Go vs. Ombudsman, 2003 - Revocation of Insurer's License - Insurance
Tejano vs Ombudsman
2
C009Tejano vs. Ombudsman ,GR 159190, 30 June 2005; Second Division, Chico-Nazario [J FACTS: !n 0" Nove#$er 199%, &niano &' Desier(o, (hen (he S)ecia* +rosecu(or, concurred in(he a))rova* o his su$ordina(es on (he i*in o (he )ro)er in or#a(ion or vio*a(ion o Sec(ion3.e/ o Re)u$*ic &c( No' 3019 a ains( )e(i(ioner Ca e(ano &' e ano, Jr', Juana de*a Cruz and icen(e de*a Cruz o 4G' & (er ards, (he case as i*ed i(h (he Sandi an$a an, )e(i(ioner i*ed i(h (he Sandi an$a an an 6r en( 7o(ion or a +eriod o i#e (o 8i*e 7o(ion or Reinves(i a(ion' Sandi an$a an ran(ed (he #o(ion or reinves(i a(ion and ordered (he ! iceo (he S)ecia* +rosecu(or (o conduc( (he reinves(i a(ion' 6)on reinves(i a(ion, convinced (ha(no )ro$a$*e cause e is(ed (o indic( )e(i(ioner e ano, and s)ouses Juana and icen(e de*aCruz, S)ecia* +rosecu(or 7icae*, reco##ended (he dis#issa* o (he case' !n 10 Dece#$er 1999, !#$uds#an &niano &' Desier(o, ho ear*ier )ar(ici)a(ed in (he ini(ia* )re*i#inar inves(i a(ion as S)ecia* +rosecu(or, disa))roved (he reco##enda(ion or (he dis#issa* o (he case i(h (he #arina* no(e : assign the ca se toanother prosec utor t o pros ecute the c ase aggr es si ve ly. ISSUE: <!N => !7?6DS7&N @S J6S @8@>D @N D@S&++R! >D@NG =>R>C!77>ND& @!N 8!R => D@S7@SS&A !8 => C&S>' HELD. N!' Due )r ocess dic( a(es (ha( one ca** ed u)on (o r eso* ve a dis)u( e #ano( revi e h isdecision on a))ea*' =avi n )ar (ici) a(ed in (he ini(ia* )re* i#inar inve s(i a(ion o (he ins( an( caseand ha vi n re co ##ended (he i *i n o an a))ro)ria(e in or#a(ion, i( $ehooved !#$uds#anDesier(o (o recuse hi#se* ro# )ar(ici)a(in in (he revie o (he sa#e durin (hereinves(ia(ion'
description
Due Process
Transcript of Tejano vs Ombudsman
7/21/2019 Tejano vs Ombudsman
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tejano-vs-ombudsman-56d953faa0e74 1/1
C009Tejano vs. Ombudsman,GR 159190, 30 June 2005; Second Division, Chico-Nazario [JFACTS:!n 0" Nove#$er 199%, &niano &' Desier(o, (hen (he S)ecia* +rosecu(or, concurred in(he a))rova* o his su$ordina(es on (hei*in o (he )ro)er inor#a(ion or vio*a(ion o Sec(ion3.e/ o Re)u$*ic &c( No' 3019 aains( )e(i(ioner Cae(ano &' eano, Jr',Juana de*a Cruz andicen(e de*a Cruz o 4G' &(erards, (he case as i*ed i(h (he Sandian$aan, )e(i(ioner i*ed i(h(he Sandian$aan an 6ren( 7o(ion or a +eriod o i#e (o 8i*e 7o(ion or Reinves(ia(ion' Sandian$aan ran(ed(he #o(ion or reinves(ia(ion and ordered (he !iceo (he S)ecia* +rosecu(or (o conduc( (he reinves(ia(ion' 6)onreinves(ia(ion, convinced (ha(no )ro$a$*e cause eis(ed (o indic( )e(i(ioner eano, and s)ouses Juana and icen(e de*aCruz,S)ecia* +rosecu(or 7icae*, reco##ended (he dis#issa* o (he case' !n 10 Dece#$er 1999, !#$uds#an &niano &'Desier(o, ho ear*ier )ar(ici)a(ed in (he ini(ia* )re*i#inarinves(ia(ion as S)ecia* +rosecu(or, disa))roved (hereco##enda(ion or (he dis#issa* o (hecase i(h (he #arina* no(e :assign the case to another prosecutor to prosecute the case aggressively.
ISSUE:<!N => !7?6DS7&N @S J6S@8@>D @N D@S&++R!>D@NG =>R>C!77>ND&@!N 8!R => D@S7@SS&A !8=> C&S>'
HELD.N!' Due )rocess dic(a(es (ha( one ca**ed u)on (o reso*ve a dis)u(e #a no( revie hisdecision on a))ea*' =avin)ar(ici)a(ed in (he ini(ia* )re*i#inar inves(ia(ion o (he ins(an( caseand havin reco##ended (he i*in o ana))ro)ria(e inor#a(ion, i( $ehooved !#$uds#anDesier(o (o recuse hi#se* ro# )ar(ici)a(in in (he revie o (hesa#e durin (hereinves(ia(ion'
