Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

43
1 Teaching in a Tea House Alexandria Knight (Esther Grassian, UCLA College Library) Buk Binder (Marsha Schnirring, Occidental College)

description

Reprise in Second Life of 2007 LOEX Conference Presentation on results of Fall 2006 LILi information literacy survey of California libraries.

Transcript of Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

Page 1: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

1

Teaching in a Tea House

Alexandria Knight (Esther Grassian, UCLA College Library)

Buk Binder (Marsha Schnirring, Occidental College)

Page 2: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

2

LOEX 2007 Conference Session Reprise… With permission: Brad Sietz, LOEX

Director Original Presenters:

Esther Grassian, UCLA Catherine Haras, California State

University, Los Angeles Billy Pashaie, East L.A. College (now at

Cypress College)

Page 3: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

3

Surprising LILi Data re Teaching!

…in a Tea House (USC)

Page 4: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

4

They’re also teaching… …in Spanish, Chinese, Hindi &

American Sign Language (Alameda County Library)

Archiving VOIP (Voice Over IP) Library Sessions (National University)

Page 5: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

5

LILi? What? Why? How? Lessons Learned Further Research

Page 6: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

6

LILi: Lifelong Information Literacy Informal Group of Librarians Spectrum of California Libraries Investigating IL Definitions, Standards &

Instruction GOAL: Suggestions re Sequenced, Lifelong

ILI Curriculum

http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/college/lili/index.htm

Page 7: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

7

Why? Lit Review Hypothesis: ILI efforts across various

types of libraries are not sequentially coordinated.

Page 8: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

8

More… Interesting surprises re AASL and

ACRL’s Blueprint for Collaboration

http://tinyurl.com/38d45t

IFLA and UNESCO don’t mention sequential ILI

Page 9: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

9

Even more… Pipeline & Lifelong ILI Underdeveloped Cross-Institutional Collaboration Limited

or Non-Existent Obstacles

Budget Time Personnel

Page 10: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

10

California-Specific Problems Fewest FTE Library Media Teachers

(LMTs) in Nation No State IL Mandate

Page 11: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

11

How? LILi Methodology: Survey Instrument

Broad IL Definition Goal re ILI in California: To ID…

current practice gaps overlaps

Page 12: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

12

Issues IL Offered, but Not Labeled as IL Instruction Differs Even Within

Institutions

Page 13: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

13

Questions… # of Surveys to Use No Funding Soliciting Broad Cross-Section of

Responses Consciousness-Raising Decision: 1 Zoomerang Survey

Page 14: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

14

No Precedent

First Grassroots IL Survey Across All Types of Libraries

Page 15: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

15

Data Collection Two Question Reviews by Expert Spring 2006 Pilot Fall 2006 Final Survey Mounted

Page 16: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

16

More Issues… Difficult to Determine Total # of

California Libraries Missing Numbers…

Academic Library Branches Public Library Departments Private School Libraries or Library Media

Centers

Page 17: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

17

Numbers Available Public Libraries: 1,153 Special Libraries: 1,017 Academic Libraries: 346 Public School Libraries or Library Media

Centers: 6,340 TOTAL: 8,856

Page 18: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

18

Survey Responses 300 Total Responses Geographically Distributed Across

California 247 Usable Responses

Page 19: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

19

Issues Results Cannot be Generalized Interesting Data Tell Anecdotal Story Reflects Range of Current IL Practice in

California Survey Analysis=Significance &

Broadest Interest

Page 20: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

20

Sample {n=247}

Academic = 32% Public = 16% School = 48% Special = 1% Other = 5% 98% have an operating Library or

Library Media Center

Page 21: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

21

Serving a range of populations Up to 500 = 11% 501-5000 = 48% 5,001-20,000 = 16% 20,001-50,000 = 12% Over 50,000 = 11%

Page 22: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

22

4 Preliminary Findings Professional Instruction using IL

standards Teaching infrequently assessed and not

mandatory Articulation beyond the institution is rare Achievements and obstacles common

across libraries

Page 23: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

23

1. Professional instruction using IL standards

The number of libraries…

Offering instruction 76%

With a definition of IL 69%

Using professionally developed standards 71%

Using Librarians to teach (MLS/MLIS) 74%

For school or course-related assignments•44% High school•36% Undergraduates

95%

Page 24: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

24

Type of instruction

•Point of use or 1-on-1 90%

•Informational web pages 71%

•Group instruction 67%•Instructional materials (bibliographies, finding aids)

62%

•Interactive tutorials 21%•For ILI, few use blogs (7%), RSS feeds (4%), podcasts (2%) or wikis (2%)

Page 25: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

25

2. Teaching not assessed frequently and not mandatory

Number of libraries…

Without formal assessment practices

43%

With mandatory ILI 18%

Page 26: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

26

We are teaching the same topics

Overlapping instruction

Library catalog 95%

Locating materials 89%

How the web works 67%

Basic computer functions 51%

Surprises: •36% teach evaluation of periodical articles•18% teach blogs and wikis

Page 27: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

27

3. Articulation Beyond the Institution is Rare

Only 7 of 247 libraries reported contact or collaboration with a sequencing institution

Only 48% include “ability to engage in lifelong learning” in their IL definition

Page 28: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

28

4. Achievements & Obstacles Common Across Libraries

Highly valued achievements {N=195} empowered users establishing course-integrated or

sequenced instruction collaboration with faculty ILI required or reaches most of their

users community support for ILI

Page 29: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

29

4. Achievements & Obstacles Common Across Libraries

Challenges to ILI {N=195} faculty resistance staffing time funding poor outreach no mandate a very small number noted lack of IL or poor

quality IL at preceding (feeder) institution as impediment to instruction

Page 30: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

30

Data for Academic Institutions

Page 31: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

31

27 Community Colleges

Reach the following:

Middle school students 7%

High school students 30%

High school faculty 15%

Parents of college students 7%

General public adults 41%

General public teens 30%

Senior citizens 30%

Page 32: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

32

27 Community Colleges

All respondents assess student learning 81% formally assess 100% informally assess 70% use “direct” assessment 30% use “indirect”

Page 33: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

33

27 Community Colleges Shasta College

Teaches distinguishing among & using different types of images

Santa Rosa Junior College Teaches problem-solving & decision-

making

Page 34: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

34

17 California State Universities (CSU)

Reach the following:

Elementary school students 18%

Middle school students 29%

High school students 65%

Undergraduate/Graduates 100%

College faculty 82%

General public 35%

Senior Citizens 29%

Page 35: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

35

17 California State Universities

All respondents assess student learning

100% informally assess89% formally assess

Page 36: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

36

21 Private Colleges & Universities Use ACRL Standards + Big 6 (U of

Redlands) Teach not to procrastinate (Loyola

Marymount) Teach how to set up alerts, use

clipboard, get database help (Samuel Merritt College)

Page 37: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

37

12 University of California Libraries UC Irvine

Teaches elementary school, junior high & high school students & faculty

Reaches every freshperson (4000/year) UC Santa Barbara

Does IL in social settings Uses cellphones

Page 38: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

38

Data For Other Types of Libraries

Page 39: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

39

40 Public Libraries

Santa Clara County >100,000 users 80 full-time librarians Use iPods & publicize widely Reach 101-205/year

Page 40: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

40

More public libraries… Outreach to schools

“Visit schools doing all day sessions for classes” (Palos Verdes District, Peninsula Center Library)

Berkeley Public Library No classes 81-100% of users have serious or profound

IL needs

Page 41: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

41

3 Special Libraries

Boeing Library >100,000 users 47 full-time & 3 part-time librarians Teach “how to avoid copyright

problems” Publicity: Corporate Intranet &

Business Partner Staff Meetings

Page 42: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

42

Lessons Learned

1. Need 4 Different Surveys2. Focus on Smaller Geographic

Area as Model3. Ask Directly re Sequential IL4. Funding Needed for Professional

Survey

Page 43: Teaching In A Tea House For Sl 9 13 07 Edited

43

Further Research Is Needed

Goal: An information literate populace