SUMMARY PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT

Property Condition Assessment, Inc.

Due Diligence & Capital Planning

P. O. Box 568363 ● Orlando, FL 32856-8363 ● Tel: 407.422.5257 ● Fax: 407.419.4194 E-Mail: [email protected]

SUMMARY PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT

UCF Parsonage 8749 Aspen Avenue Orlando, FL 32817

June 18, 2013

Project No: PCA13-025

Property Condition Assessment, Inc.

Due Diligence & Capital Planning

P. O. Box 568363 ● Orlando, FL 32856-8363 ● Tel: 407.422.5257 ● Fax: 407.419.4194 E-Mail: [email protected]

June 18, 2013

Wesley Foundation United Methodist Building 450 Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue Lakeland, FL 33815

Attn: Reverend David Fuquay [email protected]; (404) 849-8215

Re: Property Condition Assessment UCF Parsonage

8749 Aspen Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 Parcel ID: 01-22-30-9438-00-0880 Project No: PCA13-025

To Whom It May Concern:

Property Condition Assessment, Inc. (PCAInc) has completed a Property Condition Assessment (PCA) of the referenced property in general accordance with the ASTM Baseline Property Condition Assessment Process, E 2018-08, and PCAInc’s Proposal 12-048, July 12, 2012.

This Property Condition Report (PCR) is for the exclusive use and benefit of The Board of Trustees of the Florida Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. and the Board of Higher Education and Campus Ministry of The Florida Annual Conference of The United Methodist Church, the “Client.” It is not to be relied on by any other agency or entity without the written consent of the Client and PCAInc.

The opinions expressed in this report by PCAInc were formed utilizing the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by any prudent property condition evaluator in the same community under similar circumstances. PCAInc assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy of information contained in this report that has been obtained from the Client or the Client’s representatives, the owner or the owner’s representatives, from other interested parties, or from the public domain. The conclusions presented represent PCAInc’s professional judgment based on the information obtained during the course of this assignment. PCAInc’s evaluations, analyses, and opinions are not representations regarding the design integrity, structural soundness, or real value of the

mailto:[email protected]

Property Condition Assessment – 13925 58th Street North, Clearwater, FL 33760

property. Information regarding operations, conditions, and test data provided by the Client, the current owner, or their representatives has been assumed to be correct and complete. The conclusions presented are based on the data provided, observations made, and conditions that existed specifically on the date of the assessment walk through on June 11, 2013. PCAInc certifies that PCAInc has no undisclosed interest in the referenced property. PCAInc’s relationship with the Client is at arm’s length, and PCAInc’s employment and compensation are not contingent upon the findings or estimated costs to remedy any deficiencies due to deferred maintenance and any noted component or system replacements.

PCAInc’s PCR cannot wholly eliminate the uncertainty regarding the presence of physical deficiencies and the performance of a subject property’s building systems. Preparation of a PCR in accordance with ASTM E 2018-08 is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, the uncertainty regarding the potential for component or system failure and to reduce the potential that such component or system may not be initially observed. A PCR is not intended to be technically exhaustive and is not a code compliance report. In accordance with ASTM E 2018-08, representative observations were made and not complete inventories. This PCR was prepared recognizing the inherent subjective nature of PCAInc’s opinions as to such issues as workmanship, quality of original installation, and estimated remaining useful life (RUL) of any given component or system. It should be understood that PCAInc’s suggested remedy may be determined under time constraints, formed without the aid of engineering calculations, testing, exploratory probing, the removal of materials, or design. Furthermore, there may be other or more appropriate schemes or methods to remedy the physical deficiency. PCAInc’s opinions are generally formed without detailed knowledge from individuals familiar with the component’s or system’s performance.

Participants in the walk-through were Robert McBride (field observer and PCR author), Barbara Betz (field observer and PCR reviewer) and Josh Kilmer, Commercial Roofing Consultants, Inc. Access to the property was provided by Reverend Erwin Lopez.

Any questions regarding this report should be directed to PCAInc at (407) 422-5257.

Respectfully,

Robert R. McBride Vice President

Reviewed by,

Barbara A. Betz President

Property Condition Assessment – 13925 58th Street North, Clearwater, FL 33760

Property Condition Assessment – 8749 Aspen Avenue, Orlando, FL 32817

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Summary ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope ...................................................................... 1 1.2 Deviations from the Guide ............................................................ 1 1.3 Major Concerns ............................................................................ 1 1.4 General Description and Physical Condition ................................. 3 1.5 Other Observations ....................................................................... 3

1.5.1 Site and Drainage .............................................................. 3 1.5.2 Landscape and Irrigation .................................................... 5 1.5.3 Access, Paving, Curbing and Parking ................................ 6 1.5.4 Utilities ............................................................................... 7 1.5.5 Structure ............................................................................ 8 1.5.6 Thermal and Moisture Protection ....................................... 9 1.5.7 Mechanical Systems and Equipment ............................... 12 1.5.8 Electrical Systems and Equipment ................................... 16 1.5.9 Interior Space, Life Safety and Fire Protection ................. 18 1.5.10 Vertical Transportation ..................................................... 22

2. Opinions of Probable Cost ..................................................................... 23 2.1 Definitions ................................................................................... 23 2.2 Table of Action Items and Opinions of Probable Cost ................ 24

Exhibits: A. Qualifications B. Orange County Building Permits C. Order of Magnitude Estimating D. ASHRAE TC-1.8 Service Life Expectancies


Project No: PCA13-025 1

1. SUMMARY:

1.1 Purpose and Scope:

The purpose of the PCA is to observe and report, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes of ASTM E 2018-08, on the physical condition of the subject property. The scope of the PCA has four components:

Document reviews and interviews with Authorities Having Jurisdiction Walk through survey Preparation of the opinions of probable cost to remedy physical deficiencies Preparation of a Property Condition Report

1.2 Deviations from the Guide:

This PCA was conducted as a Summary. The report is limited in descriptions and equipment inventories and is primarily directed to areas to be included in a capital reserve budget.

No construction plans, surveys, etc. were made available to PCAInc for review. Interviews with the Authorities Having Jurisdiction were not made.

1.3 Major Concerns:

The wood fencing is leaning in two areas, northeast section and southwest section. The leaning fence is generating complaints from the neighbors. Although the cost to repair the fence is minimal, the repair is considered to be a major concern because it is creating a neighborhood conflict.

There are immediate repairs needed to the roof that need to be made to preclude water intrusion issues. Estimated immediate repair costs are between $1,200 and $1,400. The roof was installed in 2004 and funds should be budgeted to replace the roof in five years.

The electrical service panel and electrical distribution panels were manufactured by Federal Pacific. The occupants report that they have received minor shocks from light switches and have noticed arcing in light switches. A certified licensed electrician needs to be contracted to inspect the electrical system in the house and make necessary repairs. The replacement of the distribution panel and inspection is estimated to cost $2,500.

The HVAC air handler has been in service for approximately 18 years, three years beyond its anticipated useful life. The HVAC condenser is newer, having been replaced in 2005. Funds should be budgeted to replace the air handler and condenser within the



next two years. Both units will need replacement due to the new refrigerant requirements. Estimated replacement cost is approximately $7,000.

Opinions of probable cost are based on order of magnitude estimating. The goal is to provide a cost estimate within 70-80% of the actual cost. These estimates and allowances are to be used for budgeting only. To determine the more probable actual cost, the Client is referenced to professional architects/engineers for the preparation of documentation to be used in bidding by qualified contractors.

Category 1, Life Safety Issues $ 2,500 Category 2, Deferred Maintenance $19,350 Category 3, Options $ 4,400

Total $26,250



1.4 General Descriptions and Physical Condition:

The property is located in Woodside Village subdivision, a residential community located north of University Boulevard, west of Highway 417 and North Econlockhatchee Trail in unincorporated Orange County, Florida.

The Orange County Property Appraiser (OCPA) lists the total land area as being approximately 0.24 acres. The property is rectangular in shape with the long axis running north-south. The property is 86’ wide by 120’ deep. The building is sited towards the front of the property.

The property was sold to The Board of Trustees of the Florida Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. on December 9, 1981. The 2013 market value of the property is $137,447, $50,000 for the property and $87,447 for the building.

The building is a 2,871 gross sq. ft. single-story residence with 1,970 sq. ft. of living space. It has a two-car garage, 552 sq. ft. with a 319 sq. ft. screened porch at the rear. There are three bedrooms, two full baths and a room being used as an office. It was constructed in 1978.

The building is of concrete masonry unit construction (CMU) with pre-engineered wood trusses and an asphaltic three-tab shingle roof with a modified bitumen membrane on the low slope porch roof.

The front of the building is finished with a stone veneer and Hardie siding. Hardie siding is used on the wood framed porch. The majority of the building has a stucco finish.

1.5 Other Observations:

1.5.1 Site and Drainage:

There were no issues with the storm water drainage.

A 210 linear foot six-foot board-on-board wood fence encloses the back yard. The fence is leaning into the neighbor’s property to the left and there is a section of the fence leaning into the neighbor’s property at the rear. The fence was installed in 2005 by Fence Outlet, 9671 S. Orange Blossom Trail, Orlando. It appears that the fence posts were not anchored with concrete as they should have been. These fence sections should be disassembled, the posts reset in concrete and the panels re-attached. The work can be properly performed with handyman labor. The estimated repair cost has been included in the Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) table at the end of this report.



Fence on west side is leaning

Fence at rear is leaning



1.5.2 Landscape and Irrigation:

The landscaping is in fair to good condition. It is evident that a lot of work has been recently performed in rejuvenating the landscaping, removing old and overgrown plants and replacing them with new plants. The new landscaping in the front of the house gives the 35-year-old home a younger appearance. The landscaping in the rear of the house needs further work.

The Saint Augustine sod lawn is in fair condition. The front lawn evidences a past chinch bug problem, but with care will fill in. The rear lawn has extensive weeds. Should the current lawn service company not be able to correct the weed problem, another service company should be engaged.

Front lawn

The irrigation system has a Rain Bird ESP Modular irrigation controller mounted on an interior garage wall. It is a commercial unit with more capability than needed for a residential property. The controller has 13 irrigation zones with four zones currently programmed for use. The irrigation system was not observed in operation. A remote rain sensor was not observed; however, the controller was set to bypass the sensor. Building code requires the use of a rain sensor.



The irrigation heads around the building do not meet the current code requirements. They are installed less than 12” from the building wall; however, no issues with the building were observed.

Irrigation controller

1.5.3 Access, Paving, Curbing, and Parking:

There is a two-car concrete driveway. The concrete is in good condition for its age. It is cracked. The entrance drive is steep, causing vehicles to scrape the pavement. Consideration should be given to repairing the cracks in the concrete to extend its life and an estimate has been included in the OPC table.



Driveway

The concrete sidewalk in front of the building is in good condition. There is a concrete pad in the rear of the building used as a barbecue grill pad. It is in good condition.

1.5.4 Utilities:

The primary electric power is provided by Duke Energy and is brought to the property underground from a ground mounted transformer located in the northwest corner of the parcel.

The water service meter is located in the sidewalk at the southwest corner of the parcel. There is a 1” backflow preventer in the liriope planting bed near the water meter. The shutoff water valve to the building was not located; however, the backflow preventer can be used to shut off the water, if necessary.



Water service backflow preventer

The sanitary service appears to be a septic system located in the front of the building. A PVC sanitary cleanout was observed at the front of the building.

Natural gas service was not observed.

Reclaimed water service was not observed.

1.5.5 Structure:

Construction plans were not provided for review.

The building is a concrete masonry (CMU) structure with a concrete slab-on-grade and a pre-engineered roof truss system. The roof deck is constructed of pine boards.

No structural issues with the CMU walls were observed. No typical stair-step cracking was observed in the walls. The slab in the living spaces was covered with flooring and was not observable. The slab in the garage was in good condition.

The rear porch was wood framed. No structural issues were observed.



1.5.6 Thermal and Moisture Protection:

Moisture protection for the building consists of an asphalt shingle roof system with a torch-down modified bitumen roof over the low-slope porch roof.

The CMU masonry walls are finished with Hardie cement board siding and stucco. The walls appear to be painted with a quality latex paint. Re-sealing the stucco walls and repainting with latex paint is recommended every seven years.

The windows and exterior doors were replaced in 2011 by Strong General Contractors, Oviedo. The garage door was replaced in 2011 by Above the Rest Garage Doors, Inc., Kissimmee.

Thermal protection is provided with blown insulation material in the attic. The insulation value appears to be minimal. It is recommended that Duke Energy be contacted to evaluate the insulation of the attic. It is highly likely that additional insulation will be recommended.

Attic insulation

No roof leaks were observed. No water intrusion issues with the windows were observed.



There were installation and maintenance issues observed with the roof. The ridge vent was installed with improper fasteners (standard nails). The fasteners need to be re-sealed to preclude leaks. The bathroom vent and sanitary stack above the small bathroom need to be re-flashed. Squirrels are chewing the lead boots on the three sanitary vent stacks. The lead boots need to be repaired to preclude leaks. The rear gutter on the building is filled with plant debris. The gutters need to be cleaned regularly, usually twice a year. Clogged gutters will cause the wood fascia boards to rot. The cost for the repairs has been included in the OPC table.

The finish roof was installed in 2004, prior to the 2004 hurricanes. The roof will reach its anticipated useful life in five years. The estimated cost to re-roof in similar materials has been included in the OPC table.

The screens on the rear porch are loose and need to be repaired or replaced. This is considered minor maintenance. The estimated cost for the repairs has been included in the OPC table.

Loose screens on porch

A section of the ventilated soffit at the rear of the house is loose and needs to be repaired to keep squirrels from entering the attic.



Front west end of house (master bath and closet are on other side of wall)

East side of house (garage and bedroom wing)



Rear of house

1.5.7 Mechanical Systems and Equipment:

The original copper water lines in the home were replaced with PVC lines in 1999 by Herrell Plumbing, Orlando. The water lines were run overhead in the attic space. The plumbing permit was shown to be expired, meaning the work did not have a final inspection by the building department to determine if it was properly performed.



Attic showing PVC water lines

The observed sanitary piping above grade is PVC. The PVC used for the sanitary systems is anticipated to have long-term useful life remaining with no anticipated system replacement or significant repair costs occurring within the five year outlook of this PCR.

There are two bathrooms. Both bathrooms were likely renovated in 2011. The bathtub appears to be original.

Cooling and heating are provided by one split-system HVAC heat pump. The condenser is located on the east side of the building. It is a 3.5 ton Goodman manufactured in 2005 (model CPLJ42-1B; serial number 0503141369). The air handler is a 3.5 ton Trane manufactured in 1995 (model TWE042C14FB1; serial number K21826700).



HVAC condenser

HVAC air handler unit



The HVAC air handler has been in service for approximately 18 years, three years beyond its anticipated useful life. The HVAC condenser is newer, having been replaced in 2005. Funds should be budgeted to replace the air handler and condenser within the next two years. Both units will need replacement due to the new refrigerant requirements. The cost for replacement of the HVAC equipment has been included in the OPC table.

Duct work consists of ridged duct board. It appears to be in good condition.

HVAC ducts

The electric water heater is located in the garage. It is a General Electric 40-gallon unit installed in 2001. It is in good condition and should last another three years.



Water heater

1.5.8 Electrical Systems and Equipment:

The electric service is mounted on the west side of the building. The service disconnect box is manufactured by Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) and has a 150-amp breaker.



Electric service and Brighthouse CATV box

The electric service wires are aluminum (standard construction). The building is wired with copper.

The 200-amp electrical distribution panel is mounted on the west interior wall of the garage. It is manufactured by FPE. FPE panels have a reputation of causing fires. Although they have not been subjected to national recall, New Jersey has filed a class action suit against FPE.



Electric distribution panel

The occupants report that they have received minor shocks from light switches and have noticed arcing in light switches. A certified licensed electrician needs to be contracted to inspect the electrical system in the house and make necessary repairs. The cost for replacement of the distribution panel and inspection of the electrical system has been included in the OPC table.

Cable television service is provided by Bright House.

1.5.9 Interior Space, Life Safety and Fire Protection:

The interior finishes are in very good condition. Wood flooring has been installed throughout the home. The bathrooms and kitchen have been remodeled, likely in 2011. They are current is design style and equipment.

The plaster ceilings are in good condition.

The interior walls appear to have been painted within the last year, likely when the current occupant moved in last July.

A hand-held fire extinguisher was observed in the garage. It was charged and appears to be in operable condition. It is recommended that the fire extinguisher by kept in the kitchen.



Two minor dents in the wood flooring in the foyer/living room area were brought to our attention. There is an unopened box of wood flooring material in the Attic. It is a snap-together flooring material manufactured by Armstrong.

There is a fire hydrant in front of the adjacent house in the utility easement.

Living room



Dining room with bay window

Kitchen



Master bedroom

Master bath



1.5.10 Vertical Transportation:

Not applicable.



2. OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST:

2.3 Definitions:

Opinions of probable cost are provided for resolution of material physical deficiencies observed. Under the ASTM guidelines, these exclude cosmetic/decorative matters; enhancements for marketplace repositioning; and routine and normal preventive maintenance.

PCAInc provides a table of recommended actions for remedy of physical deficiencies and for certain other matters that may not fall within the ASTM guidelines. PCAInc classifies actions in three categories:

- Category 1: Code violations and/or life safety matters that require immediate action

- Category 2: Deferred maintenance actions required to resolve material deficiencies in building systems and components

- Category 3: Enhancements

Under ASTM guidelines, a lower limit of $3,000 is set as a threshold to define actions that are not minor or insignificant. ASTM excludes code and life safety items from this threshold. PCAInc chooses to list action items that are below the threshold value to assure that the Client has a ready reference to all actions recommended by the findings and observations. Some of these items are noted as “Maint.” in the cost column.

Opinions of probable cost are based on the order of magnitude. These are to be used for budgeting only. To determine the more probable actual cost, the Client is referenced to professional architects/engineers for the preparation of documentation to be used in bidding by qualified contractors.



2.5 Table of Action Items and Opinions of Probable Cost

Section Year Description Cat. Est. Cost 1.5.1 2013 Estimate to repair leaning wood fence 2 4501.5.3 2013 Allowance to repair driveway cracks 3 5001.5.6 2013 Add insulation to attic 3 3,9001.5.6 2013 Estimate for immediate roof repairs 2 1,400

1.5.6 2018 Estimate to re-roof; 35.33 squares 3-tab shingles @ $300/sq. and 6.5 squares torch down modified@ $400/sq.

2 10,000

1.5.6 2013 Allowance to repair loose screens on porch 2 5001.5.7 2016 Estimate to replace 3.5 tons HVAC equipment 2 7,000

1.5.8 2013 Estimate to replace electrical distribution panel and inspect electrical system 1 2,500

Total, Category 1, Life Safety and Code 1 2,500 Total, Category 2, Deferred Maintenance 2 19,350 Total, Category 3, Options 3 4,400

Overall total $26,250

EXHIBIT A

QUALIFICATIONS

ROBERT R. McBRIDE, LEP PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT, INC.

ROBERT R. McBRIDE has been with PCAInc since April 2002. Past company President, he is now part owner and serves as the corporation Vice President. Bob is the director of operations, scheduling and coordinating the field work, performing due diligence property condition assessments, construction progress inspections, and Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments. He is a Licensed Environmental Professional and has been a certified Structural Masonry Inspector and Mold Inspector. Bob is an infrared thermographer, specializing in building infrared thermography for water intrusion.

Bob is a long-time resident of Orlando, his family moving to Orlando in 1954. After attending Maynard Evans High School, he continued his education at Florida Southern College in Lakeland, Florida. He graduated in 1970 with a Bachelor of Science degree in biology with a heavy minor in chemistry and specialized in microbiology. Upon graduation, Bob volunteered for the Air Force, following after his father’s 23-year career.

In the Air Force, Bob’s primary duties were in air defense combat operations where he was a fighter weapons controller, radar operations specialist, and electronic counter-countermeasures officer. Bob’s primary duty assignments were Alaska, Colorado, Washington, Montana and New York, with overseas assignments in the Philippines and Germany. Bob was the Director of Air Defense operations in Saudi Arabia during the Iran-Iraq war in which Iraq launched air attacks against shipping in the Arabian Gulf. While in the Philippines, Bob was involved in the search for the last Japanese straggler from WWII. Bob retired from active duty in August 1970 as a Major having served for 20 years. His awards include four Meritorious Service Medals.

1991-2002 Bob worked for Earth Resources Corporation, Ocoee, Florida, an environmental corporation providing environmental assessments, sampling and remediation, and high hazard waste remediation, such as unknown compressed gases. Bob began his work at Earth Resources Corporation as a contract administrator for private, governmental and defense contracts and prepared bid estimates. Bob’s responsibilities quickly grew and he became the assistant director of operations for compressed gas cylinder remediation, the lead company in that field of work in the US providing services for major corporations, universities and research centers, Department of Defense, and the Department of Energy. Bob was the company’s Program Director for Earth Resources’ work in the development of technology and equipment design for the destruction of chemical warfare materials.

In 2002, when Earth Resources Corporation’s owners decided to retire and sell the company, Bob joined Property Condition Assessment where he was rapidly promoted to Vice President. In 2006, Bob was promoted to President. Since joining PCAInc, Bob was instrumental in growing the company from five employees to eleven and greatly increasing the company’s client base and market share.

May 2012, Bob McBride and Barbara Betz, also with PCAInc, formed a partnership and purchased the corporation from its owner and founder, Paul Halyard.

BARBARA A. BETZ PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT, INC.

BARBARA A. BETZ is the corporation President and majority shareholder. She has been with the company since July of 2006 handling Business Development, Strategic Planning and Growth, Advertising and overseeing all payroll and accounting functions. Barbara manages the Residential Construction Department, performing field inspections and scheduling and reviewing the work of other inspectors.

Barbara is qualified and experienced in performing commercial construction progress inspections as well as providing construction loan administration services. Prior to serving as President, Barbara was Director of Marketing. During her time as Director of Marketing, Barbara increased the client base by 131%.

Before coming to PCAInc, Barbara worked in the residential construction industry in sales with Homes by Carmen, a high end residential builder, where she was honored and published in the June 2006 Orlando Magazine as one of The Hot 100 Real Estate’s Best.

Barbara started a successful, small service company in 2005. Within a three year period, she increased business and grew the company to five employees.

Barbara came to Orlando from Virginia in 1981 having been recruited by Martin Marietta Corporation. Her job assignment was Marketing Specialist, researching Senate Armed Services Committee reports.

Barbara has served in many volunteer capacities for civic and community organizations. She served as Chairman of the College and Career Center Volunteers at Lake Highland Preparatory School, Chairman of the Bargain Box for the Junior League of Greater Orlando, Chairman of the Ladies Board at The Country Club of Orlando, and served on the Orlando Opera Guild, PESO (Participation Enriches Science, Music and Art Organizations).

In May 2012, Barbara formed a partnership with Bob McBride, also of Property Condition Assessment, Inc. and purchased a majority of the corporation from former owner and founder Paul J. Halyard.

Barbara is a graduate from Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia, achieving a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing and has earned credits towards her MBA. She has a Florida real estate license and serves as the Inn Administrator for the George C. Young First Central Florida Inn of Court.

EXHIBIT B

ORANGE COUNTY BUILDING PERMITS

EXHIBIT C

ORDER OF MAGNITUDE ESTIMATING

EXHIBIT D

ASHRAE TC-1.8 ESTIMATES OF SERVICE LIVES OF VARIOUS SYSTEM

COMPONENTS

Table 3 Estimates of Service Lives of Various System Components Median Median Median Equipment Item Years Equipment Item Years Equipment Item Years Air conditioners Window unit ..................................... 10 Residential single or split package ... 15 Commercial through-the-wall ........... 15 Water-cooled package ..................... 15

Heat pumps Residential air-to-air ......................... 15a

Commercial air-to-air ....................... 15 Commercial water-to-air ................... 19

Roof-top air conditioners Single Zone ..................................... 15 Multi zone ........................................ 15

Boilers, hot water (steam) Steel water-tube.......................... 24 (30) Steel fire-tube ............................. 25 (25) Cast iron ..................................... 35 (30) Electric ............................................. 15

Burners .................................................. 21

Furnaces Gas or electric ................................. 18

Unit heaters Gas or electric ................................. 13 Hot water or steam .......................... 20

Radiant heaters Electric ............................................. 10 Hot water or steam .......................... 25

Air terminals Diffusers, grilles and registers .......... 27 Induction and fan-coil units............... 20 VAV and double-duct boxes ............. 20

Air washers ............................................ 17

Ductwork................................................ 30

Campers ................................................ 20

Fans Centrifugal ....................................... 25 Axial ................................................. 20 Propeller .......................................... 15 Ventilating roof-mounted .................. 20

Coils DX, water or steam .......................... 20 Electric ............................................. 15

Heat Exchangers Shell-and-tube.................................. 24

Reciprocating compressors.................... 20

Package chillers Reciprocating ................................... 20 Centrifugal ....................................... 23 Absorption ........................................ 23

Cooling towers Galvanized metal ............................. 20 Wood ............................................... 20 Ceramic ........................................... 34

Air-cooled condensers ........................... 20

Evaporative condensers ......................... 20

Insulation Molded ............................................. 20 Blanket ............................................. 24

Pumps Base-mounted .................................. 20 Pipe-mounted ................................... 10 Sump and well .................................. 10 Condensate ...................................... 15

Reciprocating engines ............................ 20

Steam turbines ....................................... 30

Electric motors ....................................... 18

Motor starters ......................................... 17

Electric transformers .............................. 30

Controls Pneumatic ........................................ 20 Electric ............................................. 16 Electronic ......................................... 15

Valve actuators Hydraulic .......................................... 15 Pneumatic ........................................ 20 Self-contained .................................. 10

Source: Data obtained from a national survey of the United States by ASHRAE Technical Committee TC 1.8 (Akalin 1978). Data updated by TC 1.8 in 1986. a See Lovvorn and Hiller (1985) and Easton Consultants (1986) for further information.

SUMMARY PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT

Documents

Transcript of SUMMARY PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT