Synthesis of highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.0 1, 6...
Transcript of Synthesis of highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.0 1, 6...
177
Chapter 6
Synthesis of highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
]
dodecane-9, 12 -dione
6.1 INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, we present the development of a simple and efficient method for the
synthesis of multifunctionalized 2-benzylidene-4-benzyl-7-phenyl-4, 10, 11-
triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane-9, 12-dione from a simple starting material N-
Benzyl-4-piperidone (NBP), aryl aldehyde and cyanoacetamide. This four-component
domino reaction provides the following fascinating features: (i) easily accessible
precursor of NBP, aryl aldehydes and cyanoacetamide. (ii) eco-friendly and simple
reaction in which mild base is used as catalyst; (iii) rate of the reaction is fast thereby
enabling the product formation within 30-60 min, thus the consumption of energy and
manpower for future pharmaceutical and industrial production, and (iv) a reaction
with easy workup which requires only neutralisation and extraction with organic
solvent which is then subjected to column chromatography. This domino reaction
gives quick access to synthesise highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
]
dodecane-9, 12-dione (tricyclo dilactam) in which two quaternary carbon-amino
functionalities among four stereogenic centres are there. This reaction is more
fascinating since it gives access to tricyclo dilactams possessing two quaternary
amino functionalities among four stereogenic centers. Such observation is truly
interesting and very rare in organic chemistry. We are the first to report such skeletal
arrangement of tricyclic dilactam using four components via a Domino reaction.
Figure 6.1 Structure of synthesized tricyclo dilactam and multifunctionalized
Tricyclo dilactam
178
6.2 LITERATURE DISCUSSION
Synthesis of fused cyclic amide ring has been the most challenging objective in
synthetic organic chemistry for the past few decades, because such derivatives are
considerably important scaffolds for synthesis and drug design as they can directly
serve in pharmaceutical research. Paquette and co-worker in 1973 reported the
synthesis of mono- and disubstituted bicyclo [4.2.2] deca-2, 4, 7, 9-tetraenes and
studied their reactivity (Paquette et al., 1973). This group synthesised unsaturated
bicyclo [4.3.1] - decane moiety through tricyclic lactam in which carbon framework
underwent rearrangement. On treating this tricyclic lactam with trimethyloxonium
fluoroborate they produced imino ether of lactam. Furthermore, triplet-sensitized
irradiation on this imino ether of lactam clearly gave a product in which the
cyclobutene ring was formed from isomers of butadiene unit as shown in Scheme 6.1.
ν
Scheme 6.1 Synthesis of bicyclo [4.2.2] deca-2, 4, 7, 9-tetraenes
In 1978, Sammes et. al. discussed the synthesis of dihydroxy pyrimidines by
intramolecular cycloaddition reaction of mono- and dihydroxy pyrimidines via
bicyclic dilactam bridged adduct (Sammes et al., 1978). This group had isolated the
bridged bicyclic dilactam adduct under milder conditions along with pyridine, but on
further heating adduct smoothly decomposed to form pyridone as shown in Scheme
6.2. Bridged adduct is very unstable and even this conversion would be possible over
chromatography silica gel in polar solvent. This group had tested the generality of this
cycloaddition process to a variety of derivatives. Among these derivatives 5-(hex-5-
179
en-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4(3H)-one was one of the homologues for which they
carried out thermolysis at 198°C and got 3-methyloctahydro-1H-3,8a-
(epiminomethano) isoquinoline-1,9-dione adduct as shown in Scheme 6.3.
Scheme 6.2 Synthesis of pyridone via bridged bicyclic dilactam adduct
Scheme 6.3 Thermolysis of pyrimidin-4(3H)-one to produce bridged bicyclic
dilactam adduct
Mukherjee et. al., in 1983, described the preparation of tricyclo [6.3.1.01, 6
] dodecane
and tricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane ring systems which involves intramolecular
cyclisation of diazomethyl ketones (Mukherjee et al., 1983). Tricyclo [6.2.2.0 l, 6
]
dodecane framework was synthesised from bridged carboxylic systems related to
diterpenes by incorporating methyl groups at C-2 and C-8 and oxygen function at C-9
and dienone synthesised from β-naphthoic ester by reductive methylation followed by
intramolecular cyclisation of diazomethyl ketone as shown in Scheme 6.4.
Scheme 6.4 Thermolysis of pyrimidin-4(3H)-one to produce bridged bicycle
In 1990, Hickmott et. al., reported the synthesis of tricyclo [8.4.0.01, 6
] tetradecane and
Tricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane ring systems for the first time (Hickmott et al., 1990).
180
At δ-position of the dienamine, the reaction happens mostly at the less reactive centre
and in methanol solvent whereas when the reaction was carried out at β-position (C-1)
of the dienamine with methyl propenoate and propenenitrile with dienamine occurs at
the more reactive site in all solvents. However, this group did not propose any
mechanism of the subsequent cyclisation but they suggested that enolate anion would
be formed initially which might be involved in a prototropic shift to give 4a-methyl-7-
(pyrrolidin-1-ium-1-ylidene)-1, 2, 3, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7- octahydronaphthalen-1-yl) butan-
2-olate followed by cyclisation onto C-8a of the eniminium salt thus producing the
quaternary centre. For the first time, this group developed a method to access novel
[8.4.0.01, 6
] tetradecane ring system as shown in Scheme 6.5.
Scheme 6.5 Access to the novel [8.4.0.01, 6
] tetradecane ring system
Fukumoto et. al., in 1994, presented the synthesis of tricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane and
tricyclo [5.3.1.0 3, 8
] undecane derivatives (Fukumoto et al., 1994). This group carried
out a reaction between 6-[5(E)-6- (methoxycarbonyl) hex-5-enyl] -2-cyclohexen-l-one
and LHMDS followed by the addition of formaldehyde (one-pot) which resulted in
cascade Michael-Michael-aldol reaction, gave hydroxymethylated tricyc1o[6.2.2.01, 6
]
dodecane as shown in Scheme 6.6. They synthesised methylated tricyc1o [5.3.1.03, 8
]
undecane by a Michael-Michael-substitution reaction from 5-[4(E)-5-
(methoxycarbonyl) pent-4-enyl]-2-methyl-2-cyclohexen-l-one and LHMDS followed
by the addition of methyliodide in the presence of HMPA as shown in Scheme 6.7.
Scheme 6.6 Synthesis of tricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane
181
Scheme 6.7 Synthesis of tricyclo [5.3.1.0 3, 8
] undecane
In 1998, Bhat et. al., described the synthesis of novel 7, 9, l l-trimethyl-8, 10, 12-
trioxatetracyclo [5.3.2.0.4,9
.04, 11
]-dodec-1-yl]-2-butanone skeleton by treating H-
ZSM-5 with 2-acetyl-3.4- dihydro-2,5-di (3"-oxo-butyl)-6-methyl-(2H)-pyran (Bhat
et al., 1998). They obtained acid form of zeolite Na-ZSM-5 through successive ion-
exchange with 1M NH4NO3 solution and this was followed by heating for 6h at 673K.
They achieved the synthesis of tetracyclo [5.3.2.0.4,9
.04, 11
]-dodecane by reacting
methyl vinyl ketone with DABCO which gave dimer of methyl vinyl ketone, which
then underwent hetero-Diels-Alder reaction while refluxing it with o-dichlorobenzene
and gave 2-acetyl-3, 4-dihydro-2, 5-di (3'-oxobutyl)- 6-methyl-(2H)-pyran as shown
in Scheme 6.8.
Scheme 6.8 Synthesis of trioxatetracyclo [5.3.2.0.4, 9
.04, 11
]-dodec-1-yl]-2-
butanone
Ihara et. al., in 1999, accounted for the synthesis of tricyclo [5.2.1.01, 5
] decane ring
system by intramolecular double Michael reaction of 5-(5-methoxycarbonyl-4-
pentenyl)-2-cyclopenten-1- one (Ihara et al., 1999) as shown in Scheme 6.9. Also,
they synthesized ((±)-(1R*, 2R*, 5R*, 6R*, 7S*)-2, 6-dimethyl-6-
ethoxycarbonyltricyclo [5.2.1.01, 5
] - decan-9-one as a single isomer by heating 5-(1,
5-dimethyl-5-ethoxycarbonylpent-4-enyl)-2-cyclopenten-1-one with TMSCl, Et3N,
and ZnCl2 in o-dichlorobenzene at 150°C. They did not propose any mechanism for
the formation of 5-(5-methoxycarbonyl-4-pentenyl)-2-cyclopenten-1- one, but they
considered the fact that the cyclisation proceeds in a stepwise manner. In the first step,
corresponding silyl enol ether was generated from Et3N and TMSCl. The first
Michael addition was between above silyl enol ether to the α, β-unsaturated ester due
to the coordination of carbonyl oxygen of the α, β-unsaturated ester with ZnCl2. They
performed the second Michael addition continuously.
182
The same group (Ihara et. al., 2000) reported the synthesis of tricyclo [6.3.0.03, 9
]
undecan-10-one by intramolecular double Michael addition. Initially they carried out
α-Alkylation of 2,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-1-one using
I(CH2)5OTBDMS followed by α-methylation, and in turn, they underwent retro Diels-
Alder reaction at a high temperature 250 °C to give enone analogue. This intermediate
was subsequently used to synthesise tricyclo [6.3.0.03, 9
] undecan-10-one as shown in
Scheme 6.10.
Scheme 6.9 Synthesis of tricyclo [5.2.1.01, 5
] decane ring system
Scheme 6.10 Synthesis of tricyclo [6.3.0.03, 9
] undecan-10-one
Guigen Li et. al., in 2010, described a domino reaction involving four components,
providing an access to highly functionalized tricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane derivatives
starting from cyclic ketone, cyanoacetamide and aliphatic aldehydes (Guigen et al.,
2010) as shown in Scheme 6.11. They proposed the reaction mechanism which
underwent tandem formations of two different Knoevenagel intermediates in turn
rearrangement of C-C bond, followed by [4+2] cycloaddition, intramolecular
Michael-type addition and carbonyl addition/elimination reactions. They tried the
same reaction with aromatic aldehyde to synthesis the corresponding tricyclo
[6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane but this reaction proceeded in different way to form
183
quinazolines. This group was the first to report the access of four stereogenic centers
with one quaternary carbon-amino attachment.
Scheme 6.11 Synthesis of tricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane derivatives
In 2013, Xiang-Shan Wang et. al., reported the synthesis of fused tetracyclic
heterocycles containing [1, 6] naphthyridines under catalyst free conditions starting
from aromatic aldehyde, an amine, and tert-butyl 2, 4-dioxopiperidine-1-carboxylate
in EtOH at refluxing temperature (Wang et al., 2013) as represented in Scheme 6.12.
They used various heterocyclic amines like 1H-indazol-5-amine, 1H-indazol-6-amine,
1H-indol-5-amine and 1H-benzo [d] imidazol-5-amine, which gave the corresponding
naphthyridines; 11-aryl-3H-indazolo[5,4-b][1,6] naphthyridine, 11-aryl-1H-
indazolo[6,7-b] [1,6]naphthyridine, 11-aryl-3H-indolo [5,4-b] [1,6] naphthyridine and
11-aryl-3H-imidazo[4',5':3,4] benzo [1,2-b] [1,6]naphthyridine derivatives
respectively. Initially they optimized the reaction conditions at various temperatures
in different solvents. From the obtained optimal conditions, they carried out reactions
with diverse range of aldehydes and amines.
Scheme 6.12 Synthesis of fused tetracyclic heterocycles of [1, 6] naphthyridines
184
6.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We report the synthesis of highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane-9,
12 –dione starting from NBP, cyanoacetamide and aryl aldehydes using sodium
hydroxide as catalyst in methanol via domino reaction (Aldol reaction / condensation /
cyclisation by dehydration). This reaction offers several advantages such as use of
simple precursors, low cost, less reaction time, consumption of less energy, good
yield and easy work up. Initially, we carried out this reaction using similar condition
as followed in the previous chapter (chapter 5) to obtain tricyclo dilactam
fluorophore, but unexpectedly we got non-fluorescence compound of highly
functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane-9, 12 –dione. In order to investigate
further we focused on the mechanism to study the path in which the reaction
proceeded and suggested that the mechanism followed Aldol reaction / condensation /
cyclisation followed by dehydration to give the desired product.
Scheme 6.13 Synthesis of highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
]
dodecane-9, 12 -dione
6.3.1 OPTIMISATION OF REACTION CONDITION
In our initial study, we investigated the optimal condition to evaluate the efficiency of
the catalyst for this reaction under various conditions. In order to optimize the
reaction conditions, several metal hydroxides were screened in this reaction. When
the reaction was performed in the absence of base catalyst, the reaction did not
proceed but when the reaction was performed using any of the metal hydroxides, the
reaction proceeded to form highly functionalized triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane-
9, 12 -dione. When sodium hydroxide was used as catalyst it was significant to note
that the reaction provided remarkable yield. We carried out the reaction with 0.25
mol% and increased this up to 2 mol% of catalyst to examine further on the catalyst
185
efficiency and the required molar percentage of the catalyst to generate excellent
yield. When 0.5 mol% of NaOH was used as catalyst, a high yield was observed
whereas it did not further improve the yield significantly when the quantities of
catalyst were inceased, and thus we used 0.5 mol% of NaOH as catalyst in this
reaction.
Table 6.1 Screening of catalyst and solvent effect for the synthesis of tricyclic
dilactamsa
Entry Catalyst (mol %) Solvent (ml) Yield (%)b
1 None Methanol -
2 LiOH (1) Methanol 21
3 LiOH (0.5) Methanol -
4 KOH (1) Methanol 39
5 KOH (0.5) Methanol 28
6 NaOH (2) Methanol 71
7 NaOH (1) Methanol 70
8 NaOH (0.5) Methanol 70
9 NaOH (0.25) Methanol 58
10 NaOH (0.5) None 51
11 NaOH (0.5) CH3CN -
12 NaOH (0.5) DCM -
13 NaOH (0.5) Ethanol 53
14 NaOH (0.5) IPA 48
15 NaOH (0.5) Benzene -
16 NaOH (0.5) Hexane -
aReaction conditions: N-benzyl-4-piperidone (10 mmol); benzaldehyde (20 mmol)
and cyanoacetamide (20 mmol) at room temperature (30oC).
bIsolated yield.
186
Table 6.2 Domino reaction for the synthesis of tricyclic dilactamsa
Entry ArCHO Product Yield (%)b
1 2a
19a
70
2 2g
19b
72
3 2u
19c
60
4 2s
19d
68
187
5 2b
19e
66
6 2t
19f
58
7 2c
19g
62
8 2f
19h
71
9 2r
19i
70
188
10 2d
19j
56
11 2e
19k
48
12 2h
19l
59
13 2q
19m
55
14 2j
19n
61
aReaction conditions: N-benzyl-4-piperidone (10 mmol); aryl aldehydes (20
mmol) and cyanoacetamide (20 mmol) in NaOH (0.5 mol%), MeOH at room
temperature (30oC).
bIsolated yield
189
The solvent was the major factor which influenced the formation of the product and
also affected the product yield. Thus, we carried out this reaction with a variety of
solvents such as polar protic, aprotic and nonpolar solvents using 0.5 mol% of NaOH
as the catalyst (Table 6.1, entry 8, 10–16) in order to investigate the best solvent
suitable for this reaction. We obtained good yields with polar protic solvents such as
ethanol, methanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) but the product was not obtained in the
absence of solvent, with polar aprotic solvents like acetonitrile, dichloromethane
(DCM) and nonpolar solvents like hexane, benzene. Thus, the optimal solvent for
these reaction transformations was methanol. The appropriate optimal condition for
these reaction transformations was 0.5 mol% of sodium hydroxide as catalyst and
methanol as solvent. We also investigated the scope and the limitation of these
reactions. To evaluate the generality of this reaction in other system, this reaction was
carried out using a diverse range of aromatic aldehydes under the same conditions.
The results obtained are summarized in Table 6.2. We also tried with aliphatic
aldehydes instead of aryl aldehydes, but failed to get expected product. We even tried
to synthesise the various tricyclic dilactam using various cyclic ketone. In each case
the product obtained fascinated us, and further studies are being conducted in our
laboratories.
6.3.2 MECHANSITIC INSIGHT
Initially, we expected that the synthesised tricyclic dilactam would be a fluorophore
motif, but it did not show any fluorescence properties. So, we focused on the
mechanism of the path in which the reaction proceeded to form tricyclic dilactam
(19a).
Scheme 6.14 Several reactions for the formation of 19a via int6a and int6b.
190
Scheme 6.15 Synthesis of tricyclic dilactam (19a) via int6a and int6b.
There are two mechanisms possible for the formation of tricyclic dilactam (19). One
possible mechanism is the formation of aldol product in the first step; the second step
is the formation of malonamide from the condensation of cyanoacetamide and the
third step is the cyclisation of these two intermediates to give the desired product.
Another possible mechanism is the formation of two different intermediates of
Knoevenagel condensation, which in turn rearranges C-C bond followed by [4+2]
cycloaddition. Subsequently, this undergoes intramolecular Michael-type addition
followed by the attack of aryl aldehyde via aldol condensation to give the desired
product. Thus, to investigate the exact mechanism, we carried out several reactions
under the same conditions. Initially we carried out a few reactions to synthesise aldol
product of NBP with benzaldehyde (int6a), condensation of cyanoacetamide (int6b),
two different Knoevenagel product of NBP with cyanoacetamide (int6c) and
benzaldehyde with cyanoacetamide (int6d) under the same condition.
Scheme 6.16. Several reactions for the formation of 19a via int6c, int6d and
int6e.
191
Scheme 6.17. Synthesis of tricyclic dilactam (19a) via int6c, int6d and int6e.
Finally, we carried out two reactions under the same condition. One was the reaction
between int6a and int6b; the other was between int6c and int6d. In the first reaction
we successfully got the expected product (19a), whereas, in the second reaction we
did not get the expected intermediate (int6e) which could be further reacted with
benzaldehyde to give the product (19a). This reaction schemes and their mechanisms
are represented in Scheme 6.14-6.15 and Scheme 6.16-6.17 respectively. Hence, from
these two reactions, we concluded that the mechanism for this reaction proceeded
only via aldol reaction/ condensation of cyanoacetamide followed by cyclisation and
in turn by dehydration. But, the mechanism for the formation of tetracyclic dilactam
discussed in the previous chapter proceeded in other way. This could be the major
reason for not getting fluorophore for the synthesised tricyclic dilactam (19).
192
Scheme 6.18. A most feasible mechanism for the formation of product (19a).
Most functionalities of the resulting tricyclo diamide products (19a) offer great
flexibility for further structural modifications and the synthesised products are indeed
lactam analogues that are directly useful for drug design in pharmaceutical sciences.
193
6.4 SPECTRAL DISCUSSION
Characterization of compound 19a was discussed as a representative compound of
this class of compounds 19a – 19n.
Figure 6.2: Structure of 2-benzylidene-4-benzyl-7-phenyl-4, 10, 11-triazatricyclo
[6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane-9, 12-dione (19a)
2-benzylidene-4-benzyl-7-phenyl-4, 10, 11-triazatricyclo [6.2.2.01, 6
] dodecane-9, 12-
dione (19a): White solid obtained by slow evaporation from ethanol and THF (1:1)
mixture. The yield and the melting point were 70 and > 300 ⁰C respectively. FT-IR
spectra of compound 19a, showed the absorption band at 3541 cm-1
representing one
of the amide N-H stretching. A band at 3309 cm-1
indicated another amide N-H
stretching. A band at 3045 cm-1
represented the aromatic C-H stretching. The
absorption band at 2870 cm-1
represented the aliphatic C-H stretching. A band at 1687
cm-1
confirmed the presences of C=O stretching (Spectra 6.1). 1H,
13C-NMR spectra,
DEPT-90 and DEPT-135 were recorded in 400 MHz Bruker using DMSO as solvent.
1H-NMR spectra of compound 19a showed peak at 1.19-1.23 ppm corresponding to
H1 and H2 proton. Peaks at 1.92-1.99 ppm showed singlet corresponding to H5 and H6
proton. Peaks at 2.14 and 2.76 ppm showed singlet corresponding to H3 and H4 proton
respectively. Peaks at 3.94 and 4.04 ppm showed singlet corresponding to H7 and
NBP’s CH2 proton respectively. The vinylic protons exhibited a singlet peak at 6.05
ppm. The other aromatic CH proton appeared at 6.98-7.49 ppm. Peak at 9.43 ppm
showed singlet corresponding to amide NH proton (Spectra 6.2). 13
C-NMR spectrum
of compound 19a showed peak at 26.36, 28.90, 49.68, 58.39 and 70.91 ppm
corresponding to aliphatic carbons. Peak at 126.48-137.32 ppm corresponded to
aromatic carbons. Peaks at 169.60 and 169.73 ppm indicated two amide carbonyl
194
carbons. (Spectra 6.3). To confirm the structural arrangements of the compound 2D-
NMR of DEPT-90, DEPT-135, mass and HRMS were recorded. DEPT-135 spectra of
compound 19a showed negative peaks at 26.39 and 28.92 corresponding to NBP’s
aliphatic CH2 carbons and positive peaks at 41.44, 49.69 and 58.40 ppm
corresponding to aliphatic CH carbons. Aromatic carbons showed positive peaks at
126.50-129.68 ppm (Spectra 6.4). DEPT-90 spectra of compound 19a had positive
peaks at 41.44, 49.69 and 58.40 ppm corresponding to aliphatic CH carbons, and
aromatic carbons showed positive peak at 126.50-129.68 ppm (Spectra 6.5). Thus,
this clearly shows that the arrangements of the structure would be tricyclic dilactam.
Mass (Spectra 6.7) and HRMS (Spectra 6.8) pattern of the compound 19a including
its fragmentation pattern it confirms the structure of the synthesised compound. The
structures of all the synthesised compounds (19a – 19n) were confirmed using FT-IR,
1H,
13C-NMR, Mass and HRMS analysis (Table 6.6) and the purity of the synthesised
compound was checked using HPLC.
19
5
Sp
ectra 6
.1: F
T-IR
of 2
-ben
zylid
ene-4
-ben
zyl-7
-ph
enyl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19a)
19
6
Sp
ectra 6
.2: 1H
– N
MR
of 2
-ben
zylid
ene-4
-ben
zyl-7
-ph
enyl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19
a)
19
7
Sp
ectra 6
.3: 1
3C –
NM
R o
f 2-b
enzy
liden
e-4-b
enzy
l-7-p
hen
yl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19a)
19
8
Sp
ectra 6
.4: D
EP
T-1
35 sp
ectra o
f 2-b
enzy
liden
e-4-b
enzy
l-7-p
hen
yl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19a)
19
9
Sp
ectra 6
.5: D
EP
T-9
0 sp
ectra o
f 2-b
enzy
liden
e-4-b
enzy
l-7-p
hen
yl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19a)
200
Spectra 6.6: HPLC data for compound (19a) in acetonitrile
20
1
Sp
ectra 6
.7: M
ass sp
ectra
of 2
-ben
zylid
ene-4
-ben
zyl-7
-ph
enyl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19a)
20
2
Sp
ectra 6
.8: H
RM
S sp
ectra
of 2
-ben
zylid
ene-4
-ben
zyl-7
-ph
enyl-4
, 10, 1
1-tria
zatricy
clo [6
.2.2
.01
, 6] dod
ecan
e-9, 1
2-d
ion
e (19a)
20
3
Tab
le 6.3
Sp
ectral D
ata
of co
mp
ou
nd
19a –
19n
Pro
du
ct
cod
e
FT
-IR
(cm-1)
Rf - T
LC
(EA
:
hex
ane)
1H-N
MR
(δ) in
pp
m
13C
-NM
R (δ
) in p
pm
HR
MS
M
P
(⁰C)
Ca
lcula
ted
Fo
un
d
19
a
35
41
,
33
09
,
30
45
,
28
70
,
16
87
0.6
7 (6
0%
)
1.1
9-1
.23
(dd
, CH
2 , 2H
), 1.9
2 (s, C
H, 1
H), 1
.99 (s,
CH
, 1H
), 2.4
1 (s, C
H2 , 1
H), 2
.76
(s, CH
2 , 1H
),
3.9
4
(s, C
H,
1H
), 4
.04
(s,
CH
2 , 2
H),
6.0
5
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 6
.98
-7.4
9
(ArH
, 1
5H
), 9
.43
(s,
am
ide N
H, 2
H)
26
.36
, 2
8.9
0,
49
.68
, 5
8.3
9,
70
.91
, 12
6.4
8,
12
7.6
8,
12
8.0
4,
12
8.9
5, 1
29
.08
, 12
9.6
6, 1
31
.50
,
13
3.3
5, 1
37
.32
169
.60
, 169.7
3
C2
9 H2
7 N3 O
2
([M]
+)
44
9.2
10
3
44
9.2
10
2
>3
00
19
b
35
82
,
32
97
,
30
89
,
28
30
,
16
98
0.4
7 (6
0%
)
2.1
3-2
.17
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.3
8-2
.42
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.7
0-2
.74
(d
, C
H,
1H
), 2
.97-2
.99
(m
, C
H,
1H
),
3.1
6-3
.20
(dd, C
H, 1
H), 3
.59 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.66
-
3.7
1 (m
, CH
2 , 2H
), 6.8
9 (s, v
inylic
-H, 1
H), 7
.03
-
9.1
2 (A
rH, 1
3H
), 7.8
0 (s, am
ide N
H, 2
H)
37
.40,
37
.45,
39.7
9,
50
.60
, 5
0.6
7,
54
.68, 5
7.7
3, 6
4.6
0, 1
14
.90
, 11
5.0
9,
11
5.8
0,
12
4.5
4,
126
.01
, 12
6.4
4,
12
7.5
5,
12
8.9
9,
129
.86
, 13
0.2
8,
13
8.8
4,
14
1.5
7,
158
.94
, 16
0.8
2,
16
1.4
7, 1
63
.35
, 17
9.2
1
C2
9 H2
5 F2 N
3 O2
([M]
+)
48
5.1
91
5
48
5.1
91
4
>3
00
19
c
35
01
,
32
87
,
29
92
,
28
04
,
16
81
0.4
9 (6
0%
)
2.1
5-2
.19
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.3
5-2
.39
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.6
8-2
.72
(d
, C
H,
1H
), 3
.01-3
.03
(m
, C
H,
1H
),
3.1
3-3
.17
(dd, C
H, 1
H), 3
.61 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.64
-
3.6
9 (m
, CH
2 , 2H
), 6.6
2 (s, v
inylic
-H, 1
H), 6
.93
-
7.4
1 (A
rH, 1
3H
), 7.9
1 (s, am
ide N
H, 2
H)
39
.81,
42
.09,
50.6
8,
54
.72
, 5
7.7
8,
64
.52,
11
3.0
3,
113
.93,
11
4.3
3,
11
7.2
2,
12
5.0
3,
127
.55
, 12
8.8
1,
13
4.3
5,
14
0.0
3,
143
.29
, 16
0.3
9,
16
1.9
2, 1
62
.91
, 16
4.4
3, 1
74.5
1
C2
9 H2
5 F2 N
3 O2
([M]
+)
48
5.1
91
5
48
5.1
91
5
>3
00
20
4
19
d
34
92
,
33
13
,
30
33
,
28
63
,
16
48
0.5
7 (6
0%
)
1.9
2-1
.94
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.0
6-2
.10
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.3
9-2
.43
(dd
, CH
, 1H
), 2.8
0-2
.82
(m, C
H, 1
H),
3.2
1-3
.25
(dd, C
H, 1
H), 3
.69 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.75
-
3.8
0 (m
, CH
2 , 2H
), 6.7
3 (s, v
inylic
-H, 1
H), 7
.11
-
7.7
4 (A
rH, 1
3H
), 8.0
1 (s, am
ide N
H, 2
H)
38
.73,
40
.91,
49.1
8,
52
.85
, 5
6.9
3,
65
.48,
11
4.7
4,
115
.12,
12
6.9
6,
12
7.8
7,
12
8.3
1,
129
.97
, 13
1.3
2,
13
3.2
9,
13
7.6
6,
140
.31
, 16
0.7
3,
16
1.8
2, 1
62
.81
, 16
4.7
3, 1
75.7
8
C2
9 H2
5 F2 N
3 O2
([M]
+)
48
5.1
91
5
48
5.1
91
3
>3
00
19
e
35
48
,
33
01
,
30
96
,
28
78
,
16
99
0.5
2 (6
0%
)
2.0
1-2
.05
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.2
6-2
.30
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.4
6 (s, C
H3 , 3
H) 2
.63
-2.6
7 (m
, C
H, 1
H), 2
.84
-
2.8
6 (d
, CH
, 1H
), 3.0
8-3
.12
(dd
, CH
, 1H
), 3.4
3 (s,
CH
2 , 2
H),
3.8
2-3
.87
(m
, C
H2 ,
2H
), 6
.98
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 6
.95
-7.2
7
(ArH
, 1
3H
), 8
.21
(s,
am
ide N
H, 2
H)
19
.32,
19
.60,
38.0
1,
39
.67
, 5
0.5
4,
54
.74, 5
7.8
1, 6
4.8
2, 1
24
.35
, 12
6.3
2,
12
6.3
5,
12
7.1
6,
128
.89
, 12
9.8
9,
13
0.2
9,
13
3.6
4,
134
.43
, 13
5.4
4,
13
6.4
4, 1
40
.07
, 14
1.7
2, 1
78.6
5
C3
1 H3
1 N3 O
2
([M]
+)
47
7.2
41
6
47
7.2
41
6
>3
00
19
f
35
91
,
32
84
,
30
02
,
28
12
,
16
74
0.8
3 (6
0%
)
2.1
0-2
.14
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.2
9-2
.33
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.4
4 (s, C
H3 , 3
H) 2
.65
-2.6
9 (m
, C
H, 1
H), 2
.89
-
2.9
2 (d
, CH
, 1H
), 3.1
2-3
.16
(dd
, CH
, 1H
), 3.4
9 (s,
CH
2 , 2
H),
3.8
5-3
.89
(m
, C
H2 ,
2H
), 6
.82
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 6
.97
-7.5
4
(ArH
, 1
3H
), 8
.07
(s,
am
ide N
H, 2
H)
20
.78,
39
.81,
42.0
8,
50
.67
, 5
4.8
8,
57
.92,
66
.84
, 1
25
.81,
12
6.6
1,
12
6.7
4,
12
7.7
2,
128
.31
, 12
9.7
0,
13
4.2
8,
139
.83
, 1
41
.74,
14
3.3
8,
17
9.0
4
C3
1 H3
1 N3 O
2
([M]
+)
47
7.2
41
6
47
7.2
41
5
>3
00
19
g
35
56
,
30
67
,
28
89
,
16
97
0.7
8 (6
0%
)
1.9
5 -2
.00
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.1
8-2
.22
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.3
5 (s, C
H3 , 3
H) 2
.57
-2.6
0 (d
, CH
, 1H
), 2.7
9-2
.82
(m,
CH
, 1
H),
3.0
0-3
.04
(d
d,
CH
, 1
H),
3.2
9 (s,
CH
2 , 2
H),
3.7
8-3
.82
(m
, C
H2 ,
2H
), 6
.54
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 7
.00
-7
.29
(A
rH,
13
H),
8.0
1 (s,
21
.28,
34
.83,
40.3
8,
49
.78
, 5
2.9
4,
58
.93,
68
.14
, 1
26
.78,
12
7.8
3,
12
8.7
4,
12
8.9
3,
129
.13
, 13
3.6
8,
13
9.2
9, 1
40
.38
, 17
9.8
7
C3
1 H3
1 N3 O
2
([M]
+)
47
7.2
41
6
47
7.2
41
3
>3
00
20
5
am
ide N
H, 2
H)
19
h
35
62
,
33
72
,
30
64
,
28
41
,
16
72
0.3
8 (6
0%
)
1.8
2-1
.86
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.0
1-2
.05
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.4
5-2
.47
(d
, C
H,
1H
), 2
.83
-2.8
7 (d
d,
CH
, 1
H),
3.0
4-3
.06
(m, C
H, 1
H), 3
.64
(s, CH
2 , 2H
), 3.7
2-
3.7
6 (m
, CH
2 , 2H
), 6.9
3 (s, v
inylic
-H, 1
H), 7
.07
-
7.3
1 (A
rH, 1
3H
), 8.5
6 (s, am
ide N
H, 2
H)
32
.45,
38
.94,
49.5
1,
55
.82
, 5
8.1
9,
68
.02,
12
5.4
7,
125
.75,
12
6.0
4,
12
6.4
2,
1
27
.71,
12
8.5
3,
12
9.3
1,
13
0.2
6,
13
1.9
2,
134
.04
, 13
9.1
4,
14
0.5
4, 1
40
.46
, 17
2.6
5
C2
9 H2
5 Cl2 N
3 O2
([M]
+)
51
7.1
32
4
51
7.1
32
4
>3
00
19
i
35
93
,
32
84
,
30
94
,
29
15
,
16
79
0.4
2 (6
0%
)
1.9
7-2
.01
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.1
7-2
.21
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.4
8-2
.50
(d
, C
H,
1H
), 2
.92
-2.9
6 (d
d,
CH
, 1
H),
3.2
0-3
.23
(m, C
H, 1
H), 3
.59
(s, CH
2 , 2H
), 3.7
8-
3.8
3 (C
H2 , 2
H), 6
.53
(s, vin
ylic
-H, 1
H), 7
.12
-7.4
1
(ArH
, 13
H), 8
.48
(s, amid
e NH
, 2H
)
31
.14,
37
.38,
50.4
5,
53
.48
, 5
8.4
4,
66
.95,
12
5.0
3,
125
.67,
12
6.1
2,
12
6.7
9,
1
27
.83,
12
8.3
2,
12
9.8
5,
13
0.8
6,
13
1.8
4,
134
.25
, 13
9.3
7,
14
0.7
8, 1
40
.93
, 17
8.8
3
C2
9 H2
5 Cl2 N
3 O2
([M]
+)
51
7.1
32
4
51
7.1
32
5
>3
00
19
j
34
71
,
32
93
,
29
87
,
27
60
,
16
88
0.4
0 (6
0%
)
2.0
8-2
.12
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.1
9-2
.23
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.3
9-2
.42
(d
, C
H,
1H
), 2
.89
-2.9
2 (d
d,
CH
, 1
H),
3.3
9-3
.42
(CH
, 1H
), 3.5
3 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.71
-3.7
4
(m,
CH
2 , 2
H),
3.8
9
(s, O
CH
3 , 3
H),
6.4
7
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 7
.10
-7
.39
(A
rH,
13
H),
8.3
4 (s,
am
ide N
H, 2
H)
29
.23,
35
.19,
48.8
2,
51
.52
, 5
2.8
4,
56
.13,
62
.84
, 1
24
.93,
12
5.7
3,
12
6.0
3,
126
.85
,
12
7.6
1,
12
8.5
9,
12
9.4
3,
13
0.6
9,
131
.74
, 13
4.9
2,
13
9.6
4, 1
40
.92
, 14
0.9
9, 1
79
.31
C3
1 H3
1 N3 O
4
([M]
+)
50
9.2
31
5
50
9.2
31
4
>3
00
19
k
35
45
,
30
05
,
28
64
,
0.4
9 (6
0%
)
2.1
2-2
.16
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.2
1-2
.25
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.4
8-2
.52
(d
d,
CH
, 1
H),
2.9
2-2
.95
(d
, C
H,
1H
),
3.4
3-3
.46
(CH
, 1H
), 3.6
8 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.82
-3.8
6
(m,
CH
2 , 2
H),
3.9
9
(s, O
CH
3 , 3
H),
6.6
1
(s,
30
.48,
32
.58,
50.3
4,
52
.38
, 5
4.8
2,
57
.48,
63
.52
, 1
25
.01,
12
5.8
4,
12
6.6
6,
126
.92
,
12
7.9
6,
12
8.2
9,
12
9.4
4,
13
0.9
4,
131
.84
, 13
4.4
2,
C3
1 H3
1 N3 O
4
([M]
+)
50
9.2
31
5
50
9.2
31
6
>3
00
20
6
16
91
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 7
.14
-7
.48
(A
rH,
13
H),
8.0
6 (s,
CO
NH
, 2H
)
13
8.9
9, 1
39
.94
, 14
0.4
6, 1
78
.43
19
l
35
33
,
33
03
,
30
29
,
28
60
,
16
63
0.5
9 (6
0%
)
1.3
3-1
.35
(t,
CH
3 , 3
H),
1.4
2-1
.44
(t,
CH
3 , 3
H),
2.1
2-2
.17
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.2
9-2
.32
(s, CH
, 1H
),
2.3
8-2
.43
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.5
5-2
.58
(s, CH
, 1H
),
2.7
0-2
.81
(m, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.27
-3.2
9 (d
, CH
, 1H
),
3.5
4 (s, C
H, 1
H), 3
.59
(s, CH
2 , 2H
), 3.6
8-3
.70
(d,
CH
, 1H
), 4.0
6-4
.10
(q, O
CH
2 , 2H
), 4.1
5-4
.19
(q,
OC
H2 ,
2H
), 6
.89
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 6
.70
-7
.67
(ArH
, 13
H), 7
.82
(s, CO
NH
, 2H
)
14
.54,
32
.83,
35.5
4,
51
.75
, 5
4.8
1,
55
.63, 5
8.3
4, 6
3.2
4, 6
4.8
6, 1
15
.56,
11
6.6
2,
12
2.5
4,
123
.98
, 12
7.6
7,
12
8.6
4,
13
1.7
2,
133
.01
, 14
0.6
3,
15
7.8
4, 1
59
.64
, 16
2.8
4, 1
83.9
5
C3
3 H3
5 N3 O
4
([M]
+)
53
7.2
62
8
53
7.2
62
9
>3
00
19
m
35
91
,
33
24
,
30
61
,
28
82
,
16
95
0.6
1 (6
0%
)
1.3
5-1
.39
(m, C
H3 , 6
H), 2
.13
-2.1
7 (d
d, C
H2 , 1
H),
2.3
8-2
.39
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.4
1-2
.42
(d, C
H2 , 1
H),
2.7
0-2
.74
(m, C
H, 1
H), 2
.97-3
.03
(dd
, CH
, 1H
),
3.1
6-3
.20
(dd, C
H, 1
H), 3
.59 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.65
-
3.7
0 ( C
H2 , 2
H), 4
.03
-4.0
7 (q
, OC
H2 , 4
H), 6
.73
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 6
.85
-7
.65
(A
rH,
13
H),
7.9
0 (s,
CO
NH
, 2H
)
14
.78,
36
.19,
41.8
4,
50
.91
, 5
4.4
9,
55
.95, 6
3.3
2, 6
4.5
7, 1
14
.95
, 11
5.0
1,
12
6.4
9,
12
7.2
3,
127
.85
, 12
8.5
1,
13
1.8
1,
13
3.9
5,
140
.01
, 15
8.7
8,
15
9.0
4, 1
84
.92
C3
3 H3
5 N3 O
4
([M]
+)
53
7.2
62
8
53
7.2
63
0
>3
00
19
n
35
45
,
33
13
,
30
56
,
28
10
,
16
53
0.6
4 (6
0%
)
2.3
1-2
.35
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
), 2.4
7-2
.51
(dd
, CH
2 , 1H
),
2.6
3-2
.65
(d
, C
H2 ,
1H
), 2.7
8-2
.83
(m
, C
H,
1H
),
3.0
3-3
.07
(dd, C
H, 1
H), 3
.25
-3.2
9 (d
d, C
H, 1
H),
3.7
7 (s, C
H2 , 2
H), 3
.82
-3.8
4 ( C
H2 , 2
H), 6
.62
(s,
vin
ylic
-H,
1H
), 7
.25
-8
.09
(A
rH,
19
H),
8.0
1 (s,
CO
NH
, 2H
)
34
.82,
39
.95,
48.4
9,
52
.81
, 5
6.8
4,
65
.74,
12
5.9
2,
126
.21,
12
6.8
4,
12
7.2
9,
12
8.0
4,
128
.51
, 12
9.1
5,
13
0.9
5,
13
2.9
5,
133
.67
, 13
3.9
5,
13
7.1
2, 1
40
.03
, 14
1.2
9, 1
83.5
3
C3
7 H3
1 N3 O
2
([M]
+)
54
9.2
41
6
54
9.2
41
8
>3
00
207
6.5 CONCLUSION
Herein, for the first time, we report the synthesis of new series of
multifunctionalized triazatricyclo [6, 2, 2, 0 1, 6
] dodecane derivatives via a
domino reaction using sodium hydroxide as catalyst.
A wide range of easily available chemicals namely N-benzyl-4-piperidone,
aryl aldehyde and cyanoacetamide were employed as substrates, and the
reaction provided several advantages such as use of readily available
precursor, consumption of less energy, short reaction time, moderate to good
yield and convenient work up.
The mechanisms for these reactions were proposed, and mechanistic studies
were performed experimentally to investigate the exact mechanism involved
in this reaction. The mechanistic studies specified that the proposed
mechanism proceeded only via aldol condensation (between NBP and aryl
aldehyde), Knoevenagel condensation (between cyanoacetamide), which was
followed by the cyclisation and dehydration to form the desired product.
The synthesised tricyclo dilactam derivatives afford enormous flexibility for
additional structural alterations and the synthesized tricyclo dilactam
derivatives are indeed lactam analogues which are directly useful in medicinal
and pharmaceutical chemistry.
Four stereogenic centres with two quaternary carbon-amino functions were
obtained. Such observations are very rare in organic chemistry.
208
6.6 EXPERIMENTAL DISCUSSION
Chemicals were purchased from Aldrich and they were used without further
purification. TLC -Thin layer chromatography (Merck, Silica gel 60 F254) - was
performed on pre-coated silica gel on alumina plates for monitoring the reaction. FT-
IR spectra were recorded in the range of 4000-400cm-1
on JASCO-4100 spectrometer
instrument using KBr pellets. 1H,
13C NMR spectra, DEPT-90 and DEPT-135 were
recorded using a BRUKER AMX 400 FT. HPLC was performed on a water’s liquid
chromatography equipped with a dual wavelength UV detector (Deuterium lamp,
192–600 nm), using a symmetry C18 column (10 cm X 4.6mm) 5µ HPLC grade.
Mass Spectroscopy – ESI, Triple quad (Waters Quattro premier XE) was used to
analyse the ESI mass. HRMS analysis was obtained from JEOL GC Mate.
6.6.1 GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF 1-((4-METHOXY
PHENYLTHIO) (PHENYL) METHYL) PYRROLIDIN-2-ONES (19a – 19n)
A dry 100ml Erlenmeyer flask was charged with N-benzyl-4-piperidone (10 mmol);
aromatic aldehydes (20 mmol); cyanoacetamide (20 mmol); sodium hydroxide (0.5
mol %) and methanol (15 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 30-60 min. The reaction was monitored by TLC and after the completion of
reaction, the mixture was neutralised using 0.1 N HCl and extracted with DCM (3 X
20 ml). The crude reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography on silica
gel using ethyl acetate/hexane as the eluents.