TENTATIVE AGENDA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE …...2018/05/02 · 2. SETRPC staff attended a TxDOT...

TENTATIVE AGENDA

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING

JEFFERSON-ORANGE-HARDIN REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY (JOHRTS) AREA

South East Texas Regional Planning Commission

Transportation Conference Room

Thursday, June 9, 2016 10:00 a.m.

I. PRESENTATION ON WEB-BASED TRAFFIC COUNT MAP FOR THE JOHRTS AREA

-Robert Benz, Texas A&M Transportation Institute

II. PRESENTATION ON FY 2016 JOHRTS UPWP WORK TASK 5-SPECIAL STUDIES-TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION

-Andy Mullins, Texas A&M Transportation Institute

III. OTHER BUSINESS

IV. SET NEXT MEETING DATE

V. ADJOURNMENT

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MINUTES OF THE

JEFFERSON-ORANGE-HARDIN REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY (JOHRTS) AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE (TPC)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE: March 31, 2016 TIME: 10:00 a.m. PLACE: South East Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC) Homer E. Nagel Conference Room, Beaumont, TX ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. ROLL CALL OF VOTING MEMBERS AND CERTIFICATION OF A QUORUM

Mayor Don Surratt, City of Lumberton, called the meeting to order, welcomed guests, and certified the presence of a quorum.

II. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Mayor Don Surratt, City of Lumberton, recommended the adoption of the agenda as presented. There were no objections.

III. MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING – December 10, 2015 Mayor Don Surratt, City of Lumberton, called for a motion to adopt the minutes as prepared and distributed. L.W. Cooper, Commissioner, Hardin County, made the motion and Jody Crump, Commissioner, Orange County, seconded the motion which carried unanimously.

IV. REPORT ON THE STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES

Bob Dickinson, Director, Transportation and Environmental

Resources Division, SETRPC Adam Jack-Director, Transportation Planning & Development, TxDOT-Beaumont District

STATUS ON SETRPC-MPO PLANNING ACTIVITIES

The South East Texas Regional Planning Commission – Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) staff continued work on the following activities:


1. Staff attended a TEMPO meeting on January 4, 2016.

2. Staff attended the Texas Transportation Forum on January 4-6, 2016 in Austin.

3. Staff attended a Neches River Bridge Stakeholder meeting at the Port of Beaumont on February 24, 2016.

4. The SETRPC-MPO staff continued the process to develop a timeline for updating

the JOHRTS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)-2045.

5. The SETRPC-MPO will hold a comment period for the Draft JOHRTS 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Draft Revised JOHRTS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)-2040 and have scheduled four public meetings during the third week of April to gather public input on the documents.

6. The SETRPC-MPO staff held a JOHRTS Technical Committee meeting on

Thursday, February 25, 2016.

Mr. Adam Jack, Director, Transportation Planning & Development, TxDOT-Beaumont District, advised that to date this year there are thirty seven projects that have been released to construction. Twenty four of those have been processed to letting leaving twelve that should be let in September. He also stated that the Beaumont District is working with Mr. Bob Dickinson and the MPO on a “draft” Strategic Implementation Plan. The plan is to determine how to get IH-10 widened to six lanes from Winnie to the Louisiana border. Mr. Jack reminded the committee that since the South Texas State Fair is over, serious efforts are in progress at the FM 364/IH-10 interchange. This work will be consistent until it is finished prior to the next South Texas State Fair, so plan accordingly.

V. PRESENTATION ON IH-14 ACCESS INTO OUR SOUTHEAST TEXAS REGION

John Durkay, Legal Counsel, Southeast Texas Plant Manager’ Forum

Mr. John Durkay informed the committee that IH-14 is designed to link major military bases with their outload ports and is needed for multimodal highway transport. The Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition, which is made up of cities, counties, local authorities, and economic development organizations in Texas and Louisiana, has been working for more than a decade in support of highway upgrades that will improve access between Fort Bliss, Fort Hood, and Fort Polk to the Texas strategic deployment seaports of the Port of Corpus Christi and the Port of Beaumont. The Port of Beaumont, which is the world’s largest offload port, houses the 596th Army Battalion Transportation Group. The issue is the need for the last mile of highway transport to be constructed into our southeast Texas region. He advised that there is adequate TxDOT and refinery right of way to gain access to the Transportation Battalion’s facility in the Port of Beaumont. Possibilities were discussed and he then stated that this is not a simple or inexpensive TxDOT project, but is a feasible resolution to the Army transport problem. Mr. Durkay’s handouts and live stream video of the Transportation Planning Committee meeting can be viewed on the SETRPC’s website.

VI. ELECTION OF NEW JOHRTS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE OFFICERS FOR 2016-2017

Bob Dickinson, Director, Transportation and Environmental Resources Division, SETRPC

Mr. Dickinson explained that the JOHRTS TPC Multimodal Transportation Planning Jefferson-Orange-Hardin County Urban Planning Region by-laws require a new slate of officers be elected every two years. The officers revolve between Jefferson, Hardin, and Orange counties; therefore, a representative from Jefferson County will serve as Chairman, a representative from Orange County will serve as Vice-Chairman, and a representative from TxDOT will serve as Secretary. As the out-going 2014-2015 Chairman, Mayor Don Surratt, City of Lumberton, stated that a nominating committee composed of Mayor Glen Johnson, City of Port Neches, Commissioner L. W. Cooper, Hardin County, and Mayor Robert Viator, City of Vidor, recommend the new officers for the 2016-2017 TPC are as follows: Chairman: Commissioner Eddie Arnold, Jefferson County Vice-Chairman: Commissioner Jody Crump, Orange County Secretary: Tucker Ferguson, District Engineer, TxDOT-Beaumont

District Mayor Don Surratt, City of Lumberton, called for a motion to approve the election of the new officers. Jon Sherwin, Public Works Supervisor, City of West Orange, made the motion. L. W. Cooper, Commissioner, Hardin County, seconded the motion which carried unanimously.

VII. OTHER BUSINESS

Mayor Surratt, City of Lumberton, stated that he has been made aware that there is someone that would like to address the committee with regards to the 105 project. Ms. Leslie Barras, Attorney, introduced herself and advised that she is assisting and advising a number of groups that have concerns and objections about the proposed 105 toll road. She stated that at some time there will be a request for this project to be added to the TIP. She expressed the seriousness of such a decision and hopes that it will be given the utmost scrutiny and adequate public input since there are points that need to be further clarified. The first point relates to the definition of the project. When the proposal first came before the County Commissioners the understanding was it would be a local project for traffic relief within Vidor to Main Street. This is a very different concept than is being dealt with now, which is at least a four lane toll road through the heart of the Beaumont unit of the Big Thicket. Citizens now realize the impact and harm it would have on wildlife and the fact that there doesn’t seem to be a clear traffic or

economic benefit for Vidor, therefore, a definition and scope of the project need to be defined for the public. Secondly, Ms. Barras advised that she has been unable to get an answer as to whether the proposed road is going to be on the Federal-aid System or not. The need to determine, sooner than later, who is financially responsible for the long term care and maintenance for the proposal, including whether Orange County will ultimately bear a financial obligation. The proposal is based on a financial model which is deeply flawed from the prospective of public interest. This particular model has been used widely across the U.S. with disappointing results and there is a need for a closer look at these components so that the public isn’t ultimately responsible should there be a toll road operator default, as has happened in other areas of the country as well as the State of Texas. Ms. Barras thanked the committee for their time and added that it does not make sense to add the project to the TIP based on what we know now.

VIII. SET NEXT MEETING DATE

The next meeting date was set for Thursday, May 26, 2016. Mr. Dickinson also advised that there will be a meeting on Thursday, July 21, 2016.

IX. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Don Surratt, City of Lumberton, called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Steve Hamilton, Public Works Director, City of Nederland, made the motion. Gerald Robinson, Public Works Director, City of Bridge City, seconded the motion which carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:50 a.m.

MEMBERS PRESENT

Jody Crump Commissioner, Orange County Troy Foxworth Public Works Director, City of Groves Steve Stafford Engineering Supervisor, Jefferson County Tucker Ferguson District Engineer, TxDOT-Beaumont District Eddie Arnold Commissioner, Jefferson County L. W. Cooper Commissioner, Hardin County Steve Hamilton Public Works Director, City of Nederland Kelvin Knauf Director of Planning & Community Development, City

of Orange Gerald Robinson Public Works Director, City of Bridge City Jon Sherwin Public Works Supervisor, City of West Orange Don Surratt Mayor, City of Lumberton GUESTS PRESENT Mansour Shiraz MPO/Rural Planning Coordinator, TxDOT Scott Ayres Planning Engineer, TxDOT-Beaumont District Sarah Dupre Public Information Officer, TxDOT-Beaumont District Marc Shepherd Business Services Coordinator, TxDOT-Beaumont

District Travis Milner MPO/Rural Planning Coordinator, TxDOT - MPO

Coordination East Adam Jack Director, Transportation Planning & Development, TxDOT-Beaumont District Bruce Walker Executive Director, Big Thicket Association Bruce Drury Member, Big Thicket Association John Durkay Legal Counsel, SETX Plant Managers Forum Leslie Barras Attorney Dale M. Parish Citizen, Freelance Mary Bernard Citizen, Freelance Ellen Buchanan Citizen, Freelance Jan Ruppel Citizen, Freelance

SETRPC STAFF PRESENT Bob Dickinson Director, Transportation and Environmental Resources Robert Grimm Operations Manager, Transportation and

Environmental Resources Jimmie Lewis Transportation Planner III, Transportation and

Environmental Resources

President – Kirk Roccaforte, Bridge City ǀ 1st VP – Eddie Arnold, Jefferson County ǀ 2nd VP – Chris Kirkendall, Hardin County 3rd VP – Barry Burton, Orange County ǀ Treasurer – Rebecca Ford, Bevil Oaks, ǀ Secretary – Mary Adams, Kountze

Executive Director - Shaun P. Davis

2210 Eastex Freeway Beaumont, Texas 77703-4929 (409) 899-8444 ǀ (409) 347-0138 fax

[email protected] ǀ http://www.setrpc.org

May 26, 2016

STATUS ON SETRPC-MPO PLANNING ACTIVITIES


1. The SETRPC-MPO held a 30 day comment period for the Draft JOHRTS 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Draft Revised JOHRTS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)-2040 and held four public meetings during the third week of April to gather public input on the documents.

2. SETRPC staff attended a TxDOT sponsored Trans Cad Training workshop in Corpus

Christi during the second week of May.

3. SETRPC staff attended a TxDOT Saturation Count meeting at the TxDOT–Beaumont District office on Monday, May 9, 2016.

4. SETRPC staff attended a TxDOT-Beaumont District public meeting Monday, May 16,

2016, in Beaumont on the proposed improvements along U.S. 69 from Tram Road to Cooks Lake Road.

5. SETRPC staff developed the “DRAFT” FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for submission to TxDOT.

mailto:[email protected]

www.setrpc.org/ter

Please join us for a meeting about

Southeast Texas’ Transportation Programs!

Learn about the road, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and safety

projects that are proposed through Year 2040,

how much they will cost, and when they will happen.

Share your opinion on the proposed projects and provide

input on what you want to see in the future.

The public review and comment period will be held

April 04 – May 04, 2016.

The South East Texas Regional Planning Commission –

Metropolitan Planning Organization is responsible for planning

transportation improvements in Hardin, Jefferson, and

Orange Counties, and we hope to hear from you.

Please attend any meeting to provide input or submit

written comments by 5:00 PM, May 04, 2016 to:

Bob Dickinson, 2210 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703.

All comments received will be addressed and provided to the

Transportation Planning Committee for consideration.

For special needs requests, please contact Bob Dickinson at least 48

hours in advance at 409-899-8444 x 7520 or [email protected].

Thursday, April 14 Lumberton City Hall

836 North Main

Lumberton, Texas, 77657

3:00 PM

Monday, April 11 City of Port Arthur Public

Library

4615 9th Avenue

Port Arthur, Texas 77642

3:00 PM

Tuesday, April 12 City of Orange Public

Library

200 5th Street

Orange, Texas 77631

3:00 PM

Wednesday, April 13 South East Texas

Regional Planning

Commission

2210 Eastex Freeway

Beaumont, Texas 77703

3:00 PM

President – Fred Williams, Kountze ǀ 1st VP - Kirk Roccaforte, Bridge City ǀ 2nd VP - Eddie Arnold, Jefferson County 3rd VP - Chris Kirkendall, Hardin County ǀ Treasurer - David Dubose, Orange County ǀ Secretary – Rebecca Ford, Bevil Oaks




May 26, 2016 To: Jefferson-Orange-Hardin Regional Transportation Study (JOHRTS)

Transportation Planning Committee (TPC) From: Bob Dickinson, Director Transportation and Environmental Resources Division Subject: The JOHRTS 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Please find enclosed for your review and approval the DRAFT JOHRTS 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). If any questions arise, please feel free to contact me at (409) 899-8444 x7520. BD Enclosures


Transportation ImprovementProgram

30-day Public Comment Period April 4 2016 –May 4, 2016

South East Texas Regional PlanningCommission-Metropolitan PlanningOrganization (SETRPC-MPO) for

Regional Transportation Study (JOHRTS) Area

JOHRTS 2017-2020

September 30, 2020E�ective from October 1, 2016 to

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION

JOHRTS FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program

Table of Contents

Introduction

TIP Structure

JOHRTS Area Description

Federal and State Requirements

TIP Project Selection Process

Project Listing Information

Project Listings

Federally Funded Highway Projects

Grouped Projects

Federally Funded Transit Projects

State Funded Highway Projects

Locally Funded Regionally Significant Projects

Right-of-Way Projects

Feasibility Studies

Financial Summary

2

2

3

4

7

8

11

12

18

21

30

32

34

36

37

Appendices

Appendix A: Funding Categories

Appendix B: Exempt Project Criteria

Appendix C: Grouped Project Chart and Grouped Candidate Project Listing

Appendix D: Environmental Studies

Appendix E: Public Involvement Documentation

Appendix F: Revisions

A-1

B-1

C-1

D-1

E-1

F-1

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION

____________________________________________________________ JOHRTS FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program

1

INTRODUCTION

The South East Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC) was designated as the

Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Jefferson, Orange, and Hardin Counties by the

Governor of Texas in 1974. As such, the SETRPC-MPO provides a decision-making forum for

southeast Texas and is responsible for conducting a continuing, comprehensive, and

cooperative transportation planning process. The main purpose of the SETRPC-MPO is to

develop and maintain all transportation plans for the Jefferson-Orange-Hardin Regional

Transportation Study (JOHRTS) area.

The SETRPC-MPO’s short-range transportation plan is the Transportation Improvement

Program (TIP), which presents the various highway and transit projects that are expected to

be let for construction or implementation within the four year time frame covered. All

regional transportation projects and programs are required to be identified and prioritized in

the TIP in order to be eligible for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit

Administration (FTA) funds.

TIP STRUCTURE

The JOHRTS Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 – 2020 TIP is the short-range implementation portion of the

JOHRTS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). Developed through coordinated federal,

state, and local efforts, the MTP incorporates all regional transportation projects and

programs that are expected to be completed within its 20-25 year coverage period.

The SETRPC-MPO is required to conduct public involvement activities during TIP

developments and updates. These developments and updates must also be reviewed and

adopted by the JOHRTS Transportation Planning Committee (TPC), the MPO’s policy

committee that ensures that all transportation plans and programs are consistent with the

goals and objectives for the JOHRTS area.

The TIP contains a project listing that includes those projects funded within the four-year

period covered by the TIP and is divided into the following components:

Federally Funded Highway Projects

Grouped Projects

Federally Funded Transit Projects

State Funded Highway Projects

Photo courtesy of Marc Shepherd

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


2

Locally Funded Regionally Significant Projects

Other projects involving specific project development phases except for construction are

contained within the following project lists:

Right-of-Way Projects

Feasibility Studies

The following appendices are contained within the TIP:

Appendix A: Funding Categories

Appendix B: Exempt Project Criteria

Appendix C: Grouped Candidate Project Listing

Appendix D: Environmental Studies

Appendix E: Public Involvement Documentation

Appendix F: Revisions (Will contain information regarding future revisions)

JOHRTS AREA DESCRIPTION

The JOHRTS area consists of the three-county region of southeast Texas - Jefferson, Orange,

and Hardin Counties. The area covers the corporate limits of the cities of Beaumont, Bevil

Oaks, Bridge City, China,

Groves, Kountze, Lumberton,

Nederland, Nome, Orange, Pine

Forest, Pinehurst, Port Arthur,

Port Neches, Rose City, Rose

Hill Acres, Silsbee, Sour Lake,

Taylor Landing, Vidor, and West

Orange. Due to the

predominance of the

petrochemical industry and

their significance as major

manufacturing and industrial

centers, the larger cities of

Beaumont, Port Arthur, and

Orange are often referred to as

the “Golden Triangle.” The

JOHRTS area contains the

Beaumont and Port Arthur

urbanized areas, and is

characterized by agricultural,

industrial, and low-density

residential and commercial land uses.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


3

At the time of the 2010 Census, the JOHRTS area had a population of 388,745, an increase of

1% from the previous decade and the highest population ever recorded for the

three-county region. Hardin County saw the highest percentage of growth, with a 15%

increase in population; Jefferson County’s population increased by one tenth of a percentage

point, while Orange County lost about 4% of its population.

FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS

FAST Act, Fixing American Surface Transportation Act, was signed into law by President

Obama on December 4, 2015. The information in this section is provided to acknowledge the

existence of FAST Act and to note its implications for transportation planning. It is also

important to note that the emergence of FAST Act does not represent an abandonment of

the programs and planning requirements established under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible

and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and Moving Ahead

for Progress in 21st Century (MAP-21), the previous federal transportation bills. In fact, many

of the same programs and metropolitan planning requirements are continued under FAST

Act.

All transportation projects and programs must address the FAST Act planning factors in order

to provide a safe, energy-efficient, and environmentally sound movement of persons and

goods on the regional transportation system. These planning factors call for transportation

planning to:

1) Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global

competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;

2) Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized

users;

3) Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized

users;

4) Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight;

5) Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the

quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and

state and local planned growth and economic development patterns;

6) Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and

between modes, for people and freight;

7) Promote efficient system management and operation;

8) Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system;

9) Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or

mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and

10) Enhance travel and tourism

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


4

FAST Act continues the use of performance targets and measures at the national, state, and

local level established in MAP-21. All established performance targets and measures should

align with the national goals outlined in MAP-21, which are as follows:

Goal Area National Goal

Safety To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious

injuries on all public roads

Infrastructure

Condition

To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of

good repair

Congestion

Reduction

To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National

Highway System

System Reliability To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system

Freight

Movement and

Economic Vitality

To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of

rural communities to access national and international trade

markets, and support regional economic development

Environmental

Sustainability

To enhance the performance of the transportation system while

protecting and enhancing the natural environment

Reduced Project

Delivery Delays

To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and

expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating

project completion through eliminating delays in the project

development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory

burdens and improving agencies’ work practices

MPOs are required to set performance targets and measures after the United States

Department of Transportation and the State of Texas set national and state targets and

measures. The SETRPC-MPO will maintain awareness of the performance measures process at

both the federal and state level, and will implement performance measures at the MPO level

as appropriate. If the process of implementing performance measures requires additions or

changes to the MTP and TIP, the documents will be amended in the future.

TIP Financial Summary

Transportation legislation mandates fiscal responsibility in the preparation of all

transportation plans and programs. In particular, the TIP is required to include a financial

summary that outlines the source and amount of expected funds for all submitted projects.

FHWA and FTA funding requirements also mandate that all highway and transit projects

receiving federal, state, or locally-significant funding be identified and prioritized in the TIP. A

project may not be included in the TIP if full funding cannot be reasonably anticipated before

the project is let for construction or implementation.

Public Involvement

Citizen involvement remains an important component of the transportation planning process

in the JOHRTS area. The SETRPC-MPO develops and maintains the Public Participation Plan

(PPP), which provides the public an opportunity to contribute ideas and voice opinions on the

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


5

preparation of all transportation plans and programs. As part of developing and/or revising

the TIP, the SETRPC-MPO is required by federal regulations to provide the public with

opportunities to be involved in the planning process. The following activities are outlined in

the PPP for TIP public involvement:

For New TIP Developments:

The new TIP requires a thirty-day public review and comment period.

A formal public meeting is required in each county during the preparation of a new TIP.

For TIP Amendments or Updates:

All TIP amendments and updates require a thirty-day public review and comment period.

Formal public meetings are required when non-exempt projects are added to or deleted

from the TIP.

Title VI

The JOHRTS PPP includes Title VI/Environmental Justice (EJ) principles on providing

opportunities for potentially disadvantaged persons to participate in the planning process. In

addition, the PPP supports Executive Order #13166 (Improving Access to Services for Persons

with Limited English Proficiency). The SETRPC-MPO maintains a Title VI/Environmental Justice

Program and a Limited English Proficiency Plan for the JOHRTS region. The JOHRTS PPP, Title

VI/Environmental Justice Program, and Limited English Proficiency Plan ensure opportunities

to increase communication and dialogue between decision-makers and the public.

Americans with Disabilities Act

The SETRPC-MPO promotes projects and programs that provide quality transportation

services to disabled persons in southeast Texas (for example, paratransit services and

pedestrian improvements). Although funding is not likely to increase between 2017 and 2020,

South East Texas Transit (SETT), the area’s rural transportation system, will strive to

accommodate the increase in demand for its services that may occur.

Beaumont Municipal Transit (BMT) and Port Arthur Transit (PAT) will continue to enhance

their paratransit services. Both BMT and PAT will consider replacing or purchasing paratransit

vehicles upon receiving additional transit funds from the FTA.

Air Quality Standards

In southeast Texas, the petrochemical facilities, power plants, automobiles, and vegetation

produce volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions that

contribute to the formation of ozone, a harmful gas that degrades the quality of the air and

damages the atmosphere. The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act amendments authorized the EPA to

designate areas failing to meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone

as nonattainment for the standard. Although the SETRPC-MPO promotes the development of

transportation projects and programs that reduce VOC and NOx emissions, which decreases

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


6

the formation of ozone, it has previously been classified as nonattainment according to the

standards set forth by the EPA.

Currently, the JOHRTS area is designated as Attainment-Maintenance for the 1997 eight-hour

ozone NAAQS and Attainment/Unclassifiable for the 2008 eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The

JOHRTS area was designated as Attainment-Maintenance for the 1997 eight-hour ozone

standard in November 2010. In July 2013, EPA revoked the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard

for transportation conformity purposes, making the JOHRTS area no longer subject to

transportation conformity requirements. In May 2012, the EPA published final designations

for the 2008 eight-hour ozone NAAQS, and the JOHRTS area was designated

Attainment/Unclassifiable. In October 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency

promulgated a new ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Designations

with the new NAAQS will occur at the end of 2017.

TIP PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS

Project Sources

The project selection process for the TIP is considered a subset of the JOHRTS Project

Selection Process, which is a coordinated effort between the SETRPC-MPO and regional

entities to identify and prioritize projects during each four-year MTP cycle. Projects included

in the TIP are selected from the following sources:

From last two fiscal years’ projects of the previous TIP

Projects that have not let for construction can also be advanced from earlier fiscal years

of the previous TIP

Projects from the financially constrained component of the MTP

From the Texas Department of Transportation’s (TxDOT) ten-year Unified Transportation

Program (UTP), including environmental and feasibility studies

Additional projects from local governments, transit agencies, and other member agencies

Selection Criteria

All selected projects must satisfy the following criteria:

Be consistent with the JOHRTS area long-range goals as defined in the current MTP

Have a committed match-funding source and cost estimate by the project sponsor

Federal and state-funded projects must be located on a TxDOT / FHWA approved

functional classification system

Submittal Content

Projects that are selected during a TIP update or through quarterly revisions need to include

the following information:

MPO Project ID (identification) number

Control-Section-Job (CSJ) number

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


7

Project name / location and limits

Brief description of project

Funding category and number

Project costs (includes federal, state, and local contribution funds)

[Also list federal and state funds that are apportioned by different funding sources]

Let and Revision dates

Project phase (if available)

Amendments

TIP revisions are typically conducted on a quarterly basis. Examples of changes that require a

TIP revision include:

Adding federally funded projects

Adding regionally significant state or local funded projects

Changing the estimated cost of a project that results in a 50% increase in cost and a cost

that exceeds $1.5 million

Changes to project limits or scope of work for federally funded projects

Changing the funding sources for a project from non-federal to federal funds

Examples of changes that do not require a TIP revision include:

Changes to project identification numbers (such as Control-Section-Job (CSJ) numbers)

Updating the project’s let date

Change in the estimated cost of a project that does one, but not both, of the following: a)

exceeds 50% and b) results in a cost exceeding $1.5 million

Splitting or combining projects without modification to original project design concept

and scope

Modifying the project cost estimate without altering the limits or scope

Moving a project from one federal funding category to another

Moving a project from one state funding category to another

Changing a project’s funding source from federal to state funding

Changes to projects within the “grouped” category

PROJECT LISTING INFORMATION This section explains the attributes for the information provided in the project listing.

Control-Section-Job Number

A project identification number assigned by TxDOT for projects included in the UTP or their

Project Development Program.

MPO ID Number

The MPO’s assigned project identification number for the database tracking of all

transportation projects listed in the JOHRTS MTP and TIP. The following information provides

a description of the Project ID numbers (with the first five digits as a constant identifier for

project tracking, while the last four digits may be modified during the PSP).

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


8

Columns 1 & 2 (94026-F15E) list the last two digits of the year a project was first submitted

into the MTP Project Selection Process.

Columns 3, 4, & 5 (94026-F15E) represent a sequential number assigned during the submittal

year (number assigned to the project from the MPO’s key list).

Column 6 (94026-F15E) identifies the primary funding source of the project: Federal [F], State

[S], Local [L], and Transit [T].

Columns 7 and 8 (94026-F15E) identify the network year for the projected completion of the

project.

Column 9 (94026-F15E) signifies whether the project is exempt [E], non-exempt [N], or in the

planning stage [P].

Exceptions in MPO ID Number annotation:

Feasibility Study – A feasibility study may be conducted prior to actually identifying a

specific project; these work efforts are coded as ‘FEA’ in Columns 6, 7, and 8. There is no

network year assigned to a feasibility study.

Environmental Study – An environmental study is a project that is undergoing

preliminary engineering and environmental analysis consistent with early project

development; these work efforts are coded as ‘NEA’ in Columns 6, 7, and 8. There is no

network year assigned to an environmental study.

Right-of-Way – The right-of-way project development phase involves the acquisition of

land to accommodate a proposed improvement. This phase follows environmental study

and precedes construction. This work effort is coded as ‘ROW’ in Columns 6, 7, and 8.

There is no network year assigned to this project type.

Exempt Projects - Exempt projects are not typically modeled and are coded as ‘XX’ in

Columns 7 and 8 as there is no network assignment. An exempt project, such as adding a

continuous left turn lane, can be coded in the travel demand model; therefore, this type

of project may have a network year assigned. Exempt projects must meet the criteria

listed in Appendix B.

Projects beyond MTP plan year – These projects consist of two types. One type are

those projects for which funding is identified to be available during the MTP plan period

but that will not be operational within the plan period. The second type are projects

included in the Unconstrained Component list of the MTP.

1. Projects with identified funding that are not expected to be operational during the

MTP plan period do not have a network year assignment. Columns 7 and 8 are

marked as ‘NN’.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


9

2. Projects in the Unconstrained Component have ‘UNC’ entered in Columns 6, 7,

and 8.

Funding Category

Refer to Appendix A for a description of the funding categories used to classify federal and

state funding of transportation projects and programs.

Revision Date

The Revision Date marks when a project or program is adopted into the state’s short-range

implementation plan.

Phase

Describes the current development phase(s) of a transportation project or program:

Preliminary Engineering [E], Right of Way Acquisition [R], Construction [C], and Transfer [T].

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION

____________________________________________________________JOHRTS FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program

10

PROJECT LISTINGS

FY 2017-2020 Federally Funded Highway Projects

Grouped Projects Federally Funded Transit Projects State Funded Highway Projects

Locally Funded Regionally Significant Projects Right-of-Way Projects

Feasibility Studies

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


11

FEDERALLY FUNDED

HIGHWAY PROJECTS

FY 2017-2020

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


12

BEAUMONT DISTRICT

FY 2017-2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

2017FY

SETRPC METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

FEDERALLY FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS

REMARKS:

DISTRICT COUNTY CSJ HWY PHASE CITY PROJECT SPONSOR YOE COST

BEAUMONT Orange 0028-14-112 IH 10 C TXDOT $4,000,000

LIMITS FROM: UP Railroad

LIMITS TO: 0.54 miles east of FM 3247

DESCRIPTION: Widen existing mainlanes from 4 to 6 lanes

REVISION DATE: 07/2016

MPO PROJECT ID: 15004-F40N

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1, 4

PROJECT HISTORY:

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING: $201,851

ROW PURCHASE: $0

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING: $177,135

CONSTRUCTION COST: $3,822,866

CONTINGENCIES: $7,415

INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST: $4,209,267

1 $1,663,672 $0 $0

FEDERAL STATE LOCALLOCAL

CONTRIBUTION

Authorized Funding by Category/Share:

4 $2,336,328

$0 $4,000,000 $0 $4,000,000$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$1,663,673

$2,336,328

REMARKS: Minute Order – 114027, August 2014


BEAUMONT Jefferson 0739-02-160 IH 10 TXDOT $41,110,380

LIMITS FROM: Chambers Co/L, east

LIMITS TO: Hamshire Rd

DESCRIPTION: Widen freeway from 4 to 6 lanes



FUNDING CATEGORY: 12

PROJECT HISTORY:

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING: $2,014,409

ROW PURCHASE: $0

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING: $1,767,746



INDIRECT COSTS: $1,985,631

BOND FINANCING: $0


12-SP $32,888,304 $8,222,076 $0 $0


CONTRIBUTION


$32,888,304 $8,222,076 $0 $41,110,380$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$41,110,380

PHASE: C=CONSTRUCTION, E = ENGINEERING, R = ROW, T = TRANSFER

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


13

C

BEAUMONT DISTRICT


2017FY





BEAUMONT Jefferson 0739-02-161 IH 10 C TXDOT $61,338,557

LIMITS FROM: Hamshire Rd, east

LIMITS TO: FM 365





PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0





BOND FINANCING: $0


12-SP $49,070,846 $12,267,711 $0 $0


CONTRIBUTION


$49,070,846 $12,267,711 $0 $61,338,557$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$61,338,557

REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Hardin TXDOT $6,862,110

LIMITS FROM:

LIMITS TO:

DESCRIPTION:

0065-06-063 US 69 C

Cooks Lake Rd

Jefferson County Line

Construct Frontage Roads over Pine Island Bayou



FUNDING CATEGORY: 2U, 4

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0


2U $3,125,000 $0


CONTRIBUTION


4 $0 $3,737,110

$0 $6,862,110 $0 $6,862,110$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$6,862,110

$3,575,000


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


14

BEAUMONT DISTRICT


2017FY



REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Jefferson 0065-07-060 US 69 C TXDOT $4,227,796

LIMITS FROM: Hardin County Line

LIMITS TO: Tram Road

DESCRIPTION: Construct Frontage Roads over Pine Island Bayou



FUNDING CATEGORY: 2U, 4

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0


2U $3,125,000


CONTRIBUTION


4 $1,102,796

$0 $4,227,796 $0 $4,227,796$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$4,227,796

$975,000

REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Orange 0028-11-179 IH 10 C TXDOT $10,000,001

LIMITS FROM: FM 1442, east

LIMITS TO: UP Railroad

DESCRIPTION: Widen existing mainlanes from 4 to 6 lanes



FUNDING CATEGORY: 1, 2U

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0


1 $813,203 $0 $0


CONTRIBUTION


2U $9,186,797

$0 $10,000,000 $0 $10,000,000$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$813,204

$9,186,797


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


15

BEAUMONT DISTRICT


2018FY





BEAUMONT Jefferson 0739-02-162 IH 10 C TXDOT $151,000,000

LIMITS FROM: FM 365

LIMITS TO: CR 131 (Walden Rd)





PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0





BOND FINANCING: $0


12-SP $120,800,000 $30,200,000 $0 $0


CONTRIBUTION


$120,800,000 $30,200,000 $0 $151,000,000$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$151,000,000

REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Jefferson 0920-38-178 CS C Beaumont City of Beaumont $5,000,000

LIMITS FROM: Old Dowlen Rd, from SH 105, south

LIMITS TO: Dowlen Rd

DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct existing roadway and add continuous left turn lane


MPO PROJECT ID: 96019-FXXE

FUNDING CATEGORY: 11, 1

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $241,500

BOND FINANCING: $0


DIST DISC-11 $2,976,000 $0 $744,000 $0


CONTRIBUTION


1 $1,024,000 $256,000

$4,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $5,000,000$0FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$3,720,000

$1,280,000


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


16

BEAUMONT DISTRICT


2018FY



REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Jefferson 0786-01-083 FM 364 C TXDOT $1,400,000

LIMITS FROM: 900 ft south of IH 10

LIMITS TO: SH 124

DESCRIPTION: Widen to four lanes with a center left turn lane




PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0


11 $1,120,000 $280,000 $0


CONTRIBUTION


$1,120,000 $280,000 $0 $1,400,000FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$1,400,000

REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Jefferson 0200-11-095 US 69 C Beaumont TXDOT $6,570,000

LIMITS FROM: SH 105, south

LIMITS TO: IH 10

DESCRIPTION: Widen from 4 to 6 lanes



FUNDING CATEGORY: 2

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0


2U $5,256,000 $1,314,000 $0 $0


CONTRIBUTION


$5,256,000 $1,314,000 $0 $6,570,000FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$6,570,000


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


17

GROUPED PROJECTS

STATEWIDE CSJs

FY 2017-2020

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


18

BEAUMONT DISTRICTFY 2017-2020 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

SETRPC METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONGROUPED PROJECTS

FY 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020

DISTRICT COUNTY CSJ HWY PHASE CITY PROJECT SPONSOR EST COST

BEAUMONT VARIOUS 5000-00-950 VARIOUS E VARIOUS TXDOT CONSTRAINED STATEWIDELIMITS FROM: GROUPED PROJECT LIMITS TO:

DESCRIPTION: PE-PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING

REMARKS: SEE APPENDIX C FOR CANDIDATE PROJECT LIST MPO PROJECT ID: 11022-FXXE


BEAUMONT VARIOUS 5000-00-951 VARIOUS R VARIOUS TXDOT CONSTRAINED STATEWIDELIMITS FROM: GROUPED PROJECT LIMITS TO:

DESCRIPTION: RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION



BEAUMONT VARIOUS 5000-00-952 VARIOUS C VARIOUS TXDOT CONSTRAINED STATEWIDELIMITS FROM: GROUPED PROJECT LIMITS TO:

DESCRIPTION: PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION












DESCRIPTION: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION




DESCRIPTION: RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATIONS



DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


19


SETRPC METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONGROUPED PROJECTS

FY 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020



DESCRIPTION: SAFETY




DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPING




DESCRIPTION: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT




DESCRIPTION: BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS




DESCRIPTION: SAFETY REST AREAS AND TRUCK WEIGH STATIONS




DESCRIPTION: TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS



DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


20

FEDERALLY FUNDED

TRANSIT PROJECTS

FY 2017-2020

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


21

FY2017

JOHRTS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project Sponsor BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL TRANSIT

MPO Project Information

(reference number, etc)

14001-TXXE

FTA Apportionment Y 2017

Project Phase

Description OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FY 2017

Sec 5309 ID Number

Amendment Date & Action

General Project Information Funding Information (YOE)

Federal Funding Category 5307

Federal (FTA) Funds $2,000,000

State Funds from TxDOT $400,000

Other Source $2,465,000

Fiscal Year Cost $4,865,000

Trans Dev Credits Requested $0

Trans Dev Credits Awarded

(Date & Amount)

$0

Total Project Cost $4,865,000

Project Sponsor PORT ARTHUR TRANSIT



14003-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number




Federal (FTA) Funds $944,855


Other Source $811,824




(Date & Amount)

$0


Project Sponsor SOUTH EAST TEXAS TRANSIT



14005-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number





State Funds from TxDOT


Fiscal Year Cost $228,526



(Date & Amount)

$0

Total Project Cost $228,526

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


22

FY2017






14007-TXXE


Project Phase

Description ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATION OF A RURAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (2017)

Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


23

FY2018






14002-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0





14004-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0





14006-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


24

FY2018






14008-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


25

FY2019






16001-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0





16002-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0





16003-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


26

FY2019






16006-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


27

FY2020






16007-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0





16008-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0





16009-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


28

FY2020






16010-TXXE


Project Phase


Sec 5309 ID Number










(Date & Amount)

$0


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


29

STATE FUNDED

HIGHWAY PROJECTS

FY 2017-2020

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


30


2017FY

SETRPC METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONSTATE FUNDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS

REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Orange 0920-30-083 CR C $509,495

LIMITS FROM: On Old Hwy 90 from EB IH-10 FR

LIMITS TO: KCS RR

DESCRIPTION: Widen existing roadway


MPO PROJECT ID: 16004-S40N

FUNDING CATEGORY: 3

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0


CONSTRUCTION COST: $483,213


INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST: $546,003

3 $458,545 $50,950


CONTRIBUTION


$458,545 $50,950 $509,495FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$509,495

REMARKS:


BEAUMONT Jefferson 0920-38-257 CS C $1,250,000

LIMITS FROM: Houston Avenue

LIMITS TO: Port of Port Arthur Entrance

DESCRIPTION: Widen existing roadway


MPO PROJECT ID: 16005-S40N

FUNDING CATEGORY: 3

PROJECT HISTORY:


ROW PURCHASE: $0




INDIRECT COSTS: $0

BOND FINANCING: $0


3 $737,500 $512,500


CONTRIBUTION


$737,500 $512,500 $1,250,000FUNDING BY SHARE:

FUNDING BY CATEGORY

$1,250,000


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


31

LOCALLY FUNDED

REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT

PROJECTS

FY 2017-2020

For informational purposes only. DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


32

BEAUMONT DISTRICT


DISTRICT COUNTY CSJ HWY PHASE MPO PROJECT NUMBER


LOCALLY FUNDED PROJECTS

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0920-38-189 CS ROW 02001-ROWP

LIMITS FROM: DOWLEN ROAD FROM US 90, SOUTH LIMITS TO: WALDEN RD

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT A FOUR LANE STREET

REMARKS: Includes MPO ID Number 06001/CSJ 0920-38-190 (Limits from Port Arthur Freshwater Canal to Walden Road) and Phase I of MPO ID Number 02001/CSJ 0920-38-189 (Limits US 90 to Jane's Gully)

BEAUMONT CS ROW 96016-ROWP

LIMITS FROM:

JEFFERSON 0920-38-187

WASHINGTON BOULEVARD AT GUINN AVE LIMITS TO: LANGHAM

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT A FOUR LANE STREET WITH CLT

REMARKS:

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


33

RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECTS

FY 2017-2020

For informational purposes only.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


34

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECTS


LIMITS FROM: OLD DOWLEN ROAD, FROM SH 105 SOUTH LIMITS TO: DOWLEN ROAD IN BEAUMONT

DESCRIPTION: RECONSTRUCT EXISTING ROADWAY AND ADD CONTINOUS LEFT TURN LANE

REMARKS: PHASE I

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0710-03-001 FM 299 94155-ROWP

LIMITS FROM: SOUTH OF WALDEN RD AND FM 105 LIMITS TO: CORNER RD AND FM 105DESCRIPTION: FM 299 [VIDOR RELIEF ROUTE]. CONSTRUCT TWO-LANE RURAL ROADWAY

REMARKS:


LIMITS FROM: DOWLEN ROAD FROM US 90, SOUTH LIMITS TO: WALDEN RD



BEAUMONT CS ROW 96016-ROWP

LIMITS FROM:

JEFFERSON 0920-38-187

WASHINGTON BOULEVARD AT GUINN AVE LIMITS TO: LANGHAM


REMARKS:

ROW

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


35

FEASIBILITY STUDIES

FY 2017-2020

For informational purposes only.

No projects included.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


36

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

FY 2017-2020

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


37

Cate

gory

Des

crip

tion

Prog

ram

med

Auth

oriz

edPr

ogra

mm

edAu

thor

ized

Prog

ram

med

Auth

oriz

edPr

ogra

mm

edAu

thor

ized

Prog

ram

med

Auth

oriz

ed

1Pr

even

tive

Mai

nten

ance

and

Reh

abili

tatio

n$2

,476

,875

$2,4

76,8

75$1

,280

,000

$1,2

80,0

00$0

$0$0

$0$3

,756

,875

$3,7

56,8

75

2M o

r 2U

Urba

n Ar

ea (N

on- T

MA)

Corr

idor

Pro

ject

s$1

5,43

6,79

7$1

5,43

6,79

7$6

,570

,000

$6,5

70,0

00$0

$0$0

$0$2

2,00

6,79

7$2

2,00

6,79

7

3N

on-T

radi

tiona

lly F

unde

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Proj

ect

$1,7

59,4

95$1

,759

,495

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$1,7

59,4

95$1

,759

,495

4St

atew

ide

Con

nect

ivity

Corr

idor

Pro

ject

s$7

,176

,234

$7,1

76,2

34$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$7

,176

,234

$7,1

76,2

34

5CM

AQ$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

5 Fl

exM

ap21

Fle

x$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

6St

ruct

ures

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

7M

etro

Mob

ility

& R

ehab

$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

8Sa

fety

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

9Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Enha

ncem

ents

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

9 Fl

exTA

P$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

10Su

pple

men

tal

Tran

spor

tatio

n $0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

10 C

BICo

rrid

or B

orde

r $0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

11D

istri

ct D

iscr

etio

nary

$0$0

$5,1

20,0

00$5

,120

,000

$0$0

$0$0

$5,1

20,0

00$5

,120

,000

12St

rate

gic

Prio

rity

$102

,448

,937

$102

,448

,937

$151

,000

,000

$151

,000

,000

$0$0

$0$0

$253

,448

,937

$253

,448

,937

12C

Stra

tegi

c P

riorit

y RE

CON

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

12S

Stra

tegi

c P

riorit

y RE

CON

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

SBPE

Stra

tegy

Bud

get P

E$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

SB 1

02St

rate

gy 1

02$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

Tota

l$1

29,2

98,3

38$1

29,2

98,3

38$1

63,9

70,0

00$1

63,9

70,0

00$0

$0$0

$0$2

93,2

68,3

38$2

93,2

68,3

38

FY 2

017

FY 2

018

FY 2

019

FY 2

020

Tota

l$8

1,95

9,15

0$1

31,1

76,0

00$0

$0$2

13,1

35,1

50

$46,

775,

738

$31,

794,

000

$0$0

$78,

569,

738

$563

,450

$1,0

00,0

00$0

$0$1

,563

,450

$0$0

$0$0

$0

CAT

3 - P

rop

1$0

$0$0

$0$0

CAT

3- P

rop

7$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

CAT

3 - V

ehic

al R

egis

tratio

n Fe

es -

VTR

$0$0

$0$0

$0

CAT

3 - R

TR$0

$0$0

$0$0

CAT

3 - S

H 12

1 To

ll Re

venu

e$0

$0$0

$0$0

CAT

3 - S

H 16

1 To

ll Re

venu

e$0

$0$0

$0$0

CAT

3 - S

H 13

0 Co

nces

sion

Rev

enue

$0$0

$0$0

$0

CAT

3 - P

TF$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

CAT

3 - T

DC

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$0$0

$0$0

$0

$129

,298

,338

$163

,970

,000

$0$0

$293

,268

,338

Fede

ral

Stat

e

CAT

3 - L

ocal

Con

tribu

tions

(LC)

Fund

ing

Part

icip

atio

n So

urce

Othe

r - S

trage

gy 1

02 B

udge

t

Sour

ce

Loca

l Mat

ch

Tota

l

CAT

3 - P

rop

12

CAT

3 - P

rop

14 B

onds

CAT

3 - U

niqu

e Fe

dera

l Pro

gram

- Ti

ger I

I

Othe

r - S

ectio

n 53

06Ot

her -

Stra

tegy

PE

Budg

et

CAT

3 - T

exas

Mob

ility

Fun

d

SETR

PC M

etro

polit

ian

Plan

ning

Org

aniz

atio

nIn

itial

FY

2017

- 20

20 T

rans

port

atio

n Im

prov

emen

t Pro

gram

Fu

ndin

g by

Cat

egor

y

FY

201

7FY

201

8FY

201

9FY

202

0To

tal F

Y 20

17 -

2020

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


38

All F

igur

es in

Yea

r of E

xpen

ditu

re (Y

OE) D

olla

rsFY

201

7FY

201

8FY

201

9Fe

dera

lM

atch

Tota

lFe

dera

lM

atch

Tota

lFe

dera

lM

atch

Tota

l1

Sec.

530

7 - U

rban

ized

For

mul

a >2

00K

$2,9

44,8

55$3

,996

,384

$6,9

41,2

39$3

,044

,855

$3,9

46,3

84$6

,991

,239

$3,0

54,8

55$3

,986

,384

$7,0

41,2

392

Sec.

530

7 - U

rban

ized

For

mul

a <2

00K

$0$0

$03

Sec.

530

9 - F

ixed

Gui

dew

ay In

vest

men

t$0

$0$0

4Se

c. 5

337

- Sta

te o

f Goo

d Re

pair

$0$0

$05

Sec.

533

9 - B

us &

Bus

Fac

ilitie

s >2

00k

$0$0

$06

Sec.

531

0-Se

nior

s&Pe

ople

w/D

isab

ilitie

s >2

00k

$0$0

$07

Sec.

531

6 - J

ARC

>200

K$0

$0$0

8Se

c. 5

317

- New

Fre

edom

>20

0K$0

$0$0

9Se

c. 5

310-

Seni

ors&

Peop

le w

/Dis

abili

ties

<200

k$1

82,8

21$4

5,70

5$2

28,5

26$1

82,8

21$4

5,70

5$2

28,5

26$1

82,8

21$4

5,70

5$2

28,5

2610

Sec.

531

1$5

02,1

53$6

27,4

84$1

,129

,637

$502

,153

$627

,484

$1,1

29,6

37$5

02,1

53$6

27,4

84$1

,129

,637

10Re

gion

ally

Sign

ifica

nt o

r Oth

er

(incl

FHW

A tra

nsfe

rs)

$0$0

$0$3

,629

,829

$4,6

69,5

73$8

,299

,402

$3,7

29,8

29$4

,619

,573

$8,3

49,4

02$3

,739

,829

$4,6

59,5

73$8

,399

,402

Re

ques

ted

$0$0

$0

Awar

ded

$0$0

$0

FY 2

020

Tota

lFe

dera

lM

atch

Tota

lFe

dera

lM

atch

Tota

l1

Sec.

530

7 - U

rban

ized

For

mul

a >2

00K

$3,0

64,8

55$4

,011

,384

$7,0

76,2

39$1

2,10

9,42

0$1

5,94

0,53

6$2

8,04

9,95

62

Sec.

530

7 - U

rban

ized

For

mul

a <2

00K

$0$0

$0$0

3Se

c. 5

309

- Fix

ed G

uide

way

Inve

stm

ent

$0$0

$0$0

4Se

c. 5

337

- Sta

te o

f Goo

d Re

pair

$0$0

$0$0

5Se

c. 5

339

- Bus

& B

us F

acili

ties

>200

k$0

$0$0

$06

Sec.

531

0-Se

nior

s&Pe

ople

w/D

isab

ilitie

s >2

00k

$0$0

$0$0

7Se

c. 5

316

- JAR

C >2

00K

$0$0

$0$0

8Se

c. 5

317

- New

Fre

edom

>20

0K$0

$0$0

$09

Sec.

531

0-Se

nior

s&Pe

ople

w/D

isab

ilitie

s <2

00k

$182

,821

$45,

705

$228

,526

$731

,284

$182

,820

$914

,104

10Se

c. 5

311

$502

,153

$627

,484

$1,1

29,6

37$2

,008

,612

$2,5

09,9

36$4

,518

,548

10Re

gion

ally

Sign

ifica

nt o

r Oth

er

(incl

FHW

A tra

nsfe

rs)

$0$0

$0$0

$3,7

49,8

29$4

,684

,573

$8,4

34,4

02$1

4,84

9,31

6$1

8,63

3,29

2$3

3,48

2,60

8

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

evel

opm

ent C

redi

ts

Requ

este

d$0

$0

Awar

ded

$0$0

Tota

l Fu

nds

Tran

sit P

rogr

ams

SETR

PC M

etro

polit

an P

lann

ing

Org

aniz

atio

n

Initi

al F

Y 20

17 -

2020

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am

Tran

sit P

rogr

am

All F

igur

es in

Yea

r of E

xpen

ditu

re (Y

OE) D

olla

rs

Tota

l Fu

nds

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

evel

opm

ent C

redi

ts

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


39

APPENDIX A FUNDING CATEGORIES

This appendix includes a list and brief description of each category for transportation projects and programs used by the Texas Department of Transportation for distributing

funds. These categories comply with federal transportation legislation to ensure that federal funds are applied to eligible projects.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


A-1

FUNDING CATEGORIES

Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Funding Categories:

1 Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation and preventative maintenance of the existing state highway system, including the Interstate Highway System main lanes, frontage roads, structures, signs, pavement markings, striping, etc.

2 Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects: Mobility and added capacity projects along a corridor that improve transportation facilities in order to decrease travel time and level or duration of traffic congestion and increase the safe and efficient movement of people and freight in metropolitan and urbanized areas.

3 Non-Traditionally Funded Transportation Projects: Transportation related projects that qualify for funding from sources not traditionally part of the state highway fund, including state bond financing under programs such as proposition 12, pass-through toll financing, unique federal funding, regional toll revenue, and local participation funding.

4 Statewide Connectivity Corridor Projects: Mobility and added capacity projects on major state highway systems corridors which provide statewide connectivity between urban areas and corridors.

5 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement: Addresses attainment of national ambient air quality standards in current non-attainment areas. Funds cannot be utilized to add capacity for single occupancy vehicles.

6 Structures-Replacement & Rehabilitation: Replaces or rehabilitates eligible bridges on and off the state highway system. Eliminates at-grade highway/railroad crossings by providing grade separations and rehabilitates/replaces deficient railroad underpasses.

7 Metropolitan Mobility & Rehabilitation: Addresses various transportation needs within Transportation Management Areas selected by the Metropolitan Planning Organizations.

8 Safety: Addresses safety related projects on and off the state highway system. Includes safety improvements to high risk rural roads, projects selected via safety indices to eliminate hazards, and signal coordination and warning devices at railroad crossings.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


A-2

9 Enhancements: Includes projects above and beyond typical transportation improvements, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle pedestrian facilities, landscaping, historic preservation, environmental mitigation, and safety rest areas.

10 Miscellaneous (Supplemental Transportation Projects): Various projects including construction and rehabilitation of roadways within and adjacent to state parks and wildlife refuges; landscaping development projects; replacement of rough railroad crossing surfaces, maintenance of automatic railroad devices, and rehabilitation and/or improvement of railroad infrastructure; and construction or replacement of curb ramps at on-system intersections.

11 District Discretionary: Various projects on the state highway system selected at the district’s discretion.

12 Strategic Priority: Commission-selected projects that promote economic opportunity, increase efficiency on military deployment routes, maintain the ability to respond to both man-made and natural emergencies, and address other various strategic needs.

Federal Transit Administration Funding Categories:

FTA 5307 Federal grant funds for transit projects in urbanized areas with a population of 50,000 or more persons.

FTA 5310 Federal grant funds available to regional transit agencies to provide transportation services to the elderly and disabled (paratransit service).

FTA 5311 State transit funds provided to rural transit providers for the purpose of supporting public transportation in rural areas with population of less than 50,000.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


A-3

APPENDIX B EXEMPT PROJECT CRITERIA

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


B-1

EXEMPT PROJECT CRITERIA

This attachment provides information excerpted from 40 CFR Part 93: Transportation Conformity Rule regarding project and program types that are considered exempt from being submitted as part of a transportation conformity determination analysis. The following criteria describe the exemption status for these types of projects and programs.

§93.126 Exempt Projects

Notwithstanding the other requirements of this subpart, highway and transit projects of the types listed in Table 2 are exempt from the requirement that a conformity determination be made. Such projects may proceed toward implementation even in the absence of a conforming transportation plan and TIP. A particular action of the type listed in Table 2 is not exempt if the MPO in consultation with other agencies (see §93.105(c)(1)(iii)), the EPA, and the FHWA (in the case of a highway project) or the FTA (in case of a transit project) concur that it has potentially adverse emissions impacts for any reason. States and MPOs must ensure that exempt projects do not interfere with TCM implementation.

Table 2. Exempt Projects

SAFETY Railroad/highway crossing Hazard elimination program Safer non-Federal-aid system roads Shoulder improvements Increasing sight distance Safety improvement program Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects Railroad/highway crossing warning devices Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Pavement marking demonstration Emergency relief (23 U.S.C.125) Fencing Skid treatments Safety roadside rest areas Adding medians Truck climbing lanes outside the urbanized area Lighting improvements Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing bridges (no additional travel lanes) Emergency truck pullovers

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


B-2

MASS TRANSIT Operating assistance to transit agencies Purchase of support vehicles Rehabilitation of transit vehicles1

Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing facilities Purchase of operating equipment for vehicles (e.g., radios, fireboxes, lifts, etc.) Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems Construction of small passenger shelters and information kiosks Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures (e.g., rail or bus buildings,

storage and maintenance facilities, stations, terminals, and ancillary structures) Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and tracked in existing rights-of-

way Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of

the fleet1

Construction of new bus or rail storage/maintenance facilities categorically excluded in 23 CFR 771

AIR QUALITY Continuation of ride-sharing and vanpooling promotion activities at current levels Bicycle and pedestrian facilities

OTHER Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as:

Planning and technical studies Grants for training and research programs Planning activities conducted pursuant to titles 23 and 49 U.S.C. Federal-aid systems revisions

Engineering to assess social, economic, and environmental effects of the proposed action or alternatives to the action

Noise attenuation Advance land acquisition (23 CFR 712 or 23 CFR 771) Acquisition of scenic easements Plantings, landscaping, etc. Sign removal Directional and informational signs Transportation enhancement activities (except rehabilitation and operation of historic

transportation buildings, structures, or facilities) Repair of damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, except projects

involving substantial functional, locational or capacity changes

1In PM10 nonattainment or maintenance areas, such projects are exempt only if they are in compliance with control measures in the applicable implementation plan.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


B-3

§93.127 Projects Exempt from Regional Emissions Analysis

Notwithstanding the other requirements of this subpart, highway and transit projects of the types listed in Table 3 are exempt from regional emissions analysis requirements. The local effects of these projects with respect to CO or PM10 concentrations must be considered to determine if a hot-spot analysis is required prior to making a project-level conformity determination. Such projects may then proceed to the project development process even in the absence of a conforming transportation plan and TIP. A particular action of the type listed in Table 3 is not exempt if the MPO in consultation with other agencies (see §93.105(c)(1)(iii)), the EPA, and the FHWA (in the case of a highway project) or the FTA (incase of a transit project) concur that it has potential regional impacts for any reason.

Table 3. Projects Exempt from Regional Emissions Analysis

Intersection channelization projects Intersection signalization projects at individual intersections Interchange reconfiguration projects Changes in vertical and horizontal alignments Truck size and weight inspection stations Bus terminals and transfer points

§93.128 Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects

Traffic signal synchronization projects may be approved, funded, and implemented without satisfying the requirements of this subpart. However, all subsequent regional emissions analyses required by §93.118 and §93.119 for all transportation plans, TIPs, or projects not from a conforming plan and TIP must include such regionally significant traffic signal synchronization projects.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


B-4

APPENDIX C GROUPED PROJECT CHART AND

GROUPED CANDIDATE PROJECT LISTING This appendix provides a list of individual projects/programs considered to be of

inappropriate scale for individual listing in a given program year and is provided for informational purposes. Additional projects/programs may be identified that are not currently listed. Grouping allows efficient programming and reduces the need for

revisions to the TIP. No added capacity type projects or phases of added capacity type projects are included.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-1

GRO

UPED PR

OJECT

CSJs

Defin

ition

of G

roup

ed Projects for use in

the STIP

Revised Au

gust 4, 201

5

PRO

POSE

D

CSJ

GR

OU

PED

PR

OJE

CTCA

TEG

OR

Y

50

00

-00

-95

0PE

-Pre

limin

ary

Engi

neer

ing

50

00

-00

-95

1R

ight

of W

ay A

cqui

stio

n

50

00

-00

-95

2

50

00

-00

-95

7

50

00

-00

-95

8

50

00

-00

-95

3B

ridge

Rep

lace

men

t and

R

ehab

ilita

tion

50

00

-00

-95

4R

ailro

ad G

rade

Sep

arat

ions

58

00

-00

-95

0Sa

fety

DEF

INIT

ION

Prel

imin

ary

Engi

neer

ing

for a

ny p

roje

ct e

xcep

t add

ed c

apac

ity p

roje

cts

in a

non

atta

inm

ent a

rea.

In

clud

es a

ctiv

ities

whi

ch d

o no

t inv

olve

or l

ead

dire

ctly

to c

onst

ruct

ion,

suc

h as

pla

nnin

g an

d re

sear

ch a

ctiv

ities

; gra

nts

for t

rain

ing;

eng

inee

ring

to d

efin

e th

e el

emen

ts o

f a p

ropo

sed

actio

n or

al

tern

ativ

es s

o th

at s

ocia

l, ec

onom

ic, a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal e

ffec

ts c

an b

e as

sess

ed.

Rig

ht o

f Way

acq

uisi

tion

for a

ny p

roje

ct e

xcep

t add

ed c

apac

ity p

roje

cts

in a

non

atta

inm

ent a

rea.

In

clud

es re

loca

tion

assi

stan

ce, h

ards

hip

acqu

isiti

on a

nd p

rote

ctiv

e bu

ying

.

Proj

ects

to in

clud

e pa

vem

ent r

epai

r to

pres

erve

exi

stin

g pa

vem

ent s

o th

at it

may

ach

ieve

its

desi

gned

load

ing.

Incl

udes

sea

l coa

ts, o

verla

ys, r

esur

faci

ng, r

esto

ratio

nan

d re

habi

litat

ion

done

with

exi

stin

g R

OW

. Als

o in

clud

es m

oder

niza

tion

of a

high

way

by

reco

nstr

uctio

n, a

ddin

g sh

ould

ers

or a

ddin

g au

xilia

ry la

nes

(e.g

., pa

rkin

g, w

eavi

ng,

turn

ing,

clim

bing

, non

-add

ed c

apac

ity) o

r dra

inag

e im

prov

emen

ts a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith re

habi

litat

ion.

Proj

ects

to re

plac

e an

d/or

reha

bilit

ate

func

tiona

lly o

bsol

ete

or s

truc

tura

lly d

efic

ient

brid

ges.

Proj

ects

to in

clud

e th

e co

nstr

uctio

n or

repl

acem

ent/

reha

bilit

atio

n of

gua

rd ra

ils,

med

ian

barr

iers

, cra

sh c

ushi

ons,

pav

emen

t mar

king

s, s

kid

trea

tmen

ts, m

edia

ns,

light

ing

impr

ovem

ents

, hig

hway

sig

ns, c

urb

ram

ps, r

ailro

ad/h

ighw

ay c

ross

ing

war

ning

dev

ices

, fe

ncin

g, in

ters

ectio

n im

prov

emen

ts (e

.g.,

turn

lane

s), s

igna

lizat

ion

proj

ects

and

inte

rcha

nge

mod

ifica

tions

. Als

o in

clud

es p

roje

cts

fund

ed v

ia th

e Fe

dera

l Haz

ard

Elim

inat

ion

Prog

ram

, Fed

eral

Rai

lroad

Sig

nal S

afet

y Pr

ogra

m, o

r Acc

ess

Man

agem

ents

pro

ject

s, e

xcep

t tho

se

that

resu

lt in

add

ed c

apac

ity.

Prev

entiv

e M

aint

enan

ce a

nd

Reh

abili

tatio

n

Proj

ects

to c

onst

ruct

or r

epla

ce e

xist

ing

high

way

-railr

oad

grad

e cr

ossi

ngs

and

tore

habi

litat

e an

d/or

repl

ace

defic

ient

railr

oad

unde

rpas

ses,

resu

lting

in n

o ad

ded

capa

city

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-2

GRO

UPED PR

OJECT

CSJs

Defin

ition

of G

roup

ed Projects for use in

the STIP

Revised Au

gust 4, 201

5

PRO

POSE

D

CSJ

GR

OU

PED

PR

OJE

CTCA

TEG

OR

YD

EFIN

ITIO

N

50

00

-00

-95

6La

ndsc

apin

g

58

00

-00

-91

5In

telli

gent

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Syst

em

Dep

loym

ent

50

00

-00

-91

6B

icyc

le a

nd P

edes

tria

n

50

00

-00

-91

7Sa

fety

Res

t Are

as a

nd T

ruck

Wei

gh

Stat

ions

50

00

-00

-91

8Tr

ansi

t Im

prov

emen

ts a

nd P

rogr

ams

Not

e 2

: Pr

ojec

ts fu

nded

as

part

of t

he R

ecre

atio

nal T

rails

Pro

gram

(RTP

) con

sist

ent w

ith th

e re

vise

d gr

oupe

d pr

ojec

t cat

egor

y de

finiti

ons

may

be

grou

ped.

R

TP p

roje

cts

that

are

not

con

sist

ent w

ith th

e re

vise

d gr

oupe

d pr

ojec

t cat

egor

y de

finiti

ons

mus

t be

indi

vidu

ally

not

ed in

the

Tran

spor

tatio

n Im

prov

emen

t Pr

ogra

m (T

IP) a

nd S

tate

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (S

TIP)

.

Proj

ects

incl

ude

the

cons

truc

tion

and

impr

ovem

ent o

f sm

all p

asse

nger

she

lters

and

info

rmat

ion

kios

ks. A

lso

incl

udes

the

cons

truc

tion

and

impr

ovem

ent o

f rai

lst

orag

e/m

aint

enan

ce fa

cilit

ies

bus

tran

sfer

faci

litie

s w

here

min

or a

mou

nts

ofad

ditio

nal l

and

are

requ

ired

and

ther

e is

not

a s

ubst

antia

l inc

reas

e in

the

num

ber o

f use

rs. A

lso

incl

udes

tran

sit o

pera

ting

assi

stan

ce, a

cqui

sitio

n of

third

-par

ty tr

ansi

t ser

vice

s, a

nd tr

ansi

t m

arke

ting,

and

mob

ility

man

agem

ent/

coor

dina

tion.

Not

e 1

: Pro

ject

s fu

nded

with

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Alte

rnat

ives

Pro

gram

(TAP

), Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Enha

ncem

ent,

and

Cong

estio

n M

itiga

tion

Air Q

ualit

y fu

ndin

g re

quire

a

Fede

ral e

ligib

ility

det

erm

inat

ion,

and

are

not

app

rove

d to

be

grou

ped.

Proj

ect c

onsi

stin

g of

typi

cal r

ight

-of-w

ay la

ndsc

ape

deve

lopm

ent,

esta

blis

hmen

tan

d ae

sthe

tic im

prov

emen

ts to

incl

ude

any

asso

ciat

ed e

rosi

on c

ontr

ol a

nden

viro

nmen

tal m

itiga

tion

activ

ities

.H

ighw

ay tr

affic

ope

ratio

n im

prov

emen

t pro

ject

s in

clud

ing

the

inst

alla

tion

of ra

mp

met

erin

g co

ntro

l dev

ices

, var

iabl

e m

essa

ge s

igns

, tra

ffic

mon

itorin

g eq

uipm

ent

and

proj

ects

in th

e Fe

dera

l ITS

/IVH

S pr

ogra

ms.

Cons

truc

tion

or re

habi

litat

ion

of b

icyc

le a

nd p

edes

tria

n la

nes,

pat

hs a

nd fa

cilit

ies.

Cons

truc

tion

and

impr

ovem

ent o

f res

t are

as, a

nd tr

uck

wei

gh s

tatio

ns.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-3


C-3

BEAUMONT DISTRICT



CANDIDATE PROJECT LISTING

FY 2017

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0920-00-921 VA C

LIMITS FROM: DISTRICTWIDE

LIMITS TO: -

DESCRIPTION: FY 17 SEAL COAT PLACEHOLDER CSJ

$7,700,000

FEDERAL SHARE: $6,160,000

STATE SHARE: $1,540,000

LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1

DISTRICT COUNTY CSJ HWY CITY PHASE MPO PROJECT NUMBER TOTAL FUNDING

10/2016

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0508-04-166 SH 73 C

LIMITS FROM: US 69, EAST

LIMITS TO: SH 87

DESCRIPTION: MILL AND OVERLAY EXISTING ROADWAY

$5,000,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


12/2016


LIMITS FROM: SH 87

LIMITS TO: 0.200 MILES EAST OF FM 366


$365,000

FEDERAL SHARE: $292,000

STATE SHARE: $73,000

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


12/2016

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0065-07-059 US 69 C

LIMITS FROM: 0.2 MI S OF TRAM ROAD, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: LNVA CANAL

DESCRIPTION: RESURFACE ROADWAY

$1,000,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2017

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0028-15-054 BU 90-Y C

LIMITS FROM: IH-10, EAST

LIMITS TO: SH 87


$1,411,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2017

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0305-07-063 SH 87 C

LIMITS FROM: IH-10, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: BU 90-Y

DESCRIPTION: MILL AND INLAY EXISTING ROADWAY

$1,212,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2017


LIMITS FROM: LNVA CANAL, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: IH 10

DESCRIPTION: RESURFACE ROADWAY

$1,000,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2017

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0200-11-099 US 69 BEAUMONT C

LIMITS FROM: LNVA CANAL, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: DELAWARE (FRONTAGE ROADS)

DESCRIPTION: REPAIR EXISTING PAVEMENT AND OVERLAY ROADWAY

$4,407,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2017


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-4

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2017

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0339-04-035 SH 105 C

LIMITS FROM: EAST OF SH 326, EAST

LIMITS TO: JEFFERSON C/L


$3,240,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


05/2017

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0932-02-044 FM 365 C

LIMITS FROM: FM 1406, EAST

LIMITS TO: IH 10

DESCRIPTION: ADD SHOULDERS AND OVERLAY

$4,000,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


06/2017

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0920-30-077 CR C

LIMITS FROM: E ROUND BUNCH ROAD AT COW BAYOU

LIMITS TO: (STR AA2690006)

DESCRIPTION: REHAB BRIDGE AND APPROACHES

$13,252,460



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2016

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0920-30-079 CS C

LIMITS FROM: OLD HWY 90 AT ANDERSON GULLY

LIMITS TO: (STR C01835002)

DESCRIPTION: REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES

$390,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2017

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0920-03-034 CR C, PE

LIMITS FROM: ON CR 338 AT VILLAGE CREEK

LIMITS TO: -

DESCRIPTION: REPLACE BRIDGE

$340,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2017

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0920-38-256 CS C

LIMITS FROM: LAUREL AVENUE AT DRAINAGE DITCH

LIMITS TO: (STR B006-78-001)


$275,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: 0.076 MI N OF PLANT RD

LIMITS TO: IH 10

DESCRIPTION: TEXTURIZE SHOULDERS (PROFILE PAVEMENT MARKERS)

$150,512



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


11/2016

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0784-01-048 FM 418 C

LIMITS FROM: 0.083 MILES W OF CR 162

LIMITS TO: BU 96F

DESCRIPTION: MILLED CENTERLINE RUMBLE STRIPS

$80,541


STATE SHARE: $8,054

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-5

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2017


LIMITS FROM: FM 1003

LIMITS TO: FM 105E INTERSECTION


$84,121


STATE SHARE: $8,412

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 1075-01-018 SS 93 C

LIMITS FROM: US 69

LIMITS TO: FM 365


$90,580


STATE SHARE: $9,058

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017

BEAUMONT ORANGE 1284-01-075 FM 1130 C

LIMITS FROM: FM 1136

LIMITS TO: ZAVALA ROAD


$38,834


STATE SHARE: $3,883

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


LIMITS FROM: FM 105

LIMITS TO: FM 1442


$29,726


STATE SHARE: $2,973

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


LIMITS FROM: IH 10

LIMITS TO: FM 105


$37,542


STATE SHARE: $3,754

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


LIMITS FROM: 0.630 MI S OF SH 12

LIMITS TO: 0.235 MI N OF IH 10


$38,768


STATE SHARE: $3,877

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


LIMITS FROM: FM 92

LIMITS TO: 0.001 MI S OF OLD ARCO RD


$52,744


STATE SHARE: $5,274

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


LIMITS FROM: 0.292 MI E OF US 69

LIMITS TO: 0.083 MILES W OF CR 162


$14,350


STATE SHARE: $1,435

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-6

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2017


LIMITS FROM: 0.306 MI W OF RANCH RD

LIMITS TO: US 69


$20,357


STATE SHARE: $2,036

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


03/2017


LIMITS FROM: 0.7 MILES NORTH OF FM 1006

LIMITS TO: FM 1006

DESCRIPTION: PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PAVED SURFACE WIDTH

$395,886



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


04/2017


LIMITS FROM: 2.075 MILES EAST OF US 69

LIMITS TO: SILSBEE

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS, HIGH FRICTION SURFACE TREATMENT (CURVE)

$2,045,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: NEWTON CO LINE

LIMITS TO: SH 12

DESCRIPTION: TEXTURIZE SHOULDERS, CENTERLINE TEXTURING

$58,439


STATE SHARE: $5,844

LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: SH 326

LIMITS TO: 4.094 MILES EAST OF SH 326

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT PAVED SHOULDERS (1-4 FT.)

$1,358,126



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: 1.169 MILES EAST OF FM 770

LIMITS TO: 1.07 MILES WEST OF SH 326

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS, TEXTURIZE SHOULDERS

$458,900



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017



LIMITS TO: 0.6 MILES EAST OF FM 787

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS

$410,008



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: FM 1130 SOUTH

LIMITS TO: IH 10


$70,849


STATE SHARE: $7,085

LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-7

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2017


LIMITS FROM: 1.7 MILES EAST OF US 69

LIMITS TO: 2.075 MILES EAST OF US 69

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS, HIGH FRICTION SURFACE TREATMENT (CURVE)

$116,975



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: IH 10, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: SH 87


$119,300



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: 1.07 MILES WEST OF SH 326

LIMITS TO: 1.095 MILES WEST OF JEFFERSON CO LINE

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS, TEXTURIZE SHOULDERS

$263,333



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017



LIMITS TO: 4.1 MILES WEST OF LUMBERTON

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS, HIGH FRICTION SURFACE TREATMENT (CURVE), INCREASE SUPERELEVATION

$2,104,933



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2017


LIMITS FROM: IH-10, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: UPRR

DESCRIPTION: REHABILITATE EXISTING ROADWAY WITH MILL AND INLAY

$2,340,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-



01/2017


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-8

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2018

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0306-01-060 SH 87 ORANGE C

LIMITS FROM: FM 105, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: SH 62

DESCRIPTION: OVERLAY EXISTING ROADWAY

$2,772,840



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2016


LIMITS FROM: NEWTON CO LINE, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: IH 10


$4,055,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


03/2016


LIMITS FROM: .20 MILES N OF FM 364

LIMITS TO: .20 MILES S OF FM 364

DESCRIPTION: INSTALL LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANES

$300,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


09/2017


LIMITS FROM: DISTRICT WIDE

LIMITS TO: .

DESCRIPTION: FY 18 SEAL COAT PLACE HOLDER CSJ

$6,000,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


10/2017


LIMITS FROM: FM 408, EAST

LIMITS TO: SH 73 IN BRIDGE CITY

DESCRIPTION: REHABILITATE EXISTING ROADWAY

$2,500,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


02/2018


LIMITS FROM: AT CALDWOOD CUTOFF

LIMITS TO: (STR 201240002807063)

DESCRIPTION: UPGRADE BRIDGE AND APPROACH RAILING

$83,360



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2018


LIMITS FROM: AT PINCHBACK

LIMITS TO: (STR 201240002807130)


$72,080



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2018


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-9

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2018


LIMITS FROM: AT HILLEBRANDT BAYOU

LIMITS TO: (STR 201240002807044)


$81,600



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2018


LIMITS FROM: AT HILLEBRANDT BAYOU

LIMITS TO: (STR 093201011)


$5,870,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


06/2018


LIMITS FROM: CHAMBERS COUNTY LINE, EAST

LIMITS TO: 0.5 MILES EAST OF SH 124

DESCRIPTION: GRADE SEPARATION & CLOSE CROSSOVER

$9,296,400



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


09/2017


LIMITS FROM: 4.2 MILES N OF FM 3247

LIMITS TO: 1.0 MILES N OF FM 3247

DESCRIPTION: SAFETY TREAT FIXED OBJECTS

$409,670



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


04/2018


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-10

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2019

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0305-07-067 SH 87

LIMITS FROM: AT BU 90Y

LIMITS TO: .

DESCRIPTION: IMPROVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS

$148,234



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY:


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: SH 87, EAST

LIMITS TO: 3,000 FEET EAST OF FM 366 (FRONTAGE ROADS)


$800,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


03/2016

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0065-05-145 US 96 C

LIMITS FROM: VILLAGE CREEK BRIDGE

LIMITS TO: US 69


$4,000,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


04/2018


LIMITS FROM: DISTRICTWIDE

LIMITS TO: -

DESCRIPTION: FY 15 SEAL COAT PLACEHOLDER CSJ

$7,000,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


10/2018


LIMITS FROM: MAIN A CANAL, EAST

LIMITS TO: SH 87 (FRONTAGE ROADS)


$3,000,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


03/2019

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0667-01-115 SH 347 NEDERLAND C

LIMITS FROM: MAIN C LATERAL, SOUTH

LIMITS TO: AVE B IN NEDERLAND

DESCRIPTION: REHABILITATE EXISTING ROADWAY

$5,700,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 1


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: AT PIGNUT GULLY

LIMITS TO: .


$160,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


12/2018

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0920-30-078 CS C

LIMITS FROM: OLD HWY 90 AT BAIRDS BAYOU

LIMITS TO: (STR G00436001)


$2,650,000



LOCAL SHARE: $-

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


01/2019


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-11

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




FY 2019

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0932-01-113 FM 365 D

LIMITS FROM: AT RHODAIR GULLY

LIMITS TO: .

DESCRIPTION: BRIDGE REHABILITATION

$415,000



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: AT NEDERLAND AVE

LIMITS TO: (STR 201240020015139)


$103,020



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: AT THE LNVA CANAL

LIMITS TO: (STR 201240020015126)


$53,992



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: AT AIRPORT ROAD

LIMITS TO: (STR 201240020015136)


$143,480



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 6


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: AT HOGABOOM RD

LIMITS TO: .


$91,071


STATE SHARE: $9,107

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2019

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0200-10-081 US 69 C

LIMITS FROM: AT FM 421

LIMITS TO: .


$105,889



LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2019


LIMITS FROM: AT PARK AVE

LIMITS TO: .


$95,867


STATE SHARE: $9,587

LOCAL SHARE:

FUNDING CATEGORY: 8


05/2019

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0739-02-164 IH 10 C

LIMITS FROM: WALDEN ROAD

LIMITS TO: 0.23 MILES WEST OF US 90


$2,150,000



LOCAL SHARE:



04/2018


DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


C-12

APPENDIX D

PROJECTS UNDERGOING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

This appendix contains a list of projects that will undergo preliminary engineering and environmental analysis (PE/EA) consistent with early project development during the

time frame of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


D-1

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0920-38-178 CS NEPA 96019-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: OLD DOWLEN ROAD, FROM SH 105 SOUTH LIMITS TO: DOWLEN ROAD IN BEAUMONT

DESCRIPTION: 4 LANE FACILITY

REMARKS: PHASE II

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0883-02-068 FM 105 NEPA 11038-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: 3.3 MI S OF IH 10 LIMITS TO: 6.0 MI S OF IH 10

DESCRIPTION: RECONSTRUCT EXISTING ROADWAY ON NEW ALIGNMENT

REMARKS:

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0200-09-069 US 69 NEPA 00016-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: TYLER COUNTY LINE LIMITS TO: 0.75 MILES SOUTH OF FM 1003

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW FOUR-LANE DIVIDED FACILITY

REMARKS:

BEAUMONT HARDIN 0200-10-060 US 69 NEPA 00019-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: 0.75 MILES SOUTH OF FM 1003 LIMITS TO: MITCHELL ROAD

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW FOUR-LANE DIVIDED FACILITY

REMARKS:

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0920-38-XXX CS NEPA 02001-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: DOWLEN ROAD FROM US 90, SOUTH LIMITS TO: WALDEN ROAD



BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0739-02-141 IH 10 NEPA 06005-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: AT US 69 INTERCHANGE (WEST) LIMITS TO: -

DESCRIPTION: RECONSTRUCT INTERCHANGE

REMARKS:


LIMITS FROM: SMITH ROAD LIMITS TO: WALDEN ROAD

DESCRIPTION: WIDEN TO SIX LANES

REMARKS:


LIMITS FROM: FM 365 LIMITS TO: SMITH ROAD


REMARKS:

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0200-11-080 US 69 NEPA 94131-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: IH 10 LIMITS TO: PINE ISLAND BAYOU


REMARKS:

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


D-2

BEAUMONT DISTRICT




ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

BEAUMONT ORANGE 0710-03-001 FM 299 NEPA 94155-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: FM 105 (IN PINE FOREST), SOUTH LIMITS TO: FM 105 (IN VIDOR)

DESCRIPTION: FM 299 [VIDOR RELIEF ROUTE]. CONSTRUCT TWO-LANE RURAL ROADWAY

REMARKS:

BEAUMONT JEFFERSON 0920-38-187 CS NEPA 96016-NEAP

LIMITS FROM: WASHINGTON BOULEVARD FROM 364, EAST LIMITS TO: LANGHAM


REMARKS:

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


D-3

APPENDIX E

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT DOCUMENTATION

This appendix provides a synopsis of the public participation process.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-1

Public Involvement Documentation

In accordance with federal legislation and regulations, and as part of the transportation planning

process, the public was invited to review and comment on the proposed JOHRTS FY 2017-2020

TIP. The SETRPC-MPO made this document available for public review on the SETRPC website

(www.setrpc.org/ter) and at the SETRPC office for a 30-day comment period of April 04, 2016

through May 04, 2016.

The SETRPC-MPO conducted four meetings to allow the public to review and comment on the

proposed JOHRTS FY 2017-2020 TIP. These meetings were held at the following locations:

Jefferson County

Port Arthur Public Library, Port Arthur – Monday, April 11, 2016

South East Texas Regional Planning Commission, Beaumont – Wednesday, April

13, 2016

Orange County

Orange Public Library, Orange – Tuesday April 12, 2016

Hardin County

Lumberton City Hall, Lumberton – Thursday, April 14, 2014

Copies of the notice and the advertisements in local papers are included in this attachment for

informational purposes.

The SETRPC-MPO received one written public comment during the 30-day public comment

Period:

The Texas Department of Transportation requested the addition of one project that was

included in JOHRTS TIP 2015 – 2018. This project was included as the letting date for project

could be during the overlapping period of the two TIP documents. DRAFT

FOR

ADOPTION


E-2

http://www.setrpc.org/ter

www.setrpc.org/ter

Wednesday, April 13 South East Texas Regional Planning

Commission 2210 East Tex Freeway

Beaumont, Texas 77703 3:00 PM

Please join us for a meeting about

Southeast Texas’ Transportation Programs!

Learn about the road, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and safety

projects that are proposed through Year 2040,

how much they will cost, and when they will happen.

Share your opinion on the proposed projects and provide

input on what you want to see in the future.

The public review and comment period will be held

April 04 – May 04, 2016.

The South East Texas Regional Planning Commission –

Metropolitan Planning Organization is responsible for planning

transportation improvements in Hardin, Jefferson, and

Orange Counties, and we hope to hear from you.

Please attend any meeting to provide input or submit

written comments by 5:00 PM, May 04, 2016 to:

Bob Dickinson, 2210 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703.

All comments received will be addressed and provided to the

Transportation Planning Committee for consideration.

For special needs requests, please contact Bob Dickinson at least 48

hours in advance at 409-899-8444 x 7520 or [email protected].

Thursday, April 14 Lumberton City Hall

836 North Main Lumberton, Texas,

77657 3:00 PM

Monday, April 11 City of Port Arthur Public

Library 4615 9th Avenue Port Arthur, Texas

77642 3:00 PM

Tuesday, April 12 City of Orange Public

Library 200 5th Street

Orange, Texas 77631 3:00 PM

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-3

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-4

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-5

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-6

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-7

5/10/2016 Transportation Improvement Program

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=34&Itemid=52 1/1

search...

T&ER Home Transportation Environmental Resources Economic Development Information & Data Get Involved

In this Section

Overview

Transportation PlanningCommittee Meetings

Planning

MetropolitanTransportation Plan

Public Participation Plan

TransportationImprovement Program

Unified Planning WorkProgram

Title VI

Public Transportation

Regional Coordination

South East Texas Transit

Tránsito del Sureste deTexas

Carpooling & Rideshare

Related Links

Texas Department ofTransportation

TransportationTransportation Improvement Program

The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization's (SETRPC-MPO) short-range transportation plan for the JeffersonOrange Hardin Regional Transportation Study area. The TIP presents the various highway and transitprojects that are expected to be let for construction or implementation within the next four years. Allregional transportation projects and programs are required to be identified and prioritized in the TIP in orderto tbe eligible for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds.

Proposed FY 2017-2020 TIP - For Public Comments

Revised FY 2015-2018 TIP - Amendment 3

Revised FY 2015-2018 February TIP 2016 Quarterly Revision with Approval Letters

Revised FY 2015-2018 TIP

Revised FY 2015-2018 May Quarterly Revision With Approval Letters



Exempt FY 2015-2018 TIP

FHWA Approval Letter

SETRPC-MPO Annual Transportation Project Listing

2014 Annual Transportation Project Listing




© 2016 South East Texas Regional Planning Commission

About Us | Contact Us | SETRPC Home |

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-8

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=2






http://setrpc.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=1












http://www.txdot.gov/

http://www.setrpc.org/JOHRTS%202017%20to%202020%20TIP%20Draft.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/JOHRTS%20Fy%202015-2018%20TIP%20Amendment%203%20with%20FHA%20Approval%20Letter.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/Revised%20FY%202015-2018%20TIP%20Amendment%203%2012142015.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/Revised%20FY%202015-2018%20TIP_Adopted.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/files/transportation/tip/15-18/Exempt%20JOHRTS_FY%202015-2018_TIP.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/2015-2018%20TIP%20Approval%20Letter.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/files/transportation/SETRPC%20MPO%20FY%202015%20ATPL%20as%20Submitted%20for%20approval.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/files/transportation/tip/ATPL/FY2013_SETRPC-MPO_ATPL.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/files/transportation/tip/ATPL/FY2012_SETRPC-MPO_ATPL.pdf

http://www.setrpc.org/ter/files/transportation/tip/fy2011_ATPL.pdf



http://www.setrpc.org/

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-9

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-10

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-11

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


E-12

APPENDIX F

REVISIONS This appendix contains supporting documentation of revisions to the JOHRTS FY 2017-

2020 TIP.

DRAFT FO

R

ADOPTION


F-1

President – Fred Williams, Kountze ǀ 1st VP - Kirk Roccaforte, Bridge City ǀ 2nd VP - Eddie Arnold, Jefferson County 3rd VP - Chris Kirkendall, Hardin County ǀ Treasurer - David Dubose, Orange County ǀ Secretary – Rebecca Ford, Bevil Oaks




May 26, 2016 To: Jefferson-Orange-Hardin Regional Transportation Study (JOHRTS)

Transportation Planning Committee (TPC) From: Bob Dickinson, Director Transportation and Environmental Resources Division Subject: Revisions to the JOHRTS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) – 2040,

Amendment #4 Please find enclosed for your review and approval the DRAFT Revisions to the JOHRTS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) – 2040, Amendment #4. If any questions arise, please feel free to contact me at (409) 899-8444 x7520. BD Enclosures


P.L. 114-94

Fixing America’s Surface Transportation

Key Highway Provisions

(FAST) Act

2

Surface Transportation Authorization

FAST Act • Signed by President Obama on December 4, 2015

• First long-term authorization act in a decade

• Provides 5 years of funding certainty

• Authorizes $305 B (all modes) over FY 2016-2020

• $70 B in transfers to keep the Highway Trust Fund solvent; fully “paid for” (offset) by unrelated savings

3

HIGHWAY SAFETY

T R A N S P O R TAT I O N . O R G 4

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY & EDUCATION

5

RDT&E Funding Program Avg. Annual

Funding (millions)

Change from FY

2015 Highway R&D

Alternative Funding Demonstration Grants Future Interstate Study Performance Management Data Support

$ 125.0*

[19.0] [1.0]

[up to 10.0]

+8.7%

Technology & Innovation Deployment Program Accelerated Implementation of Pavement Tech.

67.4*

[12.0] +7.8

Training & Education 24.0 0.0

Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 100.0* 0.0

University Transportation Centers 75.5 +4.1

Bureau of Transportation Statistics 26.0 0.0

*Advanced Transportation & Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Grants (to be funded from Highway R&D, TIDP, & ITS Research)

[$60.0]*

Flexible funding in HRD, TIDP, and ITS programs 200.0 -24.7

6

Research and Innovation The FAST Act Emphasizes Deployment and Demonstrations

• Research, Innovation, and UTC programs are overall increased by about 4%

• New legislative earmarks and designations reduce FHWA discretionary funding by 20-25%

Advanced Transportation & Congestion Management Technologies Deployment - $60M per FY out of:

• Highway R&D program, • Technology and Innovation Deployment program, and • ITS program

Surface Transp. System Funding Alternatives Demonstrations

• Funding: $15M in FY’16; $20M in following years • Funded out of Highway R&D program

Future Interstate Study by TRB; up to $5M R&D funds in FY 2016

New Performance Management Data Support Program

• Funding: up to $10M per year out of Highway R&D program

7

Other Research Provisions • Every Day Counts specifically authorized in the FAST Act • Annual Modal Research Plans

• Requirement to submit annual plans to the Secretary • Intent: to avoid duplication of efforts

• Consolidated Research Database • USDOT 5-year Strategic Plan • New Transportation Technology Policy Working

Group

8

University Transportation Centers (UTC) Grant Competition • Structure: The FAST Act maintains most of the existing

structure of this fully competitive program • Five years of funding, Federal fiscal years 2016-2020 • 5 National Centers, 10 Regional Centers, up to 20 Tier I Centers • 100% match for National/Regional Centers; 50% match for Tier I

Centers. • Changes: All UTC grants will now be made to consortia

• Lead universities may compete for multiple grants • Grant awards may be in a range of amounts, rather than a fixed

amount • Two-year institutions of higher education may now participate

• Process: Competition will be conducted during FY 2016 • Federal Register Notice published February 2 • Grant Solicitation will be released as soon as possible

• More at: www.rita.dot.gov/utc/

http://www.rita.dot.gov/utc/

Smart City Challenge • The goal: To show what is possible when communities use

technology to connect multimodal transportation assets into an interactive network.

• The approach: The Challenge will concentrate federal resources into one medium-sized city, selected through a nationwide competition. • Five planning grants to be awarded • 77 proposals received by the February 4 deadline

• The funding: up to $40 million to one mid-sized city that puts forward bold, data-driven ideas to improve lives by making transportation safer, easier, and more reliable.

• Much more at: https://www.transportation.gov/smartcity

https://www.transportation.gov/smartcity

HIGHWAY SAFETY

T R A N S P O R TAT I O N . O R G

30

• Focus on Highway Safety - The FAST Act increases the focus on roadway safety infrastructure and on the safety needs of pedestrians.

• Removes MAP-21 eligibility which allowed use of HSIP

funds for non-infrastructure safety programs, such as education and enforcement activities.

• Prohibits rental car agencies and car dealers with fleets of more than 35 cars from renting vehicles that have been recalled but not repaired.

HIGHWAY SAFETY

T R A N S P O R TAT I O N . O R G

12

• Triples the maximum fine the NHTSA can levy against an automaker that violates safety defect regulations from $35 million to $105 million per violation.

• Doubles the time automakers would have to retain safety records from five years to ten years.

• Revises 5-star rating system for new cars to also reflect whether the vehicle comes equipped with crash avoidance systems like automatic braking and lane-change monitoring.

KEY FACTS

13

Key Highway Facts • $226.3 B for highways over 5 years (FY 2016-2020)

• $225.2 B in contract authority • $1.1 B from the General Fund

• Builds on the program structure and reforms of MAP-21

• Continued focus on accelerating project delivery

• Adds a new freight formula and expands freight network

• Adds a new discretionary program for nationally significant freight and highway projects

14

FAST Act – Central Texas Corridor and I-14 • Central Texas Corridor as a High

Priority Corridor. • “… commencing at the logical

terminus of Interstate Route 10, generally following portions of United States Route 190 eastward, passing in the vicinity Fort Hood, Killeen, Belton, Temple, Bryan, College Station, Huntsville, Livingston, and Woodville, to the logical terminus of Texas Highway 63 at the Sabine River Bridge at Burrs Crossing”.

• Also designated it as I-14.

15

TIFIA • Changes to TIFIA (beyond 71% funding cut)

• New eligibilities for transit-oriented development (TOD), capitalizing rural projects fund in a SIB

• Lower min. cost ($10 M) for local government applicants and for TOD

• TIFIA now eligible under NHPP, STBGP, Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects

• No more requirement to redistribute uncommitted TIFIA funds

• Reserves at least $2 M to be used in lieu of fee payment by applicants for loans for projects costing less than $75 M

16

Changes to NHPP and STP Prgm Changes

NHPP • TIFIA costs and V2I communication equipment now eligible

• Bridge resurfacing/preservation/reconstruction on non-NHS Federal-aid highways now eligible

STP • Renamed: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG)

• Eligibilities restated with none eliminated; new eligibilities for TIFIA costs, State P3 office, V2I communication equipment

• In border States, up to 5% for infrastructure projects eligible under the SAFETEA-LU border program

• More suballocation: +1%/year up to 55% (vs. 50% today)

• Set-asides for Transportation Alternatives and Recreational Trails (see next slide)

17

FINANCE

18

FY2016 - 2020 Budget Authority = $305B Program 5-Year

Funding % of Total

Federal Highway Administration $226.3B 74.2%

Federal Transit Administration $61.1B 20.0%

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

$3.2B 1.0%

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Administration

$0.4B 0.1%

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

$4.7 1.5%

Federal Railroad Administration $10.3 3.4%

Total $305.0B

19

APPORTIONED PROGRAMS

20

HSIP

92% of Highway Funds Are Apportioned

CMAQ

Transportation Alternatives

Rec Trails

Grade Crossings

Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Program

Metro Planning

National Highway Performance Program

National Highway Freight Program

$207.4 B over 5 years

PLANNING, PERFORMANCE & PROJECT DELIVERY

22

Planning & Performance • More consultation and participation

• Enables participation by public ports, private transportation providers • Encourages MPO consultation with other types of planning activities

• Changes to selection criteria for MPO officials

• Other changes to planning and performance

• TIPs/STIPs/long-range plans must include facilities that support intercity transportation

• New planning considerations: resiliency/reliability, stormwater mitigation, and enhancement of travel/tourism

• Long-range State plan must describe perf. measures and targets • Consequence (reporting) for State making insufficient progress

toward freight targets

23

Changes to TAP, CMAQ, and HSIP Prgm Changes “TAP” • Same program, but no longer called TAP; no name specified

• All funds set aside from STBG (vs. from all formula programs today) • Nonprofits responsible for local transportation safety programs may be

project sponsors

CMAQ • V2I communication equipment eligible • Port-related equipment & vehicles eligible under PM2.5 set-aside • Exception from PM2.5 set-aside for low population density States

(under certain conditions)

HSIP • Only listed project types eligible—mostly infrastructure-related • Adds eligibility for V2I communication equipment and certain

pedestrian safety improvements • State need not collect certain data on unpaved roads

(but can’t use HSIP funds on those roads until it collects the data)

24

Accelerating Project Delivery A major theme of the FAST Act, with 18 separate provisions in the highway title alone. The Act—

• Adds New Flexibilities • Section 4(f) exemption for some bridges • Authorizes taking of nesting swallows in at-risk bridges

• Refines Existing Provisions • Narrows concurrence requirement for PEL • Pilot for substitution of State law for NEPA

25

Tolling/HOV • Tolling –

• Technical clean up of statutory language • Requires same treatment on certain toll facilities for over-the-road

buses and transit buses • Must consult MPO on toll placement/amount for HOT lanes on

Interstate facilities within metropolitan planning area

• ISRRPP – Expiration timeframe for provisional approvals: • Those in place before FAST Act expire 1 year after enactment of FAST

Act (with possible 1-year extension) • New ones (post-FAST) expire after 3 years (w/possible 1 yr. extension)

• Allows waiver of sanctions for degraded HOV operation under certain conditions

26

HIGHWAY DESIGN PROGRAM & OTHER PROVISIONS

27

Highway Design

• On NHS, requires designs to consider “cost savings by utilizing flexibility that exists in current design guidance and regulations.”

• constructed/natural environment • environ., scenic, aesthetic, historic, community, & preservation impacts • access for other modes • cost savings via flexibility in current design guidance/regulations | NEW

28

Highway Design • Adds the AASHTO Highway Safety Manual and the Urban

Street Design Guide by the National Association of City Transportation Officials to the list of resources to be utilized for design criteria development

• Encouragement for States/MPOs to adopt standards for Fed. projects that accommodate motorized and non-motorized users

• Local entities that are direct recipients of Federal dollars may be allowed to use a design publication that is different than one used by their State DOT

29

Other Provisions • Specifically allows multiple similar bridge projects to be

handled (“bundled”) into a single project

• DOT to designate national electric vehicle charging and hydrogen, natural gas, and propane fueling corridors

• Encouragement of vegetation management practices that improve habitat and forage for pollinators

30

Drop slide?

FREIGHT

31

National Highway Freight Program

• FAST Act Freight provisions of interest to FHWA

• Two new programs (one formula-based, and the other discretionary) that will, for the first time, dedicate Federal funding to freight projects, including multimodal projects.

32

National Highway Freight Program • $1.2 B / year (average), apportioned to States by formula ($6.3 B total / 5 years).

• Funded out of HTF

• Eligible activities: • Construction • ITS, including Freight ITS • Truck-only lanes • Truck parking facilities • Project development activities

• States using formula dollars are required to complete a State Freight Plan.

• Maximum 10% of a State’s freight funds may be used for freight rail, water facilities (including ports), and intermodal facilities.

• Repeals the increased Federal share for freight projects established by MAP-21.

33

Nationally Significant Freight & Hwy Projects • Discretionary Program (grants minimum of $25 M)

• $4.5 B over 5 years

• Funded out of HTF

• Eligible activities: • Highway freight projects on NHF Network • NHS highway/bridge projects, projects in National Scenic Areas • Non-highway projects limited to $500 M over 5 years • Sets aside $1.2 B of HSIP funds over 5 years for section 130 highway-rail

grade crossing program

• States, large MPOs, Tribes, local agencies, and Federal Land Management Agencies may apply.

• OST selects projects; Congress has 60 days to disapprove.

• Set-asides for rural areas and projects below cost threshold.

34

Other Freight Provisions • State Freight Plans are required & Advisory Committees are

encouraged. State Freight Plans must be updated every 5 years.

• The FAST Act requires the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) to collect and annually report performance measures for the nation’s top 25 ports, as measured by three methods (total tonnage, containers, and dry bulk tonnage).

• Port Performance Statistics Program which will require ports of certain thresholds to report annual throughput.

• National Multimodal Freight Network (NMFN) designated within 1 year of enactment.

• USDOT is required to create a National Multimodal Freight Policy

35

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

36

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ASSET MANAGEMENT

37

Performance Management

• No new performance measures.

• Reporting cycles and penalties: Reduces reporting cycle from two to one before penalties are imposed.

• Safety data collection on rural roads.

• Achievement of freight performance targets.

• Establishes performance data support program.

Asset Management • No changes

37

!(

!(

!(!(

_̂

¬«O4

¬«J10

¬«J14

¬«J9¬«O1

¬«O3

¬«J6

¬«J12

¬«J4

¬«J3

¬«J2

¬«J15¬«J17

¬«J1

¬«J18

¬«O5

¬«H3B

¬« H3A

¬«O2

¬«O2A

¬« H4

¬«H3

¬«J11

¬«J8

¬«O7

¬«J7

¬«O8

¬«H2

¬«O6

P o l kP o l k

C h a m b e r sC h a m b e r s

L i b e r t yL i b e r t y

J a s p e rJ a s p e r

T y l e rT y l e r

N e w t o nN e w t o n

¬«H1

£¤90Y£¤90Y

UV12

UV87UV62

UV73

§̈¦10

³±105

³±2802

³±1130

³±1131

³±1442

³±408

³±1135

³±3247

³±1132

³±2177

³±3247

£¤69£¤96

EF74

³±421

³±943

³±1293

³±787

³±92

³±770

³±418

³±2937

³±420

³±1003

³±1122

³±3513

³±3063³±770

³±1003

§̈¦10

£¤90

£¤69

£¤69

UV105

UV326

UV327

UV73

UV87

UV124

UV82

UV347

UV105

UV326

£¤96F

³±365

³±366

³±364

³±1406

³±1009

³±3514

³±3322

EF93

EF380

EF136

VOTAW

BATSON

REEVES

SILSBEE

THICKET

KOUNTZE

WILDWOOD

GRAYBURG

SARATOGA

SOUR LAKE

LUMBERTON

OLD HARDIN

HONEY ISLAND

VILLAGE MILLS

ROSE HILL ACRES

EF69

VIDOR

ORANGEROSE CITYPINEHURST

BRIDGE CITY

WEST ORANGEORANGEFIELD

PINE FOREST

MAURICEVILLE

NomeChina

Cheek

Meeker

Groves

Fannett

La Belle

Hamshire

Nederland

Bevil Oaks

New Bethel

Pine Island

Port Neches

Port Arthur

Taylor Landing

Beauxart Gardens

IH 10 Landscape ProjectsVarious location Total Cost $432,659.0092.51% completeDistrictwide8 locationJefferson, Hardin, Orange LandscapingTotal Cost $832,522.0193.20% CompleteHardin Co Shoulder Rumble stripsUS 96 & US 69Total Cost $96,615.100% completed2016 Seal CoatDistrictwide (Liberty)Total Cost $7,862,753.540% CompleteUS 69 Landscaping6-locations-JeffersonTotal Cost $718,877.7987.98% CompleteDistrict wide-NewtonCenterline Rumble stripsTotal Cost $114,947.690% Complete

May StatusRegional Transportation Projects

J e f f e r s o n , H a r d i n , O r a n g eJ e f f e r s o n , H a r d i n , O r a n g e

J1 - Concord Road, Beaumont Widen city street to 4 lanes Total Cost $11,284,746.71 49.37% completeJ2 - US 69 at SS 93 Slope Repair Total Cost $3,588,710.24 0.74% completeJ3 - FM 365 at Ground Gully Replace Bridge Total Cost $1,565,852.57 10.82% completeJ4 - Pt Neches Ave Sidewalks/Ramps Total Cost $749,492.52 8.79% complete J6 - SH 87 Intracoastal Bridge Rehab Bridge Total Cost $3,454,612.26 81.83% CompleteJ7 - US 69-Eastex Fwy From SH 105 to IH 10 Ramp relocation & FR Total Cost $27,390,861.67 70.00% completeJ8 - SH 87 SH 347 To US 69 Overlay Roadway Total Cost $3,158,875.97 4.07% completeJ9 - CR - Trinity Island Bridge Replace Bridge to Trinity Island Total Cost $2,984,343.40 44.45% completeJ10 - SH 73 at Rainbow Bridge Clean & repaint Total Cost $26,599,824.20 90.56% completeJ11 - FM 365 E. of IH 10 Safety treat/upgrade Bridge rails Total Cost $400,896.15 0% completeJ12 - IH 10 at FM 364 Reconstruct Interchange Total Cost $29,990,329.95 43.08% completeJ14 - Port of Port Arthur install RR tracks Total Cost $4,297,854.65 100% Complete J15 - FM 365, Green Pond Gully Replace Bridge Total Cost $1,196,548.36 40.49% complete

J17 - FM 1406, Vogel Gully Replace Bridge Total Cost $994,488.34 37.15% completeJ18 - SH 73 at Neches bridges Repair/replace Dolphins Total Cost $3,865,734.00 30.71% Complete

H1 - US 69 SH 327 to Ellis Dr. Widen/overlay Add Cont Left Turn Lane Total Cost $7,502,185.05 29.70% CompleteH2 - FM 943 Additional Surface Width Total Cost $2,607,577.21 87.80% complete H3 - FM 418 Safety treat widen shlds Total Cost $1,031,113.54 0% completeH3A-FM 1003 Safety treat objects Total Cost $46,474.4 0% completeH3B-FM 787 Safety treat objects Total Cost $204,002.85 0% completeH4 - FM 92 Safety treat objects Total Cost $339,263.41 0% complete

O1 - IH 10 at Neches River Replace Bridge Total Cost $58,877,950.00 77.87% completeO2 - FM 1130 Safety Treat Objects Total Cost $461,438.96 0% completeO2A-FM 1136 Safety Treat Objects Total Cost $374,816.84 0% completeO3 - IH 10 Adams Bayou to Sabine River Reconstruct & replace Bridges Extend Frontage Roads Total Cost $68,441,218.70 39.70% complete

O4 - RR Tracks Near Old Hwy 90 Construct Grade Separated of railroad tracks To Port Total Cost $8,977,087.38 33.46% CompleteO5 - IH 10-Widen to 6 Lanes KCRR to FM 1442 Total Cost $13,089,624.73 8.35% CompleteO6 - Port Of Orange Upgrade Rail within Port Total Cost $677,866.15 0% complete O7 - FM 105 UP RRxing for 6.3 Miles Add Shoulders Total Cost $2,668,330.65 0.37% Complete O8 - FM 1130 KCS RR to Little Cypress Dr Widen Paved Surface Total Cost $2,917,601.83 31.31% Complete

DISTRICT WIDE PROJECTSNot shown on Map

³

LLOOUUIISSIIAANNAA

Texas Department of TransportationTransportation Planning & Development

Produced by Sue TidwellMay, 2016

JEFFERSON COUNTY

HARDIN COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

So grab a friend and carpool to this lunch event.

Carpoolsetx.org 1-844-WE-CARPOOL

ISTC Facility Wednesday, June 1, 2016

11:30 to 1:30 / Lunch Served

Join us for lunch, to encourage employers and employees from industry, local businesses, and

organizations to join a commuter program and save money. This networking event provides educational efforts to reduce congestion and ways to form a commuter team

beneficial to employers and employees alike.

located at 3749 Highway 69 North, Beaumont

To RSVP for this event, please contact [email protected]

Wednesday , June 1 from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. at theInternational Safety Training Council (ISTC) training facility

TENTATIVE AGENDA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE …...2018/05/02 · 2. SETRPC staff attended a TxDOT...

Documents

Transcript of TENTATIVE AGENDA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE …...2018/05/02 · 2. SETRPC staff attended a TxDOT...