Brand Management - Importance, Difference, Logic, Model , Reasons, Challenges
Summer 2009 The Importance of a Brand - International Housewares
Transcript of Summer 2009 The Importance of a Brand - International Housewares
continued on page 7
Branding, one of the bench-marks of marketing, helps in gen-erating awareness and recognition,with the goal of building loyaltyamong your customer base. In thesmall appliance categories, con-sumers rank brand as the thirdmost important reason for makinga purchase – showing the weight abrand name can hold and the valuebrand marketing can add. In thenon-electric housewares categories,where brand is not as crucial topurchase decisions, 45 percent ofall housewares dollar sales betweenAugust 2008 and April 2009 camefrom brands that the consumerssurveyed could not recall (“notspecified”). That amounts to $2.9billion in sales occurring withoutany brand recognition in a span ofnine months.
Top Reasons for BrandPurchases
What role does brand play inthe housewares market? How doesthis multi-billion dollar industrysustain itself with almost half of itssales coming from brands that areessentially question marks in consumers’minds? Other basics still rule in housewares:functionality, design and cost are the mostimportant elements for these categories.Consumers have told NPD their top reasonsfor purchasing a housewares product areprice, good value, appearance, onsale/promotion and easy to clean. Theseproducts are truly focused on meeting con-sumers’ needs and appealing to them visually.
It really isn’t a surprise that when itcomes to cooking or preparation productssuch as pans, bakeware or knives, cost andfunctionality are key consideration drivers.Among tabletop items such as glasses,dinnerware and flatware, appearance plays alarger role, along with cost. These samethings are important for purchases of “notspecified” or unknown brands, showing
About Housewares MarketWatchHousewares MarketWatch reports
both point-of-sale (POS) and consumerdata from NPD databases. The quarterlydata covers various product categorieswithin the divisions of Small Appliancesand Non-electric Housewares.
The information contained on the following pages is offered as a snapshotof a category’s performance, both fromthe retailer (POS) and consumer perspectives. The POS data covers theretail channels of mass/national chains,department store, specialty store and drugstore (personal care and homeenvironment only). Each issue ofHousewares MarketWatch will featureseveral categories from the SmallAppliances and Housewares divisions.
Complete data on a category can bepurchased by visiting NPD’s website atwww.npd.com.See the Data andMethodology section on page 8 for anexplanation of how the data is compiled.
The housewares market is home to manywell-known brands; and more than a fewquickly come to mind when thinking of
categories from cookware and bakeware to cutleryand tabletop. However, brand is rarely the firstthing that comes to mind when making a house-wares purchase. In fact, The NPD Group’s newConsumer Tracking Service for the housewaresmarket ranks brand ninth among consumers’ topreasons for purchase.
Consumers have told NPD their topreasons for purchasing ahousewares product are price,good value, appearance, onsale/promotion and easy to clean.
The Importance of a BrandBy Peter Goldman, The NPD Group, Inc.
Summer 2009
NewEngland
ELECTRIC CANOPENERS
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
ESPRESSO/CAPPUCCINO MAKERS
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS • AGE OF BUYERPercentage purchased by age of buyer versus census
0
5
10
15
20
25
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
ESPRESSO/CAPPUCCINO MAKERS • REGIONPercentage purchased in region versus census
0
5
10
15
20
25
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
2.4
%
9.0
%
16.6
%
4.9
%
1.5
%
14.1
% 16
.6 %
4.7
%
6.8
%
22.5
%
18.6
%
20.4
%
13.9
% 16
.8 %
11.7
%
4.9
%
20.5
%
18.9
%
20.3
%
11.7
%17.2
%
17.6
%
14.7
%
15.9
%
2Source: The NPD Group
Small Appliances: KITCHEN ELECTRICS
MARKET SIZEQUARTER ONE • 2009UNIT VOLUME IN THOUSANDS
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
TOTA
LMARKE
T
COOKI
NGEL
ECTR
ICS FOOD P
REP/
BEVER
AGE
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
21,665
9,063
12,602
19% of toastersales came fromlong-slot models inQ1’09, up fromonly 8% in Q1’08.
TOASTERS
In the first quarter of2009, blenders with plasticcontainers brought in only25% of dollar sales forthe category, down from30% last year.
BLENDERS
In Q1’09, stand mixersrepresented 75% ofdollar sales of allmixers, down from78% in Q1’08.
STAND MIXERS
13 – 17 years
18 – 24 years
25 – 34 years
35 – 44 years
45 – 54 years
55 – 64 years
65 years +
MiddleAtlantic
East NorthCentral
West NorthCentral
SouthAtlantic
East SouthCentral
West SouthCentral
Mountain Pacific
3.1
%
6.0
%
12.5
%
11.3
%
8.2
%
6.6
%
14.5
%
15.7
%
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSISUnit Volume Share
6 months ending — March 2009
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Source: Retail Tracking Service
3 Source: The NPD Group
Small Appliances: PERSONAL CARE
MARKET SIZEQUARTER 0NE • 2009UNIT VOLUME IN THOUSANDS
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
TOTA
LMARKE
T
HAIR C
ARE/
GROOMING
ORAL CARE &
OTHER
PER
SONAL
CARE
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
42,616
19,90422,712
Pulsating showerheadsaccounted for half of thecategory dollars in the threemonths ending March 2009.
SHOWERHEADS
Manicure/Pedicure beautyservice items gained 7share points, nowaccounting for 17% ofpersonal wellness categorydollars in Q1’09.
PERSONAL WELLNESS
Rechargeable oral careappliances gained someshare in Q1’09, now 16% ofunit sales, up from almost15% the same time last year.
ORAL CAREAPPLIANCES
IRONS
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
HAIRDRYERS • REGIONPercentage purchased in region versus census
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSISUnit Volume Share
6 months ending — March 2009
0
5
10
15
20
25
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
IRONS • BUYER GENDERPercentage purchased by buyer gender versus census
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
4.9
%
4.0
%
38.6
%
11.3
%
6.2
%
6.6
%
14.2
%
15.7
%
61.4
%
48.9
%
51.1
%
21.0
%
18.6
%
14.5
%
15.9
%
6.6
%
6.8
%
14.1
%
14.2
%
7.3
%
6.0
%
11.8
%
HAIRDRYERS
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
NewEngland
MiddleAtlantic
East NorthCentral
West NorthCentral
SouthAtlantic
East SouthCentral
West SouthCentral
Mountain Pacific
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Male Female
WATER FILTRATION DEVICES
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
WATER FILTRATION DEVICES • REGIONPercentage purchased in region versus census
0
5
10
15
20
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
WATER FILTRATION DEVICES • BUYER GENDERPercentage purchased by buyer gender versus census
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
5.9
%
4.9
% 6.0
%
11.9
%
11.3
%
51.1
%
53.8
%
48.9
%
46.2
%
19.2
%
6.8
%
18.6
%
5.8
%
15.9
%
14.8
%
14.1
%
10.3
%
8.9
%
WATER FILTRATION DEVICES
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
Source: The NPD Group
MARKET SIZEQUARTER ONE • 2009UNIT VOLUME IN THOUSANDS
4
Small Appliances: HOME ENVIRONMENT(EXCLUDING VACS)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
TOTA
LMARKE
T
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
16,730
Single packs ofreplacement filters lostshare to multi-packoptions, though they stillrepresent 57% of unitsales in Q1’09.
WATER FILTRATIONREPLACEMENT
FILTERS
NewEngland
MiddleAtlantic
East NorthCentral
West NorthCentral
SouthAtlantic
East SouthCentral
West SouthCentral
Mountain Pacific
10.0
%
6.6
%
13.1
% 15
.7 %
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSISUnit Volume Share
6 months ending — March 2009
Male Female
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Source: The NPD Group5
Small Appliances: FLOOR CARE
MARKET SIZEQUARTER ONE • 2009UNIT VOLUME IN THOUSANDS
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
TOTA
LMARKE
T
8,053
Fixed stick modelsnow account for thelargest share of thecategory, at 49% ofunits in Q1’09, with2-in-1 conversionmodels at 36%.
STICK VACUUMS
Single Member
Two Members
Three Members
Four Members
Five or More Members
UPRIGHT VACUUMS
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
UPRIGHT VACUUMS • AGE OF BUYERPercentage purchased by age of buyer versus census
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSISUnit Volume Share
6 months ending — March 2009
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
UPRIGHT VACUUMS • HOUSEHOLD SIZEPercentage purchased by household size versus census
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
10.3
%
13.6
% 16.4
%
21.4
%
32.5
%
26.3
%
18.2
%
19.3
%
19.3
% 22.6
%
UPRIGHT VACUUMS
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
13 – 17 years
18 – 24 years
25 – 34 years
35 – 44 years
45 – 54 years
55 – 64 years
65 years +
0.7
%
9.0
%
7.7
%
11.7
%
22.0
%
16.8
% 19.3
%
18.9
%
25.9
%
17.2
%
15.9
%
11.7
%
8.5
%
14.7
%
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Open stock flatwaresales increased by 26%in Q1’09, compared todollar sales the sametime last year.
FLATWARE
Dollar sales of pressurecookers grew by 22%in Q1’09, compared toQ1’08
COOKWARE
Source: The NPD Group
Housewares: NON-ELECTRIC
MARKET SIZEQUARTER ONE • 2009UNIT VOLUME IN THOUSANDS
6
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Source: Retail Tracking Service
8,86
2
4,77
4
1,75
0
1,54
0
DINNERWARE
BEVERAGEWARE
COOKWARE
BAKEWARE
FLATWARE
CUTLERY
3,58
1
3,22
0
In the six months endingMarch 2009, the #1 reasonfor purchase of a bakewareproduct is price, followed bygood value and easy to clean.
OVEN OR MICROWAVEBAKEWARE
BEVERAGEWARE
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
DINNERWARE • HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD AGEPercentage purchased by age of head of household versus census
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSISUnit Volume Share
6 months ending — March 2009
0
5
10
15
20
25
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
BEVERAGEWARE • HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD GENDERPercentage purchased by gender of head of household versus census
0
20
40
60
80
00
17.9
%
51.1
%
48.9
%
82.1
%
DINNERWARE
CENSUS (PERCENT OF POPULATION)
18 – 24 years
25 – 34 years
35 – 44 years
45 – 54 years
55 – 64 years
65 years +
6.4
%
11.7
%
17.5
%
16.8
% 22.7
%
18.9
%
21.7
%
17.2
% 18.6
%
11.7
% 13.1
% 14.7
%
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
Male Female
Source: Consumer Tracking Service
Source: Retail Tracking Service
Source: Retail Tracking Service
surprising similarities in reasons for purchasecompared to the industry as a whole.
Could there be an opportunity to buildon consumers’ practical and emotionalresponses by affiliating those key character-istics with a brand? When asked if the state-ment “willing to spend more on brands”described them, 59 percent of consumerssaid it did. On average, consumers spent $4more on housewares purchases where theyknew the brand than they did on theunknown brand purchases. Those brandedpurchases represent more than half of thedollar sales in the market – $3.6 billion overnine months.
Brand Effect is MixedWhether for a set of pots and pans or a
fine china placesetting, brand didn’t makeit to the top five reasons for any of thehousewares categories NPD tracks.However, many brands that were recog-
nized and ranked tops in terms of salesalso, logically saw brand as one of the topfive reasons for purchase. This is particu-larly evident in the cookware, bakeware,dinnerware and cutlery categories. It isimportant to note that approximately 40percent of consumers surveyed said theywould definitely purchase the same brandagain in these categories; when looking atthe top brands, that number increases to65 percent.
While the data are clearly mixed, pur-chases influenced by brand have a fewthings going in their favor — the likelihoodof repeat purchases, consumers’ willingnessto spend more and, with nine months ofdata collected, greater than 50 percent ofsales. In addition, we’ve already seen a num-ber of brand and line extensions comeabout as a result of “casualization” and achanging economic climate. These exten-sions bring new competition from more for-
mal brands, established brands and thosesuccessful in other categories and industries.
Traditional thinking tells us brand loyaltyleads to repeat purchases, but the house-wares industry may be different, respondingto a different set of stimuli. The importanceof brand in this marketplace is still in ques-tion, split almost down the middle based onsales figures for the August 2008 to April2009 period. With this unique balance andthe changes occurring around us, thehousewares industry should pay close atten-tion to its consumers and their preferences,in an effort to better understand the impor-tance of brand as an influence on the con-sumer’s decision-making process.
Peter Goldman is president of the Home Section at The NPD Group. These are the opinions of Goldman and NPD. For more information, contact Goldman at 516-625-6136.
7 Source: The NPD Group
The Importance of a BrandContinued from page 1
8Source: The NPD Group
ABOUT THE NPD GROUP, INC.
The NPD Group, Inc. (NPD) is a glob-al market information company thatmeasures product movement and con-sumer behavior across a broad rangeof industries -- apparel, automotiveproducts, consumer electronics, cosmet-ics and fragrances, food, foodservice,footwear, housewares, information tech-nology, interactive entertainment, toysand music. NPD's clients, many in theFortune 500, use this insight to uncovermarket opportunities, strengthen chan-nel relationships and benchmark indus-try performance. Since 1967, NPD hasintroduced numerous industry firsts,most recently combining and calibratinginformation from consumer panels andpoint-of-sale tracking via its flagshipservices, the NPD Worlds. The firm hasoffices and affiliations in 60 countries.For more information on The NPDGroup, visit www.npd.com.
DATA AND METHODOLOGYNPD has a standard data model that is used
for all categories that incorporates both con-sumer and point-of-sale (POS) databases.These two data sources are highly comple-mentary and are used to support one another.
Point-of-Sale (POS) databases are assem-bled from retailers' records of actual sales byproduct as collected at the cash register.These databases are highly reliable and pro-vide census counts of sales by product andprice for participating retailers. The complet-ed sales data are valuable to clients trying tounderstand which products or items are sell-ing well and which are not, at which pricesand in which channels. The finished POSdata describe the product, retail channel andprice. They do not, however, address thebuyer of the product.
Consumer databases are developed usingproduct purchase surveys completed by alarge-scale rotating sample of consumers.
These data also produce estimates of sales byproduct and retail channel. More importantly,the consumer surveys capture informationabout each purchase, such as buyer demo-graphics, the product's intended use and avariety of other characteristics. These factshelp clients understand why products are sell-ing and consumers' motivations.
CONSUMER METHODOLOGYMost consumer data in the U.S. are gath-
ered from periodic samples of individuals whoare asked about their recent purchases.Respondents report certain details about thetype and nature of their purchases in a surveyadministered via the Web. The respondingsample is demographically weighted and pro-jected through a series of steps to representthe Total Adult (18+) and, for appliances,Total Teen (13-17) U.S. population.
Each week, over 35,000 individuals areselected from the NPD online consumer panel
to participate in the appliancestudy. Each month, over 30,000U.S. households are selected forthe housewares study.
The NPD online consumerpanel is composed of pre-recruited individuals who haveagreed to participate in NPDonline surveys and have com-pleted a comprehensive demo-graphic questionnaire. The useof an established online panelassures good cooperation levelsand predictable demographicbalance among cooperators.
POS METHODOLOGYNPD collects point-of-sale
retailer data from selected retail-ers. These data are the actualsales for the chain on an SKU-by-SKU basis. The data arecombined with data from otherretailers to produce reports oncertain categories by channel,where a sufficient number ofretailers are cooperating andwhere sufficient market demandexists for the database.
Deborah A. Teschke, Senior EditorPeter Goldman, Contributing EditorJanine Marshall-Bolton, Contributing EditorTom Goodman, DesignPublished by IHA
For more information, contact Debbie Teschke at 847-692-0110; [email protected]
6400 SHAFER COURT, STE. 650ROSEMONT, IL 60018 USATEL: 847-292-4200 FAX: 847-292-4211www.housewares.org