T HE O FFICE OF B USHFIRE R ISK M ANAGEMENT, L OCAL G OVERNMENT AND B USHFIRE R ISK M ANAGEMENT R...
-
Upload
theodore-hutchinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of T HE O FFICE OF B USHFIRE R ISK M ANAGEMENT, L OCAL G OVERNMENT AND B USHFIRE R ISK M ANAGEMENT R...
THE OFFICE OF BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT REFORM
NAMN Forum
12 August 2015
THE OFFICE OF BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT
Established in early 2012 as part of the State
Government’s response to the findings of the Keelty report
“Appreciating the Risk”
OBRM was created to regulate prescribed burning as an
independent office within the Department of Fire &
Emergency Services (DFES)
Reports directly to the Fire and Emergency Services
Commissioner
OBRMS CHARTER AND CHALLENGE
Mission statement :“To enhance the efficient and effective management of
bushfire related risk in Western Australia in order to protect
people, assets and other things valuable to communities.”
Charter :1. Set and approve state-wide bushfire related risk policy
and standards
2. Monitor and asses agencies’ performance against
standards
3. Report to the FES Commissioner
4. Communicate and promote best practice in bushfire
risk management
BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT
There is no silver bullet!
Requires a multifaceted approach
Leadership from State and Local Government
Cooperative and consultative development of policies
Review and refinement of policies over time
Involves broader community understanding of bushfire risk
“Best practice guides needs to be written by end users with
experience in fire control and hazard reduction burning - not by
public servants or self proclaimed experts.”
STANDARDISED RISK MANAGEMENT OF PRESCRIBED BURNING
Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) prescribed burning framework, systems and processes aligned to ISO31000
Department of Fire & Emergency Services (DFES) prescribed burning framework and systems aligned to ISO31000
Local Government prescribed burning framework, systems and processes aligned
Com
ing
Soon
WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT?
Bushfires Act 1954 responsibility Planning in Bushfire-Prone Areas
Permit to Burn
Bushfire Risk Management Planning
PLANNING IN BUSHFIRE-PRONE AREAS
Local Government input to Bushfire-Prone Area Maps
Implementing Planning and Development Policies and Guidelines (SPP3.7)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERMIT TO BURN
Improve understanding and
management of bushfire
risk
Supportive processes for
LG’s and permit holders
Reliable advice to support
planning and
implementation of planned
burns
A contemporary Permit to
Burn Enhance understanding of
roles and responsibilities
Greater consistency in
permit issuing practices
Reduce potential for loss
of planned fire events
Influence review of DFES
publications to reflect best
practice and incorporate
outputs of the project
PERMIT TO BURN TRIAL – PHASE 1
Local Government Permit Trial (2013/14)
Objectives of the trial were:
To trial an enhanced Permit to Burn with several Local Governments (metro and south west); and
To collect permit burning data from participating Local Governments for analysis.
Local Government Consultation (2014)
To seek feedback from all local governments regarding:
The current Permit to Burn format; and
The systems and processes used to manage risks related to permit burning activities.
PHASE 2 - PROJECT OUTPUTS
Project outputs may include some or all of the following:
Checklists and tools for use by the Fire Control Officer;
An application form, including guiding instructions for
the applicant’s information;
An example best practice permit;
An example best practice Prescribed Fire Plan;
A best practice guide for prescribed burning in the
region; and
Supporting information publications and improvements
to DFES publications, including the Fire Control Officer’s
Handbook, Training Manual and Winter Burning Guide.
PHASE 2 – HOW TO DO IT
6 LG Permit Review Zones
Kimberley Pilbara-Gascoyne Mining and Pastoral Northern
Agricultural Southern
Agricultural & Forest Metro
BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING (BRMP) AND BUSHFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ISO31000 aligned process Local Government led (DFES supported) ID and prioritise assets at risk from bushfire Planning process that develops and tracks
treatment strategies for managing bushfire risk Supported by database (BRMS) that schedules,
records, analyses and reports on bushfire risk and treatment across the state
Pilot undertaken 2014 (4 LGs)
WHICH 16 LG’S SO FAR?
LSW - Nannup, Boyup Brook, Augusta-Margaret
River, Donnybrook-Ballingup, Bridgetown-
Greenbushes
SW – Collie
GS - Jerramungup, Boddington, Ravensthorpe, West
Arthur, Woodanilling
MWG - Irwin, Northampton, Carnamah
GM – Beverley
Metro - Chittering
OBRM ROLE IN BRMP
Responsible for developing the BRMP Standard
(Guidelines, templates and handbook)
Working alongside DFES in the development of
BRMS
Part of the Pilot Reference Group involved in
trialling the pilot guidelines in 4 Local
Governments in the South-West of the State
OTHER REFORM WORK OBRM IS DOING
Quality Assurance – DPaW, DFES, NGOs
Best Practice Guides for Prescribed Burning
PERMIT TRIAL – PHASE 2The project phase will be to consult with stakeholders to determine:
How do we currently perceive and describe risk?
What are the key issues with current processes?
What are the possible solutions to these issues?
How can we work together to address these issues?
What are the minimum requirements for a permit?
What are the components of a best practice model framework?
What elements of the framework should be flexible to allow local government to implement risk management principles tailored to local circumstances?
What tools and information need to be included in a best practice guide for prescribed burning in the region?
PERMIT TRIAL – PHASE 2