From TIMP to TIMP KPI

December 12, 2011

Ingbjørn Refsdal

Technical Integrity Management

Programme (TIMP)

This material is not to be reproduced without the permission of Statoil ASA

• Technical Integrity Management programme

• The challenge

• Building and developing the program

• Implementing TIMP

• The TIMP model

• Key learnings

• Verifications – TTS and OTS

• Technical Integrity indicator – TIMP KPI

From TIMP to TIMP KPI

The challenge

Managing technical integrity ensures predictable and sustainable operations

• Industry challenges:

− operate in various environments with different regulatory regimes and

operating conditions

− lack of a uniform approach to asset integrity management

− sharing of information

“It is particularly crucial to distinguish between process safety

and occupational safety”.

Source: 2005 "Baker Panel report"

Building and developing the program

• Define project

− mandate

− scope

− resources

− steering committee

− project risks Anleggsansvarlig

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Referansegruppe

, TNE PRT HSET

, PRT GPT TIKA

, TNE PRT RT TIKAL

, EPN ONS GRA INST

, EPN ODV TMB

, ONO ASG OPS

, EPN ODV TMST

Styringskomité

, EPN ODV

, CSO CHSE

, EPN OWE

, TNE PRT

, M&M MAN HSEQ

, NG PT

, TNE POMM

Programleder

, EPN ODV

TIMP IT Tool

TNE PRT POMM

Anleggsansvarlig

(AI leder)

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

(AI leder)

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

(AI leder)

Implementeringsteam

, Leder

, DNV

, arbeidsprosess

, kompetanse og opplæring

, risikovurdering

, TNE PRT POMM

, ONS TRO OPS

Implementerings-

ansvarlig UPN Bergen

, EPN ODV TMB

Implementerings-

ansvarlig UPN Nord

,

EPN ODV TMST

Implementerings-

ansvarlig UPN Stav.

, EPN ODV TMN

Implementerings-

ansvarlig M&M

MAN OMS PL

Implementerings-

ansvarlig NG

, NG PT OMS

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Leder Teknisk

Integritet

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Leder Teknisk

Integritet

Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Referansegruppe

, TNE PRT HSET

, PRT GPT TIKA

, TNE PRT RT TIKAL

, EPN ONS GRA INST

, EPN ODV TMB

, ONO ASG OPS

, EPN ODV TMST

Styringskomité

, EPN ODV

, CSO CHSE

, EPN OWE

, TNE PRT

, M&M MAN HSEQ

, NG PT

, TNE POMM

Programleder

, EPN ODV

TIMP IT Tool

TNE PRT POMM

Anleggsansvarlig

(AI leder)

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

(AI leder)

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

(AI leder)

Implementeringsteam

, Leder

, DNV

, arbeidsprosess

, kompetanse og opplæring

, risikovurdering

, TNE PRT POMM

, ONS TRO OPS

Implementerings-

ansvarlig UPN Bergen

, EPN ODV TMB

Implementerings-

ansvarlig UPN Nord

,

EPN ODV TMST

Implementerings-

ansvarlig UPN Stav.

, EPN ODV TMN

Implementerings-

ansvarlig M&M

MAN OMS PL

Implementerings-

ansvarlig NG

, NG PT OMS

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Leder Teknisk

Integritet

AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig

Anleggsansvarlig

Leder Teknisk

Integritet

Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator

Learning from others

• Airport express train (Flytoget)

• Avinor (airport operator)

• ConocoPhillips Norway

• Det Norske Veritas

• ExxonMobil

• Incident investigation reports

• Kuwait Petroleum Corporation

• McKinsey North Sea Roundtable

• Petrobras

• Shell Exploration & Production

• TATA Steel

F

E

D

C

B

F

E

D

C

B

Work process Competence

Technical Integrity Management Portal Assessment methodology

TIMP

Implementing the program

• Comprehensive preparations

• Ambitious plan

• Correlated with operating activities

• Support

• Dedicated core team

• Local champions / owners

34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

KVG

Gullfaks

Kristin

Kårstø incl Draupner

Troll

Tjeldbergodden

Sleipner

Oseberg

Kollsnes

Heidrun

Norne

Snorre

Åsgard

Marginalfelt

Njord

Mongstad incl Sture

Hammerfest LNG

Statfjord

Kalundborg

NG rørledningsdrift

Course Kick off and evaluation Evaluation subsequent installations

Installation

August September October November December January February March

Knowledge

exchange

Discipline

competence

Operational

competence

SAMS STID

QRA

SYNERGI

DISP

SAP

Data

sources

Informations

ources

Key

SAP

Maintenance

administration

system

DISP Dispensation

system

SYNERGI HSE incident

reporting

QRA Quantitative Risk

Assessment

STID Technical

information

SAMS

Audit management

and reporting

system

A portal visualises

the status of

technical barriers

Overall technical

integrity of the

plant is assessed

and documented

Technical condition is assessed

on equipment, system and

barrier

level

Information through

indicators form the

basis for technical

assessment

Expert judgement

Availability of

safety equipment

Backlog

safety critical

maintenance

Etc. Temporary

dispensations

Backlog consequence

classification

System n Barrier 1 Barrier n System 1

TIMP model

Technical Integrity Management Portal

12

F

E

D

C

B

F

E

D

C

B

Value creation

Work process Competence

Technical Integrity Management Portal Assessment methodology

• Standardised approach for following

up technical integrity

• Clarified roles and responsibilities

• Information through indicators form

the basis for technical assessment

• Discipline evaluations transformed to

basis for management decisions

• Improved competence on risk and

barriers

• More than 1600 key personnel trained

• Reduced workload through

simplification (automated data

collection)

• Holistic overview of technical integrity

as basis for prioritisation of risk

reducing measures

TIMP

Key learnings

Preparation

• Clear objective

• Focus on value creation

• Early senior management buy-in and ownership

• Learning from others

Development

• Dedicated core team

• Regular updating of strategy towards target

• Simultaneous development of all TIMP elements

Implementation

• Strong focus on building competence

• Designated support function during roll-out and implementation

• Ensure implementation

15 - Classification: Internal 2011-

07-20

15 -

TIMP TTS OTS

Technical Integrity

Management Program

Technical Safety

Condition

Operational Safety

Condition

• Equipment

• System

• Performance Standard

• Plant dashboard

• Functionality

• Integrity

• Survivability

• Maintenance

• Competence

• Procedures

• Roles & responsibilities

• Management, etc.

Verification and continuous monitoring

Verification Continuous monitoring

16 - Classification: Internal 2011-

07-20

16 -

Overview of the TTS/OTS structure

TTS

Each barrier is divided into Performance Requirements

Each Performance Requirement consist of checklists

TTS verify 23 defined Technical Performance Standards OTS verify 7 defined Operational Performance Standards

On the basis of the checklist each Performance Requirement is given a scoring on a scale from A - F

The checklists are evaluated through activities such as: • Document review • Analyse data • Interview / Questionnaire • Inspection / testing • Observation

Gaps marked as findings!

OTS

Finding 1 Finding 2 Finding n

Technical integrity KPI

17

Basis: Technical integrity

for safety barriers – manually

quality assured evaluations

Evaluation scores converted to

numbers

Weighting of barriers importance based on expert

judgement

Calculation of plant specific TI indicator

TI indicator

with status and

trend

Technical integrity KPI – Alt 2

18

Barrier score

• Manual evaluation

• Score converted to predefined numbers

Weighting and calculation

• Pre defined barrier weighting

• KPI calculation

TI indicator

• Plant specific

• Trend and status

Application

19

Plant benchmark Performance management

Cons

• May camouflage important issues

through aggregation

• May turn focus to the indicator itself

rather than underlying issues and

improvement actions

• May give better grade than without

KPI to appear good (or worse grade

to get more resources)

TI indicator - Pros and cons

20

Pros

• Provides incentives for continuous

improvement

• Highlights the «best in class» ->

experience transfer and learning

• Provides decision support for

prioritization