System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

17
[email protected] du Quark Matter 2005 1 System Size and Energy Dependence of System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production Strangeness Production Sevil Salur Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration

description

System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production. Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration. p T spectra and kinetic freeze-out of particles . Investigation of strange particle yields and ratios. Study of resonances (thermal vs chemical freeze-outs ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

Page 1: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

1

System Size and Energy Dependence System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Productionof Strangeness Production

Sevil SalurSevil Salur

Yale University

for the STAR Collaboration

Page 2: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

2

pT spectra and kinetic freeze-out of particles . Investigation of strange particle yields and ratios.

Study of resonances (thermal vs chemical freeze-outs )

Comparison of RHIC and SPS yields Strangeness enhancement

(Energy dependence & source type) RAA comparison with RCP and RdAu

Investigation of strangeness ordering. Is there a scaling in Au+Au production for the strange

quarks? N Participants vs N Binary ?

Outline

Page 3: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

3

200 GeV Au+Au

ssssss200 GeV Au+Au

udss200 GeV Au+Au

dssss200 GeV Au+Au

The Corrected Strange ParticleSpectra

200 GeV p+p 200 GeV p+p

200 GeV d+Au

200 GeV d+Au 200 GeV d+Au

62 GeV Au+Au 62 GeV Au+Au 62 GeV Au+Au

*(1520) (ud*(1520) (udss))**(uu(uuss))

QM Posters:

R. Bellwied,

M.Lamont,

C.Markert,

M.Munhoz&J.Takahashi,

J.Speltz

Y-4 Au+Au and Y-5 Cu+Cu is in Y-4 Au+Au and Y-5 Cu+Cu is in progress !progress !

Page 4: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

4

• ,K, p <T> at 200 GeV > 62 GeV Tkin at 200 GeV =62 GeV

• <T> at 200 GeV = 62 GeV Tkin at 200 GeV >62 GeV

Tkinetic vs Transverse velocity (<T>)

Tkinetic from a Blast-Wave is not same as the Temperature from a Hydro Model.

QM Poster: J.Speltz

• Temperature Tkinetic is higher for baryons with higher strange quark content for Blast-wave fits.

• Spectral shapes are different.

Most Central Collisions

0.13

T=100 MeV

T=132 MeV

Page 5: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

5

STAR Preliminary

QM Poster: M.Munhoz&J.Takahashi

• s-Baryon production is ~constant at mid-rapidity.

STAR Preliminary

Strange Baryon Production and Collision Energy…

s-Baryon production equals s-Baryon at RHIC Energies!

s-Baryon rises smoothly at mid-rapidity.

• s-Baryon Resonance follow the same trend.

Au+Au

Pb+Pb

STAR Preliminary

Page 6: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

6

/ ratios are approximately independent of the system

size at RHIC energies.

Strange ParticleRatios vs System Size

independent of system size at 200 GeV and equal to p+p values at lower energies.

QM Poster: C Markert, D. Mishra

Re-scattering and regeneration is needed ! t > 0, constant for different centralities!Regeneration σ(K*) > σ(*)

Page 7: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

7

and yields in AuAurelative to pp

rises.

System Size Dependence at 200 GeV

Correlation volume not well modelled by Npart

Is the scaling more important than normalization ?

Canonical suppression increases with increasing

strangeness

and arenot flat

Redlich et al.

Page 8: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

8

s-Quarks Have Different Scaling!

Scaling according to quark content?

u, d – scale with Npart

– already observed.

s – scale with Nbin

– appears better for strange particles.

K0s – 1/2*Npart + 1/2*Nbin

p – Npart

– 2/3*Npart + 1/3*Nbin

– 1/3*Npart + 2/3*Nbin

– Nbin

– Nbin

Npart

Does strangeness “see” a significant NBin contribution?

Normalized to central data

QM Poster: H. Caines

is puzzling!

Page 9: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

9

Nuclear Modification Factor Rcp

0-5%

40-60%Y-4 K0

s

√sNN=200 GeV

Baryons and mesons are different !

QM Poster: M.Lamont

62 GeV Rcp shows less suppression.

√sNN=62 GeV 0-5%

40-60%

Baryon and meson suppression sets in at different pT .

Page 10: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

10

Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 052302 Au+Au √sNN=200 GeV

Au+Au √sNN=62 GeV

STAR Preliminary

Baryon and meson suppression sets in at

same quark pT .

0-5%

40-60%

√sNN=200 GeV

Nuclear Modification Factor Rcp

Coalescence vs Fragmentation?

0-5%

40-60%

Baryon and meson suppression sets in at

different pT .

Y-4 K0s

√sNN=200 GeV

Page 11: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

11

s-quark

Ordering with strangeness content!

Mesons (h+ + h-, K0s , ) follow

similar trends.

Strange baryons don’t show suppression.

Rcp Raa for strange baryons. Canonical suppression in p+p …?

s-quarks scaled with NBin

u&d-quarks scaled with Npart

scaled with N Part

STA

R

Pre

limin

ary

Au+Au

p+p

0-5%

√sNN=200 GeV

s-quarks scaled with NBin

u&d-quarks scaled with Npart

scaled with N Bin

STA

R

Pre

limin

ary

Au+Au

p+p

0-5%

√sNN=200 GeV

RAA of Strange Particles

STAR Preliminary

Au+Au

p+p

0-5%

√sNN=200 GeV

STA

R

Pre

limin

ary

Particles with strange quarks scale differently than non-

strange!

Page 12: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

12

Does entropy drive the strangeness yield?

SPS and RHIC data follows same curves…

Is there a universal scaling?

Enhancements are the same or even bigger at RHIC than at SPS !

Instead of Npart dNch/dη

Correlated to the entropy of the system!

Page 13: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

13

Summary and Conclusions

Transverse velocity T increases with collision energy.

TFO > TFOfrom Blast-wave but TFO = TFOfrom Hydro

s-Baryon production equals that of s-Baryon at RHIC energies.Baryon transport is ~ independent of system size at RHIC energies.

Rescattering and regeneration are required to model resonance production. Cross-sections and lifetimes vary (K* vs *). t > 0 between chemical and thermal freezeout for all centralities.

RAA different than RCP - canonical suppression is being investigated in RAA and RdAu .

Coalescence can explain the meson baryon difference at 62 GeV collisions too.

Particles with s-quarks appear to scale differently than non-s quarks. Maybe s-quarks “see“ a different correlation volume than light quarks?

Yields scale with dNch/d for SPS and RHIC

(universal scaling?)

Page 14: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

14

• 19 D. Mishra Measurement of++ and K∗ production in d+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV 

• 33 G. Van Buren  The Ratio  at RHIC • 60 R. Bellwied Strange particle production mechanisms in pp collisions at RHIC • 61 B. Bezverkhny Initial studies of two particle azimuthal correlations using baryons

in collisions at RHIC• 67 L. Gaillard Identified two-hadron correlations at STAR using , and K0

s with charged hadrons in AuAu at √sNN = 200 GeV 

• 131  H. Caines  The effects of varying the correlation volume on strangeness • 146 M. A. Lamont  High momentum strange baryon anomalies in heavy ion collisions at

RHIC  • 151  C. Markert  The influence of medium properties on the resonance production in

RHIC collision• 152  C. M. Mironov STAR measurements of strange hadron R AuAu and R dAu 

• 155  M. G. Munhoz  Measurements of K0s and  production in collisions at 

√sNN =  62 GeV Au+Au • 163  F. Simon Forward  production and nuclear stopping power in d+Au 

collisions at RHIC • 164  J. Speltz Energy dependence systematics of strange and multi-strange

particle production • 167 A. Tang  Strangelet search at RHIC 

Strange Poster Presentations:

Page 15: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

15

• EXTRAS…

Page 16: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

16

Page 17: System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production

[email protected] Matter 2005

17

Nuclear Modification Factor RdAu

QM Poster: C. Mironov

Resonances follow a similar trend !

Cronin Effect might explain R dAu above 1

Less so for mesons than baryons !

d+Au

p+p

√sNN=200 GeV