TDR Plans and Scope
description
Transcript of TDR Plans and Scope
Nick WalkerMarc Ross
Akira YamamotoGDE PAC 15.11.11 Prague
TDR Plans and Scope
GDE Stated Prime Deliverables
1. An updated technical description of the ILC in sufficient detail to justify the associated VALUE estimate
2. Results from critical R&D programmes and test facilities, which either demonstrate or support the choice of key parameters in the machine design
3. One or more models for a Project Implementation Plan, including scenarios for globally distributed mass-production of high-technology components as “in-kind” contributions
4. An updated and robust VALUE estimate and construction schedule consistent with the scope of the machine and the proposed Project Implementation Plan
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Technical Volumes
15.11.2011
Reference Design Report
ILC Technical Progress Report (“interim report”)
TDR Part I:R&D
TDR Part II:BaselineReferenceReport
Technical Design Report
~250 pagesDeliverable 2
~300 pagesDeliverables 1,3 and 4
* end of 2012 – formal publication early 2013
2007 2011 2013*
AD&I
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part I: Tech. Design Phase R&D
• Comprehensive report on TDP R&D programmes– where and how we spent the money
• Similar in scope to R&D sections in interim report– more technically detailed– more conclusive
• Report R&D results should support baseline (decisions) in Part II– But scope can be broader, i.e. R&D on alternative
concepts
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part I: R&D - Outline
1. Introduction 5 pages
2. Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages
3. Beam Test Facilities 75 pages
4. Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages
5. Post-TDR R&D 20 pages
6. Conclusions 10 pages
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part I: R&D - Outline
1. Introduction 5 pages
2. Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages
3. Beam Test Facilities 75 pages
4. Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages
5. Post-TDR R&D 10 pages
6. Conclusions 10 pages
15.11.2011
2.1 Overview2.2 Gradient R&D and yield evaluation2.3 Cavity integration and S1-Global cryomodule R&D2.4 Cryomodule, cryogenics (incl. S1-Gobal)2.5 High power RF generation and distribution2.6 ML integration including quadrupole R&D2.7 Industrialisation technology and R&D
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part I: R&D - Outline
1. Introduction 5 pages
2. Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages
3. Beam Test Facilities 75 pages
4. Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages
5. Post-TDR R&D 10 pages
6. Conclusions 10 pages
15.11.2011
3.1 Overview3.2 FLASH 9mA experiment3.3 CesrTA and electron cloud R&D3.4 ATF2 Final Focus experiment
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part I: R&D - Outline
1. Introduction 5 pages
2. Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages
3. Beam Test Facilities 75 pages
4. Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages
5. Post-TDR R&D 10 pages
6. Conclusions 10 pages
15.11.2011
4.1 Overview4.2 Electron source4.3 Positron source4.4 Damping ring4.5 BDS & MDI4.6 Beam dynamics
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part I: R&D - Outline
1. Introduction 5 pages
2. Superconducting RF Technology 75 pages
3. Beam Test Facilities 75 pages
4. Accelerator Systems R&D 50 pages
5. Post-TDR R&D 20 pages
6. Conclusions 10 pages
15.11.2011
(Under discussion)- Pushing cavity performance (G, Q0) – TeV upgrade- SCRF beam test facilities
- NML@FNAL, STF@KEK, FLASH@DESY- RF power source and distribution R&D- ATF2 (KEK)- Positron source etc.
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part II: ILC Baseline Design Report
• Relatively detailed description of the updated baseline design– on which the cost estimate is based
• Similar level of detail to RDR– But different structure – see later
• Supporting R&D results to be referenced to Part I.
• Design details reference to Technical Design Documentation (TDD) in ILC-EDMS– electronic version to contain hyperlinks– see later
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part II: ILC Baseline Design Report
1. Introduction and overview 5 pages
2. General parameters and layout 15 pages
3. SCRF Main Linacs 40 pages
4. Polarised electron source 15 pages
5. Positron source 20 pages
6. Damping Rings 30 pages
7. Ring to Main Linac (RTML) 20 pages
8. Beam Delivery System & MDI 30 pages
9. CFS and global systems 30 pages
10... see later
15.11.2011
Detailed section outline available here
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
RDR vs TDR Part II
• RDR was divided into – Accelerator Systems (sources, DR, BDS etc.)
– Technical Groups (cryomodule, RF, magnets vacuum etc.)
• TDR Part II is Accelerator System orientated– Each sub-system will cover its own technical
systems– Better suited to TD Phase project structure– Acknowledge lack of RDR-like tech. groups
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part II Example Chapter
6 Damping Rings6.1 Top-level DR layout and parameters6.2 Lattice description6.3 Beam dynamics (e-cloud, FII and classical
instabilities, LET)6.4 Vacuum system design (including e-cloud
mitigation, impedance etc)6.6 Magnets and power supplies6.7 Instrumentation and feedback systems
15.11.2011
Technical systems
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Special Cases: SCRF
3 SCRF Main Linacs3.1 Main linac layout and parameters3.2 Cavity performance and production specification3.3 Cavity integration (coupler, tuners,…)3.4 Cryomodule design (including quad package)3.5 Cryogenics3.6 RF power and distribution systems
KCSDRFSRDR solution (back-up)
3.7 Low-level RF control
15.11.2011
Description of regional baseline variants
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Special Cases: CFS
9 CFS9.1 Introduction 9.2 Asian Region Siting Studies9.3 European Region Siting Studies9.4 Asian Region Civil Design9.5 Americas Region Civil Design9.6 European Region Civil Design9.7 Mechanical Design9.8 Electrical Design
15.11.2011
No Americas siting study
Civil construction design now reflects regional design differences
Common mechanical and electrical design concepts
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Part II: ILC Baseline Design Report
10. TeV Energy and Luminosity 20 pages Upgrade
– integration of planned white paper
11. Cost and Schedule 20 pages
12. Project Implementation Planning >20 pages– integration of stand-alone report (57 pages)– see presentation by E. Paterson
13. Post-TDR Engineering 20 pages– including technical risk assessment
14. Conclusions 10 pages
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Technical Editorial Board
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Hayano (KEK)
EDMS and Tech. Design Documentation
Important goal to consolidate all technical documentation in EDMS in a structured fashion
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Web-based access to ILC WBS• http://www.linearcollider.org/GDE/te
chnical-design-documentation
• Read-only access– for convenience only– Direct use of EDMS still required for
• documentation update, sign-off, release• change control
• ILC-EDMS group populating EDMS WBS– as part of on-going baseline review
process
• Mandatory documents required– parameters– system description / interfaces– treaty points– etc.
• …15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
More Publications
15.11.2011
TDR Part I:R&D
TDR Part II:BaselineReferenceReport
Technical Design Report
~250 pages
~300 pages
Executive Summary
~50 pages pages
Executive summary- lighter weight, easier to read- possibly joint summary with
Physics & Detector publications- similar to RDR
Outreach Document
~25 pages pagesOutreach document- ILC Communicator project- Aimed at broader readership
- non-scientific- Example: ILC Passport
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Coordination with Physics & Detectors
• Time scale and scope– important to publish all documents as a set– as for RDR
• Look and feel– Same templates and layout themes should be
used
• Technical consistency– Obvious– Especially important for MDI
• Possible joint documents– Joint Executive Summary– Outreach document
• Primary coordination via respective TEBs– just starting
15.11.2011
TDR Part I:R&D
TDR Part II:BaselineReferenceReport
DBD Report Physics
Executive Summary
Outreach Document
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Tentative Schedule
15.11.2011
Korea GDE meeting24.04 – Parts I & II first drafts
US LC meeting (Arlington)24.10 – final Drafts
preparation
2011 2012
16 weeks
25 weeks
Executive Summary
Companion outreach document
Very aggressive schedule!In parallel:- cost estimation- TDD for EDMS
We like a challenge
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Meeting Cycles (WebEx)
• Established schedule: every Wednesday• New four week cycle:
– AD&I meeting– SCRF Technology– AD&I meeting– Free slot
• Additional Friday slot also available
15.11.2011
Consolidated Accelerator Systems and CFS/Global meetings (now focused on TDR work)
To be used for TDR TEB and Cost Management Team meetings
Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
2011 Preparation Work• TEB kick-off meeting
– editing assignments and agreed-upon workflow• Finalise detailed outline
– headings– estimated page count– section scope– authors
• Request feedback from authors– especially for schedule– Note: many authors have more than one writing assignment
• Consolidate/adjust writing schedule• Technical preparation
– Common workspace– LaTeX template(s)– …
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague
Summary
• Preparation for TDR well underway– Now primary GDE focus (together with costing/industrialisation)
• 2+1 separate volumes– Executive Summary– Part I R&D– Part II Baseline Design & Cost
• Accompanying outreach document– broader non-scientific readership
• Preparation work remainder of this year, writing starts next year– of course earlier is better
• Coordination with Physics & Detector groups just starting• Very aggressive scope and schedule
– However we are building on the RDR and the Interim report
15.11.2011 Nick Walker - PAC, Prague