Taming the dissertation/thesis beast What we wish we had known and didn’t know to ask
description
Transcript of Taming the dissertation/thesis beast What we wish we had known and didn’t know to ask
Taming the dissertation/thesis beast What we wish we had known and didn’t know to ask
Dr. Dianne Cothran, [email protected]
Dr. Mickey Schafer, [email protected]
Dial Center for Written and Oral Communication
There are 4 phases to the projectPhase One – search for a project,
write the proposalPhase Two – conduct literature
review, begin “experimental” phase
Phase Three – Freak out and Revise study
Phase Four – Write the dissertation
Note: the formality of each depends on your field!
Phase I: Write a Proposal/Prospectus
Main objective – lay out the plan for the project
Committee needs to know that: ◦You know something about what you
are doing◦You have a workable RQ◦You have a plan
And yes, they do know all this may change.
Why write a proposal?Because your college said they
want this: “… the student should make sure that the Supervisory Committee is kept abreast of research direction, progress and results, and that the members have a chance to review and make suggestions on early versions of the thesis.” (line excerpted from MS/PhD list of student responsibilities)
Proposals have 4 partsPart One – Exec Summary/Significance
◦Short (1-2 paragraph) overview of topic, why it is significant, RQ, why RQ is significant
Part Two – Lit Review◦2-5 page exploration of expert literature in
topic areaPart Three – Methodology
◦Lay out timeline, materials, cost, procedure,etc.
Part Four – Tentative Bibliography◦Demonstrate you know your stuff
Proposals vary in formalityIn some fields, the proposal is an
extremely important document – it’s a step on the way to PhD candidacy
In other fields, the proposal is a planning step – the committee wants to see it in order to help you
Some fields may not require a proposal at all – you should still write one for the purpose of planning procrastination!
Research is driven by questions.Method – is how you answer the
RQThe best way to get research
done is to formulate a question – just one question!◦You may need smaller questions
along the way◦Your RQ answers grad students’ least
favorite question: “What’s your thesis about?”
◦RQ Wh-question, may be yes/no, but that takes some serious you-know-what-body-part
Methodology is Discipline Specific.
◦Humanities◦ – lots of thinking, reading, more
thinking, and some more reading New Methods for Humanities Research --
http://www3.isrl.illinois.edu/~unsworth/lyman.htm
Digital Research Tools Kit -- http://digitalresearchtools.pbworks.com
Method: SSB◦Social and Behavioral Sciences –
IRB? Quantitative (stats driven) Qualitative (words/analysis driven) Mixed (umm, well, both!) Web Center for Social Research Methods
-- http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/ Digital Research Tools Kit --
http://digitalresearchtools.pbworks.com/
Methods: bio/phys◦Biological and Physical Sciences –
P.I.’s project Quantitative Discipline-specific research protocols Bioexplorer.net --
http://www.bioexplorer.net/Methods_and_Protocols/Resources/
Phase 2 – conduct the literature reviewThe proposal included a tentative
bibliography and lit review to support your Big Idea.
In most dissertations, the literature review is the first big thing in the dissertation ◦Is the “proving ground” where you
show that you’ve done the necessary work
◦Still functions to lead to gap motivating RQ
Control the literature (or it will control you)Use the FFSP method (find, filter,
select, prioritize)◦Find using databases (see subject
guides)◦Filter using abstracts◦Select after a quick skim◦Prioritize according to impact on
project◦Any of these steps can be done on
their own!There does come a time when
you will have to stop reading!
The lit review has two jobs.
The lit review provides a state-of-the-art overview of your area of research ◦Think in terms of concept maps◦Use subheadings! They are your
friend.◦This is NOT a function of the lit
review in publication (so check with advisor what version they want)
Lit review leads to gap motivating your research ◦This function is true for publications,
too
Phase 3: Freak out and ReviseIf you don’t do this once, your
committee gets worried that they have nothing to do!
Seriously, it’s pretty normal to get part way through and hit a big, nasty existential crisis on the meaning/value/utility/ worthiness of your project. This seems to be a natural product of Deep Thought.
Phase 4: Write the PaperLook at models in your
department – get inspiration and direction from what others have doneDoing something that isn’t well
represented by former graduate students? Look at published stuff.
Check with mentor/chair for what they want you to produce – dissertation, publication, or both.
More on writing:Start writing with what you
know/are most comfortable withYou will need to pre-write!
Make outlines and concept maps, paint a blackboard on your bedroom wall, use giant sticky pads, draw cartoon bubbles
Use your proposal to guide the first couple of chapters
Use Visuals EffectivelyUse the terms “figure” and
“table”Number figures/tables
consecutively throughout the entire dissertation or thesis
Give each visual a descriptive title
In the text of your dissertation/thesis, discuss each table and figure
One last slide:Make the Results section mirror
MethodsFor the Conclusion, don’t re-hash
the Results; interpret them!Write the abstract lastAbove all, BE CLEAR
◦This may seem obvious, but your committee doesn’t live inside your head with you and you will really have to explain everything
Decide what needs to be published
publication links -- vet grad studentsVet Library Guide @UFHSCL
House Calls @UFHSCL
AVMA Publications◦ JAVMA◦ AJVR
AAHA Publications◦ Trends◦ JAAHA
JVMEFVMA AdvocateACVP –
Veterinary Pathology
Professional Organizations are the first step in discovering publication opportunities – this includes peer-reviewed journals, practitioner journals, consumer publications, and profession-specific publications.
Choose your media outlet (where you publish) according to the audience you wish to reach, the message you wish to convey, and the publication whose mission matches the audience and message.
AND DID WE SAY. . . .BACK UP YOUR WORK!!BACK UP YOUR WORK!!BACK UP YOUR WORK!!BACK UP YOUR WORK!!BACK UP YOUR WORK!!
Tips for Taming the BeastBe flexibleCommunicate with major
professor/ committeeHave a plan for workKnow the rulesExpect things to go wrongBack up your workA collection of links for you at:
http://web.clas.ufl.edu/users/msscha/diss_links.html
In summary. . .Have a plan/schedule for writingExpect delays/obstacles/disastersField test your work as you go
along with people other than your committee
Remember, others have made it, and SO WILL YOU!
Want more help? Consider the UWP, Writing Workshops for Faculty/Grads
Defending your DissertationTeaching the Beast to Behave
What is a Defense?Purpose of the PhD process is to
birth a colleague – ultimately, committee needs proof that you can “think” like a member of the discipline – this means demonstrating that you know:
What makes your discipline unique;your discipline’s key ideas /
concepts / contributions the kinds of questions your
discipline asks the methodology the discipline
uses to answer questions
How to be a member of the club.can design/work within
discipline’s methodology/frame to critique within field
that you can use all of the above to innovate/practice in your field
the defense especially tests the last 2 points: that you understand your discipline well enough to critique in the framework of your discipline and hypothesize at the boundaries of what you know in a way that is recognizably discipline-specific.
Defending is not supposed to be easy.The high-stakes portion of your
defense is supposed to push you to the point you “break” – i.e., that you cannot answer a question with content-knowledge, but must “guess” (remember, in academics we call intelligent guessing “hypothesizing”).
You cannot possibly know everything.Get past the desire to be master
of all content because…Content exists as a product of
method/ approach/process. It is more important that you can
demonstrate HOW your discipline works.
What are you defending?“dissertation defense” may be a
misnomer since there can be more than one thing that needs defending…◦Proposal◦Qualifying Exams◦Dissertation
AND different defenses can have different outcomes attached:◦ High Stakes, Lower Stakes, No defense
All But Dissertation
Step One: Find out what you need to defend.What do you have to prepare?What do you have to produce?What do you have to defend?Note: dissertation defenses are
usually public (they have to be advertised and are open to everyone) – however, proposal and quals defenses are often private.
Step Two: Find out what options you have for defending. Is there a presentation preceding
questions? (If this is an option, take it!)
Are visuals allowed? What formats are permitted (.ppt, poster, handouts)?
How long does the process usually take? (the longer the process, the more preparation is required)
Step Three: Prepare the DefenseCreate a “map” of your proposal /
quals / dissertation – whatever it is that you need to defend. For each section, list the main ideas. For each
main idea, map out related literature (include author/s & dates, and page # in your work), related evidence (data: your stuff, too), and potential objections.
“Potential Objections” are the KEY to controlling your defense. Think objectively about your work, your claims, the way you constructed arguments (if you cannot do this or there isn’t enough time, find someone in your department who will). Generate reasonable objections. Then, prepare answers to those objections.
Prepare a Presentation (if an option)Think of this more like a conference
presentation to colleagues rather than a defense.
Incorporate the most important objections into your presentation, and (of course), provide your response.
Keep to time limits – if only given 10 minutes, then hit the main points: topic/significance,“research question”, “method”, “results”, and contribution to field. Work in objections briefly, if time (if no time, then reserve that preparation for the Q/A period). If 20 minutes, that’s enough time to get
across main points and address major objections.
Step Four: Go Forth and Defend!Get out the “map” you made and have
it handy – be familiar with it so you can find things easily – make sure it’s neat, legible, and usable.
Even for a high stakes defense, keep it cordial. This is an academic conversation…you should remain calm. Let your committee members be the ones to argue (and they just might!). It helps if you’ve had sufficient sleep and decent food in the previous 24 hours!
Typical academic questions to expect: http://www.wmich.edu/coe/fcs/cte/doctoral/oraldefense.htm
Prepare for “other” questions Be prepared to answer “soft” questions – how you
decided on this research question; what do you think is most important “take away” point; what do you think is the most damning problem; can you apply it/extend it; what should come next; if you could do it over, what would be different; what do you want to do next? (http://www.dissertationdoctor.com/advice/questions.html)
Be mentally prepared for questions that just seem weird – maybe they are “left field” questions, maybe you don’t understand the significance of the question (even though you know the answer,), maybe it’s something so specific and nitpicky that you didn’t even identify it as a possible problem.
Feel free to ask for clarification, e.g. “That’s an interesting question, but to make sure, [restate Q]– is that what you meant?”
Prepare for disagreement, digressionBe mentally prepared to disagree with a
committee member, to actually “defend” your work. Remain civil and confident.
The“A but B” strategy is an effective, academic-y way of dealing with conflict. “A” are the points of agreement, “but” is whichever logical connector works best (still, yet, however, nonetheless, despite, etc.), and “B” represents the counterpoints, e.g. “yes, while it’s true that X, Y, and Z are traditionally agreed upon, inconsistencies in the way that Y is defined weakens the likelihood that it can account for Z. Instead, if Y is broken down into U and V, then Z is a far likelier outcome”.
Committee members may digress into their own conversation – enjoy the break!
Hungry people make grouchy audiences!A Final suggestion…feed the beasts! And by
“beasts” we mean your committee members, who are not at all beastly, yet may nonetheless appreciate food & drink.◦ Fruit, cheese, bread/cracker platters can be
eaten any time during the day. ◦ Bring coffee/juice/water. No alcohol!◦ May bring home-cooked food but be smart
about choice.◦ Remember plates, forks/spoons, cups,
napkins.◦ Keep is simple and modest.◦ Before including food, check with
department.