€¦ · Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11 Kempsey Shire - 1 - Printed on Recycled...
Transcript of €¦ · Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11 Kempsey Shire - 1 - Printed on Recycled...
Supplementary Report 2010/11
State of theEnvironment Report
KEMPSEYShire Council
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 1 - Printed on Recycled Paper
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... 7
ABOUT THE SUPPLEMENTARY SOE REPORT 2010/11 ............................................................ 9
SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 9 AIM ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. 9 SOE REPORT STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................... 9 SNAPSHOT ............................................................................................................................................... 10 ADOPTED REPORTING MODEL ......................................................................................................... 10
CHAPTER 1 TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY............................................................................... 11
1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 11
1.2.1 Kempsey Shire ESD Strategy .............................................................................. 11 1.3 TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE REPORTING .................................................................................. 12 1.4 INDICATORS ............................................................................................................................. 12 1.5 PRIORITY ISSUES ................................................................................................................... 12 STEADY ........................................................................................................................................................ 12
CHAPTER 2 LAND ............................................................................................................................. 17
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................... 17
2.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 20 STATE ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 2.2 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 20 2.4 SOILS .......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.5 REGIONAL SETTING ............................................................................................................... 22 2.6 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................................. 24 2.7 ACID SULFATE SOILS ............................................................................................................ 24 2.8 LAND USE .................................................................................................................................. 26
2.8.1 Urban Settlement ..................................................................................................... 27 2.8.2 Industrial Use............................................................................................................. 28 2.8.3 Primary Industry ....................................................................................................... 28 2.8.4 Open Spaces .............................................................................................................. 28
PRESSURES ............................................................................................................................................. 30 2.10 DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES ................................................................................................ 30 2.11 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND ............................................................................ 31 2.14 LAND DEGRADATION ............................................................................................................ 32
2.14.1 Soil Erosion ................................................................................................................. 32 2.14.2 Acid Sulfate Soils ...................................................................................................... 32 2.14.3 Contaminated Land ................................................................................................. 33
RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................... 33 2.15 STRATEGIC LAND USE PLANNING ................................................................................... 33
2.15.1 Land Capacity Reports............................................................................................ 33 2.15.2 Residential Land Release Strategy (Local Growth Management Strategy – Residential Component) .......................................................................................... 33 2.15.3 Standard LEP .............................................................................................................. 34 The Standard LEP was provided to the DoP in July 2010 seeking a section 65 Certificate. The Standard LEP is scheduled for completion in July 2012. ................... 34 2.15.4 Saltwater (SWR) LEP .............................................................................................. 34 2.15.5 Former Shell Terminal Site (SWR) LEP ............................................................ 34 2.15.6 Slim Dusty Museum ................................................................................................. 34 Construction of the Slim Dusty Centre commenced during the 09/10 reporting period and continued throughout the 2010/11 reporting period. ................................. 34 2.15.7 Industrial Land Review Implementation .......................................................... 34
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 2 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.15.8 Spencerville to New Entrance Investigation .................................................. 35 2.15.9 Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management ................................................... 35 2.15.10 Kempsey Town Centre Master Plan Review ..................................................... 35 2.15.11 Review of South West Rocks Structure Plan ................................................... 35 2.15.12 Macleay Valley Coast Vision 2030 ....................................................................... 36 2.15.13 Kempsey Bypass Strategy ...................................................................................... 36
2.17 ACID SULFATE SOILS MANAGEMENT .............................................................................. 37 2.17.1 Existing Projects ....................................................................................................... 37
2.18 CONTAMINATED LAND REMEDIATION ............................................................................ 38 FUTURE DIRECTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 38 2.19 ACID SULFATE SOILS - PROPOSED PROJECTS ........................................................... 38 2.20 LAND DEGRADATION ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 38 2.21 MAPPING OF POTENTIAL PLUME(S) SURROUNDING FORMER FUEL TERMINAL SITES 39 2.22 STRATEGIC PLANNING PROJECTS ................................................................................... 39
2.22.1 Macleay Valley Coast Vision 2030 ...................................................................... 39 2.22.2 Standard LEP .............................................................................................................. 39 The Standard LEP was provided to the DoP in July 2010 seeking a section 65 Certificate. The Standard LEP is scheduled for completion in July 2012. ................... 39 2.22.3 Residential Land Release Strategy .................................................................... 39 2.22.4 Spencerville to New Entrance Investigation .................................................. 39 2.22.5 Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management ................................................... 39 2.22.6 Review of South West Rocks Structure Plan .................................................. 39 2.22.7 Kempsey Bypass Strategy Implementation .................................................... 39 2.22.8 Rural Residential Component of Residential Local Growth Management Strategy 39 2.22.9 Comprehensive Development Control Plan...................................................... 39 2.22.10 Developer Contribution Plans ................................................................................ 40
CHAPTER 3 WATER ......................................................................................................................... 41
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................... 41
3.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 44 STATE ........................................................................................................................................................ 44 3.2 INLAND WATERS ..................................................................................................................... 44 3.3 RAINFALL ....................................................................................................................................... 45 3.4 RIVER FLOWS ........................................................................................................................... 46 3.5 WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................................................... 47 3.6 FLOODING ................................................................................................................................. 48 3.7 RIPARIAN VEGETATION ........................................................................................................ 48 3.8 AQUATIC HABITAT ................................................................................................................. 49 3.9 GROUNDWATER ....................................................................................................................... 49 3.10 COASTAL WETLANDS, ESTUARIES AND OCEAN ......................................................... 49
3.10.1 Estuarine Habitats .................................................................................................... 49 3.10.2 Coastal Wetlands ...................................................................................................... 50 3.10.3 Beach Habitats .......................................................................................................... 50
PRESSURE ................................................................................................................................................ 50 3.11 SURFACE WATER EXTRACTION ......................................................................................... 50 3.12 GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION ........................................................................................... 51 3.13 WATER POLLUTION ................................................................................................................ 51
3.13.1 Sewage Discharges .................................................................................................. 52 3.13.2 On-Site Sewage Management ............................................................................. 52 3.13.3 Stormwater Pollution .............................................................................................. 53 3.13.4 Historic Mining Activities ........................................................................................ 53 3.13.5 Agricultural Practices .............................................................................................. 54 3.13.6 Acid Sulfate Soils ...................................................................................................... 54 3.13.7 Recreational Users ................................................................................................... 55
3.14 DISTURBANCE OF RIPARIAN ZONES AND WEED INFESTATION .......................... 55
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 3 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.15 LOSS OF FISHERIES HABITAT AND WETLAND DRAINAGE ..................................... 56 3.15.1 Fishing and Fish Kills ............................................................................................... 56
RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................... 58 3.16 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 58 3.17 SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT .................................................. 58
3.17.1 Water Quality Monitoring ...................................................................................... 58 3.17.2 Pollution Reduction Program ................................................................................ 60 3.17.3 Sewage Infrastructure ............................................................................................ 60 3.17.4 Septic Tank Controls ............................................................................................... 60
3.18 ANTIMONY AND ARSENIC DISPERSION IN THE MACLEAY RIVER ....................... 61 3.19 FLOOD MITIGATION .............................................................................................................. 61 3.20 BEACHWATCH .......................................................................................................................... 61 3.21 CATCHMENT EDUCATION .................................................................................................... 63
3.21.1 Waterwise Program ................................................................................................... 63 3.21.2 Waterwatch Program ................................................................................................ 63
3.22 WATERWAY AND WETLAND REHABILITATION AND PROTECTION ...................... 64 3.22.1 Nestle Community Vegetation Projects – Jerseyville & Smithtown ...... 64 3.22.2 Boyters Lane Wetland & Riparian Rehabilitation Project ........................... 64
3.23 ESTUARY MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................... 64 3.24 GILLS BRIDGE CREEK REHABILITATION PROJECT .................................................... 65 FUTURE DIRECTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 65 3.25 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 65 3.26 CATCHMENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS ............................................................................ 65 3.27 ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLANS ........................................................................................ 66 3.28 EMP‟S IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................... 66 3.29 GILLS BRIDGE CREEK REHABILITATION PROJECT .................................................... 66
CHAPTER 4 ATMOSPHERE ........................................................................................................... 67
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................... 67
4.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 68 STATE ........................................................................................................................................................ 68 4.2 CLIMATE ..................................................................................................................................... 68 4.3 AIR POLLUTION ....................................................................................................................... 69 4.4 GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE CHANGE .................................................................. 69 4.5 OZONE LAYER .......................................................................................................................... 70 PRESSURE ................................................................................................................................................ 71 4.6 NUISANCE .................................................................................................................................. 71 4.7 VEHICLE EMISSIONS ............................................................................................................. 72 4.8 BURNING OFF ........................................................................................................................... 72 4.9 SOLID FUEL STOVES AND HEATING ............................................................................... 72 4.10 AGRICULTURE .......................................................................................................................... 72 4.11 LANDFILLING ............................................................................................................................ 72 4.12 SEWER TREATMENT PLANTS (STP) ................................................................................. 73 4.13 DUST ............................................................................................................................................ 73 4.14 BUSHFIRES AND OTHER EMERGENCY SITUATIONS ................................................. 73 RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................... 73 4.15 INDUSTRIAL AUDITS ............................................................................................................. 73 4.16 BASIX – BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY INDEX ............................................................... 73 4.17 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION & ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES ................................ 74
4.17.1 Cities for Climate Protection Program .............................................................. 74 4.17.2 Local Adaptation Pathways Program ................................................................. 74
FUTURE DIRECTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 74 4.18 BASIX .......................................................................................................................................... 75 4.19 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION & ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES ................................ 75
4.19.1 Cities for Climate Protection Program .............................................................. 75
CHAPTER 5 BIODIVERSITY .......................................................................................................... 76
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 4 - Printed on Recycled Paper
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................... 76
5.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 78 STATE ........................................................................................................................................................ 78 5.2 HABITATS WITHIN THE SHIRE .......................................................................................... 78
5.2.1 Local Vegetation Mapping ..................................................................................... 78 5.2.2 Koala Habitat Mapping ............................................................................................. 80
5.3 VEGETATION CORRIDORS .................................................................................................. 81 5.3.1 Why are Corridors Important? ............................................................................ 81 5.3.2 Regional Corridors .................................................................................................... 81 5.3.3 Sub Regional Corridors .......................................................................................... 82 5.3.4 Local Corridors .......................................................................................................... 82 5.3.5 Vegetation Corridors in the Kempsey Shire ................................................... 82
5.4 FLORA .......................................................................................................................................... 82 5.4.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 82 5.4.2 Threatened Flora ...................................................................................................... 82
5.5 FAUNA ......................................................................................................................................... 83 5.5.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 83 5.5.2 Threatened Fauna ...................................................................................................... 84
5.6 ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................. 86 5.6.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 86 5.6.2 Threatened Ecological Communities ................................................................... 86
PRESSURES ............................................................................................................................................. 88 5.7 LAND CLEARING AND DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 88 5.8 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS PROPOSALS ................................................................ 89 5.9 FERAL ANIMALS AND DOMESTIC PETS .......................................................................... 89
5.9.1 Feral animals .............................................................................................................. 89 5.10 EXOTIC PLANTS ....................................................................................................................... 90 5.11 BUSHFIRE .................................................................................................................................. 92 5.12 DISEASE ..................................................................................................................................... 93 RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................... 93 5.13 VEGETATION AND HABITAT MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 93
5.13.1 General Existing Management Measures ........................................................ 93 5.13.2 National Parks, Nature Reserves, State Recreation Areas and other reserves 93 5.13.3 Koala Habitat Mapping and Management ....................................................... 95
5.14 ASSESSMENTS AND RESTORATION ORDERS .............................................................. 95 5.14.1 Threatened Species Assessments ...................................................................... 95 5.14.2 Clean Up Notices....................................................................................................... 95
5.15 EXOTIC ANIMAL CONTROL .................................................................................................. 95 5.15.1 Vertebrate Pests ....................................................................................................... 95 5.15.2 Companion Animals ................................................................................................. 96
5.16 WEED MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................. 96 5.16.1 Council’s Operational Works and Control Programs ................................... 96 5.16.2 Legal Notices ............................................................................................................... 98
5.17 BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................... 98 FUTURE DIRECTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 99 5.18 KEMPSEY SHIRE COMPREHENSIVE KOALA PLAN OF MANAGEMENT .................. 99 5.19 EAST KEMPSEY ISLAND LOWLAND RAINFOREST REGENERATION PROJECT .. 99 5.20 IMPLEMENTATION OF REVIEWED COMPANION ANIMAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 99 5.21 FUTURE WEED CONTROL PROGRAM ............................................................................. 100 5.22 POTENTIAL FUTURE INDIAN MYNA BIRD CONTROL PROGRAM .......................... 100 5.23 ONGOING BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................. 100 5.24 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION STRATEGY ............................................................... 100
CHAPTER 6: HUMAN SETTLEMENTS ...................................................................................... 101
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................. 101
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 5 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 104 STATE ...................................................................................................................................................... 104 6.2 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS .............................................................................. 104
6.2.1 Population Growth .................................................................................................. 104 6.2.2 Population Distribution ......................................................................................... 104 6.2.3 Age Distribution ...................................................................................................... 105 6.2.4 Local Economy ......................................................................................................... 105 6.2.5 Income ....................................................................................................................... 106 6.2.6 Employment ............................................................................................................. 106 6.2.7 Unemployment Rates............................................................................................ 106
6.3 ROADS ...................................................................................................................................... 107 6.3.1 Local & Regional Roads ........................................................................................ 107 6.3.2 Pacific Highway Bypass ........................................................................................ 107
6.4 WATER & SEWAGE ............................................................................................................... 108 6.4.1 Water Consumption ............................................................................................... 108 6.4.2 Sewage Treatment ................................................................................................. 109
6.5 WASTE....................................................................................................................................... 110 6.5.1 Solid Waste ............................................................................................................... 110 6.5.2 Recycling .................................................................................................................... 110
6.6 STORMWATER ........................................................................................................................ 111 PRESSURES ........................................................................................................................................... 111 6.7 POPULATION GROWTH ....................................................................................................... 111 6.8 DEMOGRAPHICS .................................................................................................................... 111 6.9 SETTLEMENT PATTERNS .................................................................................................... 111 6.10 ROADS ...................................................................................................................................... 111
6.10.1 Local & Regional Roads ........................................................................................ 111 6.10.2 Pacific Highway ....................................................................................................... 112
6.11 WATER ACCESSIBILITY ...................................................................................................... 112 6.12 DRINKING WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................. 112 RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................. 112 6.13 ESD STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 112 6.14 NEW PLANNING CONTROLS.............................................................................................. 113 6.15 SHIRE PLANNING PROJECTS ............................................................................................ 114 6.16 ROADS ...................................................................................................................................... 114
6.16.1 Roads Asset Management Plan ......................................................................... 114 6.16.2 Rural Roads Contribution Plan ........................................................................... 114 6.16.3 Pacific Highway Bypass ........................................................................................ 114
6.17 WASTE MANAGEMENT......................................................................................................... 114 6.17.1 Recycling Activities ................................................................................................ 115
6.18 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT ............................................................... 115 6.18.1 Steuart McIntyre Dam .......................................................................................... 116 6.18.2 Bellbrook .................................................................................................................... 116 6.18.3 Willawarrin ................................................................................................................ 117
6.19 SEWAGE TREATMENT .......................................................................................................... 117 6.19.1 Wastewater & Water Reuse Projects ................................................................ 117
6.20 CIVIC MAINTENANCE TEAM ......................................................................................... 117 FUTURE DIRECTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 117 6.21 FUTURE SHIRE PLANNING PROJECTS ........................................................................... 117 6.22 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANS ........................................................................................... 117 6.23 BYPASS STRATEGY ............................................................................................................... 117 6.24 RECYCLING & WASTE MINIMISATION .......................................................................... 118 6.25 WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS................................................................................... 118
6.25.1 Water Supply ........................................................................................................... 118 6.25.2 Future Wastewater & Water Reuse Projects ................................................ 119
CHAPTER 7 ABORIGINAL AND NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE.................................... 120
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................. 120
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 6 - Printed on Recycled Paper
7.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 121 STATE ...................................................................................................................................................... 121 7.2 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE ..................................................................................................... 121
7.2.1 Identified Aboriginal Sites, Structures and Landscapes .......................... 121 7.2.2 Disturbance or Destruction of Aboriginal Sites, Structures and Landscapes ....................................................................................................................................... 123
7.3 EUROPEAN HERITAGE ......................................................................................................... 123 7.3.1 Heritage Listed Sites, Structures and Landscapes .................................... 123
PRESSURE .............................................................................................................................................. 131 RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................. 131 7.4 CONSERVATION AND PLANNING CONTROLS ............................................................ 131
7.4.1 Protection for Aboriginal Heritage Sites ......................................................... 131 7.4.2 Protection for European Settlement Heritage Sites .................................. 132
FUTURE DIRECTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 132 7.5 LOCAL HERITAGE STUDY ................................................................................................. 132
CHAPTER 8 COUNCIL’S ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ....................................... 133
‘SNAPSHOT’ ............................................................................................................................................. 133
8.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 135 STATE ...................................................................................................................................................... 135 8.2 ENERGY CONSUMPTION ..................................................................................................... 135 8.3 FUEL CONSUMPTION ........................................................................................................... 136 8.4 TOTAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ........................................................................ 137 8.5 WATER CONSUMPTION ....................................................................................................... 138 8.6 PAPER USAGE ......................................................................................................................... 140 PRESSURE .............................................................................................................................................. 140 8.7 BUDGET .................................................................................................................................... 140 8.8 INCREASING POPULATION AND SERVICE DEMANDS ............................................. 141 8.9 INCREASING ENERGY PRICES ......................................................................................... 142 RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................................. 142 8.10 ENERGY & GREENHOUSE REPORTS ............................................................................... 142 8.11 GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION GOALS ...................................................................... 143 8.12 EMISSION REDUCTION ACTIVITES FROM VEHICLE FLEET .................................. 143 8.13 WATER SAVING ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................ 143 8.14 TRIAL OF ALTERNATIVE COPY & PRINTING PAPER ................................................. 143 8.15 SUSTAINABLE CHOICE PROGRAM .................................................................................. 143 8.16 ENVIRONMENTAL LEVY WORKS PROGRAM ................................................................ 144 8.17 ESD – TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE REPORTING ................................................................... 145 FUTURE DIRECTIONS ........................................................................................................................ 145 8.18 FURTHER ENERGY & GREENHOUSE REPORTS & BENCHMARKING .................... 145 8.19 ENERGY AUDITS .................................................................................................................... 145 8.20 GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PLAN .......................................................................... 145 8.21 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................................. 145 8.22 FLEET MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................... 146 8.23 WATER SAVING ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................ 146 8.24 ALTERNATIVE COPY & PRINTING PAPER ..................................................................... 146 8.25 STAFF EDUCATION ............................................................................................................... 146 8.26 SUSTAINABLE CHOICE PROGRAM .................................................................................. 146
REFERENCES & FURTHER READING .......................................................................................... 146
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND CURRENT AND FUTURE ACTIONS 13
TABLE 2 - COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPOSED STANDARD LEP AND KLEP 1987 26 TABLE 3 - ESTIMATED RESIDENT POPULATION OF KEMPSEY SHIRE URBAN LOCALITIES 28 TABLE 4 - NUMBER OF KNOWN CURRENT AND FORMER CATTLE TICK DIP SITES IN THE
KEMPSEY SHIRE 29
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 7 - Printed on Recycled Paper
TABLE 5 - COMPLIANCE REGISTER 36 TABLE 6 - GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION VOLUMES 10/11 51
TABLE 7 - SHIRE STW EFFLUENT QUALITY 59 TABLE 8 - KEMPSEY COUNCIL BEACH SUITABILITY GRADE 62
TABLE 9 - LIST OF PREFERRED KOALA FOOD TREES IN EASTERN PORTION OF KEMPSEY SHIRE 80
TABLE 10 – NAME & ADDITIONAL AREA OF LAND GAZETTED AS NATIONAL PARK ESTATE IN 2010-11 81
TABLE 11 - NO. OF THREATENED FLORA SPECIES KNOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN THE KEMPSEY SHIRE 83
TABLE 12 - NO. OF THREATENED FAUNA SPECIES KNOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN THE KEMPSEY
SHIRE 84 TABLE 13 - NO. OF ENDANGERED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES (EEC) & POPULATIONS (EP)
KNOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN THE KEMPSEY SHIRE 87 TABLE 14 - LIST OF NOXIOUS WEEDS IN THE KEMPSEY SHIRE 91 TABLE 15 - RESERVES IN THE KEMPSEY SHIRE 93 TABLE 16 - NEW PLANNING CONTROLS 113
TABLE 17 - THE NUMBER AND NATURE OF ABORIGINAL SITES IN THE KEMPSEY SHIRE 122 TABLE 18 - NUMBER OF SITES ALTERED, DESTROYED, DAMAGED IN 2010-11 IN THE
KEMPSEY SHIRE. 123 TABLE 19 - STATE HERITAGE LISTED ITEMS 124 TABLE 20 - LOCAL & REGIONAL HERITAGE ITEMS 124 TABLE 21 - COUNCIL WATER CONSUMPTION 139 TABLE 22 - KEMPSEY SHIRE COUNCIL BUDGET SUMMARY 141
TABLE 23 - ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL LEVY 144
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - SOIL LANDSCAPES OF THE LOWER MACLEAY 22
FIGURE 2 - REGIONAL SETTING 23
FIGURE 3 - THE AREA AND EXTENT OF ACID SULFATE SOILS 25
FIGURE 4 - NUMBER AND VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 30
FIGURE 5 - INLAND WATERWAYS IN THE KEMPSEY SHIRE LGA 44
FIGURE 6 - CUMULATIVE ANNUAL RAINFALL FOR KEMPSEY (2004 TO JUNE 2011) 45
FIGURE 7 - MONTHLY RAINFALL FOR SELECTED STATIONS 2010/2011 45
FIGURE 8 - LONG TERM AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL FOR SELECTED STATIONS
ACROSS KEMPSEY LGA 46
FIGURE 9 - MACLEAY RIVER FLOWS 47
FIGURE 10 - CAUSES OF FISH KILLS IN NSW 56
FIGURE 11 - COMMERCIAL FISH CATCHES 57
FIGURE 12 - AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND RAINFALL FOR KEMPSEY 68
FIGURE 13 - GREENHOUSE EFFECT VS THE ENHANCED GREENHOUSE EFFECT 70
FIGURE 14 - AIR POLLUTION COMPLAINTS TO COUNCIL 71
FIGURE 15 - LOCAL AND REGIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATES 106
FIGURE 16 - PACIFIC HIGHWAY BYPASS OF KEMPSEY 108
FIGURE 17 - TOTAL WATER CONSUMPTION 109
FIGURE 18 - VOLUME OF WASTE TO LANDFILL 110
FIGURE 19 - TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION, COST AND ASSOCIATED
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FOR COUNCIL OPERATED
BUILDINGS & FACILITIES 135
FIGURE 20 - COUNCIL FUEL CONSUMPTION, COST & GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS 137
FIGURE 21 - TOTAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM ALL SOURCES 137
FIGURE 22 - EMISSIONS BY SOURCE 2010-11 138
FIGURE 23 - COUNCIL WATER CONSUMPTION 139
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 8 - Printed on Recycled Paper
ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics
AGO Australian Greenhouse Office
ASS Acid Sulfate Soils
CAR Comprehensive, Adequate and Representative
CKPoM Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management
CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons
DA Development Application
DCP Development Control Plan
DECCW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
DEWHA Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts
DO Dissolved Oxygen
DOP Department of Planning
DII Department of Industry & Investment
EMP Estuary Management Plan
ESD Ecologically Sustainable Development
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IWCMS Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy
KSC Kempsey Shire Council
KTPs Key Threatening Processes
KWR&DF Kempsey Waste Receival and Disposal Facility
LEMP Landfill Environmental Management Plan
LEP Local Environmental Plan
LES Local Environmental Study
LHPA Livestock Health & Pest Authority
NRCMA Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority
OSM On-site Sewage Management
OSMS On-site Sewage Management System‟s
PSR Pressure-State-Response
PRP Pollution Reduction Plan
RFS Rural Fire Service
RTA Roads and Traffic Authority
SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy
SoE State of the Environment
STP Sewage Treatment Plant
STW Sewage Treatment Works
SWR South West Rocks
TBL Triple Bottom Line
TCM Total Catchment Management
UV Ultraviolet
UNE University of New England
WTP Water Treatment Plant
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 9 - Printed on Recycled Paper
ABOUT THE SUPPLEMENTARY SOE REPORT 2010/11
SUMMARY
The following Supplementary State of the Environment (SoE) Report has been
prepared for the Kempsey Shire LGA for the period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011,
in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act (1993), taking into
account the 1997 amendments to the Act. This report builds on the last
Comprehensive SoE Report prepared in 2008/09 and associated Supplementary
Reports.
Since the Comprehensive Report prepared back in 2003/04, significant progress has
been made on a number of community environmental projects as well as integrating
environmental management and reporting mechanisms into Council operations. The
development and adoption of the Kempsey Shire Ecologically Sustainable Development
(ESD) Strategy in 2007 was a significant achievement and has allowed for a more
strategic approach to the delivery of various environmental and sustainability projects
across the Shire.
For a detailed list of projects commenced and, or completed during the 2010-11
reporting period refer to Table 1 in Chapter 1 – Towards Sustainability.
AIM
The aim of this SoE Report is to provide an update on Kempsey Shire‟s progress
towards sustainability and the trends in environmental indicators of the core
environmental sectors; the land, water, atmosphere (encompassing noise),
biodiversity, human settlements (encompassing waste) and Aboriginal and non-
Aboriginal heritage. While doing so the report will provide a “snapshot” of the present
day environment in Kempsey Shire with that of previous years and identify any new
environmental pressures since the previous report.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the 2010/11 Supplementary State of the Environment Report are
summarised as follows:
To provide a snapshot of the state of the environment of the Kempsey Shire in the
year 2010/2011 to enable monitoring of Council and the communities performance
in moving towards sustainability.
To identify any new environmental pressures and comment on trends in
environmental indicators of core environmental sectors; the land, water,
atmosphere, biodiversity, human settlements, Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal
heritage.
To provide usable information and data to enable more effective environmental
decision-making across all departments of Council.
To identify future reporting requirements with regard to data and information
collection to establish appropriate environmental indicators.
To provide open and transparent accountability of Council‟s operations and
environmental performance.
To observe and quantify changes in the state of the environment to allow Council
to put in place appropriate responses or to gauge the success of those responses
already enacted.
SOE REPORT STRUCTURE
The core structure of the 2010/11 Supplementary Report will remain fundamentally
the same as the previous comprehensive and associated supplementary SoE Reports.
The Report has been organised into the following Chapters:
Chapter 1 – Towards Sustainability
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 10 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Chapter 2 – Land
Chapter 3 – Water
Chapter 4 – Atmosphere
Chapter 5 – Biodiversity
Chapter 6 – Human Settlements
Chapter 7 – Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Heritage
Chapter 8 – Council Environmental Performance
SNAPSHOT
At the beginning of Chapters 2-8 a summary page entitled “SNAPSHOT” has been
included, designed to provide a brief synopsis of the state, pressures, responses and
future directions for that core sector.
ADOPTED REPORTING MODEL
The Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model has been retained for reporting in the
2010/11 Supplementary SoE Report. The PSR Model was developed by the OECD and
has been adopted, with some variations, in national and most state SoE reporting
frameworks. The PSR model considers that human activities exert pressures on the
environment that affect its quality and the quantity of natural resources (State).
Society then responds to these changes through environmental, general economic and
sectoral policies, and through changes in awareness and behaviour or activities
(societal response).
Opportunities for Preparing Regional SoE Reports
During the 2010/11 reporting period Council attended a number of meetings regarding
Regional SoE Reporting under the new Integrated Planning and Reporting (IP & R)
requirements for NSW Local Government. The meeting participants were made up of a
number of Local and State Government representatives. A draft MOU has been
developed and twelve (12) North Coast Councils have agreed to a financial
commitment to pursue a regional reporting approach. The first regional report will be
prepared next year (2012). A Project Officer will be employed in March 2012 to collate
all data and prepare the regional report.
Two working groups representing the Mid North Coast and the North Coast have since
been established to review the current SoE reporting structure and implement changes
to achieve a regional reporting approach. A Regional set of indicators have been
developed and referred to all Local and State Government representatives for
comment. Feedback has been provided to the working groups for discussion at future
meetings.
Gaps in Data and Environmental Information
The majority of the data gaps and environmental information identified in the 2008/09
Comprehensive SoE Report have been addressed in subsequent Supplementary
Reports. There are, however, a few circumstances where data was not able to be
obtained, or gathered in time for this year‟s Supplementary SoE Report. Reasons for
this are stated in the relevant sections of the Report.
List of Issues and Future Actions
Refer to Table 1 in Chapter 1 – Towards Sustainability.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 11 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 1 TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This Chapter of the 2010/11 SoE Report was first introduced during the
Comprehensive SoE in 2003/04. Since then Council has made significant progress in
developing and implementing a number of strategies to assist the Shire moving
towards sustainability. The aim of this chapter is to provide an update on the progress
made towards sustainability in the Shire and also highlight priority areas that need
addressing in the future.
1.2 ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) aims to provide for the social and
economic needs of the community of Kempsey Shire, while protecting and enhancing
the essential natural life processes for the benefit of future generations. In short, ESD
is about taking into account environmental, social and economic considerations in
all decision making.
1.2.1 Kempsey Shire ESD Strategy
The Kempsey Shire ESD Strategy is a broad-scale sustainability plan designed to
facilitate sustainable development within the Shire. The Strategy was developed by
Council in close consultation with a community based steering committee. It provides
a vision for a sustainable future and key goals to work towards, based on community
values identified by the steering committee and confirmed by a comprehensive
community consultation process. Focused on triple bottom line principles, the Strategy
has been designed to serve as an educational resource and reference point for the
development of other plans and policies to ensure Council is working with the
community towards a sustainable future.
Where is the Strategy up to?
Adopted in July 2007, the Strategy proposes actions over a five year planning horizon
with a number of actions requiring implementation within each of those five years.
Implementation of high priority projects commenced immediately following Council‟s
adoption of the Strategy in July 2007. Since then implementation of a number of high
priority actions have commenced and continued and in some cases have been
completed in line with the Strategy‟s recommendations. The following actions have
been implemented during the 2010/11 reporting period.
Estuary Management Study completed;
The Data Compilation and Estuary Processes Studies have been completed. The
Estuary Management Study is currently with the Minister for completion;
Draft of the additional Ecological Study required as part of the Macleay Estuary
Management Plan completed;
Implementation of the Korogoro Creek Estuary Management Plan commenced;
Draft Cultural Plan completed, awaiting approval to exhibit;
Final Climate Change Risk Assessment Report and Adaptation Strategy completed;
Continuation of the capacity building project targeting best soil management
practices on the coastal floodplain;
Actions of the Bypass Strategy are currently being implemented;
Draft of the new Standard LEP nearing completion;
Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management has been adopted and currently being
implemented;
Implementation of the Gills Bridge Creek Rehabilitation Plan;
Implementation of Saltwater Creek and Killick Creek Estuary Management Plans;
and
Water saving activities at caravan parks and Councils reserves.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 12 - Printed on Recycled Paper
During early 2011 Council developed a Delivery Program (2011-2015) and Operational
Plan (2011-2012) which incorporated the priority actions of the ESD Strategy which
are to be implemented. The Delivery Program and Operational Plan began
implementation in July 2011.
1.3 TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE REPORTING
Kempsey Shire Council has adopted a Triple Bottom Line (i.e. Environmental, Social
and Economic) reporting template for all business paper reports. The aim of the
template is to ensure that social, economic and environmental implications of
recommendations are duly addressed to enable informed decision making for
sustainable outcomes.
1.4 INDICATORS
This report will continue to use similar environmental indicators consistent with
previous SoE Reports. These indicators include physical, chemical, biological and socio-
economic measures of the natural or built environment in order to assess natural
resources or environmental quality.
The indicators are presented with an explanation as to why they have been chosen and
what they demonstrate. A basic conclusion regarding the current state of the indicator
is also included in the format provided below.
1.5 PRIORITY ISSUES
The following table draws together specific issues and associated actions identified in
the remaining chapters of this report. It also lists future actions for priority inclusion
into the Delivery Program, Operational Plan and future management plans.
Conclusion: Situation Improving Steady
Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 13 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Table 1 - Summary of Issues and Current and Future Actions
Issue Current Actions (10/11) Future Actions
LAND
Land Degradation (Acid Sulfate Soils, Erosion, Contamination)
Completion of 3 drain modifications on the floodplain to encourage wet pasture growth as well as enhance and remediate the surrounding acid sulfate soils, backswamp and wetland environment.
The former Shell fuel terminal site at SWR has been remediated and a DCP and Development Application have been submitted to Council for the development of the site.
The Standard LEP is scheduled for completion in July 2012.
Continue remedial works on floodgates and drainage structures.
Strategic Planning Projects. Undertake land degradation
assessment.
Land Use Planning & Development
Residential Land Release Component of Local Growth Management Strategy Completed.
Rural Residential Land Capacity Report Completed.
Rural Residential Component of Local Growth Management Strategy.
Work continued on various South Kempsey Industrial Land rezoning projects.
Slim Dusty Centre is under construction.
A draft of the Standard LEP is with the Department for their consideration of the issuing of a section 65 certificate.
Work continued on the ecological investigations into the rezoning of areas in the Spencerville to New Entrance areas.
The RTA continued construction of the Kempsey Bypass.
Council has prepared and adopted a Bypass Strategy, and has made a position of Bypass Strategy Coordinator within Council to implement actions within the strategy.
Continue work on South Kempsey Industrial Land rezoning projects.
Finalise ecological investigations required for rezoning of land in the Spencerville to New Entrance area.
Standard LEP to be finalised. Continue work on key
strategies required for the development of the SWR Structure Plan.
Work on Macleay Valley Coast
Vision 2030 Project to continue where priorities allow.
Implementation of Actions within the Bypass Strategy.
Preparation of Comprehensive Development Control Plan.
Preparation of new Development Control Plans to accompany changes arising from the STD LEP.
Work on Kempsey Flood Study. Various Contributions Plans as
needed for South Kempsey, Crescent Head.
WATER
Water Quality
Beachwatch and stream water quality monitoring programs continued.
Investigation report submitted for (Pollution Reduction Program) on all seven STP‟s (West Kempsey, South Kempsey, Crescent Head, Gladstone, Hat Head, South West Rocks, Frederickton) analysis of overflow risks within the sewerage reticulation system.
Undertaking inspections in line with the On-site Sewage
Continue Beachwatch and stream water quality monitoring programs.
Implement actions outlined in Kempsey Shire Urban Stormwater Management Strategy.
Commence works to limit the overflow risks within the sewerage reticulation system, monitor and report on sewage overflows within the sewerage reticulation system.
Continue inspections in line with the On-site Sewage
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 14 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Management Strategy. Management Strategy.
Estuarine/Riverine
Health
Korogoro Estuary Management Plan is being implemented.
Macleay River data compilation and estuary process studies completed.
Continued planning of future works for continuation of improvements of the Gills Bridge Creek riparian corridor.
Continue to seek funding for implementation of high priority actions recommended in Killick Creek and Saltwater Creek and Lagoon Estuary Management Plans.
Continue implementation of high priority actions listed in the Korogoro Creek Estuary Management Plan.
Implement priority actions of the Macleay River Estuary Management Plan.
Continue on-ground rehabilitation works associated with Gills Bridge Creek riparian corridor.
Flooding Prepare Kempsey Flood Study. Review of Council‟s Flood
Policy.
Floodplain Risk Management Plan.
Riparian Vegetation
Revegetation works completed for the Nestle Community Vegetation Project at Jerseyville & Smithtown.
Boyters Lane Wetland & Riparian Rehabilitation has
been completed – see Ch. 3 for further details.
The 3 year Environmental Trust Funded Gills Bridge Creek Rehabilitation Project was completed and planning for the next stage of rehabilitation works is currently being undertaken for the Gills Bridge Creek riparian corridor.
Continue Gills Bridge Creek riparian corridor rehabilitation works.
ATMOSPHERE
Air Pollution Responded to air pollution
complaints.
Develop & Implement Air Pollution Complaint Register.
Odour
Ongoing odour management at Sewerage Treatment Plants.
Responding to various odour complaints.
Develop effective Odour Complaint Register and Prepare Action Plans for Problem Areas.
Greenhouse Gases & Climate
Change
Completed the first 2 strategic milestone projects of the Cities for Climate Protection Program. However, no further funding was made available from the Federal Government.
Installed energy efficient lighting & air conditioning within Council premises.
Commence work on a greenhouse gas reduction strategy for Council and the Shire‟s Community.
Implement actions from the Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Shire.
BIODIVERSITY
Endangered and/or Vulnerable Flora and Fauna
Work completed on detailed Koala Study.
Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management approved by the Department of Planning and commenced implementation of the plan in May 2011.
Continue implementation of the Comprehensive Koala Plan and implement management action of the plan.
Prepare Biodiversity Conservation Strategy once funding becomes available.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 15 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Feral Animals and Exotic Weeds
Work continued on Council‟s ongoing weed control and education program.
Review of Companion Animal Management Plan completed.
LHPA responded to complaints and assisting property owners with feral animal control.
Continue work on Weed Control Program.
Implement high priority actions of the reviewed Companion Animal Management Plan.
LHPA monitoring, trapping & baiting feral animals. Develop further control plans.
HUMAN SETTLEMENTS
Population Growth
Population Projection Study and Draft Residential Land Release Strategy adopted.
Work underway on other Land Use Planning Projects (refer to those actions listed under „Land‟).
Commence Kempsey Shire Vision 2030.
Finalise Residential Land Release Strategy with DoP.
Water & Sewerage
Multi-year investigation into Macleay Coastal Sands aquifers.
Construction completed on the water treatment plant at Bellbrook.
Improvements to monitoring system at Stuart McIntyre Dam.
Reclaimed water use. Nutrient Monitoring Regime. Water Sharing Plans.
Aquifer investigations will conclude by the end of 2011.
Bellbrook Water Treatment Plant has been commissioned and has been in operation since late 2010.
Crescent Head - Inline pre-filtering and storage has been scoped and budgeted to replace the hypalon storage dam at Crescent Head.
Kempsey - Better management of the borefield land for the Kempsey scheme is being designed to enable the improved protection of the bores in Sherwood.
Waste
„Green Waste‟ kerbside collection service.
Conducted community education programs.
Development of the Crescent Head Road Waste Management Centre.
Continued implementation of Kerbside Recycling Program and further recycling initiatives.
Continue to minimise waste to landfill.
Continue community discussions and education programs.
Investigations to determine future strategies for development of the Waste Transfer Stations at Bellbrook, South West Rocks and Stuarts Point are continuing.
Roads
Roads Asset Management Plan has been developed and adopted.
Rural Roads Contribution Plan was superseded by Local Roads and Traffic Infrastructure Developer Contribution Plan 2009 which commenced in January 2010.
Ongoing Works Plan.
Council continues to develop
Asset Management Plans for key assets such as Roads, Bridges and Boatramps.
Pacific Highway Bypass Strategy adoption.
ABORIGINAL & NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE
Encroachment by Development
Kempsey Shire Community Based Heritage Study completed.
Aboriginal heritage sites protected by National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974).
Implement the Kempsey Shire Community Based Heritage Study.
Complete Heritage Development Control Plan.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 16 - Printed on Recycled Paper
COUNCIL PERFORMANCE
Energy Consumption
Electricity Consumption Service Reports produced for all Council buildings and facilities.
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Goal set for Council.
Investigate options for improved efficiencies and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Develop Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan.
Water Consumption
Water saving activities and usage reports.
Ongoing assessment of water usage and efficiencies with continued investigations to assess options for reducing water consumption.
Consumption of Materials
Paper usage monitoring. Commitment to Sustainable
Choice Program.
Continue paper monitoring program & investigate alternative environmentally friendly paper.
Continue to participate in Sustainable Choice Program.
Fuel Consumption Greenhouse gas emissions
calculated for entire vehicle fleet.
Investigate options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including purchasing smaller, fuel efficient vehicles with improved emission ratings for Council‟s Vehicle Fleet, based on NSW Clean Car Benchmarks.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 17 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 2 LAND
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Geology & Soils - Three major bedrock substrates; metasediments; granitoids and basalt underlay the majority of the Macleay River Catchment. Floodplain and
estuary sediments also occur. Many of the soils derived from these substrates have moderate to high erodibility.
Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) – The lower Macleay floodplain is one of the most significant areas affected by ASS in NSW.
Contaminated Land – There are a number of known potentially contaminated sites and Unhealthy Building Land in the Kempsey Shire including, but not limited to: landfills, fuel depots, stock dips, sewer treatment plants, quarries and mine sites.
Soil Erosion –resulting from continued land clearing for development and agriculture.
Acid Sulfate Soils Assessment – 11,275ha of low risk ASS and
47,556ha of high risk ASS occur in the Shire. There is 364km of drains within the floodplain.
Agricultural Practices – can place increased pressure on land through the use of chemical sprays, drainage of land, land clearing and inappropriate stock and crop management.
Land Contamination – Land contamination usually refers to those parcels of land that retains contamination residues resulting from a previous use, ranging from building materials to the chemical by-products of former industrial or agricultural activity.
Acid Sulfate Soils Management
Remedial works undertaken during the 2010/11 reporting period using external and internal funding.
Contaminated Site Management – Preparation of draft Groundwater Management Plan for the former Caltex fuel terminal sites. The Plan aims to set in place procedures to restrict access to potential contaminated groundwater in the vicinity of the plume and ensure appropriate management of the plume well into the future.
Contaminated Site Remediation – A Development Application to rehabilitate land on the former Shell fuel terminal site, which is a precondition to any development of the land, was approved by Council and works have been carried out to remediate the site. A groundwater Management Plan, Site Auditor Report, Remediation and Validation Report, Soil and Groundwater
Health Risk Assessment Report have been carried out.
Acid Sulfate Soils – investigate future floodplain projects in accordance with Macleay River EMP.
Mapping of Groundwater Plumes - Compile relevant information from Groundwater Management once finalised and present on Council’s website.
Land Degradation Assessment – A land degradation assessment is needed to effectively manage this issue.
Land Use – No major change in
land use zoning has occurred during the past 12 months. However, a comparison between Kempsey LEP 1987 and the proposed new standard LEP being prepared under the
Development Pressure – there
was a decrease in both the number of development approvals and value during 10/11. Development approvals peaked in 2003/04 towards the end of the housing market boom, with both the value and
Compliance Register – Set up to provide a measurement of the number
and types of non-compliances and development conducted without consent.
Land Capacity Reports - The Land Capacity Report has been broken into 2 main components – urban land capacity and rural land capacity to examine the amount of both available residential and rural zoned land and the capacity to house projected population. The Urban Land Capacity report has been completed. The rural residential land capacity report has also been
Standard LEP - Finalise and adopt LEP.
Review of South West Rocks Structure Plan - Continue work on key strategies required for the development of a Structure Plan.
Kempsey Town Centre Master Plan Review - Council is undertaking a comprehensive review of relevant documents in order to achieve improved urban design outcomes for the public realm within the Town Centre. This is now likely to be incorporated into the actions of the Bypass Strategy.
Macleay Valley Coast Vision 2030 - Council will be progressing this project over the
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 18 - Printed on Recycled Paper
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
standard template showed a substantial increase in the area of land zoned as National Parks and Reserves. Waterways are now also proposed to have their own zone under the Standard LEP.
number of approvals tapering off during the past 6-7 years.
completed.
Residential Land Release Strategy (Local Growth Management Strategy – Residential Component) - This project is required to ensure that an adequate supply of land is maintained to support the expansion of the Shire‟s towns and villages and to accurately determine the expected future population limits on which the planning for infrastructure will rely. The DoP have approved the strategy with some exclusions.
Standard LEP - A draft of the Standard LEP is with the Department for their consideration of the issuing of a section 65 certificate.
Saltwater (SWR) LEP - A DCP for the site has been prepared and has been adopted by Council.
Former Shell Terminal Site (SWR) LEP – A DCP has been prepared for the site and submitted to Council for consideration.
Slim Dusty Museum – Work has commenced on constructing the Slim Dusty Centre.
Industrial Land Review Implementation -
South Kempsey - Work has continued into the rezoning of land to the east of the Pacific Highway in South Kempsey. A LES was prepared detailing the expected environmental impacts and ameliorative actions required for the proposal to go ahead. The LEP was made in September 2009. A DCP has been prepared for the site and is being considered by Council.
A request has been received to rezone land at West Street, South Kempsey
from Residential to Light Industrial. A Draft LEP has been prepared and exhibited. The LEP has now been made.
Frederickton - It is anticipated that preliminary investigations into rezoning of land for industrial purposes will commence following completion of the Standard LEP.
Spencerville to New Entrance Investigation - This land has been identified for long term release in Council‟s 1997 Residential Land Release Strategy. The ecological assessment confirms that the area contains habitat of high biodiversity which is likely to constrain future expansion of SWR.
Kempsey Town Centre Master Plan Review - Council is currently working on a comprehensive review of the Town Centre Master Plan. Upgrading of CDB designs and other matters are now
coming year and seeking advice and input from relevant professionals and the broader community. This project has been reprioritised due to the Bypass Strategy Implementation.
Rural Residential Land Release Component of the Kempsey Local Growth Management Strategy – This document is being prepared and will be completed in 2012.
Bypass Strategy Implementation – Implementation of the actions within the Bypass Strategy. Projects to be undertaken over a three to 4 year timeframe.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 19 - Printed on Recycled Paper
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
being considered under the Bypass Strategy.
Macleay Valley Coast Vision 2030 - This project will result in an overarching strategy incorporating Council‟s vision for development within the Shire for the next 20 years. This has been reprioritised as a consequence of the Bypass Strategy.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 20 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The land is a fundamental part of ecological systems and is essential to sustaining
human existence. For the purposes of this document land refers to the geographical
surface area of the Kempsey Shire, including the interaction between its soils and
geology, waterways, biological processes and its use for human settlement.
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability that are affecting the Land?
2.2 TOPOGRAPHY
The Kempsey Shire contains varied topography. The most western portions of the
Shire make up part of the rolling hills of the New England Tablelands ranging between
900-1200m in elevation. The land drops steeply from the tablelands over the rugged
gorge and steep hill country and continues to fall until it levels out into lower hill
country around 35km upstream of Kempsey. The remainder of the Shire encompasses
lower hill country as well as the coastal floodplain and estuary (Ashley et. all., 2007).
The coastal fringe is characterised by dunefields
and some elevated headlands.
Plate 1: Lower Hill Country (left) and coastal floodplain (above) within the Kempsey Shire
2.3 GEOLOGY
The recently completed Macleay River Estuary Process Study provides a summary of
the geology occurring within the broader Macleay River Catchment. The majority of
the Kempsey Shire LGA falls within this catchment and so the geological descriptions
provided below are representative of the geological conditions occurring within the
Kempsey Shire.
There are three major bedrock substrates - metasediments, granitoids and basalt
underlying the majority of the Macleay River Catchment. Deposits of floodplain and
estuary sediments also occur within the floodplain environment of the lower Macleay.
Metasediments is the term used to group the partially metamorphosed sedimentary
rocks of Devonian and Permian periods. They are predominantly metamorphosed
marine sediments such as mudstones and greywacke with a quartz and felspar
composition. Intrusions of granitic rocks of Carboniferous to Triassic occur within
these metasediments. The intrusions have high quartz and felspar content with small
amounts of mica. They are also associated with mineral deposits of gold (Au), copper
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 21 - Printed on Recycled Paper
(Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), silver (Ag), antimony (Sb), selenium (Sa) and molybdenum
(Mo). Tertiary age basaltic volcanics and minor sedimentary rocks occupy the
remainder of the area.
The widespread metasediment substrate of the Macleay catchment typically gives rise
to quatsofelspar lithic gravel deposits in the tableland streams and cobbles and
boulders in the gorge country. Finer sediment fractions tend to dominate in the lower
reaches of streams along the trunk Macleay valley. The sand to silty fraction of these
sediments is dominated by quartz and felspar grains and lithic material.
Downstream of Kempsey, the materials constituting the floodplains are mostly
unconsolidated sand-silt-muds, but gravels are more prevalent upstream. Silt-
dominated levees occur along the Macleay and these may be bordered by muddy to
organic-rich backswamp regions. However, these fluvial and swamp deposits overlay
earlier estuarine deposits and display evidence for prograding of the floodplain-estuary
system since the Pleistocene. The present estuary and coastal regions display
interactions between Pleistocene to recent barrier beach deposits, estuarine sand-silt-
mud and saline to brackish wetland areas.
For a more detailed description of the geology of the Kempsey Shire and broader
Macleay River Catchment refer to Ashley and Graham (2001).
2.4 SOILS
Soil landscapes describe the soils as well as the topography, land use and vegetation
of an area. They provide information on characteristics such as erodibility,
permeability, acid potential and fertility. These characteristics are important factors
when examining catchment sediment loads, and when formulating and considering
catchment management/estuary management strategies.
A review of the Kempsey-Korogoro Point and Macksville-Nambucca soil landscape
maps, show that the lower Macleay is dominated by three soil landscape groupings -
Alluvial, Residual and Swamp. Each of these soil landscapes is described in more
detail below:
Alluvial – (e.g. mr, gd, ae), were formed along the Macleay and Belmore Rivers and
Kinchela and Clybucca Creeks as alluvial delta/levee formations by the deposition of
sediment transported down the valley by rivers and streams. The soils are usually
deep and contain stratified sediments ranging from gravels and clay. The alluvial soils
tend to have high erodibility, low wet bearing strength, low cohesion and high acid
sulfate potential.
Residual – (e.g. kg), are sites where deep soils have formed from in-situ weathering
of parent materials. Residual soil landscapes typically have level to undulating elevated
topography. Stream channels are usually poorly defined and streams do not transport
sediment out of the landscape. Residual soils tend to have high erodibility and acidity,
low wet bearing strength and low fertility.
Swamp – (e.g. se, bl), are dominated by ground surfaces and soils which are at least
seasonally waterlogged. Soil parent material includes large amounts of accumulated
decayed organic matter. Watertables are frequently close to the surface. Landform
elements include swamps, abandoned channels, and some lagoons. The swamp soils
tend to have low wet bearing strength, low permeability, poor drainage, high
aluminium toxicity potential and high to extreme acid sulfate potential.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 22 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Source: WMA Water & Southern Cross University (2009)
Figure 1 – Soil Landscapes of the Lower Macleay
The mid valley and gorge country predominantly consists of Colluvial and Erosional soil
landscapes. The soil and erosional characteristics of these groupings are summarised
as follows:
Colluvial (sn, we, br, di and mk), are areas of mass movement although erosional
processes may be dominant. Soil parent material includes landslide, mudflow and
creek deposits. Soil depth is variable. Colluvial soil landscapes usually include cliffs,
scarps, landslides and may include areas of rock outcrop. Colluvial landscapes in the
Upper Valley tend to have very steep slopes, shallow soils, moderate to extreme
erodibility, low fertility and low available water holding capacity.
Erosional (eu, co, fb, rk and pn), are formed by the erosive action of running water
on hill slopes. Streams are well defined and transport their sediment load out of the
landscape. Soil depth is usually shallow, and may be either absent, derived from
water-washed parent materials or derived from in-situ weathered bedrock. Erosional
soil landscapes in the Mid-Valley consist of steep to undulating slopes and rock
outcrops. Erosional soils are stoney, have moderate to high erodibility, low fertility, low to moderate permeability.
2.5 REGIONAL SETTING
The Kempsey Shire Local Government Area (LGA) is located on the Mid-North Coast of
NSW, approximately 450km north of Sydney and 550km south of Brisbane (Refer to
Figure 2 below). Kempsey Shire covers a geographical area of approximately
3,376km2 and is bounded by the Nambucca Shire to the north, Port Macquarie-
Hat Head
South West Rocks
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 23 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Hastings Shire to the south and the Walcha and Armidale-Dumaresq Shires to the
west.
Figure 2 - Regional Setting
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 24 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.6 VEGETATION
The Shire has a significant amount and wide range of vegetative cover due to the large
areas of National Parks and State Forests. Vegetation types within the Kempsey Shire
LGA are discussed in detail in Chapter 5 – Biodiversity.
2.7 ACID SULFATE SOILS
Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) are natural soils that form in seawater or brackish water
environments. They are common in every estuary and estuarine floodplain in NSW.
These soils contain iron sulfides that are stable and do not cause a problem when
waterlogged. However, when these natural occurring sulfides are disturbed and
exposed to air, oxidation occurs and sulfuric acid is ultimately produced. This acid can
leach into the surrounding area acidifying neighbouring drains, wetlands, creeks,
estuaries and bays, causing severe short and long-term environmental damage. It can
affect industries such as fishing and tourism, and can impact on public and private
infrastructure by causing serious damage to steel and concrete structures such as the
foundations (footings) of a building, floodgate structures or bridge pillars (LMCC 2005).
Indicator – The Extent and Location of Acid Sulfate Soils
Why use this indicator?
The area and extent of potential ASS is not expected to change. However, it is
important to identify the presence of potential ASS to ensure any proposed future
development does not have the potential to cause acid generation and runoff. Figure 3
below shows the area and extent of potential ASS in the Kempsey Shire.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 25 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Figure 3 – The Area and Extent of Acid Sulfate Soils
What does this show?
There are approximately 11,275ha (3.34% of Kempsey Shire) of low risk ASS and
approximately 47,456ha (14.06% of Kempsey Shire) of High Risk ASS.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 26 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.8 LAND USE
Indicator – Land Use Zoning
Why use this indicator?
Varying land uses will have differing impacts on the natural environment. Due to the
difficulty in accurately identifying actual land usage, land use zoning is used as a
measure of allowable potential land uses. The Kempsey LEP 1987 as amended is the
current Land Use Zoning Plan in operation across the Kempsey Shire. However, it is
currently under review to bring it in line with the Standard LEP.
Table 2 below provides a comparison of the land use zonings between what will
become the new Kempsey LEP (under the provisions of the standard instrument) and
that currently listed in Kempsey LEP 1987. Please note the below figures are based on
a working draft of the new Standard LEP and have not yet been finalised and as such
are subject to change.
Table 2 - Comparison between Proposed Standard LEP and KLEP 1987
Standard Instrument Zone
Approx. Zoned Area (ha)
Equivalent Zone in KLEP 1987
Approx. Zoned Area (ha)
R1 – General Residential
752 Zone No. 2 (a)(Residential “A” Zone)
698.5
R3 – Medium Density Residential
167 Zone No. 2 (b1)(Residential “B1”
Zone), Zone No. 2 (b2) (Residential “B2” Zone) and 2(C) (Residential “C” Zone), 2(D) (Residential (Tourist Facility) “D” Zone)
2(b1) – 130.8 2(b2) – 5.92
2( c ) – 16.5 2(d) – 5.19
R5 – Large Lot Residential
2,961 1( c ) (Rural Small Holdings “C” Zone)
2, 976
RU1 – Primary Production Zone
50,710 Zone No. 1 (a3)(Rural “A3” Agriculture Protection Zone)
Zone No. 1 (e)(Rural (Floodway) “E” Zone
1(a3) – 38,830 (note add 440 ha) 1( e ) - 348.8
RU2 – Rural Landscape Zone
147,600 Zone No. 1 (a1)(Rural “A1” Zone); Zone No. 1 (d)(Rural Investigation) “D” Zone)
182,100
RU3 - Forestry Zone 21,880 Zone No. 1 (f)(Rural (Forestry) “F” Zone)
72,820
RU4 – Rural Small Holdings Zone
3,472 Zone No. 1 (g) (Rural (Small Agricultural
Enterprises)
3,472
RU5 - Village Zone 667.4 Zone No. 2 (v)(Village or Township Zone)
676.4
B1 - Neighbourhood
Centre Zone
3.8 Zone No. 3(b) (Business
(Neighbourhood) “B”
Zone)
1.26
B2 – Local Centre 10.4 Zone No. 3(a) (Business (General) “A” Zone), Zone No. 3(v) (Business
(Village) “V” Zone), Zone No. 3(b) (Business (Neighbourhood) “B” Zone)
3(a) – 34.8 3(b) – 1.3 3(c ) - 81
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 27 - Printed on Recycled Paper
B3 – Commercial Core 43.42 Zone No. 3(a) (Business (General) “A” Zone)
34.8
B6 - Enterprise Corridor
52.05 Zone No. 3(c) (Business (Special) “C” Zone)
81
IN1 - General Industrial Zone
214.7 Zone No. 4(a) (Industrial (General) Zone), Zone No. 4(e) (Industrial
(Extractive) “E” Zone)
124.3
IN2 - Light Industrial Zone
7.8 Zone No. 4(b) (Light Industrial “B” Zone)
7.66
SP1 – Special Activities
49.61 Zone No. 5(a) (Special Uses “A” Zone)
159.7
SP2 - Infrastructure Zone
879.7 Zone No. 5(a) (Special Uses “A” Zone) Zone No. 5(b) (Special Uses “B” Zone)
5(a) 159.7 5(b) 233.5
SP3 - Tourist Zone 13.47 No conversion – on one site proposed for the Shire.
RE1 - Public Recreation Zone
480.6 Zone No. 6(a) (open Space “A” Zone)
566.1
RE2 - Private Recreation Zone
88.29 Zone No. 6(b) (Open Space “B” Zone)
88.34
E1 - National Parks and Reserves
95,220 Zone No. 8(a) (Existing National Parks, Nature Reserves and Land
Available for Recreation Zone)
8 (a ) - 17,540 8 (b) – 3,575
E2 - Environmental Conservation
869.6 Zone No. 7(a) (Wetlands Protection Zone) Zone No. 7(b) (Environmental Protection
(Habitat) Zone)
7(a) – 44.94 7(b) – 65.37
E3 - Environmental Management
5,588 Zone No. 7(d) (Scenic Protection Zone)
Zone No. 7(f1) (Coastal
Lands Protection Zone), Zone No. 7(h) (Historic Lands Protection Zone)
7(d) – 10,050 7(f1) – 1,915
7(f2) – 95.26
7(h) – 50.34
W1 - Natural Waterways
4,893 None Zero
W2 - Recreational Waterways
1,536 None Zero
Note: No equivalent zone in Standard LEP for Zone No. 7(f2) (Coastal Lands Acquisition Zone); Zone No. 8(b) (Proposed National Park Extension Zone) listed in KLEP 1987.
What does this show?
The above table shows that there will be a substantial increase in the area of land
zoned as National Parks and Reserves when comparing that originally zoned in KLEP
1987 and the proposed new Standard LEP. Waterways are now also proposed to have
their own zone under the Standard LEP with a corresponding reduction in the area
zoned for forestry purposes.
2.8.1 Urban Settlement
The ABS produces estimates of the resident population of Local Government Areas
(LGAs) and States and Territories. Estimated resident populations (ERPs) are official
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 28 - Printed on Recycled Paper
estimates of the Australian population, which link people to a place of usual residence
within Australia. Table 3 below shows the estimated resident population for each
urban centre in the Shire based on 2006 Census results.
Table 3 - Estimated Resident Population of Kempsey Shire Urban Localities
Locality ERP
Kempsey 8,434
South West Rocks 4,521
Crescent Head 1,114
Frederickton 1,021
Gladstone / Smithtown 994
Stuarts Point 750
Hat Head 309
Total Urban 17,144
A further 11,246 people reside in rural and rural residential areas within the Shire.
2.8.2 Industrial Use
Industrial land use is predominately based in the industrial estates of Kempsey and
South West Rocks. However, significant industrial operations are also located in
Smithtown and Frederickton. There are also a number of quarries and sand mines
located in the Kempsey LGA.
2.8.3 Primary Industry
There are considerable primary industry operations on the North Coast of NSW. The
farm gate value of primary production on the North Coast is in excess of $1 billion per
annum, while mineral production on the North Coast is nearly $30 billion per annum.
Approximately 1 in 8 people working on the North Coast are employed in primary
production.
The main primary industries in the Kempsey Shire LGA include:
• Beef
• Dairy
• Nurseries
• Fruit
• Vegetables
• Honey and beeswax
• Pork
• Hay
• Pastures and grasses
• Extractive
• Forestry and logging
2.8.4 Open Spaces
The mild climate of the Macleay Valley lends
itself to outdoor social and sporting activities.
A growing population will therefore increase the need
for open space areas tailored to suit such pursuits.
Plate 2: Riverside Park in Kempsey
Source: Kempsey Shire Council (2009)
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 29 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.9 CONTAMINATED LAND
Indicator – Contaminated Sites
Why use this indicator?
Depending on their location and extent, contaminated sites can pose a significant risk
of harm to human health and the environment and as such it is essential these sites
are identified and managed accordingly.
Information about sites where regulatory action involving the NSW EPA has been taken
is compiled on a database kept by the Authority. These sites fall into three categories:
Sites regulated under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997;
Sites which are, or were formerly, the subject of notices issued under sections
35 and 36 of the Environmentally Hazardous Chemicals Act 1985; and
Land declared to be unhealthy building land, or being investigated for
declaration, under the Unhealthy Building Land Act 1990.
Council is also required to identify contaminated lands under Section 79C of the
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Cattle tick dip sites (both current and former) are also a source of potential land
contamination. Cattle ticks present a multimillion dollar threat to the beef and dairy
industries in New South Wales and since the early 1900s ticks have been controlled by
an eradication program. As part of that program more than 1,600 cattle tick dips have
been built in north eastern New South Wales and along the Queensland border. The
first chemical used in these dips was arsenic and that was replaced in 1955 by the
organochloride pesticide DDT. In 1962 DDT was phased out but, as both of these
chemicals are very persistent in the environment, residues of both tickicides remain at
most sites. In May 1991, as a result of fears about contamination held by the public
and the Government, the Government announced the formation of the cattle tick dip
site management committee, known as Dipmac, to provide long-term solutions for
cattle dip site contamination. NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) website
has a list of known current and former cattle tick dip sites, as shown in the table
below:
Table 4 – Number of Known Current and Former Cattle Tick Dip Sites in the Kempsey Shire
Dip Name
AGD66 AMG EASTING
AGD66 AMG NORTHING Status Locality
CORANGULA 469250 6570630 CLOSED CORANGULA ROAD KEMPSEY
FACTORY 471300 6568310 DECOMMISSIONED MAINEYS ROAD KEMPSEY
KEMPSEY SALEYARDS 484430 6564560 DECOMMISSIONED KEMP STREET KEMPSEY
MOUNT SKILLION 473130 6569460 DEMOLISHED
TRACK OFF ARMIDALE ROAD KEMPSEY
What does this show?
A search of the NSW DECCW (incorporating former EPA functions) contaminated land
records revealed that there are still no sites formally listed under section 58 of the
Contaminated Land Management Act 1997.
Table 4 shows a total of four cattle tick dip sites located within the Kempsey Shire.
None of the sites are currently in operation. These four sites have been known for
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 30 - Printed on Recycled Paper
sometime now with no new sites being identified since the last Comprehensive Report
in 2003/04.
It should also be noted there are a number of other known potentially contaminated
sites and Unhealthy Building Land in the Kempsey Shire including, but not limited to:
landfills, fuel depots, sewer treatment plants, quarries and mine sites.
PRESSURES
Why is it happening?
2.10 DEVELOPMENT PRESSURES
Development pressures impact on all aspects of the environment. As populations grow
the demand for land and water resources and infrastructure subsequently increases.
The growth of human settlement (e.g. via subdivision of land) often displaces other
land uses such as native vegetation, open space or valuable agricultural land.
Construction and building place pressure on mineral resources, whilst increasing the
potential for degradation of soils though poor management practices. Growing
communities also increase the output of wastes, placing pressure on water resources
and sanitation systems.
Indicator – Development Applications
Why use this indicator?
This indicator provides a measure of the pressures of development within the Kempsey
LGA.
Figure 4 – Number and Value of Development Applications
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 31 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
This indicator demonstrates there was a decrease in both the number of development
approvals and value during the last 12 months. Development approvals peaked in
2003/04 towards the end of the housing market boom, with both the value and
number of approvals tapering off during the past 6 - 7 years.
2.11 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND
As well as those lands zoned as National Parks and Reserves, there is also some
12,221ha of land zoned 7(a, b, d, f1, f2 and h) Protection Zones. Land included in this
zoning includes wetlands, habitat, scenic protection, coastal lands and historic lands.
Development in these zonings is restricted to ensure that any proposed developments
do not impact on these sensitive environments.
2.12 LAND CLEARING
Indicator – Land Clearing
Detailed in Section 5.7 – Land Clearing and Development of Chapter 5 – Biodiversity.
2.13 RURAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Indicator – Rural Residential Development Rates
Why use this indicator?
Rural residential development (small rural acreages) is listed as a regional indicator.
Under Kempsey LEP 1987, zones 1(c) and 1 (g) allow for rural residential
development.
Council subdivision approvals for rural residential development (Zoned 1(c) and 1(g)
only) during the 2010/11 reporting period, showed 16 lots were approved for
subdivision from an existing six lots, resulting in the potential net creation of 10
additional lots in the future. A dwelling entitlement was also created on an existing lot
which previously did not have entitlement. This compares to the approval of 28 lots
from an existing four lots, resulting in a potential net increase of 11 additional lots
during the previous reporting period.
The information presented above represents Council approval of subdivisions. This
does not necessarily mean the approval has been acted upon and the lots have
actually been created. In this regard, there were seven subdivisions officially
registered through Land Property Information resulting in an additional 36 lots being
actually created during the 2010/11 reporting period.
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 32 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
The data for 2010/11 reporting period indicated that approvals have been granted to
transform rural land into a greater number of smaller rural acreages with the potential
to further modify and fragment habitats.
2.14 LAND DEGRADATION
Land degradation is the decline in the condition or quality of land as a result of its use
by individuals or society. Some common forms of land degradation include: soil
erosion, rising water tables, invasion of introduced and feral species, declining soil
fertility due to acidification or salinisation, Acid Sulfate Soils and land contamination.
The full extent or nature of land degradation in the Kempsey Shire LGA is still yet to be
fully quantified.
2.14.1 Soil Erosion
Soil erosion is the wearing away of soil due to wind, rain and related natural forces
that carry surface soil down slope toward streams and on into rivers and eventually
bays and the oceans. Under natural conditions, this is generally a very slow process,
particularly when vegetation coverage is in good condition. However, it is greatly
accelerated when vegetation is removed or replaced with less erosion resistant
vegetation such as grasses. Historically land clearing for timber resources and
agricultural practices in the Kempsey Shire has increased both actual soil erosion and
the potential for soil erosion. A comprehensive database detailing area and extent of
severe and moderate soil erosion sites in the Shire is yet to be undertaken.
2.14.2 Acid Sulfate Soils
Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) are the most significant land degradation issue in the Kempsey
Shire, which impact not only on land and agricultural production, but also on aquatic
systems and biodiversity.
Plate 3: Acid Sulfate Soil Scald on the Lower Macleay
The NSW Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS) Strategy identified two Stage 1 Acid Soil Hot Spots in
the Kempsey Shire area, Clybucca and Upper Maria River, and five Stage 2 Acid Soil
Hot Spots, Yarrahapinni, Belmore, Frogmore, Kinchela and Rafferty‟s. Hot Spot areas
are areas where land management decisions in relation to ASS have contributed to,
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Source Kempsey Shire Council (2005)
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 33 - Printed on Recycled Paper
and can lead to further, severe soil acidification, poor water quality, reduction in
agricultural productivity and capability, loss of estuarine habitat and/or degraded
vegetation and wildlife (Tulau et al 1999).
Within the floodplain areas in Kempsey Shire there is over 364km of drains, of which
94.5km is managed by Council and 52km is jointly managed between Council and
private landholders or drainage unions. Council also owns 173 floodgates within the
drainage system and there are an unknown number of privately owned floodgates.
2.14.3 Contaminated Land
Land contamination usually refers to those parcels of land that retains contamination
residues resulting from a previous use, ranging from building materials to the chemical
by-products of former industrial or agricultural activity. There are a number of known
potentially contaminated sites and Unhealthy Building Land in the Kempsey Shire
including, but not limited to: landfills, fuel depots, stock dips, sewer treatment plants,
quarries and mine sites. Further investigations are required to confirm the location
and extent of contamination at these sites.
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
2.15 STRATEGIC LAND USE PLANNING
Council regulates development in accordance with relevant legislation and the land
zoning in the Kempsey LEP. Council undertakes regular and periodic review of LEP‟s as
a requirement under Section 73 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
The Kempsey LEP 1987 is soon to be replaced, following State approval, with the
Standard LEP, which incorporates new planning controls and practices as part of the
review process. Other significant planning projects which have progressed throughout
the 2010/11 reporting period are outlined below.
2.15.1 Land Capacity Reports
The Land Capacity Report has been broken into two main components – urban land
capacity and rural land capacity to examine the amount of both available residential
and rural zoned land and the capacity to house projected population. The Urban Land
Capacity report has been completed. This report was used to prepare the Residential
Component of the Local Growth Management Strategy.
The Rural Residential Land Capacity report has also been prepared. This will be used
to prepare the Rural Residential Land Release component of the Kempsey Local Growth
Management Strategy.
2.15.2 Residential Land Release Strategy (Local Growth Management
Strategy – Residential Component)
This project is required to ensure that an adequate supply of land is maintained to
support the expansion of the Shire‟s towns and villages and to accurately determine
the expected future population limits on which the planning for infrastructure will rely.
The Urban Land Capacity and Population Projection reports previously completed form
the basis of the strategy.
The DoP has approved the Strategy with some exclusions.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 34 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.15.3 Standard LEP
The Standard LEP was provided to the DoP in July 2010 seeking a section 65
Certificate. The Standard LEP is scheduled for completion in July 2012.
2.15.4 Saltwater (SWR) LEP
A DCP for the site has been prepared and has been adopted by Council.
2.15.5 Former Shell Terminal Site (SWR) LEP
This LEP will permit the subdivision of approximately 50 lots, following rehabilitation of
the land to remove contaminated soil resulting from the previous use of the land to
store petroleum. A Development Application to rehabilitate the land, which is a
precondition to any development of the land, was approved and rehabilitation work has
commenced.
The draft LEP was placed on public exhibition between 4 November and 2 December
2008, including a public meeting. The results of public exhibition were reported to
Council in March 2009, whereby it was resolved to forward the draft LEP to the Minister
which was made in August 2009.
The LEP Amendment has been made. The Site has been remediated and a DCP and
Development Application has been submitted to Council for the development of the
site.
2.15.6 Slim Dusty Museum
Construction of the Slim Dusty Centre commenced during the 09/10 reporting period
and continued throughout the 2010/11 reporting period.
2.15.7 Industrial Land Review Implementation
South Kempsey
Work has continued into the rezoning of land to the east of the Pacific Highway in
South Kempsey. A LES has been prepared detailing the expected environmental
impacts and ameliorative actions required for the proposal to go ahead. The draft LEP
was made by the Minister in September 2009. A DCP has been prepared for the site
and is currently being considered by Council.
Work on an application to rezone land to the west of the Pacific Highway is progressing
with the preparation of environmental studies.
A request has been received to rezone land at West Street, South Kempsey from
Residential to Light Industrial. A consultant was appointed to undertake a preliminary
review of the proposal which was reported to Council in March 2009, whereby it was
resolved to proceed to prepare a draft LEP for the site. The Draft LEP has been
prepared and exhibited and Council resolved to send the plan to the DoP requesting
that the plan be made. The Plan has been made and the land has been rezoned.
Frederickton
Council‟s Industrial Land Review identifies the area bounded by Quarry Road and
Raymonds Lane north of Collombatti Road as being potentially suited to industrial
development and has been included as potential future employment lands under the
Mid North Coast Regional Strategy. It is anticipated that preliminary investigations will
commence following completion of the Standard LEP.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 35 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.15.8 Spencerville to New Entrance Investigation
This land has been identified for long term release in Council‟s 1997 Residential Land
Release Strategy. The site has been excluded from the Residential Component of the
Local Growth Management Strategy recently endorsed by the DoP.
A habitat assessment has been undertaken using vegetation mapping completed in
November 2005. A meeting was held with landowners and the DECCW to determine
options, whereby it was determined that a comprehensive ecological study in the
context of the relationship of the site to the broader SWR area was necessary. A
consultant was appointed to undertake a Landscape Ecology Specialist Study in
October 2007.
The ecological assessment confirms that the area contains habitat of high biodiversity
which is likely to constrain future expansion of SWR.
Council is currently processing a rezoning application for land within this area, which
will result in more site specific assessments of the ecological constraints.
2.15.9 Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management
The project is required in order to satisfy the requirements of State Environmental
Planning Policy (SEPP) 44 and provide for the protection of vegetation required to
support viable breeding colonies of koalas that exist across the Shire.
The DoP have endorsed the Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management and Council has
commenced implementation of the plan in 2010/11.
2.15.10 Kempsey Town Centre Master Plan Review
During the reporting period, Council resolved to adopt the following projects based on
the Town Centre Master Plan 1997:
40 km/h zone and pedestrian friendly environment for West Kempsey Shire
Council;
Intersection design for Smith Street and Belgrave Street;
Revitalization Concept for the Clyde Street Mall;
Median Strip Design Concept for Belgrave Street; and
Footpath in and around Coles.
Council is currently working on a comprehensive review of the Town Centre Master
Plan. This review has been placed on hold, as the Kempsey Shire Council Bypass
Strategy overlaps with this project. Consideration of new urban designs for the Town
Centre is an integral part of the detailed actions with the Bypass Strategy.
2.15.11 Review of South West Rocks Structure Plan
Effective planning for facilities, infrastructure and reviews for South West Rocks
requires the 1995 Structure Plan to be reviewed. Investigations that are either
currently being undertaken or have been completed in order to finalise the review
include:
The Local Environmental Studies for Saltwater and former Shell site (see above);
The Spencerville to New Entrance Investigation Area (see above);
Saltwater Creek Estuary Management Plan (now completed);
Saltwater Creek Flood Study (now completed);
SWR Open Space Strategies;
Preparation of a Stormwater Management Strategy;
Traffic Study;
SWR Landscape Ecology Specialist Study; and
Saltwater DCP.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 36 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Upon completion of these investigations it is proposed to integrate them into an overall
review of the Structure Plan.
An Ecological Assessment of the Spencerville / New Entrance corridor in the context of
the South West Rocks area has been completed and will be used in the review of the
South West Rocks Structure Plan review. The assessment confirms that the area
contains areas of high biodiversity which is likely to constrain future expansion of SWR.
Further consideration of this area will now be considered by individual rezoning
applications.
2.15.12 Macleay Valley Coast Vision 2030
This project will result in an overarching strategy incorporating Council‟s vision for
development within the Shire over the next 20 years.
The strategy will, in effect, form the basis for Council‟s Strategic Planning Program
which will be used to prioritise required funding and will address a significant number
of actions under Council‟s Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) Strategy.
Preliminary scoping for the strategy has been completed and an internal discussion
paper developed. A Consultant was also appointed to assist in the development of a
methodology for the project.
Expressions of Interest from members of the community to serve on a focus group
were sought; however, no responses had been received to date.
The project has not progressed in 2010/11 due to the preparation and implementation
of the Bypass Strategy being given a higher priority.
2.15.13 Kempsey Bypass Strategy
Construction of the Pacific Highway Bypass commenced during the reporting period.
Council is currently preparing a Bypass Strategy outlining how Council will be
responding to the upgrade of the Pacific Highway, which will result in the bypass of
Kempsey CBD, South Kempsey and Frederickton. A background issues paper has
been prepared and further detailed projects are being developed by Council. Council
has finalised the Bypass Strategy and has created a position within the organisation to
implement actions outlined in the plan.
2.16 REGULATORY PLANNING ASSESSMENT & COMPLIANCE
Kempsey Shire Council has a responsibility to ensure that proposed development and
those being undertaken are in accordance with the performance objectives of Council‟s
planning controls and regulatory controls.
Indicator – Compliance Register
Why use this indicator?
Council has now implemented a compliance register to provide a measurement of the
number and types of non-compliances and development conducted without consent.
Table 5 lists the number of each non-compliance category.
Table 5 - Compliance Register
Non-Compliance
Category
Number
2005-
2006
Number
2006-
2007
Number
2007-
2008
Number
2008-
2009
Number
2009-
2010
Number
2010-
2011
Unauthorised 17 16 69 151 73 56
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 37 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Non-Compliance
Category
Number
2005-
2006
Number
2006-
2007
Number
2007-
2008
Number
2008-
2009
Number
2009-
2010
Number
2010-
2011
Development
Compliance of
Development Consent
7 28 49 62 22 22
Unauthorised Land
Clearing
8 25 * 16 23 10
Quarries 1 1 * 1 6 3
Notes - * During 2007/08 unauthorised land clearing and Quarries were included in the totals of Unauthorised Development and Compliance of Development Consent.
What does this show?
The compliance register is now in its sixth year of operation, with updated data for the
2010/2011 reporting period showing there was a total of 91 non compliances, of which
56 related to unauthorised development and 22 related to compliance of development
consent.
2.17 ACID SULFATE SOILS MANAGEMENT
2.17.1 Existing Projects
The following ASS management projects were undertaken during the reporting period:
Andersons Drain Project Maria R – will aim to control and manage water levels,
enhance and remediate the surrounding acid sulfate soils backswamp and wetland
environment, through better floodgate management.
Riley’s Drain Project - is currently being investigated for the purpose of
implementing a water quality / backswamp remediation project.
McCudden Drain Project – commenced work and expected to be completed by
November 2011.
Indicator – Number of ASS Remedial Projects undertaken on Floodplain
Drainage Systems
Why use this indicator?
As discussed above, ASS are the most significant land degradation issue in the
Kempsey Shire and therefore any remedial actions taken to reduce and prevent
impacts from ASS should be reported and encouraged.
What does it show?
There are approximately 115 floodplain drainage systems that discharge into
waterways within the KSC area. They are in varying conditions and dimensions with
52 managed by KSC, 7 jointly managed and 56 privately managed. 105 of the drains
are situated in High Risk ASS landscapes, although not all drains require ASS
remediation works.
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 38 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Remedial works undertaken during the 2010/11 reporting period included three drain
modifications using external and internal funding. Further remediation projects are
continuing but are always dependent on landholder support and external funding.
2.18 CONTAMINATED LAND REMEDIATION
Former Fuel Terminal Sites – Phillip Drive, South West Rocks
Former Caltex Terminal Site
Following the outcome of the meetings held in early 2006 with Caltex, and the then
Department‟s of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), discussing residual contamination and possible management
strategies for the area surrounding the former Caltex Fuel Terminal site, Caltex
prepared a draft Groundwater Management Plan for the area. The Plan aims to set in
place procedures to restrict access to potential contaminated groundwater in the
vicinity of the plume and ensure appropriate management of the plume well into the
future.
Former Shell Terminal Site
A Local Environmental Study (LES) and subsequent Local Environmental Plan (LEP)
have been prepared for the former Shell Fuel Terminal site immediately adjacent to the
west of the Caltex site. This LEP will permit the subdivision of approximately 50 lots,
following rehabilitation of the land to remove contaminated soil resulting from the
previous use of the land to store petroleum. A Development Application to rehabilitate
the land, which is a precondition to any development of the land, was approved by
Council and works have been carried out with the aim to remediate the site.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done?
2.19 ACID SULFATE SOILS - PROPOSED PROJECTS
A number of ASS management projects are in progress with completion to be expected
by November 2011, including:
1. McCudden Drain Project
2. Anderson Drain Project Maria River - The Anderson Drain project is
currently being developed to address over-drainage of the connecting
backswamp/wetland area, reduce the production and discharge of acidic water
discharges and improve water quality within and emanating from the drainage
system.
2.20 LAND DEGRADATION ASSESSMENT
A comprehensive Land Degradation Assessment, to include areas of moderate to
severe erosion, acid scalds, contamination and invasion of weed and feral species,
should be undertaken to gain a better understanding of the condition of land resources
within the Kempsey Shire. Development of this assessment requires funding in
addition to that proposed in Council‟s long term budget and therefore has been put on
hold for now.
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 39 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.21 MAPPING OF POTENTIAL PLUME(S) SURROUNDING FORMER FUEL
TERMINAL SITES
Once the draft Groundwater Management Plan for the area in the vicinity of the former
Caltex Fuel Terminal site is finalised, relevant information from this plan should be
collated and presented on Council‟s website to keep the community informed and
updated with the latest available information.
2.22 STRATEGIC PLANNING PROJECTS
2.22.1 Macleay Valley Coast Vision 2030
Council will be progressing this project over the coming year and seeking advice and
input from relevant professionals and the broader community.
The final strategy will, in effect, form the basis for Council‟s Strategic Planning Program
which will be used to prioritise required funding and will address a significant number
of actions under Council‟s ESD Strategy.
This project has been given a lower priority while the Bypass Strategy Implementation
has been given a higher one.
2.22.2 Standard LEP
The Standard LEP was provided to the DoP in July 2010 seeking a section 65
Certificate. The Standard LEP is scheduled for completion in July 2012.
2.22.3 Residential Land Release Strategy
The DoP has since considered the draft Strategy and Council is currently making
adjustments as required by the DoP. The DoP have approved the plan with some
exclusions.
2.22.4 Spencerville to New Entrance Investigation
Finalise ecological investigations required for rezoning of land in the Spencerville to
New Entrance area and incorporate into SWR Structure Plan Review.
2.22.5 Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management
Implementation of the Koala Plan of Management has commenced and will continue
into 2012.
2.22.6 Review of South West Rocks Structure Plan
Continue work on key strategies required for the development of a Structure Plan.
2.22.7 Kempsey Bypass Strategy Implementation
Council has created a position within the organisation of Bypass Strategy Coordinator
to implement the strategy.
2.22.8 Rural Residential Component of Residential Local Growth
Management Strategy
Council will be preparing and completing this strategy in 2011/12.
2.22.9 Comprehensive Development Control Plan
Council is preparing a comprehensive DCP which will update and convert DCP’s to
make them consistent with the Standard LEP.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 40 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2.22.10 Developer Contribution Plans
Council will be preparing various contribution plans as needed to accompany DCP’s for
the South Kempsey area following the Bypass construction.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 41 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 3 WATER
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE Future Directions
Inland Waters
Rainfall/Riverflow – The total rainfall over the 2010/2011 period was generally below the Shire
average.
Surface Water Extraction – 156 active surface water licenses in the Kempsey Shire LGA, with a volumetric allocation of 5596 ML.
Groundwater Extraction – Groundwater extraction
volumes supplied by Macleay Water totalled 2550 ML for Kempsey and Lower Macleay.
Monitoring – ongoing monitoring of rainfall and river flow data to assess any potential future trends associated with predicted climate change.
Groundwater Borefield Assessment – was undertaken to assist in ensuring sustainable extraction.
Total water consumption – reduction due to BASIX, recycling, community awareness and education.
Catchment Education Program – Macleay Water has continued to provide catchment education through the Waterwise Schools Accreditation System as part of the partnership with Coffs Harbour City Council, Clarence Valley Council and the Cascade Environmental School.
EMP’s – implementation and development.
Catchment Education Programs - The Waterwise Accreditation Program will continue into the 2010/11 reporting period under Macleay Water‟s Demand Management Program.
Water Quality – defined by its physical, chemical, biological and aesthetic (appearance and smell) characteristics. Generally good in most receiving waters in the Shire, although some water bodies suffer from low dissolved oxygen levels, faecal coliform contamination and in some areas excess nutrients and minor heavy metal contamination.
Water Pollution –
On-Site Sewer Management;
Sewage Outlets; Stormwater; Agricultural Practices; Historic Mining
Activities.
OSMS Management – Implementation of Council‟s OSMS strategy.
Pollution Reduction Programs (PRP) – Submit investigation report for PRP on all seven STP‟s (West Kempsey, South Kempsey, Crescent
Head, Gladstone, Hat Head, South West Rocks, Frederickton) analysis of overflow risks within the sewerage reticulation system. Work has commenced and is progressing to minimise the risk of sewage overflows to the environment.
Stormwater Management – Installation of a number of gross pollutant traps. Beachwatch Program - Kempsey Shire Council continued its bacteriological monitoring program throughout the beach season in 2010/2011. Catchment Education Programs – Waterwatch & Waterwise Programs have been delivered to local Primary Schools by the Macleay Waterwatch Team. Waterway & Wetland Rehabilitation Projects
Continue implementation of On-site Sewage Management Strategy (OSMS).
Beachwatch Water Quality Monitoring in Rivers / Creeks / Estuaries and Beaches.
EMP’s – continue to develop additional EMP‟s.
Catchment Education Programs - the Waterwatch Program will continue into the 2011/12 reporting period.
Flooding – Moderate Development on Flood Policy Floodplain Risk
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 42 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Flood experienced in June 2011.
Floodplain
Artificial Drainage
Damage to infrastructure
Saltwater Creek Catchment Flood Study - was finalised and adopted by Council in September 2007.
Town planning and building controls.
Management Plan – a comprehensive study to address health & safety, agricultural production, conservation of sensitive wetland environments and impacts of predicted sea level rise associated with climate change and global warming.
Riparian Vegetation –over half (59.74%) of the riparian zone survey consisted of improved pasture, with 23.4% containing mangrove forest or woodland and 2.09% maritime rush and sand couch.
Riparian Disturbance -
66.9% or 232 km having a HIGH degree of disturbance;
13.8% or 48 km considered to be INTACT;
10.1% or 35 km having a LOW degree of disturbance;
9.1 % or 31.6km of the vegetation varying in disturbance from LOW -MODERATE disturbance levels.
Nestle Community Vegetation Project – Jerseyville & Smithtown Both projects completed, which included planting of over 4,000 endemic trees species and construction of a walking path. A suite of descriptive signs, outlining the importance of native riparian vegetation has been completed.
Boyters Lane Wetland and Riparian Rehabilitation – two stormwater management wetlands are in place & functioning. Vegetation buffer installed between the sports field & the artificial wetlands. Bird Hide educational facility constructed adjacent to wetlands. In addition over 12,000 endemic native trees have been planted on the site.
Gills Bridge Creek Rehabilitation Plan – Adopted by Council in 2007. Bush regeneration works, weed spraying, environmental education and stormwater improvement measures have commenced and continued through 10/11.
Implementation of Gills Bridge Creek Rehabilitation Plan – continue to undertake remedial work in those priority areas for weed and rubbish removal and reinstatement of native endemic vegetation. Work towards achieving project objectives.
EMP’s – Continue implementation and development of further EMP‟s.
Coastal Creeks and Estuaries
Estuarine Habitats – the Macleay Estuary Waterway is approximately 13km2. The lower Macleay (as of 1984) contained 5% of the state Mangrove habitat.
Acid Sulfate Soils – have the potential to result in sulphuric acid leaching into waterways.
Recreational Users – the Shire offers a wide range of aquatic activities.
Fishing and Fish Kills – There was a reported 44,033kg of fish catches, with an estimated value of $480,484 during the 10/11 reporting period. The number of reported commercial fishing operations increased from 15 to 18 during 10/11.
No fish kill incidents were reported to DPI Fisheries during the 10/11 period.
Beach watch – Changed from Faecal sampling to enterococci. 11 sites were tested.
Fisheries and Aquaculture Management
Estuary Management Plans - implementation of high priority actions in both Killick Creek and Saltwater Creek and Lagoon Estuary Management Plans. Korogoro Creek EMP has been completed.
Macleay River EMP is currently with the Minister for endorsement.
Review existing EMP’s.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 43 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Coastal Wetlands – there are over 150km2 of coastal wetlands in the Shire.
Coastal Development
Wetland Drainage
Boyters Lane Wetland Design and Construction - completion of two stormwater management wetlands.
EMP’s – implementation.
Planning & Development Controls - SEPP 14.
Beach Habitats –
there is approx. 80km of coastline forming the eastern boundary of the Shire.
Coastal Development
Recreational Activity - Degradation to EEC from vehicular and pedestrian movement particularly during holiday periods.
Beach watch – Enterococci sampling at 11 locations.
Planning & Development Controls.
EMP’s – rehabilitation works and projects.
Korogoro Creek – construction of walkway to protect EEC Saltmarsh.
Macleay River Estuary Management Plan (as above).
Beach watch – continued water quality monitoring over the 2010/11 beach season.
Education - Community education and remedial action.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 44 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Water is essential to human life and to the health of the environment. It is a valuable
natural resource, encompassing marine, estuarine, freshwater (river and lakes) and
groundwater environments, across coastal and inland areas (NSW EPA 2005). Water
resources are crucial for sustaining communities, agriculture, industry and most
importantly the environment.
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability and how are they affecting the aquatic
environment?
3.2 INLAND WATERS
The majority of the Kempsey Shire is contained within the Macleay River catchment,
with the exception of south-eastern corner of the Shire, which drains to the Hasting
River Catchment. There are many sub-catchments that drain into these main
catchments as is demonstrated on Figure 5 below.
Figure 5 – Inland Waterways in the Kempsey Shire LGA
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 45 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.3 Rainfall
Indicator – Cumulative Rainfall
Why use this indicator?
The cumulative annual rainfall gives an indication of rainfall trends, which can be
compared to the long-term average rainfall. This can be used to identify unusually
high or low rainfall years and spikes relating to significant rainfall periods.
Cumulative Annual Rainfall for Kempsey (2004 to June 2011)
0.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
Month
Cu
mu
lati
ve R
ain
fall
(mm
)
AVERAGE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Figure 6 – Cumulative Annual Rainfall for Kempsey (2004 to June 2011)
Cumulative Monthly Rainfall for Selected Stations 2010/2011
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11
Month
Rai
nfa
ll (m
m)
BELLBROOK RAINFALL (mm) KEMPSEY RAINFALL (mm) SWR RAINFALL (mm)
Figure 7 – Monthly Rainfall for Selected Stations 2010/2011
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 46 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Long Term Average Annual Rainfall for Selected Stations across Kempsey
LGA
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
BELLBROOK KEMPSEY SWR
Selected Stations
Ave
rage
An
nu
al R
ain
fall
(mm
)
Figure 8 – Long term Average Annual Rainfall for Selected Stations across Kempsey LGA
What does this show?
The total rainfall over the 2010/2011 period was generally below the Shire average, as
demonstrated in Figure 6. During the month of June 2011, the Shire experienced high
rainfall events, whilst the remainder of the 2010/2011 reporting period, the Shire
experienced below average rainfall events.
Figures 7 and 8 show rainfall data for three selected areas of the Shire. Figure 7
demonstrates monthly rainfall data for the selected areas while Figure 8 shows long
term average annual rainfall for these same areas.
Overall, the data indicates the presence of three rainfall zones; coastal (SWR), inland
(Kempsey) and hinterland (Bellbrook), with increasing rainfall towards the coast.
3.4 RIVER FLOWS
Indicator – Macleay River Flow
Why use this indicator?
Macleay River flow monitoring data (Turner‟s Flat) was chosen as an indicator to
identify trends that may assist in the management of water resources drawn from the
river. The data presented in Figure 9 is on a logarithmic scale to enable the full range
of flows to be more easily viewed.
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 47 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Macleay River Flows
0.0
10000.0
20000.0
30000.0
40000.0
50000.0
60000.0
70000.0
80000.0
90000.0
100000.0
JAN FEB MA APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Month
Riv
er
Flo
w (
ML\
d)
2003 FLOWS 2004 FLOWS 2005 FLOWS2006 FLOWS 2007 FLOWS 2008 FLOWS2009 FLOWS 2010 FLOWS 2011 FLOWS
Source: Macleay Water 2011
Figure 9 – Macleay River Flows
What does this show?
Trends in river flow data for the 2010/11 period have mimicked previously known river
peaks of January/March and June/July followed by the more traditional steady flows
with minor peaks in the latter half of the year.
The significant peak river flows of recent years (2008-2011), have resulted from east
coast lows travelling along the NSW coast and are typical of La Nina cycles. The new
June/July pattern that is evident in recent years has been from east coast low weather
events and the pattern is being monitored for consistency.
Figure 9 indicates that, on the basis of recent years, higher river flows predominate in
the January/March and June/July period. These river flow peaks currently appear to be
a return to more „normal‟ weather patterns following the drought sequence (El Nino) of
the 1990s and early 2000s. Additional data in further years will provide further
confirmation in this respect.
3.5 WATER QUALITY
Water quality is commonly defined by its physical, chemical, biological and aesthetic
(appearance and smell) characteristics. The quality of water in waterways and
groundwater are generally dependant on the activities undertaken in the catchment.
Water resources are of major environmental, social and economic value to the
Kempsey Shire and if water quality becomes degraded this resource will lose its value.
Effective management of water quality needs to ensure a sustainable supply of water
is available for productive and recreational purposes, while sustaining aquatic
ecosystems. Therefore, a whole of catchment approach is required to achieve
sustainable water cycle management.
Water quality is generally good in most receiving waters in the Shire, although some
water bodies suffer from low dissolved oxygen levels, low pH, faecal coliform
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 48 - Printed on Recycled Paper
contamination and in some areas excess nutrients and minor heavy metal
contamination.
Council continues to operate its water quality monitoring program for a number of
selected downstream tributaries of the Macleay River. Ten permanent telemetry water
quality stations are installed in Clybucca/Collombatti Creek, Kinchela Creek, Belmore
River and Killick Creek. The stations continually measure dissolved oxygen, pH,
electrical conductivity, temperature and water levels, while some stations are capable
of recording rainfall data. The recorded data is transmitted back to Council‟s central
computer every 15 minutes. The monitors also have the capability to physically collect
samples for further laboratory analysis if required.
The water quality data from all ten monitoring locations is updated in real-time (every
15 minutes) and displayed on Council‟s website: http://www.kempsey.nsw.gov.au/.
The data is displayed as graphs, in easy to understand format for landholders or any
other interested parties to view online.
Indicator – River Health (Macleay Catchment)
Why use this indicator?
The importance of using biological criteria, or indicators, to assess the health of
aquatic ecosystems, and in general the need to adopt an ecosystem health perspective
in monitoring and managing our rivers, is increasingly being recognised. Aquatic
ecosystem health is a much broader concept than simple water quality: it aims at a
balanced, adaptive community of organisms having a species composition, diversity
and functional organisation comparable to that of natural, or pristine, habitats of the
region.
The then NSW EPA (now part of DECCW) assessed the ecological health of running
waters in 2004, using an interactive computer package, AusRivAS. This package
outputs for samples collected from different stream habitats, and different seasons, at
a stream site, which are used together to provide a more complete picture of the
condition of macroinvertebrate communities within the stream at that location. (NSW
EPA, 2004).
What does this show?
No updated information regarding ecological health of running waters was available
from DECCW (EPA branch) for inclusion into this SoE Report. However, the 2004
Comprehensive SoE Report provides a full list of the creeks and rivers assessed by the
study in 2004, within the Kempsey Shire and their rating.
3.6 FLOODING
Flooding upstream of Kempsey is confined to areas close to the river and its tributaries
though in the more severe events quite large areas can be inundated in the Temagog,
Mooneba, Sherwood, Turners Flat, Dondingalong and Euroka areas. Much larger areas
downstream of Kempsey are vulnerable to flooding. During flood episodes, backwater
flows up the tributary creeks and drains begin to fill the swamps. In larger events,
flows also occur over the riverbanks, which in some areas have been augmented by
levee building.
3.7 RIPARIAN VEGETATION
Riparian vegetation is vegetation on land that adjoins, directly influences or is
influenced by, a body of water (NSW Fisheries 2005). Riparian vegetation plays an
Conclusion: Unknown
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 49 - Printed on Recycled Paper
important role in stabilising the banks of watercourses, providing flora and fauna
habitat and filtering out pollutants.
The Macleay River Estuary Data Compilation Study identified a variety of vegetation
communities occurring along the riparian zones of the Macleay River from Belgrave
Falls upstream of Kempsey to the entrance into the ocean at South West Rocks. Key
findings of the survey showed that over half (59.74%) of the riparian zone survey
consisted of improved pasture, with 23.4% containing mangrove forest or woodland
and 2.09% maritime rush and sand couch.
3.8 AQUATIC HABITAT
Freshwater systems provide a diverse range of habitats. The type of habitat and
suitability for different types of fauna is dependent on channel substrate, plants,
woody debris, water depth, flow velocity and light infiltration.
Past surveys have indicted that up to 53 of the 82 fish species identified in NSW fresh
waters are known to occupy the north coast drainages, although not necessarily the
Macleay and its tributaries. Approximately 60 species of birds and numerous reptiles,
animals and frogs occupy or facilitate aquatic habitats in the Macleay.
3.9 GROUNDWATER
The Kempsey Shire has two main sources of groundwater: the Macleay River Alluvium
and the Macleay Coastal Sands. The Macleay River Alluvium (MRA) is a groundwater
source linked to the flow of water in the Macleay River. The amount of water stored in
the MRA above Belgrave Falls is small. However, the water available is increased by
rain falling over the aquifer and the recharge (causing water from the river to flow over
the sands of the aquifer) of the alluvium with river water.
The Macleay Coastal Sands (MCS) are a fresh groundwater source in the sands below
the coastal dune system. The water stored in these dunes is recharged by rainfall.
These fresh water sources are bordered by salty seawater.
The MCS is now the subject of an intense multi-year investigation to determine how
this aquifer functions, its recharge mechanisms, the capacity of its storage and the
impacts of withdrawals from the storage. This investigation has been successful in
gaining federal funding and is a partnering arrangement with State Government, Local
Government and private consultants groups.
This project is now in its third year. A mid-project seminar was conducted in
September 2009 to discuss draft reports, findings to date and refocus the remainder of
the project. Information is statistically beginning to develop reliable trends. Final
project reports and recommendations are due in mid-2011. Information in
collaboration with other physical and geographical data gathered has already begun to
improve the understanding of the aquifer.
3.10 COASTAL WETLANDS, ESTUARIES AND OCEAN
3.10.1 Estuarine Habitats
The Macleay River estuary extends some 54km upstream from the ocean to the tidal
limit at Belgrave Falls. There is approximately 400km2 of coastal floodplain below
Kempsey, consisting of well defined natural levees, up to seven metres above 0m AHD
along river and creeks, grading to large semi-permanent backswamps often less than
one metre above 0m AHD and occasionally below sea level. These back swamps cover
some 240km2, representing approximately 60% of the floodplain (GECO
Environmental, 2005).
Eight „Endangered Ecological Communities‟ have been identified to occur within the
Macleay Estuary area, including:
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 50 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Littoral Rainforest;
Lowland Rainforest;
Coastal saltmarsh;
Freshwater Wetlands on Coastal Floodplains;
Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains;
Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest;
Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest; and
River Flat Eucalypt Forest on Coastal Floodplains.
Preliminary mapping of the area of four of these identified endangered ecological
communities has recently been undertaken through the Macleay River Estuary Data
Compilation Study, which will form part of the Macleay Estuary Management Plan. This
mapping indicated there was 62.566ha of littoral rainforest, 6.05ha of lowland
rainforest, 11.322km coastal saltmarsh and 1.18km of swamp oak floodplain forest
within the Macleay Estuary area. However the figures given for coastal saltmarsh and
swamp oak floodplain forest represent only the area of that EEC which has an interface
with rivers / creeks or is immediately adjacent to
rivers and creeks and does not represent the
total area (GECO Environmental, 2005).
3.10.2 Coastal Wetlands
The Shire has over 15,000ha of wetlands on the
floodplain, mainly in the Clybucca, South West
Rocks, Belmore-Kinchela and Crescent Head
areas. SEPP 14 wetlands account for 12,951ha
of this.
The Clybucca Estuary (including the Yarrahapinni
Broadwater), Belmore swamps and Kinchela
swamps are listed in the Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia (ANCA 1996).
Significant wetlands are also located in Hat Head National Park in dune hind-swamps.
Goolawah Lagoon is also listed as being required to have “Significant Protection” under
the Coastal Lakes Strategy (CLS): An Assessment and Management Framework
(2002).
3.10.3 Beach Habitats
The Macleay Valley has approximately 80km of coastline of which most is beaches
extending from south of Crescent Head and north to Grassy Head.
Naturally occurring beach ecosystems are dynamic and consist of tidal zones, fore
dune and hind dune areas. Dunal areas are critical for the protection of beaches, as
they provide natural „buffer zones‟ that reduce the impact of fluctuations of the
shoreline and erosion by the sea. Native dunal vegetation can provide a significant
refuge and source of food for local and migratory fauna species.
Many beach habitats across the Macleay Valley coastline have been impacted on by the
activities of humans. Such activities include recreational use, establishment of
environmentally inappropriate exotic vegetation, roads, car parks, beach access tracks,
and mining.
PRESSURE
Why is it happening?
3.11 SURFACE WATER EXTRACTION
The extraction of surface water for agricultural, industrial and domestic purposes
occurs within the Macleay Catchment. This can place stress on creek and rivers and
Plate 4 Teal Lagoon
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 51 - Printed on Recycled Paper
aquatic ecosystems, particularly during periods of low rainfall where flows are
dramatically reduced.
Surface water licensing was previously the responsibility of NSW Department of Water
and Energy (DWE), now the NSW Office of Water (NOW) under the Water Act (1912).
Data received from NOW during the 2010/11 reporting period indicated there were 156
active surface water licenses in the Kempsey Shire LGA, with a volumetric allocation of
5596 ML. There is an additional 26 access licenses allocated under the Stuarts Point
Groundwater Water Sharing Plan. This plan operates under the provisions of the Water
Management Act which is progressively replacing the Water Act.
Council has registered surface water licenses to extract water from the Macleay River
at both Bellbrook and Willawarrin.
Indicator – Town Water Consumption
This indicator provides a measure of the pressure on the Macleay Catchments water
resources.
See Section 6.4.1 – Water Consumption of Chapter 6 - Human Settlements
3.12 GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION
Water for the Kempsey District Water Scheme is extracted from the bores located in
the alluvial flats adjacent to Macleay River, and from near the river at Bellbrook. This
supplies Kempsey and surrounds, Bellbrook, Willawarrin, Frederickton, Smithtown,
Gladstone, Clybucca, Kinchela, Belmore River and contingent rural areas.
Water is also extracted from borefields located in coastal dunal areas to supply the
coastal townships of South West Rocks, Crescent Head, Stuarts Point and Hat Head.
The following table indicates the extraction volumes for each water supply schemes for
the 2010/11 reporting period.
Table 6 - Groundwater Extraction Volumes 10/11
WATER SUPPLY SCHEME EXTRACTION VOLUME (ML)
Bellbrook 8.98
Willawarrin 8.24
Kempsey & Lower Macleay 2550.94
Crescent Head 138.45
Hat Head 41.41
South West Rocks 536.65
Stuarts Point 134.54
Updated data regarding other sources of groundwater extraction within the Shire
licensing was not available from DWE at the time of reporting.
3.13 WATER POLLUTION
Water quality of aquatic ecosystems in the region is subject to degradation from both
point source and non-point source pollution. The input of chemicals, nutrients,
suspended solids, and rubbish into waterways are the main factors effecting aquatic
ecosystems. Practices and systems directly affecting water quality include:
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 52 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.13.1 Sewage Discharges
Leaks in sewage pipes and insufficient treatment of sewage waters can have the
potential to cause delivery of nutrients and faecal coliform either directly or indirectly
into groundwater or waterways.
Indicator – EPA Licensed Point Source Discharges
Why use this indicator?
The number of point source discharges is an accepted regional indicator. This provides
information on the number and location of point source discharges and identifies
activities that can have potential adverse effects on natural aquatic environment
systems.
What does this show?
The 2009/10 Supplementary report indicated that DECCW (EPA Branch) identified 28
active licences under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, within
the Kempsey Shire. Data obtained during the 2010/11 reporting period indicated 27
active licenses, including seven Council operated Sewage Treatment Plants, seven
Council operated sites and 13 privately owned operations.
3.13.2 On-Site Sewage Management
Monitoring and assessing of on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems on
individual properties is the main focus of Kempsey Shire Council‟s On-site Sewage
Management Strategy. On-site sewage management systems (OSMS) are issued an
annual approval to operate with listed conditions that the owner is required to comply
with. Council carries out monitoring inspections on OSMS within the Shire to ensure
that the OSMS is compliant with the approval conditions. The current strategy
implementation is focused on the assessment of systems in areas that are perceived as
being high risk in terms of the environment and/or public health. Focus is also directed
towards assessing systems in remote areas of the Shire that have not been inspected
yet and facilitating noncompliant system remediation.
Indicator – On-site Sewage Management (OSM) - Number and Compliance
Why use this indicator?
Restrictive lots sizes, poor system design, high water tables, unsuitable soil types, lack
of public awareness and poor management practices, or a combination of all these are
the common contributing factors that result in failing on-site sewage management
systems within the Macleay River Catchment Area. These issues contribute to poor
quality effluent entering the environment resulting in ground and surface water
contamination, degradation of soil and vegetation, and in some instances posing a
threat to public health.
What does this show?
During the 2010/2011 reporting period 390 inspections have taken place with
approximately 119 (30%) reported as non-compliant on the first inspection.
Approximately 261 (67%) passed the initial or second inspection. These figures
indicate a total of 30% remaining non-compliant which is similar to the overall
percentage of non-compliances (30%) reported in the previous 2009/10 SoE Report.
The most common problems experienced with non-complying systems are trench
failure, overflow pipes and greywater diversion. Common non-compliance issues
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 53 - Printed on Recycled Paper
associated with Aerated Wastewater Treatment Systems (AWTS) were inappropriate
irrigation of treated effluent and no maintenance of the system (no service contract).
Direct overflow of wastewater from the septic tank without any disposal through
absorption trenching is also another common problem particularly in rural areas up-
river.
The above statistics indicate that during the 2010/2011 period, non-compliant systems
as a result of inspection are similar to that experienced in the previous year. It should
however be noted that Council‟s OSMS inspection program contributes to the
improvement of environmental and health outcomes within the Shire.
3.13.3 Stormwater Pollution
Stormwater can cause a variety of impacts depending upon the source of stormwater.
Water quality degradation results from delivery of the following into waterways:
Sediment, causing turbidity and sedimentation.
Toxins, chemicals and nutrients from roads and infrastructure, gardens etc.
Faeces from dogs and cats primarily in urban areas as well as livestock in rural
areas.
Litter which potentially carries chemicals etc, and can also be physically harmful
to aquatic organisms.
Vegetation material that increases nutrient levels while reducing the dissolved
oxygen levels.
The level of treatment of stormwater is either none or primary (bulk screening and
pollutant traps).
Council undertakes regular water quality monitoring of receiving water bodies in the
Shire. Samples are taken from a number of water bodies and popular beaches
throughout the beach season and analysed for faecal coliforms and in some cases
heavy metals. The results of this monitoring is updated regularly on Council‟s website
and described in more detail in Section 3.17 – Beachwatch.
The Kempsey Shire Stormwater Management Plan outlines the current and future
management action and strategies for the Kempsey Shire. For further information refer
to Section 3.16 – Stormwater Management.
3.13.4 Historic Mining Activities
Due to the considerable disturbance and modification of landscapes, mining activities
have the potential to impact on water quality of waterways both within the vicinity and
downstream of the mining site. Historic mining activities in particularly are often a
source of continued impacts on water quality due to both the lack of legislation to
enforce best environmental management practices at the time of operation and little to
no clean-up requirements following decommissioning of the mining operation.
The Kempsey Shire and broader Macleay Valley has and continues to service a variety
of extraction industries, ranging from local quarries to larger scale mining operations.
One of the richer mineral areas (particularly for antimony and gold deposits) in the
Macleay is known as the Hillgrove mineral field and it is in this area where many
historic mining sites are concentrated. Major ore production in this area has come from
about 14 mines, with production occurring intermittently between 1878 and 2002 and
recommenced during 2007. As a consequence of this long mining history in the
Hillgrove area, large volumes of mine wastes and mill tailings have been produced and
due to ineffective historic waste disposal practices at many of these sites, some of this
material has been transported down gradient into the Bakers Creek–Macleay River
Conclusion: Situation improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 54 - Printed on Recycled Paper
system by fluvial transportation (Ashley et al., 2007). The major concern regarding
mine waste migrating downstream is that it is contaminated with elevated
concentrations of antimony and arsenic and some other heavy metals and metalloids,
with the potential to impact on both environmental and public health.
A study was conducted by the University of New England (UNE) in 2007 to assess the
environmental and geochemical consequences of antimony and arsenic dispersion in
the Macleay River Catchment. The Study showed that although much of the Macleay
catchment is little affected from inputs of heavy metals and metalloids, the sub-
catchment of Bakers Creek draining Hillgrove mining field has been heavily
contaminated by antimony and arsenic. The study has also shown that some impacts
continue downstream from Bakers Creek extending into the trunk of the Macleay River
and subsequently to the floodplain and Pacific Ocean (Ashley et al., 2007). The
elevated concentrations of antimony and arsenic were recorded both within underlying
sediments and stream waters of Bakers Creek and the Macleay River.
A more recent study jointly undertaken by the University of Canberra, the Australian
National University and the University of New England in 2008, investigated the
bioaccumulation of antimony and arsenic in Bakers Creek. The results of the study
showed that the water and rhizosphere (zone that surrounds the roots of plants)
sediment of Bakers Creek contains significantly elevated levels of mining-derived
antimony and to a lesser extent arsenic. Antimony and arsenic concentrations were
elevated in aquatic autotrophs (water plants such as algae etc) but the data indicated
that antimony uptake was lower than arsenic uptake. Elevated antimony and arsenic
concentrations were found in some macroinvertebrates and other organisms, however
biomagnification was not evident.
The study also found that antimony and arsenic accumulation in the riparian
vegetation was not evident. Even though rhizosphere soil antimony and arsenic
concentrations were elevated, transfer to the plant leaves was low for both metalloids.
Elevated antimony concentrations were, however, present in the plant roots and
further investigations into the role of iron plaque on plant roots will improve the
current understanding of the plant uptake mechanisms for antimony. Based on the
antimony and arsenic concentrations measured in riparian vegetation, direct exposure
to the rhizosphere sediment and soils, water ingestion and consumption of aquatic
autotrophs appear to be the major routes of antimony and arsenic uptake for the fauna
of Bakers Creek (Telford et al 2009).
This most recent study was the first part of a catchment-wide project investigating
antimony and arsenic bioavailability, and also mobilisation with river flow regime in the
Macleay.
3.13.5 Agricultural Practices
Stock access to waterways within the Shire continues to cause a number of problems
for the aquatic environment. Most of these problems are caused by loss of riparian
vegetation, which results in:
Increased nutrient input to waterways;
Stream bank instability;
Erosion;
Reduced water quality; and
Spread and establishment of weeds.
3.13.6 Acid Sulfate Soils
ASS when disturbed can produce sulphuric acid that can drain into waterways and
cause severe short and long-term environmental and potential socio-economic
impacts. ASS is discussed in detail in Chapter 2 – The Land.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 55 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.13.7 Recreational Users
The waterways of the Kempsey Shire provide a wide range of recreational
opportunities. Recreational users rely on good water quality for health and safety,
aesthetics, and for productive values (e.g. fishing).
The use of waterways for recreational purposes can potentially have an adverse impact
on natural aquatic systems. Some examples include increase litter loading (including
fishing line and tackle), bank erosion from wave action of boats and effluent discharge
from watercraft.
3.14 DISTURBANCE OF RIPARIAN ZONES AND WEED INFESTATION
The Macleay River Estuary Data Compilation Study, finalised in August 2005, identified
the degree of disturbance along the riparian zones of the Macleay and its major
tributaries as:
66.9% or 232km having a HIGH degree of disturbance;
13.8% or 48km considered to be INTACT;
10.1% or 35km having a LOW degree of disturbance;
9.1 % or 31.6km of the vegetation varying in disturbance from LOW -
MODERATE disturbance levels.
Furthermore, 282.4 km or 81.4% of the mapped riparian zone contains Category 1
Weeds, which are the most serious environmental weeds on the North Coast, capable
of displacing native communities. For approximately half of this length, 130.1km,
these Category 1 Weeds are ranked as Common – Heavy. Category 2 Weeds account
for 24 km or 6.9% of the mapped riparian zone, while 40.5 km or 11.7% of the
mapped riparian zone does not contain any significant environmental weeds (GECO
Environmental 2005).
The main mechanisms of disturbance of riparian vegetation along the Macleay Estuary
are:
clearing;
ongoing disturbance associated with grazing and some agricultural practices;
disturbance associated with infrastructure including roads in close proximity to the
river and bank protection works, particularly rock revetment;
weed invasion including into otherwise intact remnant vegetation; and
periodic flooding.
Active wet seasons (linked to East Coast Lows) have generated a number of flood
events in the recent 3 years (with several severe floods on the Macleay River such as
the May 2009 event requiring Local, State and Federal Government Recovery support).
It is proposed that the severity and disturbance of such events has resulted in major
changes to weed infestation along flood impacted / degraded riparian corridors despite
active measures by weed officers and Contractors to combat impact within our LGA.
A new exotic weed has been identified on the Macleay as a major threat (the first know
Australian record – dated from August 2010). Native to South America the tropical
Soda Apple (Solanum viarum) has been recorded as an aggressive invader of North
American farmland and riparian corridor habitat. Currently the subject of a weed task-
force action by the DPI NSW the plant has been recorded from Georges Creek
(Armidale – Dumaresq Council Shire) downriver to Kempsey Shire at Five Day Creek
through to Turners Flat (locality) along the Macleay River. With additional records of
spread through stock transport (sighted at several regional saleyards e.g Kempsey,
Wingham, Gloucester etc) it is likely this weed has spread further within the Macleay
Shire through carriage by flood water, stock and other browse animal vectors.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 56 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.15 LOSS OF FISHERIES HABITAT AND WETLAND DRAINAGE
The following are recognised to have had significant impacts and influences on the
Shire‟s aquatic systems:
Wetland and Fisheries Habitat Modification: Impacts from drainage for flood
mitigation and agricultural extension e.g. habitat loss, altered inundation cycles,
increased sedimentation.
Effects of Acid Sulfate Soils on Aquatic Habitat and Biota: Compounding the
impacts of the above, ASS has had major impacts on water quality, habitat and
biota directly (e.g. via mortality and altered growth/development) and indirectly
(e.g. altered water quality and loss of habitat).
3.15.1 Fishing and Fish Kills
Indicator – Fish Kills
Why use this indicator?
Identifying fish kills in the Shire may identify potential harmful activities causing
pollution of waterways.
Fish kills in the Shire often result from a range of causes as shown below. The cause of
the kills often goes undiagnosed however the majority of cases are caused by one of
three most common causes:
low dissolved oxygen;
pesticide / chemical pollution;
sewerage discharge or other pollution (NSW DPI 2005).
Source: NSW DPI
Note: DO = dissolved oxygen. ASS = acid sulfate soils discharge
Figure 10 - Causes of Fish Kills in NSW
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 57 - Printed on Recycled Paper
NSW Fisheries have a database per catchment for fish kills. Fish kills have been
previously recorded with various causes in Killick Creek, Kinchela Creek, Clybucca
Creek, Saltwater Creek (South West Rocks), the Macleay and Belmore Rivers, the
Golden Hole and South West Rocks. As expected, most records are on the lower
reaches, but a few fish kills have occurred outside the Shire (e.g. Apsley Gorge and
Wollombi River).
Fish kills generally occur during flood recession as deoxygenated water on the
floodplain drains back into the main stream where the majority of fish are living. Fish
deaths have also occurred in rivers where a section of “black water”, so named
because of the colour resulting from the high level of dissolved tannins and lignin from
decomposing organic matter, moves downstream at the beginning of a flood (NSW
DPI, 2000).
No fish kill events were reported to the NSW DPI - Fisheries during the 2010/11
reporting period.
Indicator – Fish Catches
Why use this indicator?
This indicator may provide a measure of the health of aquatic ecosystems as a result
of water quality or overfishing. Figure 11 below shows the estimated dollar value and
quantity in kilograms of commercial fish catches within the Macleay Estuary over the
past 10 financial years as supplied by the NSW DPI.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2001/0
2
2002/0
3
2003/0
4
2004/0
5
2005/0
6
2006/0
7
2007/0
8
2008/0
9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
Financial Year
Valu
e o
f C
atc
hes (
$)
& Q
uan
tity
of
Lan
din
gs (
kg
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Rep
ort
ed
Fis
hin
g O
pera
tio
ns
Reported Landings Kg
Est. Value of Landings
Reporting Fishing operations*
Note: Source – NSW DPI
1. Commercial wild harvest activity and landings are not alone an indicator of abundance as commercial landings are subject to various Environmental, Economic, Social and Legislative factors.
2. Ongoing validation may alter the species and weights reported herein. 3. Estimation of value is based on the Sydney Fish Market monthly prices by species - as such may not
reflect value adding, nor regional price variations. 4. A fishing operation may involve one or more licensed commercial fishers plus crew.
Figure 11 – Commercial Fish Catches
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 58 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
There was a reported 44,033kg of fish catches, with an estimated value of $480,484 in
the Macleay River and associated estuaries during the 2010/11 reporting period. The
number of reported commercial fishing operations increased from 15 to 18 during
2010/11.
In general, the quantity (kg) and value ($) of commercial fish catches within the
Macleay have fluctuated over the past 10 financial years, probably reflecting climatic
events in certain years, which either saw a decrease in fish populations or else
restricted the fishing fleet from operating during times of flooding or other severe
weather events such as storms. The number of commercial fishing operations has
decreased substantially from 40 in 1999/2000 to 18 in the 2010/11 reporting period.
The represented data indicates that there was an increase in quantity of total landings
(kg) in 2010/11 when compared with previous years. This is most likely attributed to
favourable weather conditions and an increase in the number of commercial fishing
operations.
It is evident that there is an overall declining trend of fish landings since 2002/03. This
may be attributed to a number of factors including a reduction in reported fishing
operations, frequency of storm events, reduced bag limits and/or reduction of fish
stocks.
There is no quantitative data on the recreational catch, but given the popularity of the
sport and numerous areas to fish, the catch is likely to be significant, especially in
smaller watercourses e.g. Belmore River, Kinchela Creek, Killick Creek and Korogoro
Creek.
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
3.16 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Council formally adopted the Kempsey Shire Urban Stormwater Management Plan
(SMP) in July 2004. The SMP focuses on environmental protection through improved
stormwater management and is based on the principles of Ecologically Sustainable
Development (ESD) and Total Catchment Management (TCM).
The SMP identified a range of general actions applicable to all of Council‟s urban areas
and a range of actions specific to each individual urban catchment. Many of the
actions listed reflect activities already being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken
by Council, including aligning existing operations across all of Council‟s departments to
ensure the outcomes meet the objectives of the stormwater management plan.
The utilisation of natural filtration systems, the methodology of data collection and
reports, along with the implementation of new treatment technologies will be
researched and reviewed as part of the update of the current SMP. Construction of
biofiltration devices at three sites located at South Kempsey has been completed.
3.17 SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT
3.17.1 Water Quality Monitoring
Macleay Water carries out monitoring at various locations within the Shire to ensure
wastewater discharged from its STP‟s to the environment is of acceptable quality. The
monitoring points are located at all of Council‟s Sewage Treatment Works, the
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 59 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Glenrock outfall – Macleay River and sand dune disposal points for the South West
Rocks and Hat Head Sewage Treatment Works.
Indicator – STP Effluent Discharge Quality (% Compliance)
Why use this indicator?
Monitoring the compliance of effluent discharge quality is an important indicator in that
it provides a measure of the quality of a potential pollution source. If a non-
compliance is identified, actions can be taken to rectify the problem. Table 7
summarises the percentage of compliance for the latest annual licence agreement.
Table 7 - Shire STW Effluent Quality
SHIRE STW EFFLUENT QUALITY
% COMPLIANCE FOR LATEST ANNUAL LICENCE RETURN
SITE BOD TSS O&G FC NH3 PH TN TP
West Kempsey 96 80 100 76 96 100 88 88
South Kempsey 100 96 100 NA NA NA NA NA
South West Rocks 91 91 100 NA 100 100 100 100
Crescent Head 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Gladstone 100 100 100 NA NA NA NA NA
Frederickton 100 83 100 NA NA NA NA NA
Hat Head 100 100 100 96 84 88 76 92
Note: Percentages only include 100 percentile failures.
What this indicator shows:
This indicator shows some parameters exceeding the NSW EPA‟s licensing
requirements over the past 12 months. Full compliance has not been achieved at West
Kempsey, South Kempsey, South West Rocks, Frederickton and Hat Head STP‟s.
At West Kempsey and South Kempsey, a number of non-compliances were attributed
to the floods in June 2011 and the excess loading experienced by the treatment
processes at these plants during the flood. West Kempsey also had some non-
compliance for nutrients due to failures in the process and low temperatures affecting
the process.
Consistent high temperatures in February and March resulted in algal blooms in the
tertiary ponds at Frederickton STP, resulting in TSS exceedances.
A new SCADA program was installed at Hat Head STP. Commissioning of this program
resulted in numerous problems which resulted in a number licence exceedances for
nutrients. In the June 2011 floods, excessive loadings at the Plant resulted in licence
exceedances. Operator error also resulted in some issues with Alum dosing which
resulted in exceedances for both pH and Phosphorous.
The South West Rocks STP experienced a number of exceedances due to problems
during commissioning of the new STP whilst contractors were responsible for the
process operation. Exceedances were also experienced due to excessive loading at the
plant during the June 2011 floods.
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 60 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.17.2 Pollution Reduction Program
Where the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has concerns with Council‟s licence
compliance for a sewage treatment plant, it may impose a Pollution Reduction Program
(PRP) to ensure a particular issue is regularly reported on and addressed. There are
currently a total of four such PRP‟s on two sewerage licences; West Kempsey and
South West Rocks.
At West Kempsey, the PRPs relate to, rehabilitation and construction of a new Sewage
Treatment Plant (STP). One of the PRP‟s requires rehabilitation work within the
sewerage reticulation system to reduce infiltration (predominantly stormwater) and
enable the STP to better cope with wet weather. There is also a PRP relating to the
construction programme for the new West Kempsey STP. The status of each PRP is
indicated below:
PRP U1 for West Kempsey infiltration programme, being progressively completed
from 2011,
PRP U2 West Kempsey new STP, being completed over several upcoming years.
At South West Rocks, the EPA has required Council to further improve the water
quality delivered back to the environment by disinfecting this returned water. These
improvements are additional to the recent STP upgrade. This work will be completed
during the 2011/12 financial year.
3.17.3 Sewage Infrastructure
Several programmes are currently underway to address the sewerage licence concerns
discussed in Section 3.17.1.
The new West Kempsey STP is being sited on higher land, most likely out of the 1 in
100 year flood frequency. The new STP treatment technology will aim to address the
nutrient failures and storm storage, whilst infiltration programmes in the longer term
will address stormwater ingress.
Concurrently, a review of the South Kempsey STP siting is underway as part of design
investigation to service the South Kempsey Employment Land. A review of the Gills
Creek catchment will also assess the flood frequency experienced in recent years.
At Hat Head STP, the new SCADA programme has provided a short term increase in
capacity and quality, whilst work to increase the treatment capacity long term
continues. Council has adopted plans to increase the Treatment Plant‟s capacity and
the detailed design is underway.
At South West Rocks, final commissioning of the STP is occurring with the expectation
of better licence compliance with the new infrastructure over the coming year.
3.17.4 Septic Tank Controls
Council has made changes to the OSM program and associated fee structure, which
was implemented in July 2010. The changes have resulted in improvements to the
program in regards to inspection monitoring. The new OSM program enables Council to
fund additional inspections and develop a more wide spread and thorough inspection
regime (including remote areas of the Shire). The program for the coming year
includes:
Inspections to be carried out on OSMS that have had non-compliance issues
identified in previous inspections.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 61 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Inspections of OSMS that have not yet been inspected (generally situated in
remote areas of the Shire).
Identification of unregistered OSMS and inspections carried out on these systems.
Increased water quality monitoring.
3.18 ANTIMONY AND ARSENIC DISPERSION IN THE MACLEAY RIVER
Mine waste from predominantly historical mine operations continue to be a concern
within the Valley. Antimony, arsenic and some other heavy metals/metalloids continue
to migrate downstream and the presence is being considered closely, particularly in
conjunction with large river events and floods. Ongoing monitoring and studies are
continuing.
3.19 FLOOD MITIGATION
The Draft Kempsey Flood Study was completed and endorsed by Council for the
purposes of public exhibition late in the 2008/09 reporting period. The Kempsey Flood
Study documents the methodology and outcomes of the hydraulic modelling
undertaken to determine the existing flood behaviour in the urban areas of Kempsey.
The second stage of the project involves undertaking a Flood Risk Management Study
and developing the Kempsey Flood and Floodplain Management Plan.
The three flood events (February, March and May) which occurred during the 2008/09
reporting period provided Council with the opportunity to test the current flood
procedures under operation and evaluate the impacts these procedures have through
public and emergency services debrief flood meetings. All three events were declared
„Natural Disasters‟ by the NSW Treasury and significant damage was sustained
particularly to flood mitigation levees, road and bridge infrastructure.
A further flood event occurred in June 2011 resulting in more damage to roads and
infrastructure.
3.20 BEACHWATCH
Kempsey Shire Council continued its bacteriological monitoring program throughout
the beach season in 2010/2011.
Council collects (as per recommended guidelines developed through the NSW EPA's
Pilot Beachwatch Program 2002) and analyses water samples collected at 11 locations.
The samples were collected weekly from October 2010 to April 2011 around the ebbing
low tide.
Indicator – Sewage Pollution
Monitoring
What do we test for?
Beachwatch monitors sample water at swimming locations to assess the level of faecal
contamination. In urban areas the main source of faecal contamination is human
sewage. Sewage poses a risk to human health because it can contain human
pathogens. When certain levels of sewage are detected, water may not be safe for
swimming.
Faecal contamination is detected by the presence of two bacterial indicator organisms,
faecal coliforms and enterococci. These bacteria are found in the intestines of warm
blooded animals and are present in very high numbers in raw sewage. Up to
10,000,000 faecal coliform bacteria can be present in just 100 millilitres of raw
sewage. It is important to note that these bacteria do not cause illness; rather, they
are measured to detect the presence of sewage and the possible presence of
pathogens.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 62 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Enterococci
Enterococci survive for much longer than faecal coliforms in marine waters. So the
detection of elevated enterococci levels, in conjunction with low levels of faecal
coliforms, indicates the presence of aged sewage contamination.
For primary contact (swimming) the median bacterial content in samples of fresh or
marine waters taken over the bathing season should not exceed:
Enterococci – median over bathing season of less than 35 enterococci/100 ml;
(maximum number in any one sample: 100 organisms/100 ml.
For secondary contact (boating/fishing) the median bacterial content in fresh and
marine waters should not exceed:
Enterococci – median bacterial content in marine waters of <230
enterococci/100 ml; (maximum number in any one sample: 450-700 organisms
per 100 ml)
What this indicator shows:
Council's Beachwatch Program continued throughout the 2010/2011 beach season in
which ten swimming locations were monitored for enterococci, including:
the ocean beaches of Grassy Head, Horseshoe Bay, Trial Bay, Hat Head and Killick;
the estuarine swimming location of Stuarts Point; and
four coastal creeks (Back Creek, Killick Creek, Saltwater Creek and Korogoro
Creek).
Table 8 - KEMPSEY COUNCIL BEACH SUITABILITY GRADE
2010/11
SITE NAME BEACH CLASS
Back Creek POOR
Grassy Head VERY GOOD
Hat Head Beach GOOD
Horseshoe Bay GOOD
Killick Beach GOOD
Killick Creek POOR
Korogoro Creek POOR
Saltwater Creek VERY POOR
Stuarts Point POOR
Trial Bay GOOD
Notes: Beach Classification Ratings: Very Good > Good > Poor > Very Poor.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 63 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.21 CATCHMENT EDUCATION
3.21.1 Waterwise Program
Council has continued to provide education programs within the Kempsey Shire to
facilitate sustainable use of water resources, providing healthier catchments, improving
catchment awareness and the Shire‟s water cycle. Council has instigated the
Waterwise Schools Accreditation System as part of the partnership with Coffs Harbour
City Council, Clarence Valley Council and the Cascade Environmental Education Centre.
This accreditation system value-adds to the West Australia‟s WaterCorp schools
accreditation system by delivering the program through a professional teacher and
supported assistance to the staff of the school throughout the accreditation process.
South Kempsey Public School was awarded their Waterwise Schools Accreditation
during the reporting year (2010/2011). Council is now heading towards the second
stage of the Waterwise schools accreditation programme where schools are re-visited
four years later and the next group of children at the school build upon the earlier
work completed.
Plate 5: Bellbrook Public School - Becoming an official Waterwise School
3.21.2 Waterwatch Program
Waterwatch is a national community-based water quality monitoring program, which
promotes environmental awareness and action through involvement. Primary schools,
high schools and community groups participate in the Waterwatch program.
Waterwatch NSW supports the involvement of local communities in taking
responsibility for their rivers and aquatic ecosystems. By monitoring water quality and
biological indicators, local communities can directly observe and learn about the health
of their waterways and identify whether changes are occurring.
To help facilitate the Program on the Macleay a training team has been set up, known
as the Macleay Waterwatch Team, made up of representatives from Kempsey Shire
Council (KSC), Macleay Landcare Network (MLN), Northern Rivers Catchment
Management Authority (NRCMA) and Cascade Environmental Education Centre (CEEC).
During the reporting period, students and teachers from Crescent Head Public School
met with the Macleay Waterwatch Team to undertake a Training Program to support
each of the Schools‟ ongoing testing of the water quality in nearby Killick Creek. The
students recorded the levels of pH, electrical conductivity, temperature and turbidity,
all of which give an indication of water quality.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 64 - Printed on Recycled Paper
The results obtained by each of the Schools will add to the baseline water quality data
already collected by Council and the Waterwatch NSW state-wide data base, and help
provide a measure of any changes in the condition of the creek system, as time goes
by.
3.22 WATERWAY AND WETLAND REHABILITATION AND PROTECTION
3.22.1 Nestle Community Vegetation Projects – Jerseyville & Smithtown
In partnership with Nestle and the local community, Council completed a riparian
revegetation project on a section of Council managed road reserve, off Plummers Lane,
near the Jerseyville Bridge. The project included planting of over 4,000 endemic trees
species and construction of a walking path. A suite of descriptive signs, outlining the
importance of native riparian vegetation are scheduled to be installed in the future.
Also in partnership with Nestle and local community members, including school
children, Council undertook a riparian rehabilitation project along a section of riverbank
at Smithtown Park. The project included the removal of 23.25 tonnes of invasive weed
species and planting of 1,000 locally endemic tree species.
Both of these projects have been completed.
3.22.2 Boyters Lane Wetland & Riparian Rehabilitation Project
Stormwater Management:
This stage of the project is now complete,
with two stormwater management wetlands in
place and functioning.
Plate 6 Constructed Wetland at Boyters Lane to treat runoff from proposed playing fields.
Riparian Revegetation Program:
A vegetation buffer between the sports field and the artificial wetlands has been
completed with in excess of 3,000 endemic rainforest tree species planted, with the
assistance of ROTARY South West Rocks.
Further revegetation works along with the preparation and design of an educational
walkway has commenced with 4,000 endemic rainforest trees and shrubs planted.
Wetland Education:
With assistance from ROTARY SWR a Birdhide/Outdoor Educational Facility has been
constructed adjacent to the wetlands.
3.23 ESTUARY MANAGEMENT
Council is committed to developing Estuary Management Plans (EMP‟s) for the systems
within our Shire. The EMP‟s are developed inline with protocols and procedures set
down in the NSW Estuary and Coastal Management Policy. Once developed, the EMP‟s
are implemented through the NSW Government Estuary and Coastal Management
Manuals.
Macleay River Estuary
The Data Compilation and Estuary Processes Studies have been completed. The
Estuary Management Study is currently with the Minister for certification.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 65 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Macleay River Estuary Ecological study
A comprehensive ecological study on the Macleay River Estuary was completed in
September 2010.
Korogoro Creek
Implementation of the management strategies described in the Korogoro Creek EMP
has commenced. The Plan follows the completion of the data compilation, mapping
and process studies.
Coastal Hazard Assessment
During the 2010/11 reporting period, Council commenced a Coastal Hazard
Assessment in accordance with the Guidelines for preparing Coastal Zone Management
Plans. The Plan consists of three stages:
1. Hazard Assessment,
2. Coastal Zone Study,
3. Coastal Zone Management Plan.
3.24 GILLS BRIDGE CREEK REHABILITATION PROJECT
Work on the Gills Bridge Creek Rehabilitation
Project was completed in January 2011. The
Environmental Trust funded project successfully
achieved significant improvements towards the
overall environmental condition of the creek with
actions such as; extensive bush regeneration
works, development of a stormwater
management strategy, a riparian flora and fauna
study of the catchment, environmental audits
and education programs with local business and various community engagement
activities over the three years.
A comprehensive stormwater management strategy was also completed during the
2009/10 period, with recommendations for placement of stormwater quality
improvement systems to be installed at a number of strategic locations along the creek
system. During 2011 two of the high priority stormwater bio-retention basins
(identified in the Stormwater Management Plan) were constructed.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done?
3.25 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
The Kempsey Shire Urban Stormwater Management Plan is being implemented and a
number of potential projects have been committed to improve water quality exiting the
stormwater infrastructure. See 3.16 for further details.
3.26 CATCHMENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS
The Waterwise Accreditation and Waterwatch Programs will continue into the 2011/12
reporting period under Council‟s Water demand management program.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 66 - Printed on Recycled Paper
3.27 ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLANS
Matching funding will be sought through the State Government‟s Estuary Management
Program to assist with implementation of high priority actions in both Killick Creek and
Saltwater Creek and Lagoon Estuary Management Plans.
Development of Estuary Management Plans for the entire Macleay River Estuary will
continue.
3.28 EMP’S IMPLEMENTATION
Continue implementing priority actions outlined in various EMP‟s.
3.29 GILLS BRIDGE CREEK REHABILITATION PROJECT
Preparation of a stage 2 management plan for Gills Bridge Creek has begun which will
outline future riparian vegetation maintenance and enhancement works for Gills Bridge
Creek.
A Gills Bridge Creek Stormwater Management Strategy was prepared by Geolink in
December 2009. The management plan identified priority stormwater improvement
actions. Two of the high priority stormwater bio-retention basins, at the end of Akubra
place and behind Hy-tec concrete have been constructed. Further funding is required
to implement other priority stormwater improvement action from the plan.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 67 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 4 ATMOSPHERE
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Air Pollution - is relatively low in the Kempsey Shire compared to larger urban centres, although smoke and other air borne particles can be prevalent during the bushfire season.
Nuisance – Council recorded 22 Air, 18 Odour and 34 Noise complaints during 2010/2011.
Vehicle Emissions – impact most on the urban centres of Kempsey and Frederickton due to heavy traffic on the Pacific Highway.
Burning Off – this is often cause for complaint when waste is burnt in urban areas.
Landfilling – production of methane and other greenhouse gases.
Sewage Treatment Plants – can cause odour problems in urban areas.
Dust – from unsealed roads and unstable development sites.
Sewage Treatment Plants – ongoing odour management.
Climate Change Mitigation.
Investigate air pollution complaints
Cities for Climate Protection Program
Greenhouse Gases
and Climate Change –
Kempsey Shire is regarded as a relatively minor producer of greenhouse gases compared to metropolitan centres, however is not immune to global climate changes.
Fourth Assessment Report released by the IPCC resulted in a unanimous finding within the IPCC that human activity is „very likely‟ to blame for global warming. The Report also indicated that average global atmospheric temperatures could increase by as much as 4oC and sea levels rise by as much as half a metre by the end of the 21st century, if no efforts are made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Energy Use – use of traditional sources of energy such as fossil fuels.
Landfilling – production of methane and other greenhouse gases.
Agriculture – crop and weed spraying, land clearing and methane from stock.
Vehicle Emissions – greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles running on carbon based
fuels.
Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Activities Basix - Basix is a State Government initiative which will continue to be administered by Local Government at the plan lodgement and approval stage. Landfilling - Kerbside recycling program.
Vehicle Emissions - Introducing fuel efficient fleet vehicles.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan – Commence preparations for the development of a Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the Shire. Local Adaptation Program - The program will increase the adaptive capacity of each of the local councils to deal with the impacts of climate change.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 68 - Printed on Recycled Paper
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The atmosphere consists of a relatively narrow shell of air encircling the earth that
supports animal and plant life. Human activity affects the atmosphere in a variety of
ways. Although some of the impacts occur on a global scale, such as ozone depletion
and global warming, the source of these problems are often occurring on a local scale.
The quality of the air in major urban and regional centres is also of concern to the
community and may be associated with a range of adverse health effects (NSW EPA
2000).
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability? And how are they changing?
4.2 CLIMATE
The majority of the Kempsey Shire falls within the warm temperate climatic zone,
however, higher elevations (up to 1560m) to the west experience a cooler, temperate
climate. The climate across Kempsey Shire is strongly influenced by the range of
elevations from sea level to the high country, the distance from the coast and the
latitude.
Indicator – Climate Data
Why use this indicator?
Ongoing review of climate data sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology enables the
identification of trends and any significant variations in weather patterns. Figure 12
provides the average rainfall and temperature conditions from 1882 to 2011.
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Mean
Mo
nth
ly R
ain
fall (
mm
)
Tem
pera
ture
(d
eg
rees C
els
ius)
Average Precip Average Min Temp Average Max Temp
Source: BOM 2011
Figure 12 – Average Temperature and Rainfall for Kempsey
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 69 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
Approximately 60% of the average annual rainfall occurs between the months of
December to April with highest concentrations usually between January and March.
Temperature is strongly influenced by elevation with higher elevations experiencing
considerable lower temperatures during winter months.
An increasing rainfall trend is also apparent towards the coast, with the coastal towns
of Crescent Head and South West Rocks experiencing, on average, approximately 300
to 400 mm more rainfall per year compared to the hinterland towns of Millbank and
Bellbrook.
Temperature range also shows a subtle variation when comparing that experienced on
the coast (South West Rocks) and that experienced inland at Kempsey. The data
showed less variation between maximum and minimum temperatures on the coast,
with South West Rocks, on average experiencing a 7.5oC variation in temperature,
compared with an average 13oC variation for Kempsey.
4.3 AIR POLLUTION
Substances not naturally found in the air or at greater concentrations or in different
locations from usual are referred to as 'pollutants' (NSW EPA 2005). Air pollution is
caused by many of the activities that are common to our way of life. The quality of the
air we breathe can have significant health impacts particularly with regard to
respiratory diseases, asthma and cancer. Air pollutants can also produce odour issues.
Common causes of air pollution can include bushfire, controlled burning, industry,
vehicle emissions, solid fuel stoves and heaters.
4.4 GREENHOUSE GASES & CLIMATE CHANGE
The greenhouse effect is the term given to the natural process whereby energy
originally from the sun (short wave radiation) is reflected from the Earth‟s surface
(long wave radiation) and trapped within the Earth‟s atmosphere by greenhouse
gasses such as carbon dioxide, methane and water vapour. The trapping of this
reflected energy within the Earth‟s atmosphere results in the temperature conditions
presently experienced at the Earth‟s surface. However, this has not always been the
case, with the concentrations of key greenhouse gases naturally fluctuating throughout
the history of the Earth resulting in far different climatic conditions than those
experienced today, ranging from ice ages, to dramatically warmer periods when there
were no ice-caps at all. It is the increase in the concentration of the above mentioned
gases, particularly carbon dioxide and methane, over the past 100-150 years (from
human activities), which has resulted in an enhanced greenhouse effect.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 70 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Figure 13 - Greenhouse Effect Vs the Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
Information contained within the Fourth Assessment Report released by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on a rolling basis throughout 2007 resulted in a unanimous finding within the IPCC that human activity is „very likely‟ to
blame for global warming, „very likely‟ being defined as over 90 percent certainty. The
Report also indicated that average atmospheric temperatures could increase by as
much as 4oC and sea levels rise by as much as half a metre by the end of the 21st
century, if no efforts are made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For further
information on the IPCC‟s Fourth Assessment Report refer to their website
http://www.ipcc.ch.
The Kempsey Shire is a relatively minor producer of greenhouse gases in comparison
to more heavily populated and industrialised areas, particularly as there are no major
fuel-based power generators in the region. However, significant historical land clearing
has reduced the regions current potential as a sink for carbon dioxide. Major sources
of greenhouse emissions in the area are likely to come from bushfires, controlled
burning, forestry, agriculture and transport (particularly the Pacific highway).
4.5 OZONE LAYER
A thin shield of ozone gas, present in the stratosphere, some 20–50 kilometres above
the planet, is responsible for protecting all life on Earth from damaging ultraviolet
radiation emitted by the sun. Ozone is an extremely rare component of the Earth's
atmosphere, making up only three out of every 10 million molecules of air.
When some substances with a high degree of stability are released at ground level,
they can persist long enough to travel up into the stratosphere. Examples include
halocarbons and carbon compounds containing chlorine or bromine. These compounds
are broken down in the stratosphere under the influence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 71 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Through a series of reactions, the chlorine and bromine atoms produced act as
catalysts for reactions which destroy ozone molecules.
The historical use of the ozone depleting compounds such as chlorofluorocarbon
compounds (CFCs) within the Kempsey Shire is expected to be minimal, with the main
source originating from old household items such as aerosol cans, air conditioning
units and refrigerators.
PRESSURE
Why is it happening?
Air quality is generally not considered to be a major issue within Kempsey Shire in the
short term due to the absence of heavy industry in the Shire, relatively small and
dispersed population, good air flow characteristics and large areas of native vegetation
retained in undeveloped lands.
Indicator – Air Pollution Licences for the Kempsey Shire
Why use this indicator?
Licensing provides an assessment of the number and types of potential air polluters in
the Kempsey Shire.
The DECCW did not have current up to date licensing information available at the time
of reporting.
4.6 NUISANCE
Air pollution can give rise to nuisance issues in urban areas, caused by odours or dust
settling on washing etc. Such issues directly affect the quality of the environment in
which people reside. These generally occur where people live in close proximity to
potential sources of air pollution (e.g. STP‟s, landfill, industry, unsealed roads).
Indicator – Number of complaints regarding air pollution
Why use this indicator?
Council records air complaints on an annual basis. This allows an assessment to be
made of the extent of air pollution issues in the Kempsey Shire.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011
Nu
mb
er
of
Co
mp
lain
ts
Financial Year
Air
Odour
Noise
Figure 14 – Air Pollution Complaints to Council
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 72 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show:
During the 2010/11 reporting period there were 22 general air pollution complaints
received, while there were 18 complaints specific to odour. General air complaint
figures represent an increase from the previous year‟s figure of 12. Odour complaints
have also increased since the previous year‟s figure of 16. Noise complaints have
increased considerably during the 10/11 reporting period when compared to previous
year‟s figures.
4.7 VEHICLE EMISSIONS
Vehicle emissions are not a major issue for local air quality. However, the increasing
amount of traffic and particularly heavy vehicles using the Pacific Highway directly
impact upon the communities located along the highway and the Kempsey Business
District. Increased vehicle numbers adds to carbon monoxide, volatile organic
compounds, lead and other atmospheric particulates in the immediate vicinity of the
highway.
The Pacific Highway bypass will alleviate conditions through much of Kempsey itself,
but completion of this bypass is not expected until mid 2013.
4.8 BURNING OFF
Controlled burning for the purpose of reducing potential bushfire load, along with
backyard or on-farm burning of vegetative refuse and waste add to pollution load in
the atmosphere.
4.9 SOLID FUEL STOVES AND HEATING
Solid fuel stoves and heaters are common in older residential areas. Weather
conditions, inappropriate fuel and poorly located or designed flues can cause smoke
nuisance and odour issues. The smoke from burning wood contains various pollutants
including carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds and fine particulates along with
a range of other toxic and odour causing elements.
4.10 AGRICULTURE
Agricultural activities such as crop and weed spraying can have a detrimental effect on
air quality with potential for health issues. A substantial amount of the Macleay
floodplain has been cleared for grazing and other agricultural pursuits, hence removing
potential carbon dioxide sinks. Methane production from intensive stock farming adds
to the greenhouse effect, while also giving rise to potential odour issues.
4.11 LANDFILLING
Landfills produce methane and other gases during decomposition, which add to the
amount of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere. The Kempsey Waste
Receival and Disposal Facility (KWR&DF) is now the only operational landfill in the
Kempsey Shire. Council is required under its NSW EPA licence to monitor methane
emissions to ensure levels escaping the landfill are not above threshold levels requiring
further action. Landfill gas emissions also create odour problems. Council is required
to maintain a buffer zone around the landfill site and cap wastes daily to reduce
potential odour problem. Older non-operational landfills within the Shire would also be
producing greenhouse gases. KSC Landfill has just completed the Planet Footprint and
has shown a marked improvement in emissions.
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 73 - Printed on Recycled Paper
The KWR&DF site is moving towards the newer technologies related to waste handling
and minimisation. These include the new collection contract to divert domestic green
waste from the site and the new smaller 140 litre general waste bin. In addition some
new cover materials are being investigated to save actual land/air space and therefore
eliminate the use of natural resources for day cover.
Indicator – Total Waste to Landfill
Why use his indicator?
The amount of waste going to landfill is directly related to greenhouse gas producing
potential. See Section 6.5.1 – Solid Waste of Chapter 6 – Human Settlements.
4.12 SEWER TREATMENT PLANTS (STP)
STP‟s produce greenhouse gases and can cause potential odour problems when
prevailing winds pass over and direct the odour toward urban areas. The
establishment and maintenance of odour buffers aims to address this issue.
4.13 DUST
Dust pollution issues can be associated with unsealed roads, un-stabilised development
sites, extractive industries and other similar industries.
4.14 BUSHFIRES AND OTHER EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
Bushfires can produce prolonged periods of smoke haze that can have detrimental
health effects for sufferers of respiratory disorders such as asthma. Emergency
situations such as traffic accidents or chemical spills are also of concern in the Shire
due to the high traffic load, and particular road freight, on the Pacific Highway.
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
4.15 INDUSTRIAL AUDITS
Councils Sustainable Development Officers conducted an Environmental Audit of the
South Kempsey Industrial Area. Sixty six businesses were inspected during the
months of August and September 2007.
The purpose of the audit was to gauge the level of compliance with a standardised
check list of seven environmental parameters.
Air pollution was a given parameter and Council‟s Environmental Health Officers
assessed the level of air pollutants leaving the premises in the form of dust, smoke
odour and steam.
Overall results were good for this parameter.
4.16 BASIX – BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY INDEX
Basix is a State Government initiative which is administered by Local Government at
the plan lodgement and approval stage. It ensures homes are designed to use less
potable water and be responsible for fewer greenhouse gas emissions by setting
energy and water reduction targets for new homes, additions and units.
Basix is flexible in that it allows users to meet targets through improved insulation,
passive solar design and orientation. Kempsey Council provides periodic feedback to
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 74 - Printed on Recycled Paper
the Basix division of Planning NSW as part of its mandatory reporting requirements for
the Basix final certificates.
4.17 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION & ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES
4.17.1 Cities for Climate Protection Program
As previously reported in the 2008/09 Comprehensive SoE Report, Council had
completed Milestone 1 and 2 of ICLIE‟S global Cities for Climate Protection (CCP)
Program and was planning to continue its work though the strategic milestone
framework during the 2009/10 reporting period by commencing Milestone 3 –
development of local greenhouse action plan to reduce emissions. However, in May
2009, the Federal Government announced it would no longer be supporting ICLIE with
funding to provide the CCP Milestone Support Program to Councils and without this
funding ICLIE can no longer provide this level of support.
4.17.2 Local Adaptation Pathways Program
In February 2009 the Australian Government – Department of Climate Change
announced Round 2 of the Local Adaptations Pathway was open for applications. The
Local Adaptation Pathways Program provides assistance to local governments to carry
out a risk management process to identify likely impacts of climate change on council
operations and to initiate the development of an adaptation plan (which is separate
from mitigation measures, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions).
The overarching objective of the Program is to increase the adaptive capacity of local
governments to deal with the impacts of climate change and more specifically to:
identify and prioritise risks that climate change impacts pose to the operations and
responsibilities of local governments;
develop strategies for managing risks, adaptive actions, and building resilience
within communities;
identify where knowledge gaps may be and where further investigation is needed;
and
prioritise adaptive actions.
Council officers from Nambucca, Bellingen and Kempsey Shire Council, prepared and
submitted a joint application which successfully received $140,000 to complete a risk
and adaptation reports for the region.
In December 2010 both the Climate Change Risk Assessment and Climate Change
Adaptation Strategy were completed.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done to improve Air Quality and Response to Climate
Change?
As previously discussed in this section air pollution is not regarded as a major
environmental issue in the Shire. However, any means to reduce air pollution should
be considered as the Shire moves toward sustainability.
Reducing point source emissions of pollutants such as odour and dust are important for
improving local air quality within the Shire, but consideration of broader environmental
issues such as reducing Greenhouse gas emissions should be explored.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 75 - Printed on Recycled Paper
4.18 BASIX
Basix will continue to be administered by Local Government at the plan lodgement and
approval stage.
4.19 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION & ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES
4.19.1 Cities for Climate Protection Program
Without technical support from ICLIE, development of local greenhouse action plan has
been put on hold until internal resources can be identified to undertake this project.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 76 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 5 BIODIVERSITY
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Habitats within the Shire – 30 of the 77 ecosystems recorded in the Shire have been identified as being of high conservation value. This incorporates 5,038 ha (or 2.25%) of vulnerable communities and 32,678ha (or 14.31%).
Land Clearing and Development – the population of Kempsey Shire is growing, particularly in the coastal areas and with rural subdivision.
Vegetation Mapping Project - Mapping of eastern and western portion of Shire now both complete.
Koala Habitat Mapping and Management – A CKPoM has been developed with associated koala habitat mapping. The plan has been formally endorsed by DoP and taken effect from 24 May 2011. The plan applies to all development applications proposed within the eastern portion of the Shire koala habitat map.
Implementation of the Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management – The Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management for the eastern portion of the Kempsey Shire has been endorsed by DoP and implementation of the CKPoM commenced in May 2011 and will continue through the upcoming 2011/12 reporting period.
Biodiversity Conservation Strategy – would aim to identify, protect and enhance Kempsey Shire‟s native biodiversity through accessing reliable funds to educate the community about biodiversity issues and values, and also protect, restore and maintain ecosystems and ecological processes through the delivery of on-ground works and planning controls. This strategy has been allocated to a lower priority while other more urgent
strategies are developed. The Biodiversity Conservation Strategy is listed in Councils 2011 - 2015 Delivery Program as an unfunded project.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 77 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Threatened Flora Species – 26 threatened flora species are located within the Kempsey Shire. Four new threatened flora species were identified to occur in the Shire during the 2010/11 reporting period.
Threatened Fauna Species
– 99 threatened vertebrate species are located within the Kempsey Shire. Twelve new threatened fauna species were identified to occur in the Shire during the 2010/11 reporting period.
Threatened Ecological Communities – Ten endangered ecological communities and 10 endangered populations are known to occur in the Kempsey Shire. No new endangered ecological communities were identified to occur in the Shire during the 2010/11 reporting period.
Exotic Plants – Weeds of particular concern in the Kempsey Shire include: aquatic weeds, Groundsel Bush, Giant Parramatta Grass, Bird Lolly weeds, Bitou Bush, Alligator weed Red Lantana and Tropical Soda Apple.
Feral Animals and Domestic Pets – wild dogs continued to be a
major problem in most areas of the Kempsey Shire, while reports of free roaming domestic dogs continue to escalate in semi rural and residential areas as well. Other undeclared invasive animals that are reported to the Mid Coast LHPA include feral deer, feral cats, foxes, rabbits and indian myna birds.
Bushfire – Changing fire regimes have been associated with the decline of many biological communities. The NSW Rural Fire Service (Lower North Coast Zone) indicated local brigades attended 310 incidents across the Kempsey Shire during the 10/11 period, with a total of approx. 1,804 ha hazard reduction burning across the Kempsey/Nambucca Shire.
Weed Management – Council operations targeted: Heavy infestations of Water
Hyacinth and Salvinia were controlled in Council‟s flood drains Salvinia in Belmore River;
Red Lantana and Bird Lolly
weeds; Giant Parramatta Grass
control throughout the Shire;
Education and awareness.
Feral Animal Control – Annual aerial baiting, ground baiting and trapping programs coordinated by Mid Coast LHPA to control wild dogs on Crown land and adjoining private properties have continued. Mid Coast LHPA have also been providing landholders with assistance to control fox and wild dog predation on native fauna and domestic livestock and control rabbit infestations.
Bushfire Management – The Rural Fire Service brigades assisted with a number of hazard reduction burns. Staff also undertook and participated in community fire education programs.
Future Weed Control Program - Ongoing weed control is a priority for Council and as such on-ground
inspections, targeted control programs and landholder and community education will continue throughout 2011/12.
Continued Implementation of Companion Animals Management Plan
Kempsey Wild Dog Management Plan – continue implementation and work with rural residents and stakeholder participants.
Ongoing Bushfire Management - Council will continue to work with the NSW Rural Fires Service in line with the Service Level Agreement to ensure appropriate fire suppression and mitigation activities are undertaken, along with providing appropriate public advice in relation to hazard reduction community education.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 78 - Printed on Recycled Paper
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Biodiversity is the variety of all life forms - the different plants, animals and micro-
organisms, the genes they contain, and the ecosystems of which they form a part.
The level of diversity is not fixed, but rather dynamic, increased by genetic changes
and evolutionary processes, and decreased by extinction and habitat degradation (DEH
2004).
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability? And how are they changing?
5.2 HABITATS WITHIN THE SHIRE
The Comprehensive, Adequate and Representative (CAR) Assessment, completed in
1999-2000 identified the following major vegetation communities existing in the Shire:
sub-tropical, warm temperate and cool temperate rainforest
wet and dry sclerophyll forest
swamp forest
woodland e.g. Melaleuca, Eucalypt and Casuarina spp
scrubland e.g. Banksia and Leptospermum spp
grassland (native and modified) and pasture
wetland, aquatic and marine e.g. saltmarshes, rushlands, mangroves, seagrass,
etc.
dunal communities e.g. littoral rainforest
wet and dry heathland
riparian vegetation
The CAR assessment described 30 of the 77 ecosystems identified in the Shire as being
of high conservation value. This incorporates 5,038ha (or 2.25%) of Vulnerable
communities and 32,678ha (or 14.31%) described as Rare. A detailed list of these
ecosystems is presented in the 2004 Comprehensive SoE Report.
Plate 7: Example of Littoral Plate 8: Intact Section of Riparian Rainforest Vegetation in Upper Gills Bridge Creek
5.2.1 Local Vegetation Mapping
In mid 2006 a broad scale vegetation mapping project, incorporating native vegetation
and candidate endangered ecological communities (EEC) for the eastern portion of the
Kempsey Shire (generally east of the Pacific Highway), showed that approximately
552km2 of the study area was mapped as vegetated with various native forest
ecosystems.
Source: Kempsey Shire Council (2009)
Source: DECCW (2009)
© Michael Murphy
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 79 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Ten candidate EEC‟s were identified in this study, which included:
Coastal Saltmarsh;
Littoral Rainforest;
Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest;
Lowland Rainforest on Floodplain;
Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains;
Freshwater Wetlands on Coastal Floodplains;
River-flat Eucalypt Forest on Coastal Floodplains;
Hunter Lowland Redgum Forest;
Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest; and
Themeda Grassland on Seacliffs and Coastal Headlands.
Broad scale mapping of vegetation communities was extended to include the western
portion (generally west of the Pacific Highway) of the Shire during 2006/07. During
2007/08 a final report and series of maps were produced showing the following Forest
Ecosystem (FE) types identified in the western portion of the LGA:
Central Mid-elevation Blue Gum;
Dry Foothills Blackbutt – Turpentine;
Dry Foothills Spotted Gum;
Dry Grassy Blackbutt – Tallowwood;
Eastern Red Gums;
Escarpment Red Gum;
Foothills Grey Gum – Ironbark –
Spotted Gum;
Grey Gum – Stringybark;
Mid Elevation Wet Blackbutt;
Mid North Coast Wet Brushbox –
Tallowwood – Blue Gum;
Moist Escarpment New England
Blackbutt;
Moist Foothills Spotted Gum;
Moist Open Escarpment White Mahogany;
Northern Wet Tallowwood – Blue Gum;
Open Coastal Brushbox
Paperbark;
River Oak;
Swamp Oak;
Tallowwood;
Wet Bloodwood – Tallowwood; and
Wet Shrubby Brushbox – Tallowwood.
Three of the above mentioned FE types have the potential to represent four different
potential EEC‟s as follows:
Eastern Redgums – may include the EEC, Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest;
Escarpment Redgum – may include the EEC, River-Flat Eucalypt Forest on Coastal
Floodplain; and
Swamp Oak Forest – may include both Swamp Oak Forest and Swamp Sclerophyll
Forest on Coastal Floodplain EEC‟s.
It is likely that further FE‟s and EEC will be added to this list as future detailed, based
plant assessment is undertaken. The areas of plant communities is dynamic over time
with changes due to natural and man-made impacts (such as changing fire regimes
with changing climate and weather events e.g recent wet years following on nearly a
decade of extended dominating dry seasons favours rainforest establishment, clearing
for development such as that required for the new Kempsey Bypass and increased
Source: Kempsey Shire Council (2009)
Plate 9: Foothills Blackbutt -
Turpentine Forest
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 80 - Printed on Recycled Paper
reserve status and changed management practices such as newly gazetted parks and
nature reserves e.g Goolawah NP additions at Crescent Head).
5.2.2 Koala Habitat Mapping
Throughout the reporting period, DoP formally endorsed the Comprehensive Koala Plan
of Management (CKPoM) with associated koala habitat mapping for the eastern portion
of the Kempsey Shire. Council has begun applying the CKPoM to Development
Applications within the mapped koala habitat areas as of 24 May 2011. The koala
habitat mapping identified the following areas of koala habitat within the eastern
portion of the Kempsey Shire:
1,190ha of Primary Habitat;
23,064ha of Secondary (Class A) Habitat;
28,385ha of Secondary (Class B) Habitat; and
23,188ha of „Other Habitat‟ classed as vegetation communities not containing
eucalypts.
(Phillips and Hopkins 2008).
Preferred Koala Food Trees
The koala study underpinning the draft habitat mapping confirmed Tallowwood
(Eucalyptus microcorys), Grey Gum (E. propinqua), Forest Red Gum (E. tereticornis),
Swamp Mahogany (E. robusta), White Stringybark (E. globoidea) and another
Stringybark (E. tindaliae) as the most preferred tree species for koalas inhabiting the
eastern portion of the Kempsey Shire. However, koala activity associated with these
tree species varied greatly across the landscape, with significantly lower activity levels
occurring on erosional and residual soil landscapes (Phillips & Hopkins 2008).
Table 9 - List of Preferred Koala Food Trees in Eastern Portion of Kempsey Shire
Indicator – Extent and Degree of Change to Native Vegetation
Why use this indicator?
The extent and condition of each type of native vegetation correlates closely to the
ecosystems level and ability to maintain biodiversity. By monitoring this indicator we
are able to see how effectively vegetation in the Shire is being managed, and therefore
the associated effects on biodiversity.
What this indicator shows:
A search of the NSW DII Public Register of Plantations Authorised under the NSW
Plantations and Reafforestation Act 1999 revealed that no new plantations were
approved within the Kempsey Shire during the 2010/11.
Data received from DECCW indicated there were two new Conservation Agreements
and three Wildlife Refuges created on land within the Kempsey Shire during the
2010/11 reporting period.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 81 - Printed on Recycled Paper
There were some additional changes made to lands gazetted as National Park Estate in
2010-11. These changes are outlined below:
Table 10 – Name & additional area of land gazetted as National Park Estate in 2010-11
Name Number Area (ha)
Aboriginal Area 0 -
Historic Site 0 -
National Park 4 2997
Nature Reserve 1 39
Regional Park 0 -
State Conservation Area 0 - Source: DECCW 2011 Note: Reserve information has been generated from the National Parks and Wildlife Service Estate GIS layers and includes the National Parks and Wildlife Service Estate as at 30 June 2011. Where a reserve is entirely within an LGA the “total” area is the gazetted area. Where only part of a reserve falls within an LGA the “total‟ area provided is the GIS calculated area and is approximate only.
5.3 VEGETATION CORRIDORS
A wildlife corridor is a link of wildlife habitat, generally native vegetation, which joins
two or more larger areas of similar wildlife habitat. Corridors are critical for the
maintenance of ecological processes including allowing for the movement of animals
and the continuation of viable populations. The Department of Environment and
Climate Change (DECCW 2004) have produced a „Wildlife Corridors‟ information
brochure, a summary of which is presented below.
5.3.1 Why are Corridors Important?
Clearing of native vegetation adds to the formation of fragmented patches or islands of
remaining vegetation. These patches may become increasingly cut-off from other
areas of habitat resulting in many plant and animal species becoming isolated. As
these vegetation patches are reduced in size and become increasingly isolated, the on-
going viability of ecosystems and individual populations of species within them is
severely affected. This ultimately leads to a break down in ecological processes such as
species migration, dispersal, recycling of nutrients, pollination of plants and other
natural functions required for ecosystem health. The likely result is severe biodiversity
decline and local extinction of sensitive species.
5.3.2 Regional Corridors
Regional corridors are primary landscape connections between larger important areas
of habitat. They are generally substantial in width (> 500m) and provide not only for
dispersal of individual species but act as habitat in their own right for a range of
species. Ecological principles indicate that ideally regional corridors should be at least
twice the width of the average home range area of the animal species identified as
potential users of the corridor. Regional corridors typically connect along major
ecological gradients such as altitudinal and/or latitudinal migratory pathways (e.g.
coast to hinterland and tablelands corridors).
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 82 - Printed on Recycled Paper
5.3.3 Sub Regional Corridors
Sub-regional corridors, while not as substantial in width as regional corridors, should
be wide enough to provide landscape connections for species movement and dispersal
(generally > 300m). Sub-regional corridors may not be large enough to provide
substantial species habitat, but be sufficiently wide to cater for a wide range of species
movement and dispersal. Sub-regional corridors typically connect larger vegetated
landscape features such as ridgelines and valley floors.
5.3.4 Local Corridors
Local corridors are smaller, less defined linkages that provide local connection of
remnant patches of vegetation and landscape features such as creek lines, gullies,
wetlands and ridgelines. They may in some cases be less than 50m in width and as
such may be influenced by edge effects. Local corridors are an important component of
an overall regional landscape conservation framework.
5.3.5 Vegetation Corridors in the Kempsey Shire
The most significant regional corridors occur:
along the coast which consist of a relatively continuous stretch of key vegetation;
along the northern portion of the Shire, though is patchy in its distribution and
connectivity;
along the southern portion of the Shire which connects vegetation at the western
portion of the Shire and beyond, to the vegetation along the coast; and
along the western portion of the Shire which connects vegetation to the north,
south and west of the Shire with areas of variable levels of key vegetation and
other similarly significant regional corridors.
5.4 FLORA
5.4.1 General
The broad variety of habitats located in the Kempsey Shire enables this area to
support a large variety of species. In excess of 1,000 different plant species have
been detected in the Shire, from 155 different families. In terms of species richness,
the families Poaceae, Fabaceae, Myrtaceae and Asteraceae contain the greatest
number of species found in the Shire followed closely by Cyperaceae and Orchidaceae.
This list is considered only to be indicative and not comprehensive.
5.4.2 Threatened Flora
Indicator- Threatened Flora species
Why use this indicator?
The conservation status of threatened species
indicates which groups and associated habitat
may need special management. Loss of
species is best shown by the number of
species considered endangered or vulnerable
under the Threatened Species Conservation
(TSC) Act 1995. DEC (2011) provided the
following up to date list of threatened flora
species known to occur within the Macleay
Hastings CMA sub-region.
Plate 10: Suspected patch of Maundia triglochinoides identified in upper Gills Bridge Creek
Source: Kempsey Shire Council (2008)
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 83 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Table 11 - No. of Threatened Flora Species known to occur within the
Kempsey Shire
Species Name Common Name Status
1. Acacia chrysotricha Newry Golden Wattle E1
2. Acronychia littoralis Scented Aconychia E1
3. Allocasuarina defungens Dwarf Heath Casuarina E1
4. Arthraxon hispidus Hairy Jointgrass V
5. Asperula asthenes Trailing Woodruff V
6. Chamaesyce psammogeton Sand Spurge E1
7. Chiloglottis anaticeps Bird Orchid E1
8. Cynanchum elegans White-flowered Wax Plant E1
9. Dendrobium melaleucaphilum Spider orchid E1
10. Diuris disposita Willawarrin Doubletail (Orchid) E1
11. Dirus sp. Aff. chrysantha Byron Bay Diuris E1
12. Grevillea guthrieana Guthrie's Grevillea E1
13. Haloragis exalata subsp. velutina Tall Velvet Sea-berry V
14. Macrozamia johnsonii Cycad (Johnson‟s Macrozamia)* E1
15. Marsdenia longiloba Slender Marsdenia E1
16. Maundia triglochinoides (Maundia)* V
17. Melaleuca groveana Grove‟s Paperbark V
18. Neoastelia spectabilis Silver Sword Lily V
19. Niemeyera whitei Rusty Plum; Plum Boxwood V
20. Parsonsia dorrigoensis Milky Silkpod V
21. Peristeranthus hillii Brown Fairy-chain Orchid V
22. Sarcochilus fitzgeraldii Ravine Orchid V
23. Sarcochilus hartmannii Hartman's Sarcochilus (Orchid) V
24. Senna acclinis Rainforest Cassia E1
25. Thesium australe Austral Toadflax V
26. Zieria lasiocaulis Willi Willi Zieria E1 Notes: E1 = endangered V = vulnerable CE = critically endangered * No common name recorded by Royal Botanical gardens (Sydney) – sourced elsewhere.
What this indicator shows:
Table 11 shows 26 threatened flora species are located within the Kempsey Shire. Four
new threatened flora species were added to the list during the 2010/11 reporting
period.
5.5 FAUNA
5.5.1 General
The broad variety of habitats located in the Kempsey Shire enables this area to
support a large variety of fauna. There are in excess of 460 fauna species from 174
different families (including marine species) recorded in the Shire to date.
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 84 - Printed on Recycled Paper
5.5.2 Threatened Fauna
Indicator - Endangered and Vulnerable Fauna Species
Why use this indicator?
Loss of species is best shown by the number of species considered endangered or
vulnerable under the Threatened Species Conservation (TSC) Act 1995. DECCW
(2011) provided the following up to date list of threatened flora species known to occur
within the Kempsey Shire.
Table 12 - No. of Threatened Fauna Species Known to Occur within the Kempsey Shire
Species Name Common Name Status
Vertebrates
1. Botaurus poiciloptilus Australasian Bittern V
2. Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus Australian Fur-seal V
3. Ninox connivens Barking Owl V
4. Coracina lineata Barred Cuckoo-shrike V
5. Esacus neglectus Beach Stone-curlew E1A
6. Ixobrychus flavicollis Black Bittern V
7. Hamirostra melanosternon Black-breasted Buzzard V
8. Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus Black-necked Stork E1
9. Limosa limosa Black-tailed Godwit V
10. Oxyura australis Blue-billed Duck V
11. Litoria booroolongensis Booroolong Frog E1
12. Grus rubicunda Brolga V
13. Climacteris picumnus Brown Treecreeper (eastern subspecies) V
14. Phascogale tapoatafa Brush-tailed Phascogale V
15. Burhinus grallarius Bush Stone-curlew E1
16. Amaurornis olivaceus Brush-hen V
17. Irediparra gallinacea Comb-crested Jacana V
18. Syconycteris australis Common Blossom-bat V
19. Planigale maculata Common Planigale V
20. Calidris ferruginea Curlew Sandpiper E1
21. Litoria daviesae Davies' Tree Frog V
22. Stagonopleura guttata Diamond Firetail V
23. Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis Eastern Bentwing-bat V
24. Vespadelus troughtoni Eastern Cave Bat V
25. Pseudomys gracilicaudatus Eastern Chestnut Mouse V
26. Falsistrellus tasmaniensis Eastern False Pipistrelle V
27. Mormopterus norfolkensis Eastern Freetail-bat V
28. Nyctophilus bifax Eastern Long-eared Bat V
29. Cercartetus nanus Eastern Pygmy-possum V
30. Dasyurus viverrinus Eastern Quoll E1
31. Petroica phoenicea Flame Robin V
32. Puffinus carneipes Flesh-footed Shearwater V
33. Mixophyes iteratus Giant Barred Frog E1
34. Litoria subglandulosa Glandular Frog V
35. Calyptorhynchus lathami Glossy Black-Cockatoo V
36. Kerivoula papuensis Golden-tipped Bat V
37. Pterodroma leucoptera leucoptera Gould‟s Petrel E1A
38. Tyto capensis Grass Owl V
39. Scoteanax rueppellii Greater Broad-nosed Bat V
40. Litoria aurea Green and Golden Bell Frog E1
Source: KSC (2008)
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 85 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Species Name Common Name Status
41. Chelonia mydas Green Turtle V
42. Litoria brevipalmata Green-thighed Frog V
43. Falco hypoleucos Grey Falcon E1
44. Procelsterna cerulea Grey Ternlet V
45. Pomatostomus temporalis temporalis Grey-crowned Babbler V
46. Pteropus poliocephalus Grey-headed Flying-fox V
47. Pseudomys oralis Hastings River Mouse E1
48. Chalinolobus nigrogriseus Hoary Wattled Bat V
49. Melanodryas cucullata Hooded Robin V
50. Megaptera novaeangliae Humpback Whale V
51. Phascolarctos cinereus Koala V
52. Dermochelys coriacea Leathery Turtle V
53. Miniopterus australis Little Bentwing-bat V
54. Hieraaetus morphnoides Little Eagle V
55. Glossopsitta pusilla Little Lorikeet V
56. Sterna albifrons Little Tern E1
57. Caretta caretta Loggerhead Turtle E1
58. Potorous tridactylus Long-nosed Potoroo V
59. Anseranas semipalmata Magpie Goose V
60. Podargus ocellatus Marbled Frogmouth V
61. Tyto novaehollandiae Masked Owl V
62. Pachycephala olivacea Olive Whistler V
63. Pandion haliaetus Osprey V
64. Grantiella picta Painted Honeyeater V
65. Rostratula benghalensis australis Painted Snipe E1
66. Hoplocephalus bitorquatus Pale-headed Snake V
67. Macropus parma Parma Wallaby V
68. Haematopus longirostris Pied Oystercatcher E1
69. Ninox strenua Powerful Owl V
70. Thylogale stigmatica Red-legged Pademelon V
71. Xanthomyza phrygia Regent Honeyeater E1
72. Ptilinopus regina Rose-crowned Fruit-Dove V
73. Aepyprymnus rufescens Rufous Bettong V
74. Atrichornis rufescens Rufous Scrub-bird V
75. Petroica boodang Scarlet Robin V
76. Tyto tenebricosa Sooty Owl V
77. Haematopus fuliginosus Sooty Oystercatcher V
78. Macronectes giganteus Southern Giant Petrel E1
79. Myotis macropus Southern Myotis V
80. Pyrrholaemus saggitatus Speckled Warbler V
81. Physeter macrocephalus Sperm Whale V
82. Philoria sphagnicolus Sphagnum Frog V
83. Circus assimilis Spotted Harrier V
84. Dasyurus maculatus Spotted-tailed Quoll V
85. Lophoictinia isura Square-tailed Kite V
86. Petaurus norfolcensis Squirrel Glider V
87. Hoplocephalus stephensii Stephens' Banded Snake V
88. Mixophyes balbus Stuttering Frog E1
89. Ptilinopus superbus Superb Fruit-Dove V
90. Lathamus discolor Swift Parrot E1
91. Coeranoscincus reticulatus Three-toed Snake-tooth Skink V
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 86 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Species Name Common Name Status
92. Daphoenositta chrysoptera Varied Sittella V
93. Crinia tinnula Wallum Froglet V
94. Diomedea exulans Wandering Albatross E
95. Monarcha leucotis White-eared Monarch V
96. Epthianura albifrons White-fronted Chat V
97. Ptilinopus magnificus Wompoo Fruit-Dove V
98. Petaurus australis Yellow-bellied Glider V
99. Saccolaimus flaviventris Yellow-bellied Sheathtail-bat V Notes: E1A = critically endangered E1 = endangered V = vulnerable
What does this show?
Table 12 shows 99 threatened vertebrate species occurring within the Kempsey Shire.
Twelve new threatened fauna species have been added to the list during the 2010/11.
5.6 ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES
5.6.1 General
An ecological community is a group of species that occur together in a particular area
of the landscape. For example, there will be a particular group of flora and fauna
species that are typically found in wet, swampy areas and a different group of species
that occur together in dry, arid areas of the landscape.
The survival of each species relies on complex interactions amongst all of the
inhabitants of an ecological community, through biotic mechanisms such as food webs,
mutualisms and pollination, as well as abiotic mechanisms such as water, nitrogen and
carbon cycles. Consequently, the loss of any species may have detrimental flow-on
effects for the ecological functioning of the whole community (DECCW 2009).
In NSW, ecological communities can be listed as Threatened Ecological Communities
under the Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995, in the categories of, Critically
Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable, depending on their risk of extinction.
Ecological communities can also be listed as nationally threatened under the
Commonwealth‟s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999.
5.6.2 Threatened Ecological Communities
Indicator – Threatened Ecological Communities
Why use this indicator?
Loss of ecosystem functionality is best measured by the number of Critically
Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable ecological communities. It displays the impacts
on normal ecological functioning of these communities as a result of environmental
changes. Although the results of the local vegetation mapping projects as described in
Section 5.2.1 indicate a number of EEC‟s potentially occur in the Kempsey Shire,
DECCW (2011) have provided the following up to date list of threatened ecological
communities known to occur within the Kempsey Shire.
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 87 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Table 13- No. of Endangered Ecological Communities (EEC) & Populations (EP) known to occur within the Kempsey Shire
Endangered EEC’s & EP’s Status
1. Beach Stone Curlew (Esacus neglectus ) EP
2. Flame Robin (Petroica phoenicea) EP
3. Little Lorikeet (Glossopsitta pusilla) EP
4. Little Eagle (Hieraaetus morphnoides) EP
5. Gould‟s Petrel (Pterodroma leucoptera leucoptera) EP
6. Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) EP
7. Scarlet Robin (Petroica boodang) EP
8. Spotted Harrier (Circus assimilis) EP
9. Tusked Frog population in the Nandewar and New England Tablelands Bioregions
EP
10. Varied Sittella (Daphoenositta chrysoptera) EP
11. Coastal Saltmarsh in the New South Wales North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions
EEC
12. Freshwater Wetlands on Coastal Floodplains of the New South Wales North
Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions EEC
13. Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest of the New South Wales North Coast Bioregion
EEC
14. Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest of the New South Wales North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions
EEC
15. Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains of the New South Wales North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions
EEC
16. Themeda grassland on seacliffs and coastal headlands in the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions
EEC
17. White Box Yellow Box Blakely‟s Red Gum Woodland EEC & CEEC
18. Littoral Rainforest in the New South Wales North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions
EEC
19. Lowland Rainforest in the NSW North Coast and Sydney Basin Bioregions EEC
20. Themeda grassland on seacliffs and coastal headlands in the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner Bioregions
EEC
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 88 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Notes: EP = Endangered Populations EEC = Endangered Ecological Community under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 CEEC = Critically Endangered Ecological Community under Commonwealth‟s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
Plate 11: Example of Swamp Sclerophyll Plate 12: Coastal Saltmarsh EEC at EEC Forest on Coastal Floodplains Boyters Lane Wetlands, near South
Coastal Floodplains West Rocks
What does this show?
Table 13 shows 10 endangered ecological communities and 10 endangered populations
known to occur in the Kempsey Shire. However, no new endangered ecological
communities have been identified to occur in the Shire during the 2010/11 reporting
period.
PRESSURES
Why is it happening?
5.7 LAND CLEARING AND DEVELOPMENT
Population growth in the region, particularly on the coast, continues to result in greater
demand for development in the region. This causes subsequent pressure on
biodiversity due to land clearing for residential and rural residential developments.
The associated need for greater services in the region such as gas pipes, power lines,
water supply, sewage and new roads causes further pressure on biodiversity.
Indicator - Native Vegetation Clearing
Why use this indicator?
Loss/modification of habitat is one of the most significant key threatening processes.
This indicator shows the amount and rate of native vegetation, and subsequent
habitat, loss in the Shire.
What this indicator shows?
A search of the DECCW‟s „Public Register of Approved Clearing PVP‟s and Development
Applications‟ revealed that no approvals for clearing were granted during the 2010/11
reporting period.
Information supplied by Forest NSW indicated that no harvesting activities of State
Forests occurred within the Kempsey Shire during the 2010/11 period.
Conclusion: Steady
Source: DECCW (2009) Lucas McKinnon
Source: Kempsey Shire Council (2008)
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 89 - Printed on Recycled Paper
5.8 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS PROPOSALS
No significant development applications that will have a significant impact on native
vegetation or biodiversity in the Shire were received during the reporting period.
5.9 FERAL ANIMALS AND DOMESTIC PETS
5.9.1 Feral animals
Feral animals apply a significant amount of pressure on native fauna in the region as
well as having an impact on flora. Some have been listed under the TSC and EPBC
Acts as Key Threatening Processes (KTP‟s). KTP‟s occurring (or likely to be occurring)
in the region in relation to introduced animals include:
Competition and land degradation by feral goats;
Competition and land degradation by feral rabbits;
Predation by feral cats and dogs;
Predation by the European Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes);
Predation, Habitat Degradation, Competition and Disease Transmission by Feral
Pigs;
Competition from feral honey bees;
Predation by Gambusia holbrooki (Plague Minnow or Mosquito Fish).
Indicator – Feral Animals Listing
Why use this indicator?
Feral animals apply a significant amount of pressure on native fauna and flora and
therefore the overall biodiversity in the region. By monitoring the extent and number
of feral animals inhabiting the Shire we are able to see how effectively feral animals
are being managed, and therefore the associated effects on biodiversity.
The newly created Livestock Health and Pest Authorities (LHPA), formally Rural lands
Protection Board (RLPB) are one of the key agencies dealing with feral and pest animal
species in NSW. The Mid Coast LHPA assist and
coordinate the efforts of private landholders to
control declared pest animals, wild dog, fox, rabbit
and wild pigs as required by the Rural Lands
Protection Act 1998 within the Mid Coast LHPA
Management Area, which includes the Kempsey
Shire.
Reports to the LHPA by rate payers of pest animal
activity in the Kempsey Shire area indicate that
the previously recorded levels of wild dog density
remain static at medium/high although stock
losses during the period from October 2010 -
July 2011 have declined.
Other declared invasive animals that are
reported to the Mid Coast LHPA by residents who reside in the Kempsey Shire include
feral deer, feral cats, foxes, rabbits and indian myna birds.
What this indicator shows:
Information provided by Mid Coast LHPA suggests that some species of feral animal
have been reported to be increasing in number and, hence, placing increasing pressure
on biodiversity in the Shire.
Plate 13: Indian Myna Birds are becoming an increasing menace in the Kempsey Shire
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 90 - Printed on Recycled Paper
5.10 EXOTIC PLANTS
Exotic plants threaten nearly all biological communities in Australia. Although weeds
appear to degrade many natural ecosystems, quantitative measures of their impact on
those systems are relatively rare. Introduced plants that result in weed infestations
including noxious weeds and garden escapees are a major threat to biodiversity in the
Kempsey Shire.
Recognised key biodiversity threatening processes that are common in the region are:
Invasion of native plant communities by Bitou Bush and Boneseed
(Chrysanthemoides monilifera); which dominates much of the local coastline,
displacing native flora, and posing a recognised threat to ecological communities
and threatened flora species.
Invasion of native plant communities by exotic perennial grasses.
Indicator – Introduced Species/Weed Control (NPWS)
Why use this Indicator?
Exotic species of particular concern especially in riparian zones include Camphor
Laurel, Willow, Large-Leaved Privet, Small-Leaved Privet, Wandering Jew, Blackberry,
and particularly Lantana, which was by far the most significant weed identified
throughout the LGA, with the exception of the most elevated and remote areas, during
the vegetation mapping exercise.
Exotic species applying the most significant pressure in biodiversity in high
conservation areas of National Parks Estate in the region are Bitou Bush and Lantana
primarily in the coastal region.
NSW DPI provides a list of all the noxious weeds declared in Kempsey Shire, shown in
Table 14 below.
Plate 14: Thick infestation of Lantana in riparian zone of Gills Bridge Creek
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Source: Kempsey Shire Council (2008)
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 91 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Table 14 – List of Noxious Weeds in the Kempsey Shire
Weed Class Weed Class African feathergrass [Pennisetum macrourum]*
5 Hymenachne [Hymenachne amplexicaulis]*
1
African turnipweed [Sisymbrium runcinatum]*
5 Italian bugloss [Echium species] (see Paterson‟s curse)
African turnipweed [Sisymbrium thellungii]* 5 Johnson grass [Sorghum halepense ] 4
Aleman grass [Echinochola polystachya] 2
Alligator weed [Alternanthera philoxeroides] 2 Karoo thorn [Acacia karroo]*
1 Anchored water hyacinth [Eichhornia azurea]*
1
Annual ragweed [Ambrosia artemisiifolia]* 5
Kochia [Bassia scoparia]* except Bassia scoparia subspecies trichophylla
1
Arrowhead [Sagittaria montevidensis]* 5 Kosters curse [Clidemia hirta] 1
Artichoke thistle [Cynara cardunculus]* 5 Lagarosiphon [Lagarosiphon major]* 1
Athel tree [Tamarix aphylla ]* 5
Lantana [Lantana species ]* 5
Leafy elodea [Egeria densa]* 5
Bathurst/Noogoora/Californian/cockle burrs [Xanthium species]
4 Lippia [Phyla canescens]
4
Bear-skin fescue [Festuca gautieri]* 5
Long-leaf willow primrose [Ludwigia longifolia]*
5
Bitou bush [Chrysanthemoides monilifera subspecies rotundata]
4 Mexican feather grass [Nassella tenuissima]*
1
Black knapweed [Centaurea nigra]* 1 Mexican poppy [Argemone mexicana]* 5
Blackberry [Rubus fruticosus aggregate species]* except cultivars Black satin, Chehalem, Chester Thornless, Dirksen Thornless, Loch Ness, Murrindindi, Silvan,
Smoothstem, Thornfree
4
Miconia [Miconia species]*
1
Boneseed [Chrysanthemoides monilifera 4 subspecies monilifera]
Mikania [Mikania micrantha] 1
Mimosa [Mimosa pigra]* 1
Mossman River grass [Cenchrus echinatus]*
5
Bridal creeper [Asparagus asparagoides]* 5
Mother-of-millions [Bryophyllum species and hybrids]
3
Noogoora burr [Xanthium species]
Broad-leaf pepper tree [Schinus terebinthifolius] 3
Onion grass [Romulea species]* Includes all Romulea species and varieties except R. rosea var. australis
5
Broomrapes [Orobanche species]* Includes all Orobanche species except the native O. cernua variety australiana and O. minor
1
Oxalis [Oxalis species and varieties]* Includes all Oxalis species and varieties except the native species O. chnoodes, O. exilis, O. perennans, O. radicosa, O. rubens, and O. thompsoniae
5
Burr ragweed [Ambrosia confertiflora]*
5
Pampas grass [Cortaderia species] 4
Parthenium weed [Parthenium hysterophorus]*
1
Cabomba [Cabomba caroliniana]* 5 Paterson's curse, Vipers bugloss, Italian bugloss [Echium species]
4 Cape broom [Genista monspessulana] 2
Cayenne snakeweed [Stachytarpheta cayennensis]*
5 Pond apple [Annona glabra]*
1
Chilean needle grass [Nassella neesiana] 4 Prickly acacia [Acacia nilotica]* 1
Chinese celtis [Celtis sinensis ] 3 Prickly pear [Cylindropuntia species]* 4
Chinese violet [Asystasia gangetica subspecies micrantha]*
1 Prickly pear [Opuntia species except O. ficus-indica]*
4
Clockweed [Gaura lindheimeri]* 5 Red rice [Oryza rufipogon]* 5
Clockweed [Gaura parviflora]* 5
Rhus tree [Toxicodendron succedaneum]*
4
Cockle burrs [Xanthium species] Rubbervine [Cryptostegia grandiflora]* 1
Columbus grass [Sorghum x almum] 4 Sagittaria [Sagittaria platyphylla]* 5
Corn sowthistle [Sonchus arvensis]* 5 Salvinia [Salvinia molesta] 3
Crofton weed [Ageratina adenophora]* 4 Sand oat [Avena strigosa]* 5
Dodder [Cuscuta species] * Includes All Cuscuta species except the native species C. australis, C. tasmanica and C. Victoriana
5 Senegal tea plant [Gymnocoronis spilanthoides]* 1
East Indian hygrophila [Hygrophila 1 Serrated tussock [Nassella trichotoma] 4
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 92 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Weed Class Weed Class polysperma]*
Espartillo [Achnatherum brachychaetum]* 5 Siam weed [Chromolaena odorata]* 1
Eurasian water milfoil [Myriophyllum spicatum]*
1 Smooth-stemmed turnip [Brassica barrelieri subspecies oxyrrhina]*
5
Fine-bristled burr grass [Cenchrus brownii]* 5 Soldier thistle [Picnomon acarna]* 5
Fountain grass [Pennisetum setaceum]* 5 Spiny burrgrass [Cenchrus incertus]* 4
Gallon's curse [Cenchrus biflorus ]* 5 Spiny burrgrass [Cenchrus longispinus] 4
Giant Parramatta grass [Sporobolus fertilis] 4
Spotted knapweed [Centaurea maculosa]*
1
Giant rat's tail grass [Sporobolus pyramidalis]
3 Texas blueweed [Helianthus ciliaris]* 5
Tropical soda apple [Solanum viarum] 3
Glaucous starthistle [Carthamus glaucus]* 5 Water caltrop [Trapa species]* 1
Golden thistle [Scolymus hispanicus]* 5 Water hyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes] 3
Green cestrum [Cestrum parqui] 3 Water lettuce [Pistia stratiotes]* 1
Groundsel bush [Baccharis halimifolia] 3 Water soldier [Stratiotes aloides]* 1
Hackleberry, Celtis [Celtis sinensis] 3
Harrisia cactus [Harrisia species]* 4 Willows [Salix species]* 5
Hawkweed [Hieracium species]* 1 Witchweed [Striga species]* includes all Striga species except native species and Striga parvilflora
1 Heteranthera [Heteranthera reniformis] 1
Horsetail [Equisetum species]* 1 Yellow burrhead [Limnocharis flava]* 1
Hydrocote [Hydrocotyle ranunculoides] 1
Hygrophila [Hygrophila costata]* 1 Yellow nutgrass [Cyperus esculentus]* 5
Source: Department of Primary Industries (2011)
Notes: Class 1&2 - The plant must be eradicated from the land and the land must be kept free of the plant. Class 3 - The plant must be fully and continuously suppressed and destroyed and the plant may not be
sold, propagated or knowingly distributed. Class 4 - The growth and spread of the plant must be controlled according to the measures specified in a
management plan published by the local control authority. Class 5 - The requirements in the Noxious Weeds Act 1993 for a notifiable weed must be complied with. * - All of NSW declaration.
What this Indicator Shows?
Table 15 shows an updated list of all noxious weeds declared in the Kempsey Shire,
100 in total. Many of these weeds are declared as noxious throughout the entire State
of NSW. Three new weeds were added to the noxious weed list during the 2010/11
reporting period.
5.11 BUSHFIRE
Fire is a natural process to which native animals and plants have adapted to. Groups of
animals and plants that constitute an ecosystem respond similarly to fire according to
the characteristics of their life-history. Many small mammals and most birds breed in
Spring and Summer (commonly the fire period). As burned areas regenerate, different
species find suitable habitat at the various levels of regeneration. Changing fire
regimes have been associated with the decline of many biological communities. The
correct management of fire is thus essential to avoid disruption of ecosystems and
extinction of species.
On 12 January 2011 the Lower North Coast Bushfire Risk Management Plan was signed
by the Bushfire Coordinating Committee. This plan identifies assets, assesses risk and
applies treatments, as required, across all tenures within the Lower North Coast.
The NSW Rural Fire Service (Lower North Coast Zone) indicated local brigades
attended 310 incidents across the Kempsey Shire from 01/07/2010 to 30/06/2011.
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 93 - Printed on Recycled Paper
5.12 DISEASE
Diseases can have a significant impact on biodiversity in the region. DECCW (2011)
has identified the following Key Threatening Processes listed under the TSC Act and
EPBC Act related to disease:
1. Introduction and establishment of Exotic Rust Fungi of the order Pucciniales
pathogenic on plants of the family Myrtaceae;
2. Loss and degredation of native plant and animal habitat by invasion of escaped
garden plants, including aquatic plants;
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
5.13 VEGETATION AND HABITAT MANAGEMENT
5.13.1 General Existing Management Measures
In general, habitat and vegetation is managed by varying authorities depending on the
location of the habitat or vegetation, under provisions of the following main legal
instruments:
Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1978 (EP&A Act)
Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act)
Native Vegetation Act 1997 (NCV Act)
Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
(EPBC Act)
SEPP 44 – Koala Habitat Protection
SEPP 26 – Littoral Rainforest
SEPP 14 – Coastal Wetlands
SEPP 71 – Coastal Zone
National Parks and Wildlife Service Act 1974 (NPWS Act)
Kempsey Shire Tree Preservation Order (2002)
Depending on the area of land, ownership and/or relevant development or other
proposal (if applicable), local (i.e. Council) or State Government Agencies (e.g.
DECCW) may have jurisdiction for administration of provisions under these
instruments to ensure effective management of vegetation. Specific applications of
these instruments are detailed in subsequent sections.
5.13.2 National Parks, Nature Reserves, State Recreation Areas and
other reserves
The DECCW reserve system in the Kempsey Shire includes a number of historic sites,
nature reserves, national parks, and state conservation areas, as shown in Table 16
below.
Table 15 - Reserves in the Kempsey Shire
Name Type Area (Ha)
Clybucca Historic Site Historic Site 482.06
Historic Site Total 482.06
Arakoon National Park National Park 146.00
Carrai National Park National Park 3451.98
Cunnawarra National Park National Park 1.47
Goolawah National Park National Park 546.00
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 94 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Name Type Area (Ha)
Gumbaynggirr National Park National Park 0.11
Hat Head National Park National Park 7391.34
Kumbatine National Park National Park 6707.34
Limeburners Creek National Park National Park 2831.00
Maria National Park National Park 2331.79
New England National Park National Park 34433.06
Oxley Wild Rivers National Park National Park 33.38
Werrikimbe National Park National Park 22.06
Willi Willi National Park National Park 21036.14
Yarrahapinni Wetlands National Park National Park 732.01
Yarriabini National Park National Park 713.00
National Park Total 80376.68
Boonanghi Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 4546.44
Fifes Knob Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 545.88
Fishermans Bend Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 200.00
Gads Sugarloaf Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 477.45
Jobs Mountain Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 50.47
Ngambaa Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 628.23
Pee Dee Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 435.54
Skillion Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 677.70
The Castles Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 2658.89
Willi Willi Caves Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 8.08
Yarravel Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 310.43
Yessabah Nature Reserve Nature Reserve 16.16
Nature Reserve Total 10612.25
Boonanghi State Conservation Area State Conservation Area 1242.46
Carrai State Conservation Area
State Conservation
Area 2460.03
Fishermans Bend State Conservation Area
State Conservation
Area 38.71
Kumbatine State Conservation Area
State Conservation
Area 5.82
Yarriabini State Conservation Area State Conservation Area 9.08
State Conservation Area Total 3756.10
Council reserves also occupy a small area of the region. These reserves are primarily
for recreational purposes.
Indicator - Effectiveness of Formal Reserve System (in accordance with its
comprehensiveness, adequacy and representativeness within the region).
Why use this indicator?
This indicator aims to show both the type and area of habitat conserved within the
reserve system. In Australia this is identified as the main areas implementing
biodiversity conservation. In order to effectively conserve biodiversity the reserve
system must display characteristics of comprehensiveness, adequacy and
representativeness.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 95 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
A total of 21 ha of additional land was gazetted as part of the Goolawah National Park
and Yarriabini National Park in 2010/11. Other changes to parks and reserves during
2010/11 include Arakoon State Conservation Area and Limeburners Creek National
park being changed to National Parks.
The additional land gazetted as part of the Goolawah and Yarriabini National Parks with
further intentions to increase the area of this National Park, represents an increase in
the area of National Parks within the Shire, providing extra protection for biodiversity
within the Shire.
5.13.3 Koala Habitat Mapping and Management
The Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management (CKPoM) for the eastern portion of the
Kempsey Shire LGA, was finalised and formally endorsed by Council in January 2011.
Final approval of the plan was given by the Director General of the NSW Department of
Planning on 25 March 2011. Council commenced the implementation of the CKPoM on
24 May 2011. Any development proposals submitted to Council (after 24 May 2011
and situated within the koala habitat map), that require the removal of native
vegetation will require consultation of the CKPoM to determine which provisions of the
plan are applicable to the development. Council will update the koala habitat map as
any new areas of core koala habitat are identified during assessments carried out in
accordance with the CKPoM. Council plans to begin implementing the management
provisions of the CKPoM during 2011/2012.
5.14 ASSESSMENTS AND RESTORATION ORDERS
5.14.1 Threatened Species Assessments
For any development proposal that falls under the provisions of the EP&A Act, Council
routinely requests flora and fauna impact assessments for threatened species listed
under the TSC Act and EPBC Act, and for consideration of Matters of National
Environmental Significance (which predominantly relates to migratory species listed
under international agreements).
5.14.2 Clean Up Notices
There were two Clean-up Notices issued under Section 91 of Protection of the
Environment Operations (POE) Act 1997 during the reporting period. Both clean up
notices were in respect to the clean up of asbestos associated with fire damaged
buildings.
5.15 EXOTIC ANIMAL CONTROL
5.15.1 Vertebrate Pests
Mid Coast Livestock Health and Pest Authority (LHPA) have a vertebrate pest
management plan for each declared pest species and a Kempsey Wild Dog
Management Plan for the strategic coordinated control of wild dogs for stakeholders
who manage private land, along with National Parks and State Forests within the
Kempsey Shire LGA. Annual aerial baiting, ground baiting and trapping programs are
also coordinated by Mid Coast LHPA to control wild dogs on crown land and adjoining
private properties. Increased requests for assistance to prevent livestock losses and
attacks on domestic pets by wild dogs have required continued work from rural
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 96 - Printed on Recycled Paper
residents and stakeholder participants of the Kempsey Wild Dog Management Plan
throughout 2010/2011. Landholders in all areas of the Kempsey Shire continue to
reiterate to the LHPA that wild dog control must remain a key priority of the LHPA‟s
activities.
Coordinated strategic control programs have been undertaken during 2011 by local
wild dog control associations, public land managers and the LHPA to reduce stock
losses and suppress wild dog numbers. Complaints regarding the lack of control placed
on domestic dogs by owners in both rural and urban areas are a continuing problem in
most areas.
A significant increase in rabbit numbers has been reported throughout the year as
ideal seasonal condition has increased their ability to reproduce. Favourable seasonal
conditions have seen a corresponding increase in reports of the virus myxomatosis
with infestations of rabbits in many areas reduced.
Reports of fox predation on both native fauna and poultry remain very high in most
peri urban areas were control options are limited due to the restrictions placed on the
use of pesticides.
Other nuisance animals including feral cats and myna birds are reported and request
for assistance to control are redirected to other agencies such as CMA and FAWNA.
Reports of feral deer sightings and subsequent damage reports continue to escalate
each year with requests for assistance referred to the Game Council for further action;
the LHPA has no access to control figures relating to feral deer control in the Kempsey
Shire area.
5.15.2 Companion Animals
On 16 January 2007 Council resolved to develop a Companion Animal Management
Plan and to form a Community Consultative Committee.
A Companion Animal Management Plan was adopted by Council on 15 September
2007. The plan identified ten key issues that the consultative Committee was to action.
During the 2009/10 reporting period the committee met on three occasions. The
meeting focused on:
1. Microchipping;
2. Standard Pound operating procedures;
Companion animal issues were promoted through local media outlets, focusing on
barking dogs and microchipping.
5.16 WEED MANAGEMENT
5.16.1 Council’s Operational Works and Control Programs
This past financial year has been one of change for Weed Management in the Kempsey
Shire. Working along with Mid North Coast Weeds Coordinating Committee
Inc.(MNCWCC) and the constituent member Council‟s innovative approach, produced
the highly thought of Strategic Invasive Weeds Plan 2010-2015.
The NSW Weeds Action Program is a NSW Government initiative under the “NSW
Invasive Species Plan” to reduce the impact of weeds.
This program plans to: identify and manage high risk weed species and entry
pathways; develop and implement early weed detection capabilities, assisting in the
timely detection of new weed incursions; affect a quick response to eradicate or
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 97 - Printed on Recycled Paper
contain new weeds, identify and prioritise weed management programs to where the
benefits are greatest; provide effective and targeted on-ground weed control; increase
community acceptance of and the involvement in effective weed management;
integrate weed management into educational programs; improve the knowledge base
for weed management; monitor progress of the NSW Invasive Species Plan’s
implementation; and encourage the use of cost-sharing arrangements.
A result of this has been the building of several guides and documents. Council now
has a high risk pathways and species list showing the main weeds that will be a
priority within the Shire plus weeds already listed as Noxious.
The most significant event in the past year was the identification of Tropical Soda
Apple (Solanum viarum) (TSA) in the Upper Macleay. The first inspection was 16
August 2010 where Council‟s Weeds Officer, Officers from DPI, MNCWCC, New England
Weeds Authority (NEWA) and Upper Macleay farmers met at a site in Armidale-
Dumaresq known as Lagoon Creek. Farmers in the Kempsey Shire section of the Upper
Macleay said they had this plant on their land as well.
Samples of TSA were sent off to Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens for correct
identification with report coming back to Council saying it was infact Tropical Soda
Apple.
A management plan was put together for this new incursion and funding received
(managed by NEWA) of $30,000 from I&I for control works to take place immediately
and then a further $15,000 from Northern Rivers CMA (managed by MNCWCC).
TSA is spread by cattle, pigs, deer, birds and other animals eating the fruit and also by
water where it is growing along rivers and creeks.
In June 2011 the Macleay Valley experienced a major flood so the future will determine
how this weed will spread or if it has spread into the lower Macleay.
Council has been controlling high risk species and noxious weeds on Council‟s
roadsides and reserves. These include priority noxious weeds such as water weeds
Salvinia and Water Hyacinth, Groundsel Bush, Giant Parramatta Grass, Red Lantana,
Bitou Bush, Mother Of Millions and Bird Lolly Weeds.
All priority weeds are a threat to the Macleay/Kempsey Shire, its parks, roadsides,
reserves and natural bushland areas. Council takes an active approach to control
priority weeds on its high risk pathways.
Belmore River had a minor infestation of Salvinia in its upper catchment, this outbreak
was treated successfully and monitoring will continue for any further occurrences.
Bitou Bush has continually being controlled in coastal reserves and now with
maintenance level controls being undertaken in the north at Middle Head and Grassy
Head and now moving more south to Stuarts Point Beach to control heavy infestations
along the dune system. Control for Bitou has taken place on Council reserves at Hat
Head with the cooperation of National Parks to ensure the programs are completed in a
coordinated approach. Council has been undertaking work funded by NRCMA for a
Bitou TAP project at Crescent Head‟s Big Nobby where reducing and eradicating Bitou
is to allow for the regeneration and growth of native threatened species.
Giant Parramatta Grass control throughout the Shire continued throughout the year.
Spraying programs took place in rural areas, Kempsey and all villages including high
risk pathways at Frederickton, Gladstone, Smithtown, South West Rocks, Hat Head,
Crescent Head, Grassy Head, and Stuarts Point.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 98 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Council held several field days in the Shire for weed education. These events have had
a positive outcome for all involved with information coming back from the community
as well as the attendees. Participants have taken excellent knowledge away with them
to make things better for themselves, their properties and the community.
Council‟s Weeds Officer has continued with annual private property inspections,
inspecting for noxious weed infestations and liaising with landholders for the control of
noxious weeds. These inspections are conducted for both new occurrences and existing
infestations in order to prevent their spread.
5.16.2 Legal Notices
Section 18 Notices Nil
Section 20 Notices Nil
Prosecutions Nil
Penalty Notices issued Nil
There have been no notices served onto landholders in the Shire however the Weeds
Officer is working closely with landholders with infestations of Noxious Weeds to
implement and carry out weed programs, education and options of controlling noxious
weeds within the requirements of the Act. With a positive approach to weed control on
private property and the willingness for Council and landholders to work together to
achieve similar goals, landholders embrace the requirements to control noxious weeds
on property.
5.17 BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT
The Kempsey Rural Fire Service has continued to supply a service to the community
and Kempsey Shire Council in line with the Service Level Agreement; this was
achieved by participating in fire suppression and mitigation, community engagement
and public advice in relation to hazard reduction and development applications.
The community engagement team completed 17 activities across Kempsey Shire
throughout the year. Brigades took part in the state-wide open day, conducted street
walks and held various static displays encouraging fire safety awareness. Members of
the community engagement team also attended conferences and training both locally
and regionally to increase their skills and knowledge in the field of community
education.
In the 2010/2011 year staff received and actioned 14 hazard complaints across the
Kempsey Shire and received and gave advice or bushfire safety authority to 53
development applications. Staff also issued 33 Hazard Reduction Certificates under the
Bushfire Environmental Assessment Code and completed two Review of Environmental
Factors.
Volunteer Rural Fire Service brigades assisted with a total of six hazard reduction
burns encompassing an area of approximately 65 ha and volunteers issued 440
permits during last years bushfire danger period. Overall the agencies compiling the
Lower North Coast Bushfire Management Committee conducted approximately 1,804
hectares of hazard reduction burning across all tenures within Kempsey and Nambucca
Shires.
Local brigades attended 310 incidents across the Kempsey Shire from 01/07/2010 to
30/06/2011. Within those 310 incidents local brigades attended 59 Motor Vehicle
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 99 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Accidents/car fires, four Hazmat‟s, 16 False Alarms, three Transformer fires, two Gas
explosions and eight Structural Fires.
Training was carried out for brigades as per the training program with all targets being
met. Problems are being encountered with a decline in the number of instructors and
assessors at a local level.
Without the dedication of the volunteers and the assistance given by Kempsey Shire
Council to provide plant and equipment as required, the 2010/2011 season would have
been significantly worse.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done?
5.18 KEMPSEY SHIRE COMPREHENSIVE KOALA PLAN OF MANAGEMENT
Implementation of the Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management for the eastern
portion of the Kempsey Shire will continue during the upcoming 2011/12 reporting
period. There are numerous advantages of having a comprehensive plan in place, as
opposed to relying on individual SEPP 44 assessments lodged on an ad hoc basis as
the need arises with development applications. The advantages exist for both koala
conservation and management as well as better informed strategic land use planning
and development decisions.
5.19 EAST KEMPSEY ISLAND LOWLAND RAINFOREST REGENERATION
PROJECT
In July 2009 Macleay Landcare Network received grant funding
from the NSW Environmental Trust to undertake a regeneration
project on East Kempsey Island, located adjacent to the
eastern bank of the Macleay River, north of the Kempsey Traffic
Bridge. The Project aims to:
To improve broad NRM values of biodiversity, water quality,
native vegetation and soil condition.
To establish a site replicating original conditions of
subtropical lowland floodplain rainforest and demonstrating current best practice in
regeneration.
To increase community natural resources activity in Kempsey by providing a
suitably accessible public land project close to town and engaging sustainable
community effort over a long term.
The project is currently in the third and final year of funding.
5.20 IMPLEMENTATION OF REVIEWED COMPANION ANIMAL MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Council at its ordinary meeting of 13 July 2010 resolved to reduce the number of
ongoing committees in favour of a new community engagement arrangement and
focus groups.
Status of key areas identified in Companion Animal Management Plan as at 13 July
2010:
1. Off leash areas and signage – complete report submitted to Council with new
leash free areas determined and operational signage provided – ongoing.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 100 - Printed on Recycled Paper
2. Dog Faeces Management – Committee developed pamphlets and information
was provided in Council‟s newsletter.
3. Feral Animal/Wild Dog Management – Not addressed.
4. Barking Dogs – New policy and work procedure developed by committee,
system is working well.
5. Funding and Grants – Not addressed.
6. Keeping of Domestic Animals other than Cats and Dogs – Not addressed.
7. Pound Procedures – Standard operating procedures developed by the
committee which is ongoing.
8. Problem Pet Owners – Not addressed.
9. Cat/Dog Registration/Microchipping – Developed new procedures, along with
photo system for dog identification on Internet – ongoing.
10. Dangerous Dogs and Restricted Breeds – Not addressed.
5.21 FUTURE WEED CONTROL PROGRAM
Ongoing weed control is a priority for Council and as such on-ground inspections,
targeted control programs and landholder and community education will continue
throughout 2011/12.
5.22 POTENTIAL FUTURE INDIAN MYNA BIRD CONTROL PROGRAM
Council partnered with Macleay Landcare Network and Hastings Landcare to submit a
joint funding application to the NSW Environmental Trust to develop a control program
for Indian Myna Birds in the Macleay and Hastings regions. The grant was successful
in securing funds for the program and a project officer has been employed as of July
2011 to run the program. The program will focus on monitoring the spread of birds,
and establishing local action groups in Indian Myna hot spots to trap and remove the
birds.
5.23 ONGOING BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT
Council will continue to work with the NSW Rural Fire Service in line with the Service
Level Agreement to ensure appropriate fire suppression and mitigation activities are
undertaken, along with providing appropriate public advice in relation to hazard
reduction and community education.
5.24 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION STRATEGY
A Biodiversity Conservation Strategy is needed to ensure sustainable development
occurs, which does not adversely impact or threaten remnant vegetation communities
and the biodiversity contained within them. Such a Strategy would aim to identify,
protect and enhance Kempsey Shire‟s native biodiversity through accessing reliable
funds to educate the community about biodiversity issues and values, and also protect,
restore and maintain ecosystems and ecological processes through the delivery of on-
ground works and planning controls. The Strategy would build upon the vegetation
mapping project and Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management. Council does not
currently have appropriate funding to develop such a Strategy, however it remains a
high priority and as such grant funding opportunities will be pursued.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 101 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 6: HUMAN SETTLEMENTS
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Population– The population of Kempsey Shire from the ABS 2006 raw statistic was 27,387 with the estimated population for 2006 being 28,474.
Population Distribution and Growth– The 2006 census information indicates that while there has been an increase in the total population of the Kempsey Shire there has been a decrease in population of South West Rocks.
Age Distribution – The 2006 census data reveals that 37.2% of the population (10,191 people) in the Kempsey Shire are aged between 25 – 54
years. Compared with 31.5% of the population of Kempsey Shire (8,624 people) being aged 55 and over.
Business Numbers - The Australian Business Register indicated there were an estimated 7,521 business entities operating in Kempsey Shire in May 2007.
Gross Regional Product- Gross Regional Product (GRP) for the Kempsey Shire showed it had increased by 3.3% to $784.1 million in 2005/06.
Income – The 2006 ABS Census data indicates that Kempsey Shire remains an area where median weekly incomes are considerably lower than those in the rest of Australia.
Unemployment – rates decreased from 8.4% in June 2008 to 7.8% in March 2010.
Population Growth and Development – The estimated population of Kempsey is estimated to reach approximately 29,080 residents by 2011.
Aging Population - The Kempsey Shire has an aging
population, which is consistent with other towns and cities on Mid North Coast, which have a much higher percentage of people older than 45 years compared to that of NSW as a whole.
Settlement patterns – Kempsey is the largest urban centre, followed by South West Rocks, while a significant number of people reside in the central rural area of the Shire.
Kempsey Shire ESD Strategy - overarching, broad-scale sustainability plan with the main purpose of setting the framework for the long-term coordinated approach to effective environmental, social and economic management within the Shire.
Planning Controls – LEP 2008 to supersede LEP 1987.
New planning controls & projects:
Various amendments to the Kempsey LEP
LEP Amendment No.99
LEP Amendment No.102
Local Growth Management Strategy (Review of Kempsey Residential Land Release Strategy)
2030 Vision
Pacific Highway Bypass Strategy
Comprehensive LEP in accordance with the STD Instrument Order
Kempsey Flood and Floodplain Management Study
Future Planning Projects –
Local Growth Management Strategy (Review of Kempsey Residential Land Release
Strategy)
2030 Vision
Pacific Highway Bypass Strategy
Comprehensive LEP in accordance with the STD Instrument Order
Kempsey Flood and Floodplain Management Study
See Chapter 2 for more details
Roads –
Local & Regional Roads - Council has the care and control of Dedicated Public Roads consisting of the following road categories:
Local Rural Sealed
Local & Regional Roads - The total lifecycle cost of the existing road network is extensive.
Pacific Highway - Currently traversing through the main CBD area
Roads Asset Management Plan - Council plans to manage the road network by ensuring the road network is maintained at a functional standard or desired level of service.
Asset Management Plans -
Further work has been undertaken to assess the value of work needed to maintain assets to a level that meets community expectations and the result of
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 102 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Roads Local Rural Unsealed
Roads Local Urban Sealed
Roads Regional Sealed Roads Regional Unsealed
Roads
Pacific Highway Bypass – Construction underway.
of Kempsey, the Pacific Highway adds considerably to the traffic flow and congestion problems experienced in Kempsey and Frederickton, particularly during holiday periods.
Rural Roads Contribution Plan – Became effective January 2010.
Pacific Highway Bypass Strategy – adopted May 2011.
this work has lead to the proposal for a general rate increase as outlined above.
Bypass Strategy
Currently in the implementation stage.
Water – Annual water consumption during 2010/2011 is estimated to be approx. 3025 Mega Litres (ML) compared to 3234 ML for 2009/2010.
Drinking Water Quality - The heavy rainfall events and flooding during 2009 and 2011 has impacted on raw water quality. A new Public Health Act is due to commence in 2012.
Drinking Water Quality – A continued focus on raw water source management in all seven water supplies is improving treatment efficiencies with variable raw water quality, post the 2009 floods.
Steuart McIntyre Dam - Better management of the bypass system Steuart McIntyre Dam is now possible with the improved knowledge of and ability to monitor the source water. The nutrient monitoring regime established for the Sherwood borefield was successfully used in the summer months to limit algal growth (predominantly blue-green) within the dam. Gene identification of frequently occurring algae in the Dam is helping manage the taste and odour by-products.
Water sharing plans – WSP for the coastal aquifers and river systems are due to commence in the latter portion of 2011.
Aquifer investigations - The Macleay Coastal Sands aquifer is now the subject of an intense 3 year investigation to determine how this aquifer functions, its recharge mechanisms, the capacity of its storage and the impacts of withdrawals from the storage. This project will conclude by the end of 2011.
Crescent Head - Inline pre-filtering and storage has been scoped and budgeted to replace the hypalon storage Dam at Crescent Head. Temporary trials of the storage system commenced in 2011 and will continue until 2012.
Kempsey - Better management of the borefield land for the Kempsey scheme is being designed to enable the improved protection of the bores in Sherwood.
Sewerage - The treatment of wastewater streams (sewage) is highly regulated and a priority concern for Kempsey Shire Council given the significant environmental implications of poorly functioning sewerage systems.
Sewage Treatment - Sewage Treatment Plants (STP‟s) within the Shire are experiencing an increased loading, which in turn has operational life impacts on this infrastructure. Presently, predominately volumetric increases, not biological or chemical, are being experienced along with cumulative impacts upon the delivery systems to the Sewage Treatment Plants.
Wastewater & Water Reuse Projects - Currently reclaimed water is essentially confined to use on golf courses (e.g. Frederickton & Kempsey) whilst areas of South West Rocks will be supplied with recycled water in 2011/2012.
Sherwood Road Wastewater Treatment Project - It is expected that when expanded to its final capacity in 2012, the scheme will provide a model for other
situations where insufficient land is available for existing on-site septic systems.
Hat Head - Council has adopted plans to increase the Treatment Plant‟s capacity and the detailed design is underway.
South Kempsey – industrial area expansion has been scoped to produce concept designs for sewerage scheme expansion and STP augmentation.
Waste – Total material to landfill for the 2010/11 reporting period was 16,472
Population Growth – increasing population has the potential to increase the
‘Waste into Art’ Program – continued during 10/11.
Kerbside Recycling – further education programs.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 103 - Printed on Recycled Paper
tonnes, representing an overall decreasing trend since 2005.
output of wastes.
Flood Events – one moderate event occurred during the reporting period.
Recycling Activities - Council operates kerbside waste collection service with the addition of green waste collection.
Asset Management Plans - 2011-2015 Infrastructure Delivery Program adopted.
Further Waste Minimisation Planning – divert larger amount of building and construction waste. The „Waste into Art‟ Program will again be run during the 2011/12 reporting period.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 104 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Human settlements are where we live. Cities, country towns and remote rural
settlements all form our human environment. The impact that human society has on
the environment relates to its size, production and consumption, resource use,
technology used to supply goods and services and our effectiveness in preventing or
repairing environmental degradation.
In moving toward sustainability in the Kempsey Shire it is important to consider the
interrelationships with the natural environment in the decision making processes. To
assess the impact that human settlements have on the environment, the following
topics will be addressed: population and urban form, water and energy consumption,
waste and transport use.
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability? And how are they changing?
6.2 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS
The population of Kempsey Shire from the ABS 2006 raw statistic was 27,387 with the
estimated resident population for 2006 being 28,474. Estimates of the resident
population are based on census counts by place of usual residence (excluding overseas
visitors in Australia), with an allowance for net census undercount, to which are added
the number of Australian residents estimated to have been temporarily overseas at the
time of the census.
6.2.1 Population Growth
Indicator – Population Growth
Why use this Indicator?
Population growth, including population distribution and migration, combine with high-
consumption patterns to put stresses on the environment, through increased demand
for land resources and the need to increase infrastructure requirements to support new
and growing human settlements.
What does this show?
The population of Kempsey Shire has increased from 26,889 in 2001 to 27,387 in 2006
(raw ABS statistics), representing a 1.8% increase in population. The estimated
population of Kempsey is estimated to reach approximately 29,080 residents by 2011
(TPDC 2005).
6.2.2 Population Distribution
Changes in population distribution over the Shire have significant implications for the
provision of services (e.g. transport, water and sewerage).
The 2001 Census information indicated that the majority of the population within the
Shire reside in the township of Kempsey (7,984 or 30%) and the coastal township of
South West Rocks (4,359 or 6%). The central rural region, encompassing the large
hinterland areas to the north and south of Kempsey, also represents a large proportion
of the population accounting for 25% (6,788). Updated data on population distribution
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 105 - Printed on Recycled Paper
within the Shire will be known once the population projection study has been
completed.
The 2006 Census information indicates that while there has been an increase in the
total population of the Kempsey Shire there has been a decrease in population of
South West Rocks. The 2006 raw statistics indicated that South West Rocks now has a
population of 3,898.
6.2.3 Age Distribution
The Kempsey Shire has an aging population, which is consistent with other towns and
cities on the Mid North Coast, which have a much higher percentage of people older
than 45 years compared to that of NSW as a whole. The reasons for this trend
includes an influx of retirees, an aging population associated with the baby boomers,
lower birth rates and a higher percentage of younger people moving out of the Shire to
major centres such as Sydney and other large urban areas for education and work.
The 2006 Census data reveals that 37.2% of the population (10,191 people) in the
Kempsey Shire are aged between 25 – 54 years, compared with 31.5% of the
population of Kempsey Shire (8,624 people) being aged 55 and over.
6.2.4 Local Economy
Business Numbers
The most recent Australian Business Register indicated there were an estimated 7,521
business entities (i.e. actively registered for an Australian Business Number or ABN)
operating in Kempsey Shire in May 2007, representing an annual increase of 9.0%
from the number recorded in May 2006.
The number of business entities with ABNs currently registered for GST was 3,483, an
annual increase of 6.7%.
Gross Regional Product
Recently compiled data on the Gross Regional Product (GRP) for the Kempsey Shire
showed it had increased by 3.3% to $784.1 million in 2005/06. Kempsey Shire
contributed 8.7% and 0.2%, respectively, to the gross regional / state products of the
Mid-North Coast region ($9.0 billion) and New South Wales ($319.5 billion) in
2005/06.
With regard to industry, the largest contribution was made by the Manufacturing
industry, with approximately $92.3 million, or 11.8% of the total GRP for Kempsey
Shire. The Retail Trade (8.6%), Health & Community Services (8.5%) and Property &
Business Services (7.5%) sectors were the next highest contributors to the GRP of
Kempsey Shire.
Tourism
The room occupancy rate for all hotels, motels and serviced apartments with 15 or
more rooms in Kempsey Shire was 40.5% in the December Quarter 2006, an increase
of 1.3 percentage points from the occupancy rate recorded in the December Quarter
2005 (39.2%). By comparison, the unit occupancy rate for holiday flats, units and
houses in Kempsey Shire experienced an annual decrease of 10.1 percentage points to
36.4% in the December Quarter 2006, whilst the site occupancy rate for caravan parks
fell by 5.9 percentage points to 34.3%.
The average length of stay in Kempsey Shire in the December Quarter 2006 was 1.3
nights in hotels, motels and serviced apartments and 6.8 nights in holiday flats, units
and houses. The average length of stay in the North Coast Tourism Region were 1.9
nights hotels, motels and serviced apartments and 4.2 nights in holiday flats, units and
houses.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 106 - Printed on Recycled Paper
There was an annual decrease of 13.5% in total takings from accommodation in
Kempsey Shire in the December Quarter 2006 ($3.8 million) from the level recorded in
the December Quarter 2005 ($4.4 million).
For further information on economic figures for the Kempsey Shire and Macleay Valley
Coast please refer to the Kempsey and Macleay Valley Economic Brief, which can be
accessed from Council‟s website at
http://www.kempsey.nsw.gov.au/pdfs07/economicbrief_july07.pdf.
6.2.5 Income
The 2006 ABS Census data indicates that the median weekly income for individuals in
Kempsey Shire is $319, compared with $466 as the median in Australia. The median
weekly household income was $614 in Kempsey Shire compared with $1,027 for
Australia. The median weekly family income was $737 compared with $1,171 in
Australia.
Overall these figures indicate that Kempsey Shire remains an area where median
weekly incomes are considerably lower than those in the rest of Australia.
6.2.6 Employment
At the end of the December 2006 quarter the number of persons employed in the
Kempsey Shire totalled 10,747, which coincided with a 2.9% increase in the size of the
labour force over the same period. No updated data on employment rates was
available in time for the preparation of this report. However unemployment figures are
presented below.
6.2.7 Unemployment Rates
The following figure illustrates unemployment rates for Kempsey and neighbouring
LGAs and “like type” river towns for comparison. Data up to and including the March
quarter 2010 indicates Kempsey‟s unemployment rates have decreased during the
reporting period from 8.4% in June 2008 to 7.8% in March 2010.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Dec-9
8S
ep
-99
Dec-9
9S
ep
-00
Dec-0
0S
ep
-01
Dec-0
1S
ep
-02
Dec-0
2S
ep
-03
Dec-0
3M
ar-
04
Jun-0
4S
ep
-04
Dec-0
4M
ar-
05
Jun-0
5S
ep
-05
Dec-0
5M
ar-
06
Jun-0
6S
ep
-06
Dec-0
6M
ar-
07
Jun-0
7Jun-0
7S
ep
-07
Dec-0
7M
ar-
08
Jun-0
8Jun-0
8S
ep
-08
Dec-0
8M
ar-
10
Un
rmp
loym
en
t R
ate
(%
)
Time (months)
Kempsey
Hastings
Grafton
Greater Taree
Nambucca Heads
Source: Dept. of Employment & Workplace Relations 2011
Figure 15 – Local and Regional Unemployment Rates
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 107 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.3 ROADS
6.3.1 Local & Regional Roads
Kempsey Shire Council provides a road network in partnership with the local
community and the NSW State Government through the Roads and Traffic Authority
(RTA). Council has the care and control of Dedicated Public Roads consisting of the
following road categories:
Local Rural Sealed Roads;
Local Rural Unsealed Roads;
Local Urban Sealed Roads;
Regional Sealed Roads; and
Regional Unsealed Roads.
6.3.2 Pacific Highway Bypass
The final preferred route, comprising a bypass to the east of Kempsey and
Frederickton, was announced in July 2004. In July 2006 a project application was
submitted to the Department of Planning seeking the Director General's requirements
for the environmental assessment of the project under Part 3A of the Environmental
Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The environmental assessment was completed
and publicly exhibited during the early part of 2007/08. The Environmental
Assessment provides a description of the proposed upgrade, the changes to the
existing environment likely to result from the construction and operation of the
upgrade, and how the RTA proposes to mitigate or manage any residual impacts
associated with these changes.
The Kempsey Bypass will be 14.5 km long and involves building a four-lane divided
highway which bypasses Kempsey and Frederickton. It is the first stage of the
approved Kempsey to Eungai upgrade project, which comprises the construction of
about 40 km of four-lane divided highway south of Kempsey to north of Eungai Rail.
Towards the end of the 2008/09 reporting period, the Federal Government announced
that it would provide $618 million for the construction of the Kempsey Bypass. Main
construction commenced in June 2010 and it is expected that the project will be open
to traffic by mid 2013.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 108 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Figure 16 - Pacific Highway Bypass of Kempsey
When completed the bypass will remove significant volumes of traffic from the above-
mentioned urban areas, though will also encourage an increase in the volume of traffic
passing through the Shire.
6.4 WATER & SEWAGE
The centralised urban water supply and wastewater systems throughout the Kempsey
Shire are the responsibility of Macleay Water. Macleay Water is a separate business
unit of Kempsey Shire Council.
6.4.1 Water Consumption
Indicator – Water Consumption in the Kempsey Shire
Why use this indicator?
The extraction of water for human consumption and industry puts pressure on surface
and groundwater resources. Water supply for human use is highly regulated and a
priority function of Kempsey Shire Council. Figure 17 shows Kempsey Shire water
consumption data for the past ten years.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 109 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Total Water Consumption
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
Financial Year
Tota
l Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
ML)
Consumption (ML)
Note: The data displayed in this figure has been adjusted to reflect correct town water consumption for the past 10 years and as such may conflict with data displayed in previous SoE Reports.
Figure 17 – Total Water Consumption
What does this show?
Annual water consumption during 2010/11 is estimated to be approximately 3,025
Mega Litres (ML) compared to 3,234 ML for 2009/10, being a decrease in water
consumption over the reporting period. Although a decrease, the consumption pattern
is still markedly above that for 2008/09 (2,790ML) as it includes water consumption
used for clearing streets of mud and silt post the June flood.
Known consumption patterns continue to be monitored, including the sinusoidal
seasonal variations (9-13Ml winter/summer) and the higher weekend consumptions.
6.4.2 Sewage Treatment
The treatment of wastewater streams (sewage) is highly regulated and a priority
concern for Kempsey Shire Council given the significant environmental implications of
poorly functioning sewerage systems.
Sewage Treatment Plants within the Shire are experiencing increased loadings, which
in turn has operational life impacts on this infrastructure. Presently, predominately
volumetric increases, not biological or chemical, are being experienced along with
cumulative impacts upon the delivery systems to the Sewage Treatment Plants. In this
regard, South West Rocks treatment capacity has been doubled and the design for
capacity upgrades at West Kempsey and South Kempsey STP‟s is underway.
Additionally, EPA‟s effluent quality requirements have been indicated as likely to
increase upon this year‟s review of many Council sewerage scheme licences. Scoping
work for such treatment upgrades will shortly commence for South Kempsey,
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 110 - Printed on Recycled Paper
concurrent with other investigation work. Scoping work for other STP‟s such as
Frederickton and Gladstone will follow in subsequent years.
6.5 WASTE
6.5.1 Solid Waste
Solid waste also called Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is a waste type that includes
predominantly household waste (domestic waste) with sometimes the addition of
commercial wastes, usually collected by local government authority within a given
area.
Indicator –Waste to Landfill
Why use this indicator?
Australia is the second highest producer of waste per capita in the world (second only
to the USA) with most landfill sites filling at an unprecedented rate. As a result, more
and more space is required to dispose of our waste safely. The volume of waste going
to landfill (excluding green waste and recyclables) for the past nine financial years in
the Kempsey Shire is shown in Figure 18 below.
02000400060008000
10000120001400016000180002000022000
2002
/200
3
2003
/200
4
2004
/200
5
2005
/200
6
2006
/200
7
2007
/200
8
2008
/09
2009
/10
2010
/11
Financial Year
Wa
ste
to
La
nd
fill
(T
on
ne
s)
Figure 18 – Volume of Waste to Landfill
What does this show?
Total material to landfill for the 2010/11 reporting period was 16,472 tonnes (17,208
tonnes in 2009/10). Continued education and promotion of kerbside recycling has
contributed to a slight decrease in total waste to landfill over the last 12 months.
6.5.2 Recycling
A kerbside recycling service was introduced across the Kempsey Shire in October
2006. The service has proven to be beneficial to the Shire and has resulted in
significant tonnages being collected and redirected away from the landfill site. In
2010/11, 8,071 tonnes was diverted from landfill.
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 111 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Further initiatives are being implemented to increase the diversion rate including
diversion of kitchen waste to organics recycling. Kempsey Shire is working with the
Midwaste Regional Waste Forum to identify and implement other methods to increase
the diversion rate. Recycling of mattresses, plastic hay wrapping and plasterboard are
being trialled in other Midwaste Forum LGA‟s for possible adoption.
6.6 STORMWATER
Stormwater collection, pollution and Management Plans are discussed in detail in
Chapter 3 – Water.
PRESSURES
Why is it happening?
6.7 POPULATION GROWTH
Population growth places increased pressure on essential services of water supply,
wastewater treatment and waste disposal and/or reuse. It also places pressure on
land resources as is discussed in Section 2.0 – Land, through the need for new
residential subdivisions, industrial land and extractive resources for roads and
construction.
6.8 DEMOGRAPHICS
As outlined earlier in this chapter the Kempsey Shire has an aging population.
Thorough planning is required to ensure adequate age-care services can be provided,
while still allowing for the needs of the broader community to be met, without
compromising environmental health.
6.9 SETTLEMENT PATTERNS
The Shire‟s settlement pattern has largely been determined by historical land uses and
industries, such as, fishing, agriculture and logging in isolated coastal and river towns
and villages. More recently the expanding construction and development industries
have seen consolidation and expansion of some of the larger urban areas, particularly
along the coast. This has resulted in a settlement pattern that ranges from isolated
homesteads and historical rural and riverside villages, to growing coastal towns and
the expanding regional centre of Kempsey. The nature of this settlement pattern has
resulted in relatively independent local communities, located considerable distances
from one another. Although these independent and somewhat isolated communities
have contributed to the Shire‟s diverse culture and heritage, it has placed a
considerable strain on providing and maintaining essential social infrastructure
services, such as roads, reticulated water and sewerage, educational facilities and
buildings of shared interest.
6.10 ROADS
6.10.1 Local & Regional Roads
Council has a duty of care to the community to ensure that the investment in its road
network is managed in the most efficient and cost effective way, from concept
planning to disposal. The lifecycle cost of a road includes the total cost of planning,
design, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation and disposal.
Council‟s unsealed road network has been significantly improved in areas that were
damaged by the flood events in 2009/10. However, continuing investigations indicate
that the condition of the sealed road network is still deteriorating due to inadequate
funding. Council has proposed a General Rate increase to address this issue but the
proposal has not yet been adopted.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 112 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.10.2 Pacific Highway
Currently traversing through the main CBD area of Kempsey, the Pacific Highway adds
considerably to the traffic flow and congestion problems experienced in Kempsey and
Frederickton, particularly during holiday periods. Once constructed, the above
mentioned planned bypass may alleviate some traffic congestion issues in the short
term, but traffic studies reveal that the two lane bridge crossing of the Macleay River
on the Pacific Highway and various intersections with local and regional roads will
remain saturated in the medium to long term.
The construction of a Pacific Highway bypass will see a reduction in passing-through
traffic, which may have separate ramifications for local businesses.
6.11 WATER ACCESSIBILITY
Water supply for the Kempsey Shire is mostly sourced from groundwater. The
Sherwood Borefield, located on a high level terrace of the alluvial flat of the Macleay
River supplies water to the Kempsey District Water Supply Scheme which serves the
towns of Kempsey, Frederickton, Gladstone, Smithtown, the Clybucca region and also
a number of rural properties between Sherwood and South West Rocks. Borefields
within the Macleay Coastal Sands supply water for the coastal towns of Crescent Head,
Hat Head, South West Rocks and Stuarts Point. The towns of Bellbrook and
Willawarrin are sourced from the Macleay Alluvium.
6.12 DRINKING WATER QUALITY
Drinking water quality has been challenged in recent years, going from drought
impacts including algal blooms and careful capacity management to the more recent
2009 and then 2011 floods that compromised raw water quality.
A new Public Health Act is due to commence in 2012 and will place additional quality
requirements upon Council.
Additionally, water sharing plans for the coastal aquifers and river systems are due to
commence in the latter portion of 2011. These water sharing plans are likely to review
Council‟s access to its current water sources, in terms of volume and environmental
impacts.
Council‟s testing protocols, including monitoring of the source water quality ensured
the potable water quality as a whole has been good throughout the Shire within the
reporting period.
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
6.13 ESD STRATEGY
The Kempsey Shire Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) Strategy, as discussed
in Chapter 1.0 – Towards Sustainability, is a broad-scale sustainability plan designed
to facilitate sustainable development within the Shire. The Strategy was developed by
Council in close consultation with a community based steering committee. It provides
a vision for a sustainable future and key goals to work towards, based on community
values identified by the steering committee and confirmed by a comprehensive
community consultation process. Focused on triple bottom line principles, the Strategy
has been designed to serve as an educational resource and reference point for the
development of other plans and policies to ensure Council is working with the
community towards a sustainable future.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 113 - Printed on Recycled Paper
The Strategy was finalised in July 2007, with a number of high priority actions which
have been implemented over the past four years. During early 2011 Council developed
a Delivery Program (2011-2015) and Operational Plan (2011-2012) which incorporated
the priority actions of the ESD Strategy which are to be implemented. The Delivery
Program and Operational Plan began implementation in July 2011.
6.14 NEW PLANNING CONTROLS
Planning controls are and will in future be revised and created to ensure the
sustainability of human settlements within the Kempsey Shire. New planning controls
developed and adopted by Council during the reporting period are shown in Table 16.
Table 16 – New Planning Controls
Policy/Plan Aims/Objectives Progress
LEP Amendment No 59 LEP amendment to rezone land for residential purposes as an urban growth area.
LES Briefs were issued. Landowners currently considering options for
progressing the rezoning.
LEP Amendment No 106 and 108
LEP Amendments to enable the operation of crematoriums,
bush cemeteries, memorial gardens.
Both LEP Amendments have been made by the Minister. It
is likely that Development Applications will be lodged with Council in the near future.
LEP Amendment No 114 LEP Amendment for rezoning
of land in Kempsey, identified in the Residential Land Release Strategy for residential development.
A Planning Proposal has been
lodged with Council and a Gateway approval has been issued. The lot yield is expected to be around 15 lots.
LEP Amendment No 115 LEP Amendment to Rezone
land in South West Rocks to residential. It has been identified in older residential
land release strategies.
A Planning Proposal has been
lodged with Council and a resolution to proceed has been made. Additional
information is being supplied.
LEP Amendment No 116 LEP Amendment to rezone
land for residential use in the Spencerville New Entrance area of South West Rocks.
A Planning Proposal has been
received by Council and is being considered.
Heritage Development Control Plan (DCP)
Implementation of the Community Based Heritage Study undertaken in previous
years. Aims and objective of the DCP is to provide guidance and to encourage sympathetically designed development which will contribute to the conservation of the Shires heritage
resources.
The DCP is expected to be completed in 11/12.
Local Growth Management
Strategy (Review of Kempsey Rural Residential Land Release Strategy)
The aim is to review the
current Kempsey Shire Council Rural Residential Land Release Strategy in accordance with
the Department of Planning “Settlement Planning Guidelines” (August 2007).
The strategy is to be prepared
and completed in 11/12.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 114 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Pacific Highway Bypass Strategy
A Bypass Strategy has been adopted by Council which details actions to mitigate
impacts and take advantage of opportunities created by the Bypass.
The Council has created a position within Council to implement the actions within
the plan. A number of DCP‟s will be created for various precincts along the Bypass corridor.
Comprehensive LEP in
accordance with the STD Instrument Order
The aim is to prepare a Shire
wide LEP amendment in accordance with the STD Instrument Order.
Completion date scheduled
for 2012.
Kempsey Floodplain Risk Management Plan
The aim is to compile updated flood information in order to support a review of Council‟s
Flood Risk Management Policy and to inform zonings in the STD LEP process.
Expected completion date 11/12
6.15 SHIRE PLANNING PROJECTS
(Discussed in section 2.12 Planning Controls and Projects)
6.16 ROADS
6.16.1 Roads Asset Management Plan
Council plans to manage the road network by ensuring the road network is maintained
at a functional standard or desired level of service.
The Roads Asset Management Plan (RAMP) was adopted by Council in February 2008.
Further work has been undertaken to assess the value of work needed to maintain
assets to a level that meets community expectations and the result of this work has
lead to the proposal for a General rate increase as outlined above.
6.16.2 Rural Roads Contribution Plan
Council's Rural Roads Contributions Plan has been superseded by the new Local Roads
and Traffic Infrastructure Developer Contribution Plan 2009. It became effective
from 12 January 2010 and applies to all Council Roads within the Shire Boundary,
other then at South West Rocks, which is covered by the South West Rocks Developer
Contribution Plan.
6.16.3 Pacific Highway Bypass
Construction of the Kempsey Bypass is currently underway. Council meets regularly
with the „Kempsey Bypass Alliance‟ to ensure Council‟s interests are considered during
the construction phase. An „in-house‟ Bypass Project Team has also been formed to
consider all effects of the Bypass once it is operational. This includes economic effects
and planning issues.
6.17 WASTE MANAGEMENT
Development of the Crescent Head Road Waste Management Centre is continuing. A
modified development plan is expected to be submitted to the Office of Environment
and Heritage (OEH) for approval in November 2011. The modified plan allows for the
disposal of waste to landfill for the next 10 years and incorporates improved leachate
control measures.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 115 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Investigations to determine future strategies for development of the Waste Transfer
Stations at Bellbrook, South West Rocks and Stuarts Point are continuing.
6.17.1 Recycling Activities
In April 2009 Council implemented a new kerbside waste collection service. The service
allows better separation of recyclables and green waste at the source and helps
maximise resource recovery. Recyclables are sorted at the Cairncross Resource
Recovery Centre (operated by Port Macquarie-Hastings Council) and green waste is
processed to produce mulch which is sold to industry and the public. Contamination
rates of the kerbside recyclables and greenwaste collections have stabilised at
acceptable levels but education to continue the reduction of contamination is
continuing.
Council also undertook an audit of the residual domestic waste service bins to
determine the level of recyclables that are being placed in these bins which ultimately
goes to landfill. The information gathered from this audit will allow Council to target
education programs to further reduce the volume to landfill.
The „Waste into Art‟ program was again run in 2010 and this was again well supported
by schools in the Macleay Valley.
Council continues to facilitate other recycling education programs through schools.
Arrangements have been made for the Waste Watchers program provided by the Keep
Australia beautiful organisation to visit primary schools in the Kempsey Shire LGA on a
bi-annual basis.
Plate 16: Kerbside Recycling Service
6.18 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The weather-based challenges of supplying good quality water are being constantly
improved within Council. Much of this work has been through necessity, given the
extremes of algal blooms and flood events. Council has learnt from their experiences
of managing such events and have learnt from the experience of other water industry
peers. The various event protocols and the improvement of these protocols has
reduced operational costs and provided better water quality to the customers. For
example, Steuart McIntyre Dam is now usable 10 months of the year instead of 4-5
months and this is an unprecedented result for this Dam‟s algal bloom management,
given there is no water treatment plant. Similarly, the preparation and recovery
processes for a flood event are becoming routine and have been substantially
streamlined. Current coastal aquifer sustainability studies are likely to assist in the
development of protocols for the Hat Head, Crescent Head and South West Rocks
Water supply schemes, which in turn improve customer‟s water quality, Council‟s
efficiencies and environmental management.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 116 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.18.1 Steuart McIntyre Dam
Better management of this storage dam and its bypass system is now possible with the
improved knowledge of and ability to monitor the source water. With this knowledge
an industry standard pumping threshold trigger of 0.05mg/L total nitrogen and
0.05mg/L total phosphorous was used during the summer months to inhibit the algal
growth within the dam. The nutrient levels have been consistently higher than these
thresholds so pumping into the dam can only occur during the cooler months. Nutrient
“build up” and algal levels are also constantly monitored when the dam is online. This
has enabled longer better managed usage of the Steuart McIntyre dam‟s capacity to
supply water within the Kempsey area.
Plate 17: Steuart McIntyre Dam
The nutrient monitoring regime established for the Sherwood borefield was
successfully used in the summer months to limit algal growth (predominantly blue-
green) within the dam. As nutrient levels have been consistently higher than threshold
levels, pumping to the dam can only consistently occur during cooler months. During
algal blooms the dam is off-line and bypassed. The more continuous use at the dam
has the added environmental benefit of reduced power consumption and hence cost
both financially and to the environment in the form of carbon emissions.
Gene identification of the most commonly occurring blue-green algae in Steuart
McIntyre Dam has been undertaken, in conjunction with Port Macquarie Hasting
Council, to improve Council‟s knowledge of the taste and odour by-products occurring
from these species. In turn, this information will assist Council in managing the quality
of water in the dam.
For continual filling (over summer) and usage throughout all the year, a water
treatment plant is required.
Council is further adding to this work by commencing a comprehensive source water
management plan with initial plans being established for the Sherwood Borefield, the
source water for the Steuart McIntyre Dam and Kempsey water supply scheme. This
work commenced in mid 2011 and will continue through to 2012.
6.18.2 Bellbrook
The Bellbrook Water Treatment Plant has been completed and was in operation during
the latter portion of 2010. The treatment plant has managed the various scale river
events, only struggling with the turbidity of the larger flood flows. Investigations into
the security of the bore‟s seals are underway to limit the recurrence of turbidity issues
for this treatment plant. As an added value, the Bellbrook Water Treatment Plant was
able to supply bulk treated water to the Thungutti Aboriginal village, just north of
Bellbrook, when the quality of its raw water from Nulla Creek was compromised in the
high river events.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 117 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.18.3 Willawarrin
Willawarrin‟s water supply has experienced considerable water quality issues post the
2009 floods. These quality issues are due to damaged bore infrastructure enabling
ingress of muddy river water in River freshes. Temporary short term repairs were
undertaken in 2010 which have proved successful during the June 2011 flood. Long
term repairs are being scheduled in the coming months, subject to river levels.
6.19 SEWAGE TREATMENT
6.19.1 Wastewater & Water Reuse Projects
Recent advances in waste water treatment technologies (including membranes) and
their affordability have meant that higher quality effluents are discharged to the
environment and recycled water is being made available to consumers rather than
reclaimed water which requires a significant amount of monitoring and risk
management. Currently reclaimed water is essentially confined to use on golf courses
at Frederickton and Kempsey.
South West Rock‟s new development areas, golf course and oval will be supplied with
recycled water in 2012. The new development areas will use recycled water for toilet
flushing, cold water for washing machines and for outdoor uses.
Opportunities for reclaimed water use from West Kempsey STW are focussed on
agricultural irrigation until augmentation of the sewage treatment plant can offer an
alternative to reclaimed water.
6.20 CIVIC MAINTENANCE TEAM
Kempsey Shire Council‟s Civic Maintenance Team continues to actively maintain
business centres within the Shire to ensure these areas are kept clean and
presentable.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done?
6.21 FUTURE SHIRE PLANNING PROJECTS
(Discussed in Section 2.19 Strategic Planning Projects).
6.22 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANS
Council continues to develop Asset Management Plans for key assets such as Roads,
Bridges and Boatramps.
The 2011-2015 Infrastructure Delivery Program has been adopted and outlines a
proposed 10 year works program between financial years 2011/12 and 2020/21.
The Delivery program is subject to annual review to determine the extent of any
changing priorities.
6.23 BYPASS STRATEGY
The Bypass Strategy has been adopted by Council which details actions to mitigate
impacts and take advantage of opportunities created by the Bypass. The Council has
created a position within Council to implement the actions within this plan.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 118 - Printed on Recycled Paper
6.24 RECYCLING & WASTE MINIMISATION
Education programs will be undertaken to reduce the contamination of recyclables and
green waste at the source.
The „Waste into Art‟ program will continue as raising awareness at the school student
level has proved to be the most effective method of waste minimisation.
New markets are being sought for E-waste, mattresses and crushed glass to further
minimise volumes of waste going to landfill.
6.25 WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
During the 2005/06 reporting period Council adopted the Macleay Water Integrated
Water Cycle Management Strategy (IWCMS). The IWCMS directs the management of
water issues on the basis of best result on a whole of water cycle basis, as opposed to
traditional methods of separately addressing stormwater, water supply and sewerage
issues. The IWCMS offers Kempsey Shire the opportunity to more sustainably manage
its water resources into the future, having a long term view of 30 years with review
period every five years.
During 2007/08 the opportunity to better manage source waters was enabled for the
seven water supply schemes in the Kempsey Shire. Sufficient database information
was available to analyse trends and determine movements and triggers. An example of
this better source water management is a monitoring regime for nutrient levels in the
Sherwood‟s borefield, Steuart McIntyre Dam‟s source raw water. To reduce blue-green
algal blooms and the bloom intensity within Steuart McIntyre Dam a pumping
threshold trigger for nutrients has been implemented during risk months,
predominately summer months. The capabilities to better manage source water will
only improve in the coming years as the depth of available data improves and the
triggers for various characteristics are determined and solution to the arising
challenges are developed.
Similarly, asset database information also became sufficient to determine improved
asset replacement programs. The address of the challenging aged water supply and
sewerage asset systems and substandard past construction will take several more
years.
A progressive condition assessment in combination with age ratings is now prioritising
replacements. Data has indicated that it is often not the oldest infrastructure but
rather poor workmanship and materials in the late 1960s to early 1980s coupled with
insufficient renewals funding that has created a backlog on the replacement program.
6.25.1 Water Supply
Aquifer investigations
The Macleay Coastal Sands aquifer has been the subject of an intense three-year
investigation to determine how this aquifer functions, its recharge mechanisms, the
capacity of its storage and the impacts of withdrawals from the storage. This project
will conclude at the end of 2011.
Crescent Head
Inline pre-filtering and storage has been scoped and budgeted to replace the hypalon
storage dam at Crescent Head. Temporary trials of the storage system commenced in
2011 and will continue until 2012, assessing volumetric aspects and resulting quality
improvements. These results will then assist in defining the work required for detailed
design.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 119 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Kempsey
Better management of the borefield land for the Kempsey scheme is being designed to
enable the improved protection of the bores in Sherwood. Management Plans are
being developed in conjunction with flood protection.
Stuarts Point
A clarifier has been added to the Stuarts Point water treatment plant along with other
improvements to enable enhanced efficiencies.
6.25.2 Future Wastewater & Water Reuse Projects
Sherwood Road Wastewater Treatment Project
A pilot, zero effluent treatment plant has been constructed to service smaller rural
residential allotments at Sherwood Road, Aldavilla. The effluent from septic tanks is
treated within pots containing specific media and plants and then passes through an
evapocycle unit. The facility provides an affordable and sustainable solution to a long-
standing issue. It is expected that when expanded to its final capacity in 2012, the
scheme will provide a model for other situations where insufficient land is available for
existing on-site septic systems.
In mid 2011, the Sherwood Road Wastewater Treatment Project entered Stage 3,
which is the final stage of expansion for this scheme and will see an additional 18
properties added to the system. Those properties are to the north of Ponds Way,
along Sherwood Rd.
A network of stormwater biotreatment swales and conveyance infrastructure provide a
separation of rainwater from the wastewater stream and also contribute to the
improved water quality within the downstream waterways.
Plate 18: Biotreatment swale
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 120 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 7 ABORIGINAL AND NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Aboriginal Heritage – A total of 764 sites are recorded on DECCW‟s AHIMS for Kempsey LGA. Eleven additional sites were identified during the reporting period.
The main pressures facing heritage areas are:
Encroachment by
development
Community
attitudes
Inadequate
education
Inadequate policy
relating to protection of sites
Development of unregistered sites
Natural weathering
and aging process
Lack of economic
resources for appropriate maintenance
Conservation and Planning Controls - All Aboriginal areas/structures within the Kempsey Shire LGA sites are protected under the National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974).
Council continues to update its list and maps of heritage sites as new sites are identified.
Heritage Listed Sites – There are currently 103 local heritage items and 9 state listed sites occurring in the Shire.
State & Federal Heritage Registers - Major European Settlement sites include the Trial Bay Gaol and the Smokey Cape Lighthouse, which are protected under the NSW Heritage Act 1977, while many other sites are listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List, NSE Heritage Act etc. Local Heritage Study - The study identified a number of items and areas of environmental heritage significance, to be nominated for formal protection under the LEP. In response to the Local Heritage Study the KLEP
has been finalised and has been Gazetted by the Minister.
KLEP & Local Heritage Study – Amendments made to Council‟s LEP with Gazettal by the Minister. The LEP now lists unopposed heritage items. This list is changing entity as more heritage items are recognised.
Heritage Development Control Plan - Council is currently undertaking the preparation of a Heritage Development Control Plan (DCP).
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 121 - Printed on Recycled Paper
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Both European and Aboriginal Heritage are important to the Kempsey Shire because it
provides cultural identity and a link to the past to communities and nations. It also
provides opportunities for future generations to gain knowledge and understanding of
their past. By linking our past and present we gain an appreciation of the way we
were, where we've been and where we should be going. Australian history and the
history of the Kempsey Shire can be separated into two distinct areas of Aboriginal and
European (non-Aboriginal) heritage.
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability? And how are they changing?
7.2 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE
Aboriginal culture is a living growing and ongoing event and is deeply linked to the
environment - plants, animals and landscapes. The land and waterways are associated
with dream time stories and cultural learning. It is this cultural learning that links
Aboriginal people with who they are and where they belong. To protect Aboriginal
heritage in Kempsey it is not simply protecting artefacts it is acknowledging that
Aboriginal people need to be able to access land to renew their cultural learning and
most importantly they have to be involved and consulted in the conservation of our
natural environment (DECCW). Aboriginal heritage consists of places and objects that contribute to the story of Aboriginal people in NSW (DoP).
Aboriginal heritage can include places and items that are important to the local
Aboriginal community or to Aboriginal people across NSW both physically and
spiritually. Aboriginal heritage can include natural features such as creeks or
mountains, ceremonial or story places or areas of more contemporary cultural significance such as Aboriginal missions or post contact sites (DoP).
The Kempsey Shire forms part of the territory of the Dunghutti (Thunghutti) people,
which extends from Point Plomer to Macksville, inland to Kemps Pinnacle. Prior to
European settlement of the Shire, this area supported a large and densely
concentrated Aboriginal population.
7.2.1 Identified Aboriginal Sites, Structures and Landscapes
The DECCW (2007), through the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service‟s (NPWS)
Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS), provides a database
that records all known Aboriginal sites in NSW, including the Kempsey Shire.
However, explicit details cannot be provided to Council or to the public due to cultural
and spiritual sensitivity as well as legal requirements.
The DECCW is responsible for the protection and preservation of all Aboriginal objects
and places in NSW. It is illegal to disturb, damage, deface, or destroy an object or
Aboriginal place in the Kempsey Shire without consent from DECCW and the Kempsey
Land Council. There is strict protocol and regulations to be followed in relation to the
authority to disturb or destroy these area or objects.
Council employs an Aboriginal Liaison Officer to assist with establishing links with the
aboriginal community and DECCW in relation to the identification and protection of
objects and/or sites.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 122 - Printed on Recycled Paper
When an Aboriginal heritage site is identified, Council suggests that it be reported to
the Aboriginal Heritage Information Unit of DECCW, so that the appropriate course of
action for conservation, in consultation with the Land Council, can be undertaken.
Indicator - Number and Nature of Aboriginal Sites
Why use this indicator - Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System
(AHIMS)?
The AHIMS provides an assessment of the number and types of identified Aboriginal
heritage sites in NSW and the Kempsey Shire. The following recorded sites and
structures should be regarded as indicative as all sites are possibly not known due to
trust, cultural and spiritual sensitivity. Individual investigation and consultation with
Kempsey Aboriginal Land Council along with DECCW regarding a particular site is
necessary in every instance.
Table 17 - The number and Nature of Aboriginal sites in the Kempsey Shire
Site Feature Number
Previously Recorded
Number Identified
during 2005/2006
Number Identified
during 2007/2008
Number Identified
during 2008/2009
Number Identified
during 2009/2010
Number Identified
during 2010/2011
Aboriginal Resource and Gathering
6 1 0 0
0 0
Aboriginal Ceremony and Dreaming
27 0 0 0
2 0
Art (Pigment or Engraved) 1 0 0 0 0 0
Artefact 318 4 0 5 0 3
Burial 39 1 0 0 0 3
Ceremonial Ring 29 1 0 0 0 0
Conflict 5 0 0 0 0 0
Earth Mound 149 6 0 0 0 0
Fish trap 1 0 0 0 0 0
Grinding groove 1 0 0 0 0 0
Habitation Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hearth 1 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Human Bone and Organic Material
0 0 0 0
0 0
Ochre Quarry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Potential Archaeological Deposit (PAD)
5 0 0 0
0 3
Shell 153 0 0 0 1 0
Stone Arrangement 7 0 0 0 0 0
Stone Quarry 7 0 0 0 0 0
Modified tree (Carved or Sacred)
15 1 0 0
1 2
Water Hole 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 764 14 0 5 4 11
Notes: These figures are for Aboriginal Sites/Places that have been recorded and entered onto Department of Environment and Conservation‟s Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS) till 2010/2011. Some Aboriginal Sites/Places may contain more than one site feature. Source: DECCW (2011).
What does this show?
Eleven additional Aboriginal sites were identified during the reporting period.
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 123 - Printed on Recycled Paper
7.2.2 Disturbance or Destruction of Aboriginal Sites, Structures and
Landscapes
Any disturbance or excavation of land to discover an Aboriginal object, or disturb or
move an Aboriginal object, may need an Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit (AHIP)
under section 87 of the NPW Act 1974 (DECCW). This is a sensitive issue for the local
Aboriginal people and one that requires investigation and compliance with the
requirements of DECCW and consultation with the Kempsey Land Council.
Table 18 - Number of sites altered, destroyed, damaged in 2010-11 in the Kempsey
Shire.
Site Feature Number
Aboriginal Ceremony and Dreaming 0
Aboriginal Resource and Gathering 0
Art (Pigment or Engraved) 0
Artefact 0
Burial 0
Ceremonial Ring (Stone or Earth) 0
Conflict 0
Earth Mound 0
Fish Trap 0
Grinding Groove 0
Habitation Structure 0
Hearth 0
Non-Human Bone and Organic Material 0
Ochre Quarry 0
Potential Archaeological Deposit (PAD) 0
Shell 0
Stone Arrangement 0
Stone Quarry 0
Modified Tree (Carved or Scarred) 0
Water Hole 0
Total 0 Source: DECCW (2011)
7.3 EUROPEAN HERITAGE
Heritage consists of places and objects that the community have inherited from the
past and want to hand on to future generations. Our heritage gives us a sense of living
history and provides a physical link to the work and way of life of earlier generations.
It can enrich our lives and can help us to understand who we are today. The NSW
heritage is diverse and includes buildings, objects, monuments, Aboriginal places,
gardens, bridges, landscapes, archaeological sites, shipwrecks, relics, bridges, streets,
industrial structures and conservation precincts (NSW Office of Environment and Heritage).
7.3.1 Heritage Listed Sites, Structures and Landscapes
Indicator – Number of Sites of Heritage Significance
Why use this indicator?
This indicator provides an assessment of the number and types of identified heritage
items of European heritage significance and will aid in the protection of these sites for
the future. There are State, Regional and Locally listed items and areas in Kempsey
Shire.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 124 - Printed on Recycled Paper
The following Table shows the State Heritage Listed Items under the Heritage Act 1977
(NSW) and contains items listed by the Heritage Council under the NSW Heritage Act.
This includes listing on the State Heritage Register, an Interim Heritage Order or
protected under section 136 of the Heritage Act 1977 (NSW).
It is noted that there are two new additions to the State Heritage list – Trial Bay Gaol
and Pipers Creek Lime Kilns. These do not appear in the Local List as yet but will do
when Kempsey‟s Standard LEP is finalised.
Table 19 – State Heritage Listed Items
Item Name Address Suburb LGA Heritage Act
Bridge Over Five Day Creek
Main Road 75
Armidale Road
Comara Kempsey Yes
Gondwana Rainforest of Australia
World Heritage
Various including Kempsey
Yes
Kempsey Post Office
Belgrave Street Kempsey Kempsey Yes
Kempsey Rail Bridge over the
Macleay River
North Coast railway
Kempsey Kempsey Yes
Smokey Cape Lighthouse Group
South West Rocks
South West Rocks
Kempsey Yes
South West Rocks Pilot Station Complex
5 Ocean Drive South West Rocks
Kempsey Yes
St Andrew‟s Presbyterian Church and Hall
67 Smith Street Kempsey Kempsey Yes
Trial Bay Gaol, Breakwater and Environs
Cardwell Street Arakoon Kempsey Yes
Pipers Creek
Lime Kilns
Kumbatine
National Park Bonnie corner Road
Dongdingalong Kempsey Yes
The following Table lists the sites of Local and Regional Heritage Items and natural
heritage significance identified in the Shire. This list appears as Schedule 1 of the
Kempsey Local Environmental Plan 1987.
Table 20 – Local & Regional Heritage Items
Suburb Item name and State
Heritage Inventory Register No
Address Property
description
Item No
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 125 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Suburb Item name and State Heritage Inventory
Register No
Address Property description
Item No
Arakoon Arakoon Cemetery 1850465
Lighthouse Road Pt Lot 337, DP 754396 and Crown Reserve No 14621
1
Arakoon Local and
Regionally listed
Smoky Cape Lighthouse group 1850129
Lighthouse Road Crown Reserve 2
Arakoon Local and Regionally listed
Arakoon House 1850084
6-8 Russell Street Lot 2, Section 1, DP 758024
3
Arakoon Local and
Regionally listed
Trial Bay Gaol 1850060
Trial Bay Gaol Access Road
Crown Reserve 4
Bellimbopinni Bellimbopinni School 1850360
1194 Pacific Highway
Pt Lot 18, DP 752412
5
Belmore River Belmore River Hall 1850361
615 Right Bank Road
Lot 118, DP 754423
6
Beranghi Local and Regionally listed
Ruins of Gordon‟s Gaol huts, remains of graves and Gordon‟s Jetty
Beranghi Road Lot 1, DP 196559
7
Comara Comara Bridge Armidale Road Bridge over Five Day Creek
8
Comara Comara Cemetery 1850358
Towal Creek Road Crown Reserve No 48945
9
Crescent Head Birralee Hall 1850286
Baker Drive Lot 358, DP 754441
10
Crescent Head Allman Rowe Grave in
Crescent Head Cemetery 1850327
Belmore Street Crown Land 11
Crescent Head O‟Dell Memorial 1850064
Big Nobby Hill (located at end of Skyline Crescent)
Crown Reserve No 65725
12
Crescent Head Crescent Head Primary School 1850059
42-52 Pacific Street
Lots 189 and 252, DP
754441
13
Dondingalong
Local and Regionally listed
Convict Kilns 1850305 Piper‟s Creek
Kumbatine National Park
Reserve 124 14
East Kempsey East Kempsey Public
School
1850348
Cnr Innes and Gill
Streets and
Barnett‟s Lane
Lot 1 and 2,
DP 782300 and
Lot 1, DP 782296
15
East Kempsey War Memorial and The Triangle 1850346
Lord Street Lots 8 and 9, DP 1109013 and road
reserve
16
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 126 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Suburb Item name and State Heritage Inventory
Register No
Address Property description
Item No
East Kempsey East Kempsey Cemetery 1850381
Naiooka and East Streets
Lot 7026, DP 1060502, Lot 7020, DP 1060505 and
Pt Lot 7, DP 754400
17
East Kempsey Chaddies‟ Store 1850345
Cnr Rudder Street and Herborn Lane
Lot 1, DP 511163
18
Euroka Euroka Uniting Church 1850353
235 Euroka Road Lot 10, DP 816589
19
Euroka Former School Residence 1850354
249 Euroka Road Lot 11, DP 603927
20
Euroka Euroka Cemetery 1850356
Euroka Road Lot 11, DP 816589
21
Frederickton War Memorial 1850065
1 Great North Road
Lot 1 DP 122909
22
Frederickton
Local and Regionally listed
Frederickton Public
School group, comprised of: school building, including weather vane and bell tower, headmaster‟s
residence, shelter shed. 1850035
11-13 Great North
Road
Lot 1, DP
122909 and Lot 1, DP 724753
23
Frederickton Cemetery
1850105
15-33 Great North
and Yarrabandinni
Roads
Lot 34, DP
1033470
Yarrabandinni Roads
24
Frederickton Frederickton Hotel (formerly The Macleay Hotel) 1850273
10 Macleay Street Lot 1, DP 749455
25
Frederickton Frederickton Post Office 1850272
14 Macleay Street Lot 4, DP 68179
26
Frederickton Local and Regionally listed
Frederickton School of Arts 1850085
20 Macleay Street Lot 1, DP 68179
27
Frederickton Butter Factory 1850089
1-5 Pacific Highway
Lots 1-3, DP 586074 and Lots 1 and 2,
DP 1071111
28
Gladstone Residence 1850304
25 Barnard Street Lot 3, DP 6003 29
Gladstone Patterson‟s Butchery 1850310
39 Barnard Street Lot 11, DP 6003
30
Gladstone St Barnabas Anglican Church 1850285
8 Darkwater Street
Lot 1, DP 12159
31
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 127 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Suburb Item name and State Heritage Inventory
Register No
Address Property description
Item No
Gladstone Uniting Church 1850131
Darkwater Street Lot 21, DP 810270
32
Gladstone
Local and Regionally listed
Gladstone police
residence and lockup 1850088
2 Kinchela Street Lot 1, Section
1, DP 758444
33
Gladstone
Local and Regionally listed
Police station and
former courthouse 1850071
4-6 Kinchela
Street
Lots 2 and 3,
Section 1, DP 758444
34
Gladstone Gladstone Hall 1850311
5 Kinchela Street Lot 3, Section 1, DP 758444
35
Gladstone Residence 1850277
11 Kinchela Street Lot 1, DP 502145
36
Gladstone Gladstone School and bell 1850278
13 Kinchela Street Lot 1, DP 942984, Lots 8 and 9, Section
3, DP 758444 and Lot 1, DP 942985
37
Gladstone Residence
1850087
18 Kinchela Street Lot 9, Section
1, DP 758444
38
Gladstone Former Cannane‟s Federal store 1850279
19 Kinchela Street Lot 10, Section 3, DP 758444
39
Gladstone Residence (former Commercial Bank) 1850274
20 Kinchela Street Lot 1, DP 254026 and Lot 10, Section 3, DP 758444
40
Gladstone Gladstone Hotel group,
hotel including bell and anchor 1850309
21 Kinchela Street Lot 11, DP
814822
41
Gladstone Residence 1850280
23 Kinchela Street Lot 103, DP 1053792
42
Gladstone Former post office
1850281
27 Kinchela Street Lot 2, DP
667718
43
Gladstone Former insurance brokerage building 1850282
35 Kinchela Street Lot 1, DP 334267
44
Gladstone Residence 1850283
49 Kinchela Street Lot 1, DP 912505
45
Gladstone Residence (former bakery)
1850284
61 Kinchela Street Lot 1, DP 399391
46
Gladstone Memorial Park 1850275
Kinchela Street Public Reserve No 41038, Section 10
47
Gladstone Monument plaques 1850312
Memorial Avenue Road Reserve 48
Kempsey Local and
Regionally listed
National Bank (former AJS Bank) 1850075
3-5 Belgrave Street
Lot 133, DP 786059
49
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 128 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Suburb Item name and State Heritage Inventory
Register No
Address Property description
Item No
Kempsey Knauer‟s building 1850323
7-13 Belgrave Street
Lot 114, DP 602954
50
Kempsey Shopfront
1850324
58 Belgrave
Street
Lot 15, DP
731547
51
Kempsey Shopfront 1850324
60-62 Belgrave Street
Lots 16 and 17, DP 32035
52
Kempsey Railway Hotel 1 850076
91 Belgrave Street
Lot 1, DP 194099
53
Kempsey Kempsey Station group Belgrave, Kemp and Gladstone Streets
Lot 1, DP 1002977 and Lot 2, DP 1010695
54
Kempsey Kempsey Rail Bridge over Macleay River
North Coast Railway
55
Kempsey AJS buggy shed 1850322
Savages Lane Lot 133, DP 786059
56
Kempsey Post office
1850460
3-5 Smith Street Lot 270, DP
752439
57
Kempsey Shopfront (Barsby‟s) 1850320
10-12 Smith Street
Lots 1 and 2, DP 920387 and Lot 141, DP 567944
58
Kempsey Shopfront (Harvey‟s) 1850318
21-25 Smith Street
Lot 352, DP 719106
59
Kempsey Shopfront 1850315
30 Smith Street Lot 155, DP 610592
60
Kempsey Shopfront (displaying “1934”) 1850314
36-38 Smith Street
Lot 1531, DP 858861
61
Kempsey Local and Regionally listed
St Andrew‟s Presbyterian Church and hall 1850130
67 Smith Street Lot 3, DP 707914
62
Kundabung Kundabung Lime Kiln Ruins 1850377
River Road Crown Reserve No 63576
63
Kundabung Kundabung Hall 1850289
River Road Crown Reserve No 63576
64
Millbank Millbank School
1850349
506 Hickeys Creek
Road
Lot 1, DP
122480
65
Millbank Millbank School residence 1850350
506 Hickeys Creek Road
Lot 1, DP 122480
66
Millbank Millbank Hall
1850061
522 Hickeys Creek
Road
Lot 81, DP
746608
67
Sherwood Sherwood Hall 1850339
Sherwood Road Lot 1, DP 312987
68
Sherwood Former Catholic church 1850341
Sherwood Road Lot 46, DP 665898
69
Sherwood Former Sherwood
Public School 1850342
Sherwood Road Lot 62, DP
544847
70
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 129 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Suburb Item name and State Heritage Inventory
Register No
Address Property description
Item No
Smithtown Smithtown Literary Institute 1850387
26 Main Street Lot 219, DP 752412
71
South West Rocks
School of Arts 1850068
1 Gregory Street Lots 235 and 269, DP 754396
72
South West Rocks Local and Regionally listed
Pacific Guest House 1850025
21-23 Livingstone Street
Lot 22, DP 733618
73
South West Rocks
Entrance gates 1850369
Livingstone Street Lot 7041, DP 1120754
74
South West Rocks
Three residences 1850374
27-31 Memorial Avenue
Pt Lot 1, DP 245033 and Lot
1, DP 391779
75
South West
Rocks
Monument stones
1850371
Memorial Avenue Road reserve 76
South West Rocks Local and Regionally listed
Pilot station group 1850052
3-9 Ocean Drive Lot 286, DP 754396 and Lots 373-375, DP 822657
77
South West Rocks
Flagstaff Ocean Drive Lot 284, DP 758919
78
South West Rocks
Monument 1850367
Point Briner Horseshoe
Reserve
Lot 7041, DP 1120754
79
Stuarts Point Kinki Cemetery 1850359
Stuarts Point Road Lot 7005, DP 92622 (Ms 510 Gfn)
80
West Kempsey Kempsey High School 1850106
13 Broughton Street
Lots 1, 2 and 5, Section 16A, DP 759080
81
West Kempsey West Kempsey Cemetery 1850366
Broughton, River and Tozer Streets
Lot 701, Section 20A, DP 759080 and
closed roads
82
West Kempsey Local and Regionally listed
Police residence 1850078
3 Elbow Street Lot 10, DP 48675
83
West Kempsey West Kempsey Post Office 1850094
21-23 Elbow Street
Lot 2, DP 707556
84
West Kempsey English and Scottish and Australian Bank
National Trust Register No.3231 1850095
27 - 29 Elbow Street
Lot 22, Section 6A, DP 759080
85
West Kempsey Former Commercial Banking Company of Sydney 1850079
35 Elbow Street Lot 1, DP 120282
86
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 130 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Suburb Item name and State Heritage Inventory
Register No
Address Property description
Item No
West Kempsey Great Northern Hotel 1850096
38 Elbow Street Lots 1-3, DP 782697
87
West Kempsey
Local and Regionally listed
West Kempsey Hotel
1850074
43 Elbow Street Lot 4, DP
105434
88
West Kempsey
Local and Regionally listed
Grand United Order of
Oddfellows Hall 1850024
22 Kemp Street Lot 13, DP
1045271
89
West Kempsey All Saints Anglican Church and grounds
1850133
28-30 Kempsey Street and 25
Marsh Street
Lots 1 and 2, Section 6A, DP
759080 and Lot 2, (DP unknown), Vol
5743 Fol 166
90
West Kempsey All Saints Catholic Hall 1850271
52-58 Marsh Street
Lot 2, Section 39A, DP 759080
91
West Kempsey Kempsey District Hospital
1850363
River Street Lot 14, Section 23A, DP
759080 and Lots 1-8, Section 20A, DP 759080
92
West Kempsey Local and Regionally listed
Kempsey Court House 1850037
2 Sea Street Lot 11, DP 48675
93
West Kempsey Showground buildings
1850072
19 Sea Street Lot 18, DP
112084
94
West Kempsey Bandbox Theatre 1850388
26 Sea Street Lot 2, DP 421665
95
Willawarrin Willawarrin Hotel 1850333
15-17 Main Street Lot 6, DP 27829 96
Willawarrin St John‟s Catholic Church
18-20 Main Street Lot 1, DP 966704
97
Willawarrin Willawarrin Hall 1850332
26-28 Main Street Lot 1, DP 340896
98
Willawarrin CWA Hall 1850334
29 Main Street Lot 1, DP 120125
99
Willawarrin Willawarrin Public School 1850337
85-91 Main Street Lot 12, DP 813713
100
Willawarrin War Memorial 1850335
Main Street Pt Lot 1, DP 27829
101
Yarrahapinni Yarrahapinni Primary School group
507 Stuarts Point Road
Lot 29, DP 752438
102
Bellbrook Bellbrook Conservation
Area National Trust Registered Urban Village
Land shown black
hatched black on the map marked “Kempsey LEP 1987”
103
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 131 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
There are currently 103 locally listed heritage items and State listed items as a result
of the Community Based Heritage Study. It is noted that the items that are
individually listed on the local table are on a voluntary basis only. Additional areas are
being proposed with the preparation of the Heritage DCP therefore the lists are likely
to continue to grow in the future. Listing of relevant properties on appropriate
heritage registers allows for improved planning and management of these important
places of heritage.
PRESSURE
Why is it happening?
The main activities continuing to place pressure on heritage areas are:
Encroachment by development
Community attitudes both for and against heritage
Inadequate education
Inadequate policy relating to protection of sites
Development of unregistered sites
Natural weathering and aging process
Lack of economic resources for appropriate maintenance
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
7.4 CONSERVATION AND PLANNING CONTROLS
7.4.1 Protection for Aboriginal Heritage Sites
All Aboriginal areas/structures within the Kempsey Shire are protected under the
National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974). Licenses under the National Parks and Wildlife
Act (1974) are required for works, which have the potential to impact on Aboriginal
Heritage either positively or negatively. Licences are required not only for activities
which may destroy, damage or change objects or places, but for the conservation
works of Aboriginal heritage objects as well.
Plate 19: Pilot Station, South West Rocks
Plate 20: Kempsey Post Office
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 132 - Printed on Recycled Paper
7.4.2 Protection for European Settlement Heritage Sites
European heritage sites and structures throughout the Kempsey Shire are protected
under various Registers and Lists e.g. the State Register and local heritage listings and
are protected under the Heritage Act 1977 (NSW) and the Environmental Planning and
Environment Act 1979. For example the Smoky Cape Light House, listed on the State
Heritage Register, Trial Bay Gaol on the Register of National Estate and Bellbrook
Conservation Area is listed by the National Trust.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done?
Council continues to update its lists and maps of Aboriginal and European heritage
sites. New sites become uncovered with new development and redevelopment in the
Shire. The requirement for inspection of new sites by an archaeological consultant in
conjunction with the local Kempsey Aboriginal Land Council aims to ensure that no
sites are disturbed or destroyed. Additionally, the listing of European heritage items
continues to increase with support from the community.
7.5 LOCAL HERITAGE STUDY
A report was submitted to Council in January 2007, whereby Council resolved to
proceed with the amendment to the Local Environmental Plan (LEP) to list unopposed
heritage items. This process has now been completed and the amendment of the LEP
has been completed and appears above or at Schedule 1 of the Kempsey Local
Environmental Plan (KLEP).
7.6 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN
Council is currently undertaking the preparation of a Heritage Development Control
Plan (DCP) to assist in educating the community and offering guidelines to both
preserve and potentially develop and enhance heritage items. This is being
undertaken with support from the Heritage Branch of the Department of Planning.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 133 - Printed on Recycled Paper
CHAPTER 8 COUNCIL’S ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
‘SNAPSHOT’
STATE PRESSURE RESPONSE FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Energy (electricity for buildings etc) Consumption – Reports produced by Planet Footprint show that total energy consumption from Council operated facilities for the 2010/11 financial year was approximately 6,333,056 kWh. This level on energy consumption equates to 22,799 Giga Joules (GJ) of energy, $1,126,090 and 6,532 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.
The trend for the last three years shows an increase in energy consumption, total charges and greenhouse gas emissions.
Population Growth – increasing population growth means greater demand for infrastructure using electricity, particularly water and sewage treatment plants.
Resources – Increasing need for extra staff to cope with workload and thus energy requirements associated with extra office space, computer use etc.
Increasing Energy Prices - further in the coming years. Increases in energy prices place extra pressures on Council‟s limited operating budget.
Monitoring of Electricity Consumption - Further detailed electricity Consumption Service Reports produced for all Council buildings and facilities.
Energy Audit – Council should undertake an energy audit to identify operational areas where energy consumption can be reduced.
Energy (Street Lighting) Consumption - Total annual consumption for street lighting during 2010/11 was recorded as 1,423,611 kWh, equating to 5,125 GJ of energy.
Based on 5,125 GJ of energy consumption, 1,523 tonnes of greenhouse gases were produced from street lighting during 2010/11.
Population Growth – increasing population growth means greater demand for infrastructure using electricity, including street lighting.
Monitoring of Street Lighting Energy Use- Energy Consumption reports produced for all Street lighting in the Shire.
Retrofitting of Inefficient Street Light Bulbs – Council should explore a partnership with Country Energy to retrofit inefficient street lighting bulbs to save on energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Fuel Consumption – Total fuel consumption (including all vehicle fleets) for Kempsey Shire Council for 2010/2011 was approximately 667,171 litres, which equates to 24,927 GJ of energy. Based on total fuel consumption and fuel type used, greenhouse gas emissions for the entire fleet totalled approximately 1,856 tonnes for the 2010/11 financial year.
An overall decrease in fuel consumption, cost and greenhouse gas emissions has been experienced
during the past five financial years compared to previous years.
Shire Area – The large area encompassed by Kempsey Shire Council often requires relatively long travel distances between work sites.
Diverse Range of Operations - Kempsey Shire Council‟s vehicle fleet serves a wide range of purposes and therefore includes a variety of vehicles, from heavy machinery through to light commercial 4WD, and Council sedans and wagons
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Quantified – Baseline greenhouse gas emissions quantified annually.
Appropriate & Regular Servicing – to ensure vehicles are running efficiently and cleanly.
Fuel efficiency - Introduction of smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles.
Continue to commit to purchasing smaller, fuel efficient vehicles with fewer emissions for Council’s Vehicle Fleet – based NSW Clean Car Benchmarks.
Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions -.Council‟s total greenhouse gas emissions have been relatively
Compilation of all of the above pressures.
Greenhouse Report Produced - Measuring the total greenhouse gas
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan - Council should commence preparations for the development of a Local
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 134 - Printed on Recycled Paper
consistent over the past five years.
emissions for the entire organisation is critical to help identify trends and set emission reduction goals in the future.
Greenhouse Reduction Goal - Council endorsed: Medium Term Goals: reduce per capita Council greenhouse gas emissions from 2005 levels by 10% by 2014 Long Term Goals: reduce per capita Council greenhouse gas emissions from 2005 levels by 20% by 2020.
Greenhouse Action Plan designed to coordinate activities to help Council and the Community to achieve the adopted emission reduction goals.
Water Consumption – during 2010/11 Council‟s water consumption accounted for 3.7% (112,129kl) of the total water consumed in Kempsey Shire. Consumption patterns have remained at a constant 3% for three consecutive years. This year‟s consumption is an increase of 26,000kl on what had been a steadied consumption of approximately 86,000kl/annum. The majority of additional consumption is attributed to post flood clean ups.
Population Growth – increasing population means greater demand for additional water and sewerage infrastructure. Basix requirements and star-rated appliances are limiting the impact of population.
Demand management - The change in overall consumption patterns is being monitored to confirm if the dramatic change in total volumes relates to lost behavioural changes or can be directly related to flood impacts and weather variances.
Water Saving Activities - Ongoing assessment of water usage and efficiencies will be conducted on Council premises with ongoing investigations to assess options for reducing water consumption.
Paper Usage – In the 2010/2011 reporting period, Council used approximately 2,956 reams of paper (includes coloured & white paper) at a total cost of $17,035.
Reporting - Increasing reporting procedures require additional paper usage.
Sustainable Choice Program – Council committed itself to this program run by the LGSA, which aims to increase the capacity of Council to buy products with higher sustainability ratings, i.e. contained recycled content, are energy and water saving and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Staff Education – providing education to staff on paper saving tips.
Permanent Switch to Alternative Eco-Friendly Copy Paper – Council should continue to investigate alternative copy paper that is eco-friendly, ideally a copy paper that is made from at least 80% recycled post consumer waste.
Reduce Paper Usage –staff education and awareness of paper usage to be conducted, with the aim of reducing overall paper usage.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 135 - Printed on Recycled Paper
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Following on from the previous State of Environment Reports, this section aims to
address Kempsey Shire Council‟s organisational performance in moving toward
sustainability.
STATE
What are the issues for sustainability? And how are they changing?
8.2 ENERGY CONSUMPTION
While Kempsey Shire Council is not regarded as a major producer of greenhouse
gasses, Council needs to lead by example with regard to reducing greenhouse gas
emission.
Indicator – Council Energy Consumption
Why use this indicator?
Energy consumption in the form of electricity from fossil fuel consuming power plants
produces greenhouse gases. For every kilowatt-hour of electricity produced, a
proportion of CO2 is emitted to the atmosphere. Whilst electricity production occurs
outside of the Kempsey Shire, the impact on the global warming and climate change
directly affects the environment of the region. For the past six years Council has
engaged a contractor, specialising in energy data management to produce regular
service detail reports on electricity consumption for the entire organisation (including
electricity consumed in all Council owned buildings, workshops, and fixtures operated
by Council). Although street lighting makes up part of Council‟s total energy
consumption, it has been separated and reported on separately further below.
Reports produced by Planet Footprint show that total energy consumption from Council
operated facilities for the 2010/11 financial year was approximately 6,333,056 kWh.
This quantity of energy consumption equates to 22,799 Giga Joules (GJ) of energy,
$1,126,090 charges and 6,532 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions as shown in Figure
19 below.
21,467 20,867 21,190 22,167 23,876 22,799
835 851 948 1,056 1,253 1,171
6,079 5,976 6,060 6,326 6,851 6,532
Financial Year2005-2006
Financial Year2006-2007
Financial Year2007-2008
Financial Year2008-2009
Financial Year2009-2010
Financial Year2010-2011
Annual Totals
Energy Consumption (GJ)
Energy Total Charges ($ Thousands)
Energy Greenhouse Gas Emissions (t C02e)
Note: Totals on this graph may not reconcile to totals in graphs below because time-based trend analysis intentionally excludes assets that have substantially incomplete data collection history.
Figure 19 – Total Energy Consumption, Cost and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Council Operated Buildings & Facilities
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 136 - Printed on Recycled Paper
What does this show?
Data for the 2010/11 reporting period shows a decrease in energy consumption, total
charges and greenhouse gas emissions.
Indicator – Street lighting Energy Consumption
Why use this indicator?
In addition to the electricity used in Council operated buildings and facilities presented
above, Council incurs a cost for the running and maintenance of street lighting on
public roads, which also adds to Council‟s overall greenhouse gas emissions.
Total annual consumption for street lighting was estimated at 5,125 GJ for 2010/11.
However, it should be noted that this figure is based on inventories of street lighting
provided by Country Energy.
What does this show?
Estimated consumption from street lighting has remained consistent with that of
previous years.
8.3 FUEL CONSUMPTION
The large area encompassed by Kempsey Shire Council often requires relatively long
travel distances between work sites. Despite the fact that air pollution is not regarded
as a major problem in the Shire, there is potential to reduce greenhouse emissions
through effective management of Council‟s fleet of vehicles. This could range from
continuing to ensure vehicles are running efficiently and cleanly (i.e. appropriate
servicing), minimising kilometres travelled (i.e. via car pooling, work schedules) or by
investigating alternative technologies.
Kempsey Shire Council‟s vehicle fleet serves a wide range of purposes and therefore
includes a variety of vehicles, from heavy machinery through to light commercial 4WD,
and Council sedans and wagons.
Indicator – Council Vehicle Fleet Fuel Consumption
Why use this indicator?
Reporting on the total quantity of fuel used within Council‟s vehicle fleet is essential to
help identify trends over time which can be used to determine the effectiveness of
various fuel reduction programs or improvements in vehicle efficiencies, which have
been introduced.
Total fuel consumption (including all vehicle fleets) for Kempsey Shire Council for
2010/2011 was approximately 667,171 litres, which equates to 24,927 GJ of energy.
Based on total fuel consumption and fuel type used, greenhouse gas emissions for the
entire fleet totalled approximately 1,856 tonnes for the 2010/11 financial year.
Conclusion: Situation Improving
Conclusion: Steady
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 137 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Figure 20 – Council Fuel Consumption, Cost & Greenhouse Gas Emissions
What does this show?
Although an overall decrease in fuel consumption, cost and greenhouse gas emissions
has been experienced from 2005/06 to 2010/11, an increase in all was experienced
during the 2009/10 period. The 2010/11 period had the lowest fuel consumption, cost
and greenhouse gas emissions since 2005.
8.4 TOTAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Compilation of the above data on Council‟s energy use from different sectors enables a
reasonably accurate dataset on which to determine total greenhouse gas emissions
generated by the organisation.
Indicator – Council Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Why use this indicator?
Measuring the total greenhouse gas emissions for the entire organisation is critical to
help identify trends and set emission reduction goals in the future.
Figure 21 below shows Council‟s total greenhouse gas emissions from 2005/06 through
to 2010/11, while Figure 22 shows a breakdown of greenhouse gas emissions by
source for 2010/11.
Note: * Energy is comprised of electricity and gas supply to buildings, water infrastructure and other facilities.
Figure 21 – Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions from All Sources
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 138 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Note: * Energy is comprised of electricity and gas supply to buildings, water infrastructure and other facilities.
The energy figures presented above, differ slightly to those in figure 15 due to rounding. Total for final year shows year-to-date only, up to and including Financial Quarter, 2011-2012.
Figure 22 – Emissions by Source 2010-11
What does this show?
The breakdown shows greenhouse gas emissions from energy supplied to Council‟s
buildings, water infrastructure and other facilities accounts for over 61.6% of Council‟s
total greenhouse gas emissions, and has been increasing over time.
Emissions from fleet and street lighting accounting for 20.9% and 17.2% respectively.
Emissions from waste generated from Council activities account for less then 1% of
Council‟s overall emissions.
The figures above show that although a slight decrease in total emissions was noted to
occur during 2006/07 period, the overall trend is for increasing emissions in total
Council emissions.
The above figures and the way in which Council collects data on greenhouse gas
emissions will continue to be refined over the coming years.
8.5 WATER CONSUMPTION
Extraction of water from the environment for Human Settlements puts pressure on the
natural environment and water resources as has been discussed in detail in Chapter 3
– Water.
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 139 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Indicator – Council’s Water Consumption
Why use this indicator?
Council needs to take a leading role in driving water efficiency within the Kempsey
Shire LGA.
Table 21 shows Council‟s water consumption figures during the 10/11 reporting period.
Table 21 - Council Water Consumption
Water Meters
Total Consumption (kL) 10-
11
Parks, Ovals and Ancillaries 13,341
Water Installations 9,900
Sewer Installations 59,666
Council Buildings/Public Uses 29,222
Total metered consumption - council
operations 112,129
Notes: WATER INSTALLATIONS - All meters connected to water treatment plants SEWER INSTALLATIONS - All meters connected to sewer treatment processes, works, pump stations. COUNCILS BUILDINGS / PUBLIC USES / PARKS, OVALS AND ANCILLARIES - All meters connected to Council buildings, civic centre, baby health centres, halls, libraries, community service buildings, public toilets, swimming pools, parks, sporting fields, cemeteries, fish cleaning tables, BBQ facilities, tennis courts, beach showers.
Figure 23 below shows the trend in Council water consumption over the past 8
financial years.
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
Financial Year
Wat
er
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
kL)
Figure 23 – Council Water Consumption
What does this show?
Table 21 shows Council‟s water consumption figures during the 10/11 reporting period.
When compared with the data of previous years, all areas of Council‟s consumption
have halved over the last two years except for sewer installations. The sewer
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 140 - Printed on Recycled Paper
installations have trebled in the same time. This trebling is believed to be a short term
impact related to consumptions for construction such as concrete curing and some
pump station malfunctions in flood periods, where automatic wash systems were
overloaded due to flows. Most of these malfunctions have been addressed.
Figure 23 above shows the trend in Council water consumption over the past 10
financial years. The graph shows that the reducing consumption has been interrupted
in 2005/06, 2009/10 and 2010/11. The spikes in consumption for 2009/10 and
2010/11 were related to the clean-ups from floods; 2009/10‟s water consumption
being greater due to the four floods experienced compared to the one large flood in
June 2011.
8.6 PAPER USAGE
Indicator – Office Paper Usage
Why use this indicator?
Office paper, particularly in Australia is typically sourced from forestry resources,
although more suppliers are now offering office paper containing a certain percentage
of recycled content. Paper production that solely relies on forestry resources,
particularly on remnant vegetation is unsustainable in the longer term due to the
significant environmental problems associated with forest clearing.
In the 2010/11 reporting period, Council used approximately 2956 reams of paper (A4
White – 2670, A4 Colour – 244, A3 White - 42) at a total cost of $17,035.00
What does this show?
In the 2009/10 reporting period, staff education on paper saving tips has resulted in a
saving of 540 reams of paper and a total cost reduction of $3,325.25. The 2010/11
reporting period has seen an increase in paper usage with Council using an additional
436 reams than the previous year at a cost of $2511.36.
PRESSURE
Why is it happening?
8.7 BUDGET
The following table presents an update of Kempsey Shire Councils total operational and
capital expenditure for the last financial year in comparison to the 6 previous financial
years:
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Conclusion: Pressure Increasing
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 141 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Table 22 - Kempsey Shire Council Budget Summary
What does this show?
Council‟s 2010/11 budget continued to be impacted by the world economic downturn
leading to a reduction in development activity and in turn an adverse impact on
Council‟s income stream whilst the rate pegging approved 2.6% increase fails to match
increases in operating expenses. Council‟s General Fund budget was focused on the
maintenance activity particularly road asset‟s, the capital works program has been
largely curtailed aligned with a strategy to reduce loan borrowings over the longer
term. Major capital works in the Water and Sewer Funds financed in the main from
loan borrowings will result in an increase in the debt service ratio‟s over the coming
years.
8.8 INCREASING POPULATION AND SERVICE DEMANDS
An increasing Shire population and rising community expectations for desired levels
and types of service ultimately means increases in demands on both the budgetary
and staff resources within Council.
Early in the 2008/09 financial year Kempsey Shire Council commissioned a random
community survey of 300 residents in an effort to assess the priorities of the
community and their attitude to Council‟s performance. The 2008 Community Survey
was conducted by Micromex Research using a structure questionnaire, developed in
conjunction with Council Officers, and administered on a computer aided telephone
system. The survey was conducted in accordance with IQCA (Interview Quality Control
Australia) Standards and the Market Research Society code of Professional Conduct. It
was based on a quadrant formula which enabled analysis of Council‟s service in key
areas, such as Community Facilities, Infrastructure, Human Services, and Corporate
Services and Management, to be ranked according to the importance and level of
satisfaction to survey participants. This format also enabled Micromex to compare
Council‟s performance in key areas with that of other Councils.
The key findings of the survey were:
Using quadrant and gap analysis, priority scores were developed for 39 Council
services/facilities with the highest priorities ranked as follows:
Community safety and law and order initiatives;
Rural roads;
Financial management;
Town roads;
Public toilets;
Land use planning;
Expenditure ($) Revenue ($)
Financial
Year
Operating Capital Total Operating Capital Total
2003/04 39,163,254 28,116,757 67,280,011 43,165,780 24,054,170 67,219,950 2004/05 41,350,968 19,384,582 60,735,550 42,651,870 18,104,087 60,755,957 2005/06 43,975,021 20,176,756 64,151,777 44,382,315 19,575,543 63,957,858 2006/07 47,812,449 20,395,741 68,208,190 48,883,508 19,411,383 68,294,891
2007/08 49,852,487 34,153,707 84,006,194 51,144,228 32,912,261 84,056,489 2008/09 50,419,585 29,811,347 80,230,932 53,580,264 16,624,523 70,204,787
2009/10 2010/11
46,089,851 53,484,413
30,088,506 20,656,988
76,178,357 74,141,401
48,060,413 47,563,927
18,441,367 11,172,776
66,501,780 58,736,703
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 142 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Economic development;
Footpaths;
Affordable housing; and
Environmental and sustainability initiatives.
Survey respondents were most satisfied with Council‟s general garbage collection,
libraries, recycling and sewerage management services.
Benchmarking of Council‟s Survey results against 20 other councils showed that
Kempsey Shire Council was equal or above average in the following service areas:
general garbage collection; Libraries; recycling; satisfaction with community
consultation/communication; town roads; and satisfaction with the way contact
with Council was handled.
58% of survey respondents were „satisfied‟ or „very satisfied‟ with Council
performance, 23% were neutral and 18% were „dissatisfied‟ or „very dissatisfied.
60% of survey respondents were „satisfied‟ with Council‟s current level of
communication with the community, 24% were neutral and only 15% were
„dissatisfied‟.
54% of respondents had contact with Council in the last 12 months and of these
66% were „satisfied‟ with how Council handled this contact, 13% were neutral, and
21% were dissatisfied.
Respondents identified the highest priority issues for the next 10 years in Kempsey
Shire as:
Roads and footpaths (31%)
Business and employment (14%)
Development (14%)
Services and facilities (13%)
Health (11%)
Youth issues (11%)
The item respondents valued most about living in Kempsey Shire were:
Lifestyle (72%); and
The Natural Environment (55%).
8.9 INCREASING ENERGY PRICES
Energy prices have been rising steadily over the past five to six years and feedback
from energy providers is that prices are set to increase further in the coming years.
Increases in energy prices place extra pressures on Council‟s limited operating budget.
RESPONSE
What are the responses and how effective are they?
8.10 ENERGY & GREENHOUSE REPORTS
The introduction of detailed energy and greenhouse data reports during the past five
reporting periods has enabled for the first time, a reasonably accurate measure of
Council‟s energy consumption and greenhouse gas generation. By quantifying current
and historic energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions Council can develop a
strategic framework to reduce future consumption and emissions.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 143 - Printed on Recycled Paper
8.11 GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION GOALS
Council has set a target for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as part of the
Cities for Climate Protection Program. At its December 2008 meeting Council agreed
to endorse the setting of medium and longer term emission reduction goals as follows:
Medium Term Goals: reduce per capita Council greenhouse gas emissions from
2005 levels by 10% by 2014.
Long Term Goals: reduce per capita Council greenhouse gas emissions from 2005
levels by 20% by 2020.
8.12 EMISSION REDUCTION ACTIVITES FROM VEHICLE FLEET
Although Council is yet to formally adopt a strategy for emission reduction in its
vehicle fleet, Council has adopted and continues to use the following weighted criteria
for the purchase decisions for light fleet vehicles; Annual Whole of Life Costs (incl FBT
& Fuel Consumption) 70%, CO2 Emissions 10%, Air Pollution Rating 10% and Safety
10%.
The introduction of this weighting criteria and the subsequent purchase of smaller,
more fuel efficient vehicles into the vehicle fleet continues to see a reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions.
8.13 WATER SAVING ACTIVITIES
During the 2007/08 year Macleay Water undertook a leak detection program. Under
this program the entire Reticulation Infrastructure network was inspected for leaks to
identify any potential water losses through the network.
8.14 TRIAL OF ALTERNATIVE COPY & PRINTING PAPER
During the early part of 2008/09 reporting period, Council trialled the use of
„Canefields‟ copy paper for use in all internal printers and copy machines. The trial
found that the performance of the paper was relatively good in small print jobs,
however it did not perform as well when using it for larger print jobs such as printing
the Council agendas, where paper jams were regularly encountered. Council will
continue to investigate options for a reliable environmentally friendly copy and printing
paper.
8.15 SUSTAINABLE CHOICE PROGRAM
„Sustainable Choice‟ is a
sustainable purchasing
program helping Local
Government meet
Ecologically Sustainable
Development (ESD) and triple bottom line objectives. It is a joint undertaking of the
Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW with the Department of
Environment and Conservation NSW (DEC), and participating councils. The program
provides support and guidance to councils on products and services that save energy
or water, contain recycled content, are non toxic, have greenhouse or biodiversity
benefits, or advance council‟s social or environmental objectives in some way.
Since joining the Program in 2007 Council achieved the following:
Conducted a review of Council‟s existing Management Policy - Purchasing of Good
and Services (M11: 17) with the inclusion of sustainable procurement principles.
Undertaken a trial run of „Canefields‟ copy paper made from sugar cane waste.
Introduction of old light bulb collection service for civic centre and depot.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 144 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Staff given option of ordering an alternative diary type, made from 100% recycled
materials and including environmental friendly living tips, in the 2008 corporate
diary order.
Conducted electricity monitoring and benchmarking the environmental footprint of
a number Council‟s larger electricity user sites, as well the vehicle fleet and waste
services section.
Ran a staff competition to develop sustainability slogan and logo to be used on all
future staff education materials.
Commenced drafting of sustainable procurement template for tenders and EOI‟s.
Sustainable purchasing will assist Council to meet its ESD obligations under the Local
Government Act 1993 and address the triple bottom line (environment, social and
economic) outcomes outlined in the Kempsey Shire ESD Strategy.
8.16 ENVIRONMENTAL LEVY WORKS PROGRAM
The Minister for Local Government has approved an extension of the Environmental
Levy for a ten year period commencing from the 2009/10 year.
Kempsey Shire Council conducted a number of significant environmental projects
during the 2010/2011 financial year. The following table provides a breakdown of
specific environmental program works undertaken in 2010/11 and related budgetary
information including the Environmental Levy.
Table 23 - Environmental Projects and Environmental Levy
Item 2010/11
Income
Levy $501,795.00
Expenditure
Revenue Expenditure
Saltwater EMP Implementation $1,947.69
Macleay River Floodplain Project $6,428.00
Gills Creek Rehabilitation Project $1,655.81
Saleyards Environmental Works $25.01
Boyters Lane Wetland Project $2,322.00
Korogora Creek EMP Implementation $17,580.14
Coastal Management Plan $15,846.37
Estuary Management Plan $30,000.00
Land Release Strategy Review $4,430.00
Koala Plan $58.13
Beachwatch $28,000.00
Stormwater Projects $6,138.81 $30,760.50
Loan Repayments $339,531.00
$453,962.96 Loan
Expenditure
Flood Mitigation $1,072.27
$1,072.27
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 145 - Printed on Recycled Paper
Total Expenditure
$455,035.23
Environmental Levy funds held for future projects $47,832.04
What does this show?
As indicated by the breakdown in expenditure in the above table, Council has
conducted a number of environmental projects through the use of funds raised through
the Environmental Levy. It should also be noted that the funds from the Environmental
Levy allocated to each project does not necessarily denote the full funds spent on that
project. In many cases funding from the Environmental Levy for certain projects
enabled Council to apply for matching grant funding to undertake certain projects. The
net result being that more environmental projects were able to be undertaken as a
result of budget funding from the Levy.
8.17 ESD – TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE REPORTING
Kempsey Shire Council has developed a Triple Bottom Line (i.e. Environmental, Social
and Economic) reporting template for all business paper reports. The aim of the
template is to ensure that social, economic and environmental considerations are duly
addressed to enable informed decision making for sustainable outcomes. Further
refinement and training of staff is required to ensure the tool is used correctly
throughout the organisation and has been listed as a high priority action in the
Kempsey Shire ESD Strategy.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
What more could be done?
8.18 FURTHER ENERGY & GREENHOUSE REPORTS & BENCHMARKING
Ongoing energy and greenhouse reports are needed to continually monitor Council‟s
energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions to identify any trends. Part of the
production of the reports, will include a benchmarking process to benchmark, or assess
selected Council premises against similar premises at similar sized Council‟s for energy
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
8.19 ENERGY AUDITS
Council should undertake further energy audits to identify operational areas where
energy consumption can be reduced.
8.20 GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PLAN
Council should commence preparations for the development of a Local Greenhouse
Action Plan designed to coordinate activities to help Council and the Community to
achieve the adopted emission reduction goals.
8.21 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
As part of a strategic overhaul of the existing street lighting asset plan, Council should
also explore a partnership with Country Energy to retrofit inefficient street lighting
bulbs to save on energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 146 - Printed on Recycled Paper
8.22 FLEET MANAGEMENT
Consideration should be given to increasing the weighting percentage of CO2 emissions
when purchasing new vehicles.
8.23 WATER SAVING ACTIVITIES
Ongoing assessment of water usage and efficiencies will be conducted on Council
premises with ongoing investigations to assess options for reducing water
consumption.
8.24 ALTERNATIVE COPY & PRINTING PAPER
Council will continue the search for a reliable, well performing ecologically friendly
paper that is ideally made from at least 80% recycled post consumer waste.
8.25 STAFF EDUCATION
Staff education and awareness of paper usage should be conducted, with the aim of
reducing overall paper usage.
8.26 SUSTAINABLE CHOICE PROGRAM
Council will continue it‟s commitment to the Sustainable Choice Program during
2011/12. A high priority action to be implemented during the 2011/12 reporting period
is to develop a means of providing sustainability related educational and promotional
material to Council staff, as well as proving professional development training on
sustainable procurement (purchasing) to key staff members.
REFERENCES & FURTHER READING
ABS (2007), Census Data 2006 – Kempsey, NSW, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2007
ABS (2001), Census Data 2000 – Kempsey, NSW, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2001
ABS (1996), Census Data 1995 – Kempsey, NSW, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996
Ashley, P. M., Graham, B. P., Tighe, M. K., and Wolfenden, B. J., (2007) Antimony and
arsenic dispersion in the Macleay River catchment, New South Wales: a study of the
environmental geochemical consequences, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences (2007)
54, (83-103).
Ashley, P., and Graham, B., (2001). Heavy Metal Loadings of Stream in the Macleay
River Catchment – A geochemical study of stream sediments and waters in the
Macleay River catchment, northern NSW. Report to Mid North Coast Catchment
Management Board, NSW Department of Mineral Resources and Armidale Dumaresq
Council.
Atkinson, G. (1999). Soil Landscapes of the Kempsey 1:100 000 Sheet. Department of
Land & Water Conservation. Kempsey.
CSIRO (2003) Urban and Regional Air Pollution, Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organisation, July 2003,
http://www.dar.csiro.au/information/urbanpollution.html Accessed 19/08/05
DECCW (2011) Provision of Information for State of the Environment Report 2010-
2011 Kempsey Shire Council, Department of Environment, Climate Change & Water,
September 2011.
DECCW (2011) POEO Licence List, Department of Environment, Climate Change &
Water, www.environment.nsw.gov.au, Accessed September 2011.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 147 - Printed on Recycled Paper
DEH (2004). Australian Biodiversity, Department of the Environment and Heritage,
Canberra Australia. www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/. Accessed: 29/08/05.
DEH (2005) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra Australia,
http://www.deh.gov.au/epbc/ Accessed 30/08/05
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (2009) Labour market data for
selected SLAs and LGAs in NSW, Labour Market Analysis Team, Labour Market
Strategies Group, Department of Employment & Workplace Relations, August 2009.
DLG (1999). Environmental Guidelines – State of the Environment Reporting by Local
Government. NSW Department of Local Government,
http://www.dlg.nsw.gov.au/Files/Information/soe99.pdf
DPI (Forest NSW) (2010) Register of Plantations Authorised under the NSW Plantations
and Reafforestation Act 1999, NSW Department of Primary Industries, October 2010.
DPI (Agriculture) (2010) Noxious Weed Declarations, NSW Department of Industries &
Investment, www.dpi.nsw.gov.au, Accessed August 2010.
DPI (Fisheries) (2011) Macleay Estuary Fish Catches, NSW Department of Primary
Industries, September 2011.
Energy Action (2010), Energy Audit Report prepared for Kempsey Shire Council, June
2010.
GECO Environmental (2006) Native Vegetation & Candidate Endangered Ecological
Community Mapping Report, GECO Environmental, July 2006.
GECO Environmental (2005) Macleay River Estuary Data Compilation Study, GECO
Environmental, August 2005.
GHD (2007) Report for Vegetation Mapping for Western Portion Kempsey LGA –
Background Report, GHD, August 2007.
Kempsey Shire Council (2004) State of the Environment Report 2004
(Comprehensive), Kempsey Shire Council 2004.
Kempsey Shire Council (2005) State of the Environment Report 2005
(Supplementary), Kempsey Shire Council 2005.
Kempsey Shire Council (2006) State of the Environment Report 2005-06
(Supplementary), Kempsey Shire Council 2006.
Kempsey Shire Council (2007) State of the Environment Report 2006-07
(Supplementary), Kempsey Shire Council, 2007.
Kempsey Shire Council (2008) State of the Environment Report 2007-08
(Supplementary), Kempsey Shire Council, 2008.
Kempsey Shire Council (2009) State of the Environment Report 2008-09
(Comprehensive), Kempsey Shire Council, 2009.
Kempsey Shire Council (2010) State of the Environment Report 2009-10
(Supplementary), Kempsey Shire Council, 2010.
Kempsey Shire Council (2007) Kempsey and Macleay Valley Economic Brief, Kempsey
Shire Council, July 2008.
NSW EPA (2004), River Health, Assessed by Macroinvertebrate Assemblages, New
South Wales Environmental Protection Authority, http://soedirect.nsw.gov.au Accessed
16/08/05.
NSW Government (2007) Native Vegetation Management in NSW, NSW Government,
2007, http://www.nativevegetation.nsw.gov.au/index.html. Accessed 30/10/07.
Supplementary State of Environment Report 2010/11
Kempsey Shire
- 148 - Printed on Recycled Paper
NSW NPWS (2010). Atlas of NSW Wildlife. National Parks Wildlife Services, 2010,
www.npws.nsw.gov.au Accessed 13/09/10.
Phillips, S., and Hopkins, M. (2009). Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management for
Eastern portion of Kempsey Shire LGA, Volume I – Resource Study. Biolink Ecological
Consultants, March 2009.
Phillips, S., and Hopkins, M. (2009). Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management for
Eastern portion of Kempsey Shire LGA, Vol II – The CKPoM. Biolink Ecological
Consultants, March 2009.
Telford, K., Maher, W., Krikowa, F., Foster, S., Ellwood, M.J., Ashley, P.M., Lockwood,
P.V., and Wilson, S.C. (2009) Bioaccumulation of antimony and arsenic in a highly
contaminated stream adjacent to the Hillgrove Mine, NSW, Australia, CSIRO Publishing
Environmental Chemistry, 2009, 6, 133–143.
US EPA (2004) Ozone Depletion, 2004,
http://www.epa.gov/docs/ozone/science/sc_fact.html, accessed 14/10/04.
WMA Water & South Cross University (2009) Macleay River Estuary Processes Study,
WMA Water & South Cross University (Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry), January
2009.