Sustainable Accreditation and Learning in International Rehabilitation Professional Development
-
Upload
alan-bruce -
Category
Education
-
view
344 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Sustainable Accreditation and Learning in International Rehabilitation Professional Development
SUSTAINABLE ACCREDITATION AND LEARNING IN
INTERNATIONAL REHABILITATION
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1EDEN 2011
Ireland Alan Bruce, Universal Learning Systems
United StatesDavid Perry, University of North Dakota
Michelle Marmé, Northeastern Illinois University Chrisann Schiro Geist, University of Memphis
Regina Robertson, East Central Oklahoma University
Sustainable Accreditation Learning (beyond WHAT is taught… what knowledge & skills are acquired)
International Rehabilitation Professional Globalization
Overview
2EDEN 2011
Change dynamic Impact of crisis Imperatives of continuing professional
development Standards and quality Ethical practice
Contexts of Inclusive Practice
3EDEN 2011
Using the Experienc
e of Disability
Beyond Barriers
to Shared Excellenc
e
From Compe-tence to
Creativity
European Challeng
es
American Perspect-
ives
Innovative Learning
4EDEN 2011
Thinking Globally
Anticipating Future
Demogra-phics
ICT & Supporte
d Systems
Policy and Trans-
formation
Linkage and Recognition
5EDEN 2011
Globally, there are almost 1 billion people with disabilities (PWD)
Estimates of PWD by continent: Europe – 98 million, Africa – 137 million, Asia – 553 million, North America – 67 million, South America – 57 million
U.N. estimates 13.3 % of world population has some form of disability
While “disability” is defined differently in different countries, the U.N. offers these definitions:
Impairment: “any loss or abnormality of psychological, physiological, or anatomical structure or function” Disability: a “restriction or lack (resulting from an impairment) of ability to perform an activity in the manner or within the range considered normal for a human being”
People with Disabilities
6EDEN 2011
EDEN 2011
Supporting Independence
Social Dynamics of Marginalized Populations
Interpersonal Communication & Advocacy Skills
Medical Services Physical Restoration Psychological Supports Independent Living Housing & Transportation Community Living Skills Avocational Pursuits Spiritual Development Vocational & Job/Career Development Legal Rights and Recourse
7
EDEN 2011
A variety of services are offered to help PWD become more independent, such as: medical services, physical restoration, psychological supports, job placement, housing services, transportation assistance, communication aides, and assistive technology.
Rehabilitation Service providers receive various kinds of training, ranging from on-the-job training to college degrees.
Higher education programs often seek accreditation to demonstrate the quality and sustainability of their degrees.
Interventions and Training
8
Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE)
EDEN 2011
9
Has offered accreditation of master’s programs in Rehabilitation Counseling since 1972
Accredits approximately 100 programs in the United States
Is recognized by the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), an organization that certifies a variety of international accrediting bodies (e.g., engineering and business)
Commission on Undergraduate Standards and Accreditation
(CUSA)
EDEN 2011
10
This commission is part or CORE and is responsible for sanctioning quality undergraduate rehabilitation education programs
The goal is to promote the effective delivery of services to individuals
Services improve when professionals receive better training
Accreditation standards promote continuing review and improvement of high quality training programs
Maximizing participation of people with disabilities
in mainstream of life
Creativity Commitment Collaboration
EDEN 2011
11
International Rehabilitation Education
Building on firm foundation fromCORE and CUSA, our goal is to providean opportunity for other countries tohave their training programs recognized
Advantages include programmatic review
with respect to established standards of quality, economic viability, sustainability, portability of credentials,course transferability, and unified ethical codes
EDEN 2011
12
Profession defines fundamental standards of practice and essential knowledge
Students’ best interests & educational goals protected Strengths of Existing Models
Protocols to follow, refine, & modify for new contexts Structured process of self-reflection for programs Asynchronous sharing of information Data gathering from constituents “Outside” review & validation from profession
Educational institutions & programs are acknowledged for developing/providing “best practice”
Accreditation 13
EDEN 2011
Accreditation as a Growth Process
EDEN 2011 14
Voluntarily organized, by educators, to develop and implement common policies and standards, to evaluate educational quality
Non-governmental, entirely voluntary, peer review, ensuring educational programs meet educational and professional standards of quality
Consider faculty academic preparation, demonstrated excellence, programmatic recruitment practices and admissions procedures, course content
Outcome measures with respect to knowledge and skill attainment, from the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders: supervisors, employers, graduates
People with
Disabilities
Pedagogy
Standards
Accredita-tion
Technology
Process of Continual Refinement
15
EDEN 2011
Establishing and supporting “best practice”
Reimagine “accreditation” as Growth-oriented Supportive Enhancing outcomes Building upon established structures to address
evolving needs of our students and practice Recontextualizing process in light of varying
contexts and technologies
Re-evaluating Accreditation Process
16EDEN 2011
New Modelsof Program Assessment
Consensus: some face-to-face components must be retained To ensure voracity of reports To address physical access in rehabilitation context In the absence* of technological alternatives
Distance models for executing program evaluation & training of evaluators
Virtual training of site visitors More evaluators involved, enhancing the # observers
involved Decreased costs for accreditation review process, increased
cadre of reviewers Multiple perspectives enhances sophistication of process
EDEN 2011
17
Challenges
World becomes flatter Boundaries blur Distinctions become less divisive Definitional considerations Universality of socially-endorsed and
culturally-dependent phrasing & practices
EDEN 2011
18
EDEN 2011
19
Optimum training experiences for individuals
interested in the full inclusion of people with disabilities and differences, will be
met through this refinement of sustainable training and
evaluation methodologies.
EDEN 2011
20
Resources
Council on Rehabilitation Education www.core-rehab.org
National Clearinghouse of Rehabilitation Training Materials
https://ncrtm.org/moodle/
National Council on Rehabilitation Educationwww.rehabeducators.org/resources.html
EDEN 2011
21