TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II Mechanics of Machining

66
TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II Mechanics of Machining Lecture 4 Niraj Sinha Department of Mechanical Engineering IIT Kanpur [email protected]

Transcript of TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II Mechanics of Machining

TA202A - Manufacturing Processes II

Mechanics of Machining

Lecture 4

Niraj Sinha

Department of Mechanical Engineering

IIT Kanpur

[email protected]

Machining Processes

2

Example part to be made on a mill-turn center

Sequence of operations

Process Planning For A Component

3

Most machining operations are geometrically complex and 3D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoVQAn7Suto

Machining Processes

Mechanics of Cutting

4

Simple 2D orthogonal cutting can help explain the general mechanics of metal removal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRuSYQ5Npek&t=21s

Tensile Testing

5

@ ACMS, IITK

Milling

MachiningParameters

Work Material Cutting Tool Machining Conditions

Machine Tool

Cutting Process

Product

Measurements

Determinations

Metal type Purity BCC, FCC, HCP Predeformation(work hardening prior to machining)

Machining Conditions

Cutting parameters β€’ Depth of cut β€’ Speed β€’ Feed

Environment β€’ Lubricant

(cutting fluid) β€’ Oxygen β€’ Temperature

Workholderβ€’ Fixtures β€’ Jigs β€’ Chucks β€’ Collets

Cutting speed (v) – primary motion

The speed at which the work moves with respect to the tool

Feed (f) – secondary motion

Depth of cut (d) – penetration of tool below original work surface

Machining Conditions in Turning

Feed Rate - fr

f = feed per rev

Depth of Cut - d

Machining Time - Tm

L = length of cut

Material Removal Rate - MRRoDΟ€

vN

Spindle Speed - N

v = cutting speed

Do = outer diameter

fNf r

2fo DD

d

r

mf

LT

dfvM R R

Selecting Depth of Cut

Depth of cut is often predetermined by workpiece

geometry and operation sequence

– In roughing, depth is made as large as possible to maximize

material removal rate, subject to limitations of

horsepower, machine tool and setup rigidity, and strength

of cutting tool

– In finishing, depth is set to achieve final part dimensions

Determining Feed

β€’ In general: feed first, speed second

β€’ Determining feed rate depends on:

– Tooling – harder tool materials require lower feeds

– Roughing or finishing - Roughing means high feeds,

finishing means low feeds

– Constraints on feed in roughing - Limits imposed by cutting

forces, setup rigidity, and sometimes horsepower

– Surface finish requirements in finishing – select feed to

produce desired finish

Optimizing Cutting Speed

β€’ Select speed to achieve a balance between high

metal removal rate and suitably long tool life

β€’ Mathematical formulas are available to determine

optimal speed

β€’ Two alternative objectives in these formulas:

1. Maximum production rate

2. Minimum unit cost

Maximum Production Rate

β€’ Maximizing production rate = minimizing cutting time per unit

β€’ In turning, total production cycle time for one part consists of:

1. Part handling time per part = Th

2. Machining time per part = Tm

3. Tool change time per part = Tt/np , where np = number of pieces cut in one tool life

Total time per unit product for operation:

Tc = Th + Tm + Tt/np

Cycle time Tc is a function of cutting speed

Cycle Time vs. Cutting Speed

Minimizing Cost per Unit

In turning, total production cycle cost for one part consists of:

1. Cost of part handling time = CoTh , where Co = cost rate for operator and machine

2. Cost of machining time = CoTm

3. Cost of tool change time = CoTt/np

4. Tooling cost = Ct/np , where Ct = cost per cutting edge

Total cost per unit product for operation:

Cc = CoTh + CoTm + CoTt/np + Ct/np

Again, unit cost is a function of cutting speed, just as Tc is a function of v

Unit Cost vs. Cutting Speed

Cutting Fluids

Any liquid or gas applied directly to machining operation to

improve cutting performance

β€’ Two main problems addressed by cutting fluids:

1. Heat generation at shear zone and friction zone

2. Friction at the tool-chip and tool-work interfaces

β€’ Other functions and benefits:

– Wash away chips (e.g., grinding and milling)

– Reduce temperature of workpart for easier handling

– Improve dimensional stability of workpart

Cutting Fluid Functions

Cutting fluids can be classified according to function:

– Coolants - designed to reduce effects of heat in machining

– Lubricants - designed to reduce tool-chip and tool-work friction

β€’ Water used as base in coolant-type cutting fluids

β€’ Most effective at high cutting speeds where heat generation and high

temperatures are problems

β€’ Most effective on tool materials that are most susceptible to

temperature failures (e.g., HSS)

β€’ Usually oil-based fluids

β€’ Most effective at lower cutting speeds

β€’ Also reduces temperature in the operation

Coolants

Lubricants

Work Material Cutting Tool Machining Conditions

Machine Tool

Cutting Process

Product

Measurements

Determinations

Cutting Tool Classification

1. Single-Point Tools– One dominant cutting edge

– Point is usually rounded to form a nose radius

– Turning uses single point tools

2. Multiple Cutting Edge Tools– More than one cutting edge

– Motion relative to work achieved by rotating

– Drilling and milling use rotating multiple cutting edge tools

Figure: (a) Seven elements of single-point tool geometry; and (b) the tool

signature convention that defines the seven elements

Single-Point Tool Geometry

Tool MaterialsTool failure modes identify the important properties that a tool material should possess:

– Toughness - to avoid fracture failure

– Hot hardness - ability to retain hardness at high temperatures

– Wear resistance - hardness is the most important property to resist abrasive wear

High speed steel (HSS) Cemented carbides Cermets Coated carbides Ceramics Synthetic diamonds Cubic boron nitride

Failure of Cutting Tools and Tool Wear

β€’ Fracture failure

– Cutting force becomes excessive and/or dynamic, leading to brittle fracture

β€’ Temperature failure

– Cutting temperature is too high for the tool material

β€’ Gradual wear

– Gradual wearing of the cutting tool

Preferred Mode of Tool Failure: Gradual

Wear

β€’ Fracture and temperature failures are premature failures

β€’ Gradual wear is preferred because it leads to the longest possible use of the tool

β€’ Gradual wear occurs at two locations on a tool:

– Crater wear – occurs on top rake face

– Flank wear – occurs on flank (side of tool)

Figure - Diagram of worn cutting tool, showing the principal

locations and types of wear that occur

Figure -

(a) Crater wear, and

(b) flank wear on a cemented carbide tool, as seen through a toolmaker's microscope

(Source: Manufacturing Technology Laboratory, Lehigh University, photo by J. C. Keefe)

Figure - Tool wear as a function of cutting time

Flank wear (FW) is used here as the measure of tool wear

Crater wear follows a similar growth curve

Figure - Effect of cutting speed on tool flank wear (FW) for three cutting speeds, using a tool life criterion of 0.50 mm flank wear

Figure - Natural log-log plot of cutting speed vs tool life

Taylor Tool Life Equation

This relationship is credited to F. W. Taylor (~1900)

CvT n

where v = cutting speed; T = tool life; and n and C are parameters that

depend on feed, depth of cut, work material, tooling material, and the

tool life criterion used

β€’ n is the slope of the plot

β€’ C is the intercept on the speed axis

Variables Affecting Tool Life

Cutting conditions.

Tool geometry.

Tool material.

Work material.

Cutting fluid.

Vibration behavior of the machine-tool work system.

Built-up edge.

Work Material Cutting Tool Machining Conditions

Machine Tool

Cutting Process

Product

Measurements

Determinations

Cutting Process: Chip Formation

β€’ More realistic view of chip formation, showing shear zone rather than shear plane

β€’ Also shown is the secondary shear zone resulting from tool-chip friction

Four Basic Types of Chip in Machining

1. Discontinuous chip

2. Continuous chip

3. Continuous chip with Built-up Edge (BUE)

4. Serrated chip

β€’ Brittle work materials

β€’ Low cutting speeds

β€’ Large feed and depth of cut

β€’ High tool-chip friction

Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Volume 49, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 240–247

Discontinuous Chip

β€’ Ductile work materials

β€’ High cutting speeds

β€’ Small feeds and depths

β€’ Sharp cutting edge

β€’ Low tool-chip friction

Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 121, Issues 2–3, 28 February 2002, Pages 363–372

Continuous Chip

β€’ Ductile materials

β€’ Low-to-medium cutting speeds

β€’ Tool-chip friction causes portions of chip to adhere to rake face

β€’ BUE forms, then breaks off, cyclically

Springerimages.com

Continuous with BUE

β€’ Semi-continuous - saw-tooth appearance

β€’ Cyclical chip forms with alternating high shear strain then low shear strain

β€’ Associated with difficult-to-machine metals at high cutting speeds

Springerimages.com

Serrated Chip

Roughing vs. Finishing Cuts

For increasing the production, several roughing cuts

are usually taken on a part, followed by one or two

finishing cuts

– Roughing - removes large amounts of material from

starting workpart

β€’ Some material remains for finish cutting

β€’ High feeds and depths, low speeds

– Finishing - completes part geometry

β€’ Final dimensions, tolerances, and finish

β€’ Low feeds and depths, high cutting speeds

Orthogonal Cutting Geometry

73

Assumptions:1. Cutting edge is perfectly sharp2. Uncut chip thickness is constant

and << than width3. Width of tool > width of

workpiece4. Continuous chip with no built up-

edge5. Uniform cutting along edge6. 2D plane strain deformation7. No side spreading of material8. Uniform stress distribution on

shear plane9. Forces primarily in directions of

velocity and uncut chip thickness

Orthogonal Cutting Geometry

74

Primary shear zone:Material ahead of tool is sheared to form a chip

Secondary shear zone:Sheared material (chip) partially deforms and moves along the rake face

Tertiary zone:Flank of tool rubs the newly machined surface

Simple 2D orthogonal cutting can help explain the general mechanics of metal removal

Tool

Workpiece

Chip

Primary Shearing Zone

75

𝐹𝑑𝑐

𝐹𝑓𝑐

𝐹𝑛

𝐹𝑠

𝐹𝑣

βˆ…π‘

𝐹𝑠 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ βˆ’ 𝐹𝑓𝑐 sinπœ™π‘ ;

𝐹𝑛 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 sin πœ™π‘ + 𝐹𝑓𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ ;𝐹𝑠𝐹𝑛

=cosπœ™π‘ βˆ’sinπœ™π‘

sin πœ™π‘ cosπœ™π‘

𝐹𝑑𝑐𝐹𝑓𝑐

Force components in primary shear zone

𝐹𝑒

π›Όπ‘Ÿ π›Όπ‘Ÿ- rake angle; πœ™π‘ - shear angle𝐹𝑑𝑐 - tangential force/cutting force;𝐹𝑓𝑐 - feed force/thrust force

𝐹𝑠 - force acting along the shear plane𝐹𝑛 - normal force acting on the shear plane𝐹𝑣 - force acting on the rake face𝐹𝑒 - frictional force

β€’ Forces acting on the tool that can be measured: Cutting force Ftc and Thrust force Ffc

β€’ Other forces cannot be directly measured

Chip ratios – basic characteristics

76

sinπœ™π‘ =β„Ž

π‘™πœ™

β„Ž

β„Žπ‘

βˆ…π‘

π›Όπ‘Ÿ

βˆ…π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π‘™πœ™

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ =β„Žπ‘π‘™πœ™

β„Ž = π‘™πœ™sinπœ™π‘ β„Žπ‘ = π‘™πœ™cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π‘Ÿπ‘ =β„Ž

β„Žπ‘=

sinπœ™π‘

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

&

&

Chip thickness ratio

From mass (volume flow rate) conservation, chip thickness ratio β‰… chip length ratio

π‘Ÿπ‘ =β„Ž

β„Žπ‘=𝑙𝑐𝑙= π‘Ÿπ‘™ No side spreading assumption, π‘Ÿπ‘€ = 1

πœ™π‘ = tanβˆ’1π‘Ÿπ‘ cos π›Όπ‘Ÿ

1 βˆ’ π‘Ÿπ‘sin π›Όπ‘Ÿ

Velocity Relations

80

𝑉𝑠 = 𝑉cos π›Όπ‘Ÿ

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

𝑉𝑠

𝑉

𝑉𝑐

𝑉𝑠𝑉𝑐

𝑉

π›Όπ‘Ÿ

πœ™π‘

πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π›Όπ‘Ÿ

πœ™π‘

πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘ŸChip velocity, 𝑉𝑐 (acknowledging conservation of volume-flow rate):

𝑉𝑐𝑉=𝑙𝑐/βˆ†π‘‘

𝑙/βˆ†π‘‘= π‘Ÿπ‘™ β‡’ 𝑉𝑐 = π‘Ÿπ‘™π‘‰

π‘Ÿπ‘ = π‘Ÿπ‘™ =sinπœ™π‘

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

𝑉𝑐 =sinπœ™π‘

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿπ‘‰

Shear velocity, 𝑉𝑠 is vector sum of 𝑉𝑐 and 𝑉

Shear Strain and Material Movement

81

Undeformed chip section 𝐴0π΅π‘œπ΄1𝐡1moves with velocity 𝑉

When one element traverses the shear plane in time βˆ†π‘‘:

point 𝐴1 moves to point 𝐴2, point 𝐴0 moves to point 𝐴1

point 𝐡1 moves to point 𝐡2, point 𝐡0 moves to point 𝐡1

Undeformed chip section 𝐴0π΅π‘œπ΄1𝐡1hence becomes deformed chip with section 𝐴1𝐡1𝐴2𝐡2

Hence chip is shifted from expected position of 𝐡2β€² 𝐴2

β€² to 𝐡2𝐴2 because of shearing

Shear Strain and Shear Strain Rate

82

βˆ†π‘₯

𝑦

𝛾

tan 𝛾 =βˆ†π‘₯

𝑦𝛾 =

βˆ†π‘₯

𝑦𝛾 =

βˆ†π‘ 

βˆ†π‘‘=𝐴2𝐴2

β€²

𝐴1𝐢=𝐴2

′𝐢

𝐴1𝐢+𝐢𝐴2𝐴1𝐢

= cotπœ™π‘ + tan πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘ŸSmallangles

Shear strain rate

αˆΆπ›Ύ =𝛾

βˆ†π‘‘

Assuming shear zone increment is βˆ†π‘  and the thickness of the shear deformation zone is βˆ†π‘‘

𝛾 =βˆ†π‘ 

βˆ†π‘‘π‘‰π‘  =

βˆ†π‘ 

βˆ†π‘‘αˆΆπ›Ύ =

π‘‰π‘ βˆ†π‘‘

= 𝑉cosπ›Όπ‘Ÿ

βˆ†π‘‘ cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

βˆ†π‘‘ β†’ 0 β†’ thin shear plane β†’ very large strain rates

Primary Shearing Zone

83

Endres, Adv. Mcing processes

84

Assuming uniform shear stress distribution on the shear plane and that all shear plane material is plastically shearing

πœπ‘  =𝐹𝑠𝐴𝑠

𝐴𝑠 = π‘β„Ž

sinπœ™π‘

𝐹𝑠 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ βˆ’ 𝐹𝑓𝑐 sinπœ™π‘

𝐴𝑠 - shear plane area𝑏 – width of cut (depth of cut in turning)β„Ž - uncut chip thickness πœ™π‘ - shear angle𝐹𝑠 - force acting along the shear plane𝐹𝑛 - normal force acting on the shear plane

Normal stress on the shear plane

πœŽπ‘  =𝐹𝑛𝐴𝑠

𝐹𝑛 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 sinπœ™π‘ + 𝐹𝑓𝑐 cosπœ™π‘

Primary Shearing Zone

Orthogonal Cutting Geometry

85

Primary shear zone:Material ahead of tool is sheared to form a chip

Secondary shear zone:Sheared material (chip) partially deforms and moves along the rake face

Tertiary zone:Flank of tool rubs the newly machined surface

Secondary Shear Zone

86

𝐹𝑣 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 cosπ›Όπ‘Ÿ βˆ’ 𝐹𝑓𝑐 sin π›Όπ‘Ÿ ;

𝐹𝑒 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 sin π›Όπ‘Ÿ + 𝐹𝑓𝑐 cos π›Όπ‘Ÿ ;𝐹𝑣𝐹𝑒

=cosπ›Όπ‘Ÿ βˆ’sin π›Όπ‘Ÿsin π›Όπ‘Ÿ cos π›Όπ‘Ÿ

𝐹𝑑𝑐𝐹𝑓𝑐

Force components in secondary shear zone

πœ‡π‘Ž = tanπ›½π‘Ž =𝐹𝑒𝐹𝑣

Average friction coeff on rake face:

Force Circle Diagram

87

Tool

𝐹𝑑𝑐

𝐹𝑓𝑐

𝐹𝑛

𝐹𝑠

𝐹𝑣

βˆ…π‘

𝐹𝑒

π›Όπ‘Ÿβˆ…π‘πΉπ‘

π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ π›½π‘Ž

88

Tool

𝐹𝑑𝑐

𝐹𝑓𝑐

𝐹𝑛

𝐹𝑠

𝐹𝑣

βˆ…π‘

𝐹𝑒

π›Όπ‘Ÿβˆ…π‘

π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π›Όπ‘Ÿ

π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ π›½π‘Ž

𝐹𝑠 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ βˆ’ 𝐹𝑓𝑐 sinπœ™π‘ ;

𝐹𝑛 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 sinπœ™π‘ + 𝐹𝑓𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ ;

Force components in primary shear zone

Force components in primary shear zoneusing the force circle diagram

𝐹𝑠 = 𝐹𝑐 cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ ;𝐹𝑛 = 𝐹𝑐 sin πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ ;

𝐹𝑐

Force components in secondary shear zone using the force circle diagram

𝐹𝑣 =? ; 𝐹𝑒 =?

Force Circle Diagram

Total Power Consumed in Cutting

89

𝑃𝑑𝑐 = 𝑃𝑠 + 𝑃𝑒

𝑃𝑑𝑐 = 𝐹𝑠𝑉𝑠 + 𝐹𝑒𝑉𝑐

𝑉𝑠 = 𝑉cos π›Όπ‘Ÿ

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

Total power consumed in cutting is sum of energy spent in shear and friction zones

𝐹𝑒 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 sin π›Όπ‘Ÿ + 𝐹𝑓𝑐 cos π›Όπ‘ŸπΉπ‘  = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ βˆ’ 𝐹𝑓𝑐 sin πœ™π‘

πœ™π‘ - shear angle?𝐹𝑠 - force acting along the shear plane?𝐹𝑒 - frictional force?

𝑉𝑐 = 𝑉sinπœ™π‘

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

Force Prediction for Power Consumption

90

𝑃𝑑𝑐 = 𝐹𝑠𝑉𝑠 + 𝐹𝑒𝑉𝑐

𝐹𝑠 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 cosπœ™π‘ βˆ’ 𝐹𝑓𝑐 sinπœ™π‘ 𝐹𝑠 = 𝐹𝑐 cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

𝐹𝑠 = πœπ‘ π΄π‘  = πœπ‘  π‘β„Ž

sin πœ™π‘

Total power consumed in cutting is sum of energy spent in shear and friction zones

Primary chip generation mechanism is shearing

𝑃𝑠 = 𝐹𝑠𝑉𝑠

𝑉𝑠 = 𝑉cos π›Όπ‘Ÿ

cos πœ™π‘ βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

Shear force can also be expressed as

Resultant cutting force can be now be expressed in terms of shear stress, friction and shear angles, width of cut, and feed rate as follows:

𝐹𝑐 =𝐹𝑠

cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ= πœπ‘  π‘β„Ž

1

sinπœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘ŸKnow everything but for πœ™π‘

91

Resultant cutting force can be now be expressed in terms of shear stress, friction and shear angles, width of cut, and feed rate as follows:

𝐹𝑐 =𝐹𝑠

cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ= πœπ‘  π‘β„Ž

1

sinπœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

Nature always takes the path of least resistance, so during cutting πœ™π‘ takes a value such that least amount of energy is consumed, i.e. since πœπ‘ , 𝑏, β„Ž, and π›½π‘Ž and π›Όπ‘Ÿ are given and do not

change, power consumed becomes:

𝐹𝑑𝑐 = 𝐹𝑐 cos π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ = πœπ‘  π‘β„Žcos π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

sinπœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

𝑃𝑑𝑐 = 𝑉𝐹𝑑𝑐

Recalling the FCD

Power consumed during cutting:

𝑃𝑑𝑐 πœ™π‘ =π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘

sin πœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

Shear Angle – from Merchant’s Energy Principle

Shear Angle – from Merchant’s Energy Principle

92

Nature always takes the path of least resistance, so during cutting , πœ™π‘ takes a value such that least amount of energy is consumed, i.e. since πœπ‘ , 𝑏, β„Ž, and π›½π‘Ž and π›Όπ‘Ÿ are given and do not

change, power consumed becomes:

𝑃𝑑𝑐 πœ™π‘ =π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘

sinπœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

𝑃𝑑𝑐 πœ™π‘ will be a minimum when the denominator is a maximum, hence differentiate denominator w.r.t πœ™π‘ and equate it to zero:

cosπœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ βˆ’ sinπœ™π‘ sin πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ = 0

cos 2πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ = 0

2πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ =πœ‹

2 πœ™π‘ =πœ‹

4βˆ’π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

2

Force Prediction

93

𝐹𝑑𝑐 = 𝐹𝑐 cos π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ = πœπ‘  π‘β„Žcos π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

sinπœ™π‘ cos πœ™π‘ + π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿπ‘ƒπ‘‘π‘ = 𝑉𝐹𝑑𝑐

πœ™π‘ =πœ‹

4βˆ’π›½π‘Ž βˆ’ π›Όπ‘Ÿ

2

Shear angle using Merchant’s minimum energy principle

Force prediction Power consumed

β€’ Shear angle prediction with these and other such models are not very accurate

β€’ However, they provide important relationships between tool geometry and shear

angle – which is important for tool design

β€’ To increase shear plane angle β‚‹ Increase the rake angle β‚‹ Reduce the friction angle (or reduce the coefficient of friction)

β€’ Higher shear plane angle means smaller shear plane which means lower shear force, cutting forces, power, and temperature

94

β€’ Contact mechanics between flank face and finished surface depends on

tool wear, preparation of cutting edge and friction characteristics of tool

and workpiece

β€’ Assume total friction force on flank face is 𝐹𝑓𝑓

β€’ And force normal to flank face in 𝐹𝑓𝑛

β€’ Assume pressure (πœŽπ‘“) on the flank face to be uniform (a gross

oversimplification)

𝐹𝑓𝑓

𝐹𝑓𝑛

𝛾𝑓

Tertiary Deformation Zone

Tertiary Deformation Zone

95

𝐹𝑑𝑒 = 𝐹𝑓𝑛 sin 𝛾𝑓 + 𝐹𝑓𝑓 cos 𝛾𝑓 ;

𝐹𝑓𝑒 = 𝐹𝑓𝑛 cos 𝛾𝑓 + 𝐹𝑓𝑓 sin 𝛾𝑓;

𝐹𝑓𝑛 = πœŽπ‘“π‘‰π΅π‘

𝑉𝐡

𝛾𝑓

πœ‡π‘“ = 𝐹𝑓𝑓/𝐹𝑓𝑛

Normal force on the flank face

Because the tool rubs on the finished surface, there is friction

Resolving contact forces into tangentialand feed directions

Any measured forces will include forces due to shearing and tothe tertiary deformation process, i.e. rubbing/ploughing at theflank of the cutting edge

𝐹𝑑 = 𝐹𝑑𝑐 + 𝐹𝑑𝑒;𝐹𝑓 = 𝐹𝑓𝑐 + 𝐹𝑓𝑒;

All cutting force expressions presented up until now were only for shearing, but in reality, edge forces also exist, hence edge forces must be subtracted from measured tangential and feed

forces before applying laws of orthogonal cutting mechanics

Orthogonal and Oblique Cutting Geometry

96

Cutting velocity is inclined at an acute angle 𝑖 to the cutting edge

Cutting velocity is perpendicular to cutting edge

Altintas, Mfg. Automation

Prediction of cutting forces in oblique cutting

97

𝐹𝑑 = πΎπ‘‘π‘π‘β„Ž + 𝐾𝑑𝑒𝑏;𝐹𝑓 = πΎπ‘“π‘π‘β„Ž + 𝐾𝑓𝑒𝑏;

πΉπ‘Ÿ = πΎπ‘Ÿπ‘π‘β„Ž + πΎπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘;

𝐾𝑑𝑐 =πœπ‘  cos πœƒπ‘› + tan πœƒπ‘– tan 𝑖

cos πœƒπ‘› + πœ™π‘› cos πœ™π‘– + tan πœƒπ‘– sinπœ™π‘– sinπœ™π‘›

𝐾𝑓𝑐 =πœπ‘  sin πœƒπ‘›

cos πœƒπ‘› + πœ™π‘› cos πœ™π‘– + tan πœƒπ‘– sinπœ™π‘– sinπœ™π‘›

πΎπ‘Ÿπ‘ =πœπ‘ π‘β„Ž tan πœƒπ‘– βˆ’ cos πœƒπ‘› tan 𝑖

cos πœƒπ‘› + πœ™π‘› cos πœ™π‘– + tan πœƒπ‘– sinπœ™π‘– sin πœ™π‘›

πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘ =πœπ‘ π‘β„Ž tan πœƒπ‘– βˆ’ cos πœƒπ‘› tan 𝑖

cos πœƒπ‘› + πœ™π‘› cos πœ™π‘– + tan πœƒπ‘– sinπœ™π‘– sinπœ™π‘›

𝐹𝑑𝑐 =πœπ‘ π‘β„Ž cos πœƒπ‘› + tan πœƒπ‘– tan 𝑖

cos πœƒπ‘› + πœ™π‘› cos πœ™π‘– + tan πœƒπ‘– sinπœ™π‘– sinπœ™π‘›πΉπ‘“π‘ =

πœπ‘ π‘β„Ž sin πœƒπ‘›cos πœƒπ‘› + πœ™π‘› cos πœ™π‘– + tan πœƒπ‘– sinπœ™π‘– sinπœ™π‘›

Force in direction of cutting speed

Expressing force components as a 𝑓 πœπ‘ , πœ™π‘›, πœ™π‘– , πœƒπ‘–, πœƒπ‘› :

Force in direction of thrust

Force in direction of normal

Rewriting forces in the convenient form of:

Cutting Temperature

β€’ Approximately 98% of the energy in machining is

converted into heat

β€’ This can cause temperatures to be very high at the

tool-chip

β€’ The remaining energy (about 2%) is retained as

elastic energy in the chip

Cutting Temperatures are Important

High cutting temperatures

1. reduce tool life

2. produce hot chips that pose safety hazards to the

machine operator

3. can cause inaccuracies in part dimensions due to

thermal expansion of work material

Cutting Temperature

Analytical method derived by Nathan Cook from dimensional analysis using experimental data for various work materials

where T = temperature rise at tool-chip interface; U = specific energy;v = cutting speed; to = chip thickness before cut; C = volumetricspecific heat of work material; K = thermal diffusivity of work material

333040

..

K

vt

C

UT o

β€’ Experimental methods can be used to measure

temperatures in machining

– Most frequently used technique is the tool-chip

thermocouple

β€’ Using this method, Ken Trigger determined the

speed-temperature relationship to be of the form:

T = K vm

where T = measured tool-chip interface temperature,

and v = cutting speed

Cutting Temperature

Example

Consider a turning operation performed on steel whose hardness = 225 HB at a speed = 3.0 m/s, feed = 0.25 mm, and depth = 4.0 mm. Using values of thermal properties and the appropriate specific energy value from tables, compute an estimate of cutting temperature using the Cook equation. Assume ambient temperature = 20C.

Solution: From Table, U = 2.2 N-m/mm3 = 2.2 J/mm3

From Table, = 7.87 g/cm3 = 7.87(10-3) g/mm3

From Table, C = 0.11 Cal/g-C. From note β€œa” at the bottom of the table, 1 cal = 4.186 J.

From Table, thermal conductivity k = 0.046 J/s-mm-C

Thus, C = 0.11(4.186) = 0.460 J/ g-C

C = (7.87 g/cm3)(0.46 J/g-C) = 3.62(10-3) J/mm3-C

Also, thermal diffusivity K = k/C

K = 0.046 J/s-mm-C /[(7.87 x 10-3 g/mm3)(0.46 J/g-C)] = 12.7 mm2/s

Using Cook’s equation, to = f = 0.25 mm

T = (0.4(2.2)/3.62(10-3))[3(103)(0.25)/12.7]0.333 = 0.2428(103)(59.06)0.333

= 242.8(3.89) = 944.4 C

Final temperature, taking ambient temperature in account T = 20 + 944 = 964C