TalentMap-Webinar-Deck-Impact of-Immediate-Manager-26mar15
Transcript of TalentMap-Webinar-Deck-Impact of-Immediate-Manager-26mar15
2Topic Agenda
Item Time
(min)
Introduction 2
The Importance of Immediate Supervisors in
Engaging Employees
5
What do the “best” immediate managers do
differently?
10
How to Improve Engagement Among
Struggling Managers
15
Q&A 5
Norm Baillie-David
SVP Engagement - TalentMap
Monica Helgoth
VP Engagement - Western Region
Agenda
3
15 years in business
7,000+ employee engagement surveys
since inception
1,000,000+ employees surveyed
500+ employee engagement surveys
annually
Only 1 Focus
TalentMap by the Numbers
4Sample Clients & Benchmark
Award Programs Technology & Engineering Not-for-Profit & Association
Financial Services
Health Sciences
Other
7
+4 +12
-1 +2
+15 +13
+6 +6
+10 +5
-2 +7
-1 +7
+12 +3
+2 +9
-14 +5
-1 -1
+4 +10
4
5
7
7
8
10
7
7
8
12
10
12
9
12
14
15
18
18
22
23
24
23
25
26
88
83
80
78
74
72
71
71
68
66
66
62
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Immediate Management
Work Environment
Teamwork
Professional Growth
Innovation
Senior Leadership
Performance Feedback
Customer Focus
Compensation
Work/Life Balance
Organizational Vision
Information and Communication
% Frequency
Unfavourable Neutral FavourableData is rounded to the nearest whole number
* Number indicates % Favourable score
+/- CLIENT
2013*
+/- TM
Benchmark
WHEN IMMEDIATE MANAGEMENT IS STRONG…..
….IT LOSES RELATIVE IMPORTANCEvs. DELTA TO BENCHMARK
8
Compensation
Work Environment
Performance Feedback
Professional Growth
Work/Life Balance
Information and Communication
Teamwork
Innovation
Customer Focus
Immediate Management
Senior Leadership
Organizational Vision
Strong
Engagement
Driver
Weak
Engagement
Driver
Worse Than
Benchmark
Better Than
Benchmark
Difference Between Functional Group and CLIENT Overall
CL
IEN
T
Ove
rall
DE
PT
1
DE
PT
2
Response Count 300 130 170
Compensation 41 -22 12
Work Environment 77 -13 9
Performance Feedback 73 -15 7
Professional Growth 70 -3 5
Work/Life Balance 58 -20 11
Information and Communication 51 -18 9
Teamwork 66 -6 -3
Innovation 74 -6 5
Client Focus 76 -6 2
Immediate Manager 66 -27 19
Management Team Leadership 65 -18 8
Organizational Vision 66 -8 0
Engagement 81 -13 11
Executive Director Leadership 62 -20 4
9STRUGGLING MANAGERS COLOUR EVERYTHING
Worse Same Better
……AND INCREASE IN IMPORTANCEs. Delta to Benchmark
10
Compensation
Work Environment
Performance Feedback
Professional GrowthWork/Life Balance
Information and Communication Teamwork
InnovationClient Focus
Immediate Manager
Management Team Leadership
Organizational Vision
Executive Director Leadership
Strong
Engagement
Driver
Weak
Engagement
Driver
Worse Than
Benchmark
Better Than
Benchmark
45%
60%
26%
Client 2013
Client 2014
Benchmark
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% Frequency
Top 5 Reasons for Leaving
(TalentExit Benchmark)
11
Lack of career/promotional
opportunities
Poor job fit
Immediate manager
leadership skills
Compensation
Lack of job challenge
….AND INCREASE TURNOVER RISK
Are you looking for or thinking of accepting a
job with another employer (% Yes)?
Personal and Emotional Relationship is the Most Influential
13
Enhancing Employee Engagement: The Role of the Immediate SupervisorDale Carnegie Training, page 3
Among employees providing positive comments:
“My manager is a great guy and cares about his employees but he could communicate more with the newer guys. Other than that he’s great!”
“I really think my manager is great. He gives me constant feedback on both positive and constructive aspects. He is trustworthy and consistent, he cares about me especially my work life balance.”
“I am extremely happy with my manager, I came from another store where my manager could care less what happened to his employees as long as he had a fat cheque coming his way at the end of the day. That being said, my current manager is the complete opposite of that he cares about his guys going home safe, over his profit at the end of the day, as well as he has sat down with me and actually discussed with me what "MY" goals & expectations are for store and he is working with & helping me attain my goals”
EXAMPLE POSITIVE COMMENTS
Comments regarding constructive feedback and recognition:
“ (Providing) more feedback with regards to what I need to improve to move up within the company would be welcomed.”
“Listen to what people have to say, constructive criticism, and acting on it. Let their staff know what a good job they are doing on a more regular basis. Be " fair " in general.
Comments regarding having more presence:
“Being more present at the front counter, involving himself with the customers and staff”.
“At times my manager is very hard to get in touch with, so more availability would be nice. I realize he is busy.”
“Saying no to extra project work when already overloaded to spend more time with the team.”
Comments regarding providing more help with career goals:
“Contructive feedback and general care and concern for everyone in the shop as people, and not employees. Support in career goals and long term objectives.”
“Direction and future career plans with store. What does he expect? How do I know he knows that I want a career path with store? What career paths can I choose from as a store employee.?
EXAMPLE COMMENTS: REQUIRE IMPROVEMENT
• Sets clear goals and expectations
• Trains and coaches staff individually
• Leads by example
• Trusts staff with tasks
• Empowers decision-making, but remains informed
• Communicates openly
• Recognizes talents (more educated)/ reinforces value to organization (less educated/front-line)
• Provides constructive feedback, informal and formal
• Encourages knowledge sharing beyond “silos”/actively discourages knowledge hoarding
• Encourages staff to offer new ideas
• Keeps staff informed and provides a window on “the big picture”
• Provides ambiguous or changes expectations often
• Expects staff to “learn by doing, i.e. on their own”
• Says one thing, does another –acts inconsistently
• Tells staff “how” to do tasks/micro-manages
• Believes s/he will always do a better job than staff
• Believes that “no news is good news” – positive feedback not required
• Only provides negative feedback
• Enforces status quo: “we’ve always done it that way”
• Feels privileged by being in the “inner circle” and shares little information
DESIRABLE vs. UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOURS
16
“Seems to care about me as a person”
The single most important differentiator…..THE CARING MANAGER
17
Engagement among those who agree/strongly agree: 90%Engagement among those who disagree/strongly disagree: 55%
Source: TalentMap Benchmark DatabaseN=101,649
Meet with staff and identify behaviours. Ensure behaviours don’t extend into abuse. Understand and Empathize.
Individual coaching – not through group work
Never in front of peers or staff.
Anticipate deflection, denial, resistance (see next slide)
Focus on addressing specific behaviours, not “personality”
Consider engaging external coach.
Ensure accountability for behaviour changes over agreed time periods. Spell out consequences for failure to change.
Consult manager and staff (separately) regularly.
“COMMON SENSE RULES”
19
A 360 Degree Feedback Program Counters Faulty Self-Perception
22
Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jackzenger/2014/04/17/the-singular-secret-for-a-leaders-success-self-awareness/
SIMULATIONS AND PEER-COACHING ARE USEFUL TOOLS
Half-Day workshop teaches HR professionals and managers:
• How to interpret and communicate survey results effectively
• How to interpret and use verbatim comments
• Exercises to diffuse the onus on the individual
• Creative lateral thinking techniques to stimulate innovative idea generation
• Idea prioritization and evaluation techniques
23
Example “Fish bowl” Simulation
Event Format Topic Date
TalentMap Webinar with Conference Boardof Canada
Live WebinarOnline
Engaging Employees through Career Growth & Development
Mar 31st
11:00 am EDT
TalentMap Webinar Live WebinarOnline
Professional Growth in Nonprofits with Limited Opportunities
April 21st
12:00pm EDT
2015 HRIA Annual Conference
Edmonton Getting Employees to Own Engagement
April 23rd
TalentMap Webinar Live WebinarOnline
Improving Employee Engagement when Senior Leadership is the Problem
April 30th
12:00pm EDT
Conference Board“Engagement 2015”
Calgary NEW Research: 10 Years On –What Do We Really Know?
May 25th
Upcoming TalentMap Learning Sessions
THANK YOU!QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION
25
Monica HelgothVP Engagement – TalentMap [email protected], x515
Norm Baillie-DavidSVP [email protected], x504