Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant...

98
Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University

Transcript of Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant...

Page 1: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and

Assessment

Diane Ebert-MayDepartment of Plant Biology

Michigan State University

Page 2: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

QuickTime™ and aGraphics decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Page 3: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

The trouble with our times is that the future is not

what it used to be.

-Paul Valery, The Art of Poetry

Page 4: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Questions for you...• What do you expect to gain from this

workshop?

• What are your major teaching challenges?

• What challenges do your students face in learning?

• How did you learn science?

• How do your students learn science?

Page 5: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Engage

Page 6: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 1

• Active learning strategies enable students to learn science better than passive lectures.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 7: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 2

• Students learn science best by “doing” science.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly disagree

Page 8: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 3

• How important is it to use multiple kinds of assessments to determine students’ learning?

Please respond on a scale of 0-100% in increments of 10:

Page 9: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 4

• The proportion of assessments I use in my course that demonstrate students’ critical thinking abilities is....

Please respond on a scale of 0-100% in increments of 10:

Page 10: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 5

• In my department, excellence in teaching is rewarded at a level comparable to excellence in research.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 11: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Students are the tie that binds us...

Page 12: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 1

• Active learning strategies enable students to learn science better than passive lectures.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 13: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 14: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Class Meeting

Page 15: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Class Meeting

Page 16: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Class Meeting

Page 17: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 18: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 2

• Students learn science best by “doing” science.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly disagree

Page 19: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Lila Smith 1975; in Smith el al. 2005

Page 20: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 21: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Teacher- to Learner-Centered Classroom

• How does scientific teaching promote this transition?

Page 22: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 23: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Lila Smith 1975; in Smith el al. 2005

Page 24: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 3

• How important is it to use multiple kinds of assessments to determine student learning?

Please respond on a scale of 0-100 in increments of 10:

Page 25: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 4

• The proportion of assessments I use in my course that demonstrate students’ critical thinking abilities is....

Please respond on a scale of 0-100 (%) in increments of 10:

Page 26: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

• Connections among concepts

• Organization of concepts

• Visual representations

• Model-based reasoning

• Test models

• Solve problems

What is critical thinking?

Page 27: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Question 5

• In my department, excellence in teaching is rewarded at a level comparable to excellence in research.

Please respond on a scale of 1-5: 1=strongly agree; 2=agree; 3=neutral; 4= disagree; 5=strongly

disagree

Page 28: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Explore

Page 29: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

What’s up with Termites?

•1. On a sheet of paper, draw two circles near each other on the center of the page.

•2. Release termites onto paper.•3. Keep creatures safe. I shall collect them in their original habitat.

•4. What do you observe about termite behavior?

•5. Develop a question your group could explore if you had more time.

•(15 minutes - select a timekeeper)

Page 30: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Learning Objective

•Develop one possible learning objective for this ‘inquiry’.

•What do you want students to know and be able to do?

•What evidence is acceptable?

Page 31: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Give your students a roadmap to learning….

• Benefits and costs?

Page 32: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Explore: Out of Thin Air

Page 33: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

What is going on?• Brainstorm: talk to your neighbor and

diagnose the situation from both the teacher’s and learner’s perspective.

• What is the learning challenge?

Page 34: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

• Photosynthesis as Energy

• Biomass from Soil

• Energy as Biomass

• All Green

• Plant Altruism

• Thin Air

• Respiration as ‘breathing’

Misconceptions about Photosynthesis, Respiration, and the Carbon Cycle

Page 35: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

How and when do you identify student learning difficulties?

Pre-test (e.g., specific questions - identify misconceptions)

Engagement activity - brain teaser, discussion starter, ‘need to know’ questions

Surveys or polls (clickers?)

Others?

Page 36: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Problem in Class

•Experimental setup:•Weighed out 3 batches of radish seeds •each weighing 1.5 g.

•Experimental treatments:•1. Seeds placed on DRY paper towels in LIGHT•2. Seeds placed on WET paper towels in LIGHT•3. Seeds placed on WET paper towels in DARK

Page 37: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Problem (cont)

• After 1 week, all plant material was dried in an oven overnight (no water left) and plant biomass was measured in grams. •Predict the biomass of the plant material in the various treatments.

Light, no water Light, water Dark, water

Page 38: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Results Mass of Radish Seeds/Seedlings

1.46 g 1.63 g 1.20 g

Write an explanation about the results.

Explain the results.Write individually on carbonless

paper.

Page 39: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Assessment on Final Exam

Hypothetical scenario: Grandma Johnson had very sentimental feelings toward Johnson Canyon, Utah, where she and her late husband had honeymooned long ago. Her feelings toward this spot were such that upon her death she requested to be buried under a creosote bush overlooking the canyon. Trace the path of a carbon atom from Grandma Johnson’s remains to where it could become part of a coyote. NOTE: the coyote will not dig up Grandma Johnson and consume any of her remains.

Page 40: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Assessment on FinalDeep within a remote forest of Guatemala, the remains of a spider monkey were buried under an enormous mahogany tree. Although rare, jaguars (big cats - carnivores) were spotted in this forest by local farmers. Explain how a carbon atom in carbohydrates contained within the muscle cells of the spider monkey could become part of a cell within the stomach lining of a jaguar. Note: the jaguar does not dig up the monkey and eat the remains!

Page 41: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Make a clearly labeled box model of the system. Use the template on the Answer Sheet. You will not need all of the boxes. In the model, clearly label the processes (next to arrows), organisms or places, and forms (carbon pools) the carbon atom must go through to cycle within the ecosystem. Use the organisms/places and pools from the lists below.

To do so...

Place or Organism [not listed in a specific order]

Carbon Pools [form]

AtmosphereJaguar (carnivore)Mahogany tree (producer)Bacteria (decomposer)Spider Monkey (herbivore)Tapir (similar to a pig) (herbivore)

CO2 gasCarbohydrate

Page 42: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

ProcessPool

Place

Pool

Place

Pool

Place

Process

Reminder: format for a box model:

Page 43: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 44: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Circles identify key portions of box model. Orange circles identify difficult portions for students.

Page 45: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 46: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 47: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

How People LearnBransford et al 1999,

2004

Page 48: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Explain

Page 49: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Frustrated Student

Reflecting on this case, consider the following:

1. What questions and issues does this case raise?2. As an instructor, what would you do in this situation? 3. What are the learning objectives for each class? 4. What are the students’ expections for course?5. How do the active, in-class problems in groups motivate students to learn, or not?6. Have you faced a similar challenge? If so, what did you learn from it?

Within groups: think-pair-share

Page 50: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Cooperative Learning

Eric Mazur - Harvard (Dept of Physics) - Peer Instruction

Karl Smith - University of Minnesota (Civil Engineering Dept) Cooperative/ Collaborative Learning

Page 51: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Regrouping

What are ways of putting students into cooperative

groups?

Individual accountability and group responsibility with common goal.....

Page 52: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Frustrated Student

Reflecting on this case, consider the following:

1. What questions and issues does this case raise?2. As an instructor, what would you do in this situation? 3. What are the learning objectives for each class? 4. What are the students’ expections for course?5. How do the active, in-class problems in groups motivate students to learn, or not?6. Have you faced a similar challenge? If so, what did you learn from it?

Within groups: think-pair-share

Page 53: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

What is assessment? Data collection with the purpose of

answering questions about…students’ understanding

students’ attitudes

students’ skills

instructional design and implementation

curricular reform (at multiple grain sizes)• Informing BOTH instructors and

students about learning.

Page 54: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Learning Outcome

• Statement that indicates level of expectation of performance.

• What evidence will indicate whether students have achieved the learning objective?

• (actions, behaviors that can be assessed)

Page 55: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

What level of learning do we ask of our students?

Bloom (1956) Cognitive Domain of Educational Objectives

6 categories - KnowledgeComprehensionApplicationAnalysisSynthesisEvaluation

Page 56: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Characterize the Level of Expectation

• Return to the ‘better’ bubble learning objective....

• ...assign a Bloom level to each.

Page 57: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Jigsaw

Count off -- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All 1s work on same paper ....2s, 3s, 4s, 5s

Later: Return to new groups and share what you found in each of the papers.

Report out

Page 58: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Paper Assignments

Group 1: Climate change....

Group 2: Novel assessments...

Group 3: Unraveling complexity...

Group 4: Unleashing problem solvers...

Group 5: Active homework...

Page 59: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Jigsaw

•Tomorrow, return to your home group....and discuss. You should be able to answer the following:

•1. What are the student learning goals?

•2. What is the Bloom-level of each goal?

•3. Describe the type of assessment used in the unit.

•4. Do the assessments align with the goals?

•5. What are the active learning strategies?

Page 60: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Reflections on Today

Muddiest Point: 1. What are your questions?2. What still seems “clear as mud?”3. What do you wish we were doing?

Angelo and Cross (1993)

Page 61: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Your Questions

• Visit class in Biological Sciences?

• Group work - high and low students?

• Students’ responses to innovation?

• Cover vs. Uncover - plus time?

• Student evaluations?

• Academic integrity?

Page 62: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Your Wishes

• Location-specific methods for Kuwait U.

• Decreasing teaching loads to improve quality teaching?

• Comprehension and communication

• How to assess student understanding of lecture?

• More physics examples!

Page 63: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Your Muddiest Points

• Nothing is muddy

• Interactive logistics

Page 64: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Engage• Use Bloom’s taxonomy to

categorize the first 5 questions you brought from an assessment from your course.

• Each question = one postit.

• Level 1 - blue• Level 2 - yellow• Level 3 - pink• Level 4 - green• Level 5 - purple

Page 65: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Department of Plant Biology

% T

ota

l Q

s

Course Level*N items

Page 66: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Jigsaw Homework

•Tomorrow, return to your home group....and discuss. You should be able to answer the following:

•1. What are the student learning goals?

•2. What is the Bloom-level of each goal?

•3. Describe the type of assessment used in the unit.

•4. Do the assessments align with the goals?

•5. What are the active learning strategies?

Page 67: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Groups 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s

•Group roles:

•Time keeper

•Reporter

•Recorder

•Encourager/facilitator

Page 68: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Groups 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s

• Consider one learning challenge of Kuwait University Students and adapt the Pathways to Scientific Teaching ideas to one unit of instruction.

• Summaries the ideas on large flip chart paper.

• Reporter - gives synopsis to large group.

Page 69: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Individual Activity

•Select two types of assessments that you brought from your course.

1.Compare two types of assessments.

2.Chose one assessment and develop a learning objective for it.

Page 70: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

How do you go about developing a unit for your course?

How would you start?What would you do?

Instructional Design

Page 71: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Learning ObjectiveIdentify desired results

Learning OutcomeDetermine acceptable evidence

AssessmentsData collected & Feedback given

Instructional Design & ActivitiesPlanned learning experiences and instruction

Backward Design

Adapted from Wiggins and McTighe 1998, 2005

Page 72: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Backward Design

Page 73: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Hierarchy

has

Structure

has

Concept Maps

Visual DiagramsOr Models

are represent

Knowledge or Understanding

Concepts

display

connectedwith

Linking Words

Used for

Assessment Organization

Reflection &Learning

promotes

Context

is constructedwith

NewInformation

PriorKnowledge

Page 74: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

1. Select a concept that is critical for your students to understand.

2. Identify 4 or 5 subconcepts that are important to understanding that concept

e.g., DNA - Gene- Chromosome - Protein

For a course you teach .....

3. Add linking lines to make connections between two concepts4. Add linking words that describe the relationship between two concepts

Page 75: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

www.ctools.msu.edu

Page 76: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Student’s Concept Map

Page 77: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Rubrics

Page 78: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Learning Objective

Students will be able to demonstrate understanding of evolution and natural selection by developing and testing models and solving problems.

Page 79: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

•Changes in a population occur through a gradual change in individual members of a population.

•New traits in species are developed in response to need.

•All members of a population are genetically equivalent, variation and fitness are not considered.

•Traits acquired during an individual’s lifetime will be inherited by offspring.

Misconceptions: Natural Selection

Page 80: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Pre-test: extended response. Explain the changes that occurred in the tree and animal. Use your current understanding of evolution by natural selection.

(AAAS 1999)

Page 81: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

How do we develop rubrics?

Describe the objective for the activity, problem, task...Develop criteria and performance standards for the assessmentDifferentiate levels of responses based on clearly described criteriaRate (assign value) the categories

Page 82: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Student Responses

Misconceptions Correct

Change in the individual Change in the population

Need to Change/ Must Change/ Choice

Change due to genes

All members of a population are equally fit

Individuals within a population have varying

fitness levels

Traits acquired during a lifetime are passed on

Genetic traits help the individual to survive and

reproduce

Page 83: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Level of Achievement General Approach ComprehensionExemplary(5 pts)

• Addresses thequestion.• States a relevant,justifiable answer.• Presents arguments ina logical order.• Uses acceptable styleand grammar (noerrors).

• Demonstrates an accurate andcomplete understanding of thequestion.• Backs conclusions with dataand warrants.• Uses 2 or more ideas,examples and/or arguments thatsupport the answer.

Adequate(3 pts)

• Does not address thequestion explicitly,although does sotangentially.• States a relevant andjustifiable answer.• Presents arguments ina logical order.• Uses acceptable styleand grammar (oneerror).

• Demonstrates accurate but onlyadequate understanding ofquestion because does not backconclusions with warrants anddata.• Uses only one idea to supportthe answer.• Less thorough than above.

Needs Improvement(1 pt)

• Does not address thequestion.• States no relevantanswers• indicatesmisconceptions.• Is not clearly orlogically organized.• Fails to use acceptablestyle and grammar (twoor more errors).

• Does not demonstrate accurateunderstanding of the question.• Does not provide evidence tosupport their answer to thequestion.

No Answer (0 pts)

Scoring Rubric for Quizzes and Homework

Ebert-May http://www.flaguide.org/cat/rubrics/rubrics1.php

Page 84: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Advantages of Scoring Rubrics

Improve the reliability of scoring written assignments and oral presentationsConvey goals and performance expectations of students in an unambiguous wayConvey “grading standards” or “point values” and relate them to performance goalsEngage students in critical evaluation of their own performance Save time but spend it well

Page 85: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 86: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 87: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 88: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 89: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.
Page 90: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

•http://www.msu.edu/course/isb/202/ebertmay/homepage/homework.html#hw9

Avida-ED

Page 91: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

How am I going to grade all this stuff??

Page 92: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Assessment GradientHigh

Ease of

Assessment

Low

Multiple Choice, T/F

Diagrams, Concept maps, Quantitative

response

Short answer

Essay, Research papers/ reports

Oral Interview

Low

Potential for

Assessment of Learning

High

Theoretical Framework• Ausubel 1968; meaningful learning• Novak 1998; visual representations• King and Kitchner 1994; reflective judgment• National Research Council 1999; theoretical frameworks for assessment

Page 93: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

• Subsample= You don’t need to grade everything!!

• Classroom Assessment Techniques (Angelo & Cross 1993); Muddiest Point, Minute papers etc..

• Pyramid Exams- Individual 75% + Group 25%

• Diagnostic Questions & Clickers

• Rubrics

Assessment and Feedback Approaches

Page 94: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Action PlanWhat resources from this workshop will be most helpful to you in teaching?

Reflect on your lectures. What topics are challenging to teach?

List two colleagues who would help you brainstorm active learning techniques to address these challenges.

What type of feedback would you value from a colleague?

Handelsman, Miller & Pfund 2007

Page 95: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Action Plan...continued

Our challenge to you, try one of the strategies that you and your colleague identify, next time you teach.

Page 96: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Open Mic

Page 97: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

•“...we note that successful people are the ones who take advantage of those around them to ultimately benefit students.”

•Ebert-May D, Weber R, Hodder J, Batzli J (2006)

Finally...

Page 98: Teaching for Understanding: Active Learning and Assessment Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University.

Team at MSU•Rett Weber - Plant Biology (postdoctoral researcher)•Deb Linton - Plant Biology (C. Michigan University)•Duncan Sibley - Geology•Doug Luckie - Physiology•Scott Harrison - Microbiology (graduate student)•Tammy Long - Plant Biology•Heejun Lim - Chemistry Education •Rob Pennock - Philosophy•Charles Ofria - Engineering•Rich Lenski - Microbiolgy•Janet Batzli - Plant Biology [U of Wisconsin]