Defending Voice over IP Networks Defending Voice over IP Networks
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks Quality of Service for MultiService...
-
Upload
thomas-edwards -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks Quality of Service for MultiService...
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
Quality of ServiceQuality of Service for for
MultiService IP Networks MultiService IP Networks 8th March 20008th March 2000
John A. ClarkJohn A. Clark - Technical Account Manager- Technical Account Manager
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 2
Agenda
• Overview of Enterprise Quality of Service
• The Differentiated Services Model
• DiffServ Traffic Classification
• Mapping DiffServ to/from Link Layers
• RSVP for QoS Signaling
• Summary
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
Enterprise Quality of Enterprise Quality of ServiceService
… … What is it & Why do we need it?What is it & Why do we need it?
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 4
What is driving the need for QoS?
• Increasing number of network users and applications
• New applications and traffic dynamics
— RT, Interactive traffic (VoIP)
— RT, non-Interactive traffic (Video on Demand, RealMedia)
— Non-RT, Interactive traffic (Web surfing)
— Non-RT, Mission Critical traffic (e-Commerce)
— Non-RT, non-Mission Critical traffic (everything else)
• Service Providers offering/pricing tiered levels of service
• Service differentiation in Intranets
— Ability to assign business priorities to traffic or users
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 5
Traffic Classification Proposal
Real-time, Delay Intolerant
Absolute priority with no packet discard.
Delay typically < 50ms
Traffic Category Required Treatment
Inter-human communications (interactive), e.g., VoIP, Video conferencing
Real-time,Delay Tolerant
Guaranteed delivery with little to no packet discard Delay typically < 500ms
Single-human communication (non-interactive), e.g., Steaming audio or video
Application Examples
Non-Real-time, Mission Critical
Guaranteed delivery with minimal packet discard
Delay typically < 5000ms
Transaction processing, e.g., financial transactions, e-commerce
Non-Real-time, Non-Mission Critical
Best effort deliveryEmail, Web, FTP, SNMP, etc.
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 6
PEN (Policy Enabled Networking) Strategy
3 Key Focus Areas
• QoS and Service Classification– Define Enterprise End-to-End QoS architecture– Standardize Service Classes used across Nortel products
• Packet Flow Classification– Define Queuing Mechanisms– Define Congestion Avoidance Mechanisms
• Policy Enablement– Define Centralized Policy Management requirements
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 7
CoSQoS
CoS CoS CoS
WAN
QoS/CoS: What’s the difference?
For sake of discussion, let us define the following:
• CoS (Nodal):
— Behavioral treatment of traffic flows through a network node
— Traffic Prioritization and Discarding
• QoS (Network):
— Guaranteed level of traffic service performance across network
— CoS plus BW reservation/admission control mechanisms
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 8
Simple Message:QoS achieved using CoS Mechanisms
QoS Vision
• QoS over LANs — Achieved using simple CoS mechanisms
• QoS over WANs— Today: Requires BW reservation/admission control mechanisms
— Future: Will only need simple CoS mechanisms
• Vision will be achieved by implementing:— Best CoS and congestion avoidance mechanisms
— Consistent treatment of CoS across all products
— Robust Policy Management solution
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
Differentiated Services Differentiated Services ModelModel
… … The industry directionThe industry direction
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 10
Differential Services (DiffServ) Model
• End-to-End Architecture defined by RFC 2475
— Defines CoS on a Per Hop basis
— Relies on congestion avoidance mechanisms
— Requires all network nodes to comply to be effective
• “Open Loop” system
— No feedback from network to determine if there is congestion
• DiffServ Domain
— Set of DiffServ nodes with common service provisioning policy
— Policy Manager provides the policy
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 11
DiffServ Domain
• DiffServ Domain across Campus LAN
Ingress or Egress Nodes(Network Edge)
L2 Switch L3 SwitchInterior LAN Nodes
(Network Core)
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 12
Packet Treatment by DS Edge NodesPolicing
Scheduling
MarkingDSCP
Shaping
• Filtering based on:
— S/D IP Address, TCP/UDP Port, Protocol ID, DS Field (ToS)
• Policing— Does the flow conform to policy?
• Marking
— Mark/Re-mark DS Code Point based on policy
• Congestion Management
— Drop Precedence
— Avoidance: RED or WRED
• Shaping
— Improves efficiency and conformance to policy
• Scheduling
— Ensures queues get serviced according to priorities
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 13
Shaping
Scheduling
Packet Treatment by DS Core Nodes
Policing
MarkingDSCP
Shaping
• Congestion Management — Drop Precedence— Avoidance: RED or WRED
• Shaping— Improves efficiency and conformance to policy
• Scheduling— Ensures queues get serviced according to priorities
Scheduling
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 14
Per-Hop Behaviors (PHBs)
• PHBs are the packet-forwarding treatment that delivers the “differentiated service” to packets at network nodes
— Policing
— Possible remarking of DS Code Point (DSCP)
— Enqueuing treatment (e.g., drop preference)
— Shaping
— Scheduling
• IETF has defined the following DiffServ PHBs:
— Expedited Forwarding (EF) - RFC 2598
— Assured Forwarding (AF) - RFC 2597
— DEfault Forwarding (DE) - RFC 2474
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 15
DS Field
• DS Field defined by RFC 2474
• Supercedes existing definitions
— IPv4 ToS Field (RFC 791)
— IPv6 Traffic Class Octet (RFC 2460)
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
DiffServ Traffic ClassificationDiffServ Traffic Classification
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 17
Expedited Forwarding (EF) PHB - RFC 2598
• “Virtual leased line” Substitute “Service”— Police and drop on network ingress— Modest buffering needed (no burst)— Typically uses strict priority queuing— Shape on egress to maintain contract with next DS Domain
• Network Engineering Requirements
— Egress rate must exceed ingress rate
• Traffic Engineering Guidelines
— For multiservice networks, EF Traffic is typically kept to a small fraction of total network traffic, e.g., 10%
— However, this is completely application-dependent
EFDSCP = 101110
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 18
Assured Forwarding (AF) PHB - RFC 2597
DropPrecedence
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4
Low 001010(AF11)
010010(AF21)
011010(AF31)
100010(AF41)
Medium 001100(AF12)
010100(AF22)
011100(AF32)
100100(AF42)
High 001110(AF13)
010110(AF23)
011110(AF33)
100110(AF43)
LowestLatency
HighestLatency
HighestDiscard
LowestDiscard
• 4 AF Classes (priority classes)
• 3 Drop Precedences per AF class
• 6-bit value located in the DS Field
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 19
Proposed Service Classification for Nortel
User TrafficCategory
Service ClassName
Real-time,Delay Intolerant
Premium
PlatinumReal-time,Delay Tolerant Gold
SilverNon-Real-time,Mission Critical Bronze
Non-Real-time,Non-Mission Critical
Standard
EF PHB
DE PHB
AF PHBs
Service Class names make configuration more intuitive
DiffServ PHBs
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 20
Congestion Avoidance Mechanisms
• Required for DiffServ architecture to work properly
• Drop Precedence
— AF PHB offers 3 levels of drop precedence for each AF class
— All DE PHB traffic is eligible to discard
— No EF PHB traffic is eligible to discard
• RED
— Required to break global synchronization of TCP/IP sessions
— Actively and randomly drops packets
— WRED/MRED variants allow weighting of different queues
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 21
Traffic Scheduling
• Strict Priority Schedulers
— Assigns a fixed % of total BW to a queue
— Queue must be emptied prior to others being serviced
• Weighted Bandwidth Schedulers
— Lower priority queues borrow higher priority queue BW when available– Higher priority queues reclaim borrowed BW as needed
— Two Commonly used algorithms– Weighted Round Robin (WRR)– Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ)
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 22
Nodal Handling
Traffic Category ServiceClass
SchedulingMechanism
DiscardEligibility
DiffServ PHB
Real-time,Delay Intolerant
Premium Strict Priority None withinprofile
EF
Platinum WFQ, WRR Lowestwith RED
AF1Real-time,Delay Tolerant
Gold WFQ, WRR Lowwith RED
AF2
Silver WFQ, WRR Mediumwith RED
AF3Non-Real-time,Mission Critical
Bronze WFQ, WRR Medium-Highwith RED
AF4
Non-Real-time,Non-Mission Critical
Standard WFQ, WRR Highwith RED
DE
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
Mapping IP to/from Link Mapping IP to/from Link LayersLayers
… … preserving DiffServ behavior at Layer 2preserving DiffServ behavior at Layer 2
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 24
IP/Layer 2 Traffic Classification
• IP Filtering on:— Source/Destination IP Address— Source/Destination TCP/UDP Port number— DSCP— Protocol ID
• Ethernet 802.1p User Priorities— 8 User Priorities— Highest level queue serviced before next lower level queue
• ATM— CBR, rt-VBR, nrt-VBR, ABR, UBR— Single or Multiple Virtual Circuits
• Frame Relay— CIR, EIR, DE— Single or Multiple Virtual Circuits
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 25
Ethernet 802.1p User Priorities
• 8 User Priorities (traffic classes)
• DiffServ PHB mapped to/from 802.1p User Priorities
6 bytes 6 bytes
DestMAC
SourceMAC
802.1qTAG
4 bytes
ProtocolType
2 bytes
Data
64-1500 bytes
TagProtocolIdentifier
TagControlInfo
81 - 00Priority
bitsCFI
VLANID
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 26
DSCP to 802.1p Mapping Example
ServiceClass
DiffServ Code Point(DSCP)
802.1p UserPriority
Premium EF 7
Platinum AF11, AF12 or AF13 6
Gold AF21, AF22 or AF23 5 (or 4)
Silver AF31, AF32 or AF33 3 (or 2)
Bronze AF41, AF42 or AF43 0 (Default)
Standard DE 1
• Standard, power-up default mapping
• Egress to non-Layer 3 “aware” L2 Switch— Required because L2 switch cannot interpret DSCP
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 27
DSCP to ATM CoS Mapping Example
Service ClassName
DiffServ CodePoint (DSCP)
ATM CoS
Premium EF CBR
Platinum AF11, AF12 or AF13
Gold AF21, AF22 or AF23 rt-VBR
Silver AF31, AF32 or AF33
Bronze AF41, AF42 or AF43 nrt-VBR
Standard DE ABR or UBR
• Sample, power-up default mapping
• ATM to DSCP mapping not required
— IP DSCP is preserved across ATM network
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 28
DSCP to Frame Relay VC Mapping Example
ServiceClass
DiffServ Code Point(DSCP)
Frame RelaySVC or PVC
Premium EF VC#1
Platinum AF11, AF12 or AF13 VC#2
Gold AF21, AF22 or AF23 VC#3
Silver AF31, AF32 or AF33 VC#4
Bronze AF41, AF42 or AF43 VC#5
Standard DE VC#6
• Frame Relay does not have any native CoS mechanisms
• Each VC is assigned the following for each flow— Guaranteed BW (CIR) — Burst BW (EIR) — Discard Eligibility (DE)
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
RSVP for QoS SignalingRSVP for QoS Signaling
… … a new use for RSVPa new use for RSVP
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 30
New use for RSVP
• RSVP for DiffServ
— Used as a QoS signaling mechanism
— Application or appliance uses RSVP to request:– Bandwidth– Prioritization– Authentication– Authorization
— Request made to edge device in DiffServ domain
— Edge device or Policy Server admit or reject request
— Driven by Microsoft’s inclusion of RSVP enabling technology in Windows 2000
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 31
L2 Switch• Sets DSCP and 802.1p User Priority based on OPS policy setting
L3 Switch• Sets DSCP or 802.1p
User Priority based on OPS policy setting
Etherset • Sets DSCP or
802.1p User Priority
PBX VoIP• Sets DSCP• Upstream devices configured to respect DSCP• Supports H.323
Router (VoIP Media Gateway)• Sets DSCP based on OPS policy setting• “State” is maintained between OPS and
router
IP Classification w/o RSVP QoS Signaling
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 32
IP Classification with RSVP QoS signaling
Client PC• QoS signaled via RSVP• Win2000 app. sets DSCP• NIC sets 802.1p user priority
L2 Switch• Detects RSVP packet and forwards to OPS• OPS sends DSCP via COPS• Maps DSCP to 802.1 user priority
L3 Switch• Detects RSVP packet
and forwards to OPS• OPS determines
DSCP and sends via COPS
Etherset• Sets DSCP or
802.1p User Priority
PBX VoIP• Sets DSCP• Upstream devices configured to respect DSCP• Supports H.323
Router VoIP Media Gateway• Detects RSVP packet• Requests policy from OPS based on
RSVP message• Sets DSCP based on Optivity Policy
Server (OPS) policy setting• “State” is maintained between OPS
and router
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks - Page 33
Summary
• DiffServ is the predominant IP QoS Architecture
• IP QoS is in the early stages of standardization
• Good traffic management required to make all this work
• Policy Enablement simplifies and automates network administration
Technical Presentation Series: QoS for MultiService IP Networks
Thank youThank you
Questions ?Questions ?
John A. Clark - Technical Account ManagerJohn A. Clark - Technical Account Manager