Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

25
2/21/2007 NNCI 2007 Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk Interplay between disorder and interactions in two dimensions

description

Interplay between disorder and interactions in two dimensions. Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk. One-parameter scaling theory for non-interacting electrons: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

Page 1: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Sveta Anissimova

Sergey Kravchenko(presenting author)

A. Punnoose

A. M. Finkelstein

Teun Klapwijk

Interplay between disorder and interactions in two dimensions

Page 2: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

3D

2D 1D

MIT

ln(G)

d(lnG)/d(lnL) = (G)

One-parameter scaling theory for non-interacting electrons: the origin of the common wisdom “all states are localized in 2D”

Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello, and Ramakrishnan, PRL 42, 673 (1979)

G ~ Ld-2 exp(-L/Lloc)

metal (dG/dL>0)insulator

insulator

insulator (dG/dL<0)

Ohm’s law in d dimensions

QM interference

Page 3: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

However, the existence of the quantum Hall effect is inconsistent with this prediction

Solution (Pruisken, Khmelnitskii…):two-parameter (xx, xy) scaling theory

Page 4: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Do the electron-electron interactions modify the“all states are localized in 2D at B=0” paradigm?

(what happens to the Anderson transition in the presence of interactions?)

Page 5: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Corrections to conductivity due to electron-electron interactions in the diffusive regime (T < 1)

always insulating behavior

However, later this result was shown to be incorrect

Page 6: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Zeitschrift fur Physik B (Condensed Matter) -- 1984 -- vol.56, no.3, pp. 189-96

Weak localization and Coulomb interaction in disordered systems

Finkel'stein, A.M. L.D. Landau Inst. for Theoretical Phys., Acad. of Sci., Moscow, USSR

0

02

2 1ln131ln

2 F

FT

e

Insulating behavior when interactions are weak Metallic behavior when interactions are strongEffective strength of interactions grows as the temperature decreases

Altshuler-Aronov-Lee’s result Finkelstein’s & Castellani-

DiCastro-Lee-Ma’s term

)45.01( 0 F)045.0( 0 F

Page 7: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Same mechanism persists to ballistic regime (T> 1), but corrections become linear in temperature

where C(ns) < 0

This is reminiscent of earlier Stern-Das Sarma’s result

(However, Das Sarma’s calculations are not applicable to strongly interacting regime because at r s>1, the screening length becomes smaller than the separation between electrons.)

Page 8: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

What do experiments show?

Page 9: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Strongly disordered Si MOSFET

(Pudalov et al.)

Consistent with the one-parameter scaling theory

Page 10: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Kravchenko, Mason, Bowker, Furneaux, Pudalov, and D’Iorio, PRB 1995

Clean Si MOSFET, much lower electron densities

Page 11: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Klapwijk’s sample: Pudalov’s sample:

In very clean samples, the transition is practically universal:

103

104

105

106

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0.86x1011 cm-2

0.880.900.930.950.991.10

resi

stiv

ity

r (O

hm)

temperature T (K)

(Note: samples from different sources, measured in different labs)

Page 12: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

103

104

105

106

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0.86x1011 cm-2

0.880.900.930.950.991.10

resistiv

ity r

(Ohm

)

temperature T (K)

clean sample: disordered sample:

… in contrast to strongly disordered samples:

Clearly, one-parameter scaling theory does not work here

Page 13: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Again, two-parameter scaling theory comes to the rescue

Page 14: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

finite rincreases

while reduces r the interplay of disorder and r and interaction changes the trend and gives non-monotonic R(T)

2 22

2

2

22 2

11 ( ) ln(1 ) 1

(1

)

)

1

2

(4v v

dnn

d

d

d

r r

r

cooperon singlet “triplet”

ln(1/ ) , 1T T

Two parameter scaling

to all orders in 2

(Finkelstein, 1983-1984;Castellani, Di Castro, Lee, and Ma, 1984;Punnoose and Finkelstein, 2002; 2005)

Page 15: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Punnoose and Finkelstein, Science310, 289 (2005)

interactions

diso

rde

r

metallic phase stabilized by e-e interaction

disorder takes over

QCP

Page 16: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Low-field magnetoconductance in the diffusive regime yields strength of electron-electron interactions

1

2

Tk

Bg

B

B

22

22

2

1091.0

4,

T

B

k

g

h

eTB

B

B

Experimental test of the Punnoose-Finkelstein theoryFirst, one needs to ensure that the system is in the diffusive regime (T< 1).

One can distinguish between diffusive and ballistic regimes by studying magnetoconductance:

2

,

T

BTB

TBTB

2

,

- diffusive: low temperatures, higher disorder (Tt < 1).

- ballistic: low disorder, higher temperatures (Tt > 1).

The exact formula for magnetoconductance (Lee and Ramakrishnan, 1982):

Page 17: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Experimental results (low-disordered Si MOSFETs; “just metallic” regime; ns= 9.14x1010 cm-2):

Page 18: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Temperature dependences of the resistance (a) and strength of interactions (b)

This is the first time effective strength of interactions has been seen to depend on T

Page 19: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Experimental disorder-interaction flow diagram of the 2D electron liquid

Page 20: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Experimental vs. theoretical flow diagram(qualitative comparison b/c the 2-loop theory was developed for multi-valley systems)

Page 21: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Quantitative predictions of the two-parameter scaling theory for 2-valley systems

(Punnoose and Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002)

Solutions of the RG-equations:a series of non-monotonic curves r(T). After rescaling, the solutions are described by a single universal curve:

max

max max

ρ(T) = ρ R(η)

η = ρ ln(T /T)

r(T

)

(T)

rmax ln(T/Tmax)

Tmax

rmax

2 = 0.45

For a 2-valley system (like Si MOSFET),

metallic r(T) sets in when 2 > 0.45

Page 22: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Resistance and interactions vs. T

Note that the metallic behavior sets in when 2 ~ 0.45, exactly as predicted by the RG theory

Page 23: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Comparison between theory (lines) and experiment (symbols)(no adjustable parameters used!)

Page 24: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

Si-MOSFET vs. GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures

Si-MOSFET advantages

Moderately high mobility: There exists a diffusive window T < 1/ < EF; 1/ = 2-3 K

Short range scattering: Anderson transition in a disordered Fermi Liquid (universal)

Two-valley system: Effects of electron-electron interactions are enhanced (“critical” 2=0.45 vs. 2.04 in a single-valley system)

GaAs/AlGaAs:

Ultra high mobility: Diffusive regime is hard to reach; 1/ < 100-200 mK

Long range scattering: Percolation type of the transition?

Very low density: Non-degeneracy effects; possible Wigner crystallization,..

Page 25: Sveta Anissimova Sergey Kravchenko (presenting author) A. Punnoose A. M. Finkelstein Teun Klapwijk

2/21/2007 NNCI 2007

It is demonstrated, for the first time, that as a result of the interplay between the electron-electron interactions and disorder, not only the resistance but also the interaction strength exhibits a fan-like spread as the metal-insulator transition is crossed.

Conclusions:

Resistance-interaction flow diagram of the MIT clearly reveals a quantum critical point, as predicted by renormalization-group theory of Punnoose and Finkelstein.

The metallic side of this diagram is accurately described by the renormalization-group theory without any fitting parameters. In particular, the metallic temperature dependence of the resistance sets in once 2 > 0.45, which is in remarkable agreement with RG theory.

The interactions between electrons stabilize the metallic state in 2D and lead to the existence of a critical fixed point