Supporting EBR Conversations
Transcript of Supporting EBR Conversations
Supporting EBR Conversations
Admin Team 4/18/16
Purpose of today…
is about creating, maintaining and supporting effective conversations about EBR.
Why is this important?
55% of our courses EBR in 2016-17
65% projected for 2017-18
EBR at SHS 2016-17
We are somewhere around here
Law of Diffusion of Innovation
Where is your division?
This variance creates a need for…
Coherence and Clarity
Shared Responsibility
Creating Coherence and Clarity
four principles of EBR
address common conversations in each
principle
tools to support these conversations
1. Grades are based on a calibrated professional interpretation of student-produced evidence.
• Teacher is the grade giver • No averaging
2. FEEDBACK IS THE GRADE! • Does the student know their areas of growth/mastery? Have
they attempted to re-apply the feedback?
3. Evidence of Growth and Mastery • Body of work with consideration to how a student is growing.
4. Trust the Assessment Evidence! • Can the teacher use (common) assessments to explain a grade?
Clarity Starts Here: EBR Core Principles
1. Grades are based on a calibrated professional interpretation of student-produced evidence.
• Teacher is the grade giver • No averaging
2. FEEDBACK IS THE GRADE! • Does the student know their areas of growth/mastery? Have
they attempted to re-apply the feedback?
3. Evidence of Growth and Mastery • Body of work with consideration to how a student is growing.
4. Trust the Assessment Evidence! • Can the teacher use (common) assessments to explain a grade?
Hundo P! or It Me or Struggle Bus?
1. Grades are based on a calibrated professional interpretation of student-produced evidence.
• Teacher is the grade giver • No averaging
2. FEEDBACK IS THE GRADE! • Does the student know their areas of growth/mastery? Have
they attempted to re-apply the feedback?
3. Evidence of Growth and Mastery • Body of work with consideration to how a student is growing.
4. Trust the Assessment Evidence! • Can the teacher use (common) assessments to explain a grade?
EBR Core Principle #1
Anchor Question
Do We Have Enough Of The Right Evidence?
Conversation Support Tool
Supporting/Loading Proficiency Development Proficiency Evaluation
Assessment Evidence Organizer
Conversation Support Tool
Align the definition with either Supporting/Loading, PD, PE?
Assessments that are ungraded
Used to develop prerequisite skills
used for feedback
Low or No Stakes
Assessments that are graded
Used to create proficiency
creates self and teacher awareness, reflection, feedback
Low or No Stakes
Assessments that are graded
Used to determine
proficiency
High stakes
creates perspective
(both self third party)
Conversation Support Tool
Supporting/Loading Proficiency Development Proficiency Evaluation
Assessments that are ungraded
Used to develop supporting/pre-req
skills
used for feedback
Low or No Stakes
Assessments that are graded
Used to create/develop proficiency
Same ‘how well’ as PE assessments
creates self and teacher awareness, reflection,
feedback
Low or No Stakes
Assessments that are graded
Used to determine proficiency
High stakes
creates perspective (both self and third
party)
Assessment Evidence Organizer
Conversation Support Tool
Supporting/Loading Proficiency Development Proficiency Evaluation
HMWK 1
QUIZ 1
QUIZ 2
QUIZ 3
PROJECT 1
HWMK 3
TEST 2
QUIZ 4
TEST 1
PROJECT 2
HMWK 2
Assessment Evidence Organizer
What new insights are you
making as a result of this discussion?
In what ways can you connect
your current work and the
content presented in this
segment?
How might you continue to engage in
conversations around this
topic?
What are some examples that you or teams/teachers you have seen around
this topic? How might they serve as
resources for others?
1. Grades are based on a calibrated professional interpretation of student-produced evidence.
• Teacher is the grade giver • No averaging
2. FEEDBACK IS THE GRADE! • Does the student know their areas of growth/mastery? Have
they attempted to re-apply the feedback?
3. Evidence of Growth and Mastery • Body of work with consideration to how a student is growing.
4. Trust the Assessment Evidence! • Can the teacher use (common) assessments to explain a grade?
EBR Core Principle #2
Anchor Question
• How active is the reporting system (reflection structure, grade book, etc.) during the learning process? • Can it/does it support conversations about
learning?
EBR Feedback Components
What students need to know in an EBR system:
1. How am I Growing?
2. How am I Doing?
3. How am I Acting?
Conversation Support Tool
Scale
Learning-Target Based?
Achievement, Growth, Behavior data separate and evident?
Formatives feedback separate from Summatives feedback?
Re-performance feedback evident?
Patterns of averaging used?
Feedback Score Card
O’Connor 2009
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Each group use the Feedback
Score Card with the sample
grade book at your table.
Check In. Any Insights? Any Questions?
1. Grades are based on a calibrated professional interpretation of student-produced evidence.
• Teacher is the grade giver • No averaging
2. FEEDBACK IS THE GRADE! • Does the student know their areas of growth/mastery? Have
they attempted to re-apply the feedback?
3. Evidence of Growth and Mastery • Body of work with consideration to how a student is growing.
4. Trust the Assessment Evidence! • Can the teacher use (common) assessments to explain a grade?
EBR Core Principle #3
Anchor Question
Aggregate first, then Analyze?
or do you…
Analyze first, then Aggregate?
Todd Rose - The End of Average
When grading do you….
Remember EBR grading is….
Body of work with consideration to growth
Conversation Support Tool
Standard Name Body of Work (Modal Matrix)
Growth Score (Last 3 scores)
Most Recent (Last Score) Comments
Reading
Writing
Listening Speaking
Conversation Support Tool
Standard Name Body of Work (Modal Matrix)
Growth Score (Last 3 scores)
Most Recent (Last Score) Comments
Standard 1
Standard 2
Standard 3
What is the proper grade?
Reading Wri*ng Listen & Speak2 2 2 2 3
2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 4
2 2 2 3 3
Sep.
Dec.
Modal Matrix
4 3 2 1
4-3 4-1 2-3 1-4
4-2 3-2 3-1 1-3
3-4 2-4 2-1 1-2
Conversation Support Tool
Standard Name Body of Work (Modal Matrix)
Growth Score (Last 3 scores)
Most Recent (Last Score) Comments
Reading 2-3 2,2,3 3
Writing 3-2 3,3,4 4
Listening Speaking 2-3 2,3,3 3
Body of Work with Consideration to Growth
Standard Name Body of Work (Modal Matrix)
Growth Score (Last 3 scores)
Most Recent (Last Score) Comments
Reading 2-3 2,2,3 3
Writing 3-2 3,3,4 4
Listening Speaking 2-3 2,3,3 3
So…the grade then?
GD Comparison
Does EBR cause grade inflation?
We started EBR so students can more accurately answer the following questions:
“where am I at in my learning and how do I get better?”
If EBR is working then grades should go up because kids are able to see how to improve and then be able to
do it!
For Later
Grade Distribution EBR NonEBR Comparison
Open Tableau and search for..
1. Grades are based on a calibrated professional interpretation of student-produced evidence.
• Teacher is the grade giver • No averaging
2. FEEDBACK IS THE GRADE! • Does the student know their areas of growth/mastery? Have
they attempted to re-apply the feedback?
3. Evidence of Growth and Mastery • Body of work with consideration to how a student is growing.
4. Trust the Assessment Evidence! • Can the teacher use (common) assessments to explain a grade?
EBR Core Principle #4
Are your assessments producing reliable evidence about students?
Anchor Question
Evidence is only as good as the assessments!
Remember….
Do my assessments cover all the topics it needs to and are there enough questions?
Are my assessments aligned to my (course’s) expectations?
Do I know ‘everything’ about how the outcome was arrived at?
How involved in the assessment is the student?
Are all my assessments working together?
Shouldn’t everything be used as evidence?
My journey toward reliable evidence
Thematic (Unit) Assessment
Aligned Assessment
Reliable Assessment
Reflective Assessment
Growth Assessment
Process Assessment
Pathway to Reliable Evidence
Conversation Support Tool
Assessment Type Evidence Reliability
Thematic Low
Aligned Medium
Thinking Medium-High
Reflective Medium-High
Growth High
Process High
Where is the majority of your department?
Assessment Type Evidence Reliability
Thematic Low
Aligned Medium
Thinking Medium-High
Reflective Medium-High
Growth High
Process High
Because a
little conversation
wentBLOO
M!
Even the smallest conversation can HAVE A LASTING IMPACT on our learning, initiatives and culture.
Why is this all important?