Team 4

34
Team 4 Alan, Danielle, & Stephen

description

Team 4. Alan, Danielle, & Stephen. Observation. Revealing a flushing mechanism Located in the Head in the Armory Instructions located on the top. Observation. Problem: Top is approximately 62” from the floor. Observation. Mean eye level for American Male is 64.7 inches - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Team 4

Page 1: Team 4

Team 4

Alan, Danielle, & Stephen

Page 2: Team 4

Observation

• Revealing a flushing mechanism

• Located in the Head in the Armory

• Instructions located on the top

Page 3: Team 4

Observation

• Problem: Top is approximately 62” from the floor

Page 4: Team 4

Observation

• Mean eye level for American Male is 64.7 inches

• Must be well above this to look down on the top. Most are at an oblique angle or below.

Page 5: Team 4

Observation

• Attempt to alleviate the issue on ground floor

Page 6: Team 4

VISUAL ATTENTION IN DRIVINGA study comparing novice and expert drivers

Page 7: Team 4

“Visual attention and the transition from novice

to advanced driver”

G. Underwood (2007). Ergonomics

Page 8: Team 4

Background

• 20% - 30% of accidents are due to inattentive driving– Smoking– Eating– Applying makeup– Looking for objects in vehicle– Looking at objects on roadside– PDA’s

Page 9: Team 4

The risk of an accident

increases dramatically if

an unexpected road event occurs

while the driver is distracted

Page 10: Team 4

Situation Awareness

• Driving environment is visually busy

• Need to control the vehicle and awareness of external events

• Experienced drivers have better situational awareness

Page 11: Team 4

Safe vehicle operation requires:

• Lane keeping• Maintenance of speed• Maintenance of heading• Monitoring for hazards• Accurate navigation

Page 12: Team 4

Differences between novice and experienced drivers

• Visual attention– Younger drivers pay less attention

• Mental model– Experienced drivers accumulate memories

• Scanning behaviors

– Experienced drivers scan more

Page 13: Team 4

Reviews

• Eye scanning elliptical area

• Scanning behavior increases with

experience

• Changes in traffic/road conditions:

– Novices not sensitive to

– Experienced drivers anticipate

Page 14: Team 4

Reviews cont.

• Eye scanning road conditions:– Experienced drivers do– Novices don’t

• Very experienced drivers (police) short fixed duration– mental model supports dismissal of irrelevant

information– greater sampling of visual environment

Page 15: Team 4

Why Novices Fail to Scan

• Perception

• Comprehension

• Prediction• Novices

– one level – only perceive• Experienced

– Comprehend and predict hazards

Page 16: Team 4

Press key when detecting hazard

Hazard Prediction Experiment

• Videos of novice and expert driving– Rural– Urban– Dual carriageway

Page 17: Team 4

Results

• Experienced and novice process videos differently

• Experienced greater horizontal scanning• Experienced scan paths sensitive to

environment-novices didn’t

• Novices interest in road ahead

Page 18: Team 4

Attending to Hazardous Events

• Maintain awareness of other vehicles

• Hazards cause “attention capture” of novices only

• Very experienced drivers seek out and monitor multiple hazards

Page 19: Team 4

Learning to Anticipate Hazards

• Novice drivers trained to scan and anticipate hazards

• Results– Trained subjects scanned more of scene– Scanning behavior changes persisted until re-

test months later

Page 20: Team 4

Conclusion• Inattention and distraction contribute to accidents

– Unlikely to detect unexpected event

• Novices restricted scanning behavior– Not a matter of higher workload– Novice mental model – no accurate estimate of hazards

• Expert Drivers Mental Model more active and efficient scanning– Quickly dismiss irrelevant– Anticipate hazards, scan accordingly

• Training alters novice scan patterns– Encourages more active visual attention– Fosters predictive ability to anticipate other drivers

Page 21: Team 4

CHAPTER 10Visual Environment: Measurement and Design

Page 22: Team 4

Vision and the Eye

• Description of the way the eye works

Page 23: Team 4

Retinal Adaptation

• Ability to change sensitivity based on ambient light

• Night driving with sudden oncoming headlights is example

• Additional lights at tunnel entry and exit

Page 24: Team 4

Photometric Terminology

• Luminous intensity

Candela (cd)– Power of a source to emit light in a particular

direction

Page 25: Team 4

Photometric Terminology

• Luminous flux

Lumen (lm)– Rate of flow of luminous energy

Page 26: Team 4

Photometric Terminology

• Luminance

cd/m2

– Light emitted by a surface

Page 27: Team 4

Photometric Terminology

• Illuminance

Lux (lx)– Amount of light falling on a surface

Page 28: Team 4

Photometric Terminology

• Reflectance

– Ratio of the luminance and illuminance at a surface

Page 29: Team 4

Task lighting

• Visual tasks require light to illuminate the task environment

Page 30: Team 4

Visual tasks require light

• Proper lighting is more important for older subjects than younger

• Documented productivity increases with higher illumination levels– cigarette rolling– leather working

Page 31: Team 4

Glare

• Increases task demands– more pronounced in older subjects

• Bright lights can cause “retinal afterimages”• Obscure the task environment in night

driving– Oncoming headlights– Street lights– Construction beacons

Page 32: Team 4

Lighting Design• Suitable level of illumination• Balance of surface luminance

– Driving• ambient lighting• external lighting• dashboard brightness

• Light uniformity over time– Dynamic domain like driving this can change frequently – Changes can impact night vision of drivers

• Avoid glare

Page 33: Team 4

Line of Sight

• Driver’s 360° line of sight is critical factor in vehicle design

• In industrial applications, adequate field of view could eliminate need for a ‘spotter”

• Improved field of view could support more efficient operations

Page 34: Team 4