Technology Planning
description
Transcript of Technology Planning
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Technology PlanningTechnology Planning
Andrew Faulkner
inc. some plagiarism from “Our Leader”
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Technology is more than just
‘‘stuff’stuff’Includes: Hardware - ‘stuff’
AlgorithmsTechniquesSoftwareSystems etc....
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Our developments use.....Our developments use.....
Some very new technology – some not even available yet! –
Projected for SKA build time
Need to understand Need to understand
and control and control RISKRISK
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
No!!No!! like stress:
SomeSome is good (for now)
But, too much is BADBAD
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
‘‘Goldilocks’Goldilocks’ RiskRisk
& friends: fallback + upgrade
Tech. Innovation
Better performance
More/new science
e.g wide-area comms data rate:
1Gb 10Gb 100Gb
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Changes Project PhaseChanges Project Phase
Concept: High risk
Development: Understand risk
Build time: Minimised risk
Now
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Controlling RiskControlling Risk
Risk Status assessment - ongoing• Empirical - educated guess
• Formal - structured risk assessment
→ ‘Retiring’ RiskRetiring’ Risk over time
Risk Understanding:• Follow trends – commercial, industrial
• Demonstrators → pathfinders → initial phase
DZB/Jive
SKA
LO FAR
e.g.
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Some Some ‘Formal Technical ‘Formal Technical Readiness’Readiness’ Questions..... Questions.....
1. Has an identical unit been successful operationally in an identical configuration?
2. Has an identical unit been demonstrated on an operationally, but in a different configuration/system architecture?
3. Has an identical unit been mission qualified but not operationally demonstrated?
4. Has a prototype unit been demonstrated in the operational environment?
5. Has a prototype been demonstrated in a relevant environment or surrogate platform?
6. Has a breadboard unit been demonstrated in a relevant environment
7. Has a breadboard unit been demonstrated in a laboratory (controlled) environment?
8. Has analytical and experimental proof-of-concept been demonstrated?
9. Has a concept or application been formulated?
10. Have basic principles been observed and reported?
11. None of the above NASA etc.
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
A few SKADS Risk thoughtsA few SKADS Risk thoughts
• EM simulation MM• System noise – LNA, matching H H →→ MM• Beamforming – analogue & digital HH• Volume manufacturing MM• Signal transport LL• Calibration HH• Post processing HH• RFI suppression MM• Software - System control and processing M M →→ HH
Need to start some retirements...
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
Workshop 2008......Workshop 2008......
• SKADS will be nearing completion .....• Assess risk in our Tasks for final reports and future work,
so:
All Tasks will perform a
StructuredStructuredRisk AssessmentRisk Assessment
Andrew Faulkner2nd SKADS Workshop 10-11 October 2007
And finally.....And finally.....
...new technology & risk is a delicate balance: