TANO vs Socrates
description
Transcript of TANO vs Socrates
TANO v. SOCRATESFacts:The petitioners fled a petition for certiorari and prohibitionassailing the constitutionality of:(1)Ordi nanceNo. 15-9enti tl ed:! "N O#$%N"N&' ("NN%N) T*' +*%,-'NT O. "// /%0'.%+* "N$ /O(+T'# O1T+%$' ,1'#TO ,#%N&'+" &%T2 .#O-3"N1"#2 14 1995 TO 3"N1"#2 141996 "N$ ,#O0%$%N)'7'-,T%ON+4 ,'N"/T%'+ "N$ .O# OT*'# ,1#,O+'+ T*'#'O.!() O8 ce Order No. 54 re9ui ri ng any personengaged or i ntendi ng to engage i n any busi ness4trade4 occupation4 callingor profession or ha:ing inhispossession any of the articles for ;hich a peringanddirecting to chec? or conduct necessaryinspections oncargoescontaining li:e fshandlobsterbeingshippedoutfro< ,uerto ,rincesa and4( 5 ) # e s o l u t i o n N o . 5 5 4 O r d i n a n c e N o . e n t i t l e d : ! " # ' + O / 1 T % O N , # O * % ( % T % N )T * '&"T&*% N)4 )"T*'#% N)4 ,O++'++% N)4 (12% N)4+'//% N) "N$ +*% ,-'NT O. /% 0' -"#% N' &O#"/$@'//%N) "A1"T%& O#)"N%+-+BT h e p e t i t i o n e r s c o n t e n d t h a t t h e s a i dOr d i n a n c e s d e p r i : e d t h e