Swell Packer Case Histories

32
Swell Packer case histories FORCE Stavanger, April 2004 Rune Freyer

Transcript of Swell Packer Case Histories

Page 1: Swell Packer Case Histories

Swell Packer case histories

FORCE Stavanger, April 2004Rune Freyer

Page 2: Swell Packer Case Histories

Contents• Rubber swelling• Swell Packer • Constrictor• Installations• Applications

Page 3: Swell Packer Case Histories

Rubber swelling• Thermodynamic absorption rubber/oil• Continued expansion until equilibrium• Swelling pressure 3-6bar• Reduced mechanical properties, not degradation• No swelling in pure water• Traces of oil in flowing water enough

Swelling pressure measurement

Page 4: Swell Packer Case Histories

Dimensions and design• Fully flexible OD/base pipe dimensions• Small clearance (7.9-8.15” OD–8.5” hole)

Page 5: Swell Packer Case Histories

Estimated/correlated ∆P

5.5”

6.625”

7”

8.15”

20406080

100120140160180200

8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5Hole ID (inch)

DP

(bar

)

4.5" base pipe

5.5" base pipe

6.625" base pipe

7" base pipe

Simulation live Simulation dead

Page 6: Swell Packer Case Histories

Swell Packer for oil based mud• Delays swelling to run in hole• OBM at 106°C for 3days• 3 layer construction• 8 wells with 42 packers• So far 50-124 °C

7,15

7,35

7,55

7,75

7,95

8,15

8,35

8,55

0 1 2 3 4 5 7 10 12 14 18 26 38

Diffusion barrier + Low swellLow swell outer layerWBM Packer

2 0 °C 76 °C 10 6 °C

O il B as ed M ud C rud e 10 6 º

D iffus io n b a rrie r lo os es e ffe ct

Page 7: Swell Packer Case Histories

ConstrictorTM alternative to gravel pack

• Limit annular solids transport• Avoid logistics, rig cost, fluids and risk

• Short (300mm) elements• Slide onto base pipe • Not a testable seal• +/-6” and 8.5” OH• Flexible OD

Constrictor application

Page 8: Swell Packer Case Histories

Splice less cable feed through

Splice less application

PS! Better installation tool

designed shortly

Page 9: Swell Packer Case Histories

Advantages• Self repairing, continues to expand• Rugged construction• Set at BHST• Logistics/setting

– No rig time, wash pipe, tools, pumping

• No environmental impact• Track record

Page 10: Swell Packer Case Histories

Applications

Gravel pack Replacement

Multilateraljunction

OHCarbonate Stimulation/ water control

Replace cementin reservoir / perf

SmartWell

Mechanical inflowcontrol

OHstraddle

OHFrac

Steam control

ExpandableCH

straddle

OH screenisolation

DTS

HPHT

Gas wells

Page 11: Swell Packer Case Histories

Installations• 197packers installed in 43 wells• 24 packers in 5 installations through windows• 9 wells with 64 packers verified, no failure• 41 packers installed in 8 wells in OBM

OH carbonate fracDraw down test of integrityNorsk Hydro, GraneStatoil Heidrun gravel packStatoil Snorre B smart wellStatoil Gullfaks Sat smart wellShell Nigeria 3 zone smart wellShell Malaysia OH isolationShell North Cormorant TTRD

Page 12: Swell Packer Case Histories

The end

(Or just the end of the beginning…….)

Page 13: Swell Packer Case Histories

Rep

eat u

nit

• Can use OBM - hole stability• Avoid annular flow – no plugging• Robust screens• Eliminate gravel pack - cheaper

Line

r han

ger

Swel

l Pac

ker

Sand

scr

eens

Con

stric

tor

Page 14: Swell Packer Case Histories

Shell North CormorantCementing problemsSlim hole sidetrackIntermittent blank and preperforatedOil based mud110°CDogleg in window 18deg

Page 15: Swell Packer Case Histories

TTRD Achievements 2003

CN24S3CN14S2CN32S4

CN-18S5CN-29S3

CN-13S1/2CN-17S1CA-28S3BB-14S2

CN-24S2CN-18S6

PAST TTRD wells First 2 wells 2003 Second 2 wells 2003 Fifth well 2003 Tomorrow

Past Achievements: • Max KOP 12344 ft• Max OH 3200 ft• Hole sizes 4.5” to 5”• Liner size 2 7/8” 3.5”• Bi-centre bit tech • Slotted 2-7/8” Liner• K-Formate Mud• ARC3 Real Time

PWD

Well Complexity

Well Cost

Improvements• ROP – Bits/Agitator• Directional Control• Casing Exits• Equipment Mngmnt• Mud (Micromax)• Well Control (Radar)• Abandonment

Improvements:•Mud (Micromax)

•Higher MWs >700pptf• Well Control

• New philosophy• Cementing

• A annulus isolations• Spacers improved

• Cleanout improvements

Improvements:• SqueezeCrete success• Zonal isolation with

Swelling packers• Eliminate clean-outs• Eliminate perforating

Page 16: Swell Packer Case Histories

CN24s3 CN24s3 –– A Step Change in TTRD designA Step Change in TTRD design

Swelling Packers Technology (EWS)Swelling Packers Technology (EWS)CN24s3 CN24s3 -- A first in UK North Sea and in A first in UK North Sea and in

TTRD applicationTTRD applicationEliminate cementing of 2-7/8” liner and subsequent clean-out of liner

Potential for more effective zonal isolation in small hole sizes with high drawdown/differential pressuresElimination of cement debris following clean-up saving £350k – 1,000k per TTRD well (15-30% of total well cost)

Potential to eliminate perforating£400k – 750k per TTRD well for CT

Provide a step change in economics30-100% increase in VIR for slim holes

Page 17: Swell Packer Case Histories

North Cormorant 12 Day WellsNorth Cormorant 12 Day Wells

12750

13000

13250

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

15250

15500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Dril

led

Dep

th (f

eet)

AFE CN24s3

Actual CN24s3

Possible with today's technology

EXPECTATION12d wells

NORTH CORMORANTTODAY

TTRD with swelling packers completion

EXPECTATION12d wells

CN24s3 – 5th Well of TTRD campaign producing 90% OILHIGHLIGHTSHIGHLIGHTS•Milled Dual Exit Window in one successful run.

•SqueezeCrete slurry exceeded expectations for cement repair

•Excellent performance - Shoe to shoe drilling - 3.9 days Avg ROP 48fph

•New technologyBHA design – 17.5deg DLS achieved with motor & agitator

Micromax-weighted OBM. Lower ECD’s and virtually NO sag!

Swelling packers for zonal isolation – cut down on rig time and good zonal isolation

•Swelling packers – Eliminated cementing & CT perforating

•Good hole conditions through use of PWD tool.

Lost TimeLost Time• Twist-off in NMDC – however successfully fished in one run!

• Minor environmental discharge (0.6m3 oil) to sea

consequential to OBM taken through production facilities

• CT had to be used with N2 in order to lift the well offline

TODAY’S REALITY – 12 DAY WELL TIMESSwelling packers – A Step change in performance

Page 18: Swell Packer Case Histories

18 5/8" casing shoe

10 3/4" liner

FBIV @ 2055,26 m MD (closed pos.)

7" blank pipe

Template

30" casing shoe

13 3/8" casing shoe

10 3 /4" casing shoe

Template funnel

10 3/4" tie-back string

ZXP packer

Swell Packerson screen joints

Liner hanger / ZXP - packer

7" screen section

Top screen PBR @ 2014,76 m MD

10 ¾” top PBR

RA tracer subSilver-110M

1.25 S.G. NaCl POLYMER BRINE

4 Swell Packers mounted onone joint of 7" blank pipe

Bullnose @ 3539 m MD

9 1/2" open hole to TD @ 3540 m MD

1.06 s.gNaCl Brine

Completion fluid for the screen section: 1,25 s.g. Na/K-COOH formate mud

RA tracer subCobalt-60

2 screen joints

10 3/4" SC-1 plug @ 300 m MD (upper barrier)

Shale intervals:2190-2240 m MD 3149-3166 m MD2290-2330 m MD 3196-3213 m MD2456-2480 m MD 3238-3274 m MD2514-2575 m MD 3310-3402 m MD2723-2767 m MD 3425-3429 m MD2802-2895 m MD

Value:Reduced cost 800kUSD/well compared to ECPs2 less runsReduced risk for installation failuresIncreased production by reduced pluggingVerified by PLT

Page 19: Swell Packer Case Histories

Case 1: Swell Packers in Grane

• Emulsion• 19API crude

• Demobilize shale particles in annulus• Pressure isolation of screen annulus• 800kUSD/two runs saved/well• “Heaven compared to inflatables” (NH rigrep)

Page 20: Swell Packer Case Histories

SF-37 Final Completion Diagram

FINAL WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAM @ a.h.bthfSABAH SHELL PETROLEUM CO. LTD

Well No : SF-37 Location : SFJT-BWellhead Type : Cameron Triple Wellhead + Single X’Mas treeTubing : 3.1/2” 9.2# L80 K.Fox (Conventional S/String )

Date Completed : All Depth in Ft. AH.BTHF Maximum Dev. : 63.4° @ 4426’-6784’ ahbthf

StatusMinID

Long StringDepth

3.1/2”Flow Coupling3.1/2” TRSCSSV

3 1/2” SSD

2.910

2.813

2.750

13.3/8” Casing Shoe@ 949’ 3.1/2” SPM 2.875

516

7” Seal stem located with half mu le shoe

6.250 7.000

Swell Packer

9.5/8” Casing Shoe@ 3985’

3.1/2” SPM

2.992

Swell Packer

Swell Packer

3.1/2” Bull nose 2.992

6 1/8” Open holeTD: 6784’

Blank Tubing 2.992

Swell Packer

Swell Packer

Predrilled Tubing

2.992

Blank Tubing 2.992

Top of 7” PBR3696’

2.992

2.992

2.992

2.992

2.992

2.992

3 1/2” SSD 2.750

3 1/2” X-Nipple 2.750

3 1/2” X-Nipple 2.750

3 1/2” X-Nipple 2.750

Swell Packer 2.992

999

16592100263531053606

Predrilled Tubing

Predrilled Tubing

53755366

5298

46804655

4478

43794354

40414015

3866

3700

Closed

BKR-5BKR-5

BKR-5

3.1/2” SPM 3.1/2” SPM

3.1/2” SPM 3.1/2” SPM

Closed

DKO-2DMYDMY

Closed

No Plug

No Plug

No Plug

4th July 2003

3669

SF37:SF-37's water cut has come down from ~95% to 0! This is very good proof of the packers working!

– 6-18” Open Hole– 5,7” Packer OD– 3-1/2” Lower completion

Page 21: Swell Packer Case Histories

FINAL WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAM@ ah.bdf SABAH SHELL PETROLEUM CO. LTD

Well No : SF-38 Location : SFJT-BWellhead Type : Cameron Triple Wellhead + Single X’Mas treeTubing : 3.1/2” 9.2# L80 K.Fox (Conventional S/String )

Date Completed : All Depth in Ft. AH.BDF @ 71 ft elevationMaximum Dev. : 61.5° @ 4403’-7416’ ahbdf

MinIDLong StringDepth

3.1/2”Flow Coupling3.1/2” TRSCSSV

3 1/2” SSD

2.9102.813

2.750

13.3/8” Casing Shoe@ 1051’ 3.1/2” SPM + BKR-5 2.875

594

7” Seal stem located with half mule shoe

6.250

Swell Packer No.2

9.5/8” Casing Shoe@ 3484’

3.1/2” SPM + BKR-5

Swell Packer No.3

Swell Packer No.5

3.1/2” Bull nose6 1/8” Open holeTD: 7393’

Swell Packer No.7

Swell Packer No.8

2.992

Predrilled Tubing

Top of 7” PBR@ 3195’

3 1/2” SSD 2.750Sand Screens

2.992

3 1/2” SSD

2.7503 1/2” X-Nipple

Swell Packer No.4

7811440200624462855

Predrilled Tubing

Blank TubingMin ID:2.992, Max. OD: 3.900

3200

3.1/2” SPM + BKR-5 3.1/2” SPM + DKO-23.1/2” SPM + DMY

MaxOD

5.000

4.281

5.620

7.000

3.900

4.2814.000

3.905

3170

Swell Packer No.1

2.992 5.700

Blank Tubing

2.992 4.000

Blank TubingMin ID:2.992, Max. OD: 3.900

Swell Packer No.6

3 1/2” XN-Nipple 2.635 3.905Swell Packer No.9Predrilled Tubing

Blank TubingMin ID:2.992, Max. OD: 3.900

ZONE-1A

ZONE-2

ZONE-3

ZONE-4Swell Packer No.10

ZONE-1B

6855

634762756250

553553165290

456545414516

4305Blank Tubing

42344259

3610

3 1/2” X-Nipple 2.750 3.905

2.992 5.700

2.992 5.700

2.992 5.700

2.992 5.700

2.992 5.700

2.992 5.7003430

15th July 2003 SF-38 Final Completion

Diagram

1500 BOPD against 1400 promised

0% water cut Sand = 2 pptb

545 psi FTHP (so there's plenty of room to bean up from current 28/64")

GOR = 238 scf/STB

The GOR is VERY encouraging because there is a gas sand present.

This GOR is LOWER than many Rev. 2 wells with more expensive completions.

Page 22: Swell Packer Case Histories

SF Rev3 Budget versus EFC

47

66

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Budget EFC

Wel

l Cos

t RM

'000 SF 39

SF 38SF 37

-29%

Cost Performance

SF Average well cost comparison

16

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

Well cost Rev2 Well cost Rev3

Wel

l Cos

t (R

M M

illio

n)

BudgetEFC

-26%

Savings on:- Liners- Cement- Cleanout- ESS (now Poromax)- Scraper runs- Perforation runs- Packers- Completion equipment

Page 23: Swell Packer Case Histories

Cost Performance

SF Rev.2 and Rev.3 BenchmarkingCost per foot (Rm/ft) comparison

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

SF-31 SF-32 SF-33 SF-34 SF-35 SF-36 SF-37 SF-38 SF-39 AvgRev2

AvgRev3

RM

per

ft

Budget

Actual (EFC)

+2% -29%

Page 24: Swell Packer Case Histories

Conclusions

– Significantly Cheaper Wells– Installation relatively easy– Production / Packer working very encouraging– Can do even cheaper

Page 25: Swell Packer Case Histories
Page 26: Swell Packer Case Histories

Snorre B Well D-4H Completion schematic

Drawing: 1 Date: 18.09.2003File: D-4Hcomplettering skisse.pptRev: 3

Packer depths:

Prod. Packer: 3192 m MDIso. packer #1: 3586 m MDIso. packer #2: 4116 m MDIso. packer #3: 4611 m MD

TOC = 3013 m MD

Casing depths:13 3/8”: 380 – 2178 m MD

Liner depths:9 5/8” liner: 2111.5 – 4273 m MD7x5 1/2” screen: 4347 – 4973 m MD

Tubing:7”, 13 Cr-80, 29 lbs/ft NSCC5 ½”, 13 Cr-80, 20 lbs/ft Vam Top5 ½”, 13 Cr-80, 23 lbs/ft Vam Top4 ½”, 13 Cr-80, 13.5 lbs/ft NSCT

7” DHSV@ 606 m MD

5 ½”

Lunde

ClampsPP

@ 3

192

m

IP @

358

6 m

IP @

411

6 m

IP @

461

1 m

4 ½”

7” tubing

Sone #4Sone #3Sone #2Sone #1

5 ½”5 ½”

Swell Packers

Value:Sand production expected in perforations at water onset

Reduced erosion risk of smart well equipmentNo down hole operations during installationLong packers ensure efficient sealingVerified by downhole gauges

Page 27: Swell Packer Case Histories

Case 2: Down hole test

• 8,15” OD WBM, 7” perforated liner• 8-1/2” Open hole • Coiled tubing deployed test plug• Successfully inflow tested• February 2003

P

Page 28: Swell Packer Case Histories

Case 3: Isolation in Carbonates (1/3)2380 meters horizontal reservoir section

8-1/2" Hole9-5/8” Casing Shoe

WBM, 7.9” OD5-1/2” preperforated liner

Page 29: Swell Packer Case Histories

Case 3: Isolation in Carbonates (2/3)

3-1/2” Inner isolation string (2.992” ID) SSD (OD - 3.92”, ID - 2.31”)WBM 4,4” x 3-1/2” - 4m

Page 30: Swell Packer Case Histories

Case 3: Isolation in Carbonates (3/3)

8-1/2" Hole9-5/8” Casing Shoe

5-1/2" Perforated liner3.5" tubing

Liner – Annulus IsolationTubing – Liner Isolation Isolated and controlled production interval

Page 31: Swell Packer Case Histories

Hole ID DP [bar] %

Swell Packer simulations 5.73 246 305.742 0 1 20.0 % 5.77 196 405.753 1 1 22.0 % 5.80 156 48

For: 5.765 1 2 24.0 % 5.83 116 57Date: 5.776 1 2 26.0 % 5.87 76 69

By: 5.788 1 2 28.0 % 5.93 36 855.799 1 3 30.0 %5.811 1 3 32.0 %

Input 5.822 2 4 34.0 % 5.99 16 102Pipe OD 5.000 in 127 mm 5.834 2 4 36.0 %Packer OD 5.625 in 143 mm 5.845 2 5 38.0 % DP [Psi]

5.856 2 5 40.0 % 3567Down hole viscosity 1.50 cP 5.868 2 6 42.0 % 2842Hole ID 6.000 in 152.4 mm 5.879 3 6 44.0 % 2262Operational pressure 50 bar 5.890 3 7 46.0 % 1682

5.902 3 7 48.0 % 11025.913 3 8 50.0 % 522

Output 5.924 4 9 52.0 %Final OD (20bar DP) 6.031 in 153.2 mm 5.935 4 9 54.0 %Volume swell % at Hole ID 106% 5.946 4 10 56.0 % 232Time to fully set max DP 35 days 5.958 5 11 58.0 %Time to operational pressure N/A days 5.969 5 12 60.0 %Time to first seal 15 days 5.980 5 13 62.0 %DP at "Hole ID" 212 psi 15 bar a 5.991 6 13 64.0 %

6.002 6 14 66.0 %6.013 6 15 68.0 %

Input 6.024 7 16 70.0 %Cable OD 0.25 in 6.350 mm 6.035 7 17 72.0 %Number of cables 2 Insufficient rubber thickness 6.046 8 18 74.0 %

6.057 8 19 76.0 %Pressure calculations are based on failure pressure of a 3m long element, modified with 20% safety factor. 6.068 8 20 78.0 %A longer packer will enable higher differential pressure but exact correlations are not mapped. 6.079 9 21 80.0 %Timing of swelling process will vary dependent of fluid circulation and is based on WBM construction. 6.090 9 22 82.0 %Timing of swelling in gas may be estimated by EWSOBM construction will take longer time. 6.101 10 23 84.0 %EWS advise designs with differential pressure exceeding simulated limitations also allowing for washouts. 6.112 10 24 86.0 %

6.122 11 26 88.0 %Oil Field Units SI Units 6.133 11 27 90.0 %

Temperature 280.4 °F 138 °CBase pipe wt 12.6 ppf 18.8 kg/mBase pipe length 19.7 ft 6 mElement length 9.8 ft 3 mPacker weight excl pipe 26.2 lbs 11.9 kgPacker mass 274.3 lbs 124.5 kgPacker volume 0.357 ft^3 0.010 115%

Differential pressure profile

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

5.70 5.75 5.80 5.85 5.90 5.95 6.00

Hole ID [in]

Diff

eren

tial p

ress

ure

[bar

]

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Diff

eren

tial p

ress

ure

[Psi

]

Swell profile

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

5.70 5.75 5.80 5.85 5.90 5.95 6.00 6.05 6.10 6.15 6.20

Hole ID [in]

Tim

e to

sw

ell [

days

]

Time to sealTime to fully set

Page 32: Swell Packer Case Histories

Splice less cable feed through• Competent formation• One string• No cable splicing at packers