Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation TheoryHypergeometric summation Harmonic...
Transcript of Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation TheoryHypergeometric summation Harmonic...
Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders inPerturbation Theory
Sven-Olaf [email protected]
DESY, Zeuthen
————————————————————————————————————–
– Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics (ACAT 2005), DESY, Zeuthen, May 26, 2005 –
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.1
Introduction
TaskGiven expression g(n) (depending on n) find expression f(n), suchthat
f(n) =
nX
i=0
g(i)
Summation algorithmsPolynomial summationHypergeometric summationHarmonic summationBeyond
Examples in particle physics
Summary
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.2
Introduction
TaskGiven expression g(n) (depending on n) find expression f(n), suchthat
f(n) =
nX
i=0
g(i)
Summation algorithmsPolynomial summationHypergeometric summationHarmonic summationBeyond
Examples in particle physics
Summary
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.2
Introduction
TaskGiven expression g(n) (depending on n) find expression f(n), suchthat
f(n) =
nX
i=0
g(i)
Summation algorithmsPolynomial summationHypergeometric summationHarmonic summationBeyond
Examples in particle physics
Summary
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.2
Introduction
TaskGiven expression g(n) (depending on n) find expression f(n), suchthat
f(n) =
nX
i=0
g(i)
Summation algorithmsPolynomial summationHypergeometric summationHarmonic summationBeyond
Examples in particle physics
Summary
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.2
Polynomial summation
Examples
Polynomials
n−1X
i=0
i =1
2n(n− 1)
n−1X
i=0
i2 =
1
6n(n− 1)(2n− 1)
n−1X
i=0
i3 =
1
4n
2(n− 1)2
n−1X
i=0
i4 =
1
30n(n− 1)(2n− 1)(3n
2− 3n− 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.3
Difference opDifference operator
Introduce operator ∆ with (∆f)(n) = f(n + 1)− f(n)
Symbolic summation problem (cf. symbolic integration)g = (∆f) with f = (
P
g), operator ∆ is left inverse ∆(P
f) = f
Differential operator D acts in continuum as D(xm) = mxm−1
Discrete analog ∆ on polynomials? E.g. ∆(n3) = 3n2 + 3n− 1
Rising and falling factorialsDefine rising factorials as fm = f(x)f(x + 1) . . . f(x + m− 1)
(also known as Pochhammer symbols (x)m )
Define falling factorials as fm = f(x)f(x− 1) . . . f(x−m + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.4
Difference opDifference operator
Introduce operator ∆ with (∆f)(n) = f(n + 1)− f(n)
Symbolic summation problem (cf. symbolic integration)g = (∆f) with f = (
P
g), operator ∆ is left inverse ∆(P
f) = f
Differential operator D acts in continuum as D(xm) = mxm−1
Discrete analog ∆ on polynomials? E.g. ∆(n3) = 3n2 + 3n− 1
Rising and falling factorialsDefine rising factorials as fm = f(x)f(x + 1) . . . f(x + m− 1)
(also known as Pochhammer symbols (x)m )
Define falling factorials as fm = f(x)f(x− 1) . . . f(x−m + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.4
Difference opDifference operator
Introduce operator ∆ with (∆f)(n) = f(n + 1)− f(n)
Symbolic summation problem (cf. symbolic integration)g = (∆f) with f = (
P
g), operator ∆ is left inverse ∆(P
f) = f
Differential operator D acts in continuum as D(xm) = mxm−1
Discrete analog ∆ on polynomials? E.g. ∆(n3) = 3n2 + 3n− 1
Rising and falling factorialsDefine rising factorials as fm = f(x)f(x + 1) . . . f(x + m− 1)
(also known as Pochhammer symbols (x)m )
Define falling factorials as fm = f(x)f(x− 1) . . . f(x−m + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.4
Difference opDifference operator
Introduce operator ∆ with (∆f)(n) = f(n + 1)− f(n)
Symbolic summation problem (cf. symbolic integration)g = (∆f) with f = (
P
g), operator ∆ is left inverse ∆(P
f) = f
Differential operator D acts in continuum as D(xm) = mxm−1
Discrete analog ∆ on polynomials? E.g. ∆(n3) = 3n2 + 3n− 1
Rising and falling factorialsDefine rising factorials as fm = f(x)f(x + 1) . . . f(x + m− 1)
(also known as Pochhammer symbols (x)m )
Define falling factorials as fm = f(x)f(x− 1) . . . f(x−m + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.4
RiseFall FacThen, with falling factorials
∆(xm) = mxm−1
n−1X
i=0
im =
1
m + 1n
m+1
Conversion of polynomial powers xm
(decomposition with Stirling numbers of second kind
(
m
i
)
)
xm =
mX
i=0
(
m
i
)
xi
Stirling numbers of second kind denote # of ways to partition n
things in k non-empty sets
Examples
n−1X
i=0
i =
n−1X
i=0
i1 =
1
2n
2 =1
2n(n− 1)
n−1X
i=0
i2 =
n−1X
i=0
(i2 + i1) =
1
3n
3 +1
2n
2 =1
6n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.5
RiseFall FacThen, with falling factorials
∆(xm) = mxm−1
n−1X
i=0
im =
1
m + 1n
m+1
Conversion of polynomial powers xm
(decomposition with Stirling numbers of second kind
(
m
i
)
)
xm =
mX
i=0
(
m
i
)
xi
Stirling numbers of second kind denote # of ways to partition n
things in k non-empty sets
Examples
n−1X
i=0
i =
n−1X
i=0
i1 =
1
2n
2 =1
2n(n− 1)
n−1X
i=0
i2 =
n−1X
i=0
(i2 + i1) =
1
3n
3 +1
2n
2 =1
6n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.5
RiseFall FacThen, with falling factorials
∆(xm) = mxm−1
n−1X
i=0
im =
1
m + 1n
m+1
Conversion of polynomial powers xm
(decomposition with Stirling numbers of second kind
(
m
i
)
)
xm =
mX
i=0
(
m
i
)
xi
Stirling numbers of second kind denote # of ways to partition n
things in k non-empty sets
Examples
n−1X
i=0
i =
n−1X
i=0
i1 =
1
2n
2 =1
2n(n− 1)
n−1X
i=0
i2 =
n−1X
i=0
(i2 + i1) =
1
3n
3 +1
2n
2 =1
6n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.5
Hypergeometric summation
Definition
Hypergeometric function mFn
mFn
a1, . . . , am
b1, . . . , bn
˛
˛
˛
˛
z
!
=X
i≥0
ai1 . . . ai
m
bi1 . . . bi
n
zi
i!
Examples
0F0
„˛
˛
˛
˛
z
«
=X
i≥0
zi
i!= ez
2F1
a, 1
1
˛
˛
˛
˛
z
!
=X
i≥0
ai zi
i!=
1
(1− z)a
2F1
1, 1
2
˛
˛
˛
˛
z
!
= zX
i≥0
1i1i
2i
zi
i!= − ln(1− z)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.6
Hypergeometric summation
Definition
Hypergeometric function mFn
mFn
a1, . . . , am
b1, . . . , bn
˛
˛
˛
˛
z
!
=X
i≥0
ai1 . . . ai
m
bi1 . . . bi
n
zi
i!
Examples
0F0
„˛
˛
˛
˛
z
«
=X
i≥0
zi
i!= ez
2F1
a, 1
1
˛
˛
˛
˛
z
!
=X
i≥0
ai zi
i!=
1
(1− z)a
2F1
1, 1
2
˛
˛
˛
˛
z
!
= zX
i≥0
1i1i
2i
zi
i!= − ln(1− z)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.6
RatiosRatios
A term gn is hypergeometric, if the ratio r(n) of two consecutive termsis a rational function of n.
r(n) =gn+1
gn
Example: binomial coefficient
m
n + 1
!
m
n
! =Γ(m + 1)Γ(n + 1)Γ(m− n + 1)
Γ(n + 2)Γ(m− n)Γ(m)=−n + m
n + 1
Given a hypergeometric term g, is there hypergeometric term f suchthat ∆f = g?
fn+1 − fn = gn
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.7
RatiosRatios
A term gn is hypergeometric, if the ratio r(n) of two consecutive termsis a rational function of n.
r(n) =gn+1
gn
Example: binomial coefficient
m
n + 1
!
m
n
! =Γ(m + 1)Γ(n + 1)Γ(m− n + 1)
Γ(n + 2)Γ(m− n)Γ(m)=−n + m
n + 1
Given a hypergeometric term g, is there hypergeometric term f suchthat ∆f = g?
fn+1 − fn = gn
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.7
RatiosRatios
A term gn is hypergeometric, if the ratio r(n) of two consecutive termsis a rational function of n.
r(n) =gn+1
gn
Example: binomial coefficient
m
n + 1
!
m
n
! =Γ(m + 1)Γ(n + 1)Γ(m− n + 1)
Γ(n + 2)Γ(m− n)Γ(m)=−n + m
n + 1
Given a hypergeometric term g, is there hypergeometric term f suchthat ∆f = g?
fn+1 − fn = gn
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.7
Gosper/WZGospers algorithm
Gospers algorithm for indefinite hypergeometric summationdetermines fn from a given recursion
fn = fn−1 + gn−1 = fn−2 + gn−1 + gn−2 = · · · = f0 +
n−1X
k=0
gk
Idea: recursive algorithm; telescoping
Wilf-Zeilberger algorithm
WZ algorithmdefinite hypergeometric summationIdea: telescoping
Definite vs. indefinite summation
ExamplesX
k
n
k
!
=X
k
n
k
!
nX
k=0
n
k
!
= 2n
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.8
Gosper/WZGospers algorithm
Gospers algorithm for indefinite hypergeometric summationdetermines fn from a given recursion
fn = fn−1 + gn−1 = fn−2 + gn−1 + gn−2 = · · · = f0 +
n−1X
k=0
gk
Idea: recursive algorithm; telescoping
Wilf-Zeilberger algorithm
WZ algorithmdefinite hypergeometric summationIdea: telescoping
Definite vs. indefinite summation
ExamplesX
k
n
k
!
=X
k
n
k
!
nX
k=0
n
k
!
= 2n
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.8
Gosper/WZGospers algorithm
Gospers algorithm for indefinite hypergeometric summationdetermines fn from a given recursion
fn = fn−1 + gn−1 = fn−2 + gn−1 + gn−2 = · · · = f0 +
n−1X
k=0
gk
Idea: recursive algorithm; telescoping
Wilf-Zeilberger algorithm
WZ algorithmdefinite hypergeometric summationIdea: telescoping
Definite vs. indefinite summation
ExamplesX
k
n
k
!
=X
k
n
k
!
nX
k=0
n
k
!
= 2n
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.8
Harmonic summation
Harmonic sums Sm1,...,mk(n)
Gonzalez-Arroyo, Lopez, Ynduráin ‘79; Vermaseren ‘98; Blümlein, Kurth ‘98;
S.M., Uwer, Weinzierl ‘01; Blümlein ‘03
recursive definition S±m1,...,mk(n) =
nX
i=1
(±1)i
im1Sm2,...,mk
(i)
Particle physicsdimensional regularization D = 4− 2ε requires expansion of theGamma-function around positive integers values (n ≥ 0)
Γ(n + 1 + ε)
Γ(1 + ε)= Γ(n + 1) exp
−
∞X
k=1
εk (−1)k)
kSk(n)
!
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.9
Harmonic summation
Harmonic sums Sm1,...,mk(n)
Gonzalez-Arroyo, Lopez, Ynduráin ‘79; Vermaseren ‘98; Blümlein, Kurth ‘98;
S.M., Uwer, Weinzierl ‘01; Blümlein ‘03
recursive definition S±m1,...,mk(n) =
nX
i=1
(±1)i
im1Sm2,...,mk
(i)
Particle physicsdimensional regularization D = 4− 2ε requires expansion of theGamma-function around positive integers values (n ≥ 0)
Γ(n + 1 + ε)
Γ(1 + ε)= Γ(n + 1) exp
−
∞X
k=1
εk (−1)k)
kSk(n)
!
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.9
Algorithms 1Algorithms for harmonic sums
Multiplication (Hopf algebra)basic formula (recursion)
Sm1,...,mk(n)× Sm′
1,...,m′
l
(n) =
nX
j1=1
1
jm1
1
Sm2,...,mk(j1)Sm′
1,...,m′
l
(j1)
+nX
j2=1
1
jm′
1
2
Sm1,...,mk(j2)Sm′
2,...,m′
l
(j2)
−
nX
j=1
1
jm1+m′
1
Sm2,...,mk(j)Sm′
2,...,m′
l
(j)
Proof uses decomposition
nX
i=1
nX
j=1
aij =
nX
i=1
iX
j=1
aij +
nX
j=1
jX
i=1
aij −
nX
i=1
aii
-
6
j1
j2
=
-
6
j1
j2
+
-
6
j1
j2
−
-
6
j1
j2
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.10
Algorithms 2Algorithms for harmonic sums (cont’d)
Convolution (sum over n− j and j)
n−1X
j=1
1
jm1Sm2,...,mk
(j)1
(n− j)n1Sn2,...,nl
(n− j)
Conjugation
−
nX
j=1
n
j
!
(−1)j1
jm1Sm2,...,mk
(j)
Binomial convolution (sum over binomial, n− j and j)
−
n−1X
j=1
n
j
!
(−1)j1
jm1Sm2,...,mk
(j)1
(n− j)n1Sn2,...,nl
(n− j)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.11
Beyond
Generalized sums S(n; m1, ..., mk; x1, ..., xk)
recursive definition
S(n; m1, ..., mk; x1, ..., xk) =
nX
i=1
xi1
im1S(i;m2, ..., mk; x2, ..., xk)
multiple scales x1, ..., xk
depth k, weight w = m1 + ... + mk
Example
Powers of logarithm ln(1− x)
∞X
j=1
xj
j!Γ(j − ε) =
∞X
j=1
xj
j− ε
∞X
j=1
xj
jS1(j − 1) + ε
2. . .
= − ln(1− x) − ε1
2ln(1− x)2 + ε
2. . .
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.12
Harmonic polylogarithmsHarmonic polylogarithms
Harmonic polylogarithms Hm1,...,mk(x)
Goncharov ‘98; Borwein, Bradley,Broadhurst, Lisonek ‘99; Remiddi, Vermaseren ‘99
physical quantities in momentum (x)-space (single scale)
basic functions of lowest weightH0(x) = ln x , H1(x) = − ln(1− x) , H−1(x) = ln(1 + x)
higher functions defined by recursion
Hm1,...,mw(x) =
Z x
0dz fm1(z) Hm2,...,mw
(z)
f0(x) =1
x, f1(x) =
1
1− x, f−1(x) =
1
1 + x
Harmonic polylogarithms related to generalized sumsS(∞; m1, ..., mk; x1, ..., xk)
(Inverse) Mellin transformation
f̃(N) =
Z 1
0dx x
Nf(x)
unique mappingHm1,...,mw
(x)
(1± x)←→ Sn1,...,nw+1(N)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.13
Harmonic polylogarithmsHarmonic polylogarithms
Harmonic polylogarithms Hm1,...,mk(x)
Goncharov ‘98; Borwein, Bradley,Broadhurst, Lisonek ‘99; Remiddi, Vermaseren ‘99
physical quantities in momentum (x)-space (single scale)basic functions of lowest weightH0(x) = ln x , H1(x) = − ln(1− x) , H−1(x) = ln(1 + x)
higher functions defined by recursion
Hm1,...,mw(x) =
Z x
0dz fm1(z) Hm2,...,mw
(z)
f0(x) =1
x, f1(x) =
1
1− x, f−1(x) =
1
1 + x
Harmonic polylogarithms related to generalized sumsS(∞; m1, ..., mk; x1, ..., xk)
(Inverse) Mellin transformation
f̃(N) =
Z 1
0dx x
Nf(x)
unique mappingHm1,...,mw
(x)
(1± x)←→ Sn1,...,nw+1(N)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.13
Harmonic polylogarithmsHarmonic polylogarithms
Harmonic polylogarithms Hm1,...,mk(x)
Goncharov ‘98; Borwein, Bradley,Broadhurst, Lisonek ‘99; Remiddi, Vermaseren ‘99
physical quantities in momentum (x)-space (single scale)basic functions of lowest weightH0(x) = ln x , H1(x) = − ln(1− x) , H−1(x) = ln(1 + x)
higher functions defined by recursion
Hm1,...,mw(x) =
Z x
0dz fm1(z) Hm2,...,mw
(z)
f0(x) =1
x, f1(x) =
1
1− x, f−1(x) =
1
1 + x
Harmonic polylogarithms related to generalized sumsS(∞; m1, ..., mk; x1, ..., xk)
(Inverse) Mellin transformation
f̃(N) =
Z 1
0dx x
Nf(x)
unique mappingHm1,...,mw
(x)
(1± x)←→ Sn1,...,nw+1(N)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.13
Algorithms beyondAlgorithms for nested sums
Same structures as for harmonic sums, in particularmultiplication
S(n; m1, ...; x1, ...) × S(n; m′1, ...; x′
1, ...)
convolutionconjugationbinomial convolution
Recursive algorithms analogous to harmonic sums solve multiplenested sums
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.14
Higher transcendental functionsHigher transcendental functions
Expansion of higher transcendental functions in small parameterexpansion parameter ε occurs in the rising factorials(Pochhammer symbols)
Hypergeometric function
2F1(a, b; c, x0) =
∞X
i=0
aibi
ci
xi0
i!
First Appell function
F1(a, b1, b2; c; x1, x2) =∞X
m1=0
∞X
m2=0
am1+m2bm1
1 bm2
2
cm1+m2
xm1
1
m1!
xm2
2
m2!
Second Appell function
F2(a, b1, b2; c1, c2; x1, x2) =∞X
m1=0
∞X
m2=0
am1+m2bm1
1 bm2
2
cm1
1 cm2
2
xm1
1
m1!
xm2
2
m2!
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.15
Examples in particle physics
Feynman integralsScalar diagram withexternal momenta P and Q;Four-point function withunderlying ladder topology
=
Z 3Y
n
dD
ln1
(P − l1)21
l21 . . . l28
N -th moment:coefficient of (2P ·Q)N
=(2P ·Q)N
(Q2)N+α
CN
Taylor expansion1
(P − l1)2=X
i
(2P · l1)i
(l21)i+1−→
(2P · l1)N
(l21)N
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.16
Examples in particle physics
Feynman integralsScalar diagram withexternal momenta P and Q;Four-point function withunderlying ladder topology
=
Z 3Y
n
dD
ln1
(P − l1)21
l21 . . . l28
N -th moment:coefficient of (2P ·Q)N
=(2P ·Q)N
(Q2)N+α
CN
Taylor expansion1
(P − l1)2=X
i
(2P · l1)i
(l21)i+1−→
(2P · l1)N
(l21)N
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.16
Examples in particle physics
Feynman integralsScalar diagram withexternal momenta P and Q;Four-point function withunderlying ladder topology
=
Z 3Y
n
dD
ln1
(P − l1)21
l21 . . . l28
N -th moment:coefficient of (2P ·Q)N
=(2P ·Q)N
(Q2)N+α
CN
Taylor expansion1
(P − l1)2=X
i
(2P · l1)i
(l21)i+1−→
(2P · l1)N
(l21)N
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.16
Difference eqDifference equations
Single-step difference equation in N
extremely simple example1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
= −
N+3+3εN+2
2 p ·qq2
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
+2
N+2
1
1
1 1
1
1 2
1 1
Formal equation , formal solution , input to solution
I(N) = −N+3+3ε
N+2I(N− 1) +
2
N+2G(N)I(N) = (−1)N
QNj=1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=1(j+2)I(0) + (−1)N
NX
i=1
(−1)jQN
j=i+1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=i(j+2)G(i)
I(0) = −2
3
1
ε2+
23
3
1
ε− 42
G(i) =(−1)i
ε22
3
„
S1(i+2)
i+2−
S1,2(i)
2−
S2(i+1)
2(i+1)− S2(i)−
1
(i+1)2−
1
(i+2)2
«
+ . . .
Upshotautomatic build-up of nested sumsefficient implementation in FORM
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.17
Difference eqDifference equations
Single-step difference equation in N
extremely simple example1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
= −
N+3+3εN+2
2 p ·qq2
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
+2
N+2
1
1
1 1
1
1 2
1 1
Formal equation
, formal solution , input to solution
I(N) = −N+3+3ε
N+2I(N− 1) +
2
N+2G(N)
I(N) = (−1)NQN
j=1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=1(j+2)I(0) + (−1)N
NX
i=1
(−1)jQN
j=i+1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=i(j+2)G(i)
I(0) = −2
3
1
ε2+
23
3
1
ε− 42
G(i) =(−1)i
ε22
3
„
S1(i+2)
i+2−
S1,2(i)
2−
S2(i+1)
2(i+1)− S2(i)−
1
(i+1)2−
1
(i+2)2
«
+ . . .
Upshotautomatic build-up of nested sumsefficient implementation in FORM
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.17
Difference eqDifference equations
Single-step difference equation in N
extremely simple example1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
= −
N+3+3εN+2
2 p ·qq2
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
+2
N+2
1
1
1 1
1
1 2
1 1
Formal equation, formal solution
, input to solution
I(N) = −N+3+3ε
N+2I(N− 1) +
2
N+2G(N)
I(N) = (−1)NQN
j=1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=1(j+2)I(0) + (−1)N
NX
i=1
(−1)jQN
j=i+1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=i(j+2)G(i)
I(0) = −2
3
1
ε2+
23
3
1
ε− 42
G(i) =(−1)i
ε22
3
„
S1(i+2)
i+2−
S1,2(i)
2−
S2(i+1)
2(i+1)− S2(i)−
1
(i+1)2−
1
(i+2)2
«
+ . . .
Upshotautomatic build-up of nested sumsefficient implementation in FORM
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.17
Difference eqDifference equations
Single-step difference equation in N
extremely simple example1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
= −
N+3+3εN+2
2 p ·qq2
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
+2
N+2
1
1
1 1
1
1 2
1 1
Formal equation, formal solution, input to solution
I(N) = −N+3+3ε
N+2I(N− 1) +
2
N+2G(N)
I(N) = (−1)NQN
j=1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=1(j+2)I(0) + (−1)N
NX
i=1
(−1)jQN
j=i+1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=i(j+2)G(i)
I(0) = −2
3
1
ε2+
23
3
1
ε− 42
G(i) =(−1)i
ε22
3
„
S1(i+2)
i+2−
S1,2(i)
2−
S2(i+1)
2(i+1)− S2(i)−
1
(i+1)2−
1
(i+2)2
«
+ . . .
Upshotautomatic build-up of nested sumsefficient implementation in FORM
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.17
Difference eqDifference equations
Single-step difference equation in N
extremely simple example1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
= −
N+3+3εN+2
2 p ·qq2
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
+2
N+2
1
1
1 1
1
1 2
1 1
Formal equation, formal solution, input to solution
I(N) = −N+3+3ε
N+2I(N− 1) +
2
N+2G(N)
I(N) = (−1)NQN
j=1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=1(j+2)I(0) + (−1)N
NP
i=1
(−1)jQN
j=i+1(j+3+3ε)QN
j=i(j+2)G(i)
I(0) = −2
3
1
ε2+
23
3
1
ε− 42
G(i) =(−1)i
ε22
3
„
S1(i+2)
i+2−
S1,2(i)
2−
S2(i+1)
2(i+1)− S2(i)−
1
(i+1)2−
1
(i+2)2
«
+ . . .
Upshotautomatic build-up of nested sumsefficient implementation in FORM
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.17
LA13 exampleI(N) =
sign(N)*ep^-2 * ( 4/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 8/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 4/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1),N) + 2/3*S(R(1,2),N) + 2/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 2/3*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 2*S(R(2),N) - 4/3*S(R(2),N)*N + 4*S(R(2,1),N) + 4/3*S(R(2,1),N)*N- 6*S(R(3),N) - 2*S(R(3),N)*N - 8/3*den(1 + N)^2 - 4*den(1 + N)^3 - 4/3*den(2+ N)^2 - 2*den(2 + N)^3 )
+ sign(N)*ep^-1 * ( - 16*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 88/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 20/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^3 - 16*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) -44/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 - 10/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3 - 20*S(R(1),N)+ 8/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 8/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 8/3*S(R(1
,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 8/3*S(R(1,1),N) + 10/3*S(R(1,1,2),N) + 10/3*S(R(1,2),1+ N)*den(1 + N) + 10/3*S(R(1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 16*S(R(1,2),N) - 4*S(R(1,2)
,N)*N + 14*S(R(1,2,1),N) + 4*S(R(1,2,1),N)*N - 24*S(R(1,3),N) - 6*S(R(1,3),N)*N- 58/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 40/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 46/3*S(R(2)
,2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 6*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 56/3*S(R(2),N) + 20*S(R(2),N)*N + 10*S(R(2,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 6*S(R(2,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 134/3*S(R(2,1),N) - 56/3*S(R(2,1),N)*N + 16/3*S(R(2,1,1),N) + 8/3*S(R(2,1,1),N)*N - 62/3*S(R(2,2),N) - 22/3*S(R(2,2),N)*N - 18*S(R(3),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 12*S(R(3),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 76*S(R(3),N) + 100/3*S(R(3),N)*N - 10*S(R(3,1),N) - 10/3*S(R(3,1),N)*N + 36*S(R(4),N) + 12*S(R(4),N)*N + 32*den(1 + N)^2 + 164/3*den(1 + N)^3 + 24*den(1 + N)^4 + 16*den(2 + N)^2 + 82/3*den(2 + N)^3 + 12*den(2 + N)^4 )
+ sign(N) * ( 100*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 168*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 268/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^3 - 16/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^4 + 100*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 84*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 134/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3 - 8/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^4 + 160*S(R(1),N) - 32*S(R(1,1),1 +N)*den(1 + N) - 80/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 20/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1+ N)^3 - 32*S(R(1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 4/3*S(R(1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 - 10/
3*S(R(1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3 - 40*S(R(1,1),N) + 4/3*S(R(1,1,1),1 + N)*den(1 +N) - 40/3*S(R(1,1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1,1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 44/3*S(R(1,1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1,1,1),N) + 38/3*S(R(1,1,1,2),N) + 38/3*S(R(1,1,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 38/3*S(R(1,1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 68*S(R(1,1,2),N) - 12*S(R(1,1,2),N)*N + 42*S(R(1,1,2,1),N) + 12*S(R(1,1,2,1),N)*N - 76*S(R(1,1,3),N) - 18*S(R(1,1,3),N)*N - 170/3*S(R(1,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 40/3*S(R(1,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 134/3*S(R(1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 14*S(R(1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 430/3*S(R(1,2),N) + 60*S(R(1,2),N)*N + 30*S(R(1,2,1),1 + N)*den(1+ N) + 18*S(R(1,2,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 452/3*S(R(1,2,1),N) - 56*S(R(1,2,1),N)
*N + 74/3*S(R(1,2,1,1),N) + 8*S(R(1,2,1,1),N)*N - 248/3*S(R(1,2,2),N) - 22*S(R(1,2,2),N)*N - 58*S(R(1,3),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 40*S(R(1,3),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 886/
3*S(R(1,3),N) + 100*S(R(1,3),N)*N - 116/3*S(R(1,3,1),N) - 10*S(R(1,3,1),N)*N +410/3*S(R(1,4),N) + 36*S(R(1,4),N)*N + 186*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 448/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 160/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^3 + 138*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 206/3*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 80/3*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3- 70*S(R(2),N) - 160*S(R(2),N)*N - 338/3*S(R(2,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 64/3*S(R(
2,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 206/3*S(R(2,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 10/3*S(R(2,1),2 +N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 760/3*S(R(2,1),N) + 140*S(R(2,1),N)*N + 50/3*S(R(2,1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 26/3*S(R(2,1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 170/3*S(R(2,1,1),N) - 100/3*S(R(2,1,1),N)*N - 12*S(R(2,1,1,1),N) + 4/3*S(R(2,1,1,1),N)*N + 38/3*S(R(2,1,2),N)- 2/3*S(R(2,1,2),N)*N - 182/3*S(R(2,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 116/3*S(R(2,2),2 + N
)*den(2 + N) + 676/3*S(R(2,2),N) + 308/3*S(R(2,2),N)*N - 118/3*S(R(2,2,1),N) -18*S(R(2,2,1),N)*N + 296/3*S(R(2,3),N) + 36*S(R(2,3),N)*N + 694/3*S(R(3),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 188/3*S(R(3),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 448/3*S(R(3),2 + N)*den(2 + N)+ 80/3*S(R(3),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 - 1454/3*S(R(3),N) - 290*S(R(3),N)*N - 86/3*
S(R(3,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 56/3*S(R(3,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 440/3*S(R(3,1),N)+ 164/3*S(R(3,1),N)*N - 10*S(R(3,1,1),N) - 10/3*S(R(3,1,1),N)*N + 80*S(R(3,2),N
) + 80/3*S(R(3,2),N)*N + 302/3*S(R(4),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 194/3*S(R(4),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 434*S(R(4),N) - 556/3*S(R(4),N)*N - 8*S(R(4,1),N) - 8/3*S(R(4,1),N)*N - 150*S(R(5),N) - 50*S(R(5),N)*N - 200*den(1 + N)^2 - 380*den(1 + N)^3 - 896/3*den(1 + N)^4 - 100*den(1 + N)^5 - 100*den(2 + N)^2 - 190*den(2 + N)^3 - 448/3*den(2 + N)^4 - 50*den(2 + N)^5 );
Result for I(N) in the G-scheme
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.18
LA13 exampleI(N) =
sign(N)*ep^-2 * ( 4/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 8/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 4/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1),N) + 2/3*S(R(1,2),N) + 2/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 2/3*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 2*S(R(2),N) - 4/3*S(R(2),N)*N + 4*S(R(2,1),N) + 4/3*S(R(2,1),N)*N- 6*S(R(3),N) - 2*S(R(3),N)*N - 8/3*den(1 + N)^2 - 4*den(1 + N)^3 - 4/3*den(2+ N)^2 - 2*den(2 + N)^3 )
+ sign(N)*ep^-1 * ( - 16*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 88/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 20/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^3 - 16*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) -44/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 - 10/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3 - 20*S(R(1),N)+ 8/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 8/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 8/3*S(R(1
,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 8/3*S(R(1,1),N) + 10/3*S(R(1,1,2),N) + 10/3*S(R(1,2),1+ N)*den(1 + N) + 10/3*S(R(1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 16*S(R(1,2),N) - 4*S(R(1,2)
,N)*N + 14*S(R(1,2,1),N) + 4*S(R(1,2,1),N)*N - 24*S(R(1,3),N) - 6*S(R(1,3),N)*N- 58/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 40/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 46/3*S(R(2)
,2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 6*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 56/3*S(R(2),N) + 20*S(R(2),N)*N + 10*S(R(2,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 6*S(R(2,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 134/3*S(R(2,1),N) - 56/3*S(R(2,1),N)*N + 16/3*S(R(2,1,1),N) + 8/3*S(R(2,1,1),N)*N - 62/3*S(R(2,2),N) - 22/3*S(R(2,2),N)*N - 18*S(R(3),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 12*S(R(3),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 76*S(R(3),N) + 100/3*S(R(3),N)*N - 10*S(R(3,1),N) - 10/3*S(R(3,1),N)*N + 36*S(R(4),N) + 12*S(R(4),N)*N + 32*den(1 + N)^2 + 164/3*den(1 + N)^3 + 24*den(1 + N)^4 + 16*den(2 + N)^2 + 82/3*den(2 + N)^3 + 12*den(2 + N)^4 )
+ sign(N) * ( 100*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 168*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 268/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^3 - 16/3*S(R(1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^4 + 100*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 84*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 134/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3 - 8/3*S(R(1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^4 + 160*S(R(1),N) - 32*S(R(1,1),1 +N)*den(1 + N) - 80/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 20/3*S(R(1,1),1 + N)*den(1+ N)^3 - 32*S(R(1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 4/3*S(R(1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 - 10/
3*S(R(1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3 - 40*S(R(1,1),N) + 4/3*S(R(1,1,1),1 + N)*den(1 +N) - 40/3*S(R(1,1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1,1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 44/3*S(R(1,1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 4/3*S(R(1,1,1),N) + 38/3*S(R(1,1,1,2),N) + 38/3*S(R(1,1,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 38/3*S(R(1,1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 68*S(R(1,1,2),N) - 12*S(R(1,1,2),N)*N + 42*S(R(1,1,2,1),N) + 12*S(R(1,1,2,1),N)*N - 76*S(R(1,1,3),N) - 18*S(R(1,1,3),N)*N - 170/3*S(R(1,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 40/3*S(R(1,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 134/3*S(R(1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 14*S(R(1,2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 430/3*S(R(1,2),N) + 60*S(R(1,2),N)*N + 30*S(R(1,2,1),1 + N)*den(1+ N) + 18*S(R(1,2,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 452/3*S(R(1,2,1),N) - 56*S(R(1,2,1),N)
*N + 74/3*S(R(1,2,1,1),N) + 8*S(R(1,2,1,1),N)*N - 248/3*S(R(1,2,2),N) - 22*S(R(1,2,2),N)*N - 58*S(R(1,3),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 40*S(R(1,3),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 886/
3*S(R(1,3),N) + 100*S(R(1,3),N)*N - 116/3*S(R(1,3,1),N) - 10*S(R(1,3,1),N)*N +410/3*S(R(1,4),N) + 36*S(R(1,4),N)*N + 186*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 448/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 160/3*S(R(2),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^3 + 138*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 206/3*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 80/3*S(R(2),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^3- 70*S(R(2),N) - 160*S(R(2),N)*N - 338/3*S(R(2,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 64/3*S(R(
2,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 - 206/3*S(R(2,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 10/3*S(R(2,1),2 +N)*den(2 + N)^2 + 760/3*S(R(2,1),N) + 140*S(R(2,1),N)*N + 50/3*S(R(2,1,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 26/3*S(R(2,1,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 170/3*S(R(2,1,1),N) - 100/3*S(R(2,1,1),N)*N - 12*S(R(2,1,1,1),N) + 4/3*S(R(2,1,1,1),N)*N + 38/3*S(R(2,1,2),N)- 2/3*S(R(2,1,2),N)*N - 182/3*S(R(2,2),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 116/3*S(R(2,2),2 + N
)*den(2 + N) + 676/3*S(R(2,2),N) + 308/3*S(R(2,2),N)*N - 118/3*S(R(2,2,1),N) -18*S(R(2,2,1),N)*N + 296/3*S(R(2,3),N) + 36*S(R(2,3),N)*N + 694/3*S(R(3),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 188/3*S(R(3),1 + N)*den(1 + N)^2 + 448/3*S(R(3),2 + N)*den(2 + N)+ 80/3*S(R(3),2 + N)*den(2 + N)^2 - 1454/3*S(R(3),N) - 290*S(R(3),N)*N - 86/3*
S(R(3,1),1 + N)*den(1 + N) - 56/3*S(R(3,1),2 + N)*den(2 + N) + 440/3*S(R(3,1),N)+ 164/3*S(R(3,1),N)*N - 10*S(R(3,1,1),N) - 10/3*S(R(3,1,1),N)*N + 80*S(R(3,2),N
) + 80/3*S(R(3,2),N)*N + 302/3*S(R(4),1 + N)*den(1 + N) + 194/3*S(R(4),2 + N)*den(2 + N) - 434*S(R(4),N) - 556/3*S(R(4),N)*N - 8*S(R(4,1),N) - 8/3*S(R(4,1),N)*N - 150*S(R(5),N) - 50*S(R(5),N)*N - 200*den(1 + N)^2 - 380*den(1 + N)^3 - 896/3*den(1 + N)^4 - 100*den(1 + N)^5 - 100*den(2 + N)^2 - 190*den(2 + N)^3 - 448/3*den(2 + N)^4 - 50*den(2 + N)^5 );
Result for I(N) in the G-scheme
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.18
Splitting functions (nut shell)Splitting functions in a nut shell
Calculate anomalous dimensions (Mellin moments of splittingfunctions) −→ divergence of Feynman diagrams in dimensionalregularization D = 4− 2ε
γ(n)ij (N) = −
Z 1
0dx x
N−1P
(n)ij (x)
One-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 18 for γ(0)ij / P
(0)ij
(pencil + paper)
Two-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 350 for γ(1)ij / P
(1)ij
(simple computer algebra)
Three-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 9607 for γ(2)ij / P
(2)ij
(cutting edge technology −→ computer al-gebra system FORM Vermaseren ‘89-‘04)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.19
Splitting functions (nut shell)Splitting functions in a nut shell
Calculate anomalous dimensions (Mellin moments of splittingfunctions) −→ divergence of Feynman diagrams in dimensionalregularization D = 4− 2ε
γ(n)ij (N) = −
Z 1
0dx x
N−1P
(n)ij (x)
One-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 18 for γ(0)ij / P
(0)ij
(pencil + paper)
Two-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 350 for γ(1)ij / P
(1)ij
(simple computer algebra)
Three-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 9607 for γ(2)ij / P
(2)ij
(cutting edge technology −→ computer al-gebra system FORM Vermaseren ‘89-‘04)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.19
Splitting functions (nut shell)Splitting functions in a nut shell
Calculate anomalous dimensions (Mellin moments of splittingfunctions) −→ divergence of Feynman diagrams in dimensionalregularization D = 4− 2ε
γ(n)ij (N) = −
Z 1
0dx x
N−1P
(n)ij (x)
One-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 18 for γ(0)ij / P
(0)ij
(pencil + paper)
Two-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 350 for γ(1)ij / P
(1)ij
(simple computer algebra)
Three-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 9607 for γ(2)ij / P
(2)ij
(cutting edge technology −→ computer al-gebra system FORM Vermaseren ‘89-‘04)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.19
Splitting functions (nut shell)Splitting functions in a nut shell
Calculate anomalous dimensions (Mellin moments of splittingfunctions) −→ divergence of Feynman diagrams in dimensionalregularization D = 4− 2ε
γ(n)ij (N) = −
Z 1
0dx x
N−1P
(n)ij (x)
One-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 18 for γ(0)ij / P
(0)ij
(pencil + paper)
Two-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 350 for γ(1)ij / P
(1)ij
(simple computer algebra)
Three-loop Feynman diagrams
−→ in total 9607 for γ(2)ij / P
(2)ij
(cutting edge technology −→ computer al-gebra system FORM Vermaseren ‘89-‘04)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.19
LO/NLO PLO and NLO splitting functionsP (0)
ns (x) = CF(2pqq(x)+3δ(1− x))
P (0)ps (x) = 0
P (0)qg (x) = 2nf pqg(x)
P (0)gq (x) = 2CF pgq(x)
P (0)gg (x) = CA
(
4pgg(x)+113
δ(1− x))
−
23
nf δ(1− x)
P(1)+ns (x) = 4CACF
(
pqq(x)[67
18−ζ2 +
116
H0 +H0,0
]
+ pqq(−x)[
ζ2 +2H−1,0 −H0,0
]
+143
(1− x)+δ(1− x)[17
24+
113
ζ2 −3ζ3
])
−4CFnf
(
pqq(x)[5
9+
13
H0
]
+23(1− x)
+δ(1− x)[ 1
12+
23
ζ2
])
+4CF2(
2pqq(x)[
H1,0 −34
H0 +H2
]
−2pqq(−x)[
ζ2 +2H−1,0
−H0,0
]
− (1− x)[
1−32
H0
]
−H0 − (1+ x)H0,0 +δ(1− x)[3
8−3ζ2 +6ζ3
])
P(1)−ns (x) = P(1)+
ns (x)+16CF
(
CF −
CA
2
)(
pqq(−x)[
ζ2 +2H−1,0 −H0,0
]
−2(1− x)
− (1+ x)H0
)
P(1)ps (x) = 4CFnf
(209
1x−2+6x−4H0 + x2
[83
H0 −569
]
+(1+ x)[
5H0 −2H0,0
])
P(1)qg (x) = 4CAnf
(209
1x−2+25x−2pqg(−x)H
−1,0 −2pqg(x)H1,1 + x2[44
3H0 −
2189
]
+4(1− x)[
H0,0 −2H0 + xH1
]
−4ζ2x−6H0,0 +9H0
)
+4CFnf
(
2pqg(x)[
H1,0 +H1,1 +H2
−ζ2
]
+4x2[
H0 +H0,0 +52
]
+2(1− x)[
H0 +H0,0 −2xH1 +294
]
−
152−H0,0 −
12
H0
)
P(1)gq (x) = 4CACF
(1x
+2pgq(x)[
H1,0 +H1,1 +H2 −116
H1
]
− x2[8
3H0 −
449
]
+4ζ2 −2
−7H0 +2H0,0 −2H1x+(1+ x)[
2H0,0 −5H0 +379
]
−2pgq(−x)H−1,0
)
−4CFnf
(23
x
−pgq(x)[2
3H1 −
109
])
+4CF2(
pgq(x)[
3H1 −2H1,1
]
+(1+ x)[
H0,0 −72
+72
H0
]
−3H0,0
+1−32
H0 +2H1x)
P(1)gg (x) = 4CAnf
(
1− x−109
pgg(x)−139
(1x− x2
)
−
23(1+ x)H0 −
23
δ(1− x))
+4CA2(
27
+(1+ x)[11
3H0 +8H0,0 −
272
]
+2pgg(−x)[
H0,0 −2H−1,0 −ζ2
]
−
679
(1x− x2
)
−12H0
−
443
x2H0 +2pgg(x)[67
18−ζ2 +H0,0 +2H1,0 +2H2
]
+δ(1− x)[8
3+3ζ3
])
+4CFnf
(
2H0
+23
1x
+103
x2−12+(1+ x)
[
4−5H0 −2H0,0
]
−
12
δ(1− x))
.
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.20
LO ns P@
NNLO non-singlet splitting functionsS.M., Vermaseren, Vogt ‘04
P(2)+ns (x) = 16CACFnf
(16
pqq(x)[10
3ζ2 −
20936
−9ζ3 −16718
H0 +2H0ζ2 −7H0,0 −2H0,0,0
+3H1,0,0 −H3
]
+13
pqq(−x)[3
2ζ3 −
53
ζ2 −H−2,0 −2H
−1ζ2 −103
H−1,0 −H
−1,0,0
+2H−1,2 +
12
H0ζ2 +53
H0,0 +H0,0,0 −H3
]
+(1− x)[1
6ζ2 −
25754
−
4318
H0 −16
H0,0 −H1
]
− (1+ x)[2
3H−1,0 +
12
H2
]
+13
ζ2 +H0 +16
H0,0 +δ(1− x)[5
4−
16754
ζ2 +1
20ζ2
2 +2518
ζ3
])
+16CACF2(
pqq(x)[5
6ζ3 −
6920
ζ22−H
−3,0 −3H−2ζ2 −14H
−2,−1,0 +3H−2,0 +5H
−2,0,0
−4H−2,2 −
15148
H0 +4112
H0ζ2 −172
H0ζ3 −134
H0,0 −4H0,0ζ2 −2312
H0,0,0 +5H0,0,0,0 +23
H3
−24H1ζ3 −16H1,−2,0 +679
H1,0 −2H1,0ζ2 +313
H1,0,0 +11H1,0,0,0 +8H1,1,0,0 −8H1,3 +H4
+679
H2 −2H2ζ2 +113
H2,0 +5H2,0,0 +H3,0
]
+ pqq(−x)[1
4ζ2
2−
679
ζ2 +314
ζ3 +5H−3,0
−32H−2ζ2 −4H
−2,−1,0 −316
H−2,0 +21H
−2,0,0 +30H−2,2 −
313
H−1ζ2 −42H
−1ζ3 +94
H0
−4H−1,−2,0 +56H
−1,−1ζ2 −36H−1,−1,0,0 −56H
−1,−1,2 −134
9H−1,0 −42H
−1,0ζ2 −H3,0
+32H−1,3 −
316
H−1,0,0 +17H
−1,0,0,0 +313
H−1,2 +2H
−1,2,0 +1312
H0ζ2 +292
H0ζ3 +679
H0,0
+13H0,0ζ2 +8912
H0,0,0 −5H0,0,0,0 −7H2ζ2 −316
H3 −10H4
]
+(1− x)[133
36+4H0,0,0,0
−
1674
ζ3 −2H0ζ3 −2H−3,0 +H
−2ζ2 +2H−2,−1,0 −3H
−2,0,0 +774
H0,0,0 −209
6H1 −7H1ζ2
+4H1,0,0 +143
H1,0
]
+(1+ x)[43
2ζ2 −3ζ2
2 +252
H−2,0 −31H
−1ζ2 −14H−1,−1,0 −
133
H−1,0
+24H−1,2 +23H
−1,0,0 +552
H0ζ2 +5H0,0ζ2 +1457
48H0 −
102536
H0,0 −1556
H2 +H2ζ2 −15H3
+2H2,0,0 −3H4
]
−5ζ2 −12
ζ22 +50ζ3 −2H
−3,0 −7H−2,0 −H0ζ3 −
372
H0ζ2 −2429
H0
−2H0,0ζ2 +185
6H0,0 −22H0,0,0 −4H0,0,0,0 +
283
H2 +6H3 +δ(1− x)[151
64+ζ2ζ3 −
20524
ζ2
−
24760
ζ22 +
21112
ζ3 +152
ζ5
])
+16CA2CF
(
pqq(x)[245
48−
6718
ζ2 +125
ζ22 +
12
ζ3 +1043216
H0
+H−3,0 +4H
−2,−1,0 −32
H−2,0 −H
−2,0,0 +2H−2,2 −
3112
H0ζ2 +4H0ζ3 +38972
H0,0 −2H2,0,0
−H0,0,0,0 +9H1ζ3 +6H1,−2,0 −H1,0ζ2 −114
H1,0,0 −3H1,0,0,0 −4H1,1,0,0 +4H1,3 +3112
H0,0,0
+1112
H3 +H4
]
+ pqq(−x)[67
18ζ2 −ζ2
2−
114
ζ3 −H−3,0 +8H
−2ζ2 +116
H−2,0 −4H
−2,0,0
−3H−1,0,0,0 +
113
H−1ζ2 +12H
−1ζ3 −16H−1,−1ζ2 +8H
−1,−1,0,0 +16H−1,−1,2 +
679
H−1,0
−8H−2,2 +11H
−1,0ζ2 +116
H−1,0,0 −
113
H−1,2 −8H
−1,3 −34
H0 −16
H0ζ2 −4H0ζ3 −6718
H0,0
−3H0,0ζ2 −3112
H0,0,0 +H0,0,0,0 +2H2ζ2 +116
H3 +2H4
]
+(1− x)[1883
108−
12
H0,0,0,0 +11H1
−H−2,−1,0 +
12
H−3,0 −
12
H−2ζ2 +
12
H−2,0,0 +
52336
H0 +H0ζ3 −133
H0,0 −52
H0,0,0 +2H1ζ2
−2H1,0,0
]
+(1+ x)[
8H−1ζ2 +4H
−1,−1,0 +83
H−1,0 −5H
−1,0,0 −6H−1,2 −
133
ζ2 +38
ζ22
−
434
ζ3 −52
H−2,0 −
112
H0ζ2 −12
H2ζ2 −54
H0,0ζ2 +7H2 −14
H2,0,0 +3H3 +34
H4
]
+12
H0,0ζ2
+14
ζ22−
83
ζ2 +172
ζ3 +H−2,0 −
192
H0 +52
H0ζ2 −H0ζ3 +133
H0,0 +52
H0,0,0 +12
H0,0,0,0
−δ(1− x)[1657
576−
28127
ζ2 +18
ζ22 +
979
ζ3 −52
ζ5
])
+16CFn2f
( 118
pqq(x)[
H0,0 −13
+53
H0
]
+(1− x)[13
54+
19
H0
]
−δ(1− x)[ 17
144−
527
ζ2 +19
ζ3
])
+16CF2nf
(13
pqq(x)[
5ζ3 −4H1,0,0
−
5516
+58
H0 +H0ζ2 +32
H0,0 −H0,0,0 −103
H1,0 −103
H2 −2H2,0 −2H3
]
+23
pqq(−x)[5
3ζ2
−
32
ζ3 +H−2,0 +2H
−1ζ2 +103
H−1,0 +H
−1,0,0 −2H−1,2 −
12
H0ζ2 −53
H0,0 −H0,0,0 +H3
]
− (1− x)[10
9+
1918
H0,0 −43
H1 +23
H1,0 +43
H2
]
+(1+ x)[4
3H−1,0 −
2524
H0 +12
H0,0,0
]
+29
H0
+79
H0,0 +43
H2 −δ(1− x)[23
16−
512
ζ2 −2930
ζ22 +
176
ζ3
])
+16CF3(
pqq(x)[ 9
10ζ2
2−2H
−3,0
+6H−2ζ2 +12H
−2,−1,0 −6H−2,0,0 −
316
H0 −32
H0ζ2 +H0ζ3 +138
H0,0 −2H0,0,0,0 +8H1,3
+12H1ζ3 +8H1,−2,0 −6H1,0,0 −4H1,0,0,0 +4H1,2,0 −3H2,0 +2H2,0,0 +4H2,1,0 +4H2,2
+4H3,0 +4H3,1 +2H4
]
+ pqq(−x)[7
2ζ2
2−
92
ζ3 −6H−3,0 +32H
−2ζ2 +8H−2,−1,0 +3H
−2,0
−26H−2,0,0 −28H
−2,2 +6H−1ζ2 +36H
−1ζ3 +8H−1,−2,0 −48H
−1,−1ζ2 +40H−1,−1,0,0
+48H−1,−1,2 +40H
−1,0ζ2 +3H−1,0,0 −22H
−1,0,0,0 −6H−1,2 −4H
−1,2,0 −32H−1,3 −
32
H0
−
32
H0ζ2 −13H0ζ3 −14H0,0ζ2 −92
H0,0,0 +6H0,0,0,0 +6H2ζ2 +3H3 +2H3,0 +12H4
]
+(1− x)[
2H−3,0 −
318
+4H−2,0,0 +H0,0ζ2 −3H0,0,0,0 +35H1 +6H1ζ2 −H1,0 +
52
H2,0
]
+(1+ x)[37
10ζ2
2−
934
ζ2 −812
ζ3 −15H−2,0 +30H
−1ζ2 +12H−1,−1,0 −2H
−1,0 −26H−1,0,0
−24H−1,2 −
53916
H0 −28H0ζ2 +1918
H0,0 +20H0,0,0 +854
H2 −3H2,0,0 −2H3,0 +13H3
−H4
]
+4ζ2 +33ζ3 +4H−3,0 +10H
−2,0 +672
H0 +6H0ζ3 +19H0ζ2 −25H0,0 −17H0,0,0
−2H2 −H2,0 −4H3 +δ(1− x)[29
32−2ζ2ζ3 +
98
ζ2 +185
ζ22 +
174
ζ3 −15ζ5
])
.
P(2)−ns (x) = P(2)+
ns (x)+16CACF
(
CF −
CA
2
)(
pqq(−x)[134
9ζ2 −4ζ2
2−11ζ3 −4H
−3,0
+32H−2ζ2 +
223
H−2,0 −16H
−2,0,0 −32H−2,2 +
443
H−1ζ2 +48H
−1ζ3 −64H−1,−1ζ2
+32H−1,−1,0,0 +64H
−1,−1,2 +268
9H−1,0 +44H
−1,0ζ2 +223
H−1,0,0 −12H
−1,0,0,0 −443
H−1,2
−32H−1,3 −3H0 −
23
H0ζ2 −16H0ζ3 −134
9H0,0 −12H0,0ζ2 −
313
H0,0,0 +4H0,0,0,0 +8H2ζ2
+223
H3 +8H4
]
+(1− x)[367
18+
12
ζ22 +2H
−3,0 −2H−2ζ2 −4H
−2,−1,0 −10H−2,0 −2H0,0
+2H−2,0,0 +2H0ζ3 +H0,0ζ2 −H0,0,0,0 +8H1ζ2 +
1403
H1
]
+(1+ x)[
32H−1ζ2 −18ζ2
−23ζ3 +263
H−1,0 −16H
−1,0,0 −32H−1,2 −
48118
H0 −29H0ζ2 +5H0,0,0 +24H3 +703
H2
]
−2ζ2 −2ζ3 +32H0 +14H0ζ2 +2H0,0,0 −16H3
)
+16CFnf
(
CF −
CA
2
)(
pqq(−x)[
2ζ3
−
209
ζ2 −43
H−2,0 −
83
H−1ζ2 −
409
H−1,0 −
43
H−1,0,0 +
83
H−1,2 +
23
H0ζ2 +209
H0,0 +43
H0,0,0
−
43
H3
]
+(1− x)[61
9−
83
H1
]
+(1+ x)[
2H0,0 −83
H−1,0 +
419
H0 −43
H2
])
+16CF2(
CF −
CA
2
)(
pqq(−x)[
9ζ3 −7ζ22 +12H
−3,0 −64H−2ζ2 −16H
−2,−1,0 −6H−2,0
+52H−2,0,0 +56H
−2,2 −12H−1ζ2 −72H
−1ζ3 −16H−1,−2,0 +96H
−1,−1ζ2 −80H−1,−1,0,0
−96H−1,−1,2 −80H
−1,0ζ2 −6H−1,0,0 +44H
−1,0,0,0 +12H−1,2 +8H
−1,2,0 +64H−1,3 +3H0
+3H0ζ2 +26H0ζ3 +28H0,0ζ2 +9H0,0,0 −12H0,0,0,0 −12H2ζ2 −6H3 −4H3,0 −24H4
]
− (1− x)[
15+8H−3,0 +8H
−2,0,0 +61H0 +6H0ζ3 +2H0,0ζ2 −6H0,0,0,0 +12H1ζ2 +60H1
+8H1,0
]
+(1+ x)[
24ζ2 +57ζ3 +10H−2,0 −48H
−1ζ2 −4H−1,0 +40H
−1,0,0 +48H−1,2
+59H0ζ2 −22H0,0 −35H0,0,0 −22H2 −4H2,0 −44H3
]
+8ζ2 −42ζ3 −4H−2,0 +42H0
−38H0ζ2 +14H0,0 −16H2 +26H0,0,0 +24H3
)
.
P (2)sns (x) = 16nf
dabcdabc
nc
(12(1− x)
[503
+4112
ζ2 −54
ζ22−H
−3,0 +H−2ζ2 −H
−2,0,0 +94
H3
+2H−2,−1,0 +
32
H0,0ζ2 −12
H1ζ2 −34
H1,0,0 +9112
H1
]
+12(1+ x)
[
H−1,−1,0 −
32
H−1ζ2 +
34
H0
−
136
H−1,0 +
12
H−1,0,0 +2H
−1,2 −32
H−2,0 +
94
H0ζ2 +2912
H0,0 +4112
H2 −H2ζ2 −12
H2,0,0
+32
H4
]
−
13
(1x
+ x2)[
3H−1ζ2 +2H
−1,−1,0 −2H−1,0,0 −2H
−1,2 +H1ζ2
]
+13
x2[
5ζ3 −2H3
+2H−2,0 +4H0ζ2 −2H0,0,0 +2H1ζ2
]
+9124
H0 +ζ3 −92
ζ2 +ζ22−H0ζ3 −H0ζ2 −2H0,0ζ2
+38
H0,0 −14
H0,0,0 +12
H0,0,0,0 +H−2,0 −H3
)
.
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.21
LO singlet P@
NNLO singlet splitting functionsS.M., Vermaseren, Vogt ‘04
P(2)ps (x) = 16CACFnf
(43(1x
+ x2)[13
3H−1,0 −
149
H0 +12
H−1ζ2 −H
−1,−1,0 −2H−1,0,0
−H−1,2
]
+23(1x− x2)
[163
ζ2 +H2,1 +9ζ3 +94
H1,0 −6761216
+57172
H1 +103
H2 +H1ζ2 −16
H1,1
−3H1,0,0 +2H1,1,0 +2H1,1,1
]
+(1− x)[182
9H1 +
1583
+39736
H0,0 −132
H−2,0 +3H0,0,0,0
+136
H1,0 +3xH1,0 +H−3,0 +H
−2ζ2 +2H−2,−1,0 +3H
−2,0,0 +12
H0,0ζ2 +12
H1ζ2 −94
H1,0,0
−
34
H1,1 +H1,1,0 +H1,1,1
]
+(1+ x)[ 7
12H0ζ2 +
316
ζ3 +9118
H2 +7112
H3 +11318
ζ2 −82627
H0
+52
H2,0 +163
H−1,0 +6xH
−1,0 +316
H0,0,0 −176
H2,1 +11720
ζ22 +9H0ζ3 +
52
H−1ζ2 +2H2,1,0
+12
H−1,0,0 −2H
−1,2 +H2ζ2 −72
H2,0,0 +H−1,−1,0 +2H2,1,1 +H3,1 −
12
H4
]
+5H−2,0 +H2,1
+H0,0,0,0 −12
ζ22 +4H
−3,0 +4H0ζ3 −329
H0,0 −2912
H0 −23512
ζ2 −51112
−
9712
H1 +334
H2 −H3
−
112
H0ζ2 −112
ζ3 −32
H2,0 −10H0,0,0 +23
x2[83
4H0,0 −
2434
H0 +10ζ2 +511
8+
978
H1 −43
H2
−4ζ3 −H0ζ2 +H3 +H2,0 −6H−2,0
])
+16CFnf2( 2
27H0 −2−H2 +ζ2 +
23
x2[
H2 −ζ2 +3
−
196
H0
]
+29(1x− x2)
[
H1,1 +53
H1 +23
]
+(1− x)[1
6H1,1 −
76
H1 + xH1 +3527
H0 +18554
]
+13(1+ x)
[43
H2 −43
ζ2 +ζ3 +H2,1 −2H3 +2H0ζ2 +296
H0,0 +H0,0,0
])
+16CF2nf
(8512
H1
−
254
H0,0 −H0,0,0 +58312
H0 −10154
+734
ζ2 −734
H2 +H3 −5H2,0 −H2,1 −H0ζ2 + x2[55
12
−
8512
H1 −223
H0,0 −109
6−
1354
H0 +289
ζ2 −289
H2 −163
H0ζ2 +163
H3 +4H2,0 +43
H2,1 −263
ζ3
+223
H0,0,0
]
+43(1x− x2)
[2312
H1,0 −523144
H1 −3ζ3 +5516
+12
H1,0,0 +H1,1 −H1,1,0 −H1,1,1
]
+(1− x)[1
2H1,0,0 +
712
H1,1 −2743
72H0 −
5312
H0,0 −25112
H1 −54
ζ2 +54
H2 −83
H1,0 +3xH1,0
+3H0ζ2 −3H3 −H1,1,0 −H1,1,1
]
+(1+ x)[1669
216+
52
H0,0,0 +4H2,1 +7H2,0 +10xζ3 −3710
ζ22
−7H0ζ3 +6H0,0ζ2 −4H0,0,0,0 +H2,0,0 −2H2,1,0 −2H2,1,1 −4H3,0 −H3,1 −6H4
])
.
P (2)qg (x) = 16CACF nf
(
pqg(x)[39
2H1ζ3 −4H1,1,1 +3H2,0,0 −
154
H1,2 +94
H1,1,0 +3H2,1,0
+H0ζ3 −2H2,1,1 +4H2ζ2 −17312
H0ζ2 −55172
H0,0 +643
ζ3 −ζ22−
494
H2 −32
H1,0,0,0 −13
H1,0,0
−
38572
H1,0 −312
H1,1 −11312
H1 +494
H2,0 +52
H1ζ2 +796
H0,0,0 +17312
H3 −1259
32+
2833216
H0
+6H2,1 +3H1,−2,0 +9H1,0ζ2 +6H1,1ζ2 +H1,1,0,0 +3H1,1,1,0 −4H1,1,1,1 −3H1,1,2 −6H1,2,1
−6H1,3 +494
ζ2
]
+ pqg(−x)[17
2H−1ζ3 −
52
H−1,−1,0 −
52
H−1,2 −
92
H−1,0 +
52
H−2,0 +
32
H−1,0,0
−2H3,1 −2H4 −6H−2,2 +6H
−2,−1,0 −6H−2,0,0 +2H0,0ζ2 +9H
−2ζ2 +3H−1,−2,0 −2H
−1,2,1
−6H−1,−1,−1,0 +6H
−1,−1,0,0 +6H−1,−1,2 +9H
−1,0ζ2 −9H−1,−1ζ2 −2H
−1,2,0 −112
H−1,0,0,0
−6H−1,3
]
+(1x− x2)
[5512
−4ζ3 +239
H1,0 −43
H1,1,0
]
+(1x
+ x2)[2
3H1,0,0 −
371108
H1 +239
H1,1
−
23
H1,1,1
]
+(1− x)[
6H2,1,0 +3H2,1,1 −56
H1,1,1 −7H2,0,0 −2H1,2 +39H0ζ3 −4H2ζ2 −163
ζ3
+H1,1,0 +154
3H0ζ2 +
89924
H0,0 +12110
ζ22 +
60736
H2 −52
H1ζ2 +656
H1,0,0 −2912
H1,0 −1318
H1,1
−
1189108
H1 −673
H2,1 −29H2,0 −94936
ζ2 −672
H0,0,0 −142
3H3 +
21532
−
398948
H0 +2H−3,0
]
+(1+ x)[
H−1,0,0 −10H
−2ζ2 +6H−2,0,0 +2H0,0ζ2 −9H
−1,−1,0 −7H−1,2 −9H
−2,0 −2H3,1
−4H−2,−1,0 −4H4 −4H3,0 −4H0,0,0,0 +
372
H−1,0 +
52(1+ x)H
−1ζ2
]
−4H−2,0,0 +2H0,0ζ2
+H2ζ2 −3H1,1,0 +2H0,0,0,0 +H−3,0 −9H2,1,0 −
92
H2,1,1 +113
H1,1,1 +192
H2,0,0 +92
H1,2
−
912
H0ζ3 +8H−2ζ2 +
52
H−1,−1,0 +
52
H−1,2 +
92
H−1,0 +
392
H−2,0 −
47312
H0ζ2 −1853
48H0,0
−
21712
ζ3 −594
ζ22−
16918
H2 −134
H1ζ2 −23
H1,0,0 +16724
H1,0 +19118
H1,1 +1283108
H1 +18512
H2,1
+754
H2,0 +170
9ζ2 +
854
H0,0,0 +42512
H3 +7693192
+3659
48H0 −2x
[
xH2,2 +4H3,0 −4H−2,2
])
+16CAnf2(1
6pqg(x)
[
H1,2 −H1ζ2 −H1,0,0 −H1,1,0 −H1,1,1 −22918
H0 +43
H0,0 +112
]
+ x[1
6H2
−
5318
H0 +176
H0,0 −ζ3 +1118
ζ2 −139108
]
+13
pqg(−x)H−1,0,0 −
53162
(1x− x2)−
29(1− x)
[
6H0,0,0
−
76
xH1 −H0,0 +72
xH1,1
]
+79
x(1+ x)H−1,0 +
74
H0 −1954
H1 +H0,0,0 +59
H1,1 +59
H−1,0
−
85216
)
+16CA2nf
(
pqg(x)[
3H1,3 +316
H1,0,0 −172
H2,1 +75
ζ22−
5512
H1,1,0 +3112
H3 −312
H1ζ3
−
512
H2,0 −638
H1,0 −2312
H1,2 −155
6ζ3 +
2524
H2 −2537
27H0 +
8678
−
232
H−1,0,0 +3H4 −H1,1,1
+38372
H1,1 −252
H−2,0 −
38
ζ2 −74
H1ζ2 −3H0,0ζ2 −3112
H0ζ2 +103216
H1 +52
H1,0,0,0 +2561
72H0,0
+H1,1,1 −2H2,0,0 −3H1,−2,0 −5H1,0ζ2 +3H0,0,0 −H1,1ζ2 −H1,1,0,0 −4H1,1,1,0 +2H1,1,1,1
−2H1,1,2 −2H1,2,0
]
+ pqg(−x)[
H−1,−1ζ2 −2H
−1,2 −6H−1,−1,0 +H1,1,1 +2H
−2ζ2 −H−2,0,0
+72736
H−1,0 −H
−1ζ2 −2H−2,2 −
52
H−1ζ3 −H
−1,−2,0 +2H−1,−1,0,0 +2H
−1,−1,2 −32
H−1,0,0,0
+6H−1,−1,−1,0 −2H
−1,3 +2H−1,2,1
]
+(1x− x2)
[23
H2,1 +329
ζ2 −2H1,0,0 +43
H1,1,0 −109
H1,1
−
83
H−1,0,0 +
32
H1,0 +6ζ3 +16136
H1 −2351108
]
+23(1x
+ x2)[26
3H−1,0 −
289
H0 −2H−1,−1,0
−2H−1,2 +H1ζ2 +H
−1ζ2 +103
H2 +H1,1,1
]
+(1− x)[
15H0,0,0,0 −5H2ζ2 −656
ζ3 +116
H1,1,1
−
32
H4 +52
H0,0ζ2 +H1,1,0 −316
H2,0 +1712
H1,0 −55120
ζ22−
294
H1,0,0 −113
4H2 +
1869172
H0
+2243108
+265
6H−1,0,0 +
332
H2,0,0 +19H2,1 +3112
H1,1 +232
H−2,0 −
49736
ζ2 +296
H1ζ2 −14312
H3
−
116
H1,1,1 −1912
H0ζ2 +1223
72H1 −
436
H0,0,0 −3011
36H0,0
]
+(1+ x)[
8H2,1,0 −4H−1,2
+7H−1,−1,0 −
356
H1,1,1 −5H−2ζ2 −11H
−2,0,0 +13
H−1,0 +
152
H−1ζ2 +8H3,1 −10H
−2,−1,0
+5H2ζ2 +4H2,1,1 −H−3,0 +36H0ζ3 −5H2ζ2
]
+2H−1,2 +6H
−1,−1,0 −6H2,1,0 −3H2,1,1
−11H0,0,0,0 −5H3,1 +254
H1,1,1 +132
H−2ζ2 +
272
H−2,0,0 +
112
H−3,0 +
132
H2ζ2 −174
H1,0,0
+13H−2,−1,0 −
1712
H1,1,1 −34
H4 −14
H0,0ζ2 +H1,2 +112
H1,1,0 +7912
H2,0 +678
H1,0 +263
8ζ2
2
+119
3ζ3 +
96724
H2 −30512
H−1,0 −24H0ζ3 +H
−1ζ2 −13375
72H0 −
188918
−38H−1,0,0 −
212
H2,1
−
794
H2,0,0 −21724
H1,1 −72
H−2,0 +
7972
ζ2 +43
H1ζ2 +1712
H1,1,1 +1712
H0ζ2 +3118
H1 +3H0,0,0
+14512
H3 +1553
24H0,0
)
+16CFnf2(7
6H0,0,0 +
1136
H1 −73996
+16324
H0 +7
24H0,0 +2H0,0,0,0
−
59
H1,1 −59
H2 −5
18H1,0 +
59
ζ2 +16
pqg(x)[
H2,1 +912−
353
H0 −223
H0,0 +H1,1,1 +6H0,0,0
−ζ3 −2H1,0,0 +79
H1
]
+7781
(1x− x2)+(1− x)
[ 112
H1 −6463432
−4H0,0,0,0 −163
H0,0,0 +79
xH1,1
+79
xH2 +89
xH1,0 −79
xζ2
]
− (1+ x)[3475
216H0 +
10312
H0,0
])
+16CF2nf
(
pqg(x)[
7H1,3 +7H4
−2H−3,0 −7H1ζ3 +5H2,2 +6H3,0 +6H3,1 +H2,1,0 +4H2,0,0 +3H2,1 +2H2,1,1 +
52
H2,0
+618
H2 −618
ζ2 +878
H1 +112
H1,2 +618
H1,1 +172
H1,0 −7H0,0ζ2 +52
H1,0,0 +52
H1,1,0 −192
ζ3
+8132
+112
H3 −112
H0ζ2 −72
H1ζ2 +152
H0,0,0 +878
H0 +115
ζ22 +3H1,1,1 −5H2ζ2 −7H0ζ3
+11H0,0 −2H1,−2,0 −7H1,0ζ2 +3H1,0,0,0 −5H1,1ζ2 +4H1,1,0,0 +H1,1,1,0 +2H1,1,1,1 +5H1,1,2
+6H1,2,0 +6H1,2,1
]
+4pqg(−x)[
H0,0,0,0 −H−2,0 +H
−1,−1,0 −H−2,0,0 +
12
H−1,−2,0 −
58
H−1,0
−
54
H−1,0,0 −
12
H−3,0 +
12
H−1ζ2 +H
−1,−1,0,0 −14
H−1,0,0,0
]
+2(1− x)[
H2,1,0 −H2,0,0 −H2,2
−H3,1 −2H3,0 −2H−1ζ2 +H1,2 −H1,0,0 −H1,1,0 +H2ζ2 −ζ2
2 +438
H2 +498
ζ2 +138
H1,1
−
3316
H1 +52
H1,0 +72
H0,0ζ2 +214
ζ3 +47964
−
12
H1,1,1 −12
H3 +14
H2,1 +12
H2,1,1 +32
H0ζ2
+12
H0ζ3 −72
H4 +H1ζ2 −192
H0,0,0 −23916
H0,0 −40532
H0
]
+8(1+ x)[
H−1,−1,0 −H
−1,0,0
−H0,0,0,0 +34
H−2,0 −
94
H−1,0
]
−4H−1,−1,0 +5H0,0,0,0 +5H
−1,0,0 −13H−2,0 +
12
H−1,0
+4xH−2,0,0 −
1138
H2 −718
ζ2 −354
H1 −112
H1,2 −338
H1,1 −72
H1,0 −72
H0,0ζ2 −52
H1,0,0
−
52
H1,1,0 −52
ζ3 −15764
−
94
H1,1,1 −94
H3 −54
H2,1 −12
H2,1,1 +14
H0ζ2 +H2ζ2 +52
H0ζ3
+95
ζ22 +
72
H4 +72
H1ζ2 +494
H0,0,0 +39116
H0,0 +40116
H0 −H2,0,0 −H2,1,0 +H2,2 +H3,1
+2H3,0 +6H−1ζ2 +
12
H2,0 +2H−2ζ2 +4H
−2,−1,0
)
P(2)gq (x) = 16CACFnf
(29
x2[25
6H1 −
1314
+3ζ2 −H−1,0 −3H2 +H1,1 +
1256
H0 −H0,0
]
+56
pgq(x)[
H1,2 +H2,1 +967120
+25190
H1 −3910
H1,1 −3ζ3 −25
H0ζ2 −15
H1ζ2 −43
H1,0 +H1,1,0
−
25
H1,0,0 +H1,1,1 +25
H2,0
]
+23
pgq(−x)[
2H−1ζ2 +
74
ζ2 +4112
H−1,0 −
15172
H0 +12
H−2,0
+53
H2 +2H−1,−1,0 −H
−1,0,0 −H−1,2
]
+23(1− x)
[
H−2,0 +2ζ3 −H3
]
+(1+ x)[179
108H1
+59
ζ2 +259
H−1,0 −
536
H1,1 −16736
H0,0 −13
H2,1 −43
H0ζ2
]
−
19372
+14
H1 +19
H−1,0 +4H2
−
14
H1,1 +22718
H0 −3512
H0,0 −H2,1 −23
H0ζ2 +103
H−2,0 +3ζ3 +2H3 +
23
H0,0,0 + x[11
4ζ2
−
523144
−
1936
H2 +271108
H0 −56
H1,0
])
+16CACF2(
x2[7
2+
17354
H1 −2ζ3 −23
H1,1,1 −269
H1,1
−6H2 +2H2,1 +6ζ2 +33554
H0 −289
H0,0 −83
H0,0,0
]
+ pgq(x)[3
2H1ζ3 +
16332
−5ζ2 +274
ζ3
+6503432
H1 +29
H1,1 +353
H1,1,1 +4H2 +92
H2,1 +4H1,0,0 +2H2,0,0 −H2ζ2 +4112
H1,2 +H2,2
+19124
H1,0 +3H2,0 −2H2,1,1 −32
H−1ζ2 −
5912
H1ζ2 +5H1,−2,0 +H1,0ζ2 +52
H1,0,0,0 −2H1,1ζ2
+1
12H1,1,0 +5H1,1,0,0 −3H1,1,1,0 −4H1,1,1,1 −H1,1,2 −2H1,2,1 +H2,1,0
]
+ pgq(−x)[
H−1,0
+H−1,0ζ2 +
32
H−1,0,0 +
2710
ζ22−3H
−1,−1,0 −112
H−1ζ3 −3H
−1,−2,0 −32
H−1,0,0,0 −3H
−1,2
+5H−1,−1ζ2 −4H
−1,−1,0,0 −2H−1,−1,2 +6H
−1,−1,−1,0 +2H−1,2,1
]
+(1− x)[
H2ζ2 −H2,2
+2312
H1,0 −7061432
H0 −4631144
H0,0 −383
H0,0,0 −H−3,0 −2H3,0 −
4433432
H1 −2H2,0,0 −212
H1,0,0
−
25
ζ22−
72
H1,2 +232
H1ζ2 −4H0ζ3
]
+(1+ x)[49
6H3 −H
−2,0 −556
H0ζ2 −12
H3,1 −1159
36ζ2
+655576
−
1516
ζ3 −18518
H1,1 +16
H1,1,1 −959
H2 +296
H2,1 −171
4H−1,0 −12H
−1,0,0 +7H−1ζ2
+16H−1,−1,0 +
53
H2,0 +32
H2,1,1 +4H0,0,0,0
]
−35H−2,0 −
17927
H0 +2041144
H0,0 −196
H0,0,0
−2H3,0 −132
H0ζ2 −13H−3,0 −
132
H3,1 +152
H3 −2005
64+
1574
ζ2 +8ζ3 +1291432
H1 +5512
H1,1
+32
H2 +12
H2,1 +274
H−1,0 −
112
H1,0,0 −8H2,0,0 −4ζ22 +
32
H1,2 −H2,2 +52
H1ζ2 +8H−1,−1,0
+4H2,0 +32
H2,1,1 −H−1ζ2 +7H2ζ2 +6H
−2ζ2 +12H−2,−1,0 −6H
−2,0,0 + x[
3H1,1,1 −H0,0ζ2
+92
H−1,0,0 −
358
H1,0 +2H4 +3H1,1,0 +H−1,2
])
+16CA2CF
(
x2[2
3H1ζ2 −
210581
−
7718
H0,0
−6H3 +163
ζ3 −10H−1,0 −
143
H2,0 −23
H−1ζ2 −
143
H0,0,0 +104
9H2 −
43
H1,0,0 +379
H1,1
+43
H−1,−1,0 −
1049
ζ2 −83
H2,1 +14518
H1,0 +43
H−1,2 +
23
H1,1,1 −10927
H1 +83
H−1,0,0 +6H0ζ2
+4H−2,0 +
58427
H0
]
+ pgq(x)[7
2H1ζ3 +
1383052592
−
13
H2,0 +134
H−1ζ2 +2H2,1,1 +
112
H1,0,0
+4H3,1 −436
H1,1,1 −10912
ζ2 −173
H2,1 −7124
H1,0 −116
H−2,0 −
212
ζ3 +32
H1,0,0,0 −H1,−2,0
+39554
H0 −2H1,0ζ2 −H1,1ζ2 −5512
H1,1,0 +2H1,1,0,0 +4H1,1,1,0 +2H1,1,1,1 +4H1,1,2 −5512
H1,2
+6H1,2,0 +4H1,2,1 +4H1,3 +3H2,1,0 +3H2,2
]
+ pgq(−x)[23
2H−1ζ3 +5H
−2ζ2 +2H−2,−1,0
+10912
H−1,0 +H0ζ3 +
175
ζ22 +
16
H1ζ2 +2H2ζ2 −6524
H1,1 −192
H−1,−1,0 −4H3,0 −3H2,0,0
−7H−2,0,0 −
32
H−1,2 +
3379216
H1 −4H−2,2 −
496
H−1,0,0 −
112
H−1,0,0,0 −13H
−1,−1ζ2 −8H−1,3
−6H−1,−1,−1,0 +12H
−1,−1,0,0 +10H−1,−1,2 +10H
−1,0ζ2 +5H−1,−2,0 −2H
−1,2,0 −2H−1,2,1
+116
H0ζ2
]
+(1− x)[41699
2592−3H
−2,−1,0 −32
H−2ζ2 −
1289
ζ2 −4H3,0 +263
ζ3 −52
H−2,0,0
−7H1ζ2 +9712
H1,0,0 +103
H−1,0,0 +
24512
H3 −8H0,0,0,0
]
+(1+ x)[
4H3,1 −H2,1,1 +296
H−1,2
+176
H−2,0 −12H2,0 −
3112
H2,1 +12
H2,0,0 −H2ζ2 +6136
H1,0 −4H0ζ3 −133
H−1ζ2 −
463
H−1,−1,0
+254
H4 +934
H0ζ2 −559
H1,1 −7118
H2 +4918
H0,0 −132
H0,0ζ2 −4740
ζ22]
+61312592
−
312
H−2ζ2
−15H−2,−1,0 +
92
H−1,0,0 −3H2,1,1 −
94
H2,1 +533
H−2,0 −
12
H−2,0,0 −5H2,0 −
76
H1,1,1 −8H0ζ3
−
6740
ζ22 +
296
H−1,2 −H
−1,0 +8H−2,2 +25H0ζ2 +
4129
H1 +928
9H0 +
14
H4 −65H3 −38H0,0
−9H−3,0 −
173
H0,0,0 + x[27
2H−1,0 −
12
H0,0,0,0 +34
H0,0ζ2 +12
H−3,0 −14H0,0,0 +
112
H1,1,1
−
4336
ζ2 −12
H2ζ2 +772
H0 +74954
H1 +135
4ζ3 +
9724
H1,0 +4312
H1ζ2 −8512
H−1ζ2 −
133
H1,0,0
+5312
H2 +394
H1,1 −2H3,1 +136
H−1,−1,0 +
74
H2,0,0 −4H1,1,0 −4H1,2
])
+16CFnf2(1
9−
19
1x
+29
x−16
xH1 +16
pgq(x)[
H1,1 −53
H1
])
+16CF2nf
(49
x2[
H0,0 −116
H0 −72
+H−1,0
]
+13
pgq(x)[
H1,2 −H1,0 −H1ζ2 +9ζ3 +8312
H1,1 +2H−2,0 −
736
H1 +2H0ζ2 −162548
+32
H1,0,0
+2H1,1,0 −52
H1,1,1
]
+3118
pgq(−x)[95
93H0 −ζ2 −H
−1,0
]
+13(2− x)
[
6H0,0,0,0 −H3 −13051
288
−
132
ζ3 −4H−2,0 −H2,0 −
12
H1,0 −12
H2,1 +2H0,0,0 −65324
H0,0
]
+(1+ x)[
H0ζ2 −1187216
H0
+89
H2 −8518
H−1,0 −
10118
ζ2
]
−
8027
H0 +2318
ζ2 −13
H1,1 +54
xH1,1 −19
H1 −3712
xH1 +2318
H−1,0
+1501
54+H0ζ2 −H0,0,0 +
1013
H0,0 −13
H1,0
)
+16CF3(
pgq(x)[
3H1,1ζ2 +3H1ζ2 +72
ζ2
−
238
H1,1 −8H1ζ3 −6H1,−2,0 −2H1,0ζ2 +3H1,1,0 −3H1,1,0,0 −H1,1,1,0 +2H1,1,1,1 −3H1,1,2
−2H1,2,0 −2H1,2,1 −92
H1,1,1 −32
H1,0,0 −4716
−
4716
H1 −152
ζ3
]
+ pgq(−x)[
2H−1,−2,0
+6H−1,−1,0 +3H
−1ζ2 +74
H1,0 −165
ζ22−6H
−1,0,0 −72
H−1,0 +4H
−1,−1,0,0 −2H−1,0ζ2
−H−1,0,0,0
]
+(1− x)[
9H1,0,0 +H1,1,1 −10H1ζ2 +3H0ζ3 +H2,2 −H2ζ2 +H0,0,0 +5H2,0,0
−4H3 +H2,1,1 +3H0,0ζ2 +3H3,1 −3H4 +21116
H1 +4920
ζ22]
+(1+ x)[
11ζ3 +14
H1,1 +14
H1,0
+9116
H0 +36H−1,0 +8H
−1,0,0 −14H−1,−1,0 −7H
−1ζ2 +2H1,2 +4H0ζ2 −H2,1 +2H−2,0,0
+5H−2,0 +
112
H2 −2H0,0,0,0
]
−2H−1,−1,0 −H
−1ζ2 −134
ζ2 +94
H1,0 +9
20ζ2
2 +28732
+1116
H1
+4H−1,0,0 +16H
−3,0 −4H−2ζ2 −8H
−2,−1,0 −5H2ζ2 +194
H2 +H2,2 −358
H0,0 +9H0ζ3
+25H−2,0 +6H
−2,0,0 +32
x[58
3ζ2 −
73
H1ζ2 +4H1,1 −32
H1,1,1 +52
H1,0,0 −17596
+H3,1 +193
ζ3
+2H2,0 −14H0 +H0,0ζ2 −H−1,0 −H4 −
32
H2,1 +13
H2,1,1 +3H2,0,0 −56
H3 −H1,2 −76
H0ζ2
+23
H1,1,0 −296
H0,0,0 −185
8H0,0
])
.
P (2)gg (x) = 16CACFnf
(
x2[4
9H2 +3H1,0 −
9712
H1 +83
H−2,0 −
23
H0ζ2 +10327
H0 −163
ζ2 +2H3
−6H−1,0 +2H2,0 +
12718
H0,0 −51112
]
+ pgg(x)[
2ζ3 −5524
]
+43(1x− x2)
[1724
H1,0 −4318
H0
−
521144
H1 −6923432
−
12
H2,1 +2H1ζ2 +H0ζ2 −2H1,0,0 +1
12H1,1 −H1,1,0 −H1,1,1
]
−
17512
H2
+6H−1,0 +8H0ζ3 −6H
−2,0 −536
H0ζ2 −492
H0 +1854
ζ2 +51112
−
12
H2,0 −3H1,0 −4H0,0,0,0
−
6712
H0,0 +432
ζ3 −H2,1 +9712
H1 −4ζ22−
92
H3 −8H−3,0 +
332
H0,0,0 +43(1x
+ x2)[1
2H2 −H2,0
+113
H−1,0 +H
−2,0 +196
ζ2 +2ζ3 −H−1ζ2 −4H
−1,−1,0 −12
H−1,0,0 −H
−1,2
]
+(1− x)[
9H1ζ2
+12H0,0,0,0 −293108
+616
H0ζ2 −73
H1,0 −85736
H1 −9H0ζ3 +16H−2,−1,0 −4H
−2,0,0 +8H−2ζ2
−
132
H1,0,0 +34
H1,1 −H1,1,0 −H1,1,1
]
+(1+ x)[1
6H2,0 −
953
H−1,0 −
14936
H2 +3451108
H0
−7H−2,0 +
3029
H0,0 +196
H3 −99136
ζ2 −163
6ζ3 −
353
H0,0,0 +176
H2,1 −4310
ζ22 +13H
−1ζ2
+18H−1,−1,0 −H3,1 −6H4 −4H
−1,2 +6H0,0ζ2 +8H2ζ2 −7H2,0,0 −2H2,1,0 −2H2,1,1 −4H3,0
−9H−1,0,0
]
−
241288
δ(1− x))
+16CAnf2(19
54H0 −
124
xH0 −1
27pgg(x)+
1354
(1x− x2)
[53−H1
]
+(1− x)[11
72H1 −
71216
]
+29(1+ x)
[
ζ2 +1312
xH0 −12
H0,0 −H2
]
+29
288δ(1− x)
)
+16CA2nf
(
x2[
ζ3 +119
ζ2 +119
H0,0 −23
H3 +23
H0ζ2 +1639108
H0 −2H−2,0
]
+13
pgg(x)[10
3ζ2
−
20936
−8ζ3 −2H−2,0 −
12
H0 −103
H0,0 −203
H1,0 −H1,0,0 −203
H2 −H3
]
+109
pgg(−x)[
ζ2
+2H−1,0 +
310
H0ζ2 −H0,0
]
+13(1x− x2)
[
H3 −H0ζ2 −133
H2 +5443108
−3H1ζ2 +20536
H1
−
133
H1,0 +H1,0,0
]
+(1x
+ x2)[151
54H0 −
83
ζ2 +13
H−1ζ2 −ζ3 +2H
−1,−1,0 −23
H−1,0,0
−
379
H−1,0 +
23
H−1,2
]
+(1− x)[5
6H−2,0 +H
−3,0 +2H0,0,0 −26936
ζ2 −4097216
−3H−2ζ2
−6H−2,−1,0 +3H
−2,0,0 −72
H1ζ2 +67772
H1 +H1,0 +74
H1,0,0
]
+(1+ x)[193
36H2 −
112
H−1ζ2
+3920
ζ22−
712
H3 −539
H0,0 +7
12H0ζ2 −
52
H0,0ζ2 +5ζ3 −7H−1,−1,0 +
776
H−1,0 +
92
H−1,0,0
+2H−1,2 −3H2ζ2 −
23
H2,0 +32
H2,0,0 +32
H4
]
+19
ζ2 +7H−2,0 +2H2 +
45827
H0 +H0,0ζ2
+32
ζ22 +4H
−3,0 − x[131
12H0,0 −
83
H0ζ2 +72
H3 −H0,0,0,0 +76
H0,0,0 +1943216
H0 +6H0ζ3
]
−δ(1− x)[233
288+
16
ζ2 +1
12ζ2
2 +53
ζ3
])
+16CA3(
x2[
33H−2,0 +33H0ζ2 −
124918
H0,0
−44H0,0,0 −110
3H3 −
443
H2,0 +856
ζ2 +6409108
H0
]
+ pgg(x)[245
24−
679
ζ2 −3
10ζ2
2 +113
ζ3
−4H−3,0 +6H
−2ζ2 +4H−2,−1,0 +
113
H−2,0 −4H
−2,0,0 −4H−2,2 +
16
H0 −7H0ζ3 +679
H0,0
−8H0,0ζ2 +4H0,0,0,0 −6H1ζ3 −4H1,−2,0 +10H2,0,0 −6H1,0ζ2 +8H1,0,0,0 +8H1,1,0,0 +8H4
+134
9H1,0 +
116
H1,0,0 +8H1,2,0 +8H1,3 +134
9H2 −4H2ζ2 +8H3,1 +8H2,2 +
116
H3 +10H3,0
+8H2,1,0
]
+ pgg(−x)[11
2ζ2
2−
116
H0ζ2 −4H−3,0 +16H
−2ζ2 −12H−2,2 −
1349
H−1,0 +2H2ζ2
+8H−2,−1,0 +12H
−1ζ3 −18H−2,0,0 +8H
−1,−2,0 −16H−1,−1ζ2 +24H
−1,−1,0,0 +16H−1,−1,2
+18H−1,0ζ2 −16H
−1,0,0,0 −4H−1,2,0 −16H
−1,3 −5H0ζ3 −8H0,0ζ2 +4H0,0,0,0 +2H3,0
−
679
ζ2 +679
H0,0 +8H4
]
+(1
x− x2
)[16619162
+223
H2,0 −552
ζ3 −112
H0ζ2 −679
H2 −679
H1,0
−
413108
H1 −112
H1ζ2 +332
H1,0,0
]
+11(1x
+ x2)[71
54H0 −
16
H3 −389198
ζ2 −23
H−2,0 −
12
H−1ζ2
+H−1,−1,0 −
523198
H−1,0 +
83
H−1,0,0 +H
−1,2
]
+(1− x)[31
36H1 +
272
H1,0 −252
H1,0,0 −4H−3,0
−
26312
H0,0 −293
H0,0,0 −193
H−2,0 −
11317108
−4H−2ζ2 −8H
−2,−1,0 −12H−2,0,0 −
32
H1ζ2
]
+(1+ x)[27
2H0ζ2 −
436
H3 +293
H2,0 +4651216
H0 −32918
ζ2 +112
(1+ x)ζ3 −435
ζ22−
2156
H−1,0
−22H0,0ζ2 −8H0ζ3 −3H−1,−1,0 +38H
−1,0,0 +25H−1,2 +10H2,0,0 −4H2ζ2 +16H3,0 +26H4
−
1589
H2 −532
H−1ζ2
]
−29H0,0 −403
H0,0,0 +27H−2,0 +
413
H0ζ2 −20H3 −24H2,0 +536
ζ2
+60112
H0 +24ζ3 +2ζ22 +27H2 −4H0,0ζ2 −16H0ζ3 −16H
−3,0 +28xH0,0,0,0 +δ(1− x)[79
32
−ζ2ζ3 +16
ζ2 +1124
ζ22 +
676
ζ3 −5ζ5
])
+16CFnf2(2
9x2
[116
H0 +H2 −ζ2 +2H0,0 −9]
+13
H2
−
13
ζ2 −103
H0 −13
H0,0 +2+29(1x− x2)
[83
H1 −2H1,0 −H1,1 −7718
]
− (1− x)[1
3H1,0 +
16
H1,1
+49
+136
H1 + xH1
]
+13(1+ x)
[689
H0 −43
H2 +43
ζ2 +296
H0,0 −ζ3 +2H0ζ2 −H0,0,0 −2H3
−H2,1 −2H2,0
]
+11
144δ(1− x)
)
+16CF2nf
(43
x2[163
16+
278
H0 +72
H0,0 −H2,0 −ζ2 +94
H1,0
−H2,1 +12
H0,0,0 +8516
H1 +H2 −2H−2,0 −
32
ζ3
]
+43(1x− x2)
[3116
H1 −1116
−
54
H1,0 +12
H1,0,0
−H1ζ2 −H1,1 +H1,1,0 +H1,1,1 +ζ3
]
+43(1x
+ x2)[
H−1ζ2 +2H
−1,−1,0 −H−1,0,0
]
+21512
H0,0
+203
H0 −131
6+3H2,0 +
20512
xζ2 −3H1,0 +H2,1 −8512
H1 +114
H2 +8H−2,0 +2ζ2
2−H0ζ2
+H3 +6H0ζ3 +8H−3,0 −4xH0,0,0 +(1− x)
[10712
H1 −56
H1,0 −4ζ2 +H0ζ3 −8H−2,−1,0
−4H−2ζ2 +4H
−2,0,0 −4H1ζ2 +72
H1,0,0 −7
12H1,1 +H1,1,0 +H1,1,1
]
+(1+ x)[5
4H2 +
338
−
994
H0,0 −8H2,0 −54124
H0 −4H2,1 −32
H0,0,0 −2xζ3 +92
ζ22 +5H0ζ2 −5H3 −4H
−1ζ2
−8H−1,−1,0 +
673
H−1,0 +4H
−1,0,0 +2H0,0ζ2 −2H0,0,0,0 −4H2ζ2 +3H2,0,0 +2H2,1,0
+2H2,1,1 +H3,1 −2H4
]
+1
16δ(1− x)
)
.
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.22
NLO C@
Coefficient functions in DIS at three loopsS.M., Vermaseren, Vogt ‘05
Exact (analytical) results for coefficient functions of F2 and FL
fill O(100) pages (normalsize fonts)
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.23
Summary
Symbolic summation
Polynomial summation −→ solved in Mathematica, Maple, ...
Hypergeometric summation −→ algorithms of Gosper, Wilf-Zeilberger
Harmonic summation −→ algebraic structures, recursion relations
Beyond −→ generalizations ...
Examples in particle physicsFeynman diagram calculations
QCD splitting functions
...
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.24
Summary
Symbolic summation
Polynomial summation −→ solved in Mathematica, Maple, ...
Hypergeometric summation −→ algorithms of Gosper, Wilf-Zeilberger
Harmonic summation −→ algebraic structures, recursion relations
Beyond −→ generalizations ...
Examples in particle physicsFeynman diagram calculations
QCD splitting functions
...
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.24
Summary
Symbolic summation
Polynomial summation −→ solved in Mathematica, Maple, ...
Hypergeometric summation −→ algorithms of Gosper, Wilf-Zeilberger
Harmonic summation −→ algebraic structures, recursion relations
Beyond −→ generalizations ...
Examples in particle physicsFeynman diagram calculations
QCD splitting functions
...
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.24
Summary
Symbolic summation
Polynomial summation −→ solved in Mathematica, Maple, ...
Hypergeometric summation −→ algorithms of Gosper, Wilf-Zeilberger
Harmonic summation −→ algebraic structures, recursion relations
Beyond −→ generalizations ...
Examples in particle physicsFeynman diagram calculations
QCD splitting functions
...
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.24
Summary
Symbolic summation
Polynomial summation −→ solved in Mathematica, Maple, ...
Hypergeometric summation −→ algorithms of Gosper, Wilf-Zeilberger
Harmonic summation −→ algebraic structures, recursion relations
Beyond −→ generalizations ...
Examples in particle physicsFeynman diagram calculations
QCD splitting functions
...
Sven-Olaf Moch Symbolic Summation and Higher Orders in Perturbation Theory – p.24