Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
description
Transcript of Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Academically Productive Talk in Mathematics: A Means of Making Sense of Mathematical Ideas
Tennessee Department of EducationElementary School MathematicsGrade 1
Rationale Effective teaching requires being able to support students as they work on challenging tasks without taking over the process of thinking for them (NCTM, 2000). Building a practice of engaging students in academically rigorous tasks supported by Accountable Talk® discourse facilitates effective teaching. Students develop an understanding of mathematical ideas, strategies, and representations and teachers gain insights into what students know and what they can do. These insights prepare teachers to consider ways that advance student understanding of mathematical ideas, strategies, or connections to representations. Today, by analyzing math classroom discussions, teachers will study how Accountable Talk discussion supports student learning and helps teachers to maintain the cognitive demand of the task.
2Accountable Talk® is a registered trademark of the University of Pittsburgh
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Session Goals
Participants will:
• learn a set of Accountable Talk features and indicators; and
• recognize Accountable Talk stems for each of the features of talk, and consider the potential benefit of posting and practicing talk stems with students.
3
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Overview of Activities
Participants will:
• discuss Accountable Talk features and indicators;
• discuss students’ solution paths for a task;
• analyze and identify Accountable Talk features and indicators in a lesson; and
• plan for an Accountable Talk discussion.
4
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Structure and Routines of a Lesson
The Explore Phase/Private Work TimeGenerate Solutions
The Explore Phase/Small Group Problem Solving
1. Generate and Compare Solutions2. Assess and advance Student Learning
Share Discuss and Analyze Phase of the Lesson1. Share and Model2. Compare Solutions3. Focus the Discussion on Key
Mathematical Ideas 4. Engage in a Quick Write
MONITOR: Teacher selects examples for the Share, Discuss,and Analyze Phase based on:• Different solution paths to the same task• Different representations• Errors • Misconceptions
SHARE: Students explain their methods, repeat others’ ideas, put ideas into their own words, add on to ideas and ask for clarification. REPEAT THE CYCLE FOR EACH
SOLUTION PATH
COMPARE: Students discuss similarities and difference between solution paths.FOCUS: Discuss the meaning of mathematical ideas in each representationREFLECT: Engage students in a Quick Write or a discussion of the process.
Set Up the TaskSet Up of the Task
5
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Features and Indicators
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Discussion
• Study the Accountable Talk features and indicators.
• Turn and Talk with your partner about what you would expect teachers and students to be saying during an Accountable Talk discussion for each of the features.
− accountability to the learning community− accountability to accurate, relevant knowledge− accountability to discipline-specific standards
of rigorous thinking
7
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Discussion
Indicators for all three features must be present in order for the discussion to be an “Accountable Talk Discussion.”
• accountability to the learning community
• accountability to accurate, relevant knowledge• accountability to discipline-specific standards
of rigorous thinking
Why might this be important?
8
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Features and IndicatorsAccountability to the Learning Community
• Active participation in classroom talk.• Listen attentively.• Elaborate and build on each others’ ideas.• Work to clarify or expand a proposition.
Accountability to Knowledge• Specific and accurate knowledge.• Appropriate evidence for claims and arguments.• Commitment to getting it right.
Accountability to Rigorous Thinking• Synthesize several sources of information.• Construct explanations and test understanding of
concepts.• Formulate conjectures and hypotheses.• Employ generally accepted standards of reasoning.• Challenge the quality of evidence and reasoning. 9
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Starters• Work in triads.• On your chart paper, write talk starters for the
Accountable Talk indicators.
A talk starter is the start of a sentence that you might hear from students if they are holding themselves accountable for using Accountable Talk moves.
e.g., I want to add on to ______ (Community move). The denominator of a fraction tells us _____
(Knowledge move).The two equations are equivalent because ____ (Rigor move).
(Work for 5 minutes.)10
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Starters
• What do you notice about the talk starts for the: accountability to the learning community accountability to accurate, relevant knowledge accountability to discipline-specific standards
of rigorous thinking
• What is the distinction between the stems for knowledge and those for rigorous thinking?
• Why should we pay attention to this?
11
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Preparing to Analyze Accountable Talk Features and Indicators in Classroom
Practice
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Make a Ten Task
Use the interlinking cubes to make a structure of ten.
Write a number sentence to describe your structure of ten. Draw a picture for your structure of ten.
Make a second structure of ten that looks different from your first structure of ten. Write a different number sentence for this structure of ten.
13
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Solve the Task(Private Think Time and Small Group Time)• Work privately. Analyze the student work for The Make a
Ten Task in your participant handout.
• Work with others at your table. Hold yourselves accountable for engaging in an Accountable Talk discussion when you discuss the student work.
What do the students understand? How do you know?
How does one solution path differ from the other?
What might be used in the student work to prompt students to think about and discuss the ideas articulated in the standards?
14
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Make a Ten Task: Devon’s Work
15
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Make a Ten Task: David’s Work
16
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Make a Ten Task: Tinesha’s Work
17
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
1.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
1.OA.A.2 Solve word problems that call for addition of three whole numbers whose sum is less than or equal to 20, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
18Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Understand and apply properties of operations and the relationship between addition and subtraction.
1.OA.B.3 Apply properties of operations as strategies to add and subtract. Examples: If 8 + 3 = 11 is known, then 3 + 8 = 11 is also known. (Commutative property of addition.) To add 2 + 6 + 4, the second two numbers can be added to make a ten, so 2 + 6 + 4 = 2 + 10 = 12. (Associative property of addition.)
1.OA.B.4 Understand subtraction as an unknown-addend problem. For example, subtract 10 – 8 by finding the number that makes 10 when added to 8.
19Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Add and subtract within 20.
1.OA.C.5 Relate counting to addition and subtraction (e.g., by counting on 2 to add 2).
1.OA.C.6 Add and subtract within 20, demonstrating fluency for addition and subtraction within 10. Use strategies such as counting on; making ten (e.g., 8 + 6 = 8 + 2 + 4 = 10 + 4 = 14); decomposing a number leading to a ten (e.g., 13 – 4 = 13 – 3 – 1 = 10 – 1 = 9); using the relationship between addition and subtraction (e.g., knowing that 8 + 4 = 12, one knows 12 – 8 = 4); and creating equivalent but easier or known sums (e.g., adding 6 + 7 by creating the known equivalent 6 + 6 + 1 = 12 + 1 = 13).
20Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Work with addition and subtraction equations.
1.OA.D.7 Understand the meaning of the equal sign, and determine if equations involving addition and subtraction are true or false. For example, which of the following equations are true and which are false? 6 = 6, 7 = 8 – 1, 5 + 2 = 2 + 5, 4 + 1 = 5 + 2.
1.OA.D.8 Determine the unknown whole number in an addition or subtraction equation relating three whole numbers. For example, determine the unknown number that makes the equation true in each of the equations 8 + ? = 11, 5 = ? – 3, 6 + 6 = ?.
21Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Table 1: Common Addition and Subtraction Situations
22Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 88, NGA Center/CCSSO
The Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice What would have to happen in order for students to have opportunities to make use of the CCSS for Mathematical Practice?
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of
others.4. Model with mathematics.5. Use appropriate tools strategically.6. Attend to precision.7. Look for and make use of structure.8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.
Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 6-8, NGA Center/CCSSO
23
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Features and Indicators
Which of the Accountable Talk Features and Indicators were illustrated in our discussion?
24
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Using the Accountable Talk Features and Indicators to Analyze
Classroom Practice
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Reflecting on the Lesson
Watch the video.
What are students learning in the Make a Ten Lesson?
Which Accountable Talk features and indicators were illustrated in the video of the Make a Ten lesson?
26
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Features and IndicatorsAccountability to the Learning Community
• Active participation in classroom talk.• Listen attentively.• Elaborate and build on each others’ ideas.• Work to clarify or expand a proposition.
Accountability to Knowledge• Specific and accurate knowledge.• Appropriate evidence for claims and arguments.• Commitment to getting it right.
Accountability to Rigorous Thinking• Synthesize several sources of information.• Construct explanations and test understanding of concepts.• Formulate conjectures and hypotheses.• Employ generally accepted standards of reasoning.• Challenge the quality of evidence and reasoning.
27
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Context for the Make a Ten LessonTeacher: Jennifer DiBrienza School: PS 116District: New York City, District 2Grade Level: First Grade
The lesson was conducted in a first grade classroom. The students have worked with interlocking cubes many times. They have explored ways in which they can use the blocks to make different shapes. They have described the figures that they can make with the interlocking cubes. In this lesson, we observe the Share, Discuss, and Analyze phase of the lesson. The students have worked independently to create two different structures and to write number sentences to describe their structures. Now the students come together to share and discuss each other’s structures.
28
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Structures and Routines of a Lesson
The Explore Phase/Private Work TimeGenerate Solutions
The Explore Phase/Small Group Problem Solving
1. Generate and Compare Solutions2. Assess and advance Student Learning
Share Discuss and Analyze Phase of the Lesson1. Share and Model2. Compare Solutions3. Focus the Discussion on Key
Mathematical Ideas 4. Engage in a Quick Write
MONITOR: Teacher selects examples for the Share, Discuss,and Analyze Phase based on:• Different solution paths to the same task• Different representations• Errors • Misconceptions
SHARE: Students explain their methods, repeat others’ ideas, put ideas into their own words, add on to ideas and ask for clarification. REPEAT THE CYCLE FOR EACH
SOLUTION PATH
COMPARE: Students discuss similarities and difference between solution paths.FOCUS: Discuss the meaning of mathematical ideas in each representationREFLECT: Engage students in a Quick Write or a discussion of the process.
Set Up the TaskSet Up of the Task
29
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
The Make a Ten Lesson
30
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Examine the first grade CCSS for Mathematics in your participant handout.
– Which CCSS for Mathematical Content did we discuss?
– Which CCSS for Mathematical Practice did we use when solving and discussing the task?
31
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
1.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
1.OA.A.2 Solve word problems that call for addition of three whole numbers whose sum is less than or equal to 20, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
32Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Understand and apply properties of operations and the relationship between addition and subtraction.
1.OA.B.3 Apply properties of operations as strategies to add and subtract. Examples: If 8 + 3 = 11 is known, then 3 + 8 = 11 is also known. (Commutative property of addition.) To add 2 + 6 + 4, the second two numbers can be added to make a ten, so 2 + 6 + 4 = 2 + 10 = 12. (Associative property of addition.)
1.OA.B.4 Understand subtraction as an unknown-addend problem. For example, subtract 10 – 8 by finding the number that makes 10 when added to 8.
33Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Add and subtract within 20.
1.OA.C.5 Relate counting to addition and subtraction (e.g., by counting on 2 to add 2).
1.OA.C.6 Add and subtract within 20, demonstrating fluency for addition and subtraction within 10. Use strategies such as counting on; making ten (e.g., 8 + 6 = 8 + 2 + 4 = 10 + 4 = 14); decomposing a number leading to a ten (e.g., 13 – 4 = 13 – 3 – 1 = 10 – 1 = 9); using the relationship between addition and subtraction (e.g., knowing that 8 + 4 = 12, one knows 12 – 8 = 4); and creating equivalent but easier or known sums (e.g., adding 6 + 7 by creating the known equivalent 6 + 6 + 1 = 12 + 1 = 13).
34Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA
Work with addition and subtraction equations.
1.OA.D.7 Understand the meaning of the equal sign, and determine if equations involving addition and subtraction are true or false. For example, which of the following equations are true and which are false? 6 = 6, 7 = 8 – 1, 5 + 2 = 2 + 5, 4 + 1 = 5 + 2.
1.OA.D.8 Determine the unknown whole number in an addition or subtraction equation relating three whole numbers. For example, determine the unknown number that makes the equation true in each of the equations 8 + ? = 11, 5 = ? – 3, 6 + 6 = ?.
35Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 15, NGA Center/CCSSO
Table 1: Common Addition and Subtraction Situations
36Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 88, NGA Center/CCSSO
Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice What would have to happen in order for students to have opportunities to make use of the CCSS for Mathematical Practice?
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of
others.4. Model with mathematics.5. Use appropriate tools strategically.6. Attend to precision.7. Look for and make use of structure.8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.
Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 6-8, NGA Center/CCSSO
37
Linking to Research/LiteratureConnections Between Representations
Pictures
WrittenSymbols
ManipulativeModels
Real-worldSituations
Oral Language
Adapted from Lesh, Post, & Behr, 1987
38
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Accountable Talk Discussion
Successful teachers are skillful in building shared contexts of the mind (not merely assuming them) and assuring that there is equity and access to these experiences. Talk about these experiences for all members of the classroom are a necessary part of the experience. Over time, these contexts of the mind and collective experiences with talk lead to the development of a "discourse community"—with shared understandings, ways of speaking, and new discursive tools with which to explore and generate knowledge. In this way, an intellectual "commonwealth" can be built on a base of tremendous sociocultural diversity.
Accountable Talk Sourcebook: For Classroom Conversation that Works (IFL, 2010) ℠
39
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Giving it a Go: Planning for an Accountable Talk Discussion• Identify a person who will be the teacher of the lesson.• Others in the group will engage in the lesson once the
lesson has been planned.• Plan the lesson together. Actually write questions that the
teacher will ask and anticipate participant responses.
40
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Focus of Lesson
Students share two structures. The teacher’s goal for the lesson is to help students understand the connections between the two structures. (Associative Property of Addition)
(2 + 5) + 3 and 2 + (5 + 3).
41
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Reflecting on the Accountable Talk Discussion
• Step back from the discussion. What are some patterns that you notice?
• What mathematical ideas does the teacher want students to discover and discuss?
42
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
A Wondering…
• What will you keep in mind when attempting to engage students in Accountable Talk discussions?
• What does it take to maintain the demands of a cognitively demanding task during the lesson so that you have a rigorous mathematics lesson?
• What role does talk play?
43
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Bridge to Practice • Plan a lesson with colleagues. Select a high-level task.• Anticipate student responses. Discuss ways in which you will engage
students in talk that is accountable to the learning community, to knowledge, and to standards of rigorous thinking. Specifically, list the moves and the questions that you will ask during the lesson.
• Engage students in an Accountable Talk discussion. Ask a colleague to scribe a segment of your lesson, or audio or video tape your own lesson and transcribe it later.
• Analyze the Accountable Talk discussion in the transcribed segment of the talk. Identify talk moves and the purpose that the moves served in the lesson. Have a segment of the transcript so you can identify specific moves.
44