Teaching with Web Apps

38
Michael M. Grant, PhD | Suha Tamim, MPH The University of Memphis Teaching with Web Tools: Characteristics, Implications & Limitations

description

Like the variety of Web 2.0 applications, theories of learning and instructional models are also primarily content independent. So it is left up to the teacher educator to match learner characteristics, content, pedagogy and technologies. This presentation will concentrate on the use of Web 2.0 technologies in contemporary constructivist and cognitivist learning environments. We will present the characteristics of Web 2.0 tools to support teaching and learning, including low threshold applications, a variety of tools and models, as well as access to tools and knowledge. Finally, we will identify the limitations and challenges that exist with using these tools, such as immature applications, longevity of applications, number of applications, unconsolidated services and security and ethics.

Transcript of Teaching with Web Apps

Page 1: Teaching with Web Apps

Michael M. Grant, PhD | Suha Tamim, MPH The University of Memphis

Teaching with�Web Tools: �

Characteristics, Implications &

Limitations

Page 2: Teaching with Web Apps

Michael

M. Grant

Page 3: Teaching with Web Apps

http://viral-notebook.com

Page 4: Teaching with Web Apps

http://bit.ly/unionedforum

Get  it  all  here!  

Page 5: Teaching with Web Apps

3 Questions How does learning occur?

What’s teaching and learning �like with Web 2.0?

What are the challenges �to using Web 2.0?

Page 6: Teaching with Web Apps

How does learning occur?

Page 7: Teaching with Web Apps

Cognitive Learning

Page 8: Teaching with Web Apps

Cognitive Load

Page 9: Teaching with Web Apps

Constructivist Learning

Page 10: Teaching with Web Apps

Assimilation v. Accommodation

Page 11: Teaching with Web Apps

Suha

Tamim

Page 12: Teaching with Web Apps

What’s teaching and learning like with Web 2.0?

Page 13: Teaching with Web Apps

Low Threshold Applications

Page 14: Teaching with Web Apps

“ Low threshold applications are: a)  easy to learn by teachers and students, b)  not intimidating to require re-examination of

teaching practices, c)  Simple enough to require little technical training, d)  almost ubiquitous.

— Gilbert (2002) Teaching, Learning & Technology Group

Page 15: Teaching with Web Apps

“ The technologies that are chosen should be… a)  Those that afford a variety of technical skill

levels among students, b)  Those that allow for the construction and

sharing of learning products. — Sade (2005)

Page 16: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 17: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 18: Teaching with Web Apps

Variety of Tools & Models

Page 19: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 20: Teaching with Web Apps

Lovely Charts Creatly

Mindmeister

Page 21: Teaching with Web Apps

Access to Tools & Knowledge

Page 22: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 23: Teaching with Web Apps

Access to Tools & Knowledge

Page 24: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 25: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 26: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 27: Teaching with Web Apps

What are the challenges to using

Web 2.0?

Page 28: Teaching with Web Apps

Immature Applications

Page 29: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 30: Teaching with Web Apps

Longevity

Page 31: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 32: Teaching with Web Apps

Number of Applications

Page 33: Teaching with Web Apps

Unconsolidated Services

Page 34: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 35: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 36: Teaching with Web Apps

Security & Ethics

Page 37: Teaching with Web Apps
Page 38: Teaching with Web Apps

“ There are strongly mixed reactions about the new technology. Some end users like it (and some love it), but professionals who built a lifetime of skills around the old technology are very suspicious, often undermining it. Even the advocates admit the technology often has to be cajoled into working….Invariably, people just did not realize how hard it was to pull off. What seemed easy and obvious is in fact quite daunting.

— Clark Aldrich (2005) Learning by Doing