Summary on the Reporting for the 8 th UWWTD Implementation Report Prepared by ETC/ICM Event/ date:...

Summary on the Reporting for the 8th UWWTD Implementation Report

Prepared by ETC/ICM

Event/ date: UWWTD workshop, 26.03.13, BrusselsAuthor: Petra Ronen, Anita Künitzer

2

Structure of the presentation

• 8th UWWTD data request in figures• Data submission statistics• Data QAQC, typical errors• Data products• Lessons learned• Tentative roadmap for the 9th reporting exercise


3

8th UWWTD data request in figures

• Launch on December 2, 2014

• 28 MS and NO, CH

• First submission round (Feb 24, 2014- Sep 15, 2014)

• Final submission round (Apr 17, 2014- Jan 19, 2015)

• Min number of re-submissions: 0

• Max number of re-submissions: 9

• No of Production DB updates : 9

• No of emails exchanged: 735


4

Data submission statisticsCountry

date of data submission to ETC (CDR)

Number of amendments between the first and the final submission (dates)

first final

Poland 15.9.2014 19.1.2015 2(3.12, 5.12)Austria 28.5.2014 13.6.2014 Belgium 20.5.2014 11.6.2014 1 (26.5)Bulgaria 24.4.2014 18.6.2014 1 (14.5)Croatia 16.6.2014 30.7.2014 Cyprus 28.5.2014 2.6.2014

Czech Republic 30.5.2014 23.6.2014 1 (20.6)Denmark 2.6.2014 30.6.2014 Estonia 28.5.2014 5.6.2014 Finland 12.6.2014 1.7.2014 France 28.5.2014 1.8.2014

Germany 3.6.2014 30.6.2014 Greece 30.5.2014 27.6.2014 Hungary 2.6.2014 11.6.2014 Ireland 30.5.2014 10.6.2014

Italy 30.5.2014 19.1.2015

8 (2.6, 5.6, 20.6, 15.10, 31.10, 10.11,

9.12, 14.1)Latvia 3.6.2014 2.7.2014

Lithuania 27.5.2014 16.7.2014 Luxembourg 17.4.2014 17.4.2014

Malta 2.6.2014 8.7.2014 Netherlands 30.5.2014 5.6.2014

Norway 25.2.2014 24.10.2014

Poland 15.9.2014 19.1.2015 2(3.12, 5.12)Portugal 11.6.2014 26.6.2014 Romania 28.4.2014 26.6.2014 Slovakia 30.5.2014 6.6.2014 Slovenia 30.5.2014 12.8.2014 2 (15.7, 4.8)

Spain 30.5.2014 4.8.2014 1 (17.7)Sweden 26.5.2014 26.6.2014

Switzerland 29.8.2014 3.9.2014 United Kingdom 28.5.2014 18.8.2014 1 (1.7)

5

UWWTD QAQC process

• QAQC process for the xml file exported from the web tool


6

Data QAQC, typical errors (1)•

Com plet e link f r o m ag glom er at ion – UW W TP/ Collec t ing s yst e m wit hout t r e at m ent – disc har g e po int – r ece iving ar ea , inclu ding t he co m ple t e inf o on t he was t ewat er p at hways f or t ot al gene r at ed load ( 1 00% ) .

•Hist or iog r aph y- m issing agg los/ p lant s as c om p ar ed t o e ar lier dat a r eq uest s

•M is sing m on it or in g dat a wit hout expla nat io n pr ovide d

•O n ly hig hest t r e at m e nt t ype r epor t ed

•I D s of wat er b odies not cons ist ent wit h W FD wa t er b odies

•M is sing links t o b ig cit ie s, m issin g links SA- CSA

•I nc or r e ct c odes f or NUTS

•Num er o us t opolo gy er r or s in s pat ial dat a set s (namely SA river s, SA lakes, etc.)


7

Data QAQC, typical errors (2)Errors that were not expected (any more) yet appeared …….

•Duplicities

•Incorrect format of Codes of plants and agglomerations, without MS prefix

•Missing records (e.g. RCA date of designation, designation criteria) especially in case this data had been reported under previous data requests

•Discharge points linked to non-existing RCA

•Missing coordinates, missing generated load (completely)

•Percentage values (representing shares of total generated load) higher than 100%


8

Recommendations for the upcoming data request

• On data compilation and quality– The SQL scripts applied during the QAQC proces are available and can be used

prior the data submission (for internal data check)– Use „remark“ field to explain cause of missing data– In case of re-coding of agglomerations, plants, maintain a change list– QA issues identified in voluntarily reported data should be reviewed and amended

(as they are used in the products derived from the UWWTD Waterbase,– If reporting „changes hands“ make sure that the knowledge/experience is passed

on– The dataset quality should not deterioriate (significantly) since previous reporting

(i.e.start 9th dataset compilation by looking at teh 8th data submission)

• On the use of CDR – Use the CDR as the final point of data submission– Any further update must be uploaded in the CDR– The QAQC proces in the CDR should be completed– Data envelope should be finalized– Confirmation letter to be saved by the reporter


9

UWWTD data products

• UWWTD Waterbase-reported data (art.15 data)

• UWWTD Waterbase– derived data

• (compliance assessment results, URL links to individual web sites, links to the UWWT fiche in data viewer) assessment

– UWWTD Map viewer

– UWWTD Data viewer

– Indicators

• Reference layer of the catchments of sensitive areas


10

UWWTD Waterbase• UWWTD Waterbase is an extract

from the UWWTD Production DB , the selection of parameters includes those relevant for the assessment and visualisation of article 15 data


11

UWWTD map viewer

• What´s new:– New layer on UWWT plants performace complaince (based on

MS self-assessment)– New layer on additional polishing treatment (e.g. Disinfection,

filtration, etc.– Links to the National websites on UWWTD implementation– Pop up windows more user friendly– Link to detailed data sheets (UWWT fiche-report- in data viewer)

derived from the Waterbase

– URL to the map viewer


12

NEW: UWWT plants performace complaince (based on MS self-assessment)


13

NEW: additional polishing treatment

14

UWWTD map viewer- agglomerations-overal compliance (NEW: user frindly pop-up

windows)


15

New: UWWTD treatment plants –by treatment type (example of the link to the UWWT fiche)


16

Reference layer• Update of the reference layer based

on 2013 data

• The following MS submitted updated spatial data:

• BG, CY, ES, FR, HR, IE, IT, SI, UK

• ETC ICM carried out the quality assurance of the shape files and attributes and checked the consistency with the tabular data on receiving areas.

• After the topology check ETC ICM performed a cleaning of the compiled layer of the catchments. The final (cleaned) version was sent to the reporters and approved.


17

Reference layer of the UWWTD sensitive areas


18

UWWTD data viewer


19

Emission intensity of domestic sector in Europe (WREI 002)

• Specific policy question: Is nutrient emission intensity of domestic sector decreasing?

Event/ date: UWWTD Committee Meeting, 10.10.13, BrusselsAuthor: Petra Ronen, Anita Künitzer

20

Lessons learned (1)

• Discrepancy between datasets in the web tool and in the CDR– Proposed way forward: CDR is the only entry point for data submission

(e.g.data sent by e-mail will not be considered as delivered).

– UWWTD web tool will not be used in the 9th data request, QAQC rules will be implemented in the CDR instead (and used mandatory by reporters)

• QAQC proces in the CDR was not (always) utilized and completed– Proposed way forward : Extended QAQC rules will be implemented in

the CDR (and used mandatory by reporters)

• Lengthy data amendment resulting in numerous re-submissions of (still erroneous) dataset– Proposed way forward : (more complex) data amendment will be

described in detail (by the Reporter) and description provided to the helpdesk

21

Lessons learned (2)

• Some information/data retrieved from the UWWTD DB for the purposes of compliance check was ambiguous (e.g.reported monitoring data for N and P pass, while N and P treatment not installed)− Proposed way forward : relevant additional QA rules will be developer

and applied to avoid ambiguity

• Harmonization of spatial data (receiving areas) for the reference layer was resource demanding, due to high level of diversity of reported data− Proposed way forward : revision of the QAQC guidance on reporting

spatial data under UWWTD with an ephasis on incorporating INSPIRE data provision requirements

22

Lessons learned (3)

• Some MS modified their data (e.g.changes in agglomeration size, types of treatment, etc.) after the complaince assessment, which required extra resources on the helpdesk activites.– Proposed way forward : more attention should be given to internal data

check (to be done by the MS) prior the data submission.

23

Tentative roadmap for the 9th reporting exercise

• Data request preparation (April-October 2015)– Modification of data model

– Review of the QAQC proces, additional scripts

– CDR QA process review and improvement

– CDR testing (MS involvement welcome)

– CDR QA process finalization

– Update of UWWTD reporting documents, update of ROD

• Data request launch (December 2015)• Data submission (December 2015-June 2016)• Provision of helpdesk support (December 2015-June 2016)


24

ETC ICM /Cenia team thanks to the UWWTD reporters for a

good cooperation .


Summary on the Reporting for the 8 th UWWTD Implementation Report Prepared by ETC/ICM Event/ date:...

Documents

Transcript of Summary on the Reporting for the 8 th UWWTD Implementation Report Prepared by ETC/ICM Event/ date:...