Teaching practice in the making: Shaping and reshaping the field … · 2013. 8. 2. · Jacquie...
Transcript of Teaching practice in the making: Shaping and reshaping the field … · 2013. 8. 2. · Jacquie...
Australian Journal of Adult Learning Volume 52, Number 1, April 2012
Teaching practice in the making: Shaping and reshaping the field of adult language, literacy and
numeracy teaching
Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew ChodkiewiczUniversity of Technology, Sydney
The field of adult language, literacy and numeracy in Australia is a site of struggle as policy changes, new learner groups and new economic imperatives challenge teachers’ expertise and beliefs about good teaching practice. This article examines the ways in which experienced adult language, literacy and numeracy teachers shape and reshape their practices within this tricky and treacherous terrain. Using Bourdieu’s analytical tools of field and habitus as a theoretical framework, and Kumaravadivelu’s notion of post-method pedagogy as a lens for observation and interpretation, the paper analyses the ways in which four experienced teachers shape and reshape their classroom practice to create transformative learning for their learners.
10 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
Introduction
Thispaperlooksatamuchexamined,historicalpractice—teaching.Specifically,weseektoexplorehowexpertteachersofadultlanguage,literacyandnumeracycontinuetolearntheirpractice.Teachingpracticeisaslipperyterm:ononelevel,itmaybeseenasamechanisticorprescriptiveaction,onanother,itistakinguptheroleasafacilitator,andonyetanotherlevel,itisaneclecticblendofdifferentapproaches.Howdoteachersnavigateacrossthetrickyandtreacherousterrainofanarguablymuchmalignedpractice?Thesettingofourstudyistheadultlanguage,literacyandnumeracy(LLN)classroom.Ourinterestisinthewayteachingpracticeshapesandisshapedby:theparticularitiesofthesocialspaceoftheclassroom,theparticipants(teachersandlearners),theexternalsocialandpoliticalcontext,andtheteachers’andlearners’interactionwiththeexternalworld,andhowthisshapingandreshapingcreatespossibilitiesoftransformativelearningfortheparticipants.
Theteacherswhosepracticeweexaminearehighlyexperiencedandhaveuniversitydegreequalificationsinarelevantdiscipline.TheyarepartofthegenerationofAustralianadultLLNteacherswhowereacomponentoftheprofessionalisationofapreviouslymorelooselyorganisedandstructuredfield(Scheeres1993;Black1992).Theywouldbedescribedas‘expertteachers’usingthethreedimensionsoftheexpertteacheridentifiedbyTsui(2009:424).Firstly,theydemonstratecapabilitiestointegratevariousaspectsofknowledgeinrelationtotheteachingact;secondly,theyrelatetotheircontextsofworkandtheirunderstandingofteachingsoconstituted;andthirdly,theyexercisetheircapabilitiestoengageinreflectionandconsciousdeliberation.
Inanexaminationofhowexpertteacherscontinuetolearntheirpractice,wecannothelpbutlookatthepowerrelationswithintheteachingfieldandthewaysinwhichlegitimacyisbestowedoncertainkindsofknowledge(meetingsystemsrequirementsandvocationally
Teaching practice in the making 11
focusedcourses)andpractices(approachestoteachingandmodesofwork).
Priya,anEnglishforSpeakersofOtherLanguages(ESOL)teacherteam-teachinginaVocationalEducationandTraining(VET)program,ishighlyattunedtothechangesinthefieldofLLN.Whileshespoketousaboutthestrangenessandnewnessofworkinginamoresubordinatedpositionasalanguagesupportteachertothenowmorevaluedvocationallyfocusedprogram,shedemonstratedhercapacitytoembracethischange.PeterandJeanarealsoteam-teaching,butinavastlydifferentprogram,workingwithyoungpeopleexcludedfromschoolandwork.Annisaliteracyandnumeracyteacherinafurthereducationcollegeandheradultlearnersarestrugglingtolearnconceptsandskillstheymissedatschool.Theseteachersdescribedthedynamicsofthefield,therelationsbetweenandacrossthedispositionstheyasteacherscarriedwith(in)them,thevaluedstakes—inthesecases—thecredentialsthattheparticipantswereworkingtowards,andtheemergingpracticesofboththeteachersandthestudents.
Theabovesnapshotsofchanging/learningpracticesappearpainlesswhenobservingtheteachersintheirclassrooms;yettheteachingfieldisahighlycontestedanduncertainarena.Teachersareengagedinastruggleoverthescarceintellectualresourcesinthefield,thatis,legitimacyintermsofvoiceandparticipation,intellectualandacademiccredibility,economicstakesandeducationalresources.Thestrugglestheteachersinthisstudyengageinarebothinternalandexternaltotheclassroom.Ontheonehand,akeyissueisthatofthewaysinwhichprofessionalexpertise,thatis,intellectualorknowledgecapital(orinBourdieu’s(1992)terms,symboliccapital)isaccumulated.Theteachers’expertiseisrecognisedfromwithinthefield;theywerehighlyrecommendedbytheirprofessionalcolleagues.However,thefieldischangingandtherearecredentialsthatarerequiredbypolicythathavelittleperceivedvaluebyexperienced
12 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
teachersthemselves(forexample,aCertificateIVinTrainingandAssessmentthatismandatedinVETpolicy).Ontheotherhand,thereisthestruggletomaintainandstrengthentheparticularityoftheteaching,tokeepthelearnersinapivotalposition.
WeexaminethisfieldofpracticewiththehelpofBourdieu’sheuristicdevicesoffield,capitalandhabitus(theseconceptsaredescribedinmoredetailinthenextsection)andKumaravadivelu’snotionofteacher’ssense-making,thatis,thewayteachersreflecttherelationshipbetweentheoryandpracticeinpracticalwaysthroughtheirpedagogy.Centraltoouranalysisarethewaysinwhichteachersshapetheirpracticesbynegotiating,managingandsustainingtheinterrelationshipofstudentagencyandteachercontingency(Baynham2006).WefocusonthefourexperiencedandexpertLLNteachersmentionedabovetounderstandthewaystheirteachingpracticesareenacted.Thisisatimelyinvestigation,becauseinAustraliawherethisstudyislocated,thereisasignificantimpetusforreforminworkforcedevelopmentofthevocationaleducationandtrainingworkforce(ProductivityCommission2011;Wheelahan&Moodie2010),andanewnationalstrategyforadultliteracyandnumeracyisinthemaking(FoundationSkillsWorkingGroupSecretariat2011).Thiscomesaftermorethanadecadeofwaitingforanewpolicy(Castleton,Sanguinetti&Falk2001;Black&Yasukawa2010).However,thereformsneedtobeinformedbystudiessuchasthisthatexaminethewaysteachers’interpretationsofthepoliciesintheirpracticesareshapedandreshapedbyanumberofvariables,includingtheirbeliefsaboutteaching,thetheoriesthatinformtheirteaching,theirinterestsinthefield,andmostofalltherelationshipsbetweenthemselvesandtheirlearners.
Asdemonstratedabove,theinhabitants(oragents)oftheteachingfieldsweexplorehereareadiversegroupofexpertteachersinanequallydiverserangeofsettings:anadultnumeracyclassinafurthereducationcollege,anEnglishlanguagecourseintegrated
Teaching practice in the making 13
intoavocationaleducationprogramwithrecentlyarrivedmigrantsfromarangeofculturalandlinguisticbackgrounds,andaprogramforre-engagingyounglearnerswhohaddroppedoutofschool.Ourinitialworkwiththeseteachersgatheredinterviewandvideodataoneffectiveadultlanguage,literacyandnumeracyteaching(Widin,Yasukawa&Chodkiewicz2008;Chodkiewicz,Widin&Yasukawa2010).Thisdatasetisrichinportrayinganarrayofhighlycontextualisedandcontingentteachingpracticealongwiththeteachers’storiesabouttheirpractices.Whilelearners’voiceswerenecessarilypartofourresearchdata,thisarticlefocusesontheteachersandtheirnegotiationoftheirpractice.
We,thewriters,arealsopositionedwithinthefield;twoofusareteachereducatorsintheESOLandLiteracyandNumeracyfield,andoneisaresearcherwithalonghistoryofresearchingwithincommunity-basedlinguisticandculturallydiverseeducationalsettings.
A framework for analysing teaching practices
Teachingpracticeiscomplex,asmentionedearlier.Itcanbeseenasacollectionofmechanisticskillsoratanotherextremeasahighlycontextualisedandnuancedsocio-culturalactivity(Cross2010),withmanyvariationsbetween.WeventuredintothisterritoryunderstandingsomeofitscomplexityandfeelthatBourdieu’s‘thinkingtools’areuseful,explanatorydevicesforwhatisevidentinthefield.Bourdieuseespracticeasaresultoftheinterplaybetweenthreedimensions:field,capitalandhabitus.Thefieldhereistheteachingspace,althoughtheboundariesarenotset;theyshiftaccordingtotherelationshipwiththefieldofpowerandotherrelatedfields.Capital(thevaluedresourcesinthefield)isbothsymbolicandmaterial.IntheLLNfield,thevaluedresourcesincludefunding,qualifications,languageskills,experienceandprofessionalnetworks.Habitusisawayofdiscussingthedeepembodiedtacit
14 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
understandings,thedispositions,oftheagentinaparticularfield.Bourdieudescribeshabitusasmoreanacquiredsenseofwhenandhowtouseculturalknowledgeinaprofitablemanner,ratherthanasasetofpropositions,beliefsoradherencetorules.He(1992:184)writesthat‘practiceistheproductofthehabitus,whichisitselftheproductoftheembodimentoftheimmanentregularitiesandtendenciesoftheworld’.Theteachers’dispositions,whichderiveinpartfromtheirlivedexperiencesandtheirownsocialandculturalhistory,formtheirpersonalnarratives(Cross2010).Allinformandinfluencetheirpractice.
Bourdieu’sworkisofparticularvalueinexaminingateachingcontextandpractice.Hiscentralconcernsrestonthenotionofrelationalpractice,therelationshipbetweenthethree‘thinkingtools’outlinedabove.Teachingexemplifiesthisrelationshipbetweenthesocialstructuresandtheindividualparticipantswhocontinuallyshapeandreshapeeachotheraccordingtotheaccumulationofthevaluedresourcesandrelationsofpower.Bourdieu’sanalyticaltoolshelptomakevisibletheinvisiblerelationsofpowerandtounearththose‘naturally’occurringregularitiesthatbecomeknownas‘thenorm’.ThisstudyofteachersintheadultLLNfieldendeavourstouncovertheinvisiblewebsofdominantandsubordinaterelationshipswhichcausethepracticestobecarriedoutinacertainway.Giventhatthefieldofpublically-funded,adultLLNeducationiswroughtwithstrugglesaroundfunding,qualifications,intellectuallegitimacyandpublicperceptionsofteachersandteachingpractices,inparticulartheon-goingdevaluingandde-professionalisationofteachers’practices(Black2010),Bourdieu’sconceptsallowustounderstandhowthissociallyimportantendeavourchangesandendures.
Inafield,inhabitedbypowerfulartefactsandparticipantsasalludedtoabove,teachersaremostoftenbeholdentothe‘doxa’,thatis,thedominantsetofbeliefsandvaluesofthefield.InBourdieu’s(1998:57)words,thisis‘aparticularpointofview,thepointofview
Teaching practice in the making 15
ofthedominant’.IntheadultLLNfieldthedoxaisrepresentedbythefundingpoliciesandcurriculumanditisunlikelythatclassroomteachers’(localised)knowledgeorpracticescanchangethestructureofdominantpracticesandlegitimateknowledge(Bourdieu&Eagleton1992:119).Anissueofgreatinterestinthisstudyishowtheteachersareabletocomplywiththedominantviewprojectedbytheirinstitutions,whileatthesametimepractiseinwaysthatrecognisetheiruniquesituation.Therangeof‘knowledges’accumulatedbytheteachersinourstudycomefromtheirabilitytoattendtotheparticularitiesoftheirteachingcontextandtobeopentoadaptandchange(learn)theirpracticeswhichareconceivedanddevelopedthroughtheirownsensemaking(Kumaravadivelu2003).Buthowisthislearningrecognisedandvalued?
Bourdieuprovidestherelationalframeworktoexaminethepowerrelationsandfeaturesofthefield,whileKumaravadivelu(2003)offersusawaytoexamineteacherlearningattheleveloftheclassroomandinteractionswiththestudents.Hisframeworkforteacherdevelopmentconteststhetraditionalnotionoflocatingteacher‘training’withinthemaster-apprenticeshipmodelandthetransmissionofknowledgeasakeyteachingapproach.Heputsforwardanapproachwhichequipsteacherswiththeresourcestodeviseapersonaltheoryofpracticebasedonanhermeneuticprincipleof‘situationalunderstanding’,thatis,thatallpedagogyislocalandteachersmustbeawareoflocalexigencieswhichimpactontheirteaching.Heiscentrallyconcernedaboutthe‘once-and-for-allsetofauthorizedpractices’(McMorrow2007:375)thatsometeacherstakeawayfromteachertrainingprograms;formanyteachers,thesesetupaframeworkofthewaytoengageinanyfurtherprofessionaldevelopmentandbuild(ornot)relationshipswiththeirstudents.These‘authorisedpractices’oftentaketheformofaparticularteachingmethodology.
16 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
Kumaravadivelu’s(2003)‘postmethodpedagogy’dispenseswiththeideathatthereisateachingmethodthatwillsuitallcontextsatalltimes.Hisbroaderteacherdevelopmentframeworkrestsonthreepedagogicparameters:particularity,practicalityandpossibility.Theparameterofparticularitytakesintoaccounttheparticularneedsandparticularcontextofthelearnerswhenmakingdecisionsabouthowandwhattoteach.Thatofpracticalityrecognisesandacknowledgestheteacher’ssense-making,thatis,theteacher-generatedtheoryofpracticewhichinformsandisinformedbyteaching.Thissense-makingseestheclassroomwallsaspermeable;thelearnersaresituatedwithinthecontextthatexistsoutsideoftheclassroom.Thethirdparameterofpossibilitytakesaccountofthesocio-politicalworldandisthedimensionwhichisconcernedwithidentityandsocialtransformation.Theteachercannotfulfiltheirpedagogicobligationswithoutatthesametimefulfillingtheirsocialobligations.Theymustbeawareofboththesocio-politicalandculturalrealitythatshapestheirlivesandoftheircapacitytotransformtheirownandtheirstudents’realities.
Kumaravadivelu’sparametersareinterwovenandoverlap;theyeachshapeandareshapedbytheother(2003:34–36).Theseparametersassistustoanalyseanddiscussthestrugglesandtensionsintheteachingfieldandhowtheyshape(reshape)teachingpractice.ItisclearthatalltheteachersinthisstudyintuitivelyoperatedfromwithinthethreedimensionsofKumaravadivelu’sframework.OurbriefintroductionofPriyaaboveshowshowsheoperatedfromtheparticularitiesandpracticalitiesofherteachingcontext;furtheron,weexaminethepossibilities.WhatarethevaluedresourcesthatPriyahasaccumulatedinthefield?Howdotheyenablehertoshapeandreshapeherpractice?Whatotherresourcescomeintoplay?Baynham(2006)providesacomplementaryanalyticaltoolinhisexaminationofthewaysteachersbringin,negotiateandmediatethelearners’externalworlds.Heusesthetermsstudentagencyand
Teaching practice in the making 17
teachercontingencytodescribethewayteachersareabletoidentifyandrespondtothestudent‘irruptions’(Baynham2006);theseallowteacherstoopenupthelearningspace,inviting‘irregularartefacts’intotheclassroomandreshapingtheteachingpractices.
Alloftheteachersinthisstudyhaddevelopedconsiderableculturalcapital(qualifications,professionaldevelopment)todrawonfromthedisciplinaryknowledgethattheygainedintheirformalstudy,aswellastheirknowledgeandwaysofnavigatingthroughtheofficialinstitutional,policyandcurriculumrequirements.Butwhatalltheteacherssaidtheyvaluedandrelieduponmostwastheirknowledgeandexperienceofdialogicapproachestolearning,inordertorespondincontingentandpracticalwaystotheneedsoftheirlearnersastheyarose.Thiswasexemplifiedthroughtheirwillingnesstousewhatthelearnersbroughtfromtheirworldsofwork,communityandhomeasteachablemomentsintheirclasses,orinexercisingtimelyandspontaneousdivisionoflabourwiththeteamteacherinresponsetounexpectedsituations.
Thewillingnessandskillsoftheteacherstorespondtotheparticularitiesofthesituationsinpracticalwayswasalsoseentoleadtocreatingnewpossibilitiesforboththelearnersandtheteachersthemselves.InaBourdieuiansense,theteachersareattemptingtocounterthesymbolicviolenceinherentinanyteachingsituation.Symbolicviolenceisdescribedasbeingcarriedoutbyimposingmeaningsas‘legitimatebyconcealingthepowerrelationswhicharethebasisofitsforce’andatthesametimecommunicatingalogicorrhetoricofdisinterest(Bourdieu&Passeron1977:4).Therefore,whenteachersteachEnglishoraretaughttoteachEnglish,theyarefundamentallytryingtoimpose‘culturallyarbitrary’conditionsbyanarbitrarypower(p.18)undertheguiseoflegitimateorder.Laterinthispaper,wegiveanopportunityfortheteacherstospeakabouthowtheirpracticescontinuallyevolveandtransform,andinturntranspose,insomecases,theirteacherdispositions.
18 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
Learning in a changing field
Ourinquiryherefocusesonhowteachingpracticeisshapedandinturnshapesthefield.Currentresearchwhichinvestigateshowlanguage,literacyandnumeracyteacherslearntheirpracticeoftenfocusesontheteacher’spriorbeliefs,theteacher’scoursework(teachertraining)andfieldexperience;andwhatteachersdoduringtheirfirstyearsofteaching(Morton,McGuire&Baynham2006).Researchonteacherlearningisalsodividedintotwomajorresearchfields(Richards&Placier2001):thefirsthasafocusontheindividualteacherlearning,andthesecondfocusesontheschoolasacontextforteachingandlearning.Thesetwofieldsofresearcharemostoftenkeptseparate,andsofartheresearchdoesnotshowhowtheyinterrelate(Hoesktraetal.2009),whereasinourcurrentstudythesetwofieldsareseentogether,involvedinadynamicrelationship.Hoesktraetal.(2009:280)drawattentiontowhetherthe‘conditionsforlearning’areavailabletoteachersintheirworkplacesandthatteachers’perceptionsoflearningarecontingentonconditionssuchasteacherstatus,teacherautonomy,teachercollaboration,reflectivedialogue,receivingfeedbackandexperienceofsharednormsandresponsibilityintheteachingsite.
Groundwater-SmithandMockler(2009)identifyfouraspectsofthecurrentorthodoxiesinAustralianeducationincludingtheriseofauditcultures,thestandardisationofpractice,thediminishmentofteacherprofessionaljudgment,andthe‘quality’agendaineducation.Inthefieldofadultliteracyandnumeracy,Tusting(2009)examinesthestrugglesteachersintheUKexperienceinafieldsimilarlycharacterisedbytheseorthodoxies,whileinAustraliaBlack(2010)focusesonthephenomenonoftherising‘auditcultures’andexaminesthedifferentwaysinwhichAustralianteachersarerespondingtoincreasingpressuresforcomplianceinareassuchascurriculumdevelopmentandassessment,aspectsoftheirworkon
Teaching practice in the making 19
whichteachersinthepastwereabletoexercisegreaterprofessionaljudgementandautonomy.
Groundwater-SmithandMockler(2009:136–7)proposedifferentmodelsofpractitioner-basedinquiryaswaysinwhichteacherscanmakesenseoftheorthodoxiesand‘closethegap’betweentheirown‘moralauthorityandmoralagency’andtheexternalpressuresimposeduponthem.However,asHoekstraetal.(2009)pointout,variablessuchasteachers’employmentsecurityandthecultureoftheworkplaceinwhichtheyarelocatedcansignificantlylimittheinfluenceandthepossibilitiesofsuchformsofprofessionallearning.Inlightoftheseobservations,thewaysinwhichtheteachersinourstudymakesenseoftheircomplexterrainsseemevenmoreremarkable.
IntheirresearchonchangeandteachingpracticesintheTeachingEnglishtoSpeakersofOtherLanguages(TESOL)field,BurnsanddeSilvaJoyce(2007)positthecurriculumastheartefactwhichshapesandreshapesLLNteachingpractices.Thisartefactistherealisationofstruggleswithingovernmentpolicy,ideology,legitimationofknowledgeandpositioningofthelearnersandteachers.ThecurriculumhastakenmanyformsoverthelastfourdecadesinAustralia—fromtext-booktoskeletaloutlinestodetailedspecificationsthatfocusparticularlyonexternally-validatedassessment.
TheaboveresearchpointstosignificantfeaturesoftheadultLLNfieldasabroadentity;withintheclassroomsstudiedhere,keyfeaturesinteractandhelptoshapeteachingpractice.Theyincludeteacher’sbeliefs,theirtrainingandexperience,thecontextoftheteachers’work,andthecurriculum.Thesefeaturesareoftenseentooperateassingleelementsinthefield,andnotnecessarilyasdynamicsoras‘shiftingvariables’astheyoftenare.
20 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
Theconceptof‘figuredworlds’(Holland&Bartlett2002;Baynham2006)isusefulheretorefertotheclassrooms.Theseworldsexistwithinafieldandtheyareconstructedandpopulatedbyagentsandartefactsthat,throughtheirinteractions,invokepractice.Artefactshavethepossibilityofbeingfleeting(forexample,spokenlanguage)orlong-lasting(forexample,teachingresources).Studentirruptionscanbeviewedasatransientartefact,buttheyareartefactsthattogetherwithteachercontingencycanbecomeapowerfulforceinshapingpractice.WeconceptualisetheLLNfield(boththeclassroomandthebroaderfield)asacomplexentitywithsetsofbothcompetingandcontrastingforcesandinterests.Figure1displaysthevariables,includingtheagentsandartefactsintheteachingspace.
Figure 1: Conceptualising the LLN field
Itisdifficulttocapturethepositionofthevariablesandthewaytheyshiftinatwodimensionaldiagram.However,thismultifaceted,thoughnotexhaustive,mapprovidessomeinsightintothecomplexityofthefieldandtheinfluencesandforceswhichactupontheteacherandwhichtheteacherinturnactsupon.Wehavenotmappedthe
Teaching practice in the making 21
fieldinamannerthatissimilartoBourdieu—thisisbeyondthescopeofthispaper.Rather,thefigureisanattempttoshowthatteachingpracticeisnotanisolatedorneutralact.Infact,itisadimensionofthisparticularfieldandteachersarebeholdentochangesinthefieldandsubsequently‘learnnewpractice’inwaysthataresometimesdifficulttoname.Wedonotclaimtocapturealltheelementsofthefield,ofwhichteaching,fromanotherresearchperspective,mayalsobeanelement.TheelementsinFigure1arenotstatic;theyareimpactedandinfluencedbytheshiftingdynamicsandboundariesofotherfields.Policyisasignificantartefactinthisfield,akey‘socio-culturaltool’(Cross2010:441)thatisinplaywiththesocialactivitieswithinthe‘cultural-historicdomain’(Cross2010:441);policiesinfluencethewayteachersdowhattheydo.Clearly,changeswithininstitutionsresultingfrompolicychanges,suchasashiftfromanaccessandgeneraleducationfocustoamorevocationaleducationandtrainingfocusduetobroaderlabourmarketshifts,meanthatteachershavetolearncontinuallyhowtoworkwithnewlearnerswithpreviouslyunfamiliarcultural,linguisticand/oreducationalsettingsandgoals.Ouranalysisofthisfieldaims,asstatedearlier,tomaketheseforcesofchangevisible.Theteachersinourstudyshowhowtheynavigatetheirever-changingterrainandhowtheirpracticesshiftwiththeboundariesofthefield.
The agents in the field
Figure1showsthattheteacherswhomwearestudyingaresituatedinadynamicfieldandarecreatingandrenewingtheirpracticewithinaparticularpolicycontext,bringingwiththemtheirparticulardispositions,theirhistoriesandbeliefsaboutwhatitmeanstobeateacher,andwhatLLNlearningcanmeanforthelearnerswithwhomtheywork.
Thecurrentpictureofthefield,onethatisdominatedbydiscoursesofcompetenciesandoutcomes,accountabilityaudits,employability
22 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
andcredentials,isinsharpcontrasttothewaysofworkingthatmanyoftheseteachersfirstencounteredinthefieldwhenAdultBasicEducation(ABE)andEnglishlanguageeducation‘feltlikeagrassrootsmovement—abandofpeopleworkingtogethertowardsacommongood’(NSWALNC2009:28).Thefieldisnowfarfromwhatcouldbecalledagrassrootsmovement.LLNteachers’professionalautonomyischallengedbyacultureofinternalandexternalauditsthatlegitimiseteachercomplianceoveragency(Black2010).Thecurriculumthatwasinthepastaprocessofnegotiationbetweenthelearnersandtheteacherhasincreasinglybecomea‘product’basedonunitsofexternallydeterminedcompetenciesandoutcomesemphasisingvocationalandemploymentoutcomes.Asmentionedearlierinthispaper,curriculumisoftenseenasthedriverofchangeandteacherlearning;however,aswedemonstrate,thefieldiscomplicatedand,whilecurriculumisapowerfulelement,itismediatedbythedispositionsthatteachersbringtoandtakeoninthefield.Forexample,whena‘nationalsnapshot’oftheadultliteracyandnumeracyfieldwastakenin2001,itwasfoundthatteachersheldstronglytoaviewofliteracyas‘afundamentalhumanrightandameansofempowermentforindividuals’(McGuirk2001:3).Manyteacherscontinuetofindwaystocreatemeaningfullearningfortheirlearnerswiththediminishingdegreeofautonomytheyhave(Yasukawa2008).
Anoverarchingfeatureofthisdynamicfieldishowtheteachers’andlearners’dispositionstransposeinrelationtotheshiftsinthevaluedstakes(capital).Clearly,theteachersandlearnerstakeonthedoxaofthefield:vocationaloutcomes,certification/credentialing,andmovementbetweentypesofprovisionforspecificpurposes.Whatdotheseteachersretainandsustainacrossthesechangesinthevaluedcapital?Ourstudyshowsthattheteachers’corevaluesandbeliefsaroundtheparticularitiesofthelearnersandtheteachingsitesandtheircontinuedsense-making(learning),thepracticalityandtheiropportunitiestoopenuppossibilitieswerethekey
Teaching practice in the making 23
sustainableelements;theyexhibitinthepracticetheparametersofwhatKumaravadivelucalls’post-methodpedagogy’(2003:23).Inthefollowingsections,weexaminetheteachers’practicesthroughthislens.
A practice of continual renewal and reshaping
Astrong,commonthemeemergedinourinterviewsandobservationsoftheexperiencedteachersinthisstudy—anESOLteacheronaVETprogram,twoteachersteamteachingwithyoungpeoplewhohaddroppedoutofschool,andaliteracyandnumeracyteacherinatechnicalcollege.Althoughexpressedinslightlydifferentlanguage,inresponsetothequestionofwhatmakesgoodpracticeinadultLLN/ESOL,alloftheseteachersspokeaboutparticularity,theestablishmentofaproductiveandinclusiverelationshipwiththeirlearnersastheprimaryconcernandaimoftheirpractice.Noneoftheteachersreferredtoanyspecificmethodortheoryasdefiningordeterminingtheirpractice.UsingthewordsofNoddings(2003:249),theseteacherssawteachingasa‘relationalpractice’,thatis:
Teachingisthoroughlyrelational,andmanyofitsgoodsarerelational:thefeelingofsafetyinathoughtfulteacher’sclassroom,agrowingintellectualenthusiasminbothteacherandstudent,thechallengeandsatisfactionsacredbybothinengagingnewmaterial,theawakeningsense(forboth)thatteachingandlifearenever-endingmoralquests.
However,therelationalpracticefortheseteachersisnota-theoreticalorarbitrary.Ourdataprovideevidenceoftheseteachers’practiceasbeingformed,reformedandchallengedbydifferingaccumulationsofcapitalandinteractionswiththehabitusinthefield.
Theaspectofrespondingtotheparticularityofthepolicyandlearnercontextswasexhibitedindifferentwaysinthethreesites.Overall,astrikingcharacteristicoftheteacherswasthewaytheirhabitushadbecomefinelyattunedtothestakes(valuedcapital)ofthefieldto
24 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
operatestrategically.Priyafoundherselfworkingintheincreasinglyvocationally-focusedenvironmentwherelanguageandliteracyteachingandlearningwasintegratedintotheteachingofvocationalknowledgeandskills.Priya’shabitushasclearlybeenoneofanESOLteacher;thechangesinthefieldmeantthatshehadtolearnnewwaysofworking.Previouslyshetaughtalone,focusingongeneralEnglishlanguageskillsandknowledge;inthisnewrole,shewaspositionedasalearnersupportteacher,team-teachingwiththevocationalteacherinanaccreditedvocationalcourse.PeterandJeanwerelearningtoworkwithpeoplewhoareoftenspokenaboutas‘atrisk’studentsinacommunityyouthcentre.Herethelearningalsoinvolvedteam-teachingasawaytoprovidegreaterdegreesofresponsivenesstolearnerswithmultiplelearningneeds,andworkingwithvolunteerswhoprovidedfurthersupportandenabledeachlearner’sindividualgoalstobenegotiatedandachieved.Atthethirdsite,Annwasclearinherphilosophyofteaching.Sheshowedthatteachingwasaboutknowingandrespondingtolearners’individualgoalsandneeds.Whatwasspecifiedinthesyllabuswasimportant,butithadtobebalancedagainsttheneedsandabilitiesofthelearners.Inallthreesites,theteachersdemonstratedhowtheywereattunedtothechangingcircumstancesoftheirlearners,andhowtheygainedasenseofthegame,orinotherwords,asenseof(aparticular)reality.
Whatfollowsaresomeselectedobservationsfromthethreesitestoillustratethemanifestationsoftheaspectsofparticularity,practicalityandpossibilitiesintheteachers’pedagogy.Wealsopointtothewaystheteachersactcontingentlybybringinginthelearners’externalworldsandencouragingstudentagency.
Reshaping habitus in a VET classroom
ThefirstsitethatwestudiedwasatacommunitycollegewherePriya,anESOLteacher,wasteam-teachingwithAmy,avocationalteacherinthechildren’sservicescourse.Theirstudentswererecentlyarrivedyoungmigrantwomenwhowerestudyingtowardsavocational
Teaching practice in the making 25
qualificationinchildren’sservices.AlthoughPriyahadmanyyearsofexperienceasanESOLteacher,workinginseveraldifferentcountrieswithstudentsfromdiversecultures,herteam-teachingwithAmyinvolvedaprocessoflearninganewteachingpractice.ThispracticereflectedboththecurrentpolicyfocusonLLNprovidersformingpartnershipswithVETproviders,communityservicesandindustry,andonsupportingtheintegrateddevelopmentofLLNskillswithinVETprograms.Bothteacherssawthevalueofworkingtogetherasawayofsupportingthestudents’learning:
BothofushavebeenabletoworkwellasateamIthinkbecausebothofushaveagreatpassionforhelpingourstudents...andbothofushaveacommongoal...It’stakenalotoftrialanderrorformebecauseitwasoneofthefirstcourseswhereIwasteam-teaching,butIthinkattheendofitIcanseethatit’sbeenreallyvaluable...it’sbeenreallyinteresting,challengingattimes,especiallyatthebeginningbecauseI‘vebeensousedtojustbeingoutthereinthefront...I’vegottoreallysitdownandunderstandtheneedsofthestudents,that’sreallyimportant.Itcanbechallengingattimesbutithasbeenfulfillingbecausewecanseethemworkingtowardsthecommonaimofachievingtwocertificates.[Priya]
Iworkveryhardtomakeeveryonefeelpartofthegroup.WhenIstartIfinditdifficult.Idon’tgetalotoffeedbackfromthem...I’mnotsureifI’mgettingthroughmypointsornot...Idon’thavetimetostandandexplaineverything.Ihavetoexplaincoursecontent,sothat’swherePriya’sbeenexcellent.ShewillpickupandtakenotesifIhavementionedsomethingandthegirlsdon’tunderstand.Shewilltakethatonboardandcomeinhersessionwithdetailedinformation.[Amy]
WhiletheparticularpolicycontextofthefieldmighthavepushedPriyatoworkinthisnewway,herpracticeinthisteam-teachingcontextdrewheavilyonherownpriorexperienceandknowledgeofworkingwithculturallydiverselearners(herhabitus).Theyenabledhertomakesenseofthelearners’situationsandexperiences:
26 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
MyawarenessoftheChineseculture,Indiancultureandothercultureshashelpedmegreatly,becausewhenIteachthemthelanguageaspectsI’mabletorelatealwaystotheculturalaspects.[Priya]
Alongwithherculturalawarenessandknowledge,Priyarecognisedthelinguisticcapitalheldbyherbilingualstudents.Priyagaveexplicitvaluetothiscapital.Studentswereencouragedtousetheirfirstlanguagesinclass,asshesawthatthisfacilitatedgreatercommunicationandunderstandingwithingroupsofstudents.ItenabledthosemoreproficientinEnglishtoexplainunfamiliarconceptstoothersandthestudentscouldmoreeasilycompareandcontrastpracticesintheAustralianVETcontextwiththoseintheirhomecountry.Inthisway,shewasencouragingandfacilitatingstudentagency.Shealsorespondedtothepressuresintheexternalworldsonthesestudents’livesthroughouttheprogram:listening,modifyingandnegotiatingwithlearnersasissuesarosethatimpactedontheirabilitytoattendordofollow-upwork.Inmanywayssheactedcontingently,balancingmultiplesetsoffactorsbothwithinandoutsidetheclassroom.Thedistributionofthelinguisticresourcesherealsohelpedreshapethefield,especiallywhenstudentswereusingtheirfirstlanguages.
ThedynamicnatureofthefieldisalsoreflectedbytheVETteacher’spositionalsochanging:Amy’sdispositionsasateacherwerealtered,andPriya,proficientinsomeofthelanguagesofthestudents,tookupanewposition.Theteam-teachingpractice,basedonaverticalhierarchywithAmyasthemainteacherandPriyaasthesupportteacher,shiftedoverthetimeoftheirworkingtogether.WhilePriyawasobviouslyopentothechangingdynamicsofthefieldandsawsomevalueinworkingwiththemorevocationally-orientatedcurriculumandthebenefitsthatrecognised(legitimated)credentialscanbringtothelearners,shewashoweveruncompromisinginherbeliefsaboutteachingandsoughttomaintainthelearners’needsasaprimedriverofherpractice.
Teaching practice in the making 27
InPriya’spositionofprovidinglanguageandliteracysupport,whatwesawwasbothateacherwhoseownhabituswasbeingtransposedfromthatofthesoleEnglishlanguageteachertoateamteacherinaVETcoursethroughtheparticularpolicycontextinwhichshefoundherself,andateacherwhowascontingentandkeentoencouragestudentagency,drawingonherstrongidentificationwithdifferentculturalgroupstocreatenewpossibilitiesforthelearnersfromdiverseculturalbackgroundstolearn,liveandworkinAustraliansociety.
Creating possibilities of a new habitus for the learners
ThesecondsiteofourresearchtookustoacommunityyouthcentrewhereanABEteacher,Jean,workedwithanOutreachcoordinator,Peter.BothJeanandPeterwereexperiencedinteachingliteracyandnumeracytoarangeofyoungandolderadultlearners.Atthissite,JeanandPeterwereworkingwithagroupofyoung,mainlyIndigenouslearnerswhohaddisengagedfromformalschooling.Thelearnersweretakingpartintheprogramwiththeclearaimofcompletingschoolsubjectsandworkingtowardsgainingformalschoolqualifications,includingtheiryear10SchoolCertificate.Asdiscussedmorefullyinanearlierpaperaboutthisparticularsite(Chodkiewicz,Widin&Yasukawa2010),theprogramatthissitewasonethathadwhatNoddings(2003)wouldcall‘moral’orinternalvaluefortheteachersandthelearners,butnotnecessarilyonethatcarriedexternallyrecognisedvalue.
Theprogramwasapartnershipprogrambetweentwosectionsofafurthereducationcollegeandalocalcommunityyouthcentre,andwasfundedinpartbyaphilanthropicorganisation.ThecommunityyouthcentrewasphysicallydesignedandfurnishedwiththecoloursoftheAustralianAboriginalflag,withanindoorbasketballarea,anddifferentkindsoflearningspacestoallowlearnerstoworkindifferentconfigurationsaccordingtotheirneeds.Bothteachersexpressedastrongcommitmenttohelpinglearnersovercomethe
28 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
negativeexperiencesthatmostofthemhadencounteredduringtheirschoolyears:
...weactuallyofferanopportunityforstudentstocomehereandmaintainorrenegewithoutthenecessityofmeetingthetraditionalyear7oryear8scheduling...sowewouldthensay,OK,wehaveastudentwhohaswalkedinwhodoesn’twanttobeoutthereonthestreet,whocannotsurviveinthenormalschoolenvironment.Whatwewilldoisjustfacilitatetheirlearningandpromotetheirlearningandbringthemslowlybacktothepathofapropereducation...Ourkeyingredientforsuccessisyoucanwalkineightmonthsintotheyearandwewilltakeyouinandlookatyourliteracy,numeracyandyourvocationpathway,tryandestablishafirmfootingfromwhichtorebuild.[Peter]
...andsomestudentsarealittlebitreticenttospeakoutwhenthere’sotherlouderkids.[We]givethemachanceandencouragethemtoparticipate.[Jean]
Theirpracticewasconsistentwiththeirexpressedbeliefsaboutteaching—thedispositionsthattheybroughtfromotherteachingcontexts.However,theirpracticealsohadtochangeandtheyhadtolearnnewwaysofworkinginthiscontext,respondingtotheparticularitiesandpossibilitiesatthissite.Theirdispositionsweresuchthatthelearnerwascentraltotheirteachingpractice.Inonesense,thiswasfamiliarterritoryforbothteachersandtheycontinuedtofocusonhowtoremaincontingentandaccommodatethelearners’needsinthisnewcontext—onethatwasoftenimpactedondirectlybythelearners’externalworld.Thisoftenmeantdealingwithconfrontinglearnerbehavioursandtryingtofindwaysthatrespondedpositivelyforthelearner,otherlearnersandthemselves.Thisinvolvedlearningnewwaysofworking,inparticular,howtoengagemorefullyinapartnershipwitheachother,thelearnersandthevolunteers,andtoworkwithmaterialsandapproachesthatwereseeminglyantitheticaltoalearner-centredapproach.Anotherimportantfeatureofthissitewasthatlearnerstookonamoredeterminingrole.Initiallytheyhadrequestedthatthecentreoffera
Teaching practice in the making 29
programwheretheycouldworktowardsaschoolcertificatecredentialanditwasoftentheirinterestsandconcernsthatwerethekeytotheshapingofnewteachingpracticesinthisteachingsite.
Theteachersexplainedthatsometimestheyhadtothrowawaythemethodsortheoriestheyhadlearnedintheirteachereducationdiplomas‘andreactinacertainwaytoacertainsituation’[Peter].Thiswasbecausetheirteachingenvironmentwasimpactedbytheregularandon-goinginstabilitiesandpressuresinthelearners’livesoutsidetheclassroom.Thepracticeofteam-teachingthattheyweredevelopingmadeasignificantdifferencetohowtheycopedinthesesituations.
Ithinkweworkwellasateam.Webringdifferentstrengths,weaknesses,alsodifferentexperiences...AndIthinkwecomplementeachother.It’salsoagainamatteroftrustbetweenus.SometimesPeterhasanideaandIthinkIhadn’tthoughtaboutthat…gowiththat...giveitatryandmutuallylikethat.AndIthinkwecanalsodoalittledivisionoflabournowinthegroup.I’dbeworkingwiththestudentsmoreontheliteracyandnumeracy,andPeterwillbeworkingmorewiththestudentsdoingdistanceed.,thenwebringthemalltogether...Ithinkthatworksprettywell.[Jean]
IthinkJeanmightlookatmemoreasthedeliverersometimes,certainlyJeangivesmethematerialtodeliver...AndIthinkbecauseofmyexperienceofworkingwithkidsfromthisagebracketforsuchalongtime,youcanhandmesomethingandIcanjusttakeoffwithit.[Peter]
JeanandPeteralsotalkedabouthowtheylearnedasateamtodealwithsituationswhenlearnersmightarriveexpressingalotofangerandfrustration.Oftentheyweretheresultofextremeeventsthatoccurredintheirlivesoutsidetheteachingspace.
Andsometimesthere’sissuesofangermanagement,too,andthat’sverygoodwhenwe’reateam...Wehavelittlecues;...sometimesPetermightsaythatwe’llleavethator[we]mightsort
30 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
ofhaveawordtooneanother...IfeelverysupportedbyPeterinthosesituations.[Jean]
Therearetimes,Iknow,thatwhenastudentisangrywithmeandJeancansenseit,obviouslyatthesametimeandIcanmovethestudenttowardsJeanorJeancanmovethestudenttowardsmyself.[Peter]
Wesawatthissitethepracticalityoftheirteachingpractice.Theteachersbothhadastronglyarticulatedphilosophyofteachingthatwasbasedonsupportingtheirlearnerstoengageproductivelyinlearning.Thisphilosophywastranslatedintotheirpracticethroughtherelationshipthattheyhadbuiltbetweenthetwoofthem,whichinturnstrengthenedtheirrelationshipswiththelearners.Throughouteachsessioninone-on-oneandgroupwork,bothteachersshowedahighdegreeofcontingencyintheirawarenessandresponsetostudent‘irruptions’.Thisinturncreatedpossibilitiesforthelearnerstoexerciseagencyandassumethekindofacademicidentitythattheyhadneverexperiencedpriortoengaginginthisprogram.
Building teaching practice from knowing the learners
ThethirdsitewasanABEclassconsistingofsixlearnersbeingledbyAnninacourseonnumeracy.Theclassconsistedoffivemenandonewoman,whomAnndescribedasbeingveryweakintheirliteracyandnumeracyskills,somewithmildlearningdifficulties,andwhohadexperienceddisruptedschoollearning.Inthissite,wesawhowtheteacherwascontinuallyshapingandreshapingherpracticeinresponsetowhatshewaslearningaboutherlearners:
Themainthingreallyistoknowmystudents,toreallyknowandunderstandwherethey’recomingfrom,whattheirlearningdifficultiesare,wheretheirweaknessesandtheirstrengthsare.
AfewminutesbeforeherMondayclassstarted,wesawAnntalkingtothestudentswhowerewaitingoutsidetheclassroom,greetingeachstudentbynameandaskingthemwhattheyhaddoneontheirweekend.Duringtheclass,sheoftenactedcontingently—looking
Teaching practice in the making 31
forandcreatingfurtheropportunitiesforlearnerstoexerciseagencybyelicitingtheirknowledgeandexperiencefromoutsidetheclassroom,oftheconceptsandskillsshewasteaching,forexample,measurementofdifferentkindsofquantities:time,lengthandtemperature.Intheseinstances,thelearnersrevealednotjustwhattheyknew,butalsowhotheywere.Thisrelationshiplegitimatedthelearnersasvaluedparticipantsinthefield.Adiscussionaboutanalogueversusdigitalclockspromptedonestudent,Ahmed,arecentlyarrivedrefugeefromGuinea-Bissau,whohadfledhishomeland,spentyearsinarefugeecampandonlyrecentlytakenupformalstudy,topulloutawatchandlaunchintoastoryabouttheverypersonalsignificanceofthewatchbecauseitwasaveryspecialwatchtohim.
It’sapresentfrommydad,longtimeago.That’swhyIkeepitgood.Ineverevenwearit...someday,Imightgiveittomyson.[Ahmed]
AnnallowedtimeforAhmedtotellthisstory,givingnon-verbalcuesofherrespectforthesignificanceofthisartefacttothelearner.Shethenwalkedtoeachoftheotherlearnersintheroomtoallowthemtosaysomethingabouttheirwatchtotheothermembersoftheclass.Shethenusedtheuncertaintyshownbythelastlearneraboutthekindofwatchhehadtotakethegroupbacktotheofficialcurriculumof‘measuringtime’.Inalaterstageofthesamelesson,whensheintroducedthetopicofmeasuringlengths,sheturnedtothelearnerJim:
Ann:Jim,you’vedonequitealotofmeasurement,haven’tyou?
Jim:Yeah,whenIdidmyhorticulturecourse,measuringgardenbedsandstuff.
Througheachoftheseexchanges,Annisbuildingandtestingherownknowledgeaboutthelearnersinordertoshapeherpracticetomeetthelearners’needs,becauseasshesaysinherinterview:
32 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
IhaveinmyheadexactlywhatIwanttodoandonpaperI’llhaveaverybriefflowchartjusttoremindmeontheareasthatIwanttoaddressforthelessonandIhaveresourcespreparedforthat.ButIknowthat,oncethelessonstarts,thestudents’needswillcometothesurfaceandtheirinterestswillstarttosurfaceandIneedtogowiththat...It’saboutbeingrelevantandresponsivetothestudents...it’saboutbeingverysubtleand,Isuppose,gentlewiththestudents.IthinkoneofthereallyimportantthingsthatunderpinsmyteachingisthefactthatI’mteachingstudentsandI’mnotteachingthesyllabus.IfIcomefromthepointofviewofthestudents,it’llallfallintoplacebecausethat’stheunderpinningtheorythatIworkon.[Ann]
Ann’sexplanationofherteachingpracticereflectswhatKumaravadivelu(2003:35)saysabouttheneedfora‘continualcycleofobservation,reflection,andactionasaprerequisiteforthedevelopmentofcontext-sensitivepedagogictheoryandpractice’.ThecoherencebetweenAnn’sespousedtheoryandherpracticemeansthathertheoryofalearner-centredpedagogyhaspracticalmanifestations.Herpedagogyshiftsthelearners,inBourdieu’sterms,toamuchlesssubordinatedpositioninthefieldandaffordsvaluetotheknowledgeandskillstheybringtotheclass,whileatthesametimecreatingnewpossibilitiesforthelearners.Fromthelearners’perspectives,theclassroomasafieldmayoperateinaverydifferentwaytotheirexternalworldswheretheymayoccupymuchmoresubordinatedpositions.Ininterviews,thelearnerstalkedaboutthebenefitsofboththeself-confidencetheyhadgainedaswellastheskillsandknowledgethattheyhadlearnedfortheirfuture—infurtherstudy,inemploymentandintheireverydaylife.Andbeyondtheconfidence,skillsandknowledgethatthelearnerswerebuildingthroughthiscourse,Annandthestudentswerebuildingasafelearningspaceinwhichthelearnerstalkedabouteachotheras
...verygood.Wehaveaveryfriendlyclass,verynicepeople...I’mverycomfortable.[Marie]
Teaching practice in the making 33
Myclassmatesarereallyfriendlypeople.Theyareverygoodpeople.SosinceIcometothisclass,Imeetallthesepeopleandaresogoodforme...they’remyfriends.WhenIcometoschool,I’mhappy.[Ahmed]
Atthisthirdsite,whatwesawwasateacherwhosepracticewasstronglyanchoredinherbeliefaboutteachingasarelationalactivity.Shebalancedwhatsheknewherstudentsneededtolearn(exchangeofculturalcapital),andthewaystheycouldlearn,withtheneedsofthesyllabus.Ann’sstronggroundinginherparticularpractice,herconfidenceandaccumulatedculturalcapitalallowedhertoworkoutsideofthedoxaofthefield;sheallowedthelearnersacentralpositionanddidnotfeelinhibitedbythemorenarrowly-defined,officialcurriculum.
Inafieldwithsomanyvariablestodealwith,andwhereeventsunfoldinwaysthatareunpredictable,itisnotsurprisingthatinexperiencedteachersmayfeelalackofcontrolovertheirteachingpractice.However,startingfromherknowledgeandworkwiththelearners,Ann’spracticewasclearlyaresultoftherelationshipbetweenthevariouscapitalsandhabitusinthefield.Shewasunwillingtocompromiseandwasclearaboutwhenandwhereshecouldandshouldbeflexibleandresponsivetoherlearners.Thisinturnprovidedpossibilitiesofatransformativelearningenvironment,Kumaravadivelu’sthirdparameter,forherandherstudents.
Conclusion
Itisaxiomatictosaythattheteachingfieldiscomplexandthatteachers’strugglesaremany.Thispaperhasraisedquestionsandillustratedwaysinwhichteachersshapeandreshapepracticeinthefield.Theadultlanguage,literacyandnumeracyclassroomisacomplexfield.Thedoxaofthefieldsuggestthatlearners’goalsarenarrowlydefinedtomeetemployabilitycriteria,butmanyteachersrecognisethevariousotherpressinglearningandsocialneedsthat
34 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
learnerspresent.Inrespondingtothelearners’needs,theteacherscanriskbeingde-legitimatedwithintheirinstitutions.
Wehaveshownthatteachersareinvolvedinadynamicprocessofinteractionwitharangeofinter-relatedelements.Teachers’learningiscontingentoncertainconditions—bothmaterialandnotmaterial.Wecontendthatsometeachers’habitusarebetterattunedtotherelationsinthefieldandhencearemoreabletoacculturatetonewcircumstances.Thisleadsustothenotionsofresilienceandrobustness.Whilethesehavenotbeenexploredindepthhere,theyareclearlyattributesthathelpteacherstomaintainandsustaintheirpractice,particularlyinchallengingcontexts.
Whenateacher’shabitusishighlyattunedtothefield,theyareasPriya,Peter,JeanandAnndemonstrate,abletorespondcontingentlytostudentirruptions.Theseirruptionscanshiftorevolveintonewdispositions,repositioningtheagentsinthefield.Thisinevitablyshiftspractices.Wehaveexaminedmomentsofopportunityofferedthroughthestudents’agencyandteachers’contingency.Thepracticesthatemergearecontingentonaparticularresponseataparticularpointintime.
Wealsosawteachersinthisstudyengagedinstrugglestocontinuallydemocratisethefield.InBourdieu’sterms,thisisanattempttoredistributeresourcesandtoaddressthesymbolicviolenceunderlyingallteachingpractice.Theteachersdrewnotonlyontheirownprofessionalresources(capital)tosupportthelearners,butasPriyaexplained,theirsocialandlinguisticcapitalandotherculturalresourcestoconnectwithandgivebenefittothelearners.Annactivelydrewouttheresourcesthatthelearnersbroughtwiththemandfacilitatedtheredistributionoftheseresourcesintheclassroom.
Howisteachers’learningvaluedand/orlegitimated?Thereisnoformallegitimationofcontinuedteacherlearningthroughpracticeintheadultlanguage,literacyandnumeracyfield.Currently,there
Teaching practice in the making 35
arenoformalrequirementsforteachersinthisfieldtoparticipateincontinuingprofessionallearning.Teacherscanonlyvaluethisthroughtheirowninternallegitimationandthroughtheirinteractionswiththeirpeers.Thisstudysuggeststhatmuchofthisiscontainedintheirteachingandlearningrelationshipswithstudents.Thismeansthatthevaluehastoberecreatedorreactivatedeachtimeanewgroupoflearnersarrives.Thereisastruggleandatensionbetweentheofficialnotionsofpracticeandtheirinvocationofpracticethroughrelationshipofparticularity,practicalityandpossibility.Itisalsoimportanttobemindfulthatthisstudyfocusedonexpertteacherswhohadthebenefitofamorevibrantandconnectedfieldinitsearlierdays.Whatofthegenerationofteachersenteringthefieldnow,andinthefuture?
Inthispaper,wewereabletoexaminewhat‘expert’teachersmightbecapableof,intermsofnegotiatingthiscomplexterrain.Beinginvolvedinthefieldasteachereducators,wehavevestedintereststoseethecontinuingemergenceofthese‘expert’teachers.We,too,haveaninterestininfluencingthefield.
Acknowledgements
WeacknowledgethefundingsupportfromtheCommonwealthofAustraliawhofundedtheresearchprojectonwhichthispaperisbasedthroughtheAdultLiteracyNationalProjectscheme.
Weexpressourappreciationanddeepadmirationfortheteachersandlearnerswhoparticipatedinourresearchandtheirteachingandlearningpractices.
References
AustralianCouncilforAdultLiteracy(ACAL)(2008).Language, literacy and numeracy program services: ACAL’s response to the LLNP discussion paper,viewed12September,2010athttp://www.acal.edu.au/
36 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
Baynham,M.(2006).‘Agencyandcontingencyinthelanguagelearningofrefugeesandasylumseekers’,Linguistics and Education,17(1):24–39.
Black,S.(1992),Ensuring quality adult basic education provision: The report of the ILY project on the registration of adult basic education providers,Canberra:CommonwealthofAustralia.
Black,S.(2010).‘Workingtheinterstices:Adultbasiceducationteachersrespondtotheauditculture’,Literacy and Numeracy Studies,18(2):6–25.
Black,S.&Yasukawa,K.(2010).‘Timefornationalrenewal:Australianadultliteracyandnumeracyas“foundationskills”’,Literacy and Numeracy Studies,18(2):43–57.
Bourdieu,P.(1998).Practical reason,London:PolityPress.Bourdieu,P.(1992).‘Thinkingaboutlimits’,Theory, Culture and Society,
9:37–49.Bourdieu,P.&Eagleton,T.(1992).Doxaandcommonlife,New Left Review,
199:111–121.Burns,A.&deSilvaJoyce,H.(2007).‘Challengingrequirements:How
teachersnavigatetomakechangeswithinrequiredcurricula’,inBurns,A&DeSilvaJoyce,H.(eds),TESOL Language Curriculum Development Series,Virginia:TESOL:1–15.
Castleton,G.,Sanguinetti,J.&Falk,I.(2001).‘Wanted:AnewnationaladultliteracypolicyforAustralia’,Literacy and Numeracy Studies,11(1):3–20.
Chodkiewicz,A.,Widin,J.&Yasukawa,K.(2010).‘Makingconnectionstore-engageyoungpeopleinlearning:Dimensionsofpractice’,Literacy and Numeracy Studies,18(1):35–51.
Cross,R.(2010).‘Languageteachingassocioculturalactivity:Rethinkinglanguageteacherpractice’,The Modern Language Journal,94(3):434–452.
FoundationSkillsWorkingGroupSecretariat(2011).National foundation skills for adults—consultation paper,Canberra:DepartmentofEducation,EmploymentandWorkplaceRelations.
Groundwater-Smith,S.&Mockler,N.(2009),Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap,Dordrecht:Springer.
Hoesktra,A.,Korthagen,F.,Brekelmans,M.,Beijaard,D.&Imants,J.(2009).‘Experiencedteachers’informalworkplacelearningandperceptionsofworkplaceconditions’,Journal of Workplace Learning,21(4):276–298.
Teaching practice in the making 37
Holland,D.&Bartlett,L.(2002).‘Theorizingthespaceofliteracypractices’,Ways of Knowing Journal,2(1):10–22.
Kumaravadivelu,B.2003.Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching,NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress.
McGuirk,J.(2001).Adult literacy and numeracy practices 2001: A national snapshot,Canberra:CommonwealthofAustralia.
McMorrow,M.(2007).‘Teachereducationinthepostmethodsera’,ELT Journal,61(4):375–377.
Morton,T.,McGuire,T.&Baynham,M.(2006).A literature review on teacher education in adult literacy, numeracy and ESOL,London:NationalResearchandDevelopmentCentreforAdultLiteracyandNumeracy.
Noddings,N.(2003).‘IsTeachingaPractice?’,Journal of Philosophy of Education,37(2):245–251.
NSWAdultLiteracyandNumeracyCouncil(2009).People matter: Adult literacy and numeracy in NSW: 1978–2008,Sydney:NSWAdultLiteracyandNumeracyCouncil.
ProductivityCommission(2011).Vocational education and training workforce—Research report,Melbourne:ProductivityCommission.
Scheeres,H.,Gonczi,A.,Hager,P.&Morley-Warner,T.(1993).The adult basic education profession and competence: Promoting best practice,Canberra:CommonwealthofAustralia.
Tsui,A.B.M.(2009).‘Distinctivequalitiesofexpertteachers’,Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,15(4):421–439.
Tusting,K.(2009).‘“Iamnotagoodteacher;Idon’tdoalltheirpaperwork”:TeacherresistancetoaccountabilitydemandsintheEnglishSkillsforLifeStrategy’,Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 17(3):6–26.
Wheelahan,L.&Moodie,G.(2010),The quality of teaching in VET: Final report and recommendations,Melbourne:LHMartinInstituteforHigherEducationLeadershipandManagement.
Widin,J.,Yasukawa,K.&Chodkiewicz,A.(2008).Making connections: Adult literacy and numeracy practices,Canberra:CommonwealthofAustralia.
Yasukawa,K.(2008).‘Astorybookforbeginningteachersinadultlanguage,literacyandnumeracy’,inAthanasou,J.(ed.),Adult education and training,Terrigal,NSW:DavidBarlowPublishing:159–172.
38 Jacquie Widin, Keiko Yasukawa and Andrew Chodkiewicz
About the authors
Dr Jacquie Widin is a senior lecturer in theory and practice of TESOL at the University of Technology, Sydney. Her research includes language and literacy teacher education with a focus on teaching practice and critical analyses of the internationalisation of education.
Keiko Yasukawa is a lecturer in adult education, and adult literacy and numeracy at the University of Technology, Sydney. Her research includes adult education teacher development and adult teaching practices, and theories and practices of critical mathematics.
Andrew Chodkiewicz is a senior researcher in the Languages Program, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of Technology, Sydney, with an interest in community-based research related to literacy practices, community languages, cultural diversity and human rights education.
Contact details
Language Study Group, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway 2007, NSW AustraliaTel: (02) 9514 3477 Fax: (02) 9514 3933Email: [email protected]