Slide 1

Technology and Cognition Just Because We Can, Should We? Minds and Machines

Slide 2

Just Because We Can, Should We? No! Duh!

Slide 3

Just Because We Can, Should We? An Argument Premise 1: If we can, we will Premise 2: If we will, we should Conclusion: If we can, we should

Slide 4

Just Because We Can, Will We? No! Duh!

Slide 5

We Control Technology, Technology does not Control Us We dont feel that we will, or are even more inclined to do something, just because we can. We feel in control. We make the decisions, not the tools, technology, or situation around us. Commonly Believed Corrolary: Technology is not good or bad. It is us who decide whether to use technology in a good or bad way.

Slide 6

The Neutrality of Technology Guns dont kill people, people kill people

Slide 7

However Why do people climb mountains? Because they are there H. Korman "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad man. Lord Acton, British Historian

Slide 8

From: Drone Strikes Reveal A Lost Moral Compass Last year at this time, in preparation for the harvest feast, the children joined their grandmother [] in the field to pick okra. Though often aware of the intimidating drone of these robotic machines overhead, the family, secure in its own sense of innocence, was unprepared for the hellfire that descended on them unexpectedly when a drone fired missile struck them followed swiftly by a second. When the dust and the cries for help subsided, eight relatives, including the children, were found to be wounded and their grandmother [] dead, her body burned and torn beyond recognition.

Slide 9

From: Drone Strikes Reveal A Lost Moral Compass (Contd) There is, I fear, an explanation. A compass has gone askew, the moral compass that when pointing true tells us when our worship of war as a substitute for wise foreign policy and its lethal ever-expanding soulless technology is leading us into a legal, moral, spiritual abyss.

Slide 10

From: Drone Strikes Reveal A Lost Moral Compass (Contd) [J]ust as those poorly plotted maneuvers over our children's heads remind us that we are at war, the senseless murder of a grandmother [] should remind us that [] the horrors we model, condone and justify today are shaping a dystopian future [] where the commitments to human rights and law are quaint, outmoded notions that can be shredded and burned beyond recognition because... well, because we can. Albany Times Union, November 16, 2013Albany Times Union, November 16, 2013

Slide 11

A Sobering Video Baghdad AirStrike July 17, 2007Baghdad AirStrike July 17, 2007 (embedded video)

Slide 12

The Plan I will use cognitive science to make an argument that tools, technology, and the nature of our environment can have an impact on our inclinations to do or not do something.

Slide 13

Traditional, Nave, View of Cognition Cognition SenseAct Environment Agent (Brain) Cognition = f(brain) Perception and Action are mere input to and output from thinking, reasoning, problem solving, and decision-making

Slide 14

Catching a Fly Ball

Slide 15

The World as External Memory Situated Cognition people say that the brain often uses the environment as a kind of external memory. Examples: Taking apart your computer: how do you lay down the pieces to get it back together? Notes you write to yourself Planners, calendars, cellphones, laptops

Slide 16

Copying Blocks Experiment OriginalCopy Bins Task: Subjects have to make a copy of the configuration of blocks on the left by grabbing individual blocks from the bins at the bottom and placing them on the right. Result: after grabbing block from bin, eyes would move to original to check position

Slide 17

Epistemic moves: Moves that are not part of a solution, but help find one Rotating Slamming

Slide 18

No Opposable Thumbs

Slide 19

External Representations VI / XLIV \ ??

Slide 20

The Google Effect

Slide 21

Avatars (or simply characters you control) In a video game, you dont push the button, you jump!

Slide 22

Biological Being We often think the boundary between me and my environment is my skin: Me: heart, lungs, legs, bones, brain, etc. Not Me: clothes, wallet, laptop, glasses, etc. This distinction makes sense if I talk about genetics, diseases, growth, etc.: biology!

Slide 23

Physical Being As a physical being I have: Mass Shape Color These properties allow us to explain and predict things such as: How much weight I add to an airplane How people can recognize me from other people But note: things like clothes, glasses, wallet, are part of me. This is my physical being.

Slide 24

Cognitive Being As a cognitive being, I: See things Remember things Solve problems Make decisions Etc According to situated cognition, I may need to refer to things that are outside of my biological (or physical) being in order to explain those capacities.

Slide 25

Situated View on Cognition Processing SenseAct Environment Cognitive Agent (Brain) Cognition

Slide 26

Using Tools to create a new Cognitive System? Cognitive System A World Cognitive System A Tool World Cognitive System B

Slide 27

Our Best Tool: Language Literacy Numeracy Science Math Logic Language allows us to pass knowledge and skills along to others, through all of space and time. It is a huge part of culture.

Slide 28

Evolution Darwin Wallace Discovered the theory of evolution independently. Coincidence? Did one look over the shoulder of the other? No. Many of the ingredients and basic ideas for evolution were already in place. Darwin and Wallace were both able to put the final pieces in and complete the puzzle. In fact, the history of science and inventions is full of such multiple discovery: it shows that ideas dont originate from a naked brain, letmultiple discovery alone pop up in a brain, but instead gradually evolve in the public domain.

Slide 29

Talk about Evolution: Next Step in Cognition? Think! SenseAct Environment Agent

Slide 30

No! Cognition will advance by incorporating more and more tools Process SenseAct Environment Cognitive Agent 1 Tool ActSense Cognitive Agent 2

Slide 31

Slide 32

OK, So What?

Slide 33

Exploration and Exploitation As a controller, the brain has to figure out how what it controls is able to interact with the world. That is, before it can exploit its powers, it first needs to explore its powers. Thus, it has to figure out the action potentials of what it controls, as well as those of its environment. As such, the brain will figure out and classify things as: walkable reachable graspable movable hammerable ?

Slide 34

Hammer-Man! Hammers dont hit Nails, People Do! If all you have is a hammer, everything becomes a nail - Bernard Baruch

Slide 35

Copying Blocks Experiment II OriginalCopy Bins Same task as before. However, original is hidden by square, and you have to click on it to reveal the original. Moreover, it takes a certain amount of time for original to appear. Result: the more time it took for original to appear, the more subjects started to rely on internal memory (brain).

Slide 36

The Google Effect The Google effect is that people forget those things that they can Google.Google effect Some people lament this, saying that people have become lazy or stupid, not unlike how the calculator has made people worse at basic arithmetic. But in reality, this was in fact a very smart move of the brain. Incorporating the internet as external memory is not lazy, but efficient. And while brain alone = less smart, brain + internet = smarter! Most importantly, the brain naturally integrates its environment if it makes sense: we dont control this!

Slide 37

How our Brain Integrates Technology: Perception (Click on pic for vid)

Slide 38

How our Brain Integrates Technology: Action (click on pic for vid)

Slide 39

Monday, November 25 4-6pm EMPAC Theater Dr. Jonathan Wolpaw Adaptive Neurotechnologies: Principles & Promise Live Demonstration of Brain-Computer Interface!

Slide 40

Conclusion Technology very much has the potential to change us as cognitive beings, affecting our capacities for perception, action, problem solving, reasoning, etc. i.e. all of cognition. As such, they are anything but neutral, and well have to be cautious in how we proceed with the development of these technologies.

Slide 41

Thank you! With great power comes great responsibility Voltaire, French Philosopher

Slide 42

Back to Drones: Confessions of a Drone Warrior Drone operator Brandon Bryant Was part of drone missions that killed 1626 people Suffers from PTSD November 2013 Issue of GQ

Slide 43

PTSD for Drone Operators? There was no significant difference in the rates of MH diagnoses, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders between RPA and MA pilots. - Pentagon StudyPentagon Study

Slide 44

Why do Drone Operators get PTSD? To some extent, their brain says: Im there Old theory: PTSD is caused by fear Do drone operators fear for their lives the way soldiers do that are actually in the battle zone feel fear? Does the virtual presence become that real? Unlikely. So, new theory: PTSD is caused by moral anguish of killing people

Slide 45

Solution to PTSD?!? [R]esearchers have proposed creating a Siri-like user interface, a virtual copilot that anthropomorphizes the drone and lets crews shunt off the blame for whatever happens. Siri, have those people killed.

Slide 46

Just Because We Will, Should We? Variants: Just because we do, should we?

Slide 47

Technology will Change and Destroy Humanity! If technology becomes more and more integrated with our brains and with our being, basically making us into a race of cyborgs, then that means the end of humankind! So no, even if we will, that doesnt mean we should.

Slide 48

Problems Ought-From-Is or Naturalistic Fallacy: Just because humans are a certain way, doesnt mean that we should be or stay that way.

Slide 49

Technology is Simply Speeding Up Evolution! If technology is really going to change humanity and make us into a race of cyborgs, well, thats just the next step of evolution: Homo Sapiens 2.0! So yes, we will, and we should!

Slide 50

Problems Naturalistic Fallacy again: just because evolution happens doesnt mean it is good. Only shows 1 line of evolution but evolution is a tree! Suggest evolution = progress. In particular: smarter is better but tree of evolution suggests quite a different picture. Also, progress is only increased fitness to local environment this is far cry from fitness in any kind of absolute sense, let alone that this would be better in any kind of moral sense.

Slide 51