Supreme Court Minutes: Wednesday, July 10, 2019
Transcript of Supreme Court Minutes: Wednesday, July 10, 2019
955
SUPREME COURT MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 2019
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
S127621 PEOPLE v. ERSKINE (SCOTT
THOMAS)
Rehearing denied
The petition for review is denied.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255371 B290589 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 PEOPLE v. MAYA (MISAEL
VENCES)
Petition for review granted
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S245203 D072171 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 FACEBOOK, INC. v. S.C.
(TOUCHSTONE)
Supplemental briefing ordered
Pursuant to Evidence Code sections 459, subdivision (c), and 455, subdivision (a), this court
contemplates taking judicial notice of the underlying preliminary hearing transcript of
September 29, 2016, and related exhibits. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.46(f)(3),
this court contemplates unsealing the April 21, 2017, declaration and related exhibits (quoting
from and presenting copies of public social media posts and conditionally confidential probation
reports) on the ground that access by petitioner Facebook, Inc., and intervenor San Diego County
District Attorney is necessary to fairly address and resolve whether the underlying subpoena’s
request for private and restricted social media communications is supported by good cause.
With regard to both items described above, each party shall serve and file a brief by July 24, 2019,
addressing the prospect of this court taking such judicial notice, the prospect of such unsealing,
and the scope of any such unsealing. Any party may serve and file a response brief within 14
days of the timely filing of the above-described briefs.
After this court receives and considers the briefing contemplated above, it may direct the parties
to brief whether the underlying subpoena is supported by good cause, and if not, what if any
further proceedings concerning the adequacy of the subpoena should occur before the trial court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 956
S255431 B279396 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. CLARK
(MARKESE DEWON)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of related issues in People v. Perez, S248730 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255592 B286803/B287202 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. MOUNTFORD
(DAVID GORDON)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of related issues in People v. Jimenez, S249397 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255605 D073554 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. DAVIS (ERIC
LEWIS)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in People v. Aledamat, S248105 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255610 B289192 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 ZAKARYAN (ARTHUR) v.
THE MEN’S WEARHOUSE,
INC.
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The applications to appear pro hac vice are granted.
The petition for review granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in Z.B., N.A. v. Superior Court (Lawson), S246711 (see Cal.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 957
Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional
briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the
court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255628 B287487 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 IN RE J.G.
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of related issues in In re Ricardo P., S230923, and People v. Trujillo, S244650
(see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of
additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further
order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255686 B290706 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS
(ADRIAN DEMETRIUS)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in People v. Frahs, S252220 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255764 A156913 First Appellate District, Div. 4 CHAMBERS (JOHN) v. S.C.
(REDWOOD CITY)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of Stancil v. S.C. (Redwood City), S253783 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 958
S255781 A156914 First Appellate District, Div. 4 FLEMING (WILLIAM
MICHAEL) v. S.C.
(REDWOOD CITY)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of Stancil v. S.C. (Redwood City), S253783 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255889 E069417 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. DUDZINSKY
(MICHAEL WALTER)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in People v. Aledamat, S248105 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255969 A151633/A152252/A153624
First Appellate District, Div. 4 BURCH (MICHAEL B.) v.
CERTAINTEED
CORPORATION
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted only as to the following issue: Does Civil Code section 1431.2,
which limits a defendant’s liability for noneconomic damages “in direct proportion to that
defendant’s percentage of fault,” eliminate an intentional tortfeasor’s joint and several liability for
noneconomic damages?
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in
B.B. v. County of Los Angeles, S250734 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending
further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of
Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 959
S256066 C079671 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. MERCADO
(EMANUEL MONTALVO)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of related issues in People v. Orozco, S249495 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S256081 B284886 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 PEOPLE v. KNIGHT, JR.,
(LEON)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of a related issue in People v. Frahs, S252220 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to
California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S256136 A148863 First Appellate District, Div. 3 STROUSE (JAMES) v.
WEBCOR CONSTRUCTION,
L.P. (ACCO ENGINEERED
SYSTEMS)
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred
The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration
and disposition of related issues in Sandoval v. Qualcomm, Inc., S252796 and Gonzalez v. Mathis,
S247677 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court.
Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred
pending further order of the court.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S243964 PUCKETT (JEREMY
PHILLIP) ON H.C.
Order to show cause issued, returnable in Superior Court
The Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is ordered to show
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 960
cause before the Sacramento County Superior Court, when the matter is placed on calendar, why
relief should not be granted on the grounds that the prosecution withheld material exculpatory
evidence from the defense (see Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83), that trial counsel’s failure
to introduce exculpatory statements by prosecution witness Israel Sept violated petitioner’s right
to the effective assistance of counsel, and that petitioner has come forward with new evidence that
he is innocent of the charges (see Pen. Code, § 1473, subd. (b)(3)(A)). The return must be served
and filed on or before August 9, 2019.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255381 THOMAS (DENISE) v.
THOMAS (GARY EVERETT)
Petition for review granted; transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division P
The petition for review is granted. The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second
Appellate District, Division P, for further proceedings in light of its letter to this court dated
June 20, 2019.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255566 D075671 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 BRACAMONTES (MANUEL)
v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for review granted; transferred to Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division
One, with directions to issue an order to show cause
The petition for review is granted and the matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth
Appellate District, Division One, with instructions to vacate its order denying the petition for writ
of mandate and to issue an order to show cause before that court when the matter is placed on
calendar why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted on the ground that private
individuals and entities working on criminal cases at the behest and under the direction of law
enforcement are subject to the discovery provisions of Penal Code section 1054.9 and the
preservation obligations described in People v. Superior Court (Morales) (2017) 2 Cal.5th 523.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S256165 C088611 Third Appellate District CABRERA (MIGUEL) ON
H.C.
Petition for review granted; transferred to Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, with
directions to issue an order to show cause
The petition for review is granted. The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 961
Appellate District. That court is ordered to vacate its summary denial dated May 30, 2019, and is
further ordered to issue an order to show cause, returnable before the Siskiyou County Superior
Court. The Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is to be ordered to
show cause, when the matter is placed on calendar, why petitioner is not entitled to dismissal of
the great bodily injury finding and the resulting five-year serious felony enhancement (see Pen.
Code, § 667, subd. (a)(1)), based on his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. (See
Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466; Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296;
Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270.)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Groban, JJ.
S255268 A152048 First Appellate District, Div. 1 WALKER (ANNE) v. MARIN
MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255297 C080396 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. SAETERN
(NATHAN)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255310 B282446 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. DURAN (JOSEPH
ALFONSO)
Petition for review denied
The request for judicial notice is granted.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255409 B282869 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. MATHIS
(GERALD PATRICK)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255446 H042694 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. CAHILL
(MICHAEL JOSEPH)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 962
S255448 B291549 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 CLARK (MARKESE DEWON)
ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255457 C077560 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. LAKE (JACOB
SCOTT)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255458 A152350 First Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. FAIRBANKS
(BYRON McCORD)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255461 H044430 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. BUI (THAM)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255465 F078739 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
(DANNY MUNDALL)
Petition for review denied
Petitioner’s request for judicial notice, filed on April 29, 2019, is denied.
Petitioner’s requests for judicial notice, filed on June 7, 2019, June 13, 2019, and June 20, 2019,
are granted.
The Attorney General’s request for judicial notice, filed on May 30, 2019, is granted.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255491 B284515 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. ORNELAS
(ERNESTO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255503 F078873 Fifth Appellate District HAMILTON (PAUL C.) v. S.C.
(CABRAL)
The petition for review is denied without prejudice to a renewed challenge after the Fresno
County Superior Court disposes of the issue whether conducting the trial telephonically will
provide Hamilton with meaningful access to the courts.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 963
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255515 B290057 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 PEOPLE v. CHAMAGUA
(RALPH R.)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255519 MURRELL, JR., (ANTONY T.)
v. S.C.
Petition for writ of certiorari denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255532 F074704 Fifth Appellate District NIETO (DANIEL) v. FRESNO
BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.
Petition for review & depublication request(s) denied
Petitioner’s request for judicial notice is granted.
Petitioner’s unopposed request, filed June 4, 2019, to withdraw the petition for review is granted.
The requests for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal are
denied.
The court declines to review this matter on its own motion. The matter is now final.
S255545 D073467 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. PEDERSEN
(VINCENT FRANK)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255548 G055674 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. CARRUTHERS
(JAMES B.)
Petition for review denied
The request for judicial notice is granted.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255552 B286186 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 PEOPLE v. SARWARY
(HAMIDULLAH)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 964
S255573 B284691 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 PEOPLE v. WILSON (ROSIE
LEE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255596 G054707 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. ROGERS
(RONALD ARTHUR)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255603 A142818 First Appellate District, Div. 4 LONG (DANIEL) v. FORTY
NINERS FOOTBALL
COMPANY, LLC
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255612 B280163 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. LINARES (JIMMY
S.)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255617 A154389 First Appellate District, Div. 5 IN RE J.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255627 H045622 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. SPRADLIN
(JEFFREY)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255633 A151544 First Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. CAPANIS
(MATTHEW JOHN)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255642 B284286 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. JONES
(TERRELL)
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 965
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255644 E066230 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 ALKAYALI (AHMAD) v.
BOUKHARI (FATMA)
Petition for review & publication request(s) denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255649 A152525 First Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. MORALES
(ADRIAN ANTONIO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255650 H044953 Sixth Appellate District JACKPOT HARVESTING,
INC. v. APPLIED
UNDERWRITERS, INC.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255657 B276258 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. RAOUF (JOSEPH
PIERRE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255663 G057559 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. S.C. (S.G.)
The petition for review is denied. The stay previously issued by this court is dissolved.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255664 B290757 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. POTTS
(TIMOTHY)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255678 B287979 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 PEOPLE v. BORNEY
(MARQUES M.)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 966
S255693 G057609 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 ARAMBULA (ALLEN) v. S.C.
(IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255697 B285102 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 PEOPLE v. LAWRENCE
(HERBERT)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255728 B285307 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. REED (VINIQUIA)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255733 D074716 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. REDD, JR.,
(KELVIN LEYMON)
Petitions for review denied
Liu, J., is of the opinion the petition should be granted.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255734 F075910 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. ANDRADE
(LEONARDO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255735 B285683 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. CORONADO
(MICHAEL A.)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255740 A153351 First Appellate District, Div. 5 VELARDE (JOAN) v. TRICOR
AMERICA, INC.
Petition for review & publication request(s) denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 967
S255745 H046376 Sixth Appellate District O. (A.) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255748 C089305 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. ROGERS
(D’ANGELO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255762 D072569 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 BENNETT (PAMELA) v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;
DEUTSCHE BANK
NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY
Petition for review & publication request(s) denied
Chin, J., was recused and did not participate.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255768 B284623 Second Appellate District, Div. 2 HEDER (TYSON) v. CITY OF
LOS ANGELES
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255785 A156872 First Appellate District, Div. 5 HIPOLITO (MIGUEL) v.
APPELLATE DIVISION
(PEOPLE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255794 C083665 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. REIMER
(MICHAEL LAWSON)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255800 D074896 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. VANDERWOOD
(MICHAEL LAMAR)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 968
S255806 H044623 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. HERBST (CORY)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255808 G056414 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 UPTOWN NEWPORT
JAMBOREE, LLC v.
NEWPORT FAB, LLC
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255811 C087461 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. PARRISH
(JOSHUA THOMAS)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255853 B296804 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 PENA (MIGUEL) v.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD; AQUA SYSTEMS
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255857 B293326 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. KING
(ANTHONY)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255863 B295402 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
POLICE DEPARTMENT v.
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION APPEALS
BOARD & WALLOCH
(GREG)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255867 B277387 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. JACKSON
(MARQUISE)
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 969
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255870 D073491 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 DUDEK (DAVID) v. DUDEK
(ANNE KEBISEK)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255878 G054958 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. OCAMPO
(BRYAN)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255894 D072674 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 JOHNSON III (ROBERT T.) v.
OCEAN 6 RS, LLC
Petition for review & publication request(s) denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255900 A147103/A147379 First Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. EDWARDS
(ANTONIO)
Petition for review & depublication request(s) denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255912 B286628 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 HAN REALTY
CORPORATION v. BANK OF
AMERICA
Petition for review denied
Chin, J., was recused and did not participate.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255916 A149546 First Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
(SONNY JOSEPH)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255924 B279575 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 MERUELO (BELINDA) v.
EAST WEST BANK
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 970
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255934 B287728 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 WEBRE (KEVIN) v. OCWEN
LOAN SERVICING, INC.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255940 G054989 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 STENNETT (JACQUELINE) v.
MILLER (DANAE MARIE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255964 D074666 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
(GEORGE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255975 B283984 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 AARONSON (ARTHUR) v.
HESHMATI (NADIA)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255980 E069940 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. GONZALEZ
(TROY ANGELO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255982 F073236 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. ENRIQUEZ
(EMILIANO ISIDRO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255987 D073336 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. DIXON, JR.,
(BENNIE WILLIE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 971
S255990 B286984 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. SHELLEY
(LEROY JOSEPH)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255991 C089256 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. WELLS
(EMMANUEL)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255993 G057123 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 LAUN (MARK) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255995 H046915 Sixth Appellate District COLLIER (JOE ROBERT) ON
H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255997 B288253 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. HUFF (AKIRIA
CLARICE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255998 E068742 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. IBARRA
(EMANUEL LOPEZ)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256006 B297474 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 COLE (ANGELA
ROCHELLE) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256007 C086762 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. REDMOND
(CESARE)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 972
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256009 E070102 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. BRADLEY
(MARLON RENE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256010 C084267 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. SMITH (TYRONE
RAYMOND)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256011 B288687 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 YOUSSEF (ASHRAF) v.
SIDHOM (OSAMA)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256013 B287928 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. DREW (DONTE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256020 H045672 Sixth Appellate District IN RE R.I.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256024 B291008 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 BRENNER (BARRY) v.
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL
HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Petition for review denied
The application of petitioner to file the unredacted petition for review under seal is granted. (Cal.
Rules of Court, rules 2.550(d); 8.46(b).) In ordering the sealing, this court makes the findings
required by California Rules of Court, rules 2.550(d) and 8.46(d)(6). The clerk of this court is
directed to file the unredacted petition for review under seal.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256026 B290094 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. GARAY (JOSE E.)
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 973
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256028 B290826 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. STOLDEN
(ROOSEVELT)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256034 E069548 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. CORDOVA
(JOSHUA ANDREW)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256037 B297265 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 ALLEN (KEVIN ) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256040 F077679 Fifth Appellate District LUNA (OSCAR) v. DE SANTIS
(PIETRO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256045 A148396/A148501/A150463/A151849
First Appellate District, Div. 1 STEWART (PATRICIA),
ESTATE OF
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256049 E070715 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. CHAVEZ
(ALBERTO RAY)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256050 C081113 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. TAYLOR
(JOVANTE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 974
S256051 E068933 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. WINSTON
(MYOHO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256052 HIRAMANEK (RODA) v.
COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD
APPELLATE DISTRICT
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition & application for stay denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256062 B291449 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 PEOPLE v. CHOUEST, JR.,
(WILSON CLAUDE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256063 A156813 First Appellate District, Div. 4 BARRETT (JOHN THOMAS)
ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., was recused and did not participate.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256083 B281901 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON
(VINCENT)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256084 A153306 First Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. WINN (RONNIE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256086 B297496 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 RODRIGUEZ (RUBEN
DANIEL) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 975
S256089 SANTANA (ANDRES) v. S.C.
(PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256090 C085116 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. WARREN
(KATRINA ADRIANE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256094 H045891 Sixth Appellate District IN RE DAVID C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256103 C083896 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. SILVA (AARON
ROJAS)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256107 A154348 First Appellate District, Div. 3 CRAWLEY (MARCUS) v.
CITY OF OAKLAND
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256112 HSU (JOHN) v. CITY OF
BERKELEY
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256116 B289571 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. SANDOVAL
(CARLOS)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256118 B294618 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 SANDOVAL (CARLOS) ON
H.C.
Petition for review denied
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 976
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256119 ESCALANTE (REFUGIO) v.
SUPREME COURT OF
CALIFORNIA (COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256121 C079838 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. HELLMAN
(JOSHUA LEE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256124 H045775 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. PEREZ (ARTURO
MAYA)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256126 G055662 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 JAKUBAITIS (FRANK) v. BUI
(DUYEN THI)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256128 A149708 First Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. VELEZ, JR.,
(CONRAD)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256129 A157217 First Appellate District, Div. 5 MOORE (GARY B.) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256132 A157160 First Appellate District, Div. 5 MOORE (GARY B.) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 977
S256140 F074797 Fifth Appellate District PEOPLE v. PONCE (TONY
EUGENE)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256141 A157224 First Appellate District, Div. 4 DREVALEVA (TATYANA E.)
v. S.C. (ALAMEDA HEALTH
SYSTEM)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256142 D074239 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. SANCHEZ
(SALVADOR)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256143 A152675 First Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ-
FLORES (JUAN MANUEL)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256148 B284779 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. BROWN (JOHN J.)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256150 PHILLIPS (RICHARD LOUIS
ARNOLD) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
The petition for error coram vobis and application for stay are denied.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256155 H044440 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. SHAKOURY (ALI
REZA)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256161 B280027 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. SPREWELL
(RULIE CHEVEZ)
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 978
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256162 EDWARDS (JAMES
ARTHUR) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of error coram vobis denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256167 B286262 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 FORTE (DIANE) v. THE
VILLAGE GREEN OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256169 G054945 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. HERRERA, JR.,
(SALVADOR LEROY)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256174 D074099 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. HAMMOND
(RICHARD GIDEON)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256192 B278015 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ
(JANET)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256203 B293370 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 TURNER (EDDIE) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256210 E069166 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 2 PEOPLE v. MATEEN, JR.,
(DANIEL LEON)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 979
S256212 B289564 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 PEOPLE v. SEPULVEDA
(ISMAEL ALEJANDRO)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256214 B279617 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 PEOPLE v. BABAKITIS
(JAMES THOMAS)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256217 B291481 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 LOS PADRES
FORESTWATCH v. COUNTY
OF VENTURA (CARBON
CALIFORNIA COMPANY,
LLC)
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256238 B286000 Second Appellate District, Div. 3 BABAKITIS (JAMES
THOMAS) ON H.C.
Petition for review denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256276 WILLIAMS (KENNETH) v.
COURT OF APPEAL,
SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT (PEOPLE)
Petition for writ of mandate/prohibition denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256717 H040821 Sixth Appellate District PEOPLE v. CABRERA
(EDIBERTO)
Petitions for review & application for stay denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S251252 THOMAS (STEVEN) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 980
S251859 AYALA (VICTOR RICARDO)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to filing a motion in the trial
court pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.01. (See In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439.)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S252094 HARDIN (REGINALD) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S252109 VUKAJ (VASIL) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to filing a motion in the trial
court pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.01. (See In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439.)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S252115 MURPHY (JOHN PAUL
JONES) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S252295 RIGGINS (RODNEY LEE) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S252957 WHITE (DAVID LEDREW)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253279 ALVAREZ (SALVADOR) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to the filing of a petition for
resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 981
S253290 ZUEGEL (JAMES R.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253461 SIMS (THOMAS) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253463 ALEXANDRE (ANTHONY)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253621 COOPER (DERRICK) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253809 FLORES (JORGE CRUZ
ADAN) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253811 ROBERTSON (ROGER
WAYNE) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; In re Swain
(1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with
particularity].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d
734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253812 ROBERTSON (ROGER
WAYNE) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 982
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; In re Swain
(1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with
particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253857 SASSOUNIAN (HARRY M.)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253891 TRUSS (CRAIG E.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253955 HAYGOOD (HASSAUN
CECIL) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253962 UNDERDAHL (GEOFFREY
ANTHONY) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474
[a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary
evidence]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege
sufficient facts with particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253986 PAYNE (GERALD J.) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d
734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)
Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., was recused and did not participate.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S253991 SHERMAN (WILLIE
CLARENCE) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 983
S253997 CHEGAIYAMA (GEORGE
EMMANUEL) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474
[a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary
evidence]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege
sufficient facts with particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254000 ECHEVESTE (MISAEL) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254170 HER (KINSON) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254177 GARCIA (LUIS) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254208 DAWSON (KENNETH DEAN)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254236 CALLENDER (VINCENT A.)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254269 WATSON, JR., (ROBBIE
GENE) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 984
S254368 ESCAMILLA (ERNESTO L.)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that were rejected on appeal].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254421 MOTTON (EDWARD JAMES)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; People v. Duvall (1995) 9
Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available
documentary evidence].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See In re Miller (1941) 17
Cal.2d 734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254435 DAWSON (KENNETH DEAN)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254441 UNDERDAHL (GEOFFREY
ANTHONY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254452 DEAY (STEVEN ALLEN) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254453 WALLACE (ERIC) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254557 PAPAZYAN (VREZH NICK)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 985
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254676 MOTTON (EDWARD JAMES)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; People v. Duvall (1995) 9
Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available
documentary evidence].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See In re Miller (1941) 17
Cal.2d 734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254678 CHAVIRA (ROBERT) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254719 WATSON (TYRELL LEVINE)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254882 DAVIS (J.D. MICHAEL) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254902 FEE (JAVON) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254909 TURNER (LAFONZO R.) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254911 WALLACE (ERIC) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 986
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254912 TORRES (ANTHONY) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254975 KNIGHT (CLARENCE
VINSON) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254976 HERRERA (JOSHUA) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254982 ALEXANDER (DARRYL
KEITH) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; In re Lessard
(1965) 62 Cal.2d 497, 503 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that raise Fourth
Amendment violations]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas
corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d
300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254999 FLORES (JESSIE JAMES) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255004 SWON (JAMES) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 987
S255010 GARCIA (JOHNNY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255012 McCARDELL (DONALD
RAY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255017 HERNANDEZ (JIMMY) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255041 GHOLAR, SR., (JOHN R.) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255059 STRINGER, JR.,
(LAWRENCE T.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255072 WHITLEY (DELMOS) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255098 ORTIZ (VINCENT) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 988
S255115 PHILLIPS (CHRISTY C.) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255133 HERNANDEZ (FERNANDO)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255137 HUDSON (JORDAN
CORDELL) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255140 ELLIOTT (TRAVIS) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; People v. Duvall
(1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably
available documentary evidence]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain
habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255159 WARD (EUGENE HAROLD)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255162 McKINSTRY (SCOTT P.) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255163 HURTADO (RICHARD
ANTHONY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 989
S255172 CASARES (RAYMOND
LEONARD) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255173 MEDINA (JONATHAN E.) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to filing a motion in the trial
court pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.01. (See In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439.)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255175 CHU (RICHARD H.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255176 AZEVEDO (ALEX
LEONARD) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255177 FLAUNDERS (JOSEPH) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255180 HARRIS (EARNEST S.) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255181 CIOTTA (STEVEN) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 990
S255183 XIONG (JOHN) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255198 CAZARES (RENE) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255227 DAVIS (JERMOND
CHRISTOPHER) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255241 VALLERY (RAYNARD) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255244 STANLEY (RICHARD J.) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255246 NORMAN (DANIEL) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255247 VALLE (JONATHAN F.) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See
In re Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that were
rejected on appeal]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas
corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 991
S255251 MILES (JEFFERY) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255256 MOUNTFORD (DAVID
GORDON) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; People v. Villa (2009) 45
Cal.4th 1063, 1066 [habeas corpus relief is unavailable where the petitioner is not in the custody
of California authorities as a result of the challenged conviction].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255260 AZEVEDO (ALEX
LEONARD) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; People v. Duvall (1995) 9
Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available
documentary evidence]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas
corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255263 CORMIER (TIMOTHY
LAMAR) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255275 PINKERTON (SCOT) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255277 LEE (JESSIE CAVIN) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255281 WESTBROOK (PHILLIP) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 992
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255313 HOANG (HUNG LINH) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; People v. Duvall (1995) 9
Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available
documentary evidence].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255418 JOHNSON (HERBERT) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255419 SANCHEZ, JR., (GUSTAVO)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d
756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised
on appeal].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255423 CHURICH (ROBERT) ON
H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d
756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised
on appeal].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th
464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available
documentary evidence]; In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723 [courts will not entertain habeas
corpus claims that attack the sufficiency of the evidence].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255424 GARZA (RAUL) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; People v. Duvall
(1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 993
available documentary evidence]; In re Dexter (1979) 25 Cal.3d 921, 925-926 [a habeas corpus
petitioner must exhaust available administrative remedies].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255445 DAVIS (JERMOND
CHRISTOPHER) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on
appeal]; In re Lessard (1965) 62 Cal.2d 497, 503 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims
that raise Fourth Amendment violations].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255449 MALDONADO (JUAN) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255451 HODGE (MARK A.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255455 QASSEM (BRANDON
ASAAD) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255489 MOUNTFORD (DAVID
GORDON) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; People v. Villa (2009) 45
Cal.4th 1063, 1066 [habeas corpus relief is unavailable where the petitioner is not in the custody
of California authorities as a result of the challenged conviction].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255518 DAVIS (JERMOND
CHRISTOPHER) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 994
S255537 HERRERA (JOSHUA) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255681 MURRELL, JR., (ANTONY T.)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255717 STRINGER, JR.,
(LAWRENCE T.) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255818 RIGGINS (RODNEY LEE) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256033 WALKER (CHRISTOPHER)
ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474
[a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary
evidence]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege
sufficient facts with particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256042 RIVERA (TIMOTHY DEAN)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256123 GAMEZ (LYNDONNA) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 995
S256134 GANDARA (THOMAS
ARTHUR) ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256222 ESCALANTE (REFUGIO) ON
H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256225 MATEEN, JR., (DANIEL L.)
ON H.C.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256248 AZEVEDO (ALEX
LEONARD) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780
[courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th
750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256391 INCHAUSTEQUII
(EDUARDO) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474
[a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary
evidence]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege
sufficient facts with particularity].)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255411 A149365 First Appellate District, Div. 5 GHOSH (RASH B.) v.
STEINER (PAUL J.)
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255460 D074889 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 D.R. HORTON LOS
ANGELES HOLDING
COMPANY, INC. v.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 996
MILGARD
MANUFACTURING, INC.
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255514 B287170 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 SEGURA (OLGA) v. CROWN
POLY, INC.
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255525 A153630 First Appellate District, Div. 2 CARMICHAEL (VICTOR) v.
CITY OF PACIFICA
(BLACKMAN)
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255561 A152428 First Appellate District, Div. 5 WESTERN HERITAGE
INSURANCE COMPANY v.
FRANCES TODD, INC.
Depublication request denied (case closed)
The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal is
denied. The court declines to review this matter on its own motion. The matter is now final.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255572 B284995 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 BAE (JUNG H.) v. PARK
(NAM HO)
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255671 G054993 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3 HAGHIGHAT (SOFIA &
HAMID), MARRIAGE OF
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255711 A154024 First Appellate District, Div. 1 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES v. STATE
PERSONNEL BOARD
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 997
(TUCKWELL)
Publication request denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255802 B289488 Second Appellate District, Div. 4 CULBERSON II (ROGER L.)
v. WALT DISNEY PARKS &
RESORTS
Publication requests denied (case closed)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255273 B290897 Second Appellate District, Div. 5 PEOPLE v. ZAYAS (FAVIAN
EDUARDO)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 14, 2019.
S255529 A154039 First Appellate District, Div. 4 PEOPLE v. LIVELY (ERIC J.)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 14, 2019.
S255544 C085652 Third Appellate District PEOPLE v. BROWNLEE
(BENJAMIN JUSTIN)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 15, 2019.
S255774 B293891 Second Appellate District, Div. 1 C. (EDGAR) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 9, 2019.
S255784 C079835 Third Appellate District NATIONAL ASIAN
AMERICAN COALITION v.
NEWSOM (GAVIN C.)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 9, 2019.
S255791 B283197 Second Appellate District, Div. 7 PEOPLE v. DELGADO
(OMAR)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 998
August 12, 2019.
S255826 D074028 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 1 PEOPLE v. S.C. (JONES)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 14, 2019.
S255846 B296996 Second Appellate District, Div. 6 BUNDLEY (LERON
DESHONE) v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 14, 2019.
S255859 B280116 Second Appellate District, Div. 8 STOKES (JAMES) v.
MUSCHINSKE (MARTIN
FREDERICK)
The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to
August 15, 2019.
S065877 PEOPLE v. LOPEZ (BOBBY)
& TRUJEQUE (JAMES)
Extension of time granted
Based upon counsel Joseph Baxter’s representation that appellant Bobby Lopez’s opening brief is
anticipated to be filed by October 31. 2019, an extension of time in which to serve and file that
brief is granted to September 3, 2019. After that date, only one further extension totaling about 57
additional days is contemplated.
An application to file an overlength brief must be served and filed no later than 60 days before the
anticipated filing date. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.631(d)(1)(A)(ii) & (B)(ii).)
S127119 PEOPLE v. GIVENS (TODD)
Application to file over-length brief granted
Good cause appearing, appellant’s “Application to File Overlength Reply Brief,” filed on June 12,
2019, is granted. The appellant’s reply brief must not exceed 59,000 words.
S139702 PEOPLE v. BRACAMONTES
(MANUEL)
Extension of time granted
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 999
Based upon Senior Deputy State Public Defender A. J. Kutchins’s representation that the
appellant’s reply brief is anticipated to be filed by September 13, 2019, an extension of time in
which to serve and file that brief is granted to September 13, 2019. After that date, no further
extension is contemplated.
An application to file an overlength brief must be served and filed no later than 60 days before the
anticipated filing date. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.631(d)(1)(A)(ii) & (B)(ii).)
S151493 PEOPLE v. CARDENAS
(REFUGIO RUBEN)
Extension of time granted
Based upon Assistant State Public Defender Jessica K. McGuire’s representation that the
appellant’s reply brief is anticipated to be filed by September 4, 2019, an extension of time in
which to serve and file that brief is granted to September 4, 2019. After that date, no further
extension will be granted.
S169090 PEOPLE v. CHOYCE
(WILLIAM JENNINGS)
Extension of time granted
The application of appellant for relief from default for the failure to timely file appellant’s request
for extension of time is granted.
Based upon counsel William Hassler’s representation that the appellant’s reply brief is anticipated
to be filed by October 31, 2019, counsel’s request for an extension of time in which to serve and
file that brief is granted to August 26, 2019. After that date, only one further extension totaling
about 67 additional days is contemplated.
An application to file an overlength brief must be served and filed no later than 60 days before the
anticipated filing date. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.631(d)(1)(A)(ii) & (B)(ii).)
S169152 PEOPLE v. COLBERT
(TECUMSEH N.)
Extension of time granted
Upon application of Supervising Deputy State Public Defender Nina Wilder, counsel for
appellant, an extension of time in which to serve and file the appellant’s reply brief is granted to
August 26, 2019. After that date, no further extension is contemplated.
S174232 PEOPLE v. KEMP (DARRYL
THOMAS)
Extension of time granted
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1000
Based upon counsel William D. Farber’s representation that the appellant’s reply brief is
anticipated to be filed by September 3, 2019, an extension of time in which to serve and file that
brief is granted to September 3, 2019. After that date, no further extension is contemplated.
S185810 PEOPLE v. THREATS
(DERLYN RAY)
Extension of time granted
The application of the Superior Court of San Diego County for an extension of time to prepare,
certify for accuracy and send the record as corrected to the California Supreme Court, filed on
June 28, 2019, is granted.
The Superior Court of San Diego County is directed to complete and deliver the clerk’s and
reporter’s transcripts on appeal pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.622(e) on or before
October 1, 2019.
S201205 PEOPLE v. MOORE (RYAN
T.)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is
extended to August 27, 2019.
S202817 PEOPLE v. FIERROS, JR.,
(EUSEBIO)
Extension of time granted
Good cause appearing and based upon counsel Danalynn Pritz’s representation that the appellant’s
opening brief is anticipated to be filed by September 16, 2019, counsel’s request for an extension
of time in which to serve and file that brief is granted to August 27, 2019. After that date, only
one further extension totaling about 19 additional days is contemplated.
An application to file an overlength brief must be served and filed no later than 60 days before the
anticipated filing date. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.631(d)(1)(A)(ii) & (B)(ii).)
S211060 PEOPLE v. GALVAN
(ROBERT)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is
extended to September 3, 2019.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1001
S212376 PEOPLE v. JOHN (EMRYS
JUSTIN) & MILLER
(TYRONE L.)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant Emrys J. John, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s
opening brief is extended to September 13, 2019.
S212376 PEOPLE v. JOHN (EMRYS
JUSTIN) & MILLER
(TYRONE L.)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant Tyrone Miller, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s
opening brief is extended to September 13, 2019.
S214846 SATELE (WILLIAM TUPUA)
ON H.C.
Extension of time granted
Based upon Deputy Attorney General Stacy S. Schwartz’s representation that the informal
response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is anticipated to be filed by September 6, 2019,
an extension of time in which to serve and file that document is granted to September 6, 2019.
After that date, no further extension is contemplated.
S219382 PEOPLE v. THOMAS, JR.,
(HILBERT PINEIL)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is
extended to September 3, 2019.
S220097 PEOPLE v. WEST (ERRAN
LANE)
Extension of time granted
Based upon counsel Michael Clough’s representation that the appellant’s opening brief is
anticipated to be filed by December 1, 2019, an extension of time in which to serve and file that
brief is granted to August 23, 2019. After that date, only two further extensions totaling about
100 additional days are contemplated.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1002
An application to file an overlength brief must be served and filed no later than 60 days before the
anticipated filing date. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.631(d)(1)(A)(ii) & (B)(ii).)
S221158 PEOPLE v. CISNEROS
(LEONARDO ALBERTO)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is
extended to August 30, 2019.
S221846 PEOPLE v. HALEY (KEVIN
BERNARD)
Extension of time granted
On application of appellant, it is ordered that the time to serve and file appellant’s opening brief is
extended to September 6, 2019.
S235017 PEOPLE v. MARTIN
(ROMAINE ULYSES)
Order appointing State Public Defender filed
Upon request of appellant for appointment of counsel, the Office of the State Public Defender is
hereby appointed to represent appellant Romaine Ulyses Martin for the direct appeal in the above
automatic appeal now pending in this court.
S116307 PEOPLE v. FLORES III
(ALFRED)
Order filed
Appellant’s “Application for Leave to File Second Supplemental Opening Brief,” filed on
June 20, 2019, is granted. Respondent must serve and file a second supplemental respondent’s
brief no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Appellant may serve and file a second
supplemental appellant’s reply brief no later than 30 days after the second supplemental
respondent brief is filed.
S127119 PEOPLE v. GIVENS (TODD)
Order filed
Appellant’s application for relief from default is denied without prejudice to renewal when the
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1003
appellant’s reply brief is submitted for filing.
S130495 MASTERS (JARVIS J.) ON
H.C.
Order filed
Petitioner’s “Application to File Under Seal Reply to Response to Motion to Delay Submission of
the Case for Further Development of the Record,” filed June 18, 2019, is granted. In ordering this
sealing, this court makes the findings required by California Rules of Court, rules 2.550(d) and
8.46(e). The Clerk is directed to file under seal the unredacted version of petitioner’s “Reply to
Response to Motion to Delay Submission of the Case for Further Development of the Record,”
which was received on June 18, 2019, and to publicly file the redacted version received the same
date.
Petitioner’s “Motion to Delay Submission of the Case for Further Development of the Record,”
filed June 12, 2019, is granted in part as follows. Petitioner’s motion, the Attorney General’s
response, petitioner’s reply thereto, and Sealed Exhibit 54-A are incorporated into the record for
this cause. The motion is otherwise denied.
This cause was ordered submitted on June 4, 2019, and remains under submission.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S168441 PEOPLE v. McKNIGHT
(ANTHONY)
Order filed
Appellant’s “Application for Leave to File Supplemental Opening Brief,” filed on June 18, 2019,
is granted. Respondent must serve and file a supplemental respondent’s brief no later than 30
days from the date of this order. Appellant may serve and file a supplemental appellant’s reply
brief no later than 30 days after the supplemental respondent’s brief is filed.
S255308 ACCUSATION OF NGUYEN
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255473 ACCUSATION OF RIVERA
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1004
S255632 ACCUSATION OF JOHNSON,
SR.
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255879 ACCUSATION OF AVILES-
ROTHCHILD
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255908 ACCUSATION OF CRAIG
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256030 ACCUSATION OF
COLEBROOK
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256216 ACCUSATION OF LINTON
Petition denied (accusation)
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S254967 ALBERT ON DISCIPLINE
Petition for review denied; recommended discipline imposed
The request to correct or augment the record and/or for judicial notice is denied. The petition for
writ of review is denied.
The court orders that LENORE LuANN ALBERT (Respondent), State Bar Number 210876, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following
conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of the first six months of
probation, and Respondent will remain suspended until the following requirements are
satisfied:
i. Respondent makes restitution to the following payees or such other recipient as may be
designated by the Office of Probation or the State Bar Court (or reimburses the Client
Security Fund, to the extent of any payment from the Fund to such payee, in accordance
with Business and Professions Code section 6140.5) and furnishes satisfactory proof to
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1005
the State Bar’s Office of Probation in Los Angeles:
(1) Dr. Nira Schwartz-Woods in the amount of $20,000 plus 10 percent interest per
year from April 1, 2016; and
(2) Fin City Foods in the amount of $47.00.
ii. If Respondent remains suspended for two years or longer as a result of not satisfying
the preceding requirement, Respondent must also provide proof to the State Bar Court
of rehabilitation, fitness to practice and present learning and ability in the general law
before the suspension will be terminated. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, tit. IV, Stds. for
Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct, std. 1.2(c)(1).)
2. Respondent must also comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Decision filed on January 9, 2019.
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts
specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after
the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension.
Respondent must also maintain the records of compliance as required by the conditions of
probation.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S255352 HENDERSON ON
DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that SHANNON MARIE HENDERSON (Respondent), State Bar Number
216104, is suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period
of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for one year subject to the
following conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of the first 60 days of
probation, and Respondent will remain suspended until the following requirements are
satisfied:
i. Respondent makes restitution to Russell O’Coy, or such other recipient as may be
designated by the Office of Probation or the State Bar Court, in the amount of $13,400
plus 10 percent interest per year from December 4, 2015 (or reimburses the Client
Security Fund to the extent of any payment from the Fund to such payee, in accordance
with Business and Professions Code section 6140.5) and furnishes satisfactory proof to
the State Bar’s Office of Probation in Los Angeles; and
ii. If Respondent remains suspended for two years or longer as a result of not satisfying
the preceding requirement, Respondent must also provide proof to the State Bar Court
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1006
of rehabilitation, fitness to practice and present learning and ability in the general law
before the suspension will be terminated. (Rules Proc. of State Bar, tit. IV, Stds. for
Atty. Sanctions for Prof. Misconduct, std. 1.2(c)(1)).
2. Respondent must also comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
March 8, 2019.
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must also take and pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
within one year after the effective date of this order, or during the period of suspension, whichever
is longer and provide satisfactory proof of such passage to the State Bar’s Office of Probation in
Los Angeles within the same period. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 9.10(b).)
If Respondent remains suspended for 90 days or more, Respondent must also comply with rule
9.20 of the California Rules of Court and perform the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of
that rule within 120 and 130 calendar days, respectively, after the effective date of this order.
Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension. Respondent must also maintain the
records of compliance as required by the conditions of probation.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255353 RATZLAFF ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that RUTH ELLEN RATZLAFF (Respondent), State Bar Number 87615, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for one year subject to the following
conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 60 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
March 8, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department
in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on March 8, 2019. Failure to do so may result in
suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1007
and as a money judgment.
S255355 McGHEE ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that PERFISITY McGHEE (Respondent), State Bar Number 81234, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following
conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 30 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
February 26, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department
in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on February 26, 2019. Failure to do so may result in
suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255358 PEREZ ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that GEORGE GARCIA PEREZ (Respondent), State Bar Number 226515, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for one year subject to the following
conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 30 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
March 4, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department
in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on March 4, 2019. Failure to do so may result in
suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1008
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255359 RONCA ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed: disbarred
The court orders that STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER RONCA (Respondent), State Bar Number
183255, is disbarred from the practice of law in California and that Respondent’s name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys.
Respondent must comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified
in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the
effective date of this order.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255480 ANDERSON ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed: disbarred
The court orders that ERNEST LINFORD ANDERSON (Respondent), State Bar Number 44784,
is disbarred from the practice of law in California and that Respondent’s name is stricken from the
roll of attorneys.
Respondent must comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified
in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the
effective date of this order.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255481 ASTAN ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that ADAM ASTAN (Respondent), State Bar Number 300857, is suspended
from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of suspension is
stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for one year subject to the following conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first sixty days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
March 14, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1009
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department
in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on March 14, 2019. Failure to do so may result in
suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255488 THOMPSON ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that TRENT WAYNE THOMPSON (Respondent), State Bar Number 214367, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for two years, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following
conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 90 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
February 15, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department
in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on February 15, 2019. Failure to do so may result in
suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Respondent must also comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts
specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after
the effective date of this order. Failure to do so may result in disbarment or suspension.
Respondent must also maintain the records of compliance as required by the conditions of
probation.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255490 RAFALOVICH ON
DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed: disbarred
The court orders that STEVEN ROBERT RAFALOVICH (Respondent), State Bar Number
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1010
217976, is disbarred from the practice of law in California and that Respondent’s name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys.
Respondent must comply with California Rules of Court, rule 9.20, and perform the acts specified
in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 calendar days, respectively, after the
effective date of this order.
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
S255493 SMITH ON DISCIPLINE
Recommended discipline imposed
The court orders that SANDRA LYNETTE SMITH (Respondent), State Bar Number 172881, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for one year subject to the following
conditions:
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 30 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on
February 21, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department
in its Order Approving Stipulation filed on February 21, 2019. Failure to do so may result in
suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment. One-third of the costs must be paid with Respondent’s annual fees for
each of the years 2020, 2021, and 2022. If Respondent fails to pay any installment as described
above, or as may be modified in writing by the State Bar or the State Bar Court, the remaining
balance is due and payable immediately.
S255983 FUERY ON DISCIPLINE
Petition for review denied; recommended discipline imposed
The petition for review is denied.
The court orders that JOHN JOSEPH FUERY (Respondent), State Bar Number 177634, is
suspended from the practice of law in California for one year, execution of that period of
suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following
conditions:
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1011
1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 60 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the
Review Department of the State Bar Court in its Opinion filed on March 29, 2019; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions
of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be
terminated.
Respondent must provide to the State Bar’s Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the
Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Review Department
in its Opinion filed on March 29, 2019. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 9.10(b).)
Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section
6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7
and as a money judgment.
Kruger, J., was absent and did not participate.
S256687 ASHLEY ON RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of STEPHEN STRATTON ASHLEY, State Bar
Number 70032, as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
S256688 BLAIN ON RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of SUE BLAIN, State Bar Number 157724, as an
attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
S256689 CHASE ON RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of CYNTHIA LOUISE CHASE, State Bar
Number 153877, as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
S256690 CONKLIN ON
RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of MICHAEL JOSEPH CONKLIN, State Bar
Number 40735, as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
SAN FRANCISCO JULY 10, 2019 1012
S256691 FISHER ON RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of MICHAEL TYLER FISHER, State Bar Number
150823, as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
S256692 GOLDBERG ON
RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of SEYMOUR S. GOLDBERG, State Bar Number
28088, as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
S256693 JOHNSON ON
RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of DEBRA PAULINE JOHNSON, State Bar
Number 131123, as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.
S256694 STAMEY ON RESIGNATION
Voluntary resignation accepted
The court orders that the voluntary resignation of VIJA K. STAMEY, State Bar Number 129257,
as an attorney of the State Bar of California is accepted.