Teague Leadership Assignment 2 Seminar
Transcript of Teague Leadership Assignment 2 Seminar
Assignment 2: Leadership Portfolio
by Courtney L. Teague
EDD 9100-OL2_34211Educational Leadership Seminar
Nova Southeastern UniversityMarch 16, 2013
Leadership
Leadership is such an abstract term when asked to describe its meaning in colorless
words. Leadership is best described as one’s actions. Many people continue to argue about
whether leaders are born or made. Real leaders do not acknowledge those meaningless
arguments, however focus more on leadership quality development and knowing who they are
intimately (Banutu-Gomez, 2013; Stanley, 2013). “Leadership is learning by doing, adapting, to
actual situations. Leaders are constantly learning from their errors and failures” Claude Meyer
(as cited in Kouzes & Posner, 2002). Leaders do not exist in a vacuum and often leaders do not
wear the title of “leader.” Leadership is a melting pot of clarity, coaching, courage, competence,
and character (Stanley, 2003). Leadership is an influencing characteristic. It is about having an
impact on an individual in such as they will follow and/or support your decision. There is an old
saying that I often hear, “If you want something done right, do it yourself.” The saying can be no
more wrong than two right shoes. Leadership is getting goals achieved through the input of
others.
My leadership style
Leadership style is defined by leader’s behaviors focusing on leader’s actions (Northouse,
2012). In life, changes whether bad or good will happen and I must make the best of it. I am a
democratic/transformational leader. I identify myself as a democratic/transformational leader
because I treat others the way I would want to be treated with change in mind. Democratic
leaders do not use the “tops down approach” or reflect an superiority complex. Democratic
leaders provide information, guidance, and suggestions (Northhouse, 2012). “He that thinketh he
leadeth…and hath no one following him…only taketh a walk” Dr. John Maxwell (as cited in
Finzel, 2000). As a transformational leader, I depend on high levels of communication between
2
myself and others to meet the goals of the organization. The “Path-Goal Styles Questionnaire”
results examined of my use of style relates to other styles of leadership. My directive and
participative leadership scores indicated that I am in moderate range. My scores in achievement-
oriented leadership and supportive leadership indicated that I am high range. Achievement-
oriented and supportive leadership indicates that I understand the importance of social support as
well as inviting others to provide input is important to changing the climate (Northouse, 2012).
As a leader I have to understand that the most important thing occurring our world is not
reported in the evening news or on the front of USA Today. It is not enough to just know new
lifestyles, new buildings, and new technologies are changing but knowing the demands of life are
changing extremely fast (Corneh, 2004).
As a special educator, I have learned the importance of individualization. Each person
has different needs and requirements as well as possesses different strengths and talents. If one
wants others to understand that I value their contributions and their importance, one will have to
individualize and build sustainable relationships. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs clearly states that
belonging and love are two of the most essential factors that are essential for motivation (Hunter,
2013). One cannot have the one-size fits all approach when communicating to others (Rath &
Clifton, 2009, p.65). I am an inquisitive leader and I consider myself a life long learner wanting
to know more about life in general. The characteristic of being inquisitive is an essential
leadership trait. An effective leader must be inquisitive because our global society is ever
changing (Banutu-Gomez, 2013). Being inquisitive will make the transition to changing
environments and understanding people easier. My leadership style also consists of being dual.
Although there may be times I am unsure, I must not let it show. Duality is the ability to
equalize tension and manage uncertainty. There are times that I was unsure about my role as a
3
leader; however, I did not hesitate to pretend to have it all in control (McBride, 2011;Stend,
2008).
Leadership legacy
When thinking about leaving a legacy there are three questions that one should ask
(Stanley, 2003):
What do I know now that I wish I had known then?
Of all that could be said about leadership, what do I want the next generation
of leaders to know or do?
What leadership principles I wish a previous leader had shared with me when
I was a young leader?
Leadership is the influence you have on others (Banutu-Gomez, 2013). Leadership is
more than having a high-powered position within an organization. It is about when you leave,
will others be able to continue to make changes and impact others. A leader should not be treated
as bubble gum, chew it now and throw it away (Steng, 2008). Success without a successor is an
extreme indicator of failed leadership (Finzel, 2000). As a leader, I want to be remembered for
knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing is when information, skills, or expertise is shared among
people for a greater good (Banutu-Gomez, 2013). I cannot rest until I am able to help others
identify their gifts and talents. Knowledge sharing creates a stronger sense of belonging and it
will lead to an increased innovative and collaborative community (Liebowitz, 2008). People will
realize that organizational goals can be achieved when they recognize they can cooperate and
share information, listen to each other’s ideas, and responds through positive interdependence
(Kouzes & Posner, 2002, p.282).
4
Leadership strengths and weaknesses
My grandmother always used to say that the true strength of a leader is his or her ability
to turn the other cheek when struck and show others the right way by extending their hand in the
midst of turmoil. Leaders strengths include relationships that are established by showing trust
and commitment (Liebowitz, 2008). In a previous class I was required to come face to face with
my strengths and weaknesses as leader. I often found myself trying to avoid my strengths
because I did not want the accountability or responsibility associated with leadership. I
completed the Strength Finders Survey by The Gallup Organization. The survey reviewed my
skills and knowledge I have acquired and how I was able to develop strategies to meet the
demands of my career, life, and families. The results indicated my signature themes respectively:
maximizer, relator, woo, command, and ideation. The first signature theme is a “maximize.” I
does not want to spend time focusing on weaknesses however, finding ways to capitalize on the
strengths. I refine and strive towards excellence. The second signature theme is a “realtor.” As a
realtor, I tend to associate with familiar people. I do not turn away from meeting new people, I
get a thrill from turning strangers into new friends. However, I get strength and pleasure from
being around friends that I have experienced life with. I am a risk taker and I realize that certain
risks are associated with encouraging a deepening of relationships with people. The more risks
that I take with a person proves that our relationship is authentic. The third signature theme is a
“woo.” Woo stands for winning people over. I am not easily intimidated by strangers. I find
myself wanting to learn more about the strangers. I can establish rapport with anyone no matter
the situation. The fourth signature theme is “command.” Command means I like to take charge
but not forcefully and I don’t rest until I share great ideas with others. I push others to take risks
even if it makes them feel uncomfortable. It is to uncover and develop their strengths. The final
5
signature theme is “ideation.” I am amused by ideas. I constantly look to discover underlying
messages and often try to make connections. A new idea is a new challenge for me and I am
ready to take on a new challenge.
The “Setting Tone Questionnaire” purpose was to develop an understanding of the impact
of my leadership as well as identify my strengths in establishing the group/organization’s tone.
The survey results yielded similar results to the Strengths Finder survey. The results of the
questionnaire indicated that I have high preference to provide structure, clarify norms, and build
cohesiveness, and promote excellence as a standard (The Gallup Organization, n.d.). As a
leader, I must be able to convey vision and have a plan if I expect others to follow. Many people
have a personal need for structure. Personal need for structure refers to individual differences in
the need to structure one’s environment (Leicht, Randsley de Moura, & Crisp, 2013). I can
relate to the personal need for structure as indicated by “Task and Relationship Questionnaire”
results. The questionnaire identified how much I place an emphasis on relationship and task
behaviors in my life and how my relationship behavior is related to my task behavior. My results
indicated that my task score and relationship score are balanced and includes an equal amount of
giving to goal accomplishment and dealing with people.
When I think of my weaknesses the first things that come to my mind is spreading myself
too thin and not saying no. I have to learn that quitting is leading too. Understanding the
importance of leaving a failed relationship, idea, or task behind is one of the most difficult
decisions one can make but knowing where to delegate your strengths is important (Steng, 2008).
I often find myself thinking leadership occurs overnight and that it is an innate characteristic. I
have to admit that leadership takes time to develop. Just as it takes time for seeds to germinate,
the feeling of empowerment occurs over time. Therefore I have to understand that leadership is
6
an ongoing commitment rather than a one-stop shop (McBride, 2011). After completing the
“Leadership Skills Questionnaire,” my results indicated that my strengths include conceptual
skill, interpersonal skill, and administrative skill. However, I did note that a weakness is
“obtaining and allocating resources is a challenging aspect of my job.”
Leadership plan to overcome obstacles
Before a leader can plan to overcome hardships, he or she must be able to acknowledge
that there are current obstacles and that obstacles are inevitable. Avoiding conflict is not possible
but managing obstacles and producing change is the key to an effective leadership plan
(Northouse, 2012). An effective plan starts with “identifying the skills to be developed and then
zooming in on the “how’s”-that is how to be acquired and how it’s going to be applied and
evident (Lang and Thomas, 2013). No one ever accomplishes success independently, success
can be achieved by reaching mutual goals (Kouzes & Posner, 2002). Before thinking about a
solution, the root of the obstacle must be identified and defined. Effective preparation can work
today as one plans how to cope with that one has to face by anticipating future needs (Cornish,
2004, p.9). Conflict is a struggle between interdependent beings over varying values, beliefs,
self-esteem, control, goals, and connectedness (Northouse, 2012). The “Conflict Style
Questionnaire” examined how I handled conflict in different relationships “A” and “B.”
Relationship “A” was a relationship with a male co-worker and relationship “B” was a personal
relationship. In both relationships I demonstrated an average avoidance, competition, and
collaboration. I was willing to compromise in relationship “A” and I was weak to compromise
in relationship “B.” In relationship “A” I was unwilling to accommodate my co-worker and in
relationship “B” I was willing to accommodate in my personal relationship.
7
A leadership plan includes the understanding of anticipation of opportunities of change
and to quickly adapt to goals and objectives by being responsive to new demands. As a leader I
must learn, decide, listen, and adapt faster than average (Liebowitz, 2008). A leader must be
able to listen to out-group members. Out-group members include individuals who are
disconnected and do not identify themselves as part of a larger group (Northouse, 2012).
Listening to out-group members can offer insight of the existing obstacles. Listening must be the
largest in the listening-to-talk ratio (Kouzes & Posner, 2002). Future leaders need to see
leaders modeling the behavior that they wish to expect (Dennis, Meola & Hall, 2013).
Relationships are built on respect, trust, and good communication which are often initiated when
risks are taken and each person is challenged to try new things (Northhouse, 2012). As a leader,
one must be willing to understand that trust cannot be forced and if someone is not willing to
perceive one as well intentioned or well suited for the task, it may be little that can be
implemented to change his or her perception (Kouzes & Posner, 2002, p.288).
8
References
Banutu-Gomez, M. (2013). The pivotal importance of leadership, knowledge sharing, and organization culture. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 18(2). 238-244
Clawson, J. G. (2006). Level Three Leadership: Getting Below the Surface. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Cornish, E.(2004). Futuring:The exploration of the future. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society
Dennis, D., Meola, D., & Hall, M. (2013). Effective leadership in virtual workforce. Training and Development, 66(12), 46-51
Finzel, H. (2000). The top ten mistakes leaders make. Colorado Springs, CO: Zondervan Publishing House.
Hunter, D. (2013). Wolf in sheep’s clothes: The dark side of charismatic leaders and supportive followers in crisis situations. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge. 18(2), 54-61
Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2002). Leadership the challenge. (3rd edition) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Lang, A. & Thomas, B. (2013). Crossing the canyon from technical expert to first-time leader. Training and Development, 67(3), 36-39
Leicht, C., Randsley de Moura, G., & Crisp, R. (2013). Need for structure predicts leadership preference. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(1), 53-66
Liebowtiz, J. (2008). Think of others in knowledge management: making culture work for you. Knowledge Management Research & Practices, 6, 47-51
McBride, A. (2011). Taking leadership seriously. The American Journal of Nursing, 111(3). 11. doi: 10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395214.70390.fc
Northouse, P. G. (2012). Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rath, T. & Clifton, D. (2009). How full is your bucket?. New York, NY: Gallup Press
Stanley, A. (2003). The next generation leader 5 essentials for those who will shape the future. Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publishers Inc.
Steng, R. (2008 July 9). Mandela: His 8 lessons of leadership. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1821659,00.html
9
The Gallup Organization (personal communication, July 7, 2011)
10