Survey and Workflow for Horizontal Completion Procedures

download Survey and Workflow for Horizontal Completion Procedures

of 23

description

SS

Transcript of Survey and Workflow for Horizontal Completion Procedures

  • Survey and Workflow for HorizontalCompletion Procedures

    Randy AndressPrincipal Engineering Consultant

  • Completion Methods

    Open Hole Cased Hole

  • Open Hole Completions

    Bare Foot Slotted Liner Mechanically Staged

    Process Packers Plus DirectStim Delta Stim Sleave Zone Select Frac-Point

  • Bare Foot Completions

    Advantages Lowest Cost

    Simple

    Non-exact Geology/Geophysics

    No cementing Zonal Isolation Issues

    Limitations Poor Isolation or Staging Options

    Borehole Integrity

    Open Hole No Tubulars

  • Slotted Liner

    Advantages

    Low Cost

    Simple

    Non-exact Geology/Geophysics

    No cementing Zonal Isolation Issues

    Maintains Borehole Integrity

    Limitations

    Poor Isolation or Staging Options

    Open Hole Slotted Tubulars

  • Mechanically Staged Process

    Advantages

    Excellent Stage or Zonal Isolation

    Simplified Pumping Operations

    Significantly Reduces Completion Time

    Extensive Track Record and Multiple Suppliers

    No cementing Issues

    System of Isolation Packers and Ball Actuated Ports or Sleeves

  • Mechanically Staged Process

  • Mechanically Staged Process

    Limitations

    Significantly More Expensive

    System Subject to Damage While RIH

    Tubular ID Restricts Injection Rates

    More Precise Geology/Geophysics Required

    Utilize Coiled Tubing to Mill Out Ball Seats

    Limited Ability to Perform Fracture Diagnostics

    System of Isolation Packers and Ball Actuated Ports or Sleeves

  • Cased Hole Completions

    Pump Down Plug and Perf Annular Coiled Tubing Fracturing External Casing Perforating Process

  • Advantages

    Excellent Stage Isolation

    Simplified Pumping Operations

    Significantly Reduces Completion Time

    Extensive Track Record and Multiple Suppliers

    Ability to Perform Individual Stage Fracture Diagnostics

    Composite Bridge Plug is Mounted to Wireline Perforating Guns and RIH to Setting Depth. The Plug is Charge Set then Gun is Pulled to

    the Next Perforating Depth.

    Pump Down Plug and Perf

  • Limitations

    Plugs Require Coiled Tubing Mill-Out

    Plug May Bridge or Prematurely Set While RIH

    More Precise Geology/Geophysics Required

    Integrity of Cemented Casing

    Composite Bridge Plug is Mounted to Wireline Perforating Guns and RIH to Setting Depth. The Plug is Charge Set then Gun is Pulled to

    the Next Perforating Depth.

    Pump Down Plug and Perf

  • Advantages

    Excellent Stage Isolation

    Multiple Stages Treated Per Day

    Reduces Completion Time

    Ability to Reverse Out

    Ability to Perform Individual Stage Fracture Diagnostics

    Utilizes Coiled Tubing and a Jetting-Packer Assembly to Isolate From Previous Stages and Convey a Jetting Slurry to the Depth of Interest.

    Fracture Treatments are Then Pumped Down the Annulus.

    Annular Coiled Tubing Fracturing

  • Limitations

    Coiled Tubing May Stack-Out Short of TD

    Rate Restrictions Due to Annular Size

    Depth/CT Size Limitations

    Potential Tool Sticking Due to Low Side Proppant Build-up

    More Precise Geology/Geophysics Required

    Integrity of Cemented Casing

    Coiled Tubing adds Significant Costs

    Annular Coiled Tubing Fracturing

  • Advantages

    Excellent Stage Isolation

    Multiple Stages Treated Per Day

    Significantly Reduces Completion Time

    Hydraulic Line Can be Used as Dead String

    External Perforating Guns and Integral Isolation Valves are Attached to the Casing and RIH Prior to Cementing Casing. The Guns are Individually Fired Using an Attached Hydraulic Line and Pre-set

    Hydraulic Pressures.

    External Casing Perforating Process

  • Limitations

    Coiled Tubing Mill-Out of Isolation Valves

    Rate Restrictions Due to Tubular Size

    System Subject to Damage While RIH

    Very Precise Geology/Geophysics Required

    Integrity of Cemented Casing

    More Expensive Than Other Methods

    External Casing Perforating Process

  • So, Whats Best?

    Depends

  • Open Hole vs. Cemented Casing Stress Direction Formation Height, Fluid Contacts, Frac

    Barriers

    Permeability Reservoir Petrophysical Knowledge Offset or Field Data

  • Open Hole vs. Cemented Casing

    Undulating Directional Profile Could Impact Sweep Efficiency During the Cementing Process and Compromise Zonal Isolation

    Loss Zones Could Steal Cement Slurry and Compromise Zonal Isolation

    Extended Reach Horizonal Boreholes Could Present ECD Issues Which Impact Full Circulation

    Waiting on Future Reservoir or Petrophysical Data May Dictate Casing and Cementing Open Hole

  • Stress Direction

    Stress direction is the key determinate of hydraulic fracture orientation in horizontal wells

    Wells drilled in the direction of maximum horizontal stress will yield longitudinal fractures (Parallel to the wellbore). While this might be desirable in moderate permeability reservoirs, it is not ideal for micro-perm formations.

    Conversely, wells drilled perpendicular to the maximum horizontal stress will facilitate transverse fractures. Multiple transverse fractures will contact a much larger volume of reservoir rock.

  • Formation Height, Fluid Contacts, Frac Barriers

    Reservoirs containing gas-oil or gas-water contacts are better suited for multiple small longitudinal fractures to control fracture growth thru the fluid contacts.

    Reservoirs with thin pay sections or with solid fracture barriers are more economically completed and stimulated with longitudinal fractures.

  • Permeability

    Reservoirs with micro-permeability will require multiple transverse fractures to contact as much rock as possible.

    Reservoirs with moderate permeability will not require the massive stimulation. Two to four properly spaced longitudinal fractures will be adequate to cover the horizontal section. This will also apply to reservoirs with moderate to good vertical permeability.

  • Reservoir Petrophysical Knowledge

    If the level of reservoir and petrophysical knowledge is high, the mechanically staged process will be the most effective method to maximize reservoir coverage and minimize drilling and completion time. However, if the level is low, this could be the most costly and inefficient choice.

    If the level of reservoir and petrophysical knowledge is low, (or waiting on data), cementing casing and then utilizing the Pump Down Plug and Perf method will be more effective. This method will allow individual stimulation and testing prior to moving to the next interval.

  • Offset or Field Wide Data

    Run casing and cement if waiting for: Offset well to be drilled Additional reservoir or petrophysical data Micro-seismic operations