Sunray Independent School District

Sunray Independent School Sunray Independent School DistrictDistrict

20092009

AEISAEIS

Performance Performance Report Report

District and Campus Ratings

District Acceptable

High School Recognized

Middle School Acceptable

Elementary Recognized

2008/2009 Comparison of TAKS Results Subgroups

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

09LA/Read 09Math 09Sci

DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk

2008/2009 Comparison TAKS Results Subgroups

0

1020

3040

5060

7080

90100

09 Writing 08 Writing 09 SS 08 SS

DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk

2009 TAKS Results Compared to State & Region Results

010

2030

4050

6070

80

90100

LA/Read Math Writing Science SS

StateRegion 16District

3rd Grade

0

1020

3040

5060

7080

90100

Reading Math Writing

3rd-033rd-043rd-053rd-063rd-073rd-083rd -09

4th Grade Longitudinal

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Reading Math Writing Science

3rd-084th-09


01020

3040

5060

7080

90100


3rd-074th-085th-09


70

75

80

85

90

95

100


3rd-064th-075th-086th-09


0

10

2030

4050

6070

8090

100


3rd-054th-065th-076th-087th-09


0

10

2030

4050

6070

8090

100

Reading Math Writing Science SS

3rd-044th-055th-066th-077th-088th-09


50

60

70

80

90

100


3rd-034th-045th-056th-067th-078th-089th-09


50

60

70

80

90

100


4th -035th -046th-057th-068th-079th-0810th-09


50

60

70

80

90

100

Reading Math Science Writing SS

5th-036th-047th-058th-069th-0710th-0811th-09

2009 State Testing Participation

0102030405060708090

100

Total TAKS T-Acc T-M T-Alt Combo

StateRegionDistrict

Texas Projection Measure• Texas Projection Measure (TPM), a growth measure that

will be used by Texas to determine whether students are meeting annual performance goals.

• Growth measures track individual student achievement on state tests from one year to the next, giving schools credit for student improvement over time. The Texas Education Agency developed the TPM as a measure for use in its federal and state accountability systems.

• Once the TPM becomes available for use in determining state and federal accountability ratings, districts and schools will then have an opportunity to receive credit for students who did not meet passing standards on state tests, but who demonstrate they are projected to pass in a subsequent year.

2009 TPM Compared to State & Region Results

010

2030

4050

6070

80

90100

LA/Read Math Writing Science SS

StateRegion 16District

Criteria for meeting AYP:

1. AYP performance requirements are met if the percent Met Standard for all students and each student group summed across grades 3-8 and 10 in reading/language arts and mathematics meets or exceeds AYP standard.

• The AYP standards for 2007-2008 are 67% for reading/ELA and 58% for Math.

• The AYP standards gradually increase.

• By 2013-2014, the standards are 100 percent for both reading/language arts and mathematics.

2. AYP participation requires 95 percent of all students and each student group to be tested to meet participation requirements, calculated separately for reading & math.

3. Other AYP requirements must be met for all students: 70% graduation rates for high schools and 90% attendance rates for middle and elementary schools.

District & Campus AYP

• Meets AYP and Participation

TELPAS – At Least One Proficiency Level Increase in

English Reading

• 3rd -5th 8/24 33.3%

• 6th-8th 3/8 37.5%

• 9-11th 2/11* 18.1%

(*5 beginner students moved in)

TELPAS - % LEP with Advanced /Advanced High Rating in English

Reading

• 3rd-5th 33.3%• 6th-8th 0%• 9-12th 27.2%Advanced –High

• 3rd-5th 25%• 6th-8th 87.5%• 9-12th 41.1%

Advanced

ESL Students Exited from Program

Grades 3 - 5 5 students

Grades 6 - 8 1 students

Grades 9 -11 3 students

Attendance Rates

90

95

100

State

Region16Sunray

02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08• State 95.6 95.7 95.7 95.5 95.5 95.5• Region 16 95.6 95.8 95.7 95.6 95.7 95.5• Sunray 96.8 97.3 96.7 96.9 96.3 96.2

7th and 8th Drop-out Rate

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

'07-08 '06-07

State Region16 Sunray

'07-08 '06-07State 0.3 0.2Region16 0.2 0.2Sunray 0 0

Grades 7-12 Drop-out Rate

0

1

2

3

4

5

'07-08 '06-07


'07-08 '06-07State 2.2 2.7Region16 1.8 1.7Sunray .7 1.4

Completion Rate

05

101520253035404550556065707580859095

100

State Region District

Grad. 06Grad. 07Grad. 08GED 06GED 07GED 08HS 06HS 07HS 08DO -4yr. 06DO-4yr. 07DO-4 yr.08

% in Advanced Courses• 2005 2006 2007 2008• State 20.5 21.0 22.1 23.1• Region16 17.7 17.7 18.3 18.8• Sunray 23.2 24.1 14.7 14.7

0

5

10

15

20

25

2005 2006 2007 2008


RHSP/DAP Graduates

• 2008– State 81.4– ESC 16 79.3– Sunray 94.6

• 2007– State 77.9– ESC 16 74.7– Sunray 87.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2008 2007

State

ESC 16

Sunray

TSI – Higher Education Readiness Component

2009• English

– State 63– ESC 16 58– Sunray 62

• Math– State 62– ESC 16 59– Sunray 67

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

English Math

State

ESC 16

Sunray

SAT/ACT TEST DATA

2007 2008

STATE REGION16 SUNRAY

SAT Mean Score

992 987

1043 1034

* *

ACT Mean

Score 20.2 20.5

20.3 20.3

20.1 21.1

Violence and Criminal Incident Report

• Sunray ISD did not have any activity or actions that would be deemed violent or criminal in nature .

2007 Graduates Attending Higher Education in Fall 2007

• Total Graduates 30• Amarillo College 7• West Texas A&M 5• Other 4 year Inst. 3• Other 2 year Inst. 2• Not trackable 3• Not found 10• Total Known Attending 17

District Gold Acknowledgements

• Attendance 2007-2008

• College-Ready Graduates – 2008

• Recommended High School Program -2008

• Texas Success Initiative – ELA/Mathematics

Sunray Elementary

AEIS

2009

Subject

Year

State SES Hisp White Sp Ed

Eco D LEP

Reading 2009

90% 86% 76% 94% 76% 50%

Reading

2008

89% 86% 73% 99% * 71% 56%

Reading 2007

89% 91% 84% 99% * 89% 57%

Math

2009

86% 72% 71% 72% * 62% 50%

Math

2008

85% 67% 36% 90% * 38% 25%

Math 2007

82% 70% 63% 79% * 61% 29%

SES TAKS Data from AEISGrade 3

Comments for Previous Slide

• Reading stayed the same and a slight increase in the following sub-categories: Hispanic and Economic Disadvantage.

• Math had an increase overall and a substantial increase in the following sub-categories: Hispanic, LEP, and the Economic Disadvantage. However the White sub-category had a significant decrease.

Subject. State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Reading 2009

86% 70% 53% 86% 55% 38%

Reading 2008

85% 85% 82% 88% * 78% 67%

Reading 2007

84% 87% 88% 86% * 85% *

Math 2009

88% 71% 53% 82% * 55% 25%

Math 2008

87% 91% 94% 89% * 84% 83%

Math 2007

86% 87% 94% 79% * 92% *


.

Subject. State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Writing 2009

92% 86% 67% 99% 82% 50%

Writing 2008

93% 94% 99% 88% * 94% 99%

Writing 2007

91% 80% 75% 86% * 77% *


Comments for Previous Slides

• Reading and Math we had significant drops overall and the following sub-categories: Hispanic, LEP, and Economic Disadvantage.

• Writing had a slight drop overall and in the sub-category of Economic Disadvantage. Had a significant drop in the following sub-categories: Hispanic and LEP.

SES Attendance Data from AEIS

Attendance State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

07-08 95.5% 96.2% 96.8% 95.9% 94.9% 96.3% 97%

06-07 95.5% 96.3% 96.3% 96.1% 97.0% 95.9% 95.9%

Decrease

Increase0.0% -0.1% +0.5% +0.8% -2.1% +0.4% +1.1%

Summary: Attendance slightly decreased overall for the campus but it did increase in the following sub-categories of Hispanic. LEP, and Economic Disadvantage. Attendance decreased for the following sub-categories of White and Sp Ed.

Strategies for Attendance Improvement

• Attendance Incentive Program

• CAT Monitoring

• Parent Notification

• Saturday School and Summer School

Strategies for TAKS Improvement

• Use of Released Tests • Practice testing on computerized assessment

to diagnosis during the school year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• Reading Specialist and Intensive Instruction• Accelerated Reading Instruction (before &

after school)• Accelerated Math Instruction (before & after

school)

Continuation from Previous Page

• Study Island

• My Reading Coach

• I-Station

• Symphony Math

• CraftPlus Writing Program

• Region 4 Materials Reading and Math

SUNRAY MIDDLE SCHOOL

2008-2009

AEIS information

Subject

Year

State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Reading 07 83% 87% 71% 99% NA 75% NA

Reading 08 85% 96% 93% 99% NA 99% NA

Reading 09 85% 82% 78% 88% NA 80% NA

Math 07 82% 86% 78% 99% NA 73% NA

Math 08 86% 90% 80% 99% NA 91% NA

Math 09 92% 91% 94% 88% NA 93% NA

Science 07 74% 82% 73% 89% NA 78% NA

Science 08 82% 94% 87% 99% NA 92% NA

Science 09 85% 80% 72% 88% NA 75% NA

SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 5

Grade 5 Summary: Reading scores decreased in all groups this year. Math scores were primarily up and Science scores were primarily down compared to previous years. We will continue to work on all areas. We will be working with all groups to keep those scores going up.

Subject

Year


Reading 07 92% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA

Reading 08 94% 94% 93% 94% NA 94% NA

Reading 09 93% 96% 94% 99% NA 99% NA

Math 07 80% 79% 67% 99% NA 67% NA

Math 08 83% 91% 87% 94% NA 81% NA

Math 09 82% 96% 94% 99% NA 99% NA


Grade 6 Summary: Reading and Math scores went up across the board, while the state averages went down.

Subject

Year


Reading 07 85% 89% 84% 93% NA 82% NA

Reading 08 88% 97% 94% 99% NA 93% NA

Reading 09 87% 86% 82% 90% NA 79% NA

Math 07 77% 91% 95% 89% NA 91% NA

Math 08 80% 79% 71% 92% NA 69% NA

Math 09 82% 73% 59% 85% NA 58% NA

Writing 07 93% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA

Writing 08 93% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA

Writing 09 94% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA


Grade 7 Summary: The biggest area that we need work in continues to be Math. We must continue to build the Math skills needed.

Subject Year State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Reading 07 89% 88% 91% 85% NA 82% NA

Reading 08 95% 98% 99% 96% NA 99% NA

Reading 09 97% 97% 95% 99% NA 93% NA

Math 07 73% 81% 86% 75% NA 73% NA

Math 08 79% 85% 82% 86% NA 82% NA

Math 09 87% 84% 75% 99% NA 73% NA

S. St. 07 84% 86% 78% 95% NA 78% 20%

S. St. 08 91% 91% 94% 90% NA 99% NA

S. St. 09 92% 94% 91% 99% NA 80% NA

Science 08 69% 87% 82% 90% NA 89% NA

Science 09 73% 74% 61% 99% NA 63% NA


Grade 8 Summary: Reading was right at state average and down a little from the year before. We stayed about where we were in Math with one group going up and two going down. We also jumped a little in Social Studies with one group going up and two going down. Science represents a significant need as our average and all groups but one were down.

SMS Attendance Data from AEIS

Attendance State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

06-07 95.5% 96.6% 96.7% 96.5% 95.9% 96.1% 96.9%

07-08 95.5% 96.7% 96.7% 96.7% 96.2% 96.7% 97.0%

Decrease (-)

Increase (+)Even +.1% Even +.2% +.3% +.6% +.1%

We would like for these to increase each year. These are a little higher from previous years. Received Gold Performance for Attendance.


• Attendance Incentive Program with recognition every six weeks for perfect attendance.

• Office contacts parents

• Focused data analysis to place incentives

• Saturday School


• Use of Released Tests• Use of TAKS Practice Materials including Measuring

Up for Math and Science.• New Reading Plus program that monitors student’s

basic skill level across 11 domains and 25 advanced domains that correlate directly to TAKS.

• Implementation of MySatori, a web-based assessment tool that provides focused assessment for individual student expectations.

• Implementation of SuccessMaker, a computer program that diagnoses a student’s learning shortfalls and then prescribes instruction and assessment for each student as it raises their level of achievement.

• Use of Bobcat Breakout for those students struggling and falling behind in classroom assignments.

Sunray Middle School

Gold Performance Acknowledgements:Attendance 2007-2008WritingSocial Studies

Sunray High SchoolAEIS Data

2008-2009

Subject

Year

State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed

Eco D LEP

Reading Reading 20082008

87%87% 95%95% 90%90% 99%99% NANA 89%89% NANA

Reading 2009

91%% 91%% 84%% 96%% NA 88%% NA

Math 2008

64% 78% 75% 81% NA 79% NA

Math 2009

71% 89% 89% 89% NA 88% NA

2009 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS

Grade 9 Summary: Overall reading scores the same as the state. Unfortunately, all subgroups are down this year in reading. Math scores were up by 11% overall from last year with the Hispanic subgroup up by 14%. Math scores are still not at the 80 & 90 percentage levels yet in all subgroups and overall, which is the aim for each testing period.

Grade 9

Subject. State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

ELA 08 89% 98% 94% 99% NA 92% 99%

ELA 09 90% 89% 83% 95% NA 86% NA

Math 08 66% 72% 53% 89% NA 67% 20%

Math 09 69% 74% 65% 85% NA 76% NA

Sci 08 65% 66% 41% 86% NA 54% 20%

Sci 09 67% 66% 65% 75% NA 67% NA

SS 08 89% 87% 71% 99% NA 77% 40%

SS 09 91% 93% 87% 99% NA 86% NA

2009 SHS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 10

Grade 10 Summary: Social Studies continues to be a strength. ELA had significant drops overall. Science and Math core areas both had growth in the Hispanic and Econ. Disadv. Groups. The White subgroup dropped in all areas except Social Studies.. All of the scores at the 10th grade need to be raised to the 80 and 90 percentage levels.

2009 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS

Subject

State SHS Hisp. White Sp Ed Eco Dis

LEP

ELA 08 91% 90% 83% 95% NA 90% NA

ELA 09 93% 97% 94% 99% NA 91% NA

Math 08 80% 89% 82% 95% NA 80% NA

Math 09 82% 86% 76% 95% NA 80% NA

Sci 08 81% 83% 74% 91% NA 64% NA

Sci 09 86% 86% 71% 99% NA 64% NA

SS 08 95% 95% 89% 99% NA 82% NA

SS 09 97% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA

Grade 11

Grade 11 Summary: ELA was UP overall. Social Studies saw gains overall and in all subgroups. Both of these core areas have all groups in the 80 and 90 percentage levels. The Science area was up overall, and Math remained the same overall. Math had drops in the Hispanic and the campus. Our Hispanic and Econ. Disadv. groups continue to be lower than the other subgroups. Science scores, which have been a concern continue to have gains each year at the exit level.

2009 SHS Attendance Data from AEIS

NOTE: This is not current-year data. AEIS reports attendance behind other AEIS data.

Attendance State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

06-07 95.5% 96.4% 96.1% 96.8% 95.8% 96.0% 96.0%

07-08 95.5% 96.2% 96.0% 96.4% 93.7% 95.7% 95.5%

Decrease

Increase0.0% -0.2% -0.1% -0.4% -2.1% -0.3% -0.5%

Summary: We want these percentages to increase each year. There were slight decreases overall both last year and this year except the Sp Ed subgroup that had a 2.1% loss last year. Need to get the decreases to be increases. We want to stay above the 95% level.

SHS Completion Rate Data from 2009 AEISNote: This is not current-year data. It is reported behind other AEIS data.

Completion

Rate 2008State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP

Grad. 79.1% 100% 100% 100% NA 100% NA

GED 1.5% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

Cont. HS 8.9% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

DO (4-yr) 10.5% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA

Completion Rate 2007

Grad 78.0% 91.2% 85.0% 100% NA 88.9% 40%

GED 2.0% 0% 0.0% 0% NA 0% 0%

Cont. HS 8.7% 2.9% 5.0% 0% NA 5.6% 20%

DO (4-yr) 11.4% 5.9% 10.0% 0% NA 5.6% NA

Summary: Our completion rate is UP from 2007.


• Attendance Incentive Program• Exemption Policy• Bobcat Scholarship• SCAT Monitoring• Parent Notification for Absences• Saturday School and Summer School• STAR Program• Learning Lab for Makeup Work & Extra Support• Morning and Afternoon Tutorials for Failures, Makeup

Work and Extra Support for Coursework

Strategies for Completion Rate Dropout Improvement

• Timely Identification of At Risk• TAKS Remediation & Intensive Instruction• Saturday School for Attendance Problems• Credit Recovery and Credit Accrual in Summer

School and Saturday School• SCAT Monitoring & Intervention Plans• CHAMPS Academy• Dropout Recovery with GED and CHAMPS• WBL Program To Support Students Who Need To

Work• Personal Graduation Plans for At Risk• Priority of Services for Migrant Students

Strategies for TAKS Improvement• Use of Nova Net, Study Island, MySatori, &

Other Computer- Assisted Programs• Analysis/Use of Released State Tests• Use of TEA TAKS Study Guides• Practice /Benchmark Testing Days for

Diagnosis of Strong and Weak Areas at Mid-Year

• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• 1-on-1 Intensive Instruction for TAKS ELL

Failures• TAKS Class for Senior Retakers & for Juniors &

Sophomores Who Failed TAKS• TAKS Intervention Period for 10th TAKS Failures • Summer TAKS Class Before July Testing


• TAKS Conferences with Students on Objectives Failed• Individual Conferences with Parents of Students Who

Failed TAKS for Input on Personal Graduation Plan• Personal Graduation Plans for TAKS Failures• Daily and/or Weekly TAKS Drills in Core Subject Classes• Individual Educational Plans for Students Who Are ELL • Placement in Core Area Class for Senior Retakers and

All Juniors Who Failed TAKS• Intervention for ELL Students for Lang. Dev. Skills

Needed for TAKS Testing & for Coursework Assistance

Accomplishments at SHSFocus on Student Service Projects

• Student Council Dinner for Senior Citizens & Blood Drive

• FCCLA Reading with Elementary, Ronald McDonald House Supply Drive, Eveline Rivers Coat Drive

• NHS Meals on Wheels & Raising money for a student in need

• FFA raising money for a student in need• SHS Jr./Sr. Mentoring Program at Elementary and

Middle Schools• Cheerleaders Service Projects Through Relay for Life

& MS Walk• GT canned food drive for needy families

Sunray High School Gold Performance Acknowledgements

2008-2009

Attendance (2007-2008) College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2008) Recommended High School Program (Class or

2008) Texas Success Initiative (TSI) ELA Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Mathematics Comparable Improvement: Reading/ELA and

Mathematics

2009 Accountability Rating

Recognized

Student Demographics• Ethnicity 2008 2009

African American .4 .4Hispanic 50.0 50.2White 49.1 48.5Native American .2 .2Asian/Pacific Islander .4 .7

• Economically Disadvantaged 44.9 46.9

• Limited English Proficient15.5 15.4

• At-Risk 31.8 41.9

Staff Data

Sunray State

• Years Exper. 11.7 11.4– In District 6.9 7.4

• Turnover Rate 17.2 14.7

• # Teachers 55.5 327,622.9

Average Class Sizes

• District– K 17.5– 1 14.0– 2 17.1– 3 12.8– 4 16.7– 5 12.0– 6 15.3

• State– K 19.0– 1 19.0– 2 19.3– 3 19.3– 4 19.7– 5 22.1– 6 21.5

Enrollment Projections

• 1998-99 622• 1999-00 587• 2000-01 544• 2001-02 528• 2002-03 498• 2003-04 493• 2004-05 525• 2005-06 537• 2006-07 543• 2007-08 542• 2008-09 540• 2009-10 535475

525

575

62598-9999-0000-01'01-02'02-03'03-04'04-05'05-06'06-07'07-08'08-09'09-10

Budget HistoryYear Revenue Expenditure00/01 3,488,232 3,551,87301/02 4,869,628 4,290,25302/03 4,202,696 4,405,52603/04 3,912,864 3,735,21704/05 5,034,355 4,365,89905/06 5,173,849 4,700,58306/07 6,927,724 5,932,08007/08 5,761,499 5,597,03108/09 5,803,187 5,720,80509/10 5,675,167* 5,672,756*Estimated *

Year Tax Rate Value Budget Results

00/01 1.536 162,618,685 - 63,641

01/02 1.571 210,135,837 579,375**

02/03 1.572 206,049,618 202,830 **

03/04 1.6404 201,962,265 177,647

04/05 1.6158 244,818,720 668,456 **

05/06 1.5885 294,557,066 669,240**

06/2007 1.4449 338,947,816 995,644

07/2008 1.1483 322,679,875 119,468

08/2009 1.13 400,026,195 57,382

09/10 1.122 419,193,091 2,420*

*Estimated

Fund Balance - Prior Audits00/01 801,633 - 7,26601/02 1,297,865 496,23202/03 1,095,037 -202,828*03/04 1,272,684 177,64704/05 1,941,140 668,45605/06 2,414,407 473,266 06/07 3,370,051 995,64407/08 3,489,519 119,46808/09 3,546,901 57,382*Maintenance Tax Note ExpendituresOptimum Fund Balance – 4,632,747

% of Budget per Category

62%7%

10%

9%12%

InstructionSch LeaderPupil ServGen AdminMaint/Other

% of Budget per Category

56%

9%

1%

3%

6%12%7%6%

InstructionGen AdminTransportationFood ServiceExtra CurriculMaint/DataSch LeadershipPupil Serv

Funding Sources

• Local Sources: Taxes 78.08%

• State & Fed Sources 21.92%

• Grants

• Gifts

Funding Sources

% of Tax Value by Category

51.8

15.6

8.6

15

8.3 0.7

Oil/GasLandResidentialBus/CommUtilitiesOther

Sunray Independent School District

Documents

Transcript of Sunray Independent School District