Team Everest Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

32
Team Everest Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011 From: http://www.flickr.com/photos/troyismad/89419822/

description

Team Everest Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011. From: http://www.flickr.com/photos/troyismad/89419822/. Team Members. Larry Battle (CSE). Chris Brown (SE). Erica Llaca (SE). Bikash Acharya (CS). * Product Summary * Requirements * Layers / Sub-layers * Motivation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Team Everest Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Page 1: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Team Everest Architectural Design Review

September 15, 2011

From: http://www.flickr.com/photos/troyismad/89419822/

Page 2: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Team Members

Larry Battle (CSE) Chris Brown (SE)

Bikash Acharya (CS) Erica Llaca (SE)

Page 3: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Overview

7/7/11

1. * Product Summary2. * Requirements

* Layers / Sub-layers1. * Motivation2. * Flexibility3. * Feasibility4. * Testing

Page 4: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Product Summary

Page 5: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Customer Requirements1) The product will run in real time and have the results without lag.

2) The software shall process little response time

Page 6: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Customer Requirements

3) The product shall have minimally invasive hardware

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/neurosky-mindwave-01-top.jpg

Page 7: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Customer Requirements

4) The product shall track all ranges of concentration

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2009/6/30/1246373469711/Customers-use-computers-a-001.jpg

Page 8: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Customer Requirements5) The product shall have little to no notification of concentration awareness

http://www.remove-virtumonde.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/virtumonde-pop-ups1.jpg

Page 9: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Customer Requirements6) Must run on an average computer system.

http://media.photobucket.com/image/cpu%20magazine%20mods/jordan23james/100_4271.jpg

Page 10: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

7/7/11

Question: What are specs for an average computer system in 2011?

Image from: http://exonome.com/fj/phkl/open.jpg

Page 11: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Answer:

CPU: 2.0GHz dual-core or betterRAM: 2-4GBHard drive: 160GB+Video: 512MB - 1GBOS: Windows XP or better

7/7/11

Question: What are specs for an average computer system in 2011?

Image from: http://exonome.com/fj/phkl/open.jpg

Page 12: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

ADS History

Page 13: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

ADS History

Page 14: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

ADS History

Page 15: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Overview of Layers

Page 16: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Server Image from: http://www.instablogsimages.com/images/2007/01/08/hp-mediasmart-server_48.jpg

Page 17: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Sub Layers

Page 18: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

http://hacknmod.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/messy-cables.jpg

Page 19: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Event Handler Sub-layer

Page 20: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Input Sub-layer

Page 21: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Database Sub-layer

Page 22: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Manager Sub-layer

Page 23: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Analyzer Sub-layer

Page 24: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Check Sub-layer

Page 25: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Browser Sub-layer

Page 26: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

7/7/11http://one7.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/browsers.jpg

Question: Which browser do you prefer?

Page 27: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Testing for I/O Layer

1) Can the input sub-layer process the input from the external devices within a reasonable amount of time?

2) Can the database sub-layer add, update, deletedata from the database?

3) Does the input and database sub-layers sent data to the appropriate location?

4) Does the input simplify the data correctly?

Page 28: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Testing Logic Layer

1) Can the Check Sub-Layer find and report errors?

2) Does the Event Handler send data to the function of the assigned Destination?

3) Do all the sub-layers communicate with the Event Handler correctly?

4) Does the Analyzer sub-layer launch an attention getter event when the user isn’t concentrated for a certain time period?

Page 29: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Testing Controls

1) Can the Browser Sub-Layer communicate with the browser?

2) Are the attention getters appearing on the screen forthe designated time?

3) Can the Browser Sub-Layer turn off our program when the browser is closed?

Page 30: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Motivation/ Flexibility

Page 31: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Feasibility

http://tamsconcretecanvas.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama_yes_we_can.jpg

Page 32: Team Everest  Architectural Design Review September 15, 2011

Any Questions?

http://committeeofpublicsafety.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/cute-sad-kitten06.jpg