Tailings Storage Facilities Table58e3d8ff-97c1-422... · 6/14/2019 · West Wallsend, Australia,...

See explanatory notes on page 37-38 Last updated 14.06.2019 1 of 34

Tailings Storage Facilities Table

Glencore Region Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Africa

1. "Tailings Facility" Name/Identifier (Main Dam Bracketed)

West Wallsend, Australia, West Wallsend (MCPP - TSF), (North Saddle Dam)

United Collieries, Australia, United Collieries TSF, (TD 1)

United Collieries, Australia, United Collieries TSF, (TD 2)

Oaky Creek, Australia, Oaky Creek TSF, South Embankment

Oaky Creek, Australia, Oaky Creek TSF, (East Embankment)

Hail Creek, Australia, Hail Creek TSF 1, (Ring Dyke)

Goedgevonden Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, Goedgevonden, (Mine Residue Facility)

2. Location 151°35'40"E, 32°56'49"S 150°59'25"E, 32°33'37"S 150°59'34"E, 32°33'32"S 148°28'24"E, 23° 4'38"S 148°28'34"E, 23° 4'23"S 148°22'51"E, 21°29'49"S 29° 5'5"E, 26° 5'44"S

3. Ownership JV JV JV JV JV JV Subsidiary

4. Status Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Active Active

5.Date of initial operation 1983 2003 2008 1988 1988 2010 2005

6. Is the Dam currently operated or closed as per currently approved design?

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

7. Raising method Downstream Downstream Downstream Upstream Hybrid Downstream Centerline

8. Current Maximum Height (m) 18 12 19.5 10 17 35 20

9. Current Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume (Mmᶾ)

5.4 0.1 0.685 5 5 5.5 31

10. Planned Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume in 5 years time (Mmᶾ)

5.4 0.1 0.685 5 5 11.4 34.7

11. Most Recent Independent Expert Review KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018)

12. Do you have full and complete relevant engineering records including design, construction, operation, maintenance, and/or closure


13. What is your hazard categorisation of this facility, based on the consequence of failure?

Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Medium

14. What guideline do you follow for the classification system?

ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) SANS 0286

15. Has this facility, at any point in its history, failed to be confirmed or certified as stable, or experienced notable stability concerns, as identified by an independent engineer (even if later certified as stable by the same or a different firm).

No No No No No No No

16. Do you have internal/in house engineering specialist oversight of this facility? Or do you have external engineering support for this purpose?

Both Both Both Both Both Both Both

17. Has a formal analysis of the downstream impact on communities, ecosystems and critical infrastructure in the event of catastrophic failure been undertaken and to reflect final conditions? If so, when did this assessment take place?

Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2018 No, -

18. Is there a) a closure plan in place for this dam, and b) does it include long term monitoring?

Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes

19. Have you, or do you plan to assess your tailings facilities against the impact of more regular extreme weather events as a result of climate change, e.g. over the next two years?


20. Any other relevant information (e.g. links to disclosures etc.). These clarifications relate to footnotes from other questions as follows:(1) Relates to Question 15; (2) Relates to Question 12; (3) Relates to Question 17; (4) Relates to Question 6; (5) Relates to Question 18; (6) Relates to Question 4; (7) Relates to Question 1; (8) Relates to Question 9; (9) Relates to Question 10


Glencore Region


2. Location3. Ownership4. Status5.Date of initial operation6. Is the Dam currently operated or closed as per currently approved design?7. Raising method8. Current Maximum Height (m)9. Current Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume (Mmᶾ)10. Planned Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume in 5 years time (Mmᶾ)11. Most Recent Independent Expert Review

12. Do you have full and complete relevant engineering records including design, construction, operation, maintenance, and/or closure13. What is your hazard categorisation of this facility, based on the consequence of failure?

14. What guideline do you follow for the classification system?15. Has this facility, at any point in its history, failed to be confirmed or certified as stable, or experienced notable stability concerns, as identified by an independent engineer (even if later certified as stable by the same or a different firm).16. Do you have internal/in house engineering specialist oversight of this facility? Or do you have external engineering support for this purpose?



19. Have you, or do you plan to assess your tailings facilities against the impact of more regular extreme weather events as a result of climate change, e.g. over the next two years?20. Any other relevant information (e.g. links to disclosures etc.). These clarifications relate to footnotes from other questions as follows:(1) Relates to Question 15; (2) Relates to Question 12; (3) Relates to Question 17; (4) Relates to Question 6; (5) Relates to Question 18; (6) Relates to Question 4; (7) Relates to Question 1; (8) Relates to Question 9; (9) Relates to Question 10

Africa Africa Africa Africa Africa Africa South America

iMpunzi Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, Phoenix, (ATCOM Phoenix Discard Dump)

iMpunzi Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, ATCOM, (ATCOM South Pit Discard Dump)

Tweefontein Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, Tweefontein, (Boschmans)

Tweefontein Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, Tweefontein, (New Tavistock Dump)

Tweefontein Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, Tweefontein, (Old Tavistock Dump)

Tweefontein Complex, Emalahleni, South Africa, Tweefontein, (New South Witbank Waste

Dump)

Cerrejon JV, Colombia, Cantor Facility, (Cantor Facility)

29°12'59"E, 26° 6'20"S 29°15'11"E, 26° 6'57"S 29° 7'40"E, 26° 2'12"S 29°11'19"E, 26° 9'6"S 29°11'44"E, 26° 8'21"S 29° 8'54"E, 26° 9'58"S 72°38'37"W, 11°06'20"N

Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary NOJV

Inactive Active Active Inactive Closed Inactive Active

1950 2015 2011 2006 2005 2005 2005


Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream

20 10 35 25 20 5 5

30 8 18.8 10 8.4 4.5 2.5

30 11 19.2 10 8.4 4.5 2.6

KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) HCI (2019)


Medium Low Low Low Low Low Significant

SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 CDA 2007 (2013)



No, - No, - No, - No, - No, - No, - Yes, 2005

Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, -



Glencore Region








Africa Africa Africa Africa Africa Africa Africa

Kamoto Copper Mine, Kolwezi, Democratic Republic of Congo, KITD, (South)

Kamoto Copper Mine, Kolwezi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Mupine Pit, (West Dam)

Mutanda Mumi Mine, Kolwezi, Democratic Republic of Congo

, Mumi 1, (SouthWestEast)


, Mumi 2, (SouthEast)


, Mumi 3, (NorthEast)SouthWest

Mopani Nkana Mine, Kitwe, Zambia, Nkana TD 15A, (Central Wall)

Mopani Copper, Kitwe, Zambia, Nkana TD 15, (East Wall)

25°23'30"E, 10°43'57"S 25°24'7"E, 10°41'59"S 25°48'29"E, 10°47'30"S 25°48'52"E, 10°47'29"S 25°51'39"E, 10°47'32"S 28° 6'58"E, 12°48'0"S 28° 9'9"E, 12°47'35"S

JV JV Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary JV JV

Inactive Active Inactive Active Active Active Closed

2007 2018 2009 2009 2014 1990 Pre 1980's


Centerline Hybrid Hybrid Downstream Downstream Upstream Upstream

12 6 33 18.5 32 30 13

4 0 (8) 6.07 0 17 106 10

0 20 0 0 27 126 10

KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018)


Medium High C NA NA NA Medium Low

SANS 0286 GOVDRC (2003)

SANS 0286 GOVDRC (2003)

SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286

No No No No No Yes(1) No

Both Both Both Both Both Both External

Yes, 2005 Yes, 2005 Yes, 2016 Yes, 2016 Yes, 2016 Yes, 2018 No, -

Yes, No Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, No Yes, No


(8) Tailings all contained within open-pit and dam wall structure not currently acting as a containmment

(1) Dam designed to be stable against multiple standards. Under an extreme earthquake scenario (1:500 to 1:1000 yr event), the dam does not meet criteria within CDA 2007 (2013) guidelines. Design and construction of a buttress to meet criteria within CDA guidelines 2007 (2013) is in progress.


Glencore Region








Africa Africa Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania

Mopani Copper, Mufulira, Zambia, Mufulira, (TD 11 TD2, 6, 7, & 9)

Mopani Copper, Mufulira, Zambia, Mufulira, (TD 3, 4, 5, & 8)

CSA Mine, Cobar, New South Wales, Australia, Southern Tailings Storage Facility, (South

Embankment)

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 5, (TD 5W)

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 5, TD 5/7E

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 5, TD 5/7W

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 5, TD 5W/NW

28°11'58"E, 12°32'48"S 28°14'26"E, 12°31'40"S 145°49'16"E, 31°24'40"S 139°27'12"E, 20°43'19"S 139°27'28"E, 20°43'58"S 139°27'17"E, 20°44'8"S 139°27'18"E, 20°43'22"S

JV JV Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary

Active Closed Active Active Active Active Active

1990 Pre 1980's 1965 1958 1993 1991 1958


Upstream Upstream Upstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream

30 30 25 35 13 15 8.5

79 10 10.6 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1

87 10 13 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5



Medium Low Significant High C High C High C High C

SANS 0286 SANS 0286 ANCOLD (2012) NSW DSC (2012)

ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012)

Yes(1) No No No No No No

Both External Both Both Both Both Both

Yes, 2018 No, - Yes, 2017 Yes, 2014 No (3) , - No (3) , - No (3) , -

Yes, No Yes, No Yes, No Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes


(1) Dam designed to be stable against multiple standards. Under an extreme earthquake scenario (1:500 to 1:1000 yr event), the dam does not meet criteria within CDA 2007 (2013) guidelines. Design and construction of a buttress to meet criteria within CDA guidelines 2007 (2013) is in progress.

(3) To meet the intent of the CoE disclosure request, Glencore have taken the approach to disclose all dams for our facilities to provide the fullest transparency of assets. As such in instances where a main dam has had a dam breach assessment undertaken to assess the consequence of a dam failure, a seperate assessment for auxiliary dams may not be required. In the case of the Mount Isa dams where there is a "no" against the auxiliary dams it means there is no standalone assessment of that particular structure. Notwithstanding, the downstream impact assessment from a failure of the auxillary dams has been considered through other methodologies.




Glencore Region








Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 5, TD 5W/N

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 7/8, TD 7W

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 7/8, (TD 8)

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 7/8, Kennedy's Wall

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 7/8, Saddle Dam 1,4

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 7/8, Saddle Dam 3

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 1/2, (NA)

139°27'14"E, 20°43'22"S 139°26'41.23"E, 20°45'58.34"S 139°27'30"E, 20°46'27"S 139°27'34"E, 20°44'50"S 139°26'2"E, 20°45'10"S 139°26'36"E, 20°45'11"S 139°28'53"E, 20°43'10"S

Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary

Active Active Active Active Active Active Closed

1958 1970 1970 1995 1997 2014 pre -1958


Downstream Upstream Upstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream

15 39 40 9.5 9.5 3.5 NA

2.1 375 (8) 375 (8) 375 (8) 375 (8) 375 (8) Unknown

1.5 415 (9) 415 (9) 415 (9) 415 (9) 415 (9) NA



High C Significant High A Significant Significant Significant Very Low

ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012)



No (3) , - Yes, 2019 Yes, 2017 No (3) , - No (3) , - No (3) , - No (3) , -

Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, NA Yes, NA Yes, NA



(8) 375Mm3 is the current tailings storage impoundment volume associated with TD5/7E, TD5/7W, TD7W, TD8, TD8 Saddle Dam 1/3/4 and Kennedy Saddle Dam(9) 415Mm3 is the planned tailings storage impoundment volume in 5 years time associated with TD5/7E, TD5/7W, TD7W, TD8, TD8 Saddle Dam 1/3/4 and Kennedy Saddle Dam.

(8) 375Mm3 is the current tailings storage impoundment volume associated with TD5/7E, TD5/7W, TD7W, TD8, TD8 Saddle Dam 1/3/4 and Kennedy Saddle Dam(9) 415Mm3 is the planned tailings storage impoundment volume in 5 years time associated with TD5/7E, TD5/7W, TD7W, TD8, TD8 Saddle Dam 1/3/4 and Kennedy Saddle Dam.

(3) To meet the intent of the CoE disclosure request, Glencore have taken the approach to disclose all dams for our facilities to provide the fullest transparency of assets. As such in instances where a main dam has had a dam breach assessment undertaken to assess the consequence of a dam failure, a seperate assessment for auxiliary dams may not be required. In the case of the Mount Isa dams where there is a "no" against the auxiliary dams it means there is no standalone assessment of that particular structure. Notwithstanding, the downstream impact assessment from a failure of the auxillary dams has been considered through other methodologies.(8) 375Mm3 is the current tailings storage impoundment volume associated with TD5/7E, TD5/7W, TD7W, TD8, TD8 Saddle Dam 1/3/4 and Kennedy Saddle Dam(9) 415Mm3 is the planned tailings storage impoundment volume in 5 years time associated with TD5/7E, TD5/7W, TD7W, TD8, TD8 Saddle Dam 1/3/4 and Kennedy Saddle Dam.





Glencore Region








Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania South America South America South America South America

Mt Isa Mine, Mt. Isa, Queensland, Australia, TD 4, (NA)

Ernest Henry Mine, Cloncurry, Queensland, Australia, North Cell, (North Wall)

Ernest Henry Mine, Cloncurry, Queensland, Australia, South Cell, South Wall

Minera Alumbrera, Argentina, TSF, (Presa de Relaves de ANTAMINA)

Antamina Mine, Peru, TSF, (Main Dam)

Antapaccay Mine, Espinar, Peru, Ccamacmayo TSF, (Main Dam)

Antapaccay Mine, Espinar, Peru, Huinipampa TSF, (Cross Valley Dam)

139°28'1"E, 20°43'33"S 140°43'52"E, 20°26'39"S 140°43'55"E, 20°27'37"S 66°33'50"W, 27°19'55"S 77° 1'55"W, 9°33'16"S 71°18'24"W, 14°51'27"S 71°22'21"W, 14°54'56"S

Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary JV NOJV Subsidiary Subsidiary

Closed Active Active Inactive Active Closed Closed

pre -1958 2004 1998 1998 1998 1988 2002


Downstream Upstream Upstream Modified Centerline Downstream/Centerline Hybrid Centerline

NA 27 24.5 125 240 75 35

Unknown 25 65 450 374 60 42

NA 129 110 450 600 60 42

KCB (2017) Coffey (2016) Coffey (2016) KCB (2018) KCB (2019) KP (2018) KP (2018)


Very Low Significant Significant Very High Extreme High High

ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013)


Both External External Both External Both Both

No (3) , - Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018

Yes, NA Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes




Glencore Region








South America South America South America Canada Canada Canada Canada

Antapaccay Mine, Espinar, Peru, Tintaya Pit TSF, (Pit Dam)

Cia. Minera Doña Ines de Collahuasi, Collahuasi Pampa Pabellón TFS , (TSF Embankment)

Altonorte, Chile, Process pond, (Altonorte Process Pond)

Louvicourt, Quebec, Canada, Tailings Storage Facility, (Dam 2) (7)

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, West Dam (North

Section)

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, West Dam (South

Section)

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, South Dam

71°19'29"W, 14°54'16"S 68° 36' 16" W, 20° 56' 43" S 70°20'41.6"W, 23°48'22.7"S 77°36'5"W, 48° 7'57"N 65°53'2"W, 47°29'8"N 65°52'58"W, 47°28'40"N 65°52'23"W, 47°28'20"N

Subsidiary NOJV Subsidiary NOJV Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary

Active Active Active Closed (6) Closed Closed Closed

2012 1999 1999 1993 1964 1964 1964


NA Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Upstream Upstream

30 72 31 15 15 15 15

160 467 6.2 5.99 71.4 71.4 71.4

317 658 1.4 5.99 71.4 71.4 71.4

KP (2018) Wood (2018) SNC (2016) SNC (2017) KCB (2017) KCB (2017) KCB (2017)


Significant Low Significant Very High High Low Significant

CDA 2007 (2013) Supreme Decree No. 248/2007 CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013)


Both Both External Both Both Both Both

Yes, 2018 Yes, 2017 No, - Yes, 2013 No, - No, - No, -



(6) The site ceased operations in 2005 and is closed. The closure plan is being implemented. (7) Other Dams at this TSF are Dam 1, Dam 3, Dam 1A, Dam 1B, Dam 1C, Dam 1D, Dam 1E. This TSF has been reported to match the disclosure of our NOJV Partner.


Glencore Region








Canada Canada Canada Canada USA USA Canada

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, (East Dam E1)

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, East Dam E2

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, East Dam E3

Brunswick Mine, New Brunswick, Canada, Mine 12 Tailings Impoundment, North Dam

Blackbird, Lemhi County, Idaho, USA, West Fork TSF, (West Fork TSF)

Grey Eagle, California, USA, Tailings Storage Facility, (Tailings Dam)

Mines Gaspe', Murdochville, Quebec, Canada, Dam 6, Dam 6

65°52'6"W, 47°29'2"N 65°52'6"W, 47°29'2"N 65°52'6"W, 47°29'2"N 65°52'38"W, 47°29'28"N 114°18'34"W, 45° 5'29"N 123°22'28"W, 41°51'49"N 65°26'15"W, 48°55'9"N


Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed

1964 1964 1964 1964 1950 1982 1973


Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Downstream Downstream

35 35 35 20 40 131 15

71.4 71.4 71.4 71.4 1.1 1 0.15

71.4 71.4 71.4 71.4 1.1 1 0.15


Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No (2)

Significant Low Low Low Significant Significant Significant

CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) USFS (FSM 7511) CDA 2007 (2013)



Yes, 2015 Yes, 2015 Yes, 2015 No, - Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017

Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes (5), Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes


(5) Glencore and Rio Tinto jointly perform response actions in accordance with governmental orders and agreements associated with Blackbird. In reference to the response to question 18a, response actions have been performed at the TSF pursuant to United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrative orders, and monitoring and maintenance is performed under an EPA-approved operation and maintenance plan. These documents are equivalent to a closure plan.

(2) Design documentation is not available for Dam 6. Additional geotechnical assessments are in progress.


Glencore Region








Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada

Mines Gaspe', Murdochville, Quebec, Canada, Tailings Storage Facility 1, (Tailings Dam 1)



Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario, Canada , Geco Tailings Facility, CP Dam

Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario, Canada , Geco Tailings Facility, (CN1 Dam)

Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario, Canada , Geco Tailings Facility, CN2 Dam

Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario, Canada , Geco Tailings Facility, CP3 Dam

65°27'39"W, 48°55'34"N 65°28'17"W, 48°55'19"N 65°29'56"W, 48°55'0"N 85°46'20"W, 49° 9'47"N 85°46'52"W, 49° 9'44"N 85°46'52"W, 49° 9'44"N 85°46'52"W, 49° 9'44"N



1955 1963 1972 1955 1955 1991 1980


Upstream Upstream Downstream Upstream Upstream Downstream Upstream

35 44 54 35 35 26 12

26.7 34.9 5.08 40 40 40 40

26.7 34.9 5.08 40 40 40 40



Low High Low High High High High

CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013)



Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017 Yes, 2017




Glencore Region









Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario, Canada , Geco Tailings Facility, E1-E2 Dam

Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario, Canada , Geco Tailings Facility, E3 Dam

Heath Steele, New Brunswick, Canada, Tailings Management Area , (Main Dam)

Heath Steele, New Brunswick, Canada, Tailings Management Area , Powerline Dam

Heath Steele, New Brunswick, Canada, Tailings Management Area , (Internal Dam)

Mattabi, Ontario, Canada, Mattabi TSF, (Main Dam)

Mattabi, Ontario, Canada, Mattabi TSF, East Tailings Dam

85°46'52"W, 49° 9'44"N 85°46'52"W, 49° 9'44"N 66° 3'46"W, 47°16'15"N 66° 4'4"W, 47°16'55"N 66° 4'30"W, 47°16'21"N 90°57'1"W, 49°52'6"N 90°57'1"W, 49°52'6"N



1981 1988 1962 1996 1990 1971 1971


Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Upstream Upstream

15 9.2 21 20 6 10 4

40 40 15.7 15.7 15.7 10 10

40 40 15.7 15.7 15.7 10 10



High Significant Very High Very High Very High High High








Glencore Region









Mattabi, Ontario, Canada, Mattabi TSF, South Tailings Dam

Willroy, Ontario, Canada, Tailings Storage Facility, (Dam D/G)

Brenda, British Columbia, Canada, Tailings Storage Facility, (Main Dam)

Brenda, British Columbia, Canada, Tailings Storage Facility, Saddle Dam

Boss Mountain, British Columbia, Canada, Boss Tailings Storage Facility, (Main Dam)

Boss Mountain, British Columbia, Canada, Boss Tailings Storage Facility, North Tailings Berm

Bell, British Columbia, Canada, Main Tailings Impoundment, (Dam 1)

90°57'1"W, 49°52'6"N 85°49'47"W, 49° 9'56"N 119°57'5"W, 49°51'35"N 119°57'6.99"W, 49°51'41.79"N 120°52'10"W, 52° 5'35"N 120°52'10"W, 52° 5'35"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N



1971 1950 1969 1979 1977 1977 1970


Upstream Upstream Centerline Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream

8 21 140 38 15 5 52

10 5.3 133 133 5 5 48

10 5.3 133 133 5 5 48

KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KP (2016) KP (2016) Wood (2019) Wood (2019) Wood (2019)


High High Extreme Extreme High Low Low








Glencore Region









Bell, British Columbia, Canada, Main Tailings Impoundment, Dam 2





Bell, British Columbia, Canada, Tailings Expansion, (Dam 7)

Bell, British Columbia, Canada, Tailings Expansion, Dam 8

126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N 126°13'56.39"W, 55° 0'11.14"N



1978 1974 1980 1980 1972 1980 1989



15 21 21 30 46 55 30

48 48 48 48 48 1 1

48 48 48 48 48 1 1

Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018)


Low Low Low Low Low Low Low








Glencore Region









Granisle, British Columbia, Canada, Granisle No. 1 Tailings Impoundment, (Dam 1)

Granisle, British Columbia, Canada, No. 2 Tailings Impoundment, Dam 3

Granisle, British Columbia, Canada, No. 2 Tailings Impoundment, (Dam 4)

Granisle, British Columbia, Canada, No. 2 Tailings Impoundment, Dam 5

Fonderie Horne,Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada, Quémont-2

TSF, (A)


TSF, AB


TSF, B

126°10'21"W, 54°56'20"N 126°10'21"W, 54°56'20"N 126°10'21"W, 54°56'20"N 126°10'21"W, 54°56'20"N 78°58'42"W, 48°16'5"N 78°59'7"W, 48°16'1"N 78°59'27"W, 48°16'3"N


Closed Closed Closed Closed Inactive Inactive Inactive

1966 1968 1970 1970 1989 1989 1989


Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Centerline Centerline

12 60 75 19 9 2.5 11

4 30 30 30 8.2 8.2 8.2

4 30 30 30 8.2 8.2 8.2

Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018) Wood (2018) KCB (2017) KCB (2017) KCB (2017)


Low Low Low Low Very High Very High Very High








Glencore Region










TSF, C


TSF, D


TSF, E


TSF, F


TSF, (G)

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 5 Polishing Pond, (South

Dyke)

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 5 Polishing Pond, North-East

Dyke

78°59'46"W, 48°16'6"N 78°59'59"W, 48°16'11"N 78°59'56"W, 48°16'18"N 78°59'48"W, 48°16'26"N 78°59'43"W, 48°16'21"N 79° 5'18"W, 48°13'35"N 79° 5'18"W, 48°13'35"N


Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Active Active

1989 1989 1989 1989 1995 2012 2012


Centerline Unknown Unknown Unknown Upstream Downstream Centerline

10 13 14 12 11 9.5 9.5

8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 2.9 2.9

8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 2.9 2.9



Very High High High Very High Very High Very High Very High








Glencore Region








Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Africa

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 5 Polishing Pond, West Dyke

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Waite Amulet TSF (Acid rock drainage

water pond), (Principal Dike)

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 5, (Dyke N5-2)

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 5, Dyke N5-1

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 5, Dyke N5-3

Fonderie Horne, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada , Noranda 4, (Principal Dyke)

Boshoek Smelter Complex, North West Province, South Africa, Boshoek Smelter,

(Slimes)

79° 5'18"W, 48°13'35"N 79° 4'30.76"W, 48°19'50.84"N 79° 5'40"W, 48°13'16"N 79° 5'40"W, 48°13'16"N 79° 5'40"W, 48°13'16"N 79° 4'24"W, 48°13'48"N 27° 6'55"E, 25°29'12"S

Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary JV

Active Closed Active Active Active Inactive Active

2012 1973 2015 2015 2015 1947 2005


Centerline Centerline Upstream Centerline Upstream Downstream Downstream

9.5 3 6.3 8 2.8 9.1 7.2

2.9 0.65 5 5 5 1.88 0.03

2.9 0.65 7.5 7.5 7.5 1.88 0.04

KCB (2018) Golder (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018)


Very High NA Very High High High High High

CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) SANS 0286



Yes, 2018 No, - Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018




Glencore Region









Rustenburg Smelter, Rustenburg, South Africa , Rustenburg Smelter, (Slimes 1, 2, 3)

Rustenburg Smelter, Rustenburg, South Africa , Rustenburg Smelter, (Slimes 4)

Wonderkop Smelter, North West Province, South Africa

, Wonderkop Smelter, (Slimes Dam 1)

Wonderkop Smelter, North West Province, South Africa , Wonderkop Smelter, (Slimes Dam

2)

Wonderkop Smelter, North West Province, South Africa

, Wonderkop Smelter, (Slimes Dam 3)

Rhovan Mine, North West Province, South Africa , Rhovan TSF, (Dam 1)

Rhovan Mine, North West Province, South Africa , Rhovan TSF, (Dam 2)

27°13'30"E, 25°36'56"S 27°13'34"E, 25°36'52"S 27°24'18"E, 25°42'57"S 27°24'11"E, 25°42'59"S 27°24'12"E, 25°43'4"S 27°34'33"E, 25°34'5"S 27°34'39"E, 25°33'43"S

JV JV JV JV JV JV JV

Inactive Active Inactive Inactive Active Inactive Active

1980 2016 1997 2004 2013 1996 2012


Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream

20 6 17 25 8 35 16

0.4 0.16 0.06 0.1 0.006 13.4 6

0.4 0.28 0.06 0.1 0.29 13.4 10



Significant High Significant Significant High High High

SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286

No No No No No Yes(1) Yes(1)





(1) Dam designed against South African standards. Under an extreme earthquake scenario (1:1000 yr event), the dam does not meet criteria within CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). Additional investigations and assessments are being undertaken in order to enable works to be carried out to align facility with CDA guidelines.

(1) Dam designed against national standards. Under an extreme earthquake scenario (1:1000 yr event), the dam does not meet acceptance criteria against CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). Additional investigations and assessments are being undertaken in order to enable works to be carried out to align facility with CDA guidelines.


Glencore Region









Kroondal Mine, North West Province, South Africa

, Kroondal TSF, (TSF)

Waterval Mine, North West Province, South Africa

, Waterval TSF, (West)

Waterval Mine, North West Province, South Africa

, Waterval TSF, (East)

Rietvly Silica Mine, South Africa , Rietvly, (Silica TSF)

Lydenburg Smelter, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

, Lydenburg Smelter, (Furnace Slimes - Dam 11)

Lion Smelter, Mpumalanga, South Africa , Lion Smelter, (Cell 1)

Lion Smelter, Mpumalanga, South Africa , Lion Smelter, (Cell 2 and 3)

27°21'22"E, 25°42'59"S 27°16'8"E, 25°41'4"S 27°16'12"E, 25°41'3"S 27° 7'59"E, 25°37'47"S 30°28'12"E, 25° 4'3"S 30° 6'58"E, 24°49'25"S 30° 7'1"E, 24°49'20"S

JV JV JV JV JV JV JV

Active Closed Closed Active Active Active Active

2002 Unknown Unknown 2017 1997 2006 2012



13.5 10.3 18.8 5 19 20 15

0.4 0.38 0.045 0.2 0.55 0.28 0.52

0.53 0.38 0.045 0.26 0.67 0.41 1



High Low Low High Significant Significant Significant

SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286 SANS 0286

Yes(1) No No No No No No





(1) Dam designed against national standards. Under an extreme earthquake scenario (1:1000 yr event), the dam does not meet acceptance criteria against CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). Additional investigations and assessments are being undertaken in order to enable works to be carried out to align facility with CDA guidelines.


Glencore Region








Africa Africa Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada

Thorncliffe Chrome Mine, Mpumalanga, South Africa

, Thorncliffe TSF, (North Tailings Disposal Dam)

Helena Chromium Mine, Mpumalanga, South Africa

, Helena TSF, (Tailings Dam)

Onaping Area Mines, Ontario, Canada, Strathcona/Onaping, (Strathcona Tailings Area

Dam 3A & 3B)

Onaping Area Mines, Ontario, Canada, Strathcona/Onaping, (Neutralizing Reservoir

Dam)

Onaping Area Mines, Ontario, Canada, Strathcona/Onaping, (Polishing Reservoir Dam)

Smelter Complex, Ontario, Canada, Smelter Complex, (Dam 1)

Smelter Complex, Ontario, Canada, Smelter Complex, Dam 12

30° 7'29"E, 24°57'38"S 30° 7'11"E, 25° 0'1"S 81°18'40"W, 46°39'33"N 81°20'7"W, 46°38'34"N 81°20'59.91"W, 46°38'42.52"N 80°46'57"W, 46°35'32"N 80°47'9.86"W, 46°35'52.35"N

JV JV Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary

Active Inactive Active Active Inactive Inactive Inactive

2017 2007 2001 1968 Unknown Unknown Unknown

Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Upstream Upstream Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline

14 10 13 15 8 13 17

0.41 0.12 4 9 0 Unknown Unknown

0.76 0.12 4 10 0 Unknown Unknown


Yes Yes Yes No (2) No (2) Yes Yes

Significant Significant Very High Very High Very High High High

SANS 0286 SANS 0286 CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013)

No No No Yes(1) Yes(1) No No


Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 No, - Yes, 2019 Yes, 2019 No (3), - No (3), -



(1) (2) Geotechnical investigations were undertaken in 2017 and 2018. A new assessment of the dam is being undertaken in the first half of 2019 for the new hazard categorisation of 'Very High' based on the consequence of failure as per KCB’s recommendation.

(1) (2) Geotechnical investigations were undertaken in 2017 and 2018. A new assessment of the dam is being undertaken in the first half of 2019 for the new hazard categorisation of 'Very High' based on the consequence of failure as per KCB’s recommendation.

(3) Work currently in progress (3) Work currently in progress


Glencore Region








Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania

Smelter Complex, Ontario, Canada, Smelter Complex, East Mine Tailings

Nickel Rim Mine, Ontario, Canada, Nickel Rim South, NR-2

Nickel Rim Mine, Ontario, Canada, Nickel Rim South, (Moose Lake Dam)

Raglan Mine, Quebec, Canada, Raglan, (Tailings Dry Stack)

Hardy Mine, Ontario, Canada, Hardy Mine, (Tailings Dam)

Murrin Murrin Mine, Western Australia, Paddock TSF - North, (North Dam)

Murrin Murrin Mine, Western Australia, Paddock TSF - South, (South Dam)

80°47'08.88"W, 46°34'44.47"N 80°47'51"W, 46°39'39"N 80°48'17"W, 46°40'13"N 73°40'42.29"W, 61°41'14.73"N 81°24'28"W, 46°38'13"N 121° 55' 3.02" E, 28° 46' 8.45" S 121° 54' 30.66" E, 28° 45' 29.34" S


Inactive Inactive Inactive Active Closed Inactive Inactive

1946 2003 Unknown 1998 Unknown 1998 1998


Upstream Downstream Downstream Drystack Downstream Upstream Upstream

15 5 2.5 35 15 14.5 14.5

9 0 Unknown 11 Unknown 17.8 18

9 0 Unknown 14 Unknown 17.8 18

KCB (2017) KCB (2017) KCB (2017) KCB (2019) KCB (2018) Coffey 2018 Coffey 2018


High Significant Significant Significant High High High

CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) DMIRS DMIRS


Both Both Both Both Both External External

No, - No, - No, - Yes, 2019 No, - No (3), - No (3), -



(3) Low dam inactive and dam break assessment in progress

(3) Low dam inactive and dam break assessment in progress


Glencore Region









CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Jarosite, (North)

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Jarosite, North-East

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Jarosite Triangular, North-West

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Ferrite, (West)

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Ferrite, North

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Ferrite, South

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, UNA, (North-West)

74° 7'39"W, 45°14'05"N 74° 7'11"W, 45°13'51"N 74° 7'25"W, 45°13'53"N 74° 6'32"W, 45°13'43"N 74° 6'32"W, 45°13'51"N 74° 6'15"W, 45°13'41"N 74° 6'15"W, 45°14'7"N


Active Closed Active Active Active Active Active

1990 1977 1982 1973 1970 1973 1966

No (4) Yes Yes No (4) No (4) No (4) Yes


6 5.5 6 3.5 3.5 3 11

1.2 Unknown NA 1.5 0.5 Unknown 4

1.2 Unknown NA 1.6 0.5 Unknown 4.3



Very High High High High Significant Very High High




Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018



(4) Additional assessments are in progress to address the findings raised by auditors.





Glencore Region








Canada Canada Europe Europe Europe Asia Asia

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, UNA, South

CEZinc Processing Plant, Quebec, Canada, Jarofix, (North Dyke)

Asturiana De Zinc Smelter, Spain, Tailings Management Facility, (Balsa I)

Asturiana De Zinc Smelter, Spain, Tailings Management Facility, (Balsa II)

Asturiana De Zinc Smelter, Spain, Tailings Management Facility, (Balsa III)

Zhairem Mine, Kazakhstan, Zhairem, (Slurry settler, Lead Gravity concentrator)

Zhairem Mine, Kazakhstan, Zhairem, (Flotation)

74° 6'17"W, 45°14'1"N 74° 4'33"W, 45°13'52"N 5°56'22"W, 43°34'53"N 5°56'34"W, 43°34'48"N 5°56'17"W, 43°35'1"N 70°12'59"E, 48°17'36"N 70°15'33"E, 48°13'18"N

Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary JV JV

Active Active Closed Closed Active Active Inactive

1966 1997 1967 1985 1995 2000 2020


Upstream Drystack Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Centerline

11.5 3 20 20 20 10 10

4 3 0.5 1.3 1 0.7 0.6

4.3 4 0.5 1.3 1.5 0.7 17.9


Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes

High Low Low Low High IV (4) IV (4)

CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) Spanish Ministry of Public Works Spanish Ministry of Public Works Spanish Ministry of Public Works SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008



Yes , 2018 Yes , 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2018 Yes, 2016 Yes, 2016




Glencore Region

1. "Tailings Facility" Name/Identifier (Main DamBracketed)

2. Location3. Ownership4. Status5.Date of initial operation6. Is the Dam currently operated or closed as per currently approved design?7. Raising method8. Current Maximum Height (m)9. Current Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume(Mmᶾ)10. Planned Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume in 5 years time (Mmᶾ)11. Most Recent Independent Expert Review


14. What guideline do you follow for theclassification system?15. Has this facility, at any point in its history, failed to be confirmed or certified as stable, or experienced notable stability concerns, as identified by an independent engineer (even if later certified as stable by the same or a different firm).16. Do you have internal/in house engineering specialist oversight of this facility? Or do you haveexternal engineering support for this purpose?



19. Have you, or do you plan to assess your tailingsfacilities against the impact of more regular extreme weather events as a result of climate change, e.g. over the next two years?20. Any other relevant information (e.g. links to disclosures etc.). These clarifications relate to footnotes from other questions as follows:(1) Relates to Question 15; (2) Relates to Question 12; (3) Relates to Question 17; (4) Relates to Question 6; (5) Relates to Question 18; (6) Relates to Question 4; (7) Relates to Question 1; (8) Relates to Question 9; (9) Relates to Question 10

Asia Asia Asia Asia Asia Australia / Oceania Australia / Oceania

Zhairem Mine, Kazakhstan, Zhairem, (Slurry settler, manganese gravity concentrator)

Altyntau-Kokshetau Complex, Kazakhstan

, Altyntau-Kokshetau, (Flotation)

Zyryanovsky Concentrator, Kazakhstan

, Zyryanovsky, (West)

Ridder Mine, Kazakhstan, Chashinsky, (West) Ridder Mine, Kazakhstan, Talovsky, (South) George Fisher Mine, Queensland, Australia, GFM TSF, (Main Dam)

McArthur River Mine, Northern Territory, Australia, Tailings Storage Facility, (Perimeter

Embankment)

70°18'50"В, 48°22'39"С 69°11'34"E, 53°24'39"N 84°19'17"E, 49°46'57"N 83°35'49"E, 50°21'46"N 83°35'19"E, 50°23'46"N 139°27'53"E, 20°33'33"S 136° 3'45"E, 16°24'58"S

JV JV JV JV JV Subsidiary Subsidiary

Active Active Active Inactive Active Inactive Active

1996 2009 1968 1953 1973 1989 1995

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Downstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Downstream Upstream

10 23 45 69 64 25.3 15

0.6 45 92 84 115 3 22

0.6 60 99 84 123 3 35

KCB (2016) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KP (2017)


IV (4) III (4) II (4) III (4) I (4) Significant High C

SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 ANCOLD (2012) ANCOLD (2012)

No Yes(1) Yes(1) Yes(1) Yes(1) No No



Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes (5), Yes


(1) Dam designed against SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 Standards but does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). A buttress is currently under construction and designed to meet criteria within the CDA guidelines 2007 (2013).

(1) Dam designed against SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 standards but does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). A buttress is currently under construction and designed to meet criteria within the CDA guidelines 2007 (2013).

(1) Dam designed against SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 standards and may not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). Cone penetration testing is being progressed to further assess the factor of safetyagainst CDA guidelines 2007 (2013).

(1) Dam designed against SNIP RK 3.04-01-2008 standards but does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013). A buttress is currently under construction and designed to meet criteria within the CDA guidelines 2007 (2013).

(5) The closure plan proposes to reprocess tailings, backfill the pit and then decommissiondam.


Glencore Region









Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, TMA Pond A, (West Dam)

Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, TMA Pond C, West Dam

Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, TMA Pond C, South Dam

Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, TMA Corky's Pond, Dyke

Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, Tailings Management Area (TMA),

Perimeter Dyke

Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, TMA Pond D, West Dam

Kidd Metallurgical Site, Timmins, Ontario, Canada, TMA Pond E, North Dam

81° 6'25"W, 48°33'29"N 81° 7'2"W, 48°34'8"N 81° 6'40"W, 48°33'53"N 81° 4'10"W, 48°34'14"N 81° 5'48"W, 48°35'35"N 81° 6'55"W, 48°33'27"N 81° 7'8"W, 48°33'42"N


Active Active Active Active Active Active Active

1966 1966 1969 1969 1969 1969 2001


Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline Centreline Centerline

10 7 6 4 6 6.5 7

80 80 80 80 80 NA NA

88 88 88 88 88 NA NA



High High High Low High High Significant








Glencore Region









Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, Central Pond, (Lalanne Dyke)

Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, Central Pond, Central Dyke

Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, West Pond, North Freeboard Dyke

Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, West Pond, (West Dyke)

Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, West Pond, North-South Dyke

Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, West Pond, East-West Dyke

Matagami Mine, Quebec, Canada, South Pond, (South Dyke)

77°46'2,17"W, 49°44'38,35"N 77°46'2"W, 49°44'10"N 77°46'55"W, 49°44'49"N 77°47'46"W, 49°44'35"N 77°46'48"W, 49°44'22"N 77°47'22.81"W, 49°43'57.56"N 77°46'3"W, 49°43'10"N


Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Active

2002 1973 2007 1977 1995 1998 1969


Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline Centerline NA

8.9 3.3 1.6 5.5 5 2.7 3

8.07 8.07 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 3.08

8.07 8.07 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 7.95



High Significant Significant Significant Significant Low Significant








Glencore Region








South America South America South America South America South America South America South America

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Bolivar Mine, Bolivia, Bolivar, (Queaqueani)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Bolivar Mine, Bolivia, Bolivar, (Antiguo)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Don Diego Mine, Bolivia, Don Diego, (Chilimoco)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Don Diego Mine, Bolivia, Don Diego, (Yana Khasa)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Don Diego Mine, Bolivia, Don Diego, (1, 2 & 3)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Porco Mine, Bolivia, Porco, (Dique D)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Porco Mine, Bolivia, Porco, (Dique C)

66° 52'25"W, 18°27'54"S 66° 51'44"W, 18°28'10"S 65° 36'37"W, 19°30'40"S 65° 35'53"W, 19°29'46"S 65° 35'59"W, 19°30'0"S 66° 0'28"W, 19°46'58"S 65°58'59"W, 19°47'11"S


Active Inactive Active Inactive Inactive Active Inactive

2006 1995 2003 1993 1978 1998 1996


Downstream Upstream Downstream Upstream Upstream Downstream Upstream

33.5 34 53 40 15 23 12.5

2.6 1.8 1.9 1.6 0.4 5.2 1

5.5 1.8 3.65 1.6 0.4 8.53 1



Extreme Significant Extreme High Low Extreme Low




Yes, 2018 No, 2018 Yes, 2018 No, 2018 No (3), 2018 Yes, 2018 No (3), 2018



(3) Historic low height TSF with limited deformation/runout potential.



Glencore Region









Sinchi Wayra Operations, Porco Mine, Bolivia, Porco, (Dique B)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Porco Mine, Bolivia, Porco, (Dique A)

Sinchi Wayra Operations, Porco Mine, Bolivia, Porco, (Dique 1)





65°58'59"W, 19°47'11"S 65°58'58"W, 19°47'22"S 65°58'36"W, 19°46'30"S 66° 58'41.97"W, 19°46'26.91"S 65° 58'34.92"W, 19°46'35.19"S 66° 58'25.44"W, 19°46'34.71"S 66° 58'15.65"W, 19°46'33.78"S


Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive

1993 1991 1978 1978 1978 1982 1987



40 30.8 25 23.5 10.4 20 13.5

0.29 0.25 0.74 0.19 0.09 0.25 0.13

0.29 0.25 0.74 0.19 0.09 0.25 0.13



Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant




No (3), 2018 No (3), 2018 No (3), 2018 No (3), 2018 No (3), 2018 No (3), 2018 No (3), 2018











Glencore Region









Aguilar Mine, Argentina, Cola 7, (South) Aguilar Mine, Argentina, Cola 6, (North) Aguilar Mine, Argentina, Colas 5, (East) Aguilar Mine, Argentina, Colas 4 , (East) Contonga Mine, Peru, Tucush TSF, (Dam) Contonga Mine, Peru, Pajuscocha TSF, (Pile) Iscaycruz Mine, Peru, Tinyag TSF, (North Dike)

65°36'23"W, 23°12'38"S 65°36'45"W, 23°12'13"S 65°37'32"W, 23°11'50"S 65°37'13.80"W, 23°11'31.78"S 77° 4'16"W, 9°30'33"S 77° 4'55"W, 9°30'8"S 76°43'40"W, 10°47'23"S


Active Inactive Closed Closed Active Closed Inactive

2015 2007 1995 1965 2008 1984 1996


Downstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Centerline Upstream Upstream

35 12.5 26 13 40 15 12

1.5 6 4.7 14.5 0.17 0.05 3.2

3.5 6 4.7 14.5 2 0.05 3.2

KCB (2018) KCB (2018) KCB (2016) KCB (2016) Draft KCB (2018) Draft KCB (2018) KP (2017)


High High Low Low Very High Low High




Yes, 2016 Yes, 2016 No (3), - No (3), - Yes, 2018 No (3), - Yes, 2018

No (5), - No (5), - No (5), NA NA, NA Yes, Yes Yes, Yes Yes, Yes


(5) Contracts for preparation of closure plans arebeing issued.

(5) Contracts for preparation of closure plans arebeing issued.

(3) Historic low height TSF that has been resloped and covered.(5) Contracts for preparation of closure plans arebeing issued.

(3) Historic low height TSF that has been resloped and covered.



Glencore Region









Iscaycruz Mine, Peru, Escondida TSF, (Dam 3) Iscaycruz Mine, Peru, Geniococha TSF, (Dam 1) Yauliyacu mine, Peru, Chinchán, (Cross Valley Dam)

Yauliyacu mine, Peru, Rosaura, (Cross Valley Dam)

San Cristobal Mining Unit, Mahr Tunel, Peru , Mahr Tunel, (TSF 1-2)

San Cristobal Mining Unit, Mahr Tunel, Peru , Mahr Tunel, (TSF 3)

San Cristobal Mining Unit, Mahr Tunel, Peru , Mahr Tunel, (TSF 4/5)

76°43'19"W, 10°47'1"S 76°43'10"W, 10°47'27"S 76°14'00"W, 11°35'52"S 76°15'46"W, 11°40'37"S 76° 3'9"W, 11°37'39"S 76° 3'1"W, 11°37'33"S 76° 2'44"W, 11°37'29"S


Inactive Inactive Active Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive

2006 2012 1982 2004 1970 1970 1970


Centerline Downstream Centerline Downstream Upstream Upstream Upstream

20 47 101 40 22 67 57

1.6 3.7 27.3 2.2 0.7 2.2 2

3.12 4.4 32 2.2 0.7 2.2 2

KP (2017) KP (2017) KP (2017) KP (2017) Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)


High High Extreme Extreme Low High High


No No No Yes(1) No No No





(1) There may be a potential for deformations under extreme earthquake scenarios and a detailed assessment is being progressed to assess this risk.


Glencore Region









San Cristobal Mining Unit, Mahr Tunel, Peru , Mahr Tunel, (TSF 6)

Carahuacra Mining Unit, Junin, Peru , Rumichaca, (Dique 1/2)

Carahuacra Mining Unit, Junin, Peru , Carachuacra 1 to 3, (TSF 1-3)

Carahuacra Mining Unit, Junin, Peru , Carahuacra 4, (TSF 4)



Ticlio Mining Unit, Ticlio, Peru , Ticlio TSF, (Main Dam)

76° 2'34"W, 11°37'23"S 76° 6'30"W, 11°41'45"S 76° 5'30"W, 11°41'2"S 76° 5'30"W, 11°41'2"S 76° 5'30"W, 11°41'2"S 76° 5'30"W, 11°41'2"S 76°11'48"W, 11°36'35"S


Active Active Closed Closed Closed Closed Active

2008 1999 1982 1982 1982 1982 1950


Centerline Downstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream Upstream

51 35 18 35 38 28 12

2.66 14.6 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5

2.8 18 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)


Extreme Extreme Low Significant High Very High High


Yes(1) Yes(1) No No No No No





1) Audits indicate the dam does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013) for extreme flood events. Verification of required flood controls and remedial works to bring in alignment with CDA guidelines is in progress. The TSF is sheduled to stop operations by the end of 2019.

(1) Audits indicate dam does not meet CDA guidelines for extreme flood events. Verification of required flood controls and remedial works to bring in alignment with CDA guidelines in progress.


Glencore Region









Andaychagua Mining Unit, Junin, Peru , Andaychagua Alto, (Andaychagua Alto)

Andaychagua Mining Unit, Junin, Peru , Andaychagua Bajo, (Andaychagua Bajo)

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , Ocroyoc TSF, (Main Dam)

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , Vinchos TSF's, (Vinchos 1, 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 6 and 7)

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , Vinchos 5, (Vinchos 5)

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , El Pilar, (El Pilar Deposit 1)

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , El Pilar, El Pilar Deposit 2

76° 0'12"W, 11°45'6"S 75°59'36"W, 11°45'26"S 76°17'49"W, 10°41'25"S 76°17'1"W, 10°26'18"S 76°17'1"W, 10°26'1"S 76°15'55"W, 10°38'9"S 76°15'55.90"W, 10°38'7.92"S


Active Inactive Active Inactive Inactive Closed Closed

2009 1990 1980 Unknown Unknown 1949 1949


Downstream Downstream Downstream Unknown Unknown Upstream Upstream

47 67 47 10 20 14 17

8.26 3.9 15.9 0.11 0.075 0.02 0.03

11 3.9 24.9 0.11 0.075 0.02 0.03

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Extreme Extreme Extreme Low Low Significant Significant


Yes(1) Yes(1) Yes(1) No No No No





(1) Audits indicate the dam does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013) for extreme flood events. Verification of required flood controls and remedial works to meet criteria under the CDA guidelines is in progress.

(1) Audits indicate the dam does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013) for extreme flood events. Verification of required flood controls and remedial works to meet acceptance criteria under the CDA guidelines is in progress.

(1) Audits indicate the dam does not meet CDA guidelines 2007 (2013) for extreme flood events. Verification of required flood controls and remedial works to meet criteria under the CDA guidelines is in progress.


Glencore Region








South America South America South America South America South America

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , El Pilar, El Pilar Deposit 3

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , San Sebastian TSF, (TSF 1-3)

Cerro de Pasco Mining Unit, Peru , San Sebastian TSF, (TSF 4)

Chungar Mining Unit, Huayllay District, Peru , Chungar Animon, (TSF)

Alpamarca Mining Unit, Peru , Alpamarca TSF, (TSF)

76°15'55.80"W, 10°38'5.43"S 76°11'35"W, 10°37'16"S 76°11'23"W, 10°37'12"S 76°25'12"W, 11° 2'10"S 76°27'37"W, 11°12'32"S

Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary Subsidiary

Closed Inactive Inactive Active Active

1949 Unknown Unknown 1980 2014

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Upstream Unknown Unknown Downstream Downstream

14 18 12 36 40

0.03 0.01 0.008 6.55 3.6

0.03 0.01 0.008 7.3 6.4

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Draft KCB (2019)

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Significant Significant Significant Very High Extreme

CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013) CDA 2007 (2013)

No No No No No

Both Both Both Both Both

Yes, 2019 Yes (3), 2019 Yes (3), 2019 Yes, 2019 Yes, 2019

Yes, Yes No, NA No, NA Yes, Yes Yes, Yes

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

(3) Draft under review (3) Draft under review

Glencore plc

Last updated 14.06.2019 32 of 34

Explanatory Notes

Question Number / Description Disclosure Request Accompanying Notes Comment for the disclosure

1. "Tailings Facility" Name/Identifier Please identify every tailings storage facility and identify if there are multiple dams (saddle or secondary dams) within that facility. Please provide details of these within question 20.

Excluded tailings dams include TSF which are in pit (e.g. below ground surface) and very low risk dams which were either small or fully encaspulated with mine material.

Glencore have listed all dams as separate line items within this table for full transparency purposes. Where a TSF contains numerous dams, the “Main” Dam is reported as bracketed. The Main Dam was selected based upon height, taking into account the importance of the structure with respect to TSF safety. The other dams are included for reference and tracking, although the level of detail of some them may be less complete, particularly if they are small dams.

2. Location Please provide Long/Lat coordinates. Coordinates are taken from Google Earth.

3. Ownership Please specify: Owned and Operated, Subsidiary, JV, NOJV, as of March 2019 1. “Owned and Operated” -- Glencore plc is a holding company and the reporting company for purposes of this document. Glencore plc does not own or operate any assets orsites, but is instead a holding company; accordingly, no TSFs described in this document have been designated as “owned and operated”;

2. Subsidiary” – subsidiary refers to any subsidiary that is directly or indirectly wholly-owned by Glencore, or very nearly wholly-owned by Glencore excluding immaterial equity interests (e.g., 99.99% ownership); all other assets or sites which have partners are listed as a JV or NOJV as applicable; provided however that with respect to Glencore’s ownership in Volcan Compania Minera S.A.A. (“Volcan”), Volcan is a publicly listed company in Peru and Glencore indirectly holds an ownership interest pursuant to which it exercises control through (a) approximately 55% of the outstanding voting rights in respect of Volcan on account of Glencore’s indirect ownership of voting shares issued by Volcan, and (b) appointment of a majority of the board of directors of Volcan, accordingly, all TSFs for mines which are owned and operated by Volcan are included in this document and are each designated as a “Subsidiary”; however, any TSFs which may be owned and operated by any publicly listed company in which Glencore is a minority shareholder and does not exercise control over the management and affairs of such publicly listed company are not included in this document;

3. “JV” – JV refers to any incorporated legal entity or unincorporated joint venture in which a subsidiary of Glencore has an ownership interest and which it controls and operates; and

4. “NOJV” – NOJV refers to any non-publicly listed incorporated legal entity or unincorporated joint venture in which a subsidiary of Glencore has an ownership interest but doesnot exercise control; for any TSF that is operated and managed by an NOJV, such TSF is operated and managed by (a) independent management appointed on behalf of the shareholders or joint venture partners, or (b) another shareholder or joint venture partner in the NOJV.

4. Status Please specify: Active, Inactive/Care and Maintenance, Closed etc. We take closed to mean: a closure plan was developed and approved by the relevant local government agency, and key stakeholders were involved in its development; a closed facility means the noted approved closure plan was fully implemented or the closure plan is in the process of being implemented. A facility that is inactive or under C&M is not considered closed until such time a closure plan has been implemented.

Active: operating TSFsIn-active: TSFs that are in care and maintenance and have not progressed to closure. This includes sites that are under care and maintenance with a reasonable expectation of reopening and sites which are being used to attenuate water flows for the TSF. This does not include closed sites where water treatment is required. Also includes TSFs under construction but not yet operational. Closed: TSFs that are either closed or progressing to closure. This includes closed sites where water treatment is required.

5.Date of initial operation (date) Glencore has provided dates with respect to the initial design/commissioning. For TSFs where the date is uncertain, an estimated date has been provided. In some cases, there also could be a discrepancy relating to reporting of the dates of: design, construction or commissioning, however, Glencore does not believe that this is a material discrepancy.

6. Is the Dam currently operated or closed as per currently approved design?

Yes/No. If 'No', more information can be provided in the answer to Q20 Two categories are being reported:Yes: TSFs that are operating within approved designs and design intent or dams that are under construction and not yet operational.No: TSF that are not operating within approved design or design intent.

7. Raising method Note: Upstream, Centerline, Modified Centreline, Downstream, Landform, Other. The predominant raising method is reported although some TSFs may have occasional raises with different methods (e.g., downstream raises, centerline raises, upstream raises and hybrid – combinations of different methods).

8. Current Maximum Height Note: Please disclose in metres The current maximum height of the Main Dam is reported.

9. Current Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume Note: (m3 as of March 2019) When available, the current volume of tailings deposited is reported. When not available, an estimated volume of tailings deposited has been calculated based on the area of the TSF and average height is reported.

10. Planned Tailings Storage Impoundment Volume in 5 years time (m3 as planned for January 2024) When available the planned volume is reported. When not available, an estimated volume based on the tailings production rate or other estimate has been made and reported.

11. Most Recent Independent Expert Review (date) For this question we take ‘Independent’ to mean a suitably qualified individual or team, external to the Operation, that does not direct the design or construction work for that facility.

No comment

12. Do you have full and complete relevant engineering records including design, construction, operation, maintenance, and/orclosure

(Yes or No) We take the word “relevant” here to mean that you have all necessary documents to make an informed and substantiated decision on the safety of the dam, be it an old facility, or an acquisition, or legacy site. More information can be provided in your answer to Q20.

Yes means that there is sufficient information to be able to make an assessment of the safety of the dam. For responses with No, please refer to dam response to question 20.

13. What is your hazard categorisation of this facility, based on the consequence of failure?

Hazard categorisation has been conducted according to the classification system provided in Q14

14. What guideline do you follow for the classification system? As provided.

Glencore plc


Explanatory Notes

Question Number / Description Disclosure Request Accompanying Notes Comment for the disclosure

15. Has this facility, at any point in its history, failed to be confirmedor certified as stable, or experienced notable stability concerns, as identified by an independent engineer (even if later certified as stable by the same or a different firm).

(Yes or No) We note that this will depend on factors including local legislation that are not necessarily tied to best practice. As such, and because remedial action may have been taken, a “Yes” answer may not indicate heightened risk.

Stability concerns might include toe seepage, dam movement, overtopping, spillway failure, piping etc. If yes, have appropriately designed and reviewed mitigation actions been implemented?

We also note that this question does not bear upon the appropriateness of the criteria, but rather the stewardship levels of the facility or the dam. Additional comments/information may be supplied in your answer to Q20.

Question 15 asks if any of our facilities have at any point in their history, failed to be confirmed or certified as stable, or experienced notable stability concerns, as identified by an independent engineer (even if later certified as stable by the same or a different firm). As this question can be open to interpretation we would like to clarify our approach and the context for our response.

To fulfil our understanding of the spirit of the question (i.e. are there any potential life threatening safety concerns within an existing facility that have been previously flagged but remain unaddressed, the following interpretation was used: • Not being certified/confirmed as stable is assumed to be where a noted deficiency is deemed sufficiently significant to trigger a catastrophic failure – the term deficiency is used in that context.• For operating facilities, this refers to any identified deficiency for the current life/stage. For a previous life/stage, any deficiency that was not addressed as vetted by an independent review.• For closed/legacy facilities, this refers to any deficiency identified that reflects the current state of the facility versus a previous issue that has been addressed through confirmed changed condition via the closure process.The above was used on the basis that we believe the disclosure effort is aimed at identifying tailings facilities that could potentially lead to a life-safety concerns, while avoiding falsely identifying issues for facilities that are decades old and no longer resemble the facility referred to in a former noted deficiency (i.e. the formerly noted deficiency is for a facility of nature that materially no longer exists). The approach was agreed with other members of the ICMM, who have also communicated this interpretation to the Investor Initiative.

By applying this interpretation, we have identified 17 TSFs. These are facilities with a risk of exposure downstream, where we have recognised we need to understand better the possible causes of failure such as extreme seismic events, even where they have not previously been considered (often because local legislation has not required it). In doing so, we have applied leading international standards that reflect the most current understanding of risks associated with TSF management (hence sometimes exceeding local regulations), and have identified those facilities where the application of this leading practice may identify a deficiency. We are assessing all of these facilities based on the severity of the risk profile, and are developing plans to address the areas of concern. Detailed planning work has already commenced in Mopani, and buttress construction is ongoing at Altyntau-Kojshetau, Zyranovsky and Talovsky, in Kazakhstan. We will provide updates on the plans for the remaining facilities once finalised.

16. Do you have internal/in house engineering specialist oversight of this facility? Or do you have external engineering support for this purpose?

Note: Answers may be "Both". The answer to the question is typically “both”. The in-house engineering specialist is a person responsible for TSF oversight and external engineering support is most often carried out for the design. External engineering support is also provided through the Glencore Corporate auditing process.


Note: Please answer 'yes' or 'no', and if 'yes', provide a date. Where the answer is "Yes" the assessment of the analysis of the downstream impacts has been carried out for the existing conditions based upon a semi-quantitative dam break analysis that considers both "sunny day" and "rainy day" dam failure modes and consideration of water/tailings flows and "mud flow" from potential tailings liquefaction flow. In some cases numerical dam break analyses have been carried out by the assets consultants. Glencore is developing a programme to classify consequence of failure for all assets to a common guidance, which at the time at the time of disclosure is CDA 2007 (2013).


Please answer both parts of this question (e.g. Yes and Yes) Glencore has a program to have closure plans for all assets which range from conceptual to detailed level. All closed facilities will include appropriate long term monitoring.

19. Have you, or do you plan to assess your tailings facilities against the impact of more regular extreme weather events as a result of climate change, e.g. over the next two years?

(Yes or No) Climate change results in both higher or lower precipitation and more variability. As part of ongoing Dam Safety Assessments (DSA) and review of meteorological data, the potential impact on the design basis for the tailings facilities will be reviewed on an on-going basis.

20. Any other relevant information and supporting documentation. Please state if you have omitted any other exposure to tailings facilities through any joint ventures you may have.

Note: this may include links to annual report disclosures, further information in the public domain, guidelines or reports etc.

Additional information


Disclaimer

Important notice concerning this document

This document and the information set forth herein has been prepared by Glencore in good faith in response to a request for disclosure received from the Church of England Pensions Board dated 5 April 2019. The information requested by the Church of England Pensions Board was extensive in scope and depth, and necessarily involved the collection and assessment of a considerable volume of historical business records and data maintained by Glencore and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The review and assessment of such historical business records and data and the preparation of this document and the information contained herein necessarily involved the exercise of subjective professional judgment in making evaluations and assessments and interpreting the relevant information and data for such purposes, including as to the historical, current and future assessments of the status and structural integrity of the TSFs which are described in this document.

This document and the information set forth therein should be read in conjunction with other public disclosure of Glencore, including its most recent Annual Report, which is available on its website, and the Principal Risks and Uncertainties set out therein.

The information disclosed in respect of certain non-operated joint ventures has been provided to Glencore by the relevant companies and has not been independently verified by Glencore.

Except as required by applicable regulations or by applicable law, Glencore is not under any obligation and Glencore and each of its subsidiaries and affiliates expressly disclaim any intention, obligation, undertaking or duty of care, to update or revise any information, including forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, in this document; provided however, that notwithstanding the foregoing, Glencore reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to correct any information in this document which it subsequently determines is inaccurate or incorrect in any material respect. This document shall not, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the current status or structural integrity of any of the TSFs as described in this document after the date of this document, or that the information contained herein (or any part thereof) is correct as at any time subsequent to the date of this document.

The companies in which Glencore plc directly and indirectly has an interest are separate and distinct legal entities. In this document, “Glencore”, “Glencore group” and “Group” are used for convenience only where references are made to Glencore plc and its subsidiaries in general. These collective expressions are used for ease of reference only and do not imply any other relationship between the companies. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer collectively to members of the Group or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies.

For the avoidance of doubt, this document is not a prospectus or part of a prospectus or other disclosure document that is required to be lodged or filed with any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. Accordingly, this document does not purport to contain all the information that may be necessary or desirable to enable any recipient to properly evaluate and consider the information and matters set forth therein and/or to make any investment decision. This document has not been lodged or filed with any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. This document does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to sell or issue, or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for any securities.

In this regard, this document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward looking statements” which are prospective in nature. These forward looking statements may be identified by the use of forward looking terminology, or the negative thereof such as “outlook”, "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "continues", "assumes", "is subject to", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "aims", "forecasts", "risks", "intends", "positioned", "predicts", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words or comparable terminology and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "should", “shall”, "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather on current predictions, expectations, beliefs, opinions, plans, objectives, goals, intentions and projections about future events, results of operations, prospects, financial condition and discussions of strategy.

By their nature, forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Glencore’s control. Forward looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and may and often do differ materially from actual results. Important factors that could cause these uncertainties include, but are not limited to, unforeseen extreme weather events, unforeseen seismic events, or other unforeseen natural phenomena such as hurricanes, cyclones, storms, floods, earthquakes, fires, landslides or other events, or other events or factors which are entirely beyond Glencore’s control. Such events and factors could adversely affect the current status and structural integrity of the TSFs which are described in this document.

Neither Glencore nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, nor any of its or their respective associates or directors, officers, employees, agents or advisers, provides any representation, assurance or guarantee that the occurrence (or non-occurrence) of the events expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements in this document will actually occur. You are cautioned not to place any reliance on any of these forward-looking statements which only speak as of the date of this document.

Tailings Storage Facilities Table58e3d8ff-97c1-422... · 6/14/2019 · West Wallsend, Australia,...

Documents

Transcript of Tailings Storage Facilities Table58e3d8ff-97c1-422... · 6/14/2019 · West Wallsend, Australia,...