TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical...

23
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Level 3 exemplar Paper 1 ................................................................................................................................ 2 Paper 2, Christianity ............................................................................................................ 15

Transcript of TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical...

Page 1: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Level 3 exemplar

Paper 1 ................................................................................................................................ 2

Paper 2, Christianity ............................................................................................................ 15

Page 2: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

2

Level 3 exemplar

Paper 1

Page 3: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

3

Page 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

4

Page 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

5

Page 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

6

Page 7: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

7

Page 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

8

Page 9: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

9

Page 10: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

10

Page 11: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

11

Page 12: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

12

Page 13: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

13

Page 14: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

14

Page 15: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

15

Level 3 exemplar

Paper 2, Christianity

Page 16: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

16

Page 17: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

17

Page 18: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

18

Page 19: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

19

Page 20: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

20

Page 21: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

21

Page 22: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

22

Page 23: TABLE OF CONTENTS · details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation. The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated.

23

Comments

Paper 1

Short Questions

The candidate’s performance in Question 1 is far better than that in Questions 2, 3 and 4. The answers to the

last three questions are not clearly explained and the discussions are not closely related to the main ideas of

the questions.

Essay Questions

The answers to Questions 5 and 7 are generally good. For Question 5, it is fine to present a general

introduction in the answer as long as it is well integrated with the discussion that follows. Repetition of the

details of the question is useful only if it is well supported with logical elaboration and critical evaluation.

The last part of the answer is not clearly elaborated. For Question 7, it is fine that general perspectives of

normative ethics are used in the analysis of the case. It would have been even better if the answer included

some more discussions on relevant theories and concepts like anthropocentrism and sustainable development.

Paper 2 (Christianity)

The candidate’s performance in Questions 7, 8 and 10 is generally fair. The answers in general reflect

adequate knowledge on the related topics; like: Jesus’ resurrection, the Exile and Jesus’ miracles, though the

elaborations may not be entirely correct at some points (e.g. The Israelites did not believe in God after the

Exile).