Advanced Machining Processes - Unconventional Machining Processes
TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II Mechanics of Machining
Transcript of TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II Mechanics of Machining
TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II
Mechanics of Machining
Lecture 4
Niraj Sinha
Department of Mechanical Engineering
IIT Kanpur
Machining Processes
2
Example part to be made on a mill-turn center
Sequence of operations
Process Planning For A Component
3
Most machining operations are geometrically complex and 3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoVQAn7Suto
Machining Processes
Mechanics of Cutting
4
Simple 2D orthogonal cutting can help explain the general mechanics of metal removal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRuSYQ5Npek&t=21s
Work Material Cutting Tool Machining Conditions
Machine Tool
Cutting Process
Product
Measurements
Determinations
Metal type Purity BCC, FCC, HCP Predeformation(work hardening prior to machining)
Machining Conditions
Cutting parameters β’ Depth of cut β’ Speed β’ Feed
Environment β’ Lubricant
(cutting fluid) β’ Oxygen β’ Temperature
Workholderβ’ Fixtures β’ Jigs β’ Chucks β’ Collets
Cutting speed (v) β primary motion
The speed at which the work moves with respect to the tool
Feed (f) β secondary motion
Depth of cut (d) β penetration of tool below original work surface
Machining Conditions in Turning
Feed Rate - fr
f = feed per rev
Depth of Cut - d
Machining Time - Tm
L = length of cut
Material Removal Rate - MRRoDΟ
vN
Spindle Speed - N
v = cutting speed
Do = outer diameter
fNf r
2fo DD
d
r
mf
LT
dfvM R R
Selecting Depth of Cut
Depth of cut is often predetermined by workpiece
geometry and operation sequence
β In roughing, depth is made as large as possible to maximize
material removal rate, subject to limitations of
horsepower, machine tool and setup rigidity, and strength
of cutting tool
β In finishing, depth is set to achieve final part dimensions
Determining Feed
β’ In general: feed first, speed second
β’ Determining feed rate depends on:
β Tooling β harder tool materials require lower feeds
β Roughing or finishing - Roughing means high feeds,
finishing means low feeds
β Constraints on feed in roughing - Limits imposed by cutting
forces, setup rigidity, and sometimes horsepower
β Surface finish requirements in finishing β select feed to
produce desired finish
Optimizing Cutting Speed
β’ Select speed to achieve a balance between high
metal removal rate and suitably long tool life
β’ Mathematical formulas are available to determine
optimal speed
β’ Two alternative objectives in these formulas:
1. Maximum production rate
2. Minimum unit cost
Maximum Production Rate
β’ Maximizing production rate = minimizing cutting time per unit
β’ In turning, total production cycle time for one part consists of:
1. Part handling time per part = Th
2. Machining time per part = Tm
3. Tool change time per part = Tt/np , where np = number of pieces cut in one tool life
Total time per unit product for operation:
Tc = Th + Tm + Tt/np
Cycle time Tc is a function of cutting speed
Minimizing Cost per Unit
In turning, total production cycle cost for one part consists of:
1. Cost of part handling time = CoTh , where Co = cost rate for operator and machine
2. Cost of machining time = CoTm
3. Cost of tool change time = CoTt/np
4. Tooling cost = Ct/np , where Ct = cost per cutting edge
Total cost per unit product for operation:
Cc = CoTh + CoTm + CoTt/np + Ct/np
Again, unit cost is a function of cutting speed, just as Tc is a function of v
Cutting Fluids
Any liquid or gas applied directly to machining operation to
improve cutting performance
β’ Two main problems addressed by cutting fluids:
1. Heat generation at shear zone and friction zone
2. Friction at the tool-chip and tool-work interfaces
β’ Other functions and benefits:
β Wash away chips (e.g., grinding and milling)
β Reduce temperature of workpart for easier handling
β Improve dimensional stability of workpart
Cutting Fluid Functions
Cutting fluids can be classified according to function:
β Coolants - designed to reduce effects of heat in machining
β Lubricants - designed to reduce tool-chip and tool-work friction
β’ Water used as base in coolant-type cutting fluids
β’ Most effective at high cutting speeds where heat generation and high
temperatures are problems
β’ Most effective on tool materials that are most susceptible to
temperature failures (e.g., HSS)
β’ Usually oil-based fluids
β’ Most effective at lower cutting speeds
β’ Also reduces temperature in the operation
Coolants
Lubricants
Work Material Cutting Tool Machining Conditions
Machine Tool
Cutting Process
Product
Measurements
Determinations
Cutting Tool Classification
1. Single-Point Toolsβ One dominant cutting edge
β Point is usually rounded to form a nose radius
β Turning uses single point tools
2. Multiple Cutting Edge Toolsβ More than one cutting edge
β Motion relative to work achieved by rotating
β Drilling and milling use rotating multiple cutting edge tools
Figure: (a) Seven elements of single-point tool geometry; and (b) the tool
signature convention that defines the seven elements
Single-Point Tool Geometry
Tool MaterialsTool failure modes identify the important properties that a tool material should possess:
β Toughness - to avoid fracture failure
β Hot hardness - ability to retain hardness at high temperatures
β Wear resistance - hardness is the most important property to resist abrasive wear
High speed steel (HSS) Cemented carbides Cermets Coated carbides Ceramics Synthetic diamonds Cubic boron nitride
Failure of Cutting Tools and Tool Wear
β’ Fracture failure
β Cutting force becomes excessive and/or dynamic, leading to brittle fracture
β’ Temperature failure
β Cutting temperature is too high for the tool material
β’ Gradual wear
β Gradual wearing of the cutting tool
Preferred Mode of Tool Failure: Gradual
Wear
β’ Fracture and temperature failures are premature failures
β’ Gradual wear is preferred because it leads to the longest possible use of the tool
β’ Gradual wear occurs at two locations on a tool:
β Crater wear β occurs on top rake face
β Flank wear β occurs on flank (side of tool)
Figure -
(a) Crater wear, and
(b) flank wear on a cemented carbide tool, as seen through a toolmaker's microscope
(Source: Manufacturing Technology Laboratory, Lehigh University, photo by J. C. Keefe)
Figure - Tool wear as a function of cutting time
Flank wear (FW) is used here as the measure of tool wear
Crater wear follows a similar growth curve
Figure - Effect of cutting speed on tool flank wear (FW) for three cutting speeds, using a tool life criterion of 0.50 mm flank wear
Taylor Tool Life Equation
This relationship is credited to F. W. Taylor (~1900)
CvT n
where v = cutting speed; T = tool life; and n and C are parameters that
depend on feed, depth of cut, work material, tooling material, and the
tool life criterion used
β’ n is the slope of the plot
β’ C is the intercept on the speed axis
Variables Affecting Tool Life
Cutting conditions.
Tool geometry.
Tool material.
Work material.
Cutting fluid.
Vibration behavior of the machine-tool work system.
Built-up edge.
Work Material Cutting Tool Machining Conditions
Machine Tool
Cutting Process
Product
Measurements
Determinations
Cutting Process: Chip Formation
β’ More realistic view of chip formation, showing shear zone rather than shear plane
β’ Also shown is the secondary shear zone resulting from tool-chip friction
Four Basic Types of Chip in Machining
1. Discontinuous chip
2. Continuous chip
3. Continuous chip with Built-up Edge (BUE)
4. Serrated chip
β’ Brittle work materials
β’ Low cutting speeds
β’ Large feed and depth of cut
β’ High tool-chip friction
Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Volume 49, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 240β247
Discontinuous Chip
β’ Ductile work materials
β’ High cutting speeds
β’ Small feeds and depths
β’ Sharp cutting edge
β’ Low tool-chip friction
Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 121, Issues 2β3, 28 February 2002, Pages 363β372
Continuous Chip
β’ Ductile materials
β’ Low-to-medium cutting speeds
β’ Tool-chip friction causes portions of chip to adhere to rake face
β’ BUE forms, then breaks off, cyclically
Springerimages.com
Continuous with BUE
β’ Semi-continuous - saw-tooth appearance
β’ Cyclical chip forms with alternating high shear strain then low shear strain
β’ Associated with difficult-to-machine metals at high cutting speeds
Springerimages.com
Serrated Chip
Roughing vs. Finishing Cuts
For increasing the production, several roughing cuts
are usually taken on a part, followed by one or two
finishing cuts
β Roughing - removes large amounts of material from
starting workpart
β’ Some material remains for finish cutting
β’ High feeds and depths, low speeds
β Finishing - completes part geometry
β’ Final dimensions, tolerances, and finish
β’ Low feeds and depths, high cutting speeds
Orthogonal Cutting Geometry
73
Assumptions:1. Cutting edge is perfectly sharp2. Uncut chip thickness is constant
and << than width3. Width of tool > width of
workpiece4. Continuous chip with no built up-
edge5. Uniform cutting along edge6. 2D plane strain deformation7. No side spreading of material8. Uniform stress distribution on
shear plane9. Forces primarily in directions of
velocity and uncut chip thickness
Orthogonal Cutting Geometry
74
Primary shear zone:Material ahead of tool is sheared to form a chip
Secondary shear zone:Sheared material (chip) partially deforms and moves along the rake face
Tertiary zone:Flank of tool rubs the newly machined surface
Simple 2D orthogonal cutting can help explain the general mechanics of metal removal
Tool
Workpiece
Chip
Primary Shearing Zone
75
πΉπ‘π
πΉππ
πΉπ
πΉπ
πΉπ£
β π
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π cosππ β πΉππ sinππ ;
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π sin ππ + πΉππ cosππ ;πΉπ πΉπ
=cosππ βsinππ
sin ππ cosππ
πΉπ‘ππΉππ
Force components in primary shear zone
πΉπ’
πΌπ πΌπ- rake angle; ππ - shear angleπΉπ‘π - tangential force/cutting force;πΉππ - feed force/thrust force
πΉπ - force acting along the shear planeπΉπ - normal force acting on the shear planeπΉπ£ - force acting on the rake faceπΉπ’ - frictional force
β’ Forces acting on the tool that can be measured: Cutting force Ftc and Thrust force Ffc
β’ Other forces cannot be directly measured
Chip ratios β basic characteristics
76
sinππ =β
ππ
β
βπ
β π
πΌπ
β π β πΌπ
ππ
cos ππ β πΌπ =βπππ
β = ππsinππ βπ = ππcos ππ β πΌπ
ππ =β
βπ=
sinππ
cos ππ β πΌπ
&
&
Chip thickness ratio
From mass (volume flow rate) conservation, chip thickness ratio β chip length ratio
ππ =β
βπ=πππ= ππ No side spreading assumption, ππ€ = 1
ππ = tanβ1ππ cos πΌπ
1 β ππsin πΌπ
Velocity Relations
80
ππ = πcos πΌπ
cos ππ β πΌπ
ππ
π
ππ
ππ ππ
π
πΌπ
ππ
ππ β πΌπ
πΌπ
ππ
ππ β πΌπChip velocity, ππ (acknowledging conservation of volume-flow rate):
πππ=ππ/βπ‘
π/βπ‘= ππ β ππ = πππ
ππ = ππ =sinππ
cos ππ β πΌπ
ππ =sinππ
cos ππ β πΌππ
Shear velocity, ππ is vector sum of ππ and π
Shear Strain and Material Movement
81
Undeformed chip section π΄0π΅ππ΄1π΅1moves with velocity π
When one element traverses the shear plane in time βπ‘:
point π΄1 moves to point π΄2, point π΄0 moves to point π΄1
point π΅1 moves to point π΅2, point π΅0 moves to point π΅1
Undeformed chip section π΄0π΅ππ΄1π΅1hence becomes deformed chip with section π΄1π΅1π΄2π΅2
Hence chip is shifted from expected position of π΅2β² π΄2
β² to π΅2π΄2 because of shearing
Shear Strain and Shear Strain Rate
82
βπ₯
π¦
πΎ
tan πΎ =βπ₯
π¦πΎ =
βπ₯
π¦πΎ =
βπ
βπ=π΄2π΄2
β²
π΄1πΆ=π΄2
β²πΆ
π΄1πΆ+πΆπ΄2π΄1πΆ
= cotππ + tan ππ β πΌπSmallangles
Shear strain rate
αΆπΎ =πΎ
βπ‘
Assuming shear zone increment is βπ and the thickness of the shear deformation zone is βπ
πΎ =βπ
βπππ =
βπ
βπ‘αΆπΎ =
ππ βπ
= πcosπΌπ
βπ cos ππ β πΌπ
βπ β 0 β thin shear plane β very large strain rates
84
Assuming uniform shear stress distribution on the shear plane and that all shear plane material is plastically shearing
ππ =πΉπ π΄π
π΄π = πβ
sinππ
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π cosππ β πΉππ sinππ
π΄π - shear plane areaπ β width of cut (depth of cut in turning)β - uncut chip thickness ππ - shear angleπΉπ - force acting along the shear planeπΉπ - normal force acting on the shear plane
Normal stress on the shear plane
ππ =πΉππ΄π
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π sinππ + πΉππ cosππ
Primary Shearing Zone
Orthogonal Cutting Geometry
85
Primary shear zone:Material ahead of tool is sheared to form a chip
Secondary shear zone:Sheared material (chip) partially deforms and moves along the rake face
Tertiary zone:Flank of tool rubs the newly machined surface
Secondary Shear Zone
86
πΉπ£ = πΉπ‘π cosπΌπ β πΉππ sin πΌπ ;
πΉπ’ = πΉπ‘π sin πΌπ + πΉππ cos πΌπ ;πΉπ£πΉπ’
=cosπΌπ βsin πΌπsin πΌπ cos πΌπ
πΉπ‘ππΉππ
Force components in secondary shear zone
ππ = tanπ½π =πΉπ’πΉπ£
Average friction coeff on rake face:
Force Circle Diagram
87
Tool
πΉπ‘π
πΉππ
πΉπ
πΉπ
πΉπ£
β π
πΉπ’
πΌπβ ππΉπ
π½π β πΌπ
πΌπ
π½π β πΌπ π½π
88
Tool
πΉπ‘π
πΉππ
πΉπ
πΉπ
πΉπ£
β π
πΉπ’
πΌπβ π
π½π β πΌπ
πΌπ
π½π β πΌπ π½π
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π cosππ β πΉππ sinππ ;
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π sinππ + πΉππ cosππ ;
Force components in primary shear zone
Force components in primary shear zoneusing the force circle diagram
πΉπ = πΉπ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ ;πΉπ = πΉπ sin ππ + π½π β πΌπ ;
πΉπ
Force components in secondary shear zone using the force circle diagram
πΉπ£ =? ; πΉπ’ =?
Force Circle Diagram
Total Power Consumed in Cutting
89
ππ‘π = ππ + ππ’
ππ‘π = πΉπ ππ + πΉπ’ππ
ππ = πcos πΌπ
cos ππ β πΌπ
Total power consumed in cutting is sum of energy spent in shear and friction zones
πΉπ’ = πΉπ‘π sin πΌπ + πΉππ cos πΌππΉπ = πΉπ‘π cosππ β πΉππ sin ππ
ππ - shear angle?πΉπ - force acting along the shear plane?πΉπ’ - frictional force?
ππ = πsinππ
cos ππ β πΌπ
Force Prediction for Power Consumption
90
ππ‘π = πΉπ ππ + πΉπ’ππ
πΉπ = πΉπ‘π cosππ β πΉππ sinππ πΉπ = πΉπ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ
πΉπ = ππ π΄π = ππ πβ
sin ππ
Total power consumed in cutting is sum of energy spent in shear and friction zones
Primary chip generation mechanism is shearing
ππ = πΉπ ππ
ππ = πcos πΌπ
cos ππ β πΌπ
Shear force can also be expressed as
Resultant cutting force can be now be expressed in terms of shear stress, friction and shear angles, width of cut, and feed rate as follows:
πΉπ =πΉπ
cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ= ππ πβ
1
sinππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπKnow everything but for ππ
91
Resultant cutting force can be now be expressed in terms of shear stress, friction and shear angles, width of cut, and feed rate as follows:
πΉπ =πΉπ
cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ= ππ πβ
1
sinππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ
Nature always takes the path of least resistance, so during cutting ππ takes a value such that least amount of energy is consumed, i.e. since ππ , π, β, and π½π and πΌπ are given and do not
change, power consumed becomes:
πΉπ‘π = πΉπ cos π½π β πΌπ = ππ πβcos π½π β πΌπ
sinππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ
ππ‘π = ππΉπ‘π
Recalling the FCD
Power consumed during cutting:
ππ‘π ππ =ππππ π‘πππ‘
sin ππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ
Shear Angle β from Merchantβs Energy Principle
Shear Angle β from Merchantβs Energy Principle
92
Nature always takes the path of least resistance, so during cutting , ππ takes a value such that least amount of energy is consumed, i.e. since ππ , π, β, and π½π and πΌπ are given and do not
change, power consumed becomes:
ππ‘π ππ =ππππ π‘πππ‘
sinππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ
ππ‘π ππ will be a minimum when the denominator is a maximum, hence differentiate denominator w.r.t ππ and equate it to zero:
cosππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπ β sinππ sin ππ + π½π β πΌπ = 0
cos 2ππ + π½π β πΌπ = 0
2ππ + π½π β πΌπ =π
2 ππ =π
4βπ½π β πΌπ
2
Force Prediction
93
πΉπ‘π = πΉπ cos π½π β πΌπ = ππ πβcos π½π β πΌπ
sinππ cos ππ + π½π β πΌπππ‘π = ππΉπ‘π
ππ =π
4βπ½π β πΌπ
2
Shear angle using Merchantβs minimum energy principle
Force prediction Power consumed
β’ Shear angle prediction with these and other such models are not very accurate
β’ However, they provide important relationships between tool geometry and shear
angle β which is important for tool design
β’ To increase shear plane angle β Increase the rake angle β Reduce the friction angle (or reduce the coefficient of friction)
β’ Higher shear plane angle means smaller shear plane which means lower shear force, cutting forces, power, and temperature
94
β’ Contact mechanics between flank face and finished surface depends on
tool wear, preparation of cutting edge and friction characteristics of tool
and workpiece
β’ Assume total friction force on flank face is πΉππ
β’ And force normal to flank face in πΉππ
β’ Assume pressure (ππ) on the flank face to be uniform (a gross
oversimplification)
πΉππ
πΉππ
πΎπ
Tertiary Deformation Zone
Tertiary Deformation Zone
95
πΉπ‘π = πΉππ sin πΎπ + πΉππ cos πΎπ ;
πΉππ = πΉππ cos πΎπ + πΉππ sin πΎπ;
πΉππ = ππππ΅π
ππ΅
πΎπ
ππ = πΉππ/πΉππ
Normal force on the flank face
Because the tool rubs on the finished surface, there is friction
Resolving contact forces into tangentialand feed directions
Any measured forces will include forces due to shearing and tothe tertiary deformation process, i.e. rubbing/ploughing at theflank of the cutting edge
πΉπ‘ = πΉπ‘π + πΉπ‘π;πΉπ = πΉππ + πΉππ;
All cutting force expressions presented up until now were only for shearing, but in reality, edge forces also exist, hence edge forces must be subtracted from measured tangential and feed
forces before applying laws of orthogonal cutting mechanics
Orthogonal and Oblique Cutting Geometry
96
Cutting velocity is inclined at an acute angle π to the cutting edge
Cutting velocity is perpendicular to cutting edge
Altintas, Mfg. Automation
Prediction of cutting forces in oblique cutting
97
πΉπ‘ = πΎπ‘ππβ + πΎπ‘ππ;πΉπ = πΎπππβ + πΎπππ;
πΉπ = πΎπππβ + πΎπππ;
πΎπ‘π =ππ cos ππ + tan ππ tan π
cos ππ + ππ cos ππ + tan ππ sinππ sinππ
πΎππ =ππ sin ππ
cos ππ + ππ cos ππ + tan ππ sinππ sinππ
πΎππ =ππ πβ tan ππ β cos ππ tan π
cos ππ + ππ cos ππ + tan ππ sinππ sin ππ
πΉππ =ππ πβ tan ππ β cos ππ tan π
cos ππ + ππ cos ππ + tan ππ sinππ sinππ
πΉπ‘π =ππ πβ cos ππ + tan ππ tan π
cos ππ + ππ cos ππ + tan ππ sinππ sinπππΉππ =
ππ πβ sin ππcos ππ + ππ cos ππ + tan ππ sinππ sinππ
Force in direction of cutting speed
Expressing force components as a π ππ , ππ, ππ , ππ, ππ :
Force in direction of thrust
Force in direction of normal
Rewriting forces in the convenient form of:
Cutting Temperature
β’ Approximately 98% of the energy in machining is
converted into heat
β’ This can cause temperatures to be very high at the
tool-chip
β’ The remaining energy (about 2%) is retained as
elastic energy in the chip
Cutting Temperatures are Important
High cutting temperatures
1. reduce tool life
2. produce hot chips that pose safety hazards to the
machine operator
3. can cause inaccuracies in part dimensions due to
thermal expansion of work material
Cutting Temperature
Analytical method derived by Nathan Cook from dimensional analysis using experimental data for various work materials
where T = temperature rise at tool-chip interface; U = specific energy;v = cutting speed; to = chip thickness before cut; C = volumetricspecific heat of work material; K = thermal diffusivity of work material
333040
..
K
vt
C
UT o
β’ Experimental methods can be used to measure
temperatures in machining
β Most frequently used technique is the tool-chip
thermocouple
β’ Using this method, Ken Trigger determined the
speed-temperature relationship to be of the form:
T = K vm
where T = measured tool-chip interface temperature,
and v = cutting speed
Cutting Temperature
Example
Consider a turning operation performed on steel whose hardness = 225 HB at a speed = 3.0 m/s, feed = 0.25 mm, and depth = 4.0 mm. Using values of thermal properties and the appropriate specific energy value from tables, compute an estimate of cutting temperature using the Cook equation. Assume ambient temperature = 20C.
Solution: From Table, U = 2.2 N-m/mm3 = 2.2 J/mm3
From Table, = 7.87 g/cm3 = 7.87(10-3) g/mm3
From Table, C = 0.11 Cal/g-C. From note βaβ at the bottom of the table, 1 cal = 4.186 J.
From Table, thermal conductivity k = 0.046 J/s-mm-C
Thus, C = 0.11(4.186) = 0.460 J/ g-C
C = (7.87 g/cm3)(0.46 J/g-C) = 3.62(10-3) J/mm3-C
Also, thermal diffusivity K = k/C
K = 0.046 J/s-mm-C /[(7.87 x 10-3 g/mm3)(0.46 J/g-C)] = 12.7 mm2/s
Using Cookβs equation, to = f = 0.25 mm
T = (0.4(2.2)/3.62(10-3))[3(103)(0.25)/12.7]0.333 = 0.2428(103)(59.06)0.333
= 242.8(3.89) = 944.4 C
Final temperature, taking ambient temperature in account T = 20 + 944 = 964C