Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By:...

14
Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X-ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf F. Barth, Claudia Turro, Alycia M. Palmer, Erica H. Bell and Xiaokui Mo

Transcript of Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By:...

Page 1: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X-ray irradiation combined with

heavy element radiosensitization

By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf F. Barth, Claudia Turro, Alycia M. Palmer, Erica H. Bell

and Xiaokui Mo

Page 2: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Outline of presentation

Background: X-ray radiotherapy and how can we improve it?

Low energy 160 kV vs 6000 kV (6 MV) X-rays

What is radiosensitization?

enhancing X-ray dose with heavy elements to kill malignant cells

Monte Carlo simulations on radiosensitization using heavy elements (high atomic number Z or HZ – review from earlier presentation).

Experiments: promising in vitro results

In vivo experiments in progress

Page 3: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Current Radiotherapy

6 MV clinical linac (Varian Clinac)

unfiltered spectrum: ~0-6000 keV (6 MeV)

• X-rays can not differentiate between tumor tissues and healthy tissues with or with out radiosensitization

• Reason for use: penetration

Page 4: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

What if there was a way to increase the damage to tumor tissues that more than

makes up for the lack of penetration?

There is! With heavy element radiosensitization!

Page 5: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Dose Enhancement Factors

Geant4 results using 7ug/ml Pt for increase in dose deposition as a function of X-ray energy

160 kV

6 MV

Page 6: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

In vitro experiments

F98 rat glioma cells:

Radiosensitized with relatively non-toxic HZ radiosensitizer or carboplatin

Irradiated with either 6 MV or 160 kV X-rays to test changes in surviving fraction (SF)

Page 7: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

In vitro analysis Methods and materials

Clonogenic assay with Pt-sensitized F98 cells after broadband X-ray irradiation (160 kV Vs 6 MV, 7 Gy)

1.

2.

Radiosensitizers:

Pyridine Terpyridine Pt(II) complex (typ-Pt)

- low in vitro toxicity

- allows decoupling of chemotoxicity and radiotoxicity

- unexpectedly cytotoxic in vivo

Carboplatin

- common cancer therapeutic – well known cytotoxic range

- going to be used in in vivo study

Page 8: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Decrease in malignant cell survival after irradiation

varying amounts of radiosensitizer

no x-ray

6 MV

160 kV

no x-ray

6 MV

160 kV

Page 9: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Increase cell killing: Low Energy VS High Energy

160 kV

6 MV

radiation dose

Page 10: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Decrease in malignant cell survival after irradiationvarying radiation dose (with carboplatin)

No sig. difference

Page 11: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

In vivo experiments

Non – therapeutic dose of carboplatin

103 F98 glioma cells

160 kV10 Gy

6 MV10 Gy

So, what will this experiment show?

Page 12: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

In vivo experiments

Stay tuned for the sequel

Page 13: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Conclusion

In vitro experiments showed greater cell death with low energy X-rays

Radiosensitized rats treated with low energy X- rays SHOULD live longer

Page 14: Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Thanks for listening!