etransfair.eu technology... · Web viewAll texts should be collected from websites and converted...

TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGY eMODULE

Author: Zita KrajcsoAuthor: Juan José Arevalillo (Unit 1 Activity 3)Provider: Centre for Translation Studies, University of ViennaSubject area: specialised translationTitle of the resource: eTransFair e-module on TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGYLicence: CC BY 4.0

MODULE1 “TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGY”

In this module you learn about translation technology. The module consists of units and each unit deals with a different aspect of the topic (see table above). At the beginning of each unit you find the learning outcome to be reached after completing the learning activities. You also find information on the learning context, f.i. competences required for the specific content provided in the unit, technical and other requirements and your workload given in minutes. For your orientation an overview of the activities and their main characteristics (title, description, rationale etc.) are also provided. Afterwards you find the activities in a worksheet. At the end a reference for further reading is given.

Please feel free to add your own examples (own activities, best practices, used methods, assessment techniques etc.) to the list of units because not all aspects of quality management could be considered in this module.

Below you will find the module’s structure divided into units and indicating the topic to be dealt with.

Module “TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGY”Unit 1 Introduction to translation productivity toolsUnit 2 Evaluation of translation productivity toolsUnit 3 Use of translation productivity tools

1 The module could either be used for individual training or as part of an existing training programme. All activities within the modules are only ideas and cannot be regarded as an entire course or constitute the main part of a training course.


Table of contentsUNIT 1: INTRODUCTION TO TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS.................................................5

ACTIVITY 1 TECHNOLOGY - THE EXTENSION OF HUMAN CAPABILITIES.......................................................10

ACTIVITY 2 INTRODUCTION TO TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS..........................................................10

ACTIVITY 3 TECHNOLOGY - PAST AND FUTURE........................................................................................11

UNIT 2: EVALUATION OF TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS....................................................12

ACTIVITY 1 WHICH TOOL TO CHOOSE?...................................................................................................17

ACTIVITY 2 A TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOL IN DETAIL......................................................................17

ACTIVITY 3 WORKFLOW OF TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS..............................................................18

UNIT 3: USE OF TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS...................................................................20

ACTIVITY 1 WEBINAR - CAT TOOLS........................................................................................................33

ACTIVITY 2 TRANSLATION REQUEST........................................................................................................34

ACTIVITY 3 TRANSLATION COMMENTARY.................................................................................................35

ACTIVITY 4 MACHINE TRANSLATION - EVALUATION...................................................................................36

ACTIVITY 5 COMPARISON OF MACHINE TRANSLATIONS.............................................................................37

ACTIVITY 6 CORPUS.............................................................................................................................. 37

List of figures........................................................................................................................................... 38

List of references.....................................................................................................................................38


Didactical background information for trainer

Structure of activities:individual work / work in small groups → discussion in small groups / whole-class → evaluation in small groups / whole-class → evaluation by trainerThis way learning occurs through: knowledge activation → knowledge extension → knowledge organisation → knowledge assessment.

Attention! We move from knowledge orientation (what) to competence orientation (how) through inquire- based learning.

Inquire-based learning: Problem-oriented: real-life problems of future translators are embedded into activities Research-based: trainees get as little instructions as possible, knowledge and competence will

be acquired through searching (info-mining competence). Up-to-date: trainees do not learn to work with one specific tool (tools and their functions get

obsolete!) rather they develop a toolkit to evaluate tools. Future-oriented: sharpening a sense of staying/keeping informed (e.g. through activities linked

to future work – Unit 1, activity 4) Fosters critical thinking through questioning, e.g. evaluation method:

1) evaluating according to own criteria (basic) 2) evaluating according to guidelines (complex) – questioning own evaluation criteria

Includes not only rational but also other aspects of real-life, e.g. emotions like fear/anxiety related to machine translation

Fosters teamwork through steadily changing group-composition (at the beginning also place for individual study)

Fosters communication through presentation in different teams and in whole-class Fosters communication through guidelines and toolkits (e.g. how to verbalise arguments

regarding a translation choice / how to evaluate tools) Trainee-centred learning: trainer steps back and has a guiding role.

Transferability: Synergies can be transferred with other subjects: through links between modules / working

collaboratively across subject boundaries → Cross-curricular working and close cooperation between lecturers are required

Content and language is replaceable through other topics, languages, e.g. in Unit 3, Activity 2, 4 Transferable skills are fostered through activities / linking activities to other modules. What has

been learnt in one module will be required in another one and vice versa. Working with as many group members in peer or in small groups as possible fosters reflection

and evaluation by giving feedback and/or receiving it from others Connected to professional future: trainees get to know different tools e.g. through evaluation

rather than learning to work with one specific tool which will be out-of-date/obsolete when they start work

Evaluation may include presentation in whole-class – trainer extends missing information (presence needed) or collects ideas in white board (distance learning – presence not needed).


In case of simultaneous work (e.g. Unit 2, Activity 2) it is better to use online tools to avoid redundancies.


UNIT 1: INTRODUCTION TO TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS

Learning outcome

After completing this unit you will have an overview of the translation productivity tools available on the market.

Learning contextPre-requisites Understanding the general concepts of translation.

Having a sound basis competence in ICT.Learning Environment

Computer, internet and beamer

Time/Workload

180 min

Overview of learning activitiesTitle Description Rationale/goal Type of activity Assessment Estimated

timeframe1. Technology - the extension of human capabilities

Discussion about how technology affects our work as translator

Activating knowledge with regard to the capacity of technology

Brainstorming, presenting ideas in whole-class,structuring ideas by trainer

Feedback from the whole group & trainer

20 min+10 min feedback from the group & trainer

2. Introduction to translation productivity tools

Brainstorming on well-known tools

Extending and structuring knowledge in the field of translation productivity tools

Brainstorming, presenting ideas in whole-class,structuring ideas by trainer


30 min+20 minfeedback from the group & trainer

3. Technology - past and future

Individual research on the history of tools and translators’ rolesDiscussion about translators’ future working conditions

Discussing the past & future and fears; initiate curiosity and an attitude for keeping informed

Reading and discussion in small groups

Feedback from trainer in form of a presentation: how translators’ work change

Individual work: 60 minDiscussion:30 min


Background information for trainer:

Activity 1

Following areas of human abilities/capacities can be enhanced through technology: mobility interaction sociability speed, memory reliability consistency information processing creation of artefacts etc.

Rubrics distance mental capabilities cognitive capabilities etc.

Activity 2

According to ISO 17100:2015 Translation technologies can include the following:a) content management systems (CMSs);b) authoring systems;c) desktop publishing;d) word processing software;e) translation management systems (TMSs);f) translation memory (TM) tools and computer aided translation (CAT);g) quality assurance tools;h) revision tools;i) localization tools;j) machine translation (MT);k) terminology management systems;l) project management software;m) speech-to-text recognition software.

Translation technologies can also include other relevant existing and future translation technology.

Bibliography

ISO 17100:2015 Translation services — Requirements for translation services

History of technology applied to translation industry in general


Background for trainees

Trainer will explain the development of technology in the last century and the current one, as well as the way those development has impacted the way translators and project managers work. Background for trainers

The trainer will explain how the technological evolution has been developed in the previous century with the different waves in computing and how those developments impacted the way translation industry changed.

The appearance of the electric typewriter, the first text processors, the desktop publishing, the CAT systems, the project management systems and machine translation systems are just linear examples of evolution which significantly changed the way translators and companies perform their work.

The trainer will work on the document ‘Technologies for translation’ (Freigang, 2009), where a complete history of translation technology evolution is listed, which a special focus on CAT tools, which set the beginning of the translation technology up today. This document is a starting point for discussion.

In 2008 Zetzche coined the acronym TEnTs for Translation Environment Tools, replacing the older term Translation Workbench or Translation Workstation. In this article Zetzche stated the following:

Mazes of tents? Of course, I am not talking about tents made of fabric, poles, ropes, and pegs. Instead, I am referring to translation environment tools (TEnTs). As the name suggests, these TEnTs provide translators with an environment that allows them to work productively. This environment includes a translation memory and a terminology database, but it also provides features for quality assurance, spell-checking, workflow management, project management, analysis, support for complex file formats, and so forth. Anyone who has even glanced into the market of commercially available TEnTs will know about tools like Trados, Star Transit, Déjà Vu, and across, and it would be hard enough to make a choice among those. However, it becomes exponentially harder when you look more closely and find more than a dozen tools!.

Other authors state similar ideas, such as Alcina (2008: 79): “Translation technologies constitute an important new field of interdisciplinary study lying midway between computer science and translation. Its development in the professional world will largely depend on its academic progress and the effective introduction of translation technologies in the translators training curriculum”.

As an illustration which can serve as a base for discussion, the trainees can comment on this image:


Figure 1 The future according to FIT (EUATC and Hermes Traducciones, 2017)

According to the Trend Report 2018 the future developments may include the following:

industry will change with cloud-based services, connectivity and big data the human brain will be almost fully understood the computing power will be able to replicate human brain AI will understand cultural context ethical, moral and economic implications of AI will be clarified the limits of AI will become much clearer businesses will be concerned about liability in the absence of human agents only minimalist approaches will survive CAT-tools’ complexity will be reduced ‘intelligent’ user interfaces will be built technological results will be improved in background / without making the user learn or operate

something new more and more solutions will adapt to our preferences

Bibliography

Alcina, A. (2008): Translation technologies: scope, tools and resouces. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233657002_Translation_technologies_Scope_tools_and_resources

EUATC and Hermes Traducciones, 2017

Freigang, J. (2009). “Technologies for translation”. http://eventi.dipintra.it/tetra/convegni/tetra_1/allegati/freigang.pdf >.

Slator: https://slator.com/sponsored-content/important-trends-translation-technology-2018/

Trend Report 2018 https://memoqtrendreport.com/about/

Zetzsche, J. (2008). “A Maze of TEnTs”. ATA Chronicle, July 2008. Alexandria: ATA. 47.

https://memoqtrendreport.com/about/

http://eventi.dipintra.it/tetra/convegni/tetra_1/allegati/freigang.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233657002_Translation_technologies_Scope_tools_and_resources



WORKSHEET

ACTIVITY 1 TECHNOLOGY - THE EXTENSION OF HUMAN CAPABILITIES

Discuss in small groups (2-3) how technology can extend human capacities in the field of (specialised) translation. List the concrete areas technology affect:

-

-

-

-

-

-

ACTIVITY 2 INTRODUCTION TO TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS

Brainstorm in your group on the hardware / software professional translators use nowadays. Capture your ideas by creating a mind map. Try to group the tools according to similarities.

TRANSLATOR


ACTIVITY 3 TECHNOLOGY - PAST AND FUTURE

Individual research: Study the history of technology applied to translation industry in general and the role translators played. Fill in the timeline with information about the main developments and the translator’s role.

Group work: Discuss in small groups (3-4) what will happen in the translation industry in the future. What do you think how would look like your daily business in the future? Complement the timeline’s information boxes with the main result of the discussion.

Timeline Developments in translation technology Role of the translator

FUTURE


UNIT 2: EVALUATION OF TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS

Learning outcome

After completing this unit you will have a toolkit for the evaluation of translation productivity tools.


Having a solid basis competence in ICT.Learning Environment


Time/Workload

140 min


timeframe1. Which tool to choose?

Finding aspects playing a role by the decision making procedure for or against a translation productivity tools

Initiating efficient decision making procedure regarding translation productivity tools

Individual research+Collecting and presenting ideas in whole-class


30 min+20 min feedback from whole group & trainer

2.A translation productivity tool in detail

Detailed description of a specific translation productivity tool and summarizing its main characteristics.

Learning the functions of a specific translation productivity tool

Individual research+Presentation in whole-class


30 min+20 minfeedback from whole group & trainer

3. Workflow of translation productivity tools

Comparison of workflow mechanisms

Learning which workflow activities can be done by a spec. tool

Presentation in whole-class

Feedback from peers

40 min



Activity 1

- price vs. free version- user-friendliness (ease of setup/doing business with, etc.)- trial- license duration- languages supported- target customer size- customer review- support - webinars / tutorials- operating systems Web/Installed and Mobile- compatibility- interoperability (eg. MemoQ vs. Trados → Plugins)- system requirements

- features: Billing & Invoicing Collaboration CRM For Software For Websites Localization Automation Machine Translation Marketing Management Order Management Permission Management Project Tracking Quality Control Quotes / Estimates Resource Management Terminology Management Translation Analytics Translator Database Version Control Workflow Management

Bibliography

https://www.capterra.com/translation-management-software/compare/162762-151746/memoQ-vs-SDL-Trados-Studio

https://www.g2crowd.com/compare/sdl-trados-studio-vs-memoq-translator-pro

https://www.nimdzi.com/webinar-translation-management-systems-a-comparison/






https://www.proz.com/software-comparison-tool/compare/7-130/memoq-to-SDL%20Trados%20Studio%202019

Activity 2 & 3

Background information for trainees:

Figure 2 The Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas 2018

https://www.nimdzi.com/language-technology-atlas/




Choose a (not yet listed) translation productivity tool (e.g. from the Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas 2018) which you would like to describe in depth and indicate its full name and your name in the list.

TOOL Your NAME

There are some tools’ comparisons – helping to assess what is best for the business: capterra, g2crowd, etc.

Bibliography

The Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas (2018) https://www.nimdzi.com/language-technology-atlas/

Translation productivity tools

Across https://www.across.net/en/CafeTran Espresso https://www.cafetran.com/Déjà Vu http://www.atril.com/Fluency Now https://www.westernstandard.com/Default.aspxGnome https://wiki.gnome.org/Lilt https://lilt.com/Lionbridge https://www.lionbridge.com/de-de/translation-workspaceLokalize https://www.kde.org/applications/development/lokalize/Madcap https://www.madcapsoftware.com/products/lingo/MateCat https://www.matecat.com/maxprograms https://www.maxprograms.com/products/MemoQ https://www.memoq.com/en/MemSource https://cloud.memsource.com/MetaTexis http://www.metatexis.de/MultiTrans https://www.multitranstms.com/OCLanguage http://www.oclanguage.com/OmegaT http://omegat.org/Pootle http://pootle.translatehouse.org/SDL http://www.sdl.com/Smartcat https://www.smartcat.ai/

http://www.sdl.com/

http://pootle.translatehouse.org/

http://omegat.org/

http://www.oclanguage.com/

https://www.multitranstms.com/

http://www.metatexis.de/

https://cloud.memsource.com/

https://www.memoq.com/en/

https://www.maxprograms.com/products/

https://www.matecat.com/

https://www.madcapsoftware.com/products/lingo/

https://www.kde.org/applications/development/lokalize/

https://wiki.gnome.org/

https://www.westernstandard.com/Default.aspx

http://www.atril.com/

https://www.cafetran.com/

https://www.across.net/en/



Smartling https://www.smartling.com/STAR https://www.star-ts.com/technology/Systran http://www.systransoft.com/Terminotix https://terminotix.com/?lang=enTextUnited https://www.textunited.com/Verifika https://e-verifika.com/Virtaal http://virtaal.translatehouse.org/Wordbee http://www.wordbee.com/Wordfast http://www.wordfast.com/XTM Cloud https://xtm-intl.com/

https://xtm-intl.com/

http://www.wordfast.com/

http://www.wordbee.com/

http://virtaal.translatehouse.org/

https://e-verifika.com/

https://www.textunited.com/

https://terminotix.com/?lang=en

http://www.systransoft.com/

https://www.star-ts.com/technology/


WORKSHEET

ACTIVITY 1 WHICH TOOL TO CHOOSE?

Carry out research in order to find out which aspects play a role for or against a specific translation productivity tool in the decision making procedure. Create a list of the aspects by ranking their importance.

Ranking Aspects1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

ACTIVITY 2 A TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOL IN DETAIL

Carry out research and describe in detail the translation productivity tool of your choice according to its aspects. At the end summarize its main possibilities and limitations. Present the main results in whole-class!

Aspects Tool 1:___ (e.g. Memoq)e.g. cost 30 days demonstration version, afterwards € 620/year

(+) Possibilities

(–) Limitations

ACTIVITY 3 WORKFLOW OF TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS


Analyse with your peer the figure below (Fig. 2) and compare the tool you described with the translation workflow illustrated. List and describe the workflow activities covered by the chosen tool’s features.

Workflow phases Tool’s feature description


Figure 3: Translation workflow (© ISO17100, 2015)

Share the results of your discussion with the whole group.


UNIT 3: USE OF TRANSLATION PRODUCTIVITY TOOLS

Learning outcome

After completing this unit you will know how to start working with two translation productivity tools and have an idea about the possibilities and limitations of human and machine translation.


Having a good basis competence in ICT.Learning Environment


Time/Workload

540 min


timeframe1. Webinar -CAT tools

Taking part in webinars

Learning how to start working with common CAT toolsEvaluating their possibilities and limitations

Individual work No separate assessment(Assessment could be linked to the translation request Unit 3 Activity 2)

120 min

2. Translation request

Translation with the help of translation productivity tools and following the translation workflow

Learning how to start realising a translation request using translation productivity tools

Individual work Written feedback from peers & the trainer

60 min

3. Translation commentary

Reflecting and writing commentary about the translation process and result

Initiating and structuring reflection processes abouttranslation

Individual work, presentation and discussion in whole-class


60 min+60 min presentation / feedback

4. Machine translation - evaluation

Guided evaluation of a machine translated text

Learning how to evaluate machine translation

Individual work For feedback see the next activity

50 min

5. Comparison

Comparison of machine

Learning the possibilities and

Individual work,

Feedback from the

40 min+


of machine translations

translations possibilities and limitations

limitations of machine translations

presentation and discussion in whole-class

whole group & trainer

40 min

6. Corpus Compiling and using corpus for translation

Learning how to compile a corpus and evaluating its usefulness

Whole group activity


80 min+30 min



Activity 1

Pym (2012) emphasises the idea of training the trainees to develop their own learning and assessing techniques rather than training them to use specific industry tools which could easily be rendered obsolete by changing circumstances.

In this section trainees are provided with the necessary knowledge and skills to assess any CAT tool from the standpoint of their specific needs.

ISO/IEC 9126-1 (2001) and ISO/IEC 25010 (2011) are used to evaluate software in general.

According to Starlander (2013) in the literature on CAT tool and TM system evaluation, three studies are particularly widely referred to: Höge (2002), Gow (2003) and Rico (2000) showing several ways of interpreting the ISO standards.

Elaborating a prioritized list of context specific requirements and checking if the required features are present in the systems under comparison are discussed in:Gow 2003 Keller 2011Zerfass 2002, 2010;

Evaluation of translation aids should be carried out with reference to the needs of a specific user (in this activity newly graduated freelance translator who wants to buy an adequate TM system).

A step by step evaluation method for TM tools is offered by EAGLES (1999):

1. Why is the evaluation being done?What is the purpose of the evaluation? Do all parties involved have the same understanding of the purpose? What exactly is being evaluated? Is it a system or a system component? A system in isolation or a system in a specific context of use? Where are the boundaries of the system?

2. Elaborate a task modelIdentify all relevant roles and agentsWhat is the system going to be used for?Who will use it? What will they do with it? What are these people like?

3. Define top level quality characteristicsWhat features of the system need to be evaluated? Are they all equally important?

4. Produce detailed requirements for the system under evaluation, on the basis of 2 and 3For each feature which has been identified as important, can a valid and reliable way be found of measuring how the object being evaluated performs with respect to that feature? If not, then the features have to be broken down in a valid way, into sub-attributes which are measurable. This point has to be repeated until a point is reached where the attributes are measurable.

5. Devise the metrics to be applied to the system for the requirements produced under 4.Both measure and method for obtaining that measure have to be defined for each attribute.


For each measurable attribute, what will count as a good score, a satisfactory score or an unsatisfactory score given the task model (2)? Where are the cut off points?Usually, an attribute has more than one sub-attributes. How are the values of the different sub-attributes combined to a value for the mother node in order to reflect their relative importance (again given the task model)?

6. Design the execution of the evaluation:Develop test materials to support the testing of the object.Who will actually carry out the different measurements? When? In what circumstances? What form will the end result take?

7. Execute the evaluation:Make measurement.Compare with the previously determined satisfaction ratings.Summarize the results in an evaluation report, cf. point 1.

The practical implementation of the following steps can be found in form of a concrete scenario (a translation agency is considering acquiring a terminology management tool, in order to gain better efficiency and consistency in the terminology which they translate) here: EAGLES (1999) https://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/eagles/ewg99/7steps.html

A quicker evaluation method for choosing the most appropriate tool can be found online on nimdzi.

Following TMS types are included: Web & Software Middleware Machine Translation Business Management Term/memory Banks Online Repositories Technical documentation Marketing Automation Support Etc.

Bibliography

EAGLES Evaluation Working Group (1999) ‘The EAGLES 7-step recipe’ [online], available: http://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/eagles/ewg99/7steps.html

Gow, F. (2003) Metrics for Evaluating Translation Memory Software (M.A.), University of Ottawa.

Höge, M. (2002) Towards a Framework for the Evaluation of Translators' Aids Systems (PhD), Faculty of Arts, Department of Translation Studies, University of Helsinki.

ISO/IEC 9126-1: Software engineering — Product quality — Part 1: Quality model (2001).

ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering -- Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) -- System and software quality models (2011).

Keller, N. (2011) ‘Translation-Memory-Systeme: Neun auf einen Blick’, Mdü, available: http://www.metatexis.org/reviews/TM-Vergleich-MDUE-2011.pdf

http://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/eagles/ewg99/7steps.html

https://www.nimdzi.com/tms

https://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/eagles/ewg99/7steps.html



Pym, A. (2012) ‘Translation skill-sets in a machine-translation age’, [online], available: http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/training/2012_competence_pym.pdf

Quah, C. K. (2006) Translation and Technology, Hampshire/New York: Palgrave. Macmilla

Rico, C. (2001) ‘Reproducible models for CAT tools evaluation: A user-oriented perspective’, Proceedings of the Twenty-third International Conference on Translating and the Computer, London. Aslib.

Starlander, M. & Vázquez, L. M. (2013) ‘Training translation students to evaluate CAT tools using Eagles: a case study’ In Aslib: Translating and the Computer 35. Londres (Royaume Uni)

Zerfaβ, A. (2002) ‘Comparing Basic Features of TM Tools’, Multilingual Computing & Technology, 13 (7), 11-14.

Zerfaβ, A. (2010) MemoQ 4, Multilingual Computing & Technology, 21 (4), 14-17.

Activity 2

A possible solution:

German HungarianTRÄGER DER EL-MOTION 2019

PARTNERSPONSOREN 2019EL-MOTION 2019

Jahresauftakt, Netzwerkevent und Branchentreff:

der 9. österreichische Fachkongress rund um “E-Mobilität für KMU und

kommunale Anwender”.EL-MOTION+FC 2019

Flotten- und Nutzfahrzeuge – Einsatz der eMobilität in der Logistik, in Kommunen

sowie im Flotten- und Agrarbereichwieder mit Begleitausstellung

+FC = ab 2019 liegt der Schwerpunkt auch auf Brennstoffzellen

Fokus:e-Flotten und e-Nutzfahrzeuge mit Batterie

und/oder Brennstoffzelle sowie internationale Logistik-Projekte.

(Transporter, LKW, Busse, Kommunal- und Baufahrzeuge, Traktoren, Agrar-Schlepper,

Lokomotiven, Binnenschiffe )30. bis 31. Jänner 2019! Merken Sie sich

diesen Termin vor!2018 durften wir über 370 Teilnehmer

begrüßen und erwarten 2019 erstmals über 400 Vertreter aus Wirtschaft und Kommunen.

Themenschwerpunkte der Konferenz: Technologische Entwicklungen & Neues am

Nutzfahrzeugmarkt

EL-MOTION 2019 - FŐ TÁMOGATÓINKTOVÁBBI TÁMOGATÓINK 2019

EL-MOTION 2019Új esztendő, hálózatépítő és szakmai

találkozó:

a kilencedik alkalommal megrendezésre kerülő kongresszus fő témája az „Elektromobilitás KKV-

k (kis- és középvállalkozások) valamint kommunális felhasználók

számára.”EL-MOTION+FC 2019Gépjárműflotta és

haszongépjárművek – Az elektromobilitás alkalmazása

logisztikai, kommunális és mezőgazdasági szektorokban

valamint gépjárműflotta eseténismételten kiállítás kíséretében

+FC = 2019-től hangsúly kerül az üzemanyagcella témakörére is

Fókuszban:elektromos gépjárműflották és

elektromos haszongépjárművek akkumulátorral és/vagy

üzemanyagcellával, valamint nemzetközi logisztikai projektek.

(Szállító és tehergépjárművek, buszok, kommunális és építőipari járművek, traktorok, mezőgazdasági vontatók,

mozdonyok, folyami hajók)



Batterie & Brennstoffzelle

Speichersysteme & betriebliches Energiemanagement

Infrastruktur & Roaming & Versorgungskonzepte

Fallbeispiele aus dem betrieblichen Alltagseinsatz

„Kurzstrecke“ bis „Langstrecke“, Multimodalität

Handlungsoptionen für Sonderbereiche wie Landwirtschaft, Nebenbahnen,

BinnenschifffahrtSeminare/Workshops der EL-MOTION

Akademie an den Tagen vor (29.1.2019) und nach (1.2.2019) der Konferenz :

– ÖPNV Umbau von Dieselbus auf E-Bus, – eGeschäftsmodelle für Autohäuser, – Überblick

und Errichtung von Ladestationen, – Geschäftsmodell grüner Wasserstoff

Weitere Informationen zum Kongressprogramm sind in Kürze hier auf www.elmotion.at abrufbar oder per

Newsletter schon im Vorfeld (Anmeldung zum Newsletter siehe unten).Sollten Sie Fragen haben

bzw. Ausstellungsflächen oder Sponsor-Pakete buchen wollen, können Sie sich

jederzeit gerne an uns wenden.office(at)elmotion.at

URL

2019. január 30-31. Jegyezze fel a dátumot!

2018-ban több mint 370 résztvevőt üdvözölhettünk. A 2019-es

rendezvényre, első ízben, több mint 400 érdeklődőre számítunk a gazdasági valamint kommunális szektorból.A konferencia fő témakörei:

Technológiai fejlesztések és újdonságok a haszongépjárművek piacán

Akkumulátorok és üzemanyagcellák

Energiatároló rendszerek & üzemi energiagazdálkodás

Infrastruktúra & roaming & fenntarthatóság

Példák a mindennapi vállalati életből

„Akár rövid kiruccanás, akár hosszú út...” - Multimodalitás

Kereskedelmi lehetőségek speciális területeken: mezőgazdaság, vasúti

hálózatok mellékvonalai, folyami hajózás Az EL-MOTION Akadémia által

szervezett szemináriumok/workshopok a konferencia előtt (2019. január 29.) és

után (2019. február 1.) : – A nyilvános tömegközlekedés

átszervezése: dízel üzemű autóbuszok helyett elektromos buszok, – e-üzleti

modellek autó szalonok számára, – töltő készülékek áttekintése és telepítése, – a

„zöld hidrogén” üzleti modellje További információ a kongresszus

programjáról: hamarosan elérhető lesz a www.elmotion.at linken illetve

hírlevelünkben még korábban tájékozódhatnak a részletes programokról (iratkozzon fel hírlevelünkre az oldal alján).

Forduljon hozzánk bizalommal, ha bármilyen kérdése van, legyen szó akár egy kiállítási helyről, akár a részvételi

csomagokról.office(at)elmotion.at

Activity 3

Writing translation commentary according to certain methodological guidelines gives trainees the skills to ground strategies in an organised way and to rationalise their own translation process.

http://www.elmotion.at/

http://elmotion.at/akademie/



http://elmotion.at/






Trainees usually do not know how to justify their translation decisions and how to lay the foundations for their arguments in an organised fashion. They usually argue with following statements: “it sounds better”, „I found it in the dictionary”, “I don’t think that’s the way it’s said...”, etc.

According to García Álvarez (2007) following aspects should be considered by writing a translation commentary:

1. Translation instructions of the commission (translation norms, textual norms, etc.) 2. The macro-purpose sought with the TT (possible differences with respect to the macro-purpose of the ST) 3. Ideological, cultural and informative considerations and/or differences between the receptors of the TT and the ST 4. Textual conventions of the TT (norms according to its typology, what it allows and what it doesn’t, differences with those of the ST, etc.) 5. Possible defects in the ST 6. Date and place of TT publication (possible temporal/situational differences with the ST if applicable) 7. Possible problems in expression and any other types of problems bound up with the intentionality of the TT, and possible differences in relation to the intentions of the ST (persuasive, informative, directive, instructive, expressive) 8. Textual structure of the TT in relation to the ST (topic-centred, main act-centred, mixed structure, etc.) 9. Text acts vs. speech acts of both texts (according to the maxims and conventions established by each culture) 10. Functional relations of utterances in both texts (including possible omissions, extensions, paraphrase, etc., and problems related to the specific degree of explication and implication necessary to express the informativity of the TT, keeping in mind the principles of economy and relevance) 11. Terminology: pragmatic-cognitive conceptual similarities and differences between both communicative situations and based on the differences between receptors (exotisation, domestication; prototype semantics; metaphoric, metonymic and image-schematic mappings; scripts; lexical categories according to the translation instructions, etc.) 12. Stylistic issues and problems in the TT (linguistic register, jargon, problems related to field, mode and tone/tenor, etc.) 13. Cohesion in the TT: problems with collocations, punctuation, suprasegmental features, referential relations of form and meaning between sentences, theme-rheme structure, etc. 14. Photos or other non-verbal elements, photo captions and typographical elements in the TT (possible differences with those of the ST) 15. Consulting dictionaries, encyclopaedias, parallel texts, databases, informants, etc. 16. Negotiations with the translation client and other determining factors in the process 17. Time allotted for completing the translation 18. Other considerations (e.g. arguments based on declarative knowledge: translation studies, interdisciplinary theories, etc.)


19. Similarities and differences between both texts (e.g. according to Beaugrande & Dressler’s (1981) seven textuality criteria: situationality, intentionality, acceptability, intertextuality, informativity, coherence and cohesion.

Bibliography

García Álvarez, A. M. (2007) Evaluating Students' Translation Process in Specialised Translation: Translation Commentary In The Journal of Specialised Translation, 7, 139-163 https://www.jostrans.org/issue07/art_alvarez.php

Activity 4 & 5

Bibliography

https://www.bing.com/translator https://translate.yandex.com/https://translate.google.com/?hl=de

Machine translations:

https://translate.google.com/?hl=de

https://translate.yandex.com/

https://www.bing.com/translator

https://www.jostrans.org/issue07/art_alvarez.php


MT - YANDEX Translate MT - Microsoft Translator MT - Google TranslatorEMOBILITY-FORUM 2018Konferenz und Ausstellung für elektrische Mobilität-trendsDer Veranstalter des Programms behält sich das Recht vor, änderungen vorzunehmen.[Baum] - Bestätigung.PROGRAMMDer Veranstalter des Programms behält sich das Recht vor, änderungen vorzunehmen.Zeitplan 12: 00-13: 00 Veranstaltung 2018.09.19.REGISTRIERUNG DES FORUMSPlatz BUDAPEST WAL-1. ETAGEZeitplan 13: 00-13:30 Veranstaltung 2018.09.19.ERÖFFNUNG DER KONFERENZKEYNOTEKEYNOTE LECTURE EINE EUROPÄISCHE VISION FÜR DIE ELEKTROMOBILITÄTKaffeepauseDISKUSSION AM RUNDEN TISCHPODIUMSDISKUSSION: MITTEL-UND OSTEUROPA IM FOKUSKaffeepauseKEYNOTE-EU AKTUELLER STAND IN FAKTENPODIUMSDISKUSSION: UNGARNS WICHTIGSTE AKTEUREWETTENREGISTRIERUNG DES FORUMSdankeKEYNOTE-ELEKTROMOBILITÄT IN BUDAPEST IM FOKUSSMART CITY ENTWICKLUNGENKaffeepausePANEL-INNOVATION UND NEUE STANDARDSPANEL B - GESCHÄFTSMODELLE UND DIE ROLLE DER MARKTBETEILIGTENPANEL B-DIE WICHTIGSTEN FAKTOREN UND HINDERNISSE FÜR DEN ELEKTRISCHEN SCHALTERPANEL A-ELEKTROMOBILITÄT UND INTELLIGENTE LÖSUNGEN FÜR DIE URBANE UMWELTMittagspausePLENARSITZUNG-TECHNOLOGIE: DER KREIS SIEPODIUMSDISKUSSION: INTERNATIONALES LADENETZ, ROAMING-DIENSTEZUSAMMENFASSUNG UND ABSCHLUSS

EMobility FORUM 2018Konferenz und Ausstellung zu den Trends der ElektromobilitätDer ProjektTräger behält sich das Recht vor, das Programm zu ändern.[Baum]-bei der Bestätigung.ProgrammDer ProjektTräger behält sich das Recht vor, das Programm zu ändern.Fahrplan 12:00-13:00 Event 2018.09.19.Forums AnmeldungPlace BUDAPEST Wal-1. BodenFahrplan 13:00-13:30 Event 2018.09.19.Offene KonferenzKeynoteKeynote-Vortrag-europäische Vision der ElektromobilitätKaffeepauseDiskussionsRunde am Runden TischPODIUMSdiskussion: Fokus in Mittel-und OsteuropaKaffeepauseKEYNOTE-EU-aktueller STATUS IN FaktenPodiumsdiskussion: die wichtigsten Betreiber in UngarnWetteForums AnmeldungGrußKeynote-Fokus auf Elektromobilität in BudapestSMART CITY EnhancementKaffeepausePANEL A-Innovation und neue StandardsPANEL B-Geschäftsmodelle und Rolle der MarktakteurePANEL B-die Schlüsselfaktoren und Hindernisse für die elektrische SchaltungPANEL A-Elektromobilität und clevere Lösungen im urbanen UmfeldMittagspausePlenarsitzungs Technik: KreiselPodiumsdiskussion: Internationale Gebühren Netze, ROAMING-DiensteZusammenFassung und Schließung

EMOBILITY FORUM 2018Konferenz und Ausstellung zu Trends in der ElektromobilitätDer Veranstalter behält sich das Recht vor, das Programm zu ändern.[Fa] - Bestätigung.PROGRAMMDer Veranstalter behält sich das Recht vor, das Programm zu ändern.Zeitplan 12:00 - 13:00 Veranstaltung 2018.09.19.FORUM REGISTRIERENPlatz BUDAPEST BALNA - 1. EMELETZeitplan 13:00 - 13:30 Veranstaltung 2018.09.19.Eröffnung der KonferenzKEYNOTELEBENSLANGES LERNEN - EUROPÄISCHE ZUKUNFT DER ELEKTRIZITÄTCOFFEE BREAKSUCHE INHALTSVERZEICHNISPANEL - LIFE: FOKUS ZENTRAL-OSTEUROPACOFFEE BREAKKEYNOTE - EU-AKTUELLER STATUS IN FAKTENPANEL REVIEW: DIE WICHTIGSTEN MARKTAKTOREN IN UNGARNEMPFANGFORUM REGISTRIERENWILLKOMMENLektor - zentrale Elektrizität in BudapestSMART CITY ENTWICKLUNGENCOFFEE BREAKPANEL A - INNOVATION UND NEUE STANDARDSPANEL B - ROLLE VON GESCHÄFTSMODELLEN UND MARKT INTERESSIERTEN PARTEIENPANEL B - DIE WICHTIGSTEN FAKTOREN UND SCHÄDEN FÜR DIE ELEKTRISCHE VERSCHIEBUNGPANEL A - ELEKTRISCHE MOBILITÄT UND KLARE LÖSUNGEN IN DER NATÜRLICHEN UMGEBUNGMITTAGSPAUSEPLENARSITZUNG - TECHNIK: KREISELPODIUMSDISKUSSION: INTERNATIONALE DACHNETZWERKE, ROAMINGDIENSTEZUSAMMENFASSUNG UND VERSCHLUSS

URL



Acivity 5

Short description of SMT, NMT and hybrid systems:

Statistical Machine Translation (SMT) has been the dominant translation paradigm for decades. Although effective, statistical machine translation methods suffered from a narrow focus on the phrases being translated, losing the broader nature of the target text. The hard focus on data-driven approaches also meant that methods may have ignored important syntax distinctions known by linguists.

Neural machine translation (NMT) is the use of neural network models to learn a statistical model for machine translation. Unlike the traditional phrase-based translation system which consists of many small sub-components that are tuned separately, neural machine translation attempts to build and train a single, large neural network that reads a sentence and outputs a correct translation.Although effective, the neural machine translation systems still suffer some issues, such as scaling to larger vocabularies of words and the slow speed of training the models. There are the current areas of focus for large production neural translation systems, such as the Google system.

A “hybrid” method combines both techniques to create a desired result. The efficacy of each depends on a number of factors, including the languages used and available linguistic resources, or example text.

Comparing errors of both systems according to the Multidimensional Quality Metrics framework (MQM):

- Accuracy (accuracy): Accuracy issues address the relationship of the target text to the source text and can be assessed only by considering this relationship Issue types: addition, omission, mistranslation, etc.- Design (design): Design includes issues related to the physical presentation of text, typically in a “rich text” or “markup” environment.Issue types: formatting, length, mark-up, etc.- Fluency (fluency): Fluency includes those issues about the linguistic “well-formedness” of the text that can be assessed without regard to whether the text is a translation or not. Most Fluency issues apply equally to source and target texts.Issue types: cohesion, grammar, inconsistency, etc.- Internationalization (internationalization): Internationalization covers areas related to the preparation of the source content for subsequent translation or localization. - Locale convention (locale-convention): Issues in Locale convention relate to the formal compliance of content with locale-specific conventions, such as use of proper number formats. If content is otherwise correctly translated and fluent but violates specific locale expectations (as defined in the translation specifications), it is addressed in this dimension. This dimension does not cover issues related to whether the content itself is appropriate for the locale (these issues are covered under Verity (verity).- Style (style): Style issues relate to what is commonly known as “Style”, defined both formally (in style guides) and informally (e.g., a “light style” or an “engaging style”). These issues are closely related to Fluency (fluency), but are often treated separately by tools and quality processes and so are grouped as a separate dimension in MQM.Issue types: unidiomatic, inconsistent style, awkward, etc.- Terminology (terminology): Terminology issues relate to the use of domain- or organization-specific terminology (i.e., the use of words to relate to specific concepts not considered part of general language).- Verity (verity): Verity issues relate to the suitability of content for the target locale and audience. They do not relate to fluency or accuracy since content may be fluently written and accurately translated and still be inappropriate for the target locale or audience.


- Compatibility (Deprecated) (compatibility): The Compatibility dimension includes issues taken from legacy metrics that are not considered appropriate for general use in MQM (because they are related to areas not covered by MQM, such as deadlines, software functionality, or physical production). They are included only for compatibility with these older metrics and should not be used for new MQM metrics.Issue types: completeness, suitability, legal requirements, etc.- Other (other): This dimension is used for issues which cannot be otherwise classified into a dimension of MQM. In cases where an unforeseen issue can be classified as belonging to a dimension, it should be classified in that dimension under the top level or using a custom issue type.

Bibliography

Aljoscha Burchardt (2017) Comparing Errors: Neural MT vs. Traditional Phrase-based and Rule-based MT https://www.gala-global.org/publications/comparing-errors-neural-mt-vs-traditional-phrase-based-and-rule-based-mt

Aljoscha Burchardt, Vivien Macketanz, Jon Dehdari, Georg Heigold, Jan-Thorsten Peter and Philip Williams (2017). A Linguistic Evaluation of Rule-based, Phrase-based, and Neural MT Engines. In Proceedings of EAMT 2017, Prague, Czech Republic.

Arle Richard Lommel, Aljoscha Burchardt, Hans Uszkoreit (2014) Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM): A Framework for Declaring and Describing Translation Quality Metrics in: Attila Görög, Pilar Sánchez-Gijón (eds.): 3 Tradumàtica: tecnologies de la traducció volume 0 number 12, Pages 455-463 Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM): http://www.qt21.eu/mqm-definition/definition-2015-06-16.html

https://machinelearningmastery.com/introduction-neural-machine-translation/

Dean, J. (2016) Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144

Neural Machine Translation: How Artificial Intelligence Works When Translating Language (2017): http://content.lionbridge.com/neural-machine-translation-artificial-intelligence-works-multilingual-communication/

http://daily.unitedlanguagegroup.com/stories/editorials/statistical-vs-neural-machine-translation

Activity 6

Corpora and concordance software provide a tool to facilitate the translation process, giving translators the opportunity to understand the languages involved and to develop their awareness of the relationships between possible equivalents. (Yingying 2018)

Observing 1) linguistic characteristics, 2) typical structures and 3) text-type-specific formulations

in parallel bilingual corpora enables trainees to1) make better choices about translation transfer types 2) provide explanations for appropriateness of certain solutions to problems


http://content.lionbridge.com/neural-machine-translation-artificial-intelligence-works-multilingual-communication/


https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144


http://www.qt21.eu/mqm-definition/definition-2015-06-16.html

https://www.gala-global.org/publications/comparing-errors-neural-mt-vs-traditional-phrase-based-and-rule-based-mt



3) deepen their knowledge of language for specific purposes.

Steps:

All texts should be collected from websites and converted to text format .txt with the AntFile Converter software (a freeware tool to convert PDF and Word files into plain text for use in corpus tools like AntConc).

Figure 4 AntFile Converter designed by Laurence Anthony Screenshot

AntConc - a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for concordancing and text analysis could be used for this activity:

Figure 5 AntConc Concordance designed by Laurence Anthony Screenshot

http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/

http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antfileconverter/


AntConc Concordance http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/

AntFile Converter http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antfileconverter/

Yingying Ding (2018) Specialized Translation Teaching Strategies: A Corpus-Based Approach World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences Vol:12, No:5

Zanettin, Federico. (2001) “Swimming in words: Corpora, translation, and language learning”, in Learning with Corpora. In G. Aston, Houston, TX: Athelstan, pp. 177-197.




WORKSHEETACTIVITY 1 WEBINAR - CAT TOOLS

Take part in the webinar “Getting started with memoQ for translators” or watch its recorded version.

AND

Take part in the webinar “A beginner’s guide to SDL Trados Studio 2017” or watch its recorded version.

Which tool would you use (MemoQ, Trados, something else…) as a future freelance translator? Why? Write a short evaluation about one of the tools according to the guidelines of Starlander & Vázquez (2013).

MemoQ Trados ____________+ + +

- - -

Discuss the results in small groups (2-3)!

http://www.sdl.com/video/a-beginners-guide-to-sdl-trados-studio-2017-part-1/115487/

https://www.memoq.com/en/recorded-webinars


ACTIVITY 2 TRANSLATION REQUEST

A customer needs the following text translated into Hungarian. Follow the workflow (Unit 2 Activity 3) and create the required translation by using appropriate tools.

German HungarianTRÄGER DER EL-MOTION 2019

PARTNERSPONSOREN 2019EL-MOTION 2019

Jahresauftakt, Netzwerkevent und Branchentreff:

der 9. österreichische Fachkongress rund um “E-Mobilität für KMU und

kommunale Anwender”.EL-MOTION+FC 2019

Flotten- und Nutzfahrzeuge – Einsatz der eMobilität in der Logistik, in

Kommunen sowie im Flotten- und Agrarbereich

wieder mit Begleitausstellung+FC = ab 2019 liegt der Schwerpunkt auch auf Brennstoffzellen

Fokus:e-Flotten und e-Nutzfahrzeuge mit

Batterie und/oder Brennstoffzelle sowie internationale Logistik-Projekte.

(Transporter, LKW, Busse, Kommunal- und Baufahrzeuge, Traktoren, Agrar-

Schlepper, Lokomotiven, Binnenschiffe )30. bis 31. Jänner 2019! Merken Sie

sich diesen Termin vor!2018 durften wir über 370 Teilnehmer begrüßen und erwarten 2019 erstmals über 400 Vertreter aus Wirtschaft und

Kommunen.Themenschwerpunkte der Konferenz:

Technologische Entwicklungen & Neues am Nutzfahrzeugmarkt

Batterie & Brennstoffzelle Speichersysteme & betriebliches

Energiemanagement Infrastruktur & Roaming &

Versorgungskonzepte Fallbeispiele aus dem betrieblichen

Alltagseinsatz „Kurzstrecke“ bis „Langstrecke“,

Multimodalität Handlungsoptionen für Sonderbereiche

wie Landwirtschaft, Nebenbahnen,


BinnenschifffahrtSeminare/Workshops der EL-MOTION

Akademie an den Tagen vor (29.1.2019) und nach (1.2.2019) der Konferenz :

– ÖPNV Umbau von Dieselbus auf E-Bus, – eGeschäftsmodelle für Autohäuser, –

Überblick und Errichtung von Ladestationen, – Geschäftsmodell grüner

Wasserstoff Weitere Informationen zum

Kongressprogramm sind in Kürze hier auf www.elmotion.at abrufbar oder per

Newsletter schon im Vorfeld (Anmeldung zum Newsletter siehe unten).

Sollten Sie Fragen haben bzw. Ausstellungsflächen oder Sponsor-Pakete buchen wollen, können Sie sich

jederzeit gerne an uns wenden.office(at)elmotion.at

URL

ACTIVITY 3 TRANSLATION COMMENTARY

What kind of problems did you face? Write a general descriptive translation commentary according to the guideline of García Álvarez (2007). Present and discuss your commentary in whole-class!


http://elmotion.at/






ACTIVITY 4 MACHINE TRANSLATION - EVALUATION

For the following translation request use ONE of the online available machine translation tools. Evaluate the result according to the M ultidimensional Quality Metrics framework!

Source text Machine-translated textEMOBILITY FORUM 2018Konferencia és kiállítás az elektromobilitás trendjeirőlA szervező a programváltozás jogát fenntartja.[FA] - Megerősítés alatt.PROGRAMA szervező a programváltozás jogát fenntartja.schedule 12:00 - 13:00 event 2018.09.19.FORUM REGISZTRÁCIÓplace BUDAPEST BÁLNA - 1. EMELETschedule 13:00 - 13:30 event 2018.09.19.KONFERENCIA MEGNYITÁSAVITAINDÍTÓVITAINDÍTÓ ELŐADÁS - EURÓPAI JÖVŐKÉP AZ ELEKTROMOBILITÁSRÓLKÁVÉSZÜNETKEREKASZTAL BESZÉLGETÉSPANEL - VITA: FÓKUSZBAN KÖZÉP-KELET-EURÓPAKÁVÉSZÜNETKEYNOTE - EU CURRENT STATUS IN FACTSPANELBESZÉLGETÉS: MAGYARORSZÁG FŐ PIACI SZEREPLŐIFOGADÁSFORUM REGISZTRÁCIÓKÖSZÖNTŐVITAINDÍTÓ - KÖZÉPPONTBAN AZ ELEKTROMOBILITÁS BUDAPESTENSMART CITY FEJLESZTÉSEKKÁVÉSZÜNETPANEL A - INNOVÁCIÓ ÉS ÚJ STANDARDOKPANEL B - ÜZLETI MODELLEK ÉS A PIACI ÉRDEKELTEK SZEREPEPANEL B - A LEGFONTOSABB TÉNYEZŐK ÉS AKADÁLYOK AZ ELEKTROMOS VÁLTÁSHOZPANEL A - ELEKTROMOBILITÁS ÉS OKOS MEGOLDÁSOK A VÁROSI KÖRNYEZETBENEBÉDSZÜNETPLENÁRIS ÜLÉS - TECHNOLÓGIA: KREISELPANELBESZÉLGETÉS: NEMZETKÖZI TÖLTŐHÁLÓZATOK, ROAMING



SZOLGÁLTATÁSOKÖSSZEGZÉS ÉS ZÁRÁSURL

ACTIVITY 5 COMPARISON OF MACHINE TRANSLATIONS

Compare the results of your evaluation with two other peers who used another tools! Write down the main possibilities (+) and limitations (-) of the tested tools.

YANDEX Translate Microsoft Translator Google Translator+ + +

- - -

Would you use machine translation tools as a freelance translator? Which one and why? Present the main results in whole-class!

ACTIVITY 6 CORPUS

An LSP needs a bilingual (HU and DE) specialized corpus of conference / marketing materials in the field of e-mobility (about 50,000 words altogether). With the help of an appropriate tool compile the corpus.

Can you make use of it for the translations above (activity 2 & 4)? How?

https://www.emobilityforum.hu/


List of figuresFigure 1 The future according to FIT (EUATC and Hermes Traducciones, 2017).....................................8Figure 2 The Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas 2018..........................................................................14Figure 3: Translation workflow (© ISO17100, 2015)...............................................................................19Figure 4 AntFile Converter designed by Laurence Anthony Screenshot.................................................31Figure 5 AntConc Concordance designed by Laurence Anthony Screenshot.........................................32

List of referencesAbrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015) Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275-314.

Abranyi, H. (2016) Translation Environment Tools in Horváth, I. eds. The Modern Translator and Interpreter, 168-182 http://www.eltereader.hu/media/2016/04/HorvathTheModernTranslator.pdf

Alcina, A. (2008): Translation technologies: scope, tools and resouces. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233657002_Translation_technologies_Scope_tools_and_resources

Aljoscha Burchardt (2017) Comparing Errors: Neural MT vs. Traditional Phrase-based and Rule-based MT https://www.gala-global.org/publications/comparing-errors-neural-mt-vs-traditional-phrase-based-and-rule-based-mt

Aljoscha Burchardt, Vivien Macketanz, Jon Dehdari, Georg Heigold, Jan-Thorsten Peter and Philip Williams (2017). A Linguistic Evaluation of Rule-based, Phrase-based, and Neural MT Engines. In Proceedings of EAMT 2017, Prague, Czech Republic.

Arle Richard Lommel, Aljoscha Burchardt, Hans Uszkoreit (2014) Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM): A Framework for Declaring and Describing Translation Quality Metrics in: Attila Görög, Pilar Sánchez-Gijón (eds.): 3 Tradumàtica: tecnologies de la traducció volume 0 number 12, Pages 455-463

Biau, G., J. R. (2006) ‘Teaching electronic tools for translators online’, in Pym, A., Perekrestenko, A. and Starink, B., eds., Translation Technology and its Teaching (with much mention of localization), Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 86-95.

Biau, G., J. R. & Pym, A (2006) Technology and translation (pedagogical overview) in Pym, A., Perekrestenko, A. and Starink, B., eds., Translation Technology and its Teaching (with much mention of localization), Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 5-19.

Dean, J. (2016) Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144

https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08144





http://www.eltereader.hu/media/2016/04/HorvathTheModernTranslator.pdf


Doherty, S., & Moorkens, J. (2013) ‘Investigating the experience of translation technology labs: pedagogical implications’. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 19, 122–136.

Doherty, S. (2016) The Impact of Translation Technologies on the Process and Product of Translation In: International Journal of Communication 10, 947–969

Doherty, S., & Moorkens, J. (2013) ‘Investigating the experience of translation technology labs: pedagogical implications’. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 19, 122–136. FEMTI (2003) ‘FEMTI - a Framework for the Evaluation of Machine Translation in ISLE’: http://www.isi.edu/natural-language/mteval/

EAGLES Evaluation Working Group (1999) ‘The EAGLES 7-step recipe’ [online], available: http://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/eagles/ewg99/7steps.html

EUATC and Hermes Traducciones, 2017

Fernández-Parra, M. (2009) The Workflow of Computer-Assisted Translation Tools in Specialised Translation in Reconceptualizing LSP: Online proceedings of the XVII European LSP Symposium

Freigang, J. (2009). “Technologies for translation”. http://eventi.dipintra.it/tetra/convegni/tetra_1/allegati/freigang.pdf >.

García Álvarez, A. M. (2007) Evaluating Students' Translation Process in Specialised Translation: Translation Commentary In The Journal of Specialised Translation, 7, 139-163 https://www.jostrans.org/issue07/art_alvarez.php

Gow, F. (2003) Metrics for Evaluating Translation Memory Software (M.A.), University of Ottawa.

Guillardeau, S. (2009) Freie Translation Memory Systeme für die Übersetzungspraxis: Ein kritischer Vergleich. Masterthesis: http://www.omegat.org/resources/DA_Guillardeau.pdf

Hagen, J. (2011) Ein funktioneller Vergleich: trados und memoQ. Masterthesis: http://othes.univie.ac.at/17506/1/2011-12-12_0515217.pdf

ISO 17100:2015 Translation services — Requirements for translation services

ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering -- Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) -- System and software quality models (2011).

ISO/IEC 9126-1: Software engineering — Product quality — Part 1: Quality model (2001).

ISLE Project (2007) ‘International Standards for Language Engineering, Evaluation Working Group’: http://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/isle/ewg.html

Jaatinen, H., & Jääskeläinen, R. (2006). ‘Introducing IT in translator training: Experiences from the COLC project’, in Pym, A., Perekrestenko, A. and Starink, B., eds., Translation Technology and its Teaching (with much mention of localization), Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 83-88.

http://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/isle/ewg.html

http://othes.univie.ac.at/17506/1/2011-12-12_0515217.pdf

http://www.omegat.org/resources/DA_Guillardeau.pdf


http://eventi.dipintra.it/tetra/convegni/tetra_1/allegati/freigang.pdf

http://www.issco.unige.ch/en/research/projects/eagles/ewg99/7steps.html

http://www.isi.edu/natural-language/mteval/


Keller, N. (2011) ‘Translation-Memory-Systeme: Neun auf einen Blick’, Mdü: http://www.metatexis.org/reviews/TM-Vergleich-MDUE-2011.pdf

Morin, D., Thomas, J. D. E., & Saadé, R. G.(2015) Fostering problem-solving in a virtual environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 339-362.

Muegge, U. (2013) ‘Teaching computer-assisted translation in the 21st century’, in Ende, A., Herlod, S and Weilandt, eds., Alles hängt mit allem zusammen: Translatologische Interdependenzen. Festschrift für Peter A. Schmitt, Berlin: Frank & Timme, 137-146.

Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM): http://www.qt21.eu/mqm-definition/definition-2015-06-16.htmlNeural Machine Translation: How Artificial Intelligence Works When Translating Language (2017): http://content.lionbridge.com/neural-machine-translation-artificial-intelligence-works-multilingual-communication/

Pitar, M. (2016) The Impact of New Technologies on Specialised Translation In: Dejica, D., Hansen, G., Sandrini, P., Para, I. eds. Language in the digital era: Challenges and Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter, 60-70.

Popovic, A. (2012) Wie nützlich sind Translation-Memory-Systeme bei der Übersetzung von Fachtexten? Masterthesis: http://othes.univie.ac.at/23538/1/2012-10-25_0606424.pdf

Pym, A., Perekrestenko, A. and Starink, B., eds., Translation Technology and its Teaching (with much mention of localization), Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili.

Pym, A. & Torres-Simón, E. (2015) Designing a course in Translation Studies to respond to students’ questions, In The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 10/2, 183-203.

Pym, A. (2006) ‘Asymmetries in the teaching of translation technology’, in Pym, A., Perekrestenko, A. and Starink, B., eds., Translation Technology and its Teaching (with much mention of localization), Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 113-124.

Pym, A. (2012) ‘Translation skill-sets in a machine-translation age’: http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/training/2012_competence_pym.pdf

Quah, C. K. (2006) Translation and Technology, Hampshire/New York: Palgrave. Macmillan.

Rico, C. (2001) ‘Reproducible models for CAT tools evaluation: A user-oriented perspective’, Proceedings of the Twenty-third International Conference on Translating and the Computer, London. Aslib.

Slator: https://slator.com/sponsored-content/important-trends-translation-technology-2018/

Starlander, M. & Vázquez, L. M. (2013) ‘Training translation students to evaluate CAT tools using Eagles: a case study’ In Aslib: Translating and the Computer 35. Londres (Royaume Uni)

The Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas (2018) https://www.nimdzi.com/language-technology-atlas/


https://slator.com/sponsored-content/important-trends-translation-technology-2018/

http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/training/2012_competence_pym.pdf

http://othes.univie.ac.at/23538/1/2012-10-25_0606424.pdf




http://www.metatexis.org/reviews/TM-Vergleich-MDUE-2011.pdf


Trend Report 2018 https://memoqtrendreport.com/about/

Yingying Ding (2018) Specialized Translation Teaching Strategies: A Corpus-Based Approach World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences Vol:12, No:5

Zanettin, Federico. (2001) “Swimming in words: Corpora, translation, and language learning”, in Learning with Corpora. In G. Aston, Houston, TX: Athelstan, pp. 177-197.

Zerfaβ, A. (2002) ‘Comparing Basic Features of TM Tools’, Multilingual Computing & Technology, 13 (7), 11-14.

Zerfaβ, A. (2010) MemoQ 4, Multilingual Computing & Technology, 21 (4), 14-17.

Zetzsche, J. (2008). “A Maze of TEnTs”. ATA Chronicle, July 2008. Alexandria: ATA. 47.

Links


http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/translate-toolkit/en/latest/formats/

http://www.dicits.com/en/technologie/faq/wie-funktionieren-tm-systeme.html

http://www.metatexis.org/reviews/TM-Vergleich_Version_300805.pdf

http://www.sdltrados.com/solutions/translation-memory/

http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/rumpel/TMS-ILS-0503/TMS-PL/tms-de/

http://www.universitas.org/uploads/media/Universitas_115_web.pdf







https://www.capterra.com/translation-management-software/compare/162762-151746/memoQ-vs-SDL-

Trados-Studio




https://www.proz.com/software-comparison-tool/compare/7-130/memoq-to-SDL%20Trados%20Studio

%202019

Translation productivity tools















http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/rumpel/TMS-ILS-0503/TMS-PL/tms-de/

http://www.sdltrados.com/solutions/translation-memory/

http://www.metatexis.org/reviews/TM-Vergleich_Version_300805.pdf

http://www.dicits.com/en/technologie/faq/wie-funktionieren-tm-systeme.html

http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/translate-toolkit/en/latest/formats/


https://memoqtrendreport.com/about/


Across https://www.across.net/en/

AntConc Concordance http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/

AntFile Converter http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antfileconverter/

CafeTran Espresso https://www.cafetran.com/

Déjà Vu http://www.atril.com/

Fluency Now https://www.westernstandard.com/Default.aspx

Gnome https://wiki.gnome.org/

Lilt https://lilt.com/

Lionbridge https://www.lionbridge.com/de-de/translation-workspace

Lokalize https://www.kde.org/applications/development/lokalize/

Madcap https://www.madcapsoftware.com/products/lingo/

MateCat https://www.matecat.com/

maxprograms https://www.maxprograms.com/products/

MemoQ https://www.memoq.com/en/

MemSource https://cloud.memsource.com/

MetaTexis http://www.metatexis.de/

MultiTrans https://www.multitranstms.com/

OCLanguage http://www.oclanguage.com/

OmegaT http://omegat.org/

Pootle http://pootle.translatehouse.org/

SDL http://www.sdl.com/

Smartcat https://www.smartcat.ai/

Smartling https://www.smartling.com/

STAR https://www.star-ts.com/technology/

Systran http://www.systransoft.com/

Terminotix https://terminotix.com/?lang=en

TextUnited https://www.textunited.com/

Verifika https://e-verifika.com/

Virtaal http://virtaal.translatehouse.org/

Wordbee http://www.wordbee.com/

Wordfast http://www.wordfast.com/

XTM Cloud https://xtm-intl.com/

https://xtm-intl.com/

http://www.wordfast.com/

http://www.wordbee.com/

http://virtaal.translatehouse.org/

https://e-verifika.com/

https://www.textunited.com/

https://terminotix.com/?lang=en

http://www.systransoft.com/

https://www.star-ts.com/technology/

http://www.sdl.com/

http://pootle.translatehouse.org/

http://omegat.org/

http://www.oclanguage.com/

https://www.multitranstms.com/

http://www.metatexis.de/

https://cloud.memsource.com/

https://www.memoq.com/en/

https://www.maxprograms.com/products/

https://www.matecat.com/

https://www.madcapsoftware.com/products/lingo/

https://www.kde.org/applications/development/lokalize/

https://wiki.gnome.org/

https://www.westernstandard.com/Default.aspx

http://www.atril.com/

https://www.cafetran.com/



https://www.across.net/en/

etransfair.eu technology... · Web viewAll texts should be collected from websites and converted...

Documents

Transcript of etransfair.eu technology... · Web viewAll texts should be collected from websites and converted...