read this introductory text. Students will reflect upon the times they
have used these genres in their academic life and why is it important to master
writing skills to communicate their ideas effectively.
1.2 Activate you knowledge
Students will activate their previous knowledge by completing the chart to establish
what you already know about Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar,
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
170
and establish their study objectives for this unit. Tutor will provide feedback via
mail. This activity will help the tutor to focus students’ objectives, so they can
precise on what is expected from them for the development of the unit.
2. Language in Context
2.1 Forum Activity
In this activity students will identify and evaluate the efficacy of their reading
strategies. As this a forum activity, they will be provided with the environment to
share their experiences and at the same time, they will have the chance to
feedback other students about how to enhance their study methods. Thus,
collaborative learning will take place being the students the center of their learning
process. The tutor will also provide feedback, generating confidence to students.
This is the introductory message to be hung on the forum:
Dear students,
Welcome to the first forum activity in unit 9. You will notice that this is the first
task in which you and your partner will share your knowledge about the strategies
you daily use to read and learn. This forum activity will last from 00/00/00 to
00/00/00, during this week, this forum chain will be opened to assure your
participation. I am sure you will all participate actively to share your knowledge and
experiences in the field.
This activity will be organized in the following way:
1. I will open a new chain of messages in which you will answer some
questions to identify the reading strategies you have found more effective
when understanding written texts.
2. You will read two of your partners’ publications and will directly post an
answer with your opinion about what their reading strategies. Suggest other
reading strategies to enhance your partner’s learning method.
3. On 00/00/00, I will post my feedback and the forum will be closed.
Please be respectful when writing your opinion and take into account that despite
not being an assignment, academic language use will be expected. Use no more
than 350 words on each post; this will make the activity more enjoyable for all.
This is the new message with the questions:
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
171
Dear students,
Answer these questions using academic language and no more than 350 words.
1. What do you do to get ready for reading?
2. What do you do to make sure you are reading correctly?
3. How much time do you spend reading a newspaper?
4. What kind of assumptions do you make when you read the first few lines of
a text?
5. Do you read every word in a tv schedule?
6. How do you think you best understand a text?
The tutor can provide feedback to his / her students by using this resource:
http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/reading/stratread.htm
2.2. Learning Strategies
2.2.1. Have students read the text and reflect over the terms ‘feedback’ and
‘learning strategies’.
2.2.2 Having read the text, students will answer the following questions:
What learning strategies are mentioned in the reading?
Answer: inferences, imagery and summaries.
What are teachers, learners, and parents’ role when developing learning
strategies?
Answer: Teachers’ role: Teachers should give supportive feedback by
praising students, echoing their voice, and providing the environment for
them to share their learning strategies.
Parents’ role: Parents should be informed about student’s learning strategies
so they can help them learning at home. (Especially for young learners)
How do you develop you own learning strategies? How do you coach your
students’ learning strategies? Do you provide feedback? How often?
Answer: Answers may vary. Students may list among their reading
strategies: highlighting, making notes on the left side of the page,
summarizing, and mapping, among others. There might be students who are
not currently teaching a course, so they will not be able to answer all the
questions. Those who are currently teaching may explain the way and how
often they coach their students to enhance their reading strategies.
2.3 Grammar (Self - Assessment activities)
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
172
2.3.1 Students will analyze the texts answer the next questions:
Item Text A Text B
What is the main
topic?
Transfer of strategy training Transfer of strategy training
Is it an academic text? Yes, it is. No, it is not.
Are there any quotes? Yes, there are two.
(Brown et al. 1983). (O’Malley & Chamot, 1990)
No, there are not.
Does it contain
nominalized forms?
Yes, it does.
“…new tasks can be
maximized…”
No, it does not.
If any, do you think
the sources are
reliable?
Yes, because they quote
experts and dates of
published articles or books.
There aren’t any.
Does it contain
referencing?
No, it does not. No, it does not.
2.3.2 Students will compare the two paragraphs and will list the points they think
have been corrected in the academic text.
Answers:
a. There are nominalized forms.
b. There are cited sources or quotations.
c. Academic vocabulary has been included.
2.3.3 Nominalization
a. Students will change the words into nouns. Answers:
b. solution
c. instructions
d. introduction
e. care
f. intention
g. application
2.3.4 Personal pronouns
a. Students will read the text.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
173
b. Students will rewrite the text using higher lexis to make it more academic.
Answers may vary from student to student, but an example is provided.
In (the name of the school), there are the very polite and the very rude. No interest
on the matter can be noticed on the administrative area. Safe is one of students
concerns since they are told what to do by other intimidating students. Many
students think it is worthy to study in (the name of the school) and feel affection
towards the institution. They would like to find a solution to the problem.
c. Students will write the passive and nominalized forms of the sentences into the
boxes.
After that, teachers set
objectives for student
achievement in content,
academic language, and
learning strategies
The objectives for student
achievement in content,
academic language, and
learning strategies are set
by teachers
Objective Setting
Next, teachers assemble
the materials that will
assist them in making the
unit or lesson meaningful
to the students
Materials are assembled
by teachers
Material creation
Finally, the teacher
outlines the sequence of
instruction that will enable
students to understand,
remember and recall the
concepts and processes
taught.
Sequence of instruction…
is outlined by the teacher
Instruction sequence
d. Students will write the learning strategies instruction process as a text.
2.3.5 Referencing
Exercises
a. The cited quotations in the unit are:
Brown et al.1983 in 2.3.1 Text A
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
174
O’Malley & Chamot, 1990 in 2.3.1 Text A
Noonan (1985) in 2.3.3
Driscoll and Brizee (2011) in 2.3.5
Task (Forum Activity)
This is the introductory message to be hung on the forum:
Dear students,
Welcome to the second forum activity in unit 9. You will notice that this is the
second task in which you will provide your feedback to a text. This is also called
peer correction. This forum activity will last from 00/00/00 to 00/00/00, during this
week, this forum chain will be opened to assure your participation. I am sure you
will all participate actively to share your knowledge and experiences in the field.
This activity will be organized in the following way:
1. You will receive a text written by a previous student of the TEFL program. You
will read the text and suggest corrections to mistakes taking into account the
content learnt in unit 4, and the concepts of register, nominalization,
referencing and modality.
2. Post your feedback and include an explanation of how these problems affect
motivation and academic language learning, and the learning strategies,
which in your opinion, can help students to overcome those issues.
3. On 00/00/00, I will post my feedback and the forum will be closed.
Please be respectful when writing your opinion and take into account that despite
not being an assignment, academic language use will be expected. Use no more
than 350 words on each post; this will make the activity more enjoyable for all.
This is the new message with the text:
Dear students,
This is the text you will study to complete the second task on unit 9. Please read
the instructions given on my last post.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
175
“From my point of view, when somebody picks language in the environment where
he/she is living, is a way of surviving, because they try to make themselves
understood and it becomes the first way of exposure of language without
considering grammar details. This is the way how infants learn too; That is the
reason why many people consider that the best age to learn English is when you
are a child, I think that it can be, but only if an infant is sorrunded by the English
environment, it means that the child has to listen to his/her parents speaking
English all the time too and his/her parents have to build this environment with
English, using TV series, reading, music, toys, etc. And this is the way how we learn
our first or native language though.”
2.4 Genres
2.4.3 Task
Students will identify the writing strategies in the text and will send the tutor a mail
with the examples found for each one. The writing strategies in the text are the
following ones:
Examples to explain: “There are various of folklore sayings, such as, ‘you are as
many times a man, as many languages you speak’ (Slavic proverb), or that you live
as many lives as many languages you know (Czeck folk song).”
Process narration: “In the twenty-first century, the process of globalization has
expanded further than ever, and people all over the world are becoming more
and more interconnected. Whether one is working for a big international
corporation, or frequently travels abroad for leisure, enjoys watching foreign
movies with the original soundtrack, or simply wants to widen ones horizons,
learning a second, or third language, is always a wonderful decision.”
Contrast: “However, while most of the developed and developing world is very
keen on learning more than just the native language of their home country,
Americans tend to skip this part of education, or learn foreign languages rather
perfunctorily.”
Detailing: “To put this into perspective, 86.1% of Germans, 74% of Swedes and
59.6% of Russians are fluent in at least one foreign language. This number is
even higher amongst some of the Asian population.”
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
176
Comparison: “While Americans also have Spanish, German, French and
Japanese classes in their high school and college curricula, the quality of
knowledge that American children and teenagers get, is considerably lower.”
Classification: “Learning languages, at an early age, is good for several reasons.
First, it helps a child to effectively develop their organs of articulation and speak
more clearly, including, in their native tongue (Jesse et al., 2010). Secondly, learning
another language means widening one’s mental outlook, becoming more adept and
knowledgeable about the world’s various cultures and perspectives. Finally, learning
a language greatly contributes to the general brain development, especially at an
early age, but also at any age.”
Cause and effect: “Depriving American kids and teenagers from learning another
language, automatically means neglecting their future development.”
3. Knowledge Bank
Here, the tutor can encourage students to search on the web for more
information on the topics.
4. Check your knowledge
4.1 Learn to learn
Students will complete the chart below in order to establish what they learnt about
Description, Explanation, and Academic Grammar. In the first chart they will write a
short explanation of the main concepts you learned on learning strategies, register,
nominalization, referencing, and modality, and descriptions and explanations as
academic texts. In the second chart students will write a short description of how
they learned the main contents of the unit, including the learning strategies they
came across during the learning process.
Answers may vary from student to student. An example is given for the tutor:
What students learned How they learned
Nominalization is turning a part of
the speech in a noun. It permits a
Practicing turning verbs and
adjectives into nouns. (Exercises at
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
177
writer to make a text more
academic.
word level)
Practicing turning a sentence into
passive and then into
nominalization. (Exercises at
sentence level)
Practicing using nominalization into
paragraphs and texts that I have
published in the forum. (Exercise at
text level)
5. Communication
Final task
5.1.1 Essay writing:
The final task for units 9 is writing a 250-word essay. Students will choose a
topic from a list given by the tutor. For unit 9 the text must include descriptive and
explanatory paragraphs in which students will make use of the academic grammar
and precise vocabulary learnt during the unit. The document must be sent to the
tutor in order to assess the product and provide feedback.
It is necessary to make clear that for the final task the tutor will follow the task-
based approach, so this task will parallel an activity that they normally use in
communicative circumstances. To complete these tasks, students would previously
have developed smaller tasks such writing paragraphs or completing self-
assessment readings and exercises. Focus on language and meaning will be also
key premises to be taken into account when writing each essay. The formal
requirements to be fulfilled when writing the final task are: Length: 250 words,
Type of font: Arial or Times New Roman, Size: 11, Line height: 1.5, Alignment:
Justified.
These are the topics from which students can choose:
How to improve Reading strategies
How to improve Writing strategies
How to improve learning strategies
How to become independent learners
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
178
These are the aspects tutor will have into account to grade the essay:
The essay will be scored analytically using a 6-point scale rubric. Each score-
point is aligned to a level in the Common European Framework Reference. Test-
takers will need at least 40 points to pass the final task.
Raw Score Language Level
60 C2
50 C1
40 B2
30 B1
20 A2
10 A1
Total Raw Score = Up to 60 points. The score-points will be selecting using the
following criteria: The rater will select a level for each category in the scoring rubric
that best represents the student’s essay. That is, the rater will select a level
descriptor for Focus (F); Development Organization (DO); Linguistic and Lexical
Choices (LLC); and Conventions (C).
Writing Scoring Rubric
C2 C1 B2 B1 A2 A 1
F The essay is
focused and
purposeful
The essay is
focused on the
topic
The essay is
focused on the
topic and
includes few,
if any, loosely
related ideas
The essay is
focused but
may contain
ideas that are
loosely
connected to
the topic
The essay
addresses the
topic but may
lose focus by
including
extraneous or
loosely related
ideas
The essay
does not
addresses the
topic
D The
development
of the support
is substantial,
specific,
relevant, and
concrete
The support is
developed
through ample
use of specific
details and
examples
The support is
consistently
developed,
but it may
lack specificity
Development
of support
may be
uneven
The
development
of the support
may be erratic
and
nonspecific,
and ideas may
be repeated
There is little,
if any,
development
of supporting
ideas, and the
support may
consist of
generalizations
or
fragmentary
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
179
4. Additional tasks
Additional readings and exercises will be used wisely by the teacher to help those
students who might have problems when understanding or performing any of the
unit contents. Low-track students may find it necessary to go further and read
more material or do more exercises on the topic they are learning. All the same,
these activities will be helpful for those students who are used to go further and like
to find more information on what they are learning. Tutors should encourage
students to use this material (if necessary).
The additional readings section proposes the next activities:
Self – Evaluated task 1
lists
O The essay is
well organized
with effective
use of
transitions
The essay is
well organized
but may lack
some
transitions
The essay is
generally
organized, but
has few or no
transitions
among
sections
The essay is
organized in
parts of the
essay; other
parts are
disjointed
and/or lack
transitions
The essay is
disorganized
in much of the
essay; OR is
clear, but too
brief
The essay
exhibits little
or no apparent
organization
LL
C
Consistently
exhibits
variety in
sentence
structure and
word choice
Exhibits some
variety in
sentence
structure and
uses good
word choice;
occasionally,
words may be
used
inaccurately
Most
sentences are
well
constructed
but have
similar
structure;
word choice
lacks variety
or flair
Sentence
structure may
be simple and
unvaried;
word choice is
mostly
accurate
Sentences
lack formal
structure;
word choice
may often be
inaccurate
Sentences
run-on and
appear
incomplete or
rambling;
word choices
may be
inaccurate in
much or the
entire essay
C Few errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling,
but they do
not interfere
with
understanding
Some errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling,
but they do
not interfere
with
understanding
More frequent
errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling,
but they do
not interfere
with
understanding
Errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling
sometimes
interfere with
understanding
Errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling
interfere with
understanding
in much of the
essay
Errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling
prevent
readers from
fully
understanding
essay
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
180
Have the students read the low – level complexity text in which students will follow
instructions to complete a task. The instructions are precise and ask the student to
complete a chart, use the formal requirements given and publish the information on
the forum under a given title.
Self – Evaluated task 2
Have the students read the average – level complexity text “Brain-Based Learning
Strategies: Get Students’ Attention with a Radish” in which students will anticipate
what the text is about, it will also permit the student recover previous knowledge on
the matter. After reading the text students will answer the questions proposed. They
will have to publish the information on the forum when the task is completed. The
tutor will provide feedback.
Self – Evaluated task 3
Have the students read the article and summarize its main ideas through a map.
“Second Language Acquisition – Essential Information” is a high – level complexity
text that presents a model of sequences for describing and explaining. Students will
reinforce the contents in the students’ book unit 9 and will develop their reading
strategies. After mapping the summary of the text, students will publish the
information on the forum.
The additional exercises section proposes the next activities:
Self – Evaluated task 1
Have the students complete a low – level complexity academic grammar exercise.
There, they will rewrite two quotes with correct punctuation. Thus, students will
practice knowledge acquired on previous units of the EAP Course.
Self – Evaluated task 2
Have the students complete a low – level complexity academic grammar exercise.
There, they will check the correct sentence. Identification of mistakes in a sentence
level will help student consolidate the revising and editing steps when writing a text.
Mistakes have been carefully chosen because they are their recurrence on the
academic texts.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
181
Self – Evaluated task 3
Have the students complete an average – level complexity academic grammar
exercise. There, they will organize the sentences to create a coherent text with main
thesis and supportive ideas. To complete the task, students will take into account the
connective devices learnt in unit 9.
Self – Evaluated task 4
Have the students read the essay. Then students will decide whether the highlighted
words are correctly used or not. They will have to correct those words which are not
correct. Words have been carefully chosen because they are easy to confuse and
their common use on the academic texts. Student will enhance their academic
vocabulary and grammar.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
182
Appendix X: Teacher’s book unit 10
TEACHER’S BOOK UNIT 10
Argumentation and Academic Vocabulary
1. Previous observations
In this Unit Students will learn how to:
• Master Academic Vocabulary
• Argument a case/situation in an understandable and organized way.
The main contents to be covered are:
• Characteristics of Academic Argumentations
• Steps to write Academic Argumentations
• Develop students’ ideas further and deeper to show critical thinking
• Basic knowledge about CALL
The main objectives for each section are:
• To understand argumentations as essential texts of the academic discourse.
• To activate student’s prior knowledge and experience on the matter and
assist them to set their goals for this unit.
• To acquaint students with their own learning strategies when they remember
what they have learnt.
• To evaluate reading comprehension skills and to make a diagram as a study
strategy.
• To recognize and use academic vocabulary to write academic texts.
• To analyze and recognize the structure of an argumentative text.
• To enhance knowledge on academic vocabulary.
• To enhance knowledge on argumentative essays.
• To assess education knowledge, academic vocabulary, and genre conceptual
knowledge.
• To write a short essay on a given topic related to ‘CALL’.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
183
2. Before starting
Every activity proposed will be guided and supported by the tutor through
constant interaction with students. The main meaning of communication will be the
Forum. It is there where the tutor will post the instructions every Friday. Instructions
must be clear and concise, since they are the base for a good understanding and
development of the unit.
This is the welcome message for unit 10 (to be posted on Friday on the Forum):
Forum Instructions
Dear students,
Welcome to unit 10. In this paper you will find some important information to
guide you through the contents and academic activities to be covered and
completed during this week. As you all may know, this week will last from 00/00/00
to 00/00/00, and the activities have been scheduled in order for you to do the best
and following the due dates. I am sure you will all participate actively in each one
of them to share your knowledge and experiences in the field. The tutorial dates
indicated above are the days I will be available to answer all your questions via the
VC mail or my personal mail.
Chat sessions are highly recommendable. It is important to organize dates and
time slots and to use this tool as frequently as possible to discuss a variety of
issues such as the self-evaluated tasks, the debate, the assignments, differences of
opinion about academic issues, problems with the platform, the material and so on.
Here is some information you need for this week:
1. Contents
This week you will get and share knowledge about Academic Writing:
Argumentation, and Academic Vocabulary. The main contents to be covered are:
Characteristics of Academic argumentations
Steps to write Academic argumentations
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
184
Develop your ideas further and deeper to show critical thinking
Basic knowledge about CALL
2. Additional Readings
Additional readings were carefully chosen to enhance ideas and concepts about
the strategic and educational topics discussed during the week. They are available
through the platform icon “additional readings”.
3. Activities
Activities have been scheduled in order to fulfill the 10 hours of the study week.
However, you can always modify the time to your own schedule without interfering
with the due dates. There are two extra hours to work on extra readings and
exercises:
Day 1: (Friday) Cover Reading and activities. 1 hour.
Day 2: Language in context activities (learning to learn). 1 hour.
Day 3: Language in context activities (education knowledge). 1 hour.
Day 4: Language in context activities (vocabulary). 1 hour.
Day 5: Language in context activities (genre). 1 hour.
Day 6: Knowledge Bank. (Vocabulary and Genre). 1 hour.
Day 7: Communication: Genre. 2 hours.
4. Assessment
4.1 Forum
Students will identify and evaluate the efficacy of their memory when remembering
what they have learnt by drawing a curved line on a graph. Under the graph they
will explain enumerate the top 5 strategies they use to remember their lessons. The
graph and strategies will be uploaded to the forum.
• Students will compare their graphs with the ones drawn by their partners,
and suggest ways to improve and/ or overcome the problem of forgetting what was
learnt.
• The teacher will give feedback to students at the forum.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
185
4.2 Self-evaluated tasks
The self-evaluated tasks are very important as self-assessment tools; please
make sure you do them. However, there is no grade allotted to the self-evaluated
tasks. These include:
• Students will activate their previous knowledge on the topic, and will
anticipate the unit content by answering a list of 5 questions given by the tutor.
• Students will read ‘Does the Internet Encourage Youth to Steal? Are they
Cheaters?’ and answer some comprehension questions on the text. Then, they will
draw a diagram with the thesis and supporting arguments of the text. They will
upload their diagrams to a google.doc document to be reviewed by the tutor in
order for her to provide feedback.
• Students will read the Academic Word List (AWL) compiled by Averil
Coxhead in 1998, which will be provided by the tutor, and do cloze exercises to put
into practice the academic vocabulary given. The tutor will correct the exercises on
his/her mail.
• Students will answer to reflective questions which will lead them to reflect
upon the main characteristics of an argumentative text. The answers will be sent to
the teacher by e-mail.
• Students will complete a ‘Now I know’ checklist. They will mark a check if
they know, X if they do not know, and will give a further explanation on how they
learned the main contents of the unit, including the learning strategies they came
across during the learning process. The checklist will be sent to the tutor by e-mail.
4.3 Assignment
The assignment due dates are clearly stated. Submitting your assignment on
time will assure that this will not be marked late (due to time differences). The final
date for submission mentioned on the VC assignment file will go beyond the due
date by a few days, please do not get confused because the extra days are for late
submissions and if you choose to submit your assignments after the due date you
would lose a point.
If you do not submit an assignment or if you get a failing grade, you will need to
resubmit the assignment. Finally, it is very important that you submit your
assignments on the Moodle Platform only, paying very close attention to the given
instructions. And please pay attention to the quality, format and quantity factors of
your assignment. The assignment for this week is:
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
186
• Essay writing. Students will choose a topic from a list given by the tutor and
write a two-page essay. The text must include argumentative paragraphs with valid
supporting reasons to convince the reader. Students will make use of the academic
grammar and precise vocabulary learnt in units 9 and 10. The document must be
sent to the tutor in order to assess the product and provide feedback.
• Students can choose to share their essay with a partner in order to make
peer correction before sending the paper to the tutor (Optional).
I wish you all the best during this week.
Warm regards,
María Fernanda Jaime Osorio
Weeks 9 and 10 tutor
3. Assessment
The unit assessment will take place all over the time the unit last (10 hours) and
will have different presentations. Active participation by students is expected in
every single activity since they are beneficial for academic language learning.
Previous micro tasks will prepare students to complete the final task, allowing them
to have a better chance to succeed in the course.
Activities
Unit 10 proposes five self-assessment activities, one collaborative writing wiki,
and an individual activity to be sent by mail. The self-assessment activities are
consciousness – raising tasks and the collaborative and individual activities are
focused – communication tasks. Consciousness – raising tasks will also take place
in those activities in which students will be asked to clarify what they have
interpreted about any of those activities, thus, students will build inner knowledge
about the language and how to become a better user of it.
The forum activities and the creation of a wiki will permit co-assessment, since
through these tools for nature students have to create collaborative content and
post their opinion to build knowledge. Formative assessment will be also carried out
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
187
by means of the feedback the tutor will provide students once they have submitted
their assignments. All the same, for the final task, the tutor will carry out a
summative assessment where not only he/she will take into account the units’
acquired practical knowledge, but the practical applicability of the contents from
former units. Finally, when self-assessing themselves, students will deal with the
identification of their strengths and weaknesses, especially with the topic of
Learning Strategies.
The student’s book activities and tasks will prepare the students to develop their
skills and become autonomous learners. They are also pre stages to complete the
final task. These are the proposed additional tasks and their possible answers.
1. Cover
1.1 Activate your knowledge (Self- Assessment activity)
Have students read this introductory text. Students will reflect upon the kind of
academic texts they know and their characteristics of those, by answering five
reflective questions:
What kind of academic texts do you know?
Answer: Answers may vary, but students could include in their list the ones
they learnt in unit 9: Descriptions and explanations.
Why do you think academic texts are important?
Answer: Answers may vary, but students could mention what they learnt in
unit 9: Because academic texts help you achieve goals and succeed in
academic and business life.
What is an argument?
Answer: Answers may vary, but the definition of an argument is according to
The Argument Center “expressing a point of view on a subject and
supporting it with evidence”.
Have you ever written an argument? If so, what were the main
characteristics of your argument?
Answer: Answers may vary, but those students who have written an
argument could list as characteristics the statement of a thesis and
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
188
supportive arguments, the use of examples, statistics, and clear evidence to
persuade the reader to take their position.
2. Language in Context
2.1 Learn to learn (Forum Activity)
In this activity students will identify and evaluate the efficacy of their memory when
remembering what they have learnt by drawing a curved line on the graph “How
much of a lesson do you remember?”
As this a forum activity, they will be provided with the environment to share their
experiences and at the same time, they will have the chance to feedback other
students about how to enhance their study methods. Thus, collaborative learning
will take place being the students the center of their learning process. The tutor will
also provide feedback, generating confidence to students.
This is the introductory message to be hung on the forum:
Dear students,
Welcome to the first forum activity in unit 10. You will notice that this is the first
task in which you and your partner will share your knowledge about the strategies
you daily use to remember what you have learnt from a lesson. This forum activity
will last from 00/00/00 to 00/00/00. During this week this forum chain will be
opened to assure your participation. I am sure you will all participate actively to
share your knowledge and experiences in the field.
This activity will be organized in the following way:
4. I will open a new chain of messages in which you will be presented an
example of the graph as a model to follow in the creation of your own graph.
5. After understanding the example, you will create your own graph. Use a
word document and attach it to your message. In the graph, you will identify
how your memory works in relation to the time it takes to forget a lesson.
The message has to contain the top 5 strategies you use to remember your
lessons.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
189
6. Read a partners message and compare his/her graph to your own. Then,
suggest ways to improve and/or overcome the problem of forgetting what
was learnt.
7. On 00/00/00, I will post my feedback and the forum will be closed.
Please be respectful when writing your opinion and take into account that despite
not being an assignment, academic language use will be expected. Use no more
than 350 words on each post; this will make the activity more enjoyable for all.
2.2. Computer Language Learning: Internet influence on learners.
2.2.1. Have students read the article.
2.2.2 Having read the text, students will answer the following questions:
What controversial issue is being argued in the text?
Answer: Plagiarism and the way to avoid it.
The title of the article poses two questions. The answer to these questions is
the main thesis of the text. Can you identify the answer?
Answer:
The Net Generation don’t see downloading music, software, games, or
movies without paying for it as stealing. They think this is a case of a
business model that needs to be changed.
Along the text there are three supportive reasons to the main thesis.
Identify them and list them
Answer:
a. This old model of owning and selling music makes no sense for this
entire generation, or for anyone else for that matter. It is a classic
example of a disruptive technology.
b. Tell Net Geners what intellectual property in the corporate world is
confidential, and set rules about cated problem.
c. The internet makes it easy to plagiarize in the university, but studies
show that plagiarism appears to have gone up by eight percentage
points since the early 1960s.
After reading the text. Do you think the Internet encourage Youth to Steal?
Do you think they are Cheaters? Write your answer using your own words.
Answer: Answers may vary. In their answer students should use the
expressions “I think that…. Because”, “I consider that…. Because”, “I believe
that…. Because”.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
190
2.2.3 Having read the text, students will draw a diagram with the thesis and
supporting arguments of the text. They should upload the diagram to a google doc
and share it with the tutor through the forum.
Answer: Answers may vary. An example is provided for the tutor:
2.3 Vocabulary
2.3.1 Think about it! (Self-Assessment activity)
Students will answer the following reflective questions:
In what ways do you think academic vocabulary will contribute to your
successful studies at university?
Answer: Answers may vary. Students may list among their reasons:
Because academic vocabulary use allows a precise communication, it also
permits enrich a language use, and it lets people communicate better with
others and convey meanings among cultures.
What techniques do you already use to learn academic vocabulary?
Answer: Answers may vary. Students may list among their techniques:
Memorization of lists of new words, practice of new words use in written
sentences and spoken discourse, creation of diagrams, use of pictures, among
others.
2.3.2 Students will study the examples and select one word to best express what the
author means in the sentences given.
Answer: Answers may vary. The options are provided for the tutor:
a. Indicates, suggests, claims, believes.
b. Suggests, supports, illustrates.
c. Proposes, suggests.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
191
2.3.3.1 Students will complete the blanks with precise verbs from the table.
Answers: Answers may vary, but the original text contains the next verbs: Believes,
argues, maintains, states, offer, believes, suggest, argue, maintains, assumes.
2.4 Genres
2.4.1 In groups of two or three, students will create document on google docs or any
other online wiki tool. Step by step, students will follow the instructions given in the
students’ book to complete the task of creating an argument collaboratively.
Answers: Answers may vary, but the product text must contain the next steps:
Step 1. Choose the issue
Step 2. Take a position
Step 3. Construct an argument, support your arguments and anticipate likely
objections.
Step 4. Reflect on the process.
2.4.2 Basic features of arguing a position
Have students read the summary of the section.
2.4.2.1 Let’s remember.
Students will use their own voice to remember this section. Students will use their
own words to explain the main steps to create an argument. They will explain the
steps.
3. Knowledge Bank
By studying this section, students will remember what they learnt in unit 10. Web
sites are suggested for further revising.
4. Check your knowledge
4.1 Learn to learn (Self-Assessment activity)
4.1.1 Have students complete the checklist to remember the contents in the units,
expressing the learning strategies they came across.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
192
Now I know Yes No How I
learned it
Need
further
study
What an academic argumentation is
The characteristics of academic
argumentations
The steps to construct academic
argumentation
Why academic writing is important
to academic success
Precise verbs to introduce authors
and sources
Discourse markers
To write an academic argument
using precise verbs to introduce
authors and sources, and discourse
markers as cohesive devices
This activity will help the tutor identify low-track students and this way he/she can
help them by proposing the extra readings and exercises.
5. Communication
5.1 Genres
Final task
5.1.1 Essay writing. The final task for unit 10 is writing a 250-word essay.
Students will choose a topic from a list given by the tutor. For unit 10, the text
must include arguments with plausible reasons to convince the reader about a point
of view. The document must be sent to the tutor in order to assess the product and
provide feedback.
It is necessary to make clear that for the final task the tutor will follow the task-
based approach, so this task will parallel an activity that they normally use in
communicative circumstances. To complete these tasks, students would previously
have developed smaller tasks such writing paragraphs or completing self-
assessment readings and exercises. Focus on language and meaning will be also
key premises to be taken into account when writing each essay. The formal
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
193
requirements to be fulfilled when writing the final task are: Length: 250 words,
Type of font: Arial or Times New Roman, Size: 11, Line height: 1.5, Alignment:
Justified.
These are the topics from which students can choose:
Will computers replace teachers?
Is CALL beneficial to language learners?
Do all the online language courses benefit language learners?
Reflections on the EAP course. Has it worked out for me?
These are the aspects tutor will have into account to grade the essay:
The essay will be scored analytically using a 6-point scale rubric. Each score-
point is aligned to a level in the Common European Framework Reference. Test-
takers will need at least 40 points to pass the final task.
Raw Score Language Level
60 C2
50 C1
40 B2
30 B1
20 A2
10 A1
Total Raw Score = Up to 60 points. The score-points will be selecting using the
following criteria: The rater will select a level for each category in the scoring rubric
that best represents the student’s essay. That is, the rater will select a level
descriptor for Focus (F); Development Organization (DO); Linguistic and Lexical
Choices (LLC); and Conventions (C).
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
194
Writing Scoring Rubric
C2 C1 B2 B1 A2 A 1
F The essay is
focused and
purposeful
The essay is
focused on the
topic
The essay is
focused on the
topic and
includes few,
if any, loosely
related ideas
The essay is
focused but
may contain
ideas that are
loosely
connected to
the topic
The essay
addresses the
topic but may
lose focus by
including
extraneous or
loosely related
ideas
The essay
does not
addresses the
topic
D The
development
of the support
is substantial,
specific,
relevant, and
concrete
The support is
developed
through ample
use of specific
details and
examples
The support is
consistently
developed,
but it may
lack specificity
Development
of support
may be
uneven
The
development
of the support
may be erratic
and
nonspecific,
and ideas may
be repeated
There is little,
if any,
development
of supporting
ideas, and the
support may
consist of
generalizations
or
fragmentary
lists
O The essay is
well organized
with effective
use of
transitions
The essay is
well organized
but may lack
some
transitions
The essay is
generally
organized, but
has few or no
transitions
among
sections
The essay is
organized in
parts of the
essay; other
parts are
disjointed
and/or lack
transitions
The essay is
disorganized
in much of the
essay; OR is
clear, but too
brief
The essay
exhibits little
or no apparent
organization
LL
C
Consistently
exhibits
variety in
sentence
structure and
word choice
Exhibits some
variety in
sentence
structure and
uses good
word choice;
occasionally,
words may be
used
inaccurately
Most
sentences are
well
constructed
but have
similar
structure;
word choice
lacks variety
or flair
Sentence
structure may
be simple and
unvaried;
word choice is
mostly
accurate
Sentences
lack formal
structure;
word choice
may often be
inaccurate
Sentences
run-on and
appear
incomplete or
rambling;
word choices
may be
inaccurate in
much or the
entire essay
C Few errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling,
but they do
not interfere
with
understanding
Some errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling,
but they do
not interfere
with
understanding
More frequent
errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling,
but they do
not interfere
with
understanding
Errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling
sometimes
interfere with
understanding
Errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling
interfere with
understanding
in much of the
essay
Errors in
grammar,
punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling
prevent
readers from
fully
understanding
essay
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
195
4. Additional tasks
Additional readings and exercises will be used wisely by the teacher to help
those students who might have problems when understanding or performing any of
the unit contents. Low-track students may find it necessary to go further and read
more material or do more exercises on the topic they are learning. All the same,
these activities will be helpful for those students who are used to go further and like
to find more information on what they are learning. Tutors should encourage
students to use this material (if necessary). All the activities answers should be
sent to the tutor via mail, so students can get the feedback.
The additional readings section proposes the next activities:
Self – Evaluated task 1
Have the students read the low – level complexity text “Online Courses” and answer
the four multiple choice comprehension questions proposed.
Self – Evaluated task 2
Have the students read the average – level complexity text “CALL Use in the ESL/EFL
Language Classroom” and answer the four multiple choice comprehension questions
proposed.
Self – Evaluated task 3
Have the students read the essay to complete a chart in which they will identify the
main thesis and the three supportive arguments. “The Effect of Using Computer-
Assisted Language Learning” is a high – level complexity text that presents a model
of argumentative text. Students will reinforce the contents in the students’ book unit
10.
The additional exercises section proposes the next activities:
Self – Evaluated task 1
Have the students complete a low – level complexity exercise. There, they will match
the word with its definition. Words have been chosen because their common use on
the academic texts and they will enhance student’s academic vocabulary.
COURSE DESIGN PROJECT
196
Self – Evaluated task 2
Have the students complete a low – level complexity exercise. There, they will check
if the words in every item are similar or different. Discrimination of words synonyms
and antonyms will help student to choose the precise vocabulary he/she needs when
writing a text. Words have been carefully chosen because they are easy to confuse
and their common use on the academic texts. Student will enhance their academic
vocabulary.
Self – Evaluated task 3
Have the students complete an average – level complexity exercise. There, they will
choose the best word from the multiple choice list to complete the sentence.
Discrimination of words will help student to choose the precise vocabulary he/she
needs when writing a text. Words have been carefully chosen because they are easy
to confuse and their common use on the academic texts. Student will enhance their
academic vocabulary.
Self – Evaluated task 4
Have the students complete this essay by filling the blanks with the academic
vocabulary provided on the chart. This is a high – level complexity exercise that
presents academic vocabulary use at essay-level. Words have been carefully chosen
because they are easy to confuse and their common use on the academic texts.
Student will enhance their academic vocabulary.