Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem …
Transcript of Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem …
OECD Workshop on Incentives to Capture Climate Change and Biodiversity Benefits from Reducing Deforestation: Linkages, Synergies and Limitations
March, 2008
Targeting and implementing payments
for ecosystem services:
Opportunities for bundling biodiversity
conservation with carbon and water
services in Madagascar
Rosimeiry Portela, Ph.D.
• Conservation International work on biodiversity
conservation
• Targeting payments for multiple ecosystem service
conservation in Madagascar
• Madagascar experience with carbon projects:
Mantadia-Zahamena
• Forests, climate change and biodiversity benefits:
Challenges and recommendations
roa
d m
ap
a f
utu
re f
or
life
for
bio
div
ers
ity
an
d f
or
peo
ple
“To conserve the Earth‟s living heritage -
-
our global biodiversity –
and demonstrate
that human societies are able to live
harmoniously with nature.”Ou
r m
iss
ion
Hotspots and wilderness areas
bio
div
ers
ity a
nd
ES
*
*Turner et al., 2007
Targ
eti
ng
PE
S • PES: Potential to create new funding opportunity
• Targeting PES to maximize benefits to society: multiple services (Bundling), cost-effectiveness (opportunity cost) and efficiency (Additionality)
• Madagascar: Opportunities for „bundling‟ biodiversity, carbon and water in a cost-effective and efficient manner.
Mad
ag
ascar
•Global importance as a biodiversity
hotspot: 80% endemic fauna and 90%
flora
•Provision of additional services: Local,
national and global beneficiaries
•Deforestation and degradation: Less
than 15% of the island remains in primary
forest
bu
nd
lin
g m
ult
iple
serv
ices
• Biodiversity: Mammals, birds and amphibians
according to level of threat*
• Carbon: Global map of carbon stock**
modified***
• Water quality: Drinking water, irrigation and
mangroves***** IUCN Red List
**Olson et o al. (1983, 1985)
*** Gibbs (2006)
****HydroSHEDS dataset and population
ad
dit
ion
ality
• Probability of Deforestation: Probit
model for deforestation (1990-2000)*
using socio-economic biophyscial
variables to predict probability of
deforestation (2000-2010)
*Gorenflo, forthcoming
op
po
rtu
nit
y c
os
ts
•Agricultural production: Industrial
crops and of subsistence crops
•Ranking system: High opportunity
costs for industrial crops and low
opportunity costs for subsistence
agriculture
PROBABILITY OF
DEFORESTATION
ADDITIONALITY:
Bundled ES *
Probability of
eforestation
BIODIVERSITY:
number of
mammals, birds &
amphibians
weighted by threat
status
CARBON:
above- and
below-ground
biomass
WATER: water
quality weighted
by human
population, rice
& mangroves
HIGH
OPPORTUNITY
COSTS
TARGETED
PAYMENTS
FOR ES
BUNDLED
ES: percent
overlap of
three
services
resu
lts
• Supporting efficiencies in the use of
biodiversity finance
• Support development of PES to match
the conservation goals based on different
funding strategies
• Strategy for mitigation/adaptation
activities aimed at minimizing vulnerability
to climate changeTarg
eti
ng
PE
S
Deforestation Data: CI/IRG/USAID, 2007
• Presidential commitment to
conservation (2003)
• PAs key to success reduction in
deforestation rates:
1990-2000: 0.83% loss/year
2000-2005: 0.53% loss/year
• Carbon finance holds the
largest potential for funding
PES in Madagascar
Red
ucin
g d
efo
resta
tio
n
ma
nta
dia
•Partnership: Government, non-government and local
facilitating organizations.
•Services: Carbon emission reductions and biodiversity
existence values
•Approach: Reduced deforestation, reforestation and
livelihood activities.
•Science: Mapped the corridor based on biodiversity priority
and ES benefits
•Policy and Markets: Development of national capacity to
trade carbon and influence international policy and market
conservation carbon project
results
Conserves 450,000 hectares of rain forest
Sequesters 10 million tons of CO2 emissions
Provides livelihoods alternatives to tavy, land tenure
clarification, employment opportunities
Protects flagship species (Indri, gecko, orchids)
ma
nta
dia
CI C
arb
on
fo
rest
pro
jects
Existing EffortsUnder Development
•Forests carbon projects have potential for multiple benefits goal: Climate mitigation, biological diversity and sustainable development
•Community and conservation protected areas:
Proven effective tools that have reduced
deforestation and resulting emissions
•Inclusion of degradation: Most forests are steadily
degraded prior to being “deforested”
•Inclusion of historically low deforestation countries
where future deforestation is likely higher
Reco
mm
en
dati
on
an
d
ch
alle
ng
es
thank you
all photos © minden pictures, naturePL, CI
OECD Workshop on Incentives to Capture Climate Change and Biodiversity Benefits from Reducing Deforestation: Linkages, Synergies and Limitations
March, 2008