TBXXX / STFXXX CLOSE DEBRIEFING REPORTSubject

Presented by TB Chairman

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved Version: 7 December 2012

Review of completed STFs

B88(12)030r1: help Board make more informed decisions on future funding requests

Requirement: TB Chairmen to present a few slides on the outcome of the STF, at the Board that follows its conclusion

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved2

STF Close (GoTo)Meeting

When• After conclusion of the work and approval of deliverables

Who• Reference TB/WG Chairman • STF Leader• STF Manager• Technical Officer• editHelp • EC Relations Officer (EC/EFTA contracts)• CTI Officer (testing STFs)

What• Review STF work• Exchange experience, propose improvement• Prepare “STF Close Debriefing Report”

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved3

Guidelines for the STF Close Debriefing Report

4 © ETSI 2011. All rights reserved

STF / Project summary

Subject:

Objective:

Related STFs• STF XXX

• STF XXX

• STF XXX

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserveG5

STF summary - Deliverables

STF XXX deliverables (all published)

• XX XXX XXX-X Working title

• XX XXX XXX-X Working title

• XX XXX XXX-X Working title

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserveG6

STF summary - Experts

Experts STF XXX• Firstname Lastname Company (supported by Member) • Firstname Lastname Company (supported by Member) • Firstname Lastname Company (supported by Member)

Experts related STFs• Firstname Lastname Company (supported by Member) • Firstname Lastname Company (supported by Member)

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserveG7

Cost of project

Funding overview• STF XXX 000 000 EUR

• STF XXX 000 000 EUR

• STF XXX 000 000 EUR

Total cost of project 000 000 EUR• Funded by EC/EFTA 000 000 EUR XX%

Funded by ETSI 000 000 EUR XX%

Additional funded required 000 000 EUR

Total duration: from mmm-yyyy to mmm-yyyy

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved8

Quality of deliverables

All deliverables published ? Yes No • If not, please comment:

Quality of deliverables (content):• Added-value of content• Technical consistency• Precision of content

Quality of deliverables (editorial / presentation):• Respect of editing rules• Structure coherence• Clarity /readability

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved9

Achievements & unresolved issues

Key results achieved with the support of the STF

Results that could not have been achieved without the STF

Results expected when proposing the STF and that have not been achieved: reasons and corrective actions.

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved10

Impact of deliverables

Where and how the STF deliverables will be used by the industry, market impact, expected benefits

How standards will be developed and maintained, will new STF funding be required ?

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved11

Innovation aspects

Innovation aspects may be found in the subject of the STF, the techniques / methodologies applied, opening for ETSI in new domains, interest to attract new ETSI Members

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved12

Contribution to the TB work

Consultation of TB and stakeholdersSupport from stakeholdersSuggestions to improve involvement of stakeholders

ETSI/BOARD(13)91_02213

Overall assessment of the STF

Did the outcome of the STF meet expectations ?

Has the STF been an effective tool to progress the standardization work ?

Following this experience, would you recommend your TB to apply again for STF funding ?

General comments, suggestions for improvement

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved14

Effectiveness* mark with a cross your assessment for each item (from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent)

© ETSI 2011. All rights reserved15

Item 1 2 3 4 5 Comments

Achievement of objectives

Respect of time scale

Quality of deliverables

Quality of reporting

Respect of TB guidance

Respect of ETSI editing rules

Respect of ETSI admin. rules

Quality of expert’s team

Support from secretariat