Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

31
Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems
  • date post

    22-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    217
  • download

    1

Transcript of Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Page 1: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Team 2: Final Report

Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems

Page 2: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Statement of the Tomography Problem

• Observe the arrival time, given the first order physics

• Invert for the slowness, or density

(x,z)

Page 3: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Creating Synthetic Data

• Our ‘unknown’ earth model is a layered model

• Vertical/Horizontal observations are important!

• The observations are calculated as line integrals through the synthetic model.

Page 4: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Choose A Model

• There are many choices for model!

• Each choice leads to a different solution

• Each solution can be evaluated for goodness of fit.

• Haar wavelets provide an easy way to describe a region.

Page 5: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Our Model Has Errors!• The travel times do not allow us to

reconstruct all the details of the layers.• We use covariance matrices are used to

measure the uncertainty of the model.– Prior covariance matrix is used to account for

the model uncertainty without considering the observed traveltimes.

– Posterior covariance is accounts for the observed traveltimes.

Page 6: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Solving the Inverse Problem for a single choice of model

Page 7: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

The Prior Distribution

“The natural choice for a prior pdf is the distribution that allows for the greatest uncertainty while obeying the constraints imposed by the prior information, and it can be shown that this least informative pdf is the pdf that has maximum entropy” (Jaynes 1968, 1995, Papoulis 1984)

From Malinverno, 2000

Page 8: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior PDF: Mean Surface

Page 9: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior PDF: Uncertainty Window

Page 10: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Colormap

Uncertainty

Mean

Page 11: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior PDF: Composite

Page 12: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

The Data Prediction Matrix• For each observation, we calculate the same line integral through our wavelet model. These are the columns.

• The better the model is, the closer these integrals match up with our observations

Page 13: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Data Prediction Matrix

Page 14: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior PDF: 3D Histogram Surfaces

The posterior mean is the best estimate for the unknown function.

The posterior uncertainty allows us to put error bars on this estimate.

Page 15: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior PDF: Mean Surface

Page 16: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior PDF: Uncertainty Window

Page 17: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior PDF: Composite

Page 18: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Other Results

Page 19: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Solving the Inverse Problem for many choices of model

Page 20: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Finding a Best Model

Strategy: Check many models and find which ones fit the data the best!

• Each model has a neighborhood of hereditary models

Optimization algorithm: • check neighborhood for better

model (a single neighbor is selected at random)

• Run for a fixed amount of time

Page 21: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Synthetic Data

Page 22: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior Mean

Page 23: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior Uncertainty

Page 24: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior Mean/Uncertainty Comp.

Page 25: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Prior Uncertainty Surfaces

Page 26: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Log Marginal Likelihood

Page 27: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Optimal Decimation

Page 28: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Observed vs. Predicted

Page 29: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior Mean

Page 30: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior Uncertainty

Page 31: Team 2: Final Report Uncertainty Quantification in Geophysical Inverse Problems.

Posterior Mean/Uncertainty