SURVEY REPORT ‐ OCTOBER 2018 CONTENT · Ebola. A majority of respondents were able to identify...
Transcript of SURVEY REPORT ‐ OCTOBER 2018 CONTENT · Ebola. A majority of respondents were able to identify...
E a s t e r n D e m o c r a t i c R e p u b l i c o f t h e C o n g o
1ST SURVEY REPORT ‐ OCTOBER 2018 (data from September 2018)
CONTENT
p.3 COMMUNICATION: Awareness about risk and prevention is high. Fewer are informed
about the outbreak situation and state of the response, which is critical to build trust
and overall knowledge.
PATRICK VINCK
PHUONG N. PHAM
ANUPAH MAKOOND
JEAN‐PAUL ZIBIKA
ERIC NILLES p.5 COMMUNICATION: Health professionals are the most trusted source of information
about Ebola but are rarely heard from. Overall trust in sources of information about
Ebola is low.
p.6 COMMUNICATION: Speculations about the reality of the epidemic and its fabrication
for financial or political gains are widespread, especially among women, the poor.
For internal use of those working on the Ebola response. p.7 BEHAVIOR: The epidemic appears to have had, so far, a limited effect on social
interactions, but respondents indicated reduced physical interactions, and most
avoided any risk of exposure to people they suspected were infected or in contact
with infected people.
p.8 MOBILITY: Travels are relatively limited, but higher wealth, education and occupation
as trader are associated with more frequent movements
p.9 BURIAL PRACTICES: Physical contact and exposure of the body of the deceased are
common. Many aspects of safe and dignified burials are unacceptable to
respondents.
p.11 HEALTHCARE: Respondents will turn to hospitals to seek care if they suspect they
have Ebola, but health centers and pharmacies are frequently used. Overall
perception of health professionals is positive. Treatment options are not well known.
p.13 VACCINATION: Vaccines are generally trusted but fewer trust Ebola vaccines.
Perception of risk and lack of clarity in access undermine trust
p.14 TRUST IN THE EBOLA RESPONSE: Trust in institutions is low. While perceptions about
the Ebola response are more positive, few see key actors as contributing to the
response, which may further undermine trust and cohesion.
ABOUT THE SURVEY
This note presents the results of a survey conducted in the cities of Beni and Butembo, North Kivu. A total of 961
randomly selected adult respondents were interviewed over a 10 days period in September 2018. Respondents
were selected using a multistage cluster sampling procedure. We randomly selected 30 avenues in each city. In
each avenue, 16 dwellings were selected using a random geographic procedure. In each dwelling, one adult was
randomly selected for interview. We approached 977 households in the cities of Beni and Butembo to participate in
the survey, of which 10 refused to participate and 6 were empty with no possibility to find members. In the
remaining 961 households composed of 6,094 individuals, we randomly selected 974 adults for interviews. A total
of 10 refused and 3 could not be located. A total of 961 adults (98.3%) were interviewed, 481 in the city of Beni and
480 in the city of Butembo. By design, the survey included 50% women. The average age of respondents was 34
years.
Figure 1: Random selection procedure
Results are representative for each city, with a 5 percent margin of error at a 95 percent level of confidence. The
survey was approved by Brigham and Women’s Hospital Human Research Committee and the Universite Libre des
Pays des Grands Lacs in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Results are adjusted for the complex design and
weighted for unequal probability of sampling.
Acknowledgment:
We would like to thank the participants and interviewers who made this study possible. Juliet Bedford of
Anthrologica provided invaluable comments on the survey instrument. We would also like to thank Christine Prue
of the CDC who provided analytical insights.
For more information, contact:
Patrick Vinck: pvinck@hsph,harvard.edu Phuong Pham: [email protected]
Vinck P, Pham PN, Makoond A, Zibika JP, Nilles E. Ebola Rapid Survey – Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1st survey report.
October 2018. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
30 avenues/ city
16 dwellings / avenue
1 adult / dwelling
977 dwellings approached‐ 10 refused‐ 6 empty
974 adults approached‐ 10 refused
‐ 3 away
961 adults interviewed
Beni: 481Butembo: 480
Men: 481Women: 480
Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 3
COMMUNICATION: Awareness about risk and prevention is high. Fewer are informed about the outbreak situation and state of the response, which is critical to build trust and overall knowledge.
All respondents in the cities of Beni and Butembo heard about Ebola in the last week prior to the survey. They
received information frequently ‐ daily for a majority (64%). The percentage of respondents who heard about Ebola
once a week or less was higher among women (13%) compared to men (2%). A large majority of respondents
report having received information about how to protect themselves from Ebola (92%), the symptoms of Ebola
(85%) or where to go for health care for Ebola (80%). Fewer received information about the overall response to
Ebola (64%) and the situation / cases in the province (64%). Providing more general information about response
effort could help generate support for the response and build trust in implementing actors. It may also address key
concerns respondents expressed about the prognostic after contracting the virus and its spread.
Awareness Frequency of information
(Number of days heard about Ebola per week, on average)
8% once a week or less
Topic of information received Beni Butembo
Despite the high level of awareness and frequent flow of information, almost half the respondents rank their
knowledge of Ebola as bad or very bad (49%). Another 43% ranked their knowledge as average, and just 8% said it
was good or very good. Respondents in Butembo ranked their knowledge poorly (58% bad – very bad) more
frequently than those in Beni (22%). This reflects actual knowledge of symptoms and modes of transmission of
Ebola. A majority of respondents were able to identify symptoms of Ebola like vomiting (74%), diarrhea (73%) and
Heard about
Ebola100%
Every day
64%
2 ‐ 6 days / week
27%
Once
6%
Less than once a
week2%
Never
0%13%
2%
Women Men
92%
85%
80%
72%
64%
64%
How to protect yourself from Ebola
Symptoms of Ebola
Where to go for healthcare for Ebola
What to do if a relative / neighbor has Ebola
Overall response to Ebola
Ebola cases in the province
97%
89%
97%
89%
73%
61%
90%
84%
75%
67%
61%
65%
4 For internal use of those working on the Ebola response.
high fever (70%), but less frequently do in Butembo compared to Beni. Similarly, a majority of respondents knew
key modes of transmission of Ebola like physical contact with someone infected with Ebola (74%) or who died of
Ebola virus disease (62%), as well as handling and eating bush meat (55%), but those in Butembo knew modes of
transmissions less frequently than those in Beni.
Self‐reported knowledge about Ebola (% respondents)
Symptoms and transmission modes (% of respondents) Total Beni Butembo
Symptoms
Transmission
Very bad, 1%
Very bad, 8%
Very bad, 6%
Bad, 21% Bad, 50%
Bad, 43%
Average, 56%
Average, 39%
Average, 43
%
Goo
d, 21%
Goo
d, 3%
Goo
d, 7%
Very good
, 2%
Very good, 0%
Very good
, 1%
Beni Butembo Total (weighted)
74%
73%
70%
55%
35%
22%
16%
11%
10%
5%
1%
74%
62%
55%
46%
33%
19%
8%
1%
Vomiting
Diarrhea
High fever
Acute headaches
Bleeding
Weakness
Tiredness
Muscular pain
Stomach / abdomen pain
Other
No response
Physicalcontact with someone infected by Ebola
Physical contact with someone who died of Ebola
Eating / handling bush meat
Contact with objects tuched by someone infected by Ebola
Contact with bodily fluidsof someone infected by Ebola
Sexual contact with someone infected by Ebola
Sorcery
No response
90%
82%
90%
60%
30%
25%
32%
22%
4%
2%
0%
85%
84%
89%
58%
47%
24%
4%
0%
69%
70%
63%
53%
37%
22%
11%
8%
12%
5%
1%
71%
54%
43%
42%
29%
17%
10%
1%
Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 5
COMMUNICATION: Health professionals are the most trusted source of information about Ebola but are rarely heard from. Overall trust in sources of information about Ebola is low.
As noted, all respondents in the cities of Beni and Butembo heard about Ebola in the last week prior to the survey.
They heard about Ebola from multiple sources, including most frequently their friends and family (89%), local radios
(82%), religious leaders (73%) and national radios (68%). They have less frequently heard from health professionals
like doctors or nurses (53%). Although they hear frequently from these sources, trust in sources of information
about Ebola was relatively low. Just 40% of respondents trusted ‘moderately, a lot or extremely’ their friends and
family as a source of information about Ebola. The percentage trusting formal media was similar, with 46% and 39%
of respondents expressing moderate to high levels of trust in local radios and national radios, respectively. The
most frequently trusted sources of information about Ebola were health professionals (69% moderately ‐
extremely). However, health professionals were less frequently heard from than other less trusted sources. Trust in
authorities and NGOs as a source of information about Ebola was low (23% moderately – extremely for chefs de
quartier, 28% for NGOs). Trust in all sources of information was less frequent in Butembo compared to Beni.
Source of Information about Ebola
(% respondents)
Trust as a source of Information about Ebola
(% moderate to extremely)
Beni Butembo
89%
82%
73%
68%
53%
34%
31%
30%
29%
27%
21%
6%
Friends, family
Local radio
Religious leaders / church
National radio
Health professionals
Internet and social networks
Television
Newspapers / publications
National authorities
Civil society actors
Local authorities
Traditional healers
40%
46%
44%
39%
69%
20%
29%
28%
26%
28%
23%
9%
54%
58%
64%
53%
74%
21%
40%
38%
49%
49%
40%
9%
35%
42%
37%
35%
68%
20%
25%
24%
19%
20%
17%
9%
6 For internal use of those working on the Ebola response.
COMMUNICATION: Speculations about the reality of the epidemic and its fabrication
for financial or political gains are widespread, especially among women, the poor.
Most people have heard statements that the epidemic is not real (86%), or that it was fabricated for financial gains
(85%) or to destabilize the region (86%). Overall, one in four respondents believe that Ebola is not real (25%), and
one in three believe it was fabricated for financial reasons (33%) or to destabilize the region (36%). Women and
poorer respondents are more likely to believe these statements are true. Belief in these rumors appears to be
associated in mistrust in institutions and low adoption of Ebola‐related protective behaviors.
Believe statement is true
(% yes)
Heard statement before
(% yes)
25% believe statement to be true (Ebola is not real)
21% 27% 25% 32% 33% 33%43%
34% 36%
93%84% 86% 89% 83% 85% 89% 85% 86%
Beni
Butembo
Total
Beni
Butembo
Total
Beni
Butembo
Total
Ebola is not real Ebola is fabricated forfinancial gains
Ebola is fabricated todestabilize the region
31%20%
34% 27% 21% 20%
Women
Men
Poorest
quartile … …
Richest
quartile
Gender Wealth
Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 7
BEHAVIOR: The epidemic appears to have had, so far, a limited effect on social
interactions, but respondents indicated reduced physical interactions, and most
avoided any risk of exposure to people they suspected were infected or in contact
with infected people.
Following the announcement of the outbreak of Ebola in North Kivu, respondents have changed some behavior,
most frequently in direct response to the risk of exposure, for example by avoiding contact with people they
suspect visited Ebola affected areas (73%), people who are infected with Ebola (76%) or people they suspect died
of Ebola (79%). These avoidance behaviors are more frequent in Beni, compared to Butembo, which may be
explained by the higher number of cases in the city of Beni to date. Respondents also indicted reduced physical
interactions like physical contacts with people in general (54%). Few, however, indicated reduced social
interactions, including avoidance of public space. Information and knowledge about Ebola appear to be associated
with increased odds of behavior changes.
Ebola‐related behavior changes (% respondents)
Total Beni Butembo
73%
76%
79%
75%
1%
1%
2%
4%
8%
31%
54%
90%
Avoid contact with people you suspect have visited Ebola affected areas
Avoid contact with people you suspect are infected by Ebola
Avoid contact with the body of a person suspepected to have died of Ebola
Avoid contact with people who had contact with someone infected by Ebola
Avoid visiting extended family members
Avoid visiting neighbors
Stay home more than usual
Avoid going to the church
Avoid taking public transports
Reduce physical interactions with relatives
Reduce physical interactions with others
Washing hands more frequently
Direct exposure
Social interaction
Physical contact
87%
85%
93%
82%
1%
1%
2%
5%
10%
54%
77%
97%
69%
72%
74%
72%
1%
1%
2%
3%
7%
22%
46%
88%
8 For internal use of those working on the Ebola response.
MOBILITY: Travels are relatively limited, but higher wealth, education and
occupation as trader are associated with more frequent movements.
Movements in and out of neighborhood, across the city and across the province and beyond are relatively limited.
Overall, 4 out of 10 respondents (43%) indicated moving across neighboring quartiers more than 4 times a week,
on average. Another 21% moved across neighboring quartiers 2 to 4 times a week, and 14% moved across
neighboring quartiers once a week. The percentage of individuals frequently traveling outside of their quartier
decreased when considering longer movements. Overall 31% of respondents traveled across neighboring territoire
at least occasionally, and 13% travelled beyond neighboring territoire, but within the province. The percentages of
respondents who indicated travelling to other provinces or across the border at least occasionally was small (6%
and 1%, respectively). The frequencies of movement were similar among respondents from Beni and Butembo and
among men and women. However, higher mobility is associated with wealth, higher education level and occupation
as trader or civil servant as opposed to other activities. For example, 42% of the respondents in the wealthiest
quartile moved across neighboring territoire, compared to 23% among those in the poorest wealth quartile.1
Frequency of movement, by distance to the dwelling
Neighboring
quartiers
Within city,
beyond
neighboring
quartiers
Neighboring
territoire
Province, beyond
neighboring territoire
Other province Other country
1 The wealth of household was estimated by assessing their possession of ten nonproductive assets such as a table, a chair or a cellphone. A factor analysis was used to compute a global score of relative wealth. This score was then used to delineate quartiles corresponding to the poorest through the richest households.
43%
21%
14%
16%
6%
22%
16%
18%
24%
20%
1%2%7%
21%
68%
1%2%
10%
87%
1%5%
94%
2%
98%
More than 4 times a week
2 to 4 times a week
Once a week
Less than oncea week
Never
Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 9
BURIAL PRACTICES: Physical contact and exposure of the body of the deceased are
common. Many aspects of safe and dignified burials are unacceptable to
respondents.
This Ebola rapid survey included several questions around burial practices. Generally, respondents indicated that
burials occur within one or two days of deaths (95%) and that the body is buried by the family itself (96%). When
ask who, if anyone, they notify of the death, respondents indicated that relatives, friends and neighbors are
frequently immediately notified. Administrative and religious authorities, on the other hand are much less
frequently notified, and health professionals are almost never notified. Respondents frequently indicated that
bodies are generally transported to the place of origin of the deceased, even if it is far away (64%). They also
frequently noted that relatives have physical contact with the body (84%) and wash the body (73%). Almost all
respondents noted that the body is publicly exposed between the death and the burial (95%).
DEATH OCCURS → Notifications (% of respondents)
Burial timing
(% of respondents)
Who takes care of
the body?
(% of respondents)
Events during
burials
(% yes)
Transport body to place of origin, even if far away 64%
Family members / friends touch the body of the dead 84%
Family members / friends wash the body of the dead 73%
The body is exposed to the public in the open air before burial 95%
The body stays at home more than a day before burial 34%
96%
81%
68%
17%
17%
1%
Relatives
Neighbors
Friends
Religious leaders
Local administrative authorities
Health professionals / doctors
One day
74%
Two days
21%
More than 2 days
5%
84%
47% 36%9% 4% 2% 0%
Family Friends Neighbors Healthprofessionals
Religiousleader
Localauthorities
No response
10 For internal use of those working on the Ebola response.
Ebola infection can occur from touching the bodies of those who have died from Ebola virus disease. Safe and
dignified practices are promoted to reduce handling of dead bodies and ensure that burials are done by trained
teams. The results, however, suggest that many aspects of safe and dignified burials are not acceptable to a large
percentage of respondents. Overall, just 13% of the respondents would accept that medical staff dress the body
instead of the family, and only 9% would accept having the body stay at a medical facility before burial, rather than
home. Similar low percentages found it acceptable to not have the body visible during the ceremony (4%
acceptable), to not clean the body but use perfume instead (7%) or to have the medical personnel bury the body
rather than the family (2% acceptable). A higher percentage – but still just one in three person‐ found it acceptable
to proceed with the burial without waiting for those relatives traveling from far away. There was little to no
difference between respondents in Beni and Butembo.
Acceptance of burial practices
(% of respondents who find the proposition acceptable)
13%
Medical staff dress the
body instead of the family
5%
The body is not visible
during the ceremony
9%
The body stays at the
hospital / health center
4%
The body is not cleaned,
but a perfume is used.
2%
Medical personnel bury the
body rather than the family
35%
Do not wait for relatives
traveling from far away
Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 11
HEALTHCARE: Respondents will turn to hospitals to seek care if they suspect they
have Ebola, but health centers and pharmacies are frequently used. Overall
perception of health professionals is positive. Treatment options are not well known.
Respondents largely turn to health professionals for care. Health centers, hospitals and pharmacies are frequently
reported as the place people will go first if they feel sick for any reason (25%, 29%, and 38%, respectively). If they
suspected they had Ebola, respondents would more frequently turn to hospitals for care (75%) compared to other
health service providers. However, in Beni, more respondents noted they would first turn to health centers (47%)
compared to those in Butembo (4%). This likely reflects the overall more frequent reliance on health centers in Beni
compared to Butembo when sick. While many respondents turn to pharmacy when they feel sick (38%), few would
do so if they suspected they had Ebola (1%). Reliance on pharmacies when feeling sick was more frequent in
Butembo than Beni.
Where would you go first for care…
If you are sick (general) If you suspect you have Ebola Total (% of respondents) Total (% of respondents)
Beni Butembo Beni Butembo
Overall, 67% of respondents said they were aware about the existence of a treatment for Ebola. The percentages
were similar in Butembo and Beni. More men (72%) than women (62%) said they were aware of such treatment.
Most respondents who had heard about treatment for Ebola believed those treatments could be obtained at
hospitals (82%) or at health centers (31%). One in ten respondents (11%) did not know where such treatments
would be available. Percentages were similar in Beni and Butembo, except concerning the perceived availability of
treatment at health centers, which was much more frequent in Beni (61%) compared to Butembo (21%). This likely
reflects the much more common use of health centers to seek care in Beni compared to Butembo.
25%
29%
38%
5%
2%
Health Center
Hospital
Pharmacy
Nobody
Other
15%
75%
1%
2%
7%
Health Center
Hospital
Pharmacy
Nobody
Other
59%
24%
17%
0%
1%
Health Center
Hospital
Pharmacy
Nobody
Other
14%
31%
46%
7%
3%
47%
47%
0%
0%
5%
Health Center
Hospital
Pharmacy
Nobody
Other
4%
84%
2%
2%
8%
12 For internal use of those working on the Ebola response.
Awareness and source of treatment for Ebola (% respondents)
Where to get treatment
Overall, respondents are positive about health professionals and their contribution to the Ebola response. Three in
four believe they can protect the population form Ebola (73%), and a higher percentage believe they are preventing
the spread of the virus (83%), compared to a minority who believe they are spreading the virus (7%). Nevertheless,
just 62% trusted health professionals to act in the best interest of the population in their response to Ebola;
another 30% were neutral, and 8% did not trust them to do so.
Perception of health
professionals
Health professionals can protect us from Ebola (% agree) 73%
Health professionals are spreading the virus (% agree) 7%
Health professionals are preventing the spread of the virus (% agree) 83%
Trust health professionals to act in the best interest of the population in
their response to the epidemic
62%
67% aware of treatment for Ebola
31%
82%
13% 11%
Healthcenter
Hospital Other Don't know
DRAFT ‐ Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 13
VACCINATION: Vaccines are generally trusted but fewer trust Ebola vaccines.
Perception of risk and lack of clarity in access undermine trust.
Most respondents have heard about vaccines (100%) and believe that they generally work (91%) and are safe
(88%). Most have heard of an Ebola vaccine (88%), more than the percentage of respondents who heard about the
existence of treatment (67%). Only 66% of all respondents believe an Ebola vaccine works and about the same
percentage (63%) would get the vaccine if it was available to them. The main rationale for not taking the vaccine is
the perception that it is dangerous (71%) or does not work (23%), Among other responses (19%) respondents
discussed the lack of clarity about who gets the vaccines, and how and where to get it.
Heard about vaccines in general
(% yes)
Believe vaccines work
(% yes)
Believe vaccines are safe
(% yes)
Heard about Ebola vaccine
(% yes)
Believe Ebola vaccine works
(% yes)
Would take the vaccine if
available? (% yes)
If no, why not?
100% 91% 88%
88% 66% 63%
71%
23%
11%
19%
It is dangerous
It does not work
Not needed
Other reasons
14 DRAFT ‐ For internal use of those working on the Ebola response.
TRUST IN THE EBOLA RESPONSE: Trust in institutions is low. While perceptions about
the Ebola response are more positive, few see key actors as contributing to the
response, which may further undermine trust and cohesion.
For several years, insecurity and lack of services in the region have undermined people’s trust in the government. In
general, only a minority of respondents believe that government authorities at all levels represent their interest
‘well or very well’.
How well do authorities represent the interest of the population (% well – very well)
A higher percentage of respondents trust the government to act in the best interest of the population in their
response to the Ebola epidemic (41%). Nevertheless, this accounts for less than half the respondents and is lower
that the percentage of respondents who trust health professionals to act in the best interest of the population.
Furthermore, while few respondents agreed with negative statements about the government response, a large
percentage were neutral, suggesting at best some doubts about how much the government cares, is able to protect
the population, and acts in their best interests.
Agree Neutral Disagree
Perception of
government response
The government can protect us from Ebola (% agree) 39% 37% 24%
The national government does not care that people get sick of
Ebola 14% 44% 42%
Provincial government does not care about people getting sick
from Ebola 13% 44% 43%
Local authorities (chefs de quartier) do not care about people
getting sick from Ebola 8% 51% 41%
Trust the government to act in the best interest of the
population in their response to the epidemic 41% 37% 24%
Respondents, however, somewhat recognize the contribution to the Ebola response of actors like health
professionals (41% large contribution), the Red Cross (37% large contribution), or the national government (25%
large contribution). However, for all actors considered in this survey, many respondents had no opinion about their
contribution to the response to the epidemic, reflecting the lack of information about the overall response. That is
especially the case in Butembo. Furthermore, at the individual level, few expect direct support from these actors if
they were sick (Ebola or other disease).
Beni, 45%
Beni, 32%
Ben
i, 14%
Beni, 5%
Butembo, 27%
Butembo, 9%
Butembo, 2%
Butembo, 1%Total, 3
2%
Total, 15%
Total, 5%
Total, 2%
Local authorities (chefs dequartier)
City government (mayor) Provincial government National government
DRAFT ‐ Ebola Rapid Survey | October 2018 15
Contribution in the Ebola response
(% respondents)
None
15%
16%
17%
4%
33%
7%
15%
17%
15%
8%
15%
21%
Average
32%
33%
31%
58%
14%
36%
52%
21%
19%
32%
16%
12%
Large
25%
21%
14%
14%
5%
41%
9%
15%
23%
37%
23%
9%
No response
28%
30%
38%
24%
48%
16%
24%
47%
43%
23%
46%
58%
National government
Provincial government
City government
Religious leaders
Traditional leaders
Health professionals
The community itself
National NGOs
International NGOs
The Red Cross
UN agencies
MONUSCO
With support from:
INNOVATION FUND