Superior Court 1915 MDA 2015 Petition for Allowance to Pa Supreme Court of June 6, 2016

8/15/2019 Superior Court 1915 MDA 2015 Petition for Allowance to Pa Supreme Court of June 6, 2016

1/365

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.commailto:[email protected]

Stanley J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group

1!0 "remont Street#ancaster$ %A 1&'0(

_________________________________________________________________________

PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

*n +e: STANLEY J. CATERBONEand ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,

PETITIONERS

Case No. 191 MDA !"1#ower Court Case ,o. CP-36-MD-0001108-2015Appeal -rom te /rder ntered September $ 01! in teCourt o- Common %leas o- #ancaster County$ Criminal 2iv.

#.

Lan$as%e& C'%( Po)'$e, e%.e)., DE*ENDANTS +191 MDA !"1

PETITION *OR ALLO-ANCE O* APPEAL

A,2 ,/3$ on tis 't day o- June$ 01' *$ S4A,#5 J. CA4+6/, and A27A,C2 M2*A

G+/8%$ Appellants$ appearing pro se$ do ereby -ile a %4*4*/, "/+ A##/3A,C /" A%%A# to te

%,,S5#7A,*A S8%+M C/8+4 according to %ennsylvania Code +ule 111 regarding Appeals by

Allowance. 4e certi-ied word count in tis petition is under ($000 words. 4e attaced 9*6*4 is -or

tis courts consideration under it;s discretion to allow or not allow it.

2ate: June '$ 01' )))))))))))

S%an J. Ca%e&one, P&o Se L'%'/an%ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

*&eedo0 *&o0 Co#e&% a&ass0en% 2 S3e'))an$e,4

Re/'s%e&ed 'n Penns()#an'a


www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com

[email protected]&1&


2/365

TABLE O* CONTENTS

%4*4*/, "/+ A##/3A,C /" A%%A# ==================== %age (

C/%5 /" S8%+*/+ C/8+4 /+2+ /" J8#5 1&$ 00&============. %AG &

C+4*"*CA4 /" S+7*C ==============================.. %age >

9*6*4 A =======================================. %age

TABLE O* CITATIONScontained erein

Petition for Allowance Page 2 of 50 June 6, 2016


3/365

__________________________________________________________________________________________ PETITION *OR ALLO-ANCE O* APPEAL

Case No. 191 MDA !"1#ower Court Case ,o. C%


4/365

and ailments during te stay$ wit one incident wen * begged to go to te emergencyroom -or not

being able to breat.

E. Assa3)% and Ba%%e&( 'n &o#'d'n/ an en#'&on0en% 8o& $6e0'$a)s %o e 3sed

a/a'ns% 0e, s3$6 as $6)o&o8o&0 o& so0e%6'n/ s'0')a&.

The Following Address the Federal Whistleblower and ISC Issues:

1. %etitioner was named te M/7A,4 in te #isa Micelle #ambert abeus Corpus Case o- 01E

on June !$ 01! in te 8.S. 2istrict Court -or astern %ennsylvania Case ,o. 1E& wit regards to *nternational Signal

Control$ or *SC.

&. %etitioner as been receiving Social Security 2isability 6ene-its since 00> -or symptoms

and illnesses related to 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control$ and was declared disabled in

2ecember o- 00! by te Social Security Administration. 4ere was no medical or

psyciatric evaluations per-ormed -or te application and approval process$ nor were tere

any medicalpsyciatric pro-essionals listed in any documentation.

T6e *o))o;'n/ Add&ess %6e *ede&a) -6's%)e)o;e& and ISC Iss3es

>. *SC was indicted in 11 -or illegal arms trans-ers to *raB and a H1 6illion "raud.

. %etitioner as been claiming and proving wit a preponderance o- evidence o- a vast

criminal and civil conspiracy to cover


5/365

and te "inancial 4imes o- #ondon in May$ July$ and September o- 11 was most lielyinitiated by

#ancaster ,ewspapers reporter 4omas "lannary.

1. 4omas "lannary;s mysterious deat in "ebruary o- 00E was eiter murder by poison or

was a cover story to ide te -act tat e was a C*A operative used to control te -low o-

in-ormation$ disin-ormation$ and propaganda. *t is igly subIect tat e began is career

wit #ancaster ,ewspapers in 1>& and is not a native #ancastrian.

1(. 4e *SC merger was not completed until 2ecember o- 1>&$ ( monts a-ter te "alse

Arrests o- Stan J. Caterbone.

1E. 4e o--icial meeting wit te %ennsylvania Securities Commission Agent oward isler in

September o- 1>&$ wic was solicited by Agent isler was an e--ort to illegally

interrogate Stan J. Caterbone witout a legal subpoena.

1!. *n te monts a-ter te June ($ 1>& meeting wit *SC ecutive #arry +esc Stan J.

Caterbone ad personally solicited a vast array o- local$ state$ and -ederal o--icials$

including te "6* and Congressman +obert 3aler$ %A State +epresentative Gison

Armstrong -or assistance in te retaliation and slander campaign tat was in progress.

1'. 4at tere is credible linage between te *SC Scandal$ 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control$ Stan

J. Caterbone;s -amily 7*C4*M*KA4*/,$ and #A,CAS4+ C/8,45$ %,,S5#7A,*A.

1&. 4e Koo Murder Appeal proves tat #ancaster County 2etective Micael #andis$ Judge

James Cullen$ and Judge "arina o- te #ancaster County Court o- Common %leas were all

involved in 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control be-ore 00E and be-ore Stan J. Caterbone went

public wit is 7*C4*M*KA4*/, o- 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

1>.6obby +ay *nman$ -ormer director o- te ,ational Security Agency ?,SA was on te 6oard

o- 2irectors o- *SC and was involved in 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control 4ecnologies troug

is company S.A.*.C. Corporation. 6obby +ay *nman would later be selected by "ormer

%resident 6ill Clinton -or is 2irector o- 2e-ense$ but would later remove imsel- due to

allegations and public scrutiny -or is role in te *SC scandal.

1. *n te "all o- 11 +obert Gates was nominated -or 2irector o- te Central *ntelligence

Agency ?C*A and during is televised con-irmation earings te was subIect to brutal

array o- Buestions concerning is participation in te *SC scandal. e went on to be

nominated and later would serve bot te 6us Administrations and te /bama

Administrations as Secretary o- 2e-ense until resigning in 011.

0. 4e above -inding o- -acts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and criminal

enterprise tat violates bot civil and criminal +*C/ statutes and antitrust statutes.

1. 4e above would constitute treble damages -or Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group in

8.S. 2istrict

Courts$ speci-ically in te astern 2istrict -or %ennsylvania Case ,o. 0!>$ 0'


6/365

&(01. %ersons wo may be subIect to involuntary emergency eamination and treatment?a %ersons

SubIect.


7/365

is due process rigts=N.

(E.emp-ield 4ownsip v. apcuc 1!( %a. Commonwealt. 1&('0 A. d. ''> ?1( %ro

Se 6rie- -ailed to comply wit %a. +ules o- Appellate %rocedure$ but te -ailure to comply

did not substantially impede te Courts ability to review te issues presented and tere-ore

considered te merits o- te case.

1. %a.+.A.%. 111!?a?(. 4e Buestions presented -or review is weter te %4*4*/,+ was ever

given an opportunity witout undo in-luence and malice in preparing an appeal1. %4*4*/,+

as made numerous complaint regarding computer acing$ te-t o- te -iles and evidentiary

materials o- tese cases$ undo in-luence$ public corruption and suc activities tat ave

precluded te %4*4*/,+ -rom -ul-illing te reBuirements and /+2+S o- te Courts . 4e

Courts must allow te %4*4*/,+ to appeal tis case and ave is arguments ruled upon te

merits and pleadings. %a.+.A.%. 111!?a?E %a.+.A.%. 111!?a?! 111!?c.

!. 4e case can be made tat bot o- te above Superior Court Cases were 0a)'$'o3s)( and

3&ose83))( d's0'ssed ! ;ee>s e8o&e %6e s$6ed3)ed ORAL ARGUMENTS o8 Ma( !@,

!"1 8o& 8ea& o8 e0a&&ass'n/ %6e Co3&%s and %6e J3d/es ;'%6 0ean'n/83) and

s3$$ess83) a&/30en%s. *n addition te Courts ave an agenda o- preventing my allegations

o- malicious prosecution and te victimiDation troug te use o- 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control$

lectromagnetic 3eapons$ and /rganiDed Staling. 4e sceduled /ral Arguments would ave

only provided me wit an opportunity to gain credibility witin te Courts and te %ublic( Civil +igts Acts and 1> 8.S.C.A. Acts state te -ollowing: 4e underlying purpose o- te sceme o-

protecting constitutional rigts are to permit victims o- constitutional violations to obtain redress$ to provide -or-ederal prosecution o- serious constitutional violations wen state criminal proceedings are ine--ective -or purposeo- deterring violations and to strie a balance between protection o- individual rigts -rom state in-ringement andprotection -rom state and local government -rom -ederal inter-erenceN$ 1> 8.S.C.A. OO E1$ EL 8.S.C.A. P Const.Art. $ !(L Amend. 1($ 1E$ !$ 1!$ O : E 8.S.C.A. OO 1>1$ 1>!$ 1>>$ "ed. +ules Civil %roc. +ule >$8.S.C.A. *n Ascolese v. Souteastern 4urnpie Autority$ C ! ". supp. (!1$ te case supports te notion tat /ne o- te principal purposes o- O 1>( was to give remedy to parties deprived o- Constitutional +igts$privileges$ and immunities by /--icialQs abuse o- is or er position$ tat is to provide remedy against individualo--icials wo violate Constitutional +igts$ E 8.S.C.A. O 1>(



8/365

as 7o&/an'ed s%a)>'n/ ando& e)e$%&on'$ and 0'nd 0an'3)a%'on %o&%3&e e'n/

$o00'%%ed a/a'ns% 6'0 o- te 8nited States Code$ 1> 8.S.C.O 1'1 troug 1> 8.S.C. O 1'>.



9/365

. I $'%e R3)e + and +? 8&o0 %6e 8o))o;'n/ R3)e 111@.

*&o0 R3)e 111@. S%anda&ds Go#e&n'n/ A))o;an$e o8 Aea).

?a General Rule. cept as prescribed in %a.+.A.%. 1101 ?appeals as o- rigt -rom te Commonwealt

Court$ review o- a -inal order o- te Superior Court or te Commonwealt Court is not a matter o- rigt$ but o- sound Iudicial discretion$ and an appeal will be allowed only wen tere are special and

important reasons tere-or.

?bStandards. A petition -or allowance o- appeal may be granted -or any o- te -ollowing reasons:

1.?1 te olding o- te intermediate appellate court con-licts wit anoter intermediate appellate courtopinionL

.? te olding o- te intermediate appellate court con-licts wit a olding o- te %ennsylvaniaSupreme Court or te 8nited States Supreme Court on te same legal BuestionL

(.?( te Buestion presented is one o- -irst impressionLE. te Buestion presented is one o- suc substantial public importance as to reBuire prompt and

de-initive resolution by te %ennsylvania Supreme CourtL!.te issue involves te constitutionality o- a statute o- te CommonwealtL

. %6e 'n%e&0ed'a%e ae))a%e $o3&% 6as so 8a& dea&%ed 8&o0 a$$e%ed F3d'$'a) &a$%'$es o&so a3sed '%s d's$&e%'on as %o $a)) 8o& %6e ee&$'se o8 %6e Penns()#an'a S3&e0e Co3&%Hss3e'so&( a3%6o&'%( o&?. %6e 'n%e&0ed'a%e ae))a%e $o3&% 6as e&&oneo3s)( en%e&ed an o&de& 3as6'n/ o& d's0'ss'n/an aea).

/--icial ,ote4e petition -or allowance o- appeal is synonymous wit a petition -or allocatur.

%a.+.A.%. 111E?b?& supersedes te practice described in Vaccone v. Syken$ !>& %a. (>0$ (>E n.$

> A.d 110($ 110' n. ?00'

4e %4*4*/,+ is reBuesting tat te Supreme Court provide relie- by remanding tis case

bac to te 4rial Court wit protection o- te %4*4*/,+QS rigt to due process and access to te

courts$ wit an /+2+ providing tat te original complaint be reinstated and te allegations beproperly adIudicated wit all matters litigated.

+espect-ully submitted$

2ate: June '$ 01'

)))))))))))S%an J. Ca%e&one, P&o Se L'%'/an%ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

*&eedo0 *&o0 Co#e&% a&ass0en% 2 S3e'))an$e,

4



[email protected]

&1&


10/365

CERTI*ICATE O* SERVICE

* ereby certi-y tat a true and correct copy o- te -oregoing %4*4*/, "/+ A##/3A,C /"

A%%A# as been served tis 't day o- June 01'$ by and delivery or electronic communications:

Mr. Craig Stedman

#ancaster County 2istrict Attorney#ancaster County Courtouse

!0 ,ort 2ue Street#ancaster$ %A 1&'0

%resident Judge +einaer

#ancaster County Courtouse

!0 ,ort 2ue Street#ancaster$ %A 1&'0

2ate: June '$ 01'

S )))))))))))





[email protected]

&1&


11/365

J-A14034-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCEDMEDIA GROUP,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OFPENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

LANCASTER CITY POLICE,

Appellee No. 1915 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Order Entered September 29, 2015

in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County

Criminal Division at No.: CP-36-MD-0001108-2015

BEFORE: BOWES, J., OTT, J., and PLATT, J.*

MEMORANDUM BY PLATT, J.: FILED MAY 11, 2016

Appellant, Stanley J. Caterbone, appeals pro se from the September

29, 2015, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County

upholding the District Attorney’s disapproval of his private criminal

complaint. The Commonwealth has filed a motion to quash. For the reasons

set forth herein, we grant the Commonwealth’s motion and quash the

appeal.

Although the facts of this case are not readily apparent, it is evident

from the record that Appellant filed a Private Criminal Complaint directly

with the District Attorney against the Chief of the Lancaster City Police

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.



12/365

J-A14034-16

- 2 -

Department, the Department, a Detective and four police officers, two

named and two listed as John Doe 1 and John Doe 2. (See Private Criminal

Complaint, 7/27/15, at 1).

Appellant’s brief substantially fails to comply with our rules of

appellate procedure. It is thirteen pages long and consists of a cover page,

an instruction Order from the Superior Court, eleven pages that consist of a

half-page “CONCISE STATEMENT OF MATTERS COMPLAINED,” and a nine

and a half-page section entitled, “BRIEF,” which appears to be an

unsuccessful attempt at an argument section. (Appellant’s Brief, at 3; see

id. at 1-13). He also attaches two orders from the common pleas court,

both with a Superior Court Docket No. 1108 MD 2015; the letter from the

District Attorney’s Office dated August 31, 2015, indicating disapproval of

the private complaint; and finally, the two pages of the complaint itself.

(See id. at attachments).

The complaint states that the acts committed by the accused were:

“Working Theory confirmed by Experts Cheryl Welsh and Derrick Robinson,

both Targeted individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control ‘It is known in the

community by a [sic] some [sic] that ‘they’ will Target and [sic] individual

(Stan J. Caterbone) and Target others in the COMMUNITY (Lancaster) to

HARASS, STALK, Etc.,) in order to drive the ORIGINAL Target to Suicide.”

(Private Criminal Complaint, 7/27/15, at 2). The complaint then goes on to

state that the acts committed violated “Sec. 2901 of Title 18 and Section



13/365

J-A14034-16

- 3 -

3503 of Title 18.” (See id.). Section 2901 involves the crime of kidnapping,

and Section 3503 prohibits criminal trespass. See 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 2901,

3503.

On August 31, 2015, the District Attorney’s Office of Lancaster County

denied Appellant’s criminal complaint. Appellant appealed to the trial court,

which affirmed the denial on September 29, 2015. Appellant timely

appealed.1

On February 22, 2016, the Appellee, the District Attorney of Lancaster

County, filed a motion to quash this appeal. On March 11, 2016, Appellant

filed an answer. Action on the motion was deferred to the merits panel by

April 1, 2016 per curiam order. The motion to quash was premised on

Appellant’s failure to follow the dictates of Pa.R.A.P. 2111. (See Motion to

Quash, 2/22/16, at 1-2). The answer, while sixty-five pages long, did not

address any of the allegations of the motion. (See Answer to Motion to

Quash, 3/11/16, at 1-65).

As this Court has reiterated on numerous occasions:

While [we are] willing to liberally construe materials filed by a pro se litigant, we note that appellant is not entitled to anyparticular advantage because [he] lacks legal training. As our

[S]upreme [C]ourt has explained, any layperson choosing to

represent [himself] in a legal proceeding must, to some ____________________________________________

1 On November 25, 2015, Appellant filed a Rule 1925(b) statement of errorscomplained of on appeal pursuant to the court’s order. See Pa.R.A.P.1925(b). The court filed an opinion on December 9, 2015. See Pa.R.A.P.

1925(a).



14/365

J-A14034-16

- 4 -

reasonable extent, assume the risk that [his] lack of expertise

and legal training will prove [his] undoing.

O’Neill v. Checker Motors Corp., 567 A.2d 680, 682 (Pa. Super. 1989)

(citations and quotation marks omitted); accord Branch Banking & Trust

v. Gesiorski , 904 A.2d 939, 942 (Pa. Super. 2006); Smathers v.

Smathers, 670 A.2d 1159, 1160 (Pa. Super. 1996). Indeed, “ pro se status

does not entitle a party to any particular advantage because of his or her

lack of legal training.” First Union Mortgage Corp. v. Frempong, 744

A.2d 327, 333 (Pa. Super. 1999).

The Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure provide, in relevant

part:

Briefs and reproduced records shall conform in all material

respects with the requirements of these rules as nearly as thecircumstances of the particular case will admit, otherwise they

may be suppressed, and, if the defects are in the brief orreproduced record of the appellant and are substantial, the

appeal or other matter may be quashed or dismissed.

Pa.R.A.P. 2101.

Because of the substantial defects in Appellant’s brief in a companion

case listed before this same panel, we were unable to conduct a meaningful

review of the appeal’s merits. (See Caterbone v. Residents of the

County of Lancaster Pennsylvania, No. 1561 MDA 2015, J-A14016-16

(Pa. Super. May 10, 2016)). Likewise, we are unable to do so in this case.

Appellant’s brief does not contain a statement of jurisdiction, a

statement of the order in question, a statement of the scope and standard of

review, a statement of the questions involved, or a conclusion “stating the



15/365

J-A14034-16

- 5 -

precise relief sought.” Pa.R.A.P. 2111(a). Indeed, upon our review of

Appellant’s brief, we are unable to discern why he believes the trial court’s

denial of his petition was incorrect, or the nature of his underlying claims.

The brief contains a long quotation from the Mental Health Procedures Act,

a purported involuntary commitment petition under Section 302 of that Act,

see 50 P.S. § 7302, the Act of July 9, 1976, No. 143, § 302, as amended, a

letter to the editor written by Appellant, and a copy of a complaint he filed in

federal court. (See Appellant’s Brief, at 4-13). It does not contain any

argument. (See id.). “When issues are not properly raised and developed

in briefs, when the briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for

review[,] a Court will not consider the merits thereof.” Commonwealth v.

Maris, 629 A.2d 1014, 1017 (Pa. Super. 1993) (citation omitted).

Therefore, we grant Appellee’s motion to quash this appeal.

Moreover, if we were to consider the validity of the trial court’s ruling,

we would find Appellant is entitled to no relief.

When this Court reviews a Common Pleas Court’s decision

concerning private criminal complaints, our review is congruentwith the standard that was to be applied by the Common PleasCourt. Thus, where a D.A. denied a complaint on purely legalgrounds and where the Common Pleas Court was therefore to

undertake de novo review, we review the Common Pleas Court’s

decision for an error of law, thereby applying a de novo standardand a plenary scope of review. However, where the D.A. deniedthe complaint on a policy basis or a hybrid of legal and policy

bases, and where the Common Pleas Court was therefore toapply an abuse of discretion standard, we similarly review the

court’s decision for an abuse of discretion. An abuse ofdiscretion is not a mere error in judgment. It is a decision based

on bias, partiality, prejudice, ill will, manifest unreasonableness,



16/365

J-A14034-16

- 6 -

or misapplication of law.

Commonwealth ex rel. Guarrasi v. Carroll , 979 A.2d 383, 385–86 (Pa.

Super. 2009) (citations omitted).

An examination of the private criminal complaint in this case reveals it

fails to contain a “summary of the facts sufficient to advise the defendant of

the nature of the offense charged,” as required by the Pennsylvania Rules of

Criminal Procedure. Pa.R.Crim.P. 504(6)(a). Rather, it merely attaches a

series of unexplained documents and photographs similar to those attached

to Appellant’s brief herein. (See Private Criminal Complaint, 7/25/15, at

Attachments; Appellant’s Brief, at 2-13). As noted by the trial court in its

December 9, 2015 opinion, Appellant’ s petition for review of the denial of

the private complaint “was too convoluted to discern any potential grounds

for approv[al],” and the 200-plus page petition contains many inconceivable

allegations and exhibits, such as involvement of the Lancaster County bench

in “U.S. sponsored mind control,” and government invasion of his “thoughts

via remote sensing technologies and introducing poisonous gas into his

home.” (Trial Court Opinion, 12/09/15, at unnumbered pages 2-3).

We agree with the trial court that the petition presented no cognizable

grounds for the filing of a criminal complaint.

Therefore, under either standard of Carroll , it is obvious that the trial

court ruling would have been affirmed. See Carroll , supra at 385-86.



17/365

J-A14034-16

- 7 -

Commonwealth’s motion granted. Appeal quashed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.Prothonotary

Date: 5/11/2016



18/365

S%an J. Ca%e&oneADVANCED MEDIA GROUP*&eedo0 *&o0

Co#e&% a&ass0en% 2 S3e'))an$e,4


1!" *&e0on% S%&ee%Lan$as%e&, PA 1?":

;;;.a0//)oa)en%e%a'n0en%/&o3.$o0s%an$a%e&oneK/0a').$o0

_________________________________________________________________________

PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))


PETITIONERS

Case No. 191 MDA !"1#ower Court Case ,o. CP-36-MD-0001108-2015

Appeal -rom te /rder ntered September $ 01! in teCourt o- Common %leas o- #ancaster County$ Criminal 2iv.

#.

Lan$as%e& C'%( Po)'$e, e%.e)., DE*ENDANTS +191 MDA !"1

APPLICATION *OR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN *ORMA PAUPERIS

*$ Stanley J. Caterbone$ due to my -inancial condition$ am unable to pay te costs o-tis action$ were-ore$ * reBuest * be permitted to -ile *n "orma %auperis.

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))Signature

June '$ 01'2ate

ORDER

A,2 ,/3$ tis )))))))) day o- ))))))))))))))))))) 0))))))$ upon presentation andconsideration o- te attaced in-ormation regarding te reBuest o- ))))))))))))))))))))

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) to -ile *n "orma %auperis$ said reBuest is ereby

))))))))))))))) G+A,42

))))))))))))))) 2,*2$ te Cler o- te Court is directed to strie te appeal i- te costsare not paid witin 0 days.

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))Judge


http://www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com/mailto:[email protected]://www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com/mailto:[email protected]


19/365


PETITIONERSCase No. 11 MDA !"1#ower Court Case ,o. 1! -or tesymptoms and illnesses o- 8.S. Sponsored Mind Control o- wic * ave over 10 pages o- copied

autentic images o- te application process bewtween mysel- and te SSA to prove tat te mental

de-ect is not -rom any nown or associated mental de-ect. Copies can be provided upon reBuestR



20/365

*- you are presently unemployed$ state date o- last employment

?d /ter income witin te past twelve monts:

6usiness or %ro-ession ))))))))))))),one)))))))))))))))))))))))))

/ter sel-


21/365

?- %roperty owned:

Cas )))))))))))))))) H>0.00)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Cecing account ))))))))))))),one))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Savings account ))))))))))))),one)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Certi-icates o- deposit ))))))))))))),one)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

+eal estate ?including ome ))))))))))))),one))))))))))))))))))))))))

Mo%o& #e6'$)e= Ma>e Yea& ______!""? onda CRV _________

Cos% A0o3n% O;ed ________11,"""."" None___ ___________________

S%o$>s, onds NonMa&>e%a)e_99,"""_S6a&es_Ad#an$ed Med'a G&o3___

O%6e& ____:","""_e)d_In_$6e$>'n/ a$$o3n%s______

____D's3&se0en%_*&o0_*o&e$)os3&e_See_S3e&'o&_Co3&%_1@:_MDA_!""

____and 8&o0 %6e !""9 d's3&s0en% o8 1 (ea& &e%&oa$%'#e SSA Bene8'%s o8!1,@.""

? S6a&e *3)%on *'nan$'a) Co&o&a%'on 1!.?

?g 2ebts and obligations:

Mortgage )))))))))))))))),one))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

+ent ))))))))))))))))),one)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

/ter )))))))))))))))See 0!


22/365

E. * understand tat * ave a continuing obligation to in-orm te court o- improvement in my -inancial

circumstances$ wic would permit me to pay te costs incurred erein.

!. * veri-y tat te statements made in tis a--idavit are true and correct. * understand tat

-alse statements erein are being made subIect to te penalties o- 1> %a.C.S. HE0E$ relating tounsworn -alsi-ication to autorities.

+espect-ully submitted$

2ate: June '$ 01' )))))))))))




1!0 "remont Street

#ancaster$ %A 1&'0(www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com

[email protected]

&1&


23/365

Pe%'%'on o8 P&'#a%e C&'0'na) Co0)a'n% #. Lan$as%e& C'%( Po)'$e 8o& :"! o8 J3)(9, !"1 8')ed Se%e0e& !:, !"1 8o& Pe%'%'on 8o& A))o;an$e



24/365

!

"#$ %& ! '( # # )#* " #+ ! '(,,# -##),,# #.

- %! / & 0123 % (/ &/!

' 4% !% !!5/ ! & 6 27 89 0:12

"##+ ; / 89


25/365

!

%& ! '( ! '(

$ $ $ .+ , $ # .

% '! % 5 & % 4 & %/! !!5/ %& 5 )% /! && & % & %

((4% !!5/ 565! :=02><! 2F>1<!G(!(444(66(65'(

2 of 9 Thursday, September 24, 2015Petition for Allowance Page 25 of 50 June 6, 2016


26/365

2

% '' '/5 & !6 '' & ' ( ('! ! ! &%

( 2D @2:7:A -% %/!

!! % /!'' & ' ( (' 4% /! (! & ' %!

5 4 /!5 % /( ! 6!! 5! & /! ((4%

%/D17 5' 002 3:> 0/ 70F @2::2A ! # -/ F D % !' /& ?//

' /! '!5 !! &( % /& // % /! 5! &

?5 '4! &/ % /! #/ % '4 '' /!''

' ( ('! 6/ 5/ ( 2>1 @2:F3A %

H5(! & % !!5 & '!! '5!5 ( (' '//



27/365

( 2


28/365

( & 6 %

**#701 #"! #11).5 " $.4:!"% #" )":.4"/)"1 (4. 63)/6#0* 14 ;) 7*)!

#%#"*1 /) *763 #* 6304.4(4./ 4. *4/)13"% */0#.

2 4! (/ % )* % ! )% ( $5! '5! ! & 012D

5 03 0123 % . ! 5 & ! ! ! 2D=1033:

0 %! &( / && (6 ('! & ('5 %6

%!!( %! '! / '' % ! %

! 5 ! K! && % ! +K! && /

% ,# $!56 ' 5 : 0123

=D>31 13=0077A / ! @17=2


29/365

/ ! 4!''! ' %(! ,

20%(! ,K! (!5! /% ,5 & 011D 4! % (5/ '!

4! ! %/ % & % % 4! # ' 5!/ % &4 &

&( /!&( / ''6/ # ! %6% !5B % % 6 %!

4% ! 4!''! 2:7F / ! !

2


30/365

@A !! 5B == -% '! ! ! ( / / &

((/ ( % ( (/ !5B 5 (6

?( / ( '! ! ! ( /!/ 4% ! !5

& ( !! %! ' ?! !&= B5/6( / /!

% /5 & %! &&! / ! ! & %! 4 '! /! !

! !!/ % % '!! / '! /6 & %( %!

%(!&

0 // ((/ 6 / %! & /( % !/ & / /

/!' ((5 4% % &/K! / %( /4 / // 4 %

&/K! & %! 6 / 6%!

0F // ! ( / !(! % % !!5 4! & %

K! % ! )% ( !

07 // %4 5 %! 4/4 &/! / %! I!! !J & %

6C/ 6 6 % / ' %! 6 (/ ! )* %

5! % ! )% ( !

0:&/K! // 6 / !! % K! / /4 '%! !!5

% / 66 & "##+ (6 &( %! /

!/


31/365

DDA % 5// %

&46 I % ' & 5&!! !5 /&/ 6 /'/ &

%! /5 '!! 6%!PJ

:=02>1<!G(!(444(66(65'(



32/365

#,# , *#

! 5 ! 31 % 5

! 2F>10

4! ?5/ / & '( 0123

'( 0>:=02><! 2F>1<!G(!(444(66(65'(



33/365

1 of 114Petition for Allowance Page 33 of 50


34/365



35/365



36/365



37/365



38/365



39/365



40/365



41/365



42/365



43/365



44/365



45/365



46/365



47/365



48/365



49/365



50/365

9*6*44e attaced 9*6*4 is -or tis courts consideration under it;s discretion to allow or not allow it.



51/365

Stan J. CaterboneADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Srve!""an#e$%

Re!stered !n Penns'"van!a()*+ Fremont Street

,an#aster$ PA (-+/

000.am"oba"enteta!nmentro1.#omstan#aterbone2ma!".#om

33333333333333333333333333333333333333

E4C,USIVE 5rans#r!1ts o6 78!st"eb"o0er 5est!mon!es as5areted Ind!v!da"s o6 U.S. S1onsored M!nd Contro" and

Re"ated Hear!ns and ,e#tres

Pb"!s8ed b' Advan#ed Med!a Gro1 Jne )$ )+(9 33333333333333333333333333333333333333

Jne *$ )+(

5A:,E OF CON5EN5S

1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual2. Transcript of the Richmond Cit Council !ublic "earing of #a 1$% 2&1' !assing

a Cit Resolution '(2 to Ban Spaced(Based )eapons in Support of the #anTargeted Individuals Suffering Smptoms of the Cit.3. *aren Ste+art% ,S- )histleblo+er and Targeted Individual. There is no doubt that ,S- is no+ run b scophants and sociopaths'. /0CSI3/4 5ormer ,S- /mploee Speaks 6ut on its Corruption 7 *aren

Ste+art8. The Intervie+9. ,S- )histleblo+er Comes 6ut of the Shado+s Into the ight b *aren Ste+art:. The Intervie+$. Julianne #c*inne% S -rm Intelligence 6fficer% )histleblo+er% and Targeted

Individual

1&. Transcript 6f ;reg Sr. ,ick Begich% -uthor and /?pert Researcher of .S. Sponsored #ind

Control12. 6ctober 1% 2&1' ,ick Begich ecture at the Covert "arassment Conference

in Berlin% ;erman

Mind Control Transcripts Page 1 of 173 Sunday, June 5, 2016Mind Control Transcripts Page 1 of 183 Sunday, June 5, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 60 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 183

Mind Control Transcripts Page 1 of 189 Sunday, June 5, 2016Mind Control Transcript Page 1 of 191 Sunday, June 5, 2016Mind Control Transcripts Page 1 of 316 Monday, June 6, 2016



52/365



Re!stered !n Penns'"van!a

()*+ Fremont Street,an#aster$ PA (-+/


3333333333333333333333333333333333 E4C,USIVE 5rans#r!1ts o6 78!st"eb"o0er 5est!mon!es as5areted Ind!v!da"s o6 U.S. S1onsored M!nd Contro" and

Re"ated Hear!ns and ,e#tres9

33333333333333333333333333333333

Jne )$ )+(

:AC;GROUND

Stan J. Caterbone@s International Signal A Control or ISC )histleblo+ing "istor and #ind

Control Relationships are outlined in the follo+ing statements and declarations% +hich have alread

been proven and verified and have never been specificall contested in an court of la+4

Stan J. Caterbone +as a 5ederal )histleblo+er in 1$:9 regarding ISC

The 2$ 5alse -rrests and !rosecutorial #isconduct that Stan J. Caterbone +as subect to in 1$:9

through 2&1' +as an effort to cover(up the allegations made b Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring and

Summer of 1$:9 after the #eeting of June 2% 1$:9 +ith ISC and nited Chem Con /?ecutive arr

Resch.

The ISC 5raud and Sales of -rms to IraD Stor b the -BC ,e+s ,ightline +ith Ted *oppel and the

5inancial Times of ondon in #a% Jul% and September of 1$$1 +as most likel initiated or +as

corroborated b ancaster ,e+spapers reporter Thomas 5lannar.

Thomas 5lannar@s msterious death in 5ebruar of 2&& +as either murder or +as a cover stor to

hide the fact that he +as a CI- operative used to control the flo+ of information% disinformation% and

propaganda. It is highl subect that he began his career +ith ancaster ,e+spapers in 1$:9 and is not

a native ancastrian.

The ISC merger +as not completed until >ecember of 1$:9% months after the 5alse -rrests of Stan

J. Caterbone.






53/365

The official meeting +ith the !ennslvania Securities Commission -gent "o+ard /isler in September of

1$:9% +hich +as solicited b -gent /isler +as an effort to illegall interrogate Stan J. Caterbone +ithout

a legal subpoena.

In the months after the June 2% 1$:9 meeting +ith ISC /?ecutive arr Resch Stan J. Caterbone had

personall solicited a vast arra of local% state% and federal officials% including the 5BI and Congressman

Robert )alker% !- State Representative ;ibson -rmstrong for assistance in the retaliation and slander

campaign that +as in progress. There is credible linkage bet+een the ISC Scandal% .S. Sponsored

#ind Control% Stan J. Caterbone@s famil 3ICTI#IE-TI6, of the same% and the participation of

-,C-ST/R C6,TF% !/,,SF3-,I-.

The Eook #urder -ppeal proves that ancaster Count >etective #ichael andis% Judge James Cullen%

and Judge 5arina of the ancaster Count Court of Common !leas +ere all involved in .S. Sponsored

#ind Control before 2&& and before Stan J. Caterbone +ent public +ith his 3ICTI#IE-TI6, of .S.

Sponsored #ind Control.

Bobb Ra Inman% former director of the ,ational Securit -genc G,S-H +as on the Board of

>irectors of ISC and +as involved in .S. Sponsored #ind Control Technologies through his compan

S.-.I.C. Corporation. Bobb Ra Inman +ould later be selected b 5ormer !resident Bill Clinton for his

>irector of >efense% but +ould later remove himself due to allegations and public scrutin for his role in

the ISC scandal.

In the 5all of 1$$1 Robert ;ates +as nominated for >irector of the Central Intelligence -genc GCI-H

and during his televised confirmation hearings the +as subect to brutal arra of Duestions concerning

his participation in the ISC scandal. "e +ent on to be nominated and later +ould serve both the Bush

-dministrations and the 6bama -dministrations as Secretar of >efense until resigning in 2&11.

There have been at least documented attempts on the life of Stan J. Caterbone 1$:9% 1$$1% and

2&&% all attempts at vehicular homicide. Thomas !. Caterbone@s passing in 1$$8 +as the result of a

+rongful death claim b 5ulton Bank. Samuel -. Caterbone +as most likel an *TR- murder tactic in

Santa Barbara% California on >ecember 2'% 1$:. Samuel !. Caterbone +as most likel the result of an

#*TR- murder tactic on Jul 2&%2&&1 in ,e+ Fork cit.

The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspirac and criminal enterprise that

violates both civil and criminal RIC6 statutes and antitrust statutes.

The above +ould constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and -dvanced #edia ;roup in .S.

>istrict Courts% specificall in the /astern >istrict for !ennslvania Case ,o. &'(22::% &8(8'&% 1(

&2''$% and other related cases and Case ,o. &:(19 in the ancaster Count Court of Common

!leas.





54/365




()*+ Fremont Stree,an#aster$ PA (-+/

000.am"oba"enteta!nmentro1.#om

stan#aterbone2ma!".#om

Richmond City Council

May 19, 2015R!#8mond C!t' Con#!" Pb"!# Hear!n o6 Ma' (


55/365

RICHMOND CI5> COUNCI, :ANS SPACED?:ASED 7EAPONSCOUNCI, MEE5ING HE,D MA> (


56/365

all of our residents in the cit.

Ma'or@ >o +e have Duestions from council members 6ka% 3ice #aor.

V Ma'or@ Just real Duickl. Fou mentioned that this +as passed b Congress. Can ou tell me +hen that

happened because I=m tring to look it up no+ and I thought that +as ust introduced in 2&&1 and neve

+asK

:e#="es@ -ctuall% #s -nderson can probabl ans+er that Duestion. )hen +as it passed at the federa

level% #s -nderson

Anderson@ $L1&L2&&2. Space !reservation -ct% former Congressman >ennis Cosenich had introduced

this bill.

V!#e Ma'or@ But +as thatK

Ma'or@ )e=re sort of getting out of our process here. I think that G+ord unclearH do ou have other

Duestions

V!#e Ma'or@ )ell% I=m looking at the sheet that ou=re looking at. It looks like that=s +hen the Burkle

Cit Council passed a resolution% not +hen Congress passed the la+. I=m looking on line at the "ouse

+ebsite. -nd I kno+ that there=s% I understand that there=s been multiple versions of this so I don=t kno+ i

it=s been passed or not. But from +hat it looks like here% it doesn=t look like that version +as passed b

Congress% so I don=t kno+ if it +as. But I understand the Burkle Cit Council passed it on $L1& of 2&&2.

Ma'or@ 6ther Duestions from the council

Ma'or@ So I had a couple of Duestions. I=m looking at the resolution and it talks about the Space

!reservation -ct. Can ou tell me +hat act that +as There=s never been a Space !reservation -ct passed

right:e#="es@ It +asn=t passed. It +as brought for+ard b the Representative% the Congressman at the time

Because there +ere some% ou kno+ ho+ it goes in )ashington% there=s ust a lot of po+er pla. So it

never gotKbut it did get passed in 2&&2 in Burkle. So +e=re making ours similar to the one that +as

passed in Burkle.

Ma'or@ )ell it doesn=t sa anthing about Burkle here. -ll it sas is the Space !reservation -ct. -re ou

talking about the resolution Burkle passed or are ou talking about one of the t+o resolutions that

Representative Cosenich introduced in 2&&1 and 2&&2

:e#="es@ )ell because that one didn=t pass +e=re ust making reference that it +as brought for+ard b

>ennis Cosenich% and of course politics being the +a the are% it did not pass. So this is% I=m making

reference to and using the Burkle model as an e?ample of ours.

Ma'or@ )hich one of the Cosenich resolutions did the Burkle model refer to

Anderson@ "R818. "ouse Resolution 818.

Ma'or@ I didn=t hear ou% +hat

Anderson@ "ouse Resolution 818.

Ma'or@ 81'.





57/365

Anderson@ 818. 1. 8.

Ma'or@ The research I did on this% that resolution +as substantiall different than "R2$99.

Anderson@ Fes sir.

Ma'or@ -nd significantl it omitted an references to chem trails% particle beams% electromagnetic

radiation% plasmas% e?tremel lo+ freDuenc or ultra(high freDuenc energ radiation and mind contro

technolog. So% the Duestion I have is% it seemed to me% it +as our intent to include all these in it% right

So if ou go +ith "R818 and +e approve this% it +ill not include an of these things I named. )as thaour intent

:e#="es@ That +as not m intent. # intent% and +orking +ith staff% of course% it helped put this together

because +e kno+ that +e get help +ith our staff. The intention +as to include all of the things that people

are feeling% eah% that people are feeling the pressures of and feeling the attacks of% and so I think thatKI

don=t kno+ ho+ much of this issue that Burkle had in theirs. But I think that to include these% and this is

the resolution saing +e support this treat% this act. Then I=d like to have it in there. Because again% to

me it=s important that +e defend% that +e support and that +e protect our residents. -nd so if these are

the things that residents are saing the=re feeling% then it should be in there.

Ma'or@ )ell% all Burkle did% and I=m looking at the Burkle resolution% and it ust sas% MIt is the +ill of

the council and the cit of Burkle that the S Senate and "ouse of Representatives enact% and the S

!resident sign and enforce the Space !reservation -ct.N But I=m confused because there +ere actuall t+o

Space !reservation -cts introduced and I think if +e=re going to do this right% +e need to define +hich one

+e=re going to support. Because the=re different.

:e#="es@ Fou=re absolutel right. -nd I +ant the best one to move for+ard as +ell% and I=m sure that the

residents +ant the best one and so.

Ma'or@ )hich one is the best one

Anderson@ "R2$99.

Ma'or@ So that +ould be "R2$99.

Anderson@ Fes.

:e#="es@ )hich is the one that includes K

Anderson@ /verthing.

Ma'or@ 6k% so% +ith that in mind% I don=t have an more council people... oh I do too. Council #emberK

eah% I=ve got a bunch Council #ember #artine< and Council #ember #caughlin.

Mart!ne@ Fes% I +anted to change the language to sa that +e endorse the intent of the act since the

act is not actuall in place.Ma'or@ The intent of +hich act

Mart!ne@ The intent of the second act.

Ma'or@ The second one is "R818.

:e#="es@ -re ou talking about "R2$99 +hich includes all that% right )hich includes the chem trails. Is

that right

#aor4 That=s m understanding of it.

:e#="es@ Is that right% Council #ember #artine


58/365

Mart!ne@ Is that the revision Right.

Ma'or@ Council #ember #caughlin.

M#,a8"!n@ -ctuall I did some research on this too. -pparentl Representative Cosenich didn=t read

full the first resolution that +as brought for+ard in his name. "e brought it for+ard based on some

recommendations. -nd +hen he realiefense Initiative% +hich +as later dubbed Star )ars% ou kno+% that=s

+here this all came from. Basicall% it +as to put +eapons technolog into space as a global shield% as a

supposed defense against China and the Soviet nion. It +as later seen as infeasible. -nd man others.

man people sa+ this asK the idea to put +eapons in spaceK+as insane. -nd I happen to think it +as a

craefense. ater in 2&&2% +hich

is currentl no+ the #issile >efense -genc. But also% along the +a% in 2&&2 >ennis Cosenich introduced

this bill% and it=s the second one that he full introduced% 818% +hich basicall called for a ban on spaced(

based +eapons. -nd then it +as% I think it +as ust introduced% a co(sponsor +as Representative Barbara

ee% and at a certain point% this Space !reservation -ct that +as ust introduced +as brought to the ,

and the Space !reservation Treat +as linked +ith it. -nd actuall the , had previousl addressedKset

upKestablished% I guess the basis for this treat b saing the +anted a permanent ban on spaced(based

+eapons that passed in the nited ,ations that passed 1'8 to &. Then Burkle supported the 2&&2 the

Space !reservation -ct and I believe also% the Space !reservation Treat.

So that=s +hat Council #ember Beckles is referring to in terms of the resolution that she=s brough

for+ard. I don=t kno+ ho+ anone can not support not having +eapons in space +hen it has beensupported b the , and also been supported% clearl stated b man e?perts that it=s infeasible this

original Ronald Reagan plan to dub this Star )ars.

I think the resolution is fine as it is. It basicall sas that the residentsKthe +ell(being of our residents is

of importance to us and it also% it doesn=t state pro or con in terms of +hat individuals are saing. But it

ust refers to the fact that our residents deserve to be protected. -nd in general it states that spaced

based +eapons are something that the cit of Richmond does not support. GapplauseH

Ma'or@ 6ka% so +ould ou call the public speakers

Anderson@ Speakers are -m -nderson% Jesse Beltrand% >r. John "all% >r. /d+ard Spencer% Ben

Colonson% isa Becker and >errick Robinson.

:e#="es@ -m ee -nderson.

Anderson@ Fes

#aor4 Could ou come over here to the podium to speak% please

Anderson@ ;ood evening Council #embers% Council Beckles. I reall +ant to thank ou for not deviating

our plan because I +ent on our 5acebook and I sa+ +h ou came in office and ou never deviated ou

plan. Fou said that ou +anted to first put the communit first and from ou doing that% I +ant to thank





59/365

ou first. -nd secondl% as a pschologist% a child pschologist% I +ant to thank ou for putting up +ith

some of those pains I have suffered along this +a. But I am here in happiness% in a moment of greatness

I have a perfect cit. ,o+here in the nited States% no targeted individualK can get this kind of support

that I have gotten. )e ust needed ust one person% one cit. -nd because of that% ou all are our heroes%

and +e +ant to thank ou. -nd I can go on and sa muchK much.

But +e are ding +ithin because the technolog is so sophisticated. It=s hard for someone +ho has no

e?perience to fathom it. It is so sophisticated. So +hat +e are saing to ou all is please let us help ouunderstand enough% as someone outside looking in to our lives. Because +e=re in pain% +e are tortured

and +e are humiliated ever da in our lives because our lives have taken on a path. )e don=t even kno+

ho+ or +h +e have this tpe of people on this planet +ho +ould harm in this tpe of +a. -nd I ust +an

to thank ou all. -nd ou% #aor% for ou being in the citK+orking in the service. Being in the service. 5o

others to do this% I kno+ that should sadden ou. GapplauseH

Jesse :e"trand@ ;ood evening% #aor% 3ice #aor and Cit Council #embers. # name is Jesse Beltrand

I=m the president of the International Center -gainst the se of Covert Technologies. 6ur organi in pscholog% and therapist% and co(author of a book about !TS>. I mself am a retired

Sacramento Cit 5ire !aramedic and a recent graduate of "#I and do provide therap to victims.

In 2&1& I met >r. "all and +hen meeting him I discovered this phenomenon and asked% M)h isn=

anthing being done about thisN "e said it=s because of the smptomolog. If everone +ent to traditiona

medicine and complained about +hat the +ere e?periencing% the +ould be railroaded into the menta

health institutions. The fact of the matter is% this is affecting all demographics of societ4 the poor% the

rich% the elite. I see victims on a monthl basis and hear from hundreds of people ever +eek. I currentl

have over 2%&&& correspondences from victims not onl +ithin% here in the nited States% but around the

+orld.

)hat +e have discovered is that there are hot pockets +ithin the nited States +here there are victims

that are being e?posed to these tpes of technologies. -nd as our speakers continue to speak the +il

e?plain to ou ho+ that has developed. Currentl the hot spots are ,e+ Fork% 5lorida% Chicago% Te?as% and

California. nfortunatel% in California% the /ast Ba has the highest amount of victims that +e havecollected in our database% +ithin our stud +ithin our organir. John "all.

:e"trand@ >r. "all is unable to be reached so +e=re going to have >r. Spencer here.

S1en#er@ #r. #aor% Cit Council% thank ou. Thank ou for attacking this ver difficult problem. -nd





60/365

there are a lot of people around the +orld% especiall in /urope% +here I attended a counsel ust recentl%

in ,ovember% +ho thank ou. I=m a retired neurologist. I attended Stanford niversit% Fale niversit and

a residenc at the niversit of California in San 5rancisco.

I=ve studied this sort of problem for a period of time. -nd it=s been a mster to me +h medicine in

general does not approach this and stud the multitude of documents that are out there. But this is the

case. -nd I +on=t ans+er this for ou% because this is an ongoing stud% ongoing problem. This is reall

intense technolog. /ssentiall +hat might be described as //; heterodning. The entire electrical activitof the human brain can be captured in this super computer and certainl processed and then put back into

someone else. I=mKit=s science fiction. But unfortunatel% it=s not science fiction. So naturall this is

difficult. So the technolog is incredible. But basicall this is a moral problem. /thical problem. This is a

violation of the golden rule% an ethics% anthing that=s decent. -nd this is a maor thing to consider. It=s

also a violation of our constitutional rights. So that=s an important thing to keep in mind.

To bring it back do+n to Richmond% I kno+ there are a lot of targeted individuals here% and the police

encounter them. -nd can=t understand this and help them. The medical communit is hobbled b not

having a differential diagnosis. -nd man of the pschiatric disorders% the should saK rule ou

pschotronic disorders% but the don=t. So the can=t face it at all. Thank ou.

:e#="es@ Ben Colonson

Co"onson@ I thank ou all. T+o minutes. 6ka% let=s go. Thank ou all for our endurance. I see ou listen

to a lot of humans. I=m gonna talk reall fast +ith t+o minutes to go. I am a pschologist. I have

evaluated man targeted individuals +ho have previousl been diagnosed as delusional and pschotic and

m ob is to deconstruct those diagnoses. Because of the methods of m colleagues that can actuall

detect advanced nano(technolog present in their bodies both through freDuenc emissions and

lmphaticKbasicallKlike +hen ou fire a bullet there=s a traector and the police can determine the

traector. There are chemical tests to do that. I +as ust gonna% ver Duickl% since it=s t+o minutes% this

is this month=s issue of Smithsonian #aga


61/365

t+o minutes I have to stop there. I hope ou +ill listen to these people. The are suffering greatl as non(

consensual e?perimentees.

:e#="es@ - Duestion% reall Duick% to the speaker. Could ou repeat the names of those t+o references

that ou gave% the maga-S task force% ho+

these SC->-S sstems are impacting human beings. -nd there are thousands of reports from targeted

individuals that crimes are being committed against them. -nd m intention in coming here tonight +as to

support their claims so that la+ enforcement% +ith as muchK

Ma'or@ I think she asked ou the names of the maga


62/365

piece of paper +ithout Duivering. >oes that ans+er our Duestion

Con#!" Member@ I=m tring to find out +hat=s the source.

:e#=er@ The source are these e?otic +eapons. The talk about% in 2$99% the talk about the space

+eapons% spaced(based +eapons. Basicall in that document the talk about e?otic +eapons. That=s +hat

+e=re talking about. -nd the fact of the matter is the did complete that global surveillance net+ork. #

cousin +orked for the defense department. She +orked on the global mapping of that sstem. -nd +hen I

told her +hat I +as going through% all she could sa +as% MFou=re on our o+n.N )ell% I figured that out. Ifigured that out. If ou +ould please% I urge ou to pass this. I reali


63/365

pain. I have burns all over m bod. TheKm doctor I had treated +ith for 18 ears% m legs s+elled up

from the electric magnetic freDuencies hitting me on m legsKhe told me to go to the hospital. -nd +hen I

+ent to the hospital the +ere supposed to put an I3 in me. The sent me to the mental +ard because

the said I did this to mself. I +ould never hurt me. I have been a victim since 2&&9. Fou can=t see this

horrific electric hitting ou. /lectric is invisible. Fou take a remote control to turn our tv% turn on our

television. It hurts so bad. I +ant to thank ou for opening our minds and our time toda. I am a retired

legal investigator. I have asked all m friends% I have ver prominent friends% to help me. The can=t doanthing about this. It is +a% +a over our heads. The sa it=s the shado+ government. It is people tha

cannot be touched. !lease help us.

:e#="es@ *im% ne?t speaker.

:#=ner@ "ello% m name is *imberl Buckner and I have been a targeted individual for a ver long time

The things that I=ve e?perienced due to being targeted% the have been unreal. "o+ever% I can attest that

the are ver real indeed. # life has been destroed in ever possible +a and ever da has been a

struggle for me. I am ver grateful to be before ou toda due to -m -nderson=s due diligence and to

everone else involved. I thank ou council members for giving us targeted individuals a chance to speakand to be heard. -nd I pra that these atrocities +ill soon be brought to an end. But +e need our help.

Thank ou.

:e#="es@ -le?

Ra6ter@ ;ood evening% m name is -lec Rafter. I am an ,F graduate and have spent much of m time

+orking in a financial holding compan in San 5rancisco. I have been a targeted individual for eight ears

si? months. I=m from afaette% California% +hich is in this count. I am here to support and corroborate

+hat these other speakers are tring to conve. This technolog e?ists and is being used on a mass scale

It is torturous% brutal and inhumane. It happens ever+here I go. !eople don=t understand the capabilities

of this technolog. The person I came +ith here tonight +as being shocked and stabbed in this ver room

+ith a directed energ +eapon +hile +aiting to speak +ith the council. # ears are getting freDuenc

tinnitus +hile I +as sitting here +aiting for ou as +ell as technolog called voice to skull >r. -lan 5re

ike I said% this happens ever+here I go in ,orthern and Southern California. I=ve been tortured all da%

all night% minute after minute% ear after ear after ear. )e need our help and support to stop this% to

save us% and to prevent this from happening to others. !lease support banning these so called spaced(

based +eapons. Thank ou ver much.

:e#="es@ Robert S+egan

S0ean@ ;ood evening. # name is Robert S+egan. I live in #odesto California. I=m here tonight aftebeing targeted for 12 ears +ith direct energ +eapons% voice to skull. I +ake up in the middle of the

night in e?cruciating pain. There=s nobod I can call. There=s nobod to help me. Fou kno+% sometimes

have suicidal ideali


64/365

right no+. I suspect he +as here for about ' minutes. -nd others +ill not even talk to me. # famil=s

been fragmented. I don=t tell anbod +hat=s happening to me anmore. It=s a dark secret +ith me. I

cannot e?plain to people +hat=s happening. The police in #odesto are at least talking to me no+. The=re

not taking me do+n to the mental health facilit. I thank ou ver much for listening to me.

:e#="es@ #ariln anguist

,an!st@ ;ood evening #aor and Council #embers. #ariln anguist% Richmond resident. I +ant to

thank #s -nderson for bringing this topic for+ard and for bringing so man speakers. I urge ou to adoptthis resolution. -s has been said% the original Space !reservation -ct +as originall introduced b

Congressman Cosenich% co(sponsored b Congress+oman Barbara ee and Congressman !ete Stark of the

Ba -rea. -nd this concept +as also voted on and supported unanimousl b the nited ,ations to

prohibit +eaponi


65/365

Ma'or@ ;ive it to the clerk.

Adams@ This +as taken less than & das ago at /den hospital. That=s +hen ou hear of the victim speak

of being electronicall burned. That is m 8 ear old grand(daughter. I am '$ ears old. I have 8

grandchildren and 2 great grand( children. I first and foremost +ant to sa that I thank ;od for ever one

of ou. -nd I mean literall from the bottom of m heart. I thank him for each one of ou and I thank him

for the blessings that he=s gonna bring our +a ust for addressing these issues. These issues are beond

the average ee. The average ee can=t even see it. So it=s not even +orth even talking about in thatsense. I have sent each and ever one of ou information. /verthing that I sent ou is ust +hat ou

need to kno+. But there=s one more thing left4 our local fusion center. Fou need to do some deep

research into our local fusion center. Just look it up on line. That is +here ou +ill find information% il

activities of some sort% that is going on +ithinKI=m not going to sa cit government because I can=t

pinpoint it. But ou need to look into our local fusion center. Secondl% mental health of childrenKGtimer

beepingHK.#a I finish ust t+o minutes please

Ma'or@ ,o% I think +e need to give everbod the same amount of time. Thank ou.

Adams@ 6ka% no problem.

:e#="es@ That +as the last speaker.

Ma'or4 Glad asked to speakH #a=am% ou kno+% if ou didn=t sign up ou can=t speak. 6ka% I have 3ice#aor #eers.

V!#e Ma'or@ I +as ust gonna briefl sa that the +eaponi


66/365

)ars is not a particularl bad idea% the +hole idea is that ou can knock out someone=s +eapons before

the enter our air space% in fact% long before the enter our air space. -nd this% for e?ample% +as

practiced more than 2& ears ago% in the ;ulf )ar% +hen the !atriot sstem modification of this +as used

+hen the !atriot sstem knocked out some of the IraDi missiles that +ere launched at Israel. -nd it is not

ust a perfectl valid sstem% it is actuall a particularl useful sstem% in the time that +e have no+

+here there are nations that are not Duite as +ell armed as the Soviet nion used to be in the 1$:&s

)hich ma not have the capabilit to launch tremendous numbers of missiles at an one time. -nd% infact% this is a fairl useful sstem to have. -nd so this automatic knee erk reaction that because Reagan

supported Star )ars and at the time it +as considered a bad idea and so for that purpose it is considered

a bad idea forever% I ust think this is a +rong understanding of the sstem. -nd I ust +anted to mention

that.

Ma'or@ So +e have Council #ember #caughlin ne?t.

M#,a8"!n@ So% I ustKthe reason I +as interrupting because I don=t think +e should get into it. That=s

kind of +a off base. I +as ust giving the histor of this in general. I +ill sa that there +ere some of us

in the :&s that +ere talking about a nuclear free


67/365

Ma'or@ )ell% let me% I think he=s bringing up a good point% because% I=m reall confused. I think that the

resolution itself is ver simple. It simpl sas% Mthe cit of Richmond thereb supports the Space

!reservation -ct and companion Space !reservation Treat to ensure that individuals +ill not be targets o

spaced(based +eapons. So I see that. -ll the testimon I=ve heard tonight is about targeted individuals.

-nd so% I mean% I=m confused. Is this about spaced(based +eapons or is it about targeted individuals -nd

if individuals are targeted% +ho=s targeting them and +h I ust don=t understand it.

:e#="es@ It=s simple enough. It=s saing that% on the thereforeKas ou read% +e are supporting this Space!reservation -ct and companion Space !reservation Treat and the reason +e=re doing this is tha

individuals +ill not be targets of spaced(based +eapons% +hich is +hat the=re saing. -ll this stuff is high

technolog% itsKand soKthat=s +hat +e=re adopting here. -nd ou kno+% +hether ou believe it or not% one

thing that +as ver clear% and I=ve met +ith folks a lot around this issue% and some of them I=m ust

hearing tonight. -nd even the ones I heard tonight% ust out of compassion for folks that are saing Mhelp

usN% and us supporting this% b adopting this resolution% I think it sends out a message that% ou kno+% +e

smpathion=t

complicate it. It=s simple% so vote it es or no.

Ma'or@ I smpathi


68/365

:e#="es@ Council #ember !inpla ,o. The motion passes '(2 +ith Council #ember !inpla voting no

and #aor Butt voting no.

:ates@ 6ne reason I voted for it +as there +asn=t one speaker in opposition of it.





69/365

Facebook

Twitter More

mond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based wea... http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-r

6/5/2016





70/365

Richmond: Space weapons resolution prompts requests toinvestigate

By Karina Ioffee [email protected]

East Bay Times

Posted:Mon Jun 01 18:42:20 MDT 2015

RICHMOND -- A city resolution banning space weapons within city limits has prompted dozens of calls to the Richmond Police

Department in recent days to ask the agency to investigate the alleged use of chips, bugs and other devices for mind and body

control.

On May 19, the City Council approved a resolution supporting the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty

permanently banning "space-based weapons," such as microchips planted in people's bodies and micro waves that supporters

believe are used by nefarious sources to harm them.

The resolution was written by Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles, who works as a mental health specialist for Contra Costa County,

and aimed at "making all Richmond residents feel safe," she said.

"I don't intend to ignore the concerns from residents who say they have been exposed to these attacks that have caused them great

emotional and bodily harm," Beckles said.

The fallout has prompted worries that Richmond, which is working hard to remold its image in recent years, will be dismissed as

slightly off by the news media and other municipalities.

" I am trying to figure out how we can use this newfound fame to help market Richmond, much as desolate eastern Nevada has

used the Extraterrestrial Highway to lure tourists to an otherwise deserted stretch of desert highway," joked Richmond Mayor Tom

Butt in a recent online posting.

But the issue actually started last June, when Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan was asked by Beckles to meet with residents who

said they were being targeted by space technology. Eager to show the department was sensitive to residents' concerns, Gagan

agreed.

"My desire was how to better serve this population from a public safety standpoint," said Gagan, a 20-year veteran with the

department. "There are people who have a huge amount of stress, anxiety and fear. These issues have public safety implications

no matter how far-fetched they seem."

The meeting had the best of intentions. But it appears to have also motivated conspiracy theorists who began to see the city as an

ally. Gagan began receiving invitations to speak at conferences organized by the "targeted individuals" community, and a rumor

started that the city had a task force devoted to uncovering government conspiracies. One organization even gave Gagan a

"humanitarian award" for his work on the issue.

"People were thrilled that someone was finally listening to them," Gagan said.

Since that meeting, he estimates that he's received more than 100 calls from people from as far away as Ireland who say they want

Richmond police to investigate their particular situations. Gagan always takes the time to explain that the department looks at factsand has so far found no evidence to support concerns raised by callers.

"We try to refocus the conversation, and if they are local, get them into a managed program of medication and supervision," Gagan

said.

Contact Karina Ioffee at 510-262-2726 or [email protected]. Follow her at Twitter.com/kioffee

http://www.eastbaytimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print

6/5/2016





71/365

Stan J. CaterboneADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom From

Covert Harassment & Srve!""an#e$%


()*+ Fremont Street,an#aster$ PA (-+/


CORRO:ORA5ING E4PER5 AND FORMER NSA 7HIS5,E:,O7ER ;AREN S5E7AR5

DISC,OSURE OF E,EC5ROGAGNE5IC 7EAPONS USED 5O ;I,, CER5AIN5ARGE5ED INDIVIDUA,S DURING APRI, (+$ )+( RADIO IN5ERVIE7

5HE DISC,OSURE

*aren Ste+art graduated from 5lorida State niversit in 1$9$ +ith a BS degree in ;erman anguage

and a minor or co(maor eDuivalent in 5ine -rt. She +orked for ,S- G,ational Securit -gencH from

1$:2 to 2&1&. "er resume +ill follo+.

"er video intervie+s can be seen on the follo+ing F6TB/ links4

)heel of 5reedom G)-H LL18 /?(,S- *aren Ste+art

https4LL+++.outube.comL+atchvQ/?pC29ft1&

,S- +histle blo+er *aren Ste+art e?poses targeted Individuals% $L11

https4LL+++.outube.comL+atchvQrav0ai8nf#g

6n #arch $% 2&18 I +as detained and falsel imprisoned b no less than : ,S- Securit !oliceon the barracks of the "eadDuarters of the ,S- at 5t. #eade #arland. I +as handcuffed% and

interrogated for over an hour% +hile m car +as dog sniffed and searched. I +as ordered to return to

ancaster rather than continue on to )ashington% >.C.% and +as ordered not to enter an federall

o+ned propert again. The follo+ing is a video of m statement4

Statement and 3ideo of 5alse Imprisonment re "andcuffed and Interrogation for an hour at ,S-




http://www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com/mailto:[email protected]://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttp://www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com/mailto:[email protected]://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhs


72/365

"eadDuarters G,ational Securit -genc at 5t. #eade% #arlandH b : ,S- !olice officers on #arch $%

2&1' Recorded on #arch 11% 2&18

https4LL+++.outube.comL+atchvQ5e0lan',hs

*aren Ste+art@s resume at the ,S- is as follo+s4 MI )orked various proects over the ears% not

ust SSRLRussia% but various countries researchingLreporting on foreign militar status and alliances%

+eapons development and proliferation% the Chernobl disaster and aftermath% the fall of the Iron

Curtain and changing relations among ne+l liberated countries% economic and diplomatic

developments of certain target countries. I researched and +rote a series of intelligence reports in

support of 6peration IraDi 5reedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to IraD from

+reaking havoc on the -merican invasion. This ultimatel is +hat got me fired because I Duestioned

+h m +ork +as used to promote another emploee +ho had no e?perience +ith but% +as credited

+ith m +orkN .

The follo+ing transcript of an intervie+ b *aren Ste+art in +hich she describes the lethal

electromagnetic +eapons and her e?perience on being on the receiving end +as taken from the article

titled MNSA 78!st"eb"o0er Comes Ot o6 t8e S8ado0s Into t8e ,!8tB and #an be 6ond at@

8tt1@#anada6ree1ress.#omart!#"ensa?08!st"eb"o0er?#omes?ot?o6?t8e?s8ado0s?!nto?

t8e?"!8t

The article +as +ritten b Sher Eieve (( Bio and -rchives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is

as follows: In February, 2014 I published an iner!iew of an "#$ %hisleblower . This is a follow&up oha colu'n. (ue o recen hreas o her person and oher e)i*en circu'sances, he %hisleblower

has decided o co'e ou of he shadows and ino he li*h. I a' honored ha she a*ain chose 'e o

wrie her sory.

;AREN S5E7AR5S 5RANSCRIP5

M5irst of all% the case ST/)-RT 3. ,S- is a MrighteousN la+suit% Gbrought in 2&1&H meaning it is a

clear case of emploer abuse of po+er and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal

level meant to circumvent +histleblo+er protection la+s like the ,o 5ear -ct. Simpl put% I asked the

,S- Inspector ;eneral GI;H to investigate +h m a+ard(+inning intelligence report series supporting

6peration IraDi 5reedom G2&&H +as used to promote an entirel different +oman t+ice G2&& A 2&&'H

one +ho had nothing to do +ith m reports +hatsoever% and +as a kno+n incompetent% but had

methodicall se?uall compromised man of the male managers +ithin the )eapons A Space G)ASH

>irectorate. Instead of follo+ing correct procedure% the I; and ,S- Securit decided to cover up the




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttp://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-the-lighthttp://canadafreepress.com/members/1/SherZieve/160http://canadafreepress.com/article/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruptionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhshttp://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-the-lighthttp://canadafreepress.com/members/1/SherZieve/160http://canadafreepress.com/article/exclusive-former-nsa-employee-speaks-out-on-its-corruption


73/365

infraction b attacking me. Threats +ere made to paint m complaint as Mparanoid Mand to fire me for a

non(e?istent mental illness if I did not drop m effort to get credit for and the promotion for m o+n

+ork% given to the +rong +oman. These threats Duickl took shape as false accusations against me b

the guilt personnel obviousl coached b Securit% manifested +ith stalking harassment masDuerading

as an MinvestigationN b ,S- Securit goons from 2&&8(2&&$. In late 2&1&% despite all evidence

sho+ing m innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges% I +as fired b an ,S- *angaroo court+ith a predetermined agenda. # //6C appeal Gla+suitH had been accepted for adudication and the

udge had ordered no adverse action until its adudication but ,S- ignored his orders.

I moved from Columbia% #arland back to m famil=s hometo+n of Tallahassee% 5lorida in 2&11.

-ll +as Duiet until 5ebruar 2&1' +hen I instructed the la+ firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from

the #arland >epartment of #otor 3ehicles identifing a burglar Ga no+ retired ,S- /?ecutiveH +ho had

broken into m home ver shortl after I had tried to make m 2&&8 Inspector ;eneral reDuest for an

investigation% and stolen e?tra house% car% and mail kes as +ell as illegall bugging Gburst bugH our

home and phoneLinternet to facilitate further harassment and likel search for blackmail material Gnoluck for them thereH.

-fter the subpoena% I began noticing Securit tpes in Tallahassee follo+ing me and photo(

stalking me b #archL-pril. Their license plates suggested ,aval Securit ;roup from !ensacola and

,S- Securit personnel from ;eorgia G-ugustaH and Te?as GSan -ntonioH. - Duick check +ith the eon

Count Sheriff=s >epartment% specificall >ut 6fficer deput Canon% confirmed that ,S- also had

personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the !hipps propert north of

ake Jackson Gnear +here I no+ liveH for a Msecret e?erciseN% ust before the second round of stalking

harassment began. The seDuence of events seems to have been for ,S- Securit to contact the ,aval

Securit ;roup in !ensacola%

Superior Court 1915 MDA 2015 Petition for Allowance to Pa Supreme Court of June 6, 2016

Documents

Transcript of Superior Court 1915 MDA 2015 Petition for Allowance to Pa Supreme Court of June 6, 2016