SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

21
SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012

Transcript of SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Page 1: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

SUPA KT

Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board

April 2012

Page 2: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

SUPA KT

1 Review 20112 Strategy 2012

Page 3: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Strategic Aim of SUPA KT

“..to increase engagement between SUPA and industrial

partners for financial and economic benefit”

Page 4: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

The Team

Page 5: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Addressing the Strategic Goals

• Deliver specific industry programmes (by SUPA KT team)

• Investigate and inform research groups of relevant industrial market information and un-met needs

• Encourage and enable increased collaborative research activities with industrial partners – TSB, FP7, KTP

• Facilitate or support direct commercialisation activity (spin out, licensing, Fraunhofer, Innovation Centre, Innovation Centres)

“..to increase engagement between SUPA and industrial partners for financial and economic benefit”

Page 6: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Specific Programmes

• Delivered tailored technical programmes (“SUPA starts”)to over 30 companies and direct general support to over 80 companies from all SUPA partners

• Draft external evaluation shows £1.9m of added revenue already generated by SMEs as a consequence of project with projections of £6m

• Has created significant follow-on work – SUPA start to SUPA start plus, KTP and so on

SEEKIT/ERDF Project for Scottish SME support

£1.9m additional revenue already attributable to project

Page 7: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Specific Programmes

• 14 fully-funded industrial studentships with companies with Scottish R&D presence

• (in process of) placing 9 industry academic exchanges

• Has created significant follow-on work (studentship > placement > SUPA start)

INSPIRE(PaLS-related)

Page 8: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Investigate and Inform”

• Review status of market, identify key companies and policies, investigate main un-met needs

• Disseminate information throughout SUPA

• Analyse findings with key research groups in SUPA

• Agree areas where a potential “Offering” can be made to industry

• Broker engagement

Market sector reviews –

Page 9: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Investigate and Inform”

• Comprehensive market report produced and made available (on SUPA website)

• Met 8 companies throughout UK, as well as key government agencies

• 6 specific collaborative projects have been followed up – 3 confirmed contracts have resulted so far

• Better-informed SUPA community

Market sector reviews –

DEFENCE SENSING

Page 10: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Investigate and Inform”

• Same sequence of activities carried out and report published on SUPA website

• Collaboration with SINAPSE for industrial leads

• Less engagement (than for defence sensing) by SUPA so far

• Scottish Enterprise have adopted market review

Market sector reviews –

MEDICAL IMAGING

Page 11: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Investigate and Inform”

• Opportunity study carried out and disseminated

• Led to specific analysis of financial and operating models for proposed SCAPA facility

Market sector reviews –

SCAPA

Page 12: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Encourage and Enable”• Increased participation in policy

formulation - eg 3 SUPA representatives at European Technology Platform workshops Photonics 21

• Disseminate information on calls specifically targeted throughout SUPA

• Actively broker collaborations and partnerships

• Through PEER, specifically target Scottish SME participation in FP7

Collaborative Research Programmes – FP7, TSB

Page 13: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Encourage and Enable”• PEER (started 3 months ago), follow

up with 12 companies, three new partnerships created, 1 application, 2 in development for future call

• Now responding to advance notice from Photonics 21 of forthcoming call (May) for Biophotonics ERA-NET

• Recent TSB “Technology-inspired collaborative R&D” call – 9 bids from all Scottish Unis – 2 assisted from SUPA KT

Collaborative Research Programmes – FP7, TSB

Page 14: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

“Facilitate and Support”• Development of Fraunhofer – identification of

industry need, maximise benefits to SUPA• Working with SUPA REF group to maximise impact

from impact statements • “Enhanced” STFC PIPPS fellowship (pending

appointment) – seeking commercial application for SUPA STFC-funded programmes

• Individual project support and development • Contributed to development and achievement of

SELEX chair at H-W• Entrepreneurial training for early-stage researchers• Support of SU2P and other complementary initiatives

A range of commercialisation and culture-change activities

Page 15: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

SUPA Commercial Income (£k)actual v target

SUPA TotalSUPA Target

Income to SUPA from Industry (HESA figures)

Page 16: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Industrial Income to SUPA – National Comparison

• Summed income over last 7 years – SUPA has 4 universities in UK top 10

• Cambridge dominates UK industrial income - Strathclyde 2nd in UK in 2010-11, overtaking Imperial College

• This is despite context of BERD in Scotland being about 45% that of UK as a whole

Page 17: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Business Enterprise R&D Spend (BERD)

Page 18: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Summary of Position

• Relatively strong commercial engagement in UK terms despite low concentration of industrial R&D spend in Scotland

• Increasing engagement with SME community with significant economic benefit resulting

• Increased effort into participation in TSB & FP7

Page 19: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Where We Aspire To Be

• Strong REF Impact, now and future• More commercial/entrepreneurial

culture within SUPA• More national and international

commercial engagements• Larger, sustainable, collaborative

contracts

Page 20: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Key Strategic Elements 2012

More national and international commercial engagements

• More resource in active marketing/relationship building in TSB and FP7

• Develop international opportunities through SU2P and SFC exchanges

Page 21: SUPA KT Presentation to the SUPA International Advisory Board April 2012.

Key Strategic Elements 2012

Larger, more sustainable engagements

Build on to strengths – eg, seek support for creation of Innovation Centre – working with largest companies in Scotland as well as supply chain and end users.